Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
This appendix discusses the design of block foundations and pile-supported foundations for vibrating machinery. Two attachments will guide the engineer in collecting
needed data for use in the design: Machinery Unbalances lists data needed from
vendors of the reciprocating or rotating machinery to be mounted on the foundation; and Soil Data lists data needed in order to calculate the dynamic properties
of the soil on site.
Contents
Chevron Corporation
Page
A1.0
Introduction
A-2
A2.0
Block Foundations
A-2
A2.1
A2.2
Modes of Vibration
A2.3
Dynamic Parameters
A2.4
Response Parameters
A2.5
A2.6
A3.0
Pile-Supported Foundations
A3.1
Introduction
A3.2
A3.3
Coordinate System
A3.4
Spring Constants
A3.5
A4.0
Attachments
A4.1
Machinery Unbalances
A4.2
Soil Data
A4.3
Design Aids
A5.0
References
A-11
A-17
A-21
A-1
December 1993
Appendix A
A1.0
Introduction
This appendix has been formulated as a guide to the design of foundations for
vibrating machinery. Specifically, this method of analysis should be used as an aid
to the designer in determining the maximum amplitudes of vibration and comparing
them with acceptable values. This is accomplished by first obtaining the dynamic
parameters of the foundation-soil system. These parameters are then used to determine the natural frequencies of the system from which the amplitudes of vibration
are then calculated. This appendix assumes that the designer has some knowledge
of vibration theory, as well as a thorough description of the static and dynamic characteristics of the machinery, and data describing the dynamic properties of the soil
at the installation site. Section A4.0, Attachments, should be consulted as needed
during the analysis procedure.
Methods of analysis are developed herein for block foundations on grade and block
foundations on piles. The analysis for block foundations on grade is based on
Richart and Whitman [14], [21] and assumes only one engine is in operation on the
mat. This analysis is theoretically rigorous and produces accurate results. The analysis of pile-supported foundations is based on a procedure developed by N. C.
Donovan, et al, of Dames and Moore [23] and its accuracy has been confirmed by
field test data.
A2.0
Block Foundations
A2.1
December 1993
1.
2.
Locate the centroid of the foundation-soil contact area on a vertical line with
the foundation plus machine center of mass; the eccentricity of these points
should not exceed .05B.
3.
Distribute the foundation mass for the smallest possible moment of inertia with
respect to the principal axis through the centroid of the foundation-soil contact
area (e.g., use minimum pedestal height H).
4.
5.
For natural soil bases, the foundation embedment depth should exceed the
depth of frost penetration.
A-2
Chevron Corporation
Appendix A
Fig. A-1
6.
A2.2
b.
c.
Compute the dynamic parameters for each pedestal as if they were not
connected by a common mat.
Modes of Vibration
During the operation of moving machinery, the foundation-soil system may experience one of four possible modes of vibration depending on the direction of the
unbalanced forces:
Chevron Corporation
1.
2.
3.
Rocking () about either the X-X or Y-Y axis. These axes lie in the plane of
the mat-soil contact area and intersect at the centroid of this area.
4.
Twisting () about the vertical Z-Z axis. This axis passes through the center of
gravity of the combined foundation-machine mass.
A-3
December 1993
Appendix A
A2.3
Dynamic Parameters
The design of a foundation for reciprocating or rotating machinery requires an estimation of the dynamic parameters of the foundation-soil system. The inertia,
elastic, and damping parameters can be calculated from the following formulae:
1.
Inertia Parameters
a.
Mass, m
1
m = --- ( W M + W F + W A )
g
(Eq. A-1)
where:
m = Mass of the foundation-machine system, lb-sec2-in-1
g = Acceleration of gravity, in-sec-2
wM = Dead weight of machinery, lb
wF = Dead weight of foundation block, lb
wA = Dead weight of any appurtenances on foundation, lb
b.
where:
Io = Mass moment of inertia of component about its own axis, lb-sec2in
mc = Mass of component, lb-sec2-in-1
l = Distance between axis of component and rotation axis, in
Ij = Mass moment of inertia of component about axis of rotation
( = ,), lb-sec2-in
The moment of inertia of the entire foundation/machine system about a
given rotation axis (I, I) is then the sum of the moments of inertia for
each component about that axis. Section A4.3 contains useful information
for determining Io.
December 1993
A-4
Chevron Corporation
2.
Appendix A
Elastic Parameters
The spring constant for the six different modes of vibration (see Figure A-1)
can be found directly from the following formulae and the soil data of
Section A4.2.
Vertical, lb-in.-1
G
K z = ------------ z BL
1
(Eq. A-3)
Horizontal, lb-in-1
K x or y = 2 ( 1 + )G x BL
(Eq. A-4)
Rocking, lb-in
G
K = ------------ BL 2
1
(Eq. A-5)
Twisting, lb-in
3
16 BL ( B 2 + L 2 ) --4K = ------ G -------------------------------3
6
(Eq. A-6)
where:
x, z, and are coefficients from Figure A-2 and
B = Width of foundation measured along axis of rotation for rocking
or normal to direction of horizontal force for translation, in
L = Length of foundation measured in the plane of rotation for
rocking or in the direction of horizontal force for translation, in.
See example in Figure A-3
= Poissons Ratio of soil, dimensionless
3.
Damping Parameters
The equivalent damping of the foundation-soil system can be completed from:
= i + r
(Eq. A-7)
Chevron Corporation
A-5
December 1993
Appendix A
Fig. A-2
Fig. A-3
i, the internal soil damping, is given in Figure A-13, Section A4.2 for the
appropriate soil conditions; r, the radiation damping, can be found from
Figure A-4, where:
For Translation:
3
m BL --2b = ---- -------
(Eq. A-8)
For Rocking:
5
I BL 3 --4b = ---- --------- 3
(Eq. A-9)
For Twisting:
5
I BL ( B 2 + L 2 ) --4b = ---- -------------------------------
6
(Eq. A-10)
December 1993
A-6
Chevron Corporation
Appendix A
Fig. A-4
A2.4
Radiation Damping r
Response Parameters
The response parameters, which characterize the motion of the foundation, can be
calculated from the dynamic parameters and the machinery data. The crucial parameters are:
1.
where:
j =. . . . . . . . . x, y For Horizontal Translation
=. . . . . . . . . z For Vertical Translation
=. . . . . . . . . For Rocking
=. . . . . . . . . For Twisting
(Note: For rocking and twisting, replace m with I and I, respectively.)
2.
Frequency Ratios, j
= -----j
fj
(Eq. A-12)
where:
j = Actual frequency of machinery unbalance during j mode of vibration, cycles per second
Chevron Corporation
A-7
December 1993
Appendix A
3.
M = [(1
j2 ) 2
1
--2
2
4 j ] 2
(Eq. A-13)
b.
Calculate the static deflection (j) or rotation (, ) caused by the unbalanced forces (Fj) or unbalanced couples (Mo).
F
j = ----j
kj
Units: in . . for translation (j = x, y, z)
(Eq. A-14)
Fj d + Mo
= --------------------K
Units: radians . . for rocking
(Eq. A-15)
Fj d + Mo
= --------------------K
Units: radians . . for twisting
(Eq. A-16)
where:
Fj = The unbalanced forces, lb
Mo = The unbalanced couples, in-lb
d = The perpendicular distance from Fj to the axis of rotation, in
K = Spring constants defined in section A2.3, lb/in
c.
December 1993
A-8
Chevron Corporation
Appendix A
A = Md
Units: in . . for rocking
(Eq. A-18)
A = Md
Units: in . . for twisting
(Eq. A-19)
A2.5
where:
A = Amplitude in inches, and
f = Machine frequency in cpm
Chevron Corporation
A-9
December 1993
Appendix A
Fig. A-5
A2.6
December 1993
The perpendicular distance from an axis of rotation to any point where the
deflection is desired, in.
Fj
fj
Io
The mass moment of inertia of a body about its own axis, lbs-sec2-in
A-10
Chevron Corporation
A3.0
Appendix A
Ij
Kj
In computing Ij; the distance between the axis of a component mass and a
rotation axis of the foundation, in.
Mo
mc
WA
WF
WM
Rotation of the foundation about the vertical Z axis during twisting mode of
vibration, radians
Pile-Supported Foundations
A3.1
Introduction
There are many methods by which dynamically loaded pile-supported foundations
may be analyzed. Nearly all methods prove to be quite tedious and laborious and
address the central problem of modeling the interaction between the soil and the
piles. This interaction is dependent on the behavior of the soil under a loaded condi-
Chevron Corporation
A-11
December 1993
Appendix A
tion. Therefore, no method of analysis is exact due to the high redundant condition
existing and only a close approximation can be achieved.
The method used herein was developed by N. C. Donovan, et al, of Dames and
Moore [23]. It is a straightforward method by which the spring constants for a pilesupported foundation may be computed. This approach attempts to simplify the soilpile interaction by modeling the piled foundation as an equivalent cantilever
system. The equivalent cantilever lengths in the model are calculated such that their
behavior is equal to the actual pile under the same external loads. Figure A-6 shows
a schematic model of a piled foundation.
Fig. A-6
A3.2
December 1993
A-12
Chevron Corporation
Appendix A
1
EI --5L b = 1.86 ------ , in
N
(Eq. A-21)
where:
E = Modulus of elasticity of the pile, lb-in-2
I = Moment of inertia of the pile in the direction of bending, in4
N = The constant of horizontal subgrade reaction, lb-in-3
(Note: For tapered piles, an average value of I should be used.)
For a clayey soil, Lb can be computed from the following equation:
1
EI --4L b = 1.73 -----k
(Eq. A-22)
where:
k = the coefficient of vertical subgrade reaction, lb-in-3
In the absence of a reliable soils report of the surrounding soil, values for N
and k may be taken from Figures A-7 and A-8, respectively.
Fig. A-7
Values of N [20]
N for Dry or Moist Sand,
lb/in3
Loose
Medium
25
16
Dense
65
40
Consistency of Clay
qu
Unconfined Compressive
Strength, lb/in2
k, lb/in3
Stiff
13-28
90
Very Stiff
28-56
175
Fig. A-8
A3.3
Values of k [20]
Coordinate System
As indicated in Figure A-9, the origin for the rectangular coordinate system is
located at the center of gravity of the pile group and each pile is located by the X
and Y coordinates. The pile is further defined by the horizontal angle, , to the
direction of batter and by the angle of batter, , measured in a vertical plane. The
ranges for and are:
Chevron Corporation
A-13
December 1993
Appendix A
0 360
0 90
However, the practical upper limitation on is much lower than 90 degrees since 90
degrees represents a horizontal pile. Also, note that is always measured in a
clockwise direction from the positive X axis.
Fig. A-9
A3.4
Spring Constants
The equations used in calculating the spring constants for all six modes of vibration
are given in Figures A-10 and A-11 depending on whether the pileheads are considered fixed or pinned at the pile cap. These spring constants are used in the equa-
December 1993
A-14
Chevron Corporation
Appendix A
tions given in Section A2.4 to determine the natural frequencies of vibration for the
pile-supported foundation.
Fig. A-10 Equivalent Spring Constants, Fixed Head Condition
Vertical
i=n
KZ =
i=1
Ei li
E i Ai 3
sin2 i cos3 i
----------- cos i + 12 -------3
L
L ci
bi
(Eq. A-23)
Horizontal
i=n
Ei Ai
Ei li
KX =
bi
i=1
(Eq. A-24)
For horizontal spring constant (Ky) in y direction, values for i should be changed to
( i 90)
Rocking about y-axis
i=n
K =
Ei Ai
Ei li
Ei li
Ei li
bi
i=1
bi
(Eq. A-25)
Rocking about x-axis
K = Replace xi with yi in the above expression and replace i with ( i 90)
Torsion about z-axis
i=n
K =
Ei Ai
Ei li
i=1
(Eq. A-26)
where:
n = the total number of piles supporting the foundation
A = the cross-sectional area of the pile, in2
The equivalent mass and mass moment of inertia used in the equations for both
fixed and free head conditions are calculated for the foundation block, machinery,
and significant appurtenances. Furthermore, the equivalent damping, , of the foundation-soil system can conservatively be assumed to be 0.10.
Chevron Corporation
A-15
December 1993
Appendix A
KZ =
Ei Ai
Ei li
bi
i=1
(Eq. A-27)
Horizontal
i=n
KX =
i=1
Ei Ai
Ei li
cos i ----------- sin2 i cos2 i + 3 -------- ( cos4 i cos2 i + cos2 i sin2 i )
L ci
L3
bi
(Eq. A-28)
For horizontal spring constant (Ky) in y direction, values for i should be changed to
( i 90)
Rocking about y-axis
i=n
K =
Ei Ai
Ei li
Ei li
Ei li
- x 2 cos3 i + 3 --------x i2 sin2 i + -------- cos i + 1.5 -------- sin i cos2 i cos i
---------L ci i
L bi
L3
L2
bi
i=1
bi
(Eq. A-29)
Rocking about x-axis
K = Replace xi with yi in the above expression and replace i with ( i 90)
Torsion about z-axis
i=n
K =
i=1
Ei Ai
Ei li
ri2 cos i ----------- sin2 i cos2 i + 3 -------- ( cos4 i cos2 i + cos2 i sin2 i )
L ci
L3
bi
(Eq. A-30)
where:
n = the total number of piles supporting the foundation
A = the cross-sectional area of the pile, in2
A3.5
December 1993
A-16
Chevron Corporation
A4.0
Appendix A
KX
KY
KZ
Spring constant for the foundation undergoing vertical mode of vibration, lbin-1
Lb
Lc
The radial distance from the center of gravity of the pile group to a pile, in
xi
yi
The angle between the pile batter projection on the horizontal plane and the
normal to ri
The horizontal clockwise angle from the positive X-axis to the direction of
pile batter
Attachments
A4.1
Machinery Unbalances
The design of foundations for vibrating machinery requires certain information
which describes the dynamic characteristics of the machinery and the dynamic properties of the soil. This data, together with the normal static design data, is essential
in the design of an economical foundation which will not experience excessive
vibrations. The characteristics of the unbalanced machinery forces and the dynamic
properties of the soil define the design case; the objective of the designer is to
couple these systems through a foundation in such a manner that excessive vibrations will not occur.
Reciprocating and rotating machinery develop inertial forces or moments during
normal operation from the motion of unbalanced rods, cranks, blades, etc. The characteristics of these forces are different for these two basic types of machinery, and
the foundation design will reflect this difference. Reciprocating machines can
develop forces at frequencies corresponding to integer multiples of the operating
Chevron Corporation
A-17
December 1993
Appendix A
speed (e.g., secondary moments), but rotating machines can only develop primary
forces or moments [3]. Rotating machines produce forces whose magnitude
depends on the speed of the machine; these forces are specified by a mass mo, at an
eccentricity e from the shaft centerline, and the speed at which the mass rotates
[14], [21]. The manufacturer or vendor of the machinery should supply the designer
with the data contained in Figure A-12.
Fig. A-12 Vendor-supplied Data, Reciprocating and Rotating Machinery
Reciprocating Machinery
Range of Operating Speed =
Maximum horizontal primary forces
to
RPM
Fx1
lbs
Fy1
lbs
Fx2
lbs
Fy2
lbs
Fz1
lbs
Fz2
lbs
F1
in-lbs
F2
in-lbs
F1
in-lbs
F2
in-lbs
Rotating Machinery
Range of Operating Speed =
to
RPM
Eccentric Mass
mo
lbs-sec2-in-1
Eccentricity
in
A4.2
Soil Data
The foundation designer should have sufficient soil data such that the dynamic properties of the soil on site can be calculated. Soil data is in general difficult to obtain,
and its validity is often questionable. However, the designer must produce several
soil parameters, if the methods of this appendix are to be employed. Data from on-
December 1993
A-18
Chevron Corporation
Appendix A
site borings and tests should be used, when it is available; general summaries of soil
properties are of limited value and should be used only where on-site data is
unavailable.
It is essential that the designer have a thorough qualitative description of the soil
and subgrade structure. With this information, the designer can at least approximate
the soil properties of the installation site with the information listed below, when
quantitative test data is unavailable.
The quantitative soil properties required in this appendix are:
Saturated
G kip/in2
Dense w/Gravel
116-135
135-145
15-30
.25-.35
.02-.04
Dense
116-130
135-145
10-20
.25-.35
.02-.00
Med. Dense
109-116
130-135
6-10
90-99
113-124
3-6
.35-.5
.02-0.04
Sand
Loose
Clay
Note
Chevron Corporation
Hard
110
15-30
Stiff
~ 100
6-15
Soft
~ 90
3-6
The classification for clays should be based on shear strength approximately as follows:
soft < 3 psi
stiff 10 psi
hard > 20 psi
A-19
December 1993
Appendix A
A4.3
Design Aids
Figure A-14 shows mass moment of inertia for various bodies. The mass of the
body is indicated by m.
Axis
Moment of Inertia
a2
m -----12
(Eq. A-32)
a2 + b2
m ----------------12
(Eq. A-33)
a2 + b2
m ----------------12
(Eq. A-34)
Sphere, radius r
Any diameter
2
m --- r 2
5
(Eq. A-35)
Any diameter
5
5
2 ( r1 r2 )
m --- -------------------5 (r 3 r3)
1
2
(Eq. A-36)
Right circular cylinder of radius r,
length l
r2
m ---2
(Eq. A-37)
Transverse diameter
r2 l2
m ---- + ------
4 12
(Eq. A-38)
( r 12 + r 22 )
m --------------------2
(Eq. A-39)
Transverse diameter
( r 12 + r 22 ) l 2
m -------------------- + ------
4
12
(Eq. A-40)
3
m ------ r 2
10
(Eq. A-41)
December 1993
A-20
Chevron Corporation
A5.0
Appendix A
References
1.
2.
ASCHENBRENNER, Rudolf, Three-Dimensional Analysis of Pile Foundations, Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, Vol. 93, No. ST1, February
1967, pp. 201-219.
3.
4.
5.
6.
GRAY, H., Discussion to Francis, (1964) Analysis of Pile Groups with Flexural Resistance, Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division, ASCE,
November 1964.
7.
8.
9.
10. POULOS, Harry G., Behavior of Laterally Loaded Piles: I - Single Piles,
Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division, ASCE, Vol. 97, No. SM5,
May 1971, pp. 711-731.
11. POULOS, Harry G., Behavior of Laterally Loaded Piles: II - Pile Groups,
Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division, ASCE, Vol. 97, No. SM5,
May 1971, pp. 733-751.
12. REESE, Lymon C. and Hudson MATLOCK, Non-dimensional Solutions for
Laterally Loaded Piles with Soil Modulus Assumed Proportional to Depth,
Proceedings Eighth Texas Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Special Publication No. 29, Bureau of Engineering Research, University of Texas, 1956.
13. RICHART, F. E., Jr., J. R. HALL, Jr. and R. D. WOODS, Vibration of Soils
and Foundations, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1970.
14. RICHART, F. E., Jr. and R. V. WHITMAN, Comparison of Footing Vibration
Tests with Theory, Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division,
ASCE, Vol. 93, No. SM6, 1967, pp. 143-193.
Chevron Corporation
A-21
December 1993
Appendix A
15. RODGERS, Grover L., Dynamics of Framed Structures, John Wiley and Sons,
Inc., New York, 1959.
16. SAUL, William E., Static and Dynamic Analysis of Pile Foundations,
Journal of Structural Division, ASCE, Vol. 94, No. ST5, Proceedings paper
5936, May 1968, pp. 1077-1100.
17. Shock and Vibration Handbook, Vol. I, II, III, ed. by Cyril M. Harris and
Charles E. Crede, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1961.
18. SINGHAL, A. C., J. C. WACHEL and F. R. SZENASI, Computation of
Natural Frequencies of Compressor Foundations Supported on Different
Soils, Pipeline Compressor and Research Council, Southern Gas Association,
Report No. 132, Southwest Research Institute, July 15, 1969.
19. TERZAGHI, Karl and Ralph E. PECK, Soil Mechanics in Engineering Practice, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 1964.
20. TERZAGHI, K., Evaluation of Coefficients of Subgrade Reaction, Geotechnique, Vol. 5, No. 4.
21. WHITMAN, R. V. and F. E. RICHART, Jr., Design Procedures for Dynamically Loaded Foundations, Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division, Proceedings ASCE, Vol. 93, No. SM6, November 1967, pp. 169-193.
22. Design Manual, Soil Mechanics, Foundations, and Earth Structures,
NAVFAC DM-7, Department of the Navy, March 1971.
23. SINGH, J. P., N. C. DONOVAN, and A. C. JOBSIS, Design Procedures for
Dynamically Loaded Pile-supported Foundations, Journal of Geotechnical
Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 103, No. GT8, August 1977, pp. 863-877.
24. Final Report on Machinery Foundation Design Standards, Report No. AER
1800 EPI 71-51, prepared by ARAMCO Services Company.
December 1993
A-22
Chevron Corporation