Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Wear
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/wear
High temperature sliding wear behaviour of Inconel 617 and Stellite 6 alloys
Yucel Birol
Materials Institute, Marmara Research Center, 41470 TUBITAK, Kocaeli, Turkey
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 11 March 2010
Received in revised form 7 July 2010
Accepted 7 July 2010
Available online 15 July 2010
Keywords:
Sliding wear
Steel
High temperature
Wear testing
a b s t r a c t
The high temperature wear performance of Inconel 617 and Stellite 6 alloys was investigated and compared with that of the X32CrMoV33 hot work tool steel. The wear performance of the latter at 750 C is
judged to be very poor due basically to its inferior oxidation resistance. Extensive oxidation co-occurring
with wear at 750 C leads to substantial material loss basically due to the lack of an adhesive oxide scale,
sufciently ductile to sustain the wear action without extensive spalling. The wear resistance of the
Inconel 617 and Stellite 6 alloys at 750 C is relatively superior. The adhesive oxides growing slowly on
Inconel 617 and Stellite 6 alloys sustain the wear action without spalling and are claimed to be responsible
for the superior wear resistance of these alloys at 750 C.
2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
High temperature wear is one of the life-limiting factors when
metallic surfaces are in repeated contact [13]. High forming
temperatures impact the wear behaviour of tools through loss
of mechanical strength and enhanced oxidation [4]. The significant role of the latter in high temperature sliding wear was
rst identied by Fink [5]. It is well known that oxidation leads
to material degradation and consequently, reduces the material
resistance to wear. However, a surface oxide may reduce the
oxidation rate and help to decrease the wear loss if it is dense
and strong [6,7]. The role of oxide scale in the wear of metals
was discussed extensively both for ambient and high temperature wear [816] while the mechanisms of oxidation wear were
reviewed by Quinn [17,18]. Some new approaches on the interpretation of oxidation wear mechanisms have also been proposed
[19].
High temperature wear is identied to be a potential failure
mechanism for thixoforging tools [20,21]. While thixoforging is a
very attractive processing route for the manufacture of steel parts
for drive units and chassis components, it is very demanding on
tool materials with high process temperatures involved (>1300 C)
[22]. The conventional hot work tool steels were shown to rapidly
deteriorate under such severe conditions [2327]. With a dispersion of hard carbide particles in a cobalt-rich solid solution matrix,
cobalt-base alloys are exceptionally good for applications requiring resistance to oxidation and wear [2831]. Ni-base alloys are
665
Table 1
Chemical composition of the X32CrMoV33 hot work tool steel and Ni- and Co-based high temperature alloys used in the present work.
Alloy
Si
Mn
Cr
X32CrMoV33
Inconel 617
Stellite 6
0.281
0.080
1.089
0.190
0.945
1.099
0.200
0.513
1.154
3.005
21.88
28.272
Mo
2.788
8.177
0.004
Ni
Al
Co
Cu
Nb
Ti
Fe
0.221
53.861
2.802
0.025
0.167
0.094
<0.010
10.872
58.241
0.1651
0.304
0.0015
0.010
0.033
<0.001
0.211
0.413
0.009
0.020
4.512
92.63
2.850
2.660
Fig. 1. Experimental set-up for high temperature ball-on-disc sliding wear test.
Fig. 3. Wear volume loss of the X32CrMoV33, Inconel 617 and Stellite 6 disc samples
submitted to high temperature ball-on-disc sliding wear test.
Cu K radiation and step size of 0.02 was also used to identify the
oxides formed on the worn surfaces. The hardness of the samples
were measured in Vickers units with a load of 1 kg (HV1) before
and after the wear test.
Fig. 2. Two- and three-dimensional prolometer images and two-dimensional surface proles of the X32CrMoV33, Inconel 617 and Stellite 6 disc samples submitted to high
temperature ball-on-disc sliding wear test.
666
Fig. 4. Friction coefcient curves of the X32CrMoV33, Inconel 617 and Stellite 6 disc samples submitted to ball-on-disc sliding wear test at 750 C.
Fig. 5. Optical micrographs of (a) X32CrMoV33, (b) Inconel 617 and (c) Stellite 6
disc samples submitted to ball-on-disc sliding wear test at 750 C.
est volume loss occurred in the hot work tool steel. It is clear from
Fig. 2 that the surface of the hot work tool steel disc sample has
deteriorated not only inside but also outside the wear track, due to
the extensive oxidation suffered by this material at the test temperature. The width and the depth of the wear tracks are relatively
smaller in the Inconel 617 alloy and the smallest in the Stellite 6
alloy. These are consistent with the wear volume loss measurements which clearly identify the hot work tool steel to be the least
and the Stellite 6 alloy the most resistant to sliding wear at 750 C
(Fig. 3).
The friction coefcients measured during the sliding wear tests
are shown in Fig. 4. The friction coefcient of the X32CrMoV33 hot
Fig. 6. Optical micrographs showing transverse section of the wear track of (a)
X32CrMoV33, (b) Inconel 617 and (c) Stellite 6 disc samples.
667
work tool steel is as low as 0.2 at the start of the test and increases
with time to approximately 0.4. The thick oxide layer formed on
the surface of the tool steel at 750 C is believed to have served as
a lubricant leading to a low friction coefcient initially. Low friction coefcients are linked with poor adherence and thick oxide
layers [38,39] which help to enlarge the contact surface thereby
decreasing the strain and thus the friction coefcient [40]. Small
initial friction coefcient values may also be accounted for by the
sudden loss of strength upon thermal exposure. The decohesion of
Fig. 7. Scanning electron micrographs of (a) X32CrMoV33, (b) Inconel 617 and (c)
Stellite 6 disc samples submitted to ball-on-disc sliding wear test at 750 C.
Fig. 8. Scanning electron micrographs of (a) X32CrMoV33, (b) Inconel 617 and (c)
Stellite 6 disc samples submitted to ball-on-disc sliding wear test at 750 C.
668
Fig. 9. Scanning electron micrograph of the glazed layer in Inconel 617 disc sample
submitted to ball-on-disc sliding wear test at 750 C.
Fig. 10. Element distribution proles (a, b, c) and oxygen distribution proles (d, e, f) across the wear tracks of (a, d) X32CrMoV33, (b, e) Inconel 617 and (c, f) Stellite 6 disc
samples submitted to ball-on-disc sliding wear test at 750 C.
669
ture and removal of the surface oxides inside the wear track and
reoxidation of the fresh surface are claimed to be responsible for
the substantial wear loss suffered by the hot work tool steel. The
removed oxide itself might have acted as an abrasive agent whilst
still within the wear interface producing an abrasive element in the
wear of X32CrMoV33. Fig. 7a suggests that this is a likely mechanism when the oxide debris does not readily sinter to form a glaze
and act as a third body abrasive [11].
The features of the worn surfaces of the Inconel 617 and Stellite
6 alloys are markedly different (Figs. 7 and 8). The oxides on the
Inconel 617 and Stellite 6 samples are very thin. The oxide debris,
although much less in quantity, was somehow retained inside the
Fig. 11. XRD spectra obtained from the tested surfaces of (a) X32CrMoV33 and (b) Stellite 6 disc samples submitted to ball-on-disc sliding wear test at 750 C.
670
wear track and was compacted into a glazed surface [2,42,43]. The
high hardness of the alumina ball and its capacity to form large
groves so as to retain the oxide debris inside the wear track might
have been critical in glazed layer formation. While the glazed layer
is continuous in the Inconel 617 alloy and marks the boundary of
the wear track all around the disc sample, it is revealed as discontinuous patches inside the wear track in the Stellite 6 alloy.
The glazed surfaces in the contact zone have been reported to be
responsible for the relatively lower friction coefcients at high temperatures as they increase the carrying surface [44]. This could be
a plausible account of the low friction coefcient in the Inconel
617 alloy where the glazed layer in the wear track is uninterrupted
(Fig. 9).
It is inferred from the increased signal intensities across the
wear tracks of the Inconel 617 and Stellite 6 disc samples that the
oxygen concentration is greater inside the wear tracks than it is
outside where oxidation has occurred statically (Fig. 10). Generation of fresh surface and defects due to abrasion via sliding wear
and subsequent reoxidation may be responsible for the relatively
higher oxygen levels inside the wear tracks. Oxygen signals become
even stronger when crossing the glazed layers. Such a signal prole
is not evident in the case of the hot work tool steel which is believed
to be heavily oxidised both inside and outside the wear track.
It is fair to conclude from the foregoing that the hightemperature wear performance of the three alloys tested in the
present work is closely linked with their oxidation behaviour at
750 C. The tribological behaviour is strongly affected by the nature,
the thickness, the adherence, and the morphology of the oxide
scales [45,46]. The thick surface oxide layer on the tool steel sample
is shown by XRD analysis to consist of Fe3 O4 and Fe2 O3 (Fig. 11a).
The poor adherence and limited ductility of these oxides promote
the failure of the oxide scale impairing the resistance to wear at elevated temperatures [47]. Lack of oxide debris sinterability, which
appears to be adequate in the case of Inconel 617 and Stellite 6
alloys, as inferred from Fig. 8c, might have also contributed to the
poor wear resistance of the tool steel sample [11]. The adhesive and
highly plastic Cr2 O3 lm, identied to be the predominant oxide
on the surface of both Inconel 617 and Stellite 6 samples (Fig. 11b),
on the other hand, has sustained the abrasion and is claimed to
be responsible for the improved wear resistance of these alloys at
750 C as suggested in [47,48]. The reduced oxidation rate in these
two alloys suppresses the synergy between oxidation and wear,
thus improving the resistance to wear at 750 C. High-temperature
alloys rely on Cr to form protective scales and require a minimum
of 20 wt% Cr to develop a continuous Cr2 O3 lm to enjoy protection
[49]. With a Cr content only as much as 3 wt% and with hardly any
Si and Al, the present hot work tool steel evidently lacks a continuous protective oxide and cannot take advantage of such protection.
The strain-induced phase transformation from face-centred-cubic
to hexagonal-close-packed structure and alignment of the basal
plane to the direction of sliding, could also be responsible for the
reduced wear of the Stellite 6 alloy [50,51].
Wear resistance of the X32CrMoV33 tool steel is impaired
at high temperatures also via loss of mechanical strength.
X32CrMoV33 tool steel responded to thermal exposure at 750 C
with a sharp hardness drop (Fig. 12). This is not surprising since
most hot work tool steels are known to soften starting around
600 C [52]. The substantial softening in the X32CrMoV33 hot
work tool steel is believed to have been critical in the wear volume loss it has suffered. Inconel 617 and Stellite 6 alloys, on the
other hand, retain their hardness at 750 C and are thus much
more wear resistant owing to a higher resistance to abrasion. The
wear volume loss and hot hardness are inversely proportional suggesting that the wear resistance of the three alloys tested in the
present work is closely linked with their hardness at this temperature.
Fig. 12. Hardness measurements of X32CrMoV33, Inconel 617 and Stellite 6 disc
samples before and after ball-on-disc sliding wear test at 750 C.
4. Conclusions
The sliding wear performance of the X32CrMoV33 hot work
tool steel is degraded at 750 C due basically to its inferior oxidation resistance. Extensive oxidation co-occurring with abrasion at
750 C leads to substantial material loss basically due to the lack
of an adhesive oxide scale, sufciently ductile to sustain the abrasive action without extensive cracking or spalling. Fe3 O4 fails to
survive the abrasion conditions and is readily detached from the
surface. The wear resistance of the Inconel 617 and Stellite 6 alloys,
on the other hand, is much better at 750 C. The adhesive and the
relatively more plastic Cr2 O3 on Inconel 617 and Stellite 6 alloys
sustains the sliding wear action without spalling and is claimed to
be responsible for the improved wear resistance of these alloys at
750 C.
Acknowledgements
D. I sler performed the ball-on-disc wear tests. Prof. M. Urgen is
thanked for the provision of the wear test facilities. F. Alageyik and
O. Cakr are thanked for their help in the experiments and C. Berk
for his help in SEM-EDS investigations. This work was funded by
TUBITAK.
References
[1] I.A. Inman, S. Datta, H.L. Du, J.S. Burnell-Gray, Q. Luo, Microscopy of glazed
layers formed during high temperature sliding wear at 750 C, Wear 254 (2003)
461467.
[2] A. Pauschitz, M. Roy, F. Franek, Mechanisms of sliding wear of metals and alloys
at elevated temperatures, Tribol. Int. 41 (2008) 584602.
[3] X. Jiang, W. Liu, S.Y. Dong, B.S. Xu, Surf. Coat. Technol. 194 (2005) 10.
[4] Y. Birol, D. I sler, Response to thermal cycling of CAPVD (Al,Cr)N-coated hot
work tool steel, Surf. Coat. Technol. doi:10.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.06.038.
[5] M. Fink, Wear oxidationa new component of wear, Trans. Am. Soc. Steel 18
(1930) 10261034.
[6] J.-N. Aoh, J.-C. Chen, On the wear characteristics of cobalt-based hardfacing
layer after thermal fatigue and oxidation, Wear 250 (2001) 611620.
[7] F.H. Stott, The role of oxidation in the wear of metals, Tribol. Int. 31 (1998)
6171.
[8] T.F.J. Quinn, J.L. Sullivan, D.M. Rowson, Origins and development of oxidational
wear at low ambient temperatures, Wear 94 (1984) 175191.
[9] J.P. Tu, X.H. Jie, Z.Y. Mao, M. Matsumara, The effect of temperature on the
unlubricated sliding wear of 5 CrNiMo steel against 40 MnB steel in the range
400600 C, Tribol. Int. 31 (1998) 347353.
[10] I. Radu, D.Y. Li, Investigation of the role of oxide scale on Stellite 21 modied with yttrium in resisting wear at elevated temperatures, Wear 259 (2005)
453458.
[11] I.A. Inman, S.R. Rose, P.K. Datta, Studies of high temperature sliding wear of
metallic dissimilar interfaces II: Incoloy MA956 versus Stellite 6, Tribol. Int. 39
(2006) 13611375.
[12] M. Roy, A. Pauschitz, J. Wernisch, F. Franek, Effect of mating surface on the high
temperature wear of 253 MA alloy, Mater. Corros. 55 (2004) 259273.
671
[33] Y. Birol, Thermal fatigue testing of Inconel 617 and Stellite 6 alloys as tooling
materials for thixoforming of steels, Mater. Sci. Eng. 527 (2010) 19381945.
[34] Y. Birol, Ni-based superalloy as a potential tool material for thixoforming of
steels, Ironmak. Steelmak. 36 (2009) 555560.
[35] Y. Birol, Response to thermal cycling of tool Materials under steel thixoforming
conditions (2010), Ironmak. Steelmak. 37 (2010) 4146.
[36] Y. Birol, The use of CrNiCo-based superalloy as die material in semi-solid processing of steels, Solid State Phenomena 141143 (2008) 289294.
[37] D. Schwam, J.F. Wallace, S. Bircenau, Die Materials for Critical Applications and
Increased Production Rates, DE-FC07-98ID13693, 2002.
[38] L.H.S. Lung, T. Heijkoop, The inuence of scale on friction in hot metal working,
Wear 71 (1981) 93102.
[39] P.A. Munther, J.G. Lenard, The effect of scaling on interfacial friction in hot
rolling of steels, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 88 (1999) 105113.
[40] O. Barrau, C. Boher, R. Gras, F. Rezai-Aria, Wear mechanisms and wear rate
in a high temperature dry friction of AISI H11 tool steel: inuence of debris
circulation, Wear 263 (2007) 160168.
[41] ASM Handbook, Vol. 9: Metallography and Microstructures, ISBN 0871707063.
[42] G.A. Fontalvo, C. Mitterer, The effect of oxide-forming alloying elements on the
high temperature wear of a hot work steel, Wear 258 (2005) 14911499.
[43] F.H. Stott, M.P. Jordan, The effects of load and substrate hardness on the development and maintenance of wear-protective layers during sliding at elevated
temperatures, Wear 250 (2001) 391400.
[44] F.H. Stott, High-temperature sliding wear of metals, Tribol. Int. 35 (2002)
489495.
[45] O. Joos, C. Boher, C. Vergne, C. Gaspard, T. Nylen, F. Rezai-Aria, Assessment of
oxide scales inuence on wear damage of HSM work rolls, Wear 263 (2007)
198206.
[46] A. Molinari, M. Pellizzari, A. Biggi, G. Corbo, A. Tremea, Primary carbides in spin
cast HSS for hot rolls and their effect on the oxidation behaviour, in: Proc. 6th
Int. Tooling Conference, Karlstadt University, September, 2002, pp. 365377.
[47] D.J. Stephenson, J.R. Nicholls, P. Hancock, Particle-surface interactions during
the erosion of a gas turbine material (MarM002) by pyrolytic carbon particles,
Wear 111 (1986) 1529.
[48] I.G. Wright, V. Nagarajan, J. Stringer, Observations on the role of oxide scales in
high-temperature erosioncorrosion of alloys, Oxid. Met. 25 (1986) 175199.
[49] G.Y. Lai, High-temperature Corrosion of Engineering Alloys, ASM, Materials
Park, OH, 1997.
[50] H. Kashani, M. Sadeghi Laridjani, A. Amadeh, M. Khodagholi, S. Ahmadzadeh,
The inuence of volumetric dilution on the strain induced gamma epsilon
martensitic transformation in GTAW processed CoCrMo alloy, Mater. Sci.
Eng. A478 (2008) 3842.
[51] F.H. Stott, D.S. Lin, G.C. Wood, C.W. Stevenson, The tribological behaviour of
nickel and nickel-chromium alloys at temperatures from 20 to 800 C, Wear
36 (February (2)) (1976) 147174.
[52] A. Medvedeva, J. Bergstrm, S. Gunnarsson, J. Andersson, High-temperature
properties and microstructural stability of hot-work tool steels, Mater. Sci. Eng.
A 523 (2009) 3946.