Professional Documents
Culture Documents
By
HALLAN
N.
MARSH,
LOB
* Los
ANGELES, CALIF.
COPYRIGHT,
AMEIlICAI\
J],;STIT{fTE
1930
A:\D
OF 'I1I1';I],;G A ';[1
1931,
BY THE
l\I ET 'd.TXIlGICAL
(hCOBPOHATEO)
E,(GI,(EEIlS
HALLAN N. MARSH
235
In the ultimate analysis all properties of muds are the result of, and
might be expressed in terms of, the specific gravity, fineness and concentration of the solid particles, and their degree of dispersion as determined by the presence in the water of alkali or acid, emulsifying agents
and peptizing agents, which affect the degree and form of dispersion of
the solids. However, the effects of these fundamental factors are not
well understood even by the colloidal chemist, and much less by the layman. It is therefore convenient to consider the various properties under
the following headings, which are of direct significance:
1. Specific gravity or weight per unit volume.
2. Mechanical analysis or fineness of solids.
3. Consistency (viscosity; plasticity; degree, nature and permanency
of dispersion).
Weight
It has been customary to judge the quality of a mud largely by its
" weight" or "thickness," the two terms being considered more or less
synonymous. It may be stated emphatically, however, that weight
(specific gravity) and thickness (consistency) are independent properties
and must be separately considered. A mud may be heavy enough for
all but the most extreme conditions and still be a little thicker than water.
On the contrary, a mud so thick that it will not flow in a ditch may be
as light or lighter than water, thus permitting blow-outs in territory
of moderate pressure. The specific gravity or weight per unit volume
236
Mechanical Analysis
The coarseness of the material comprising the mud is important
because it affects consistency and weight, and also because it has a
marked effect upon the life of pump parts. An approximate idea of the
percentage of coarse constituents can be obtained either by a settling
test or a centrifuge test. For the former, LyteP recommends diluting
100 C.c. of mud with 400 C.c. of water in a glass graduate. After a few
minutes of settling a majority of the coarse constituents will go to the
bottom and their volume in cubic centimeters is equal to the percentage
in the original mud. Cartwright4 recommends the centrifuge test, using
the methods and equipment used to test oil. This was previously recommended and data presented by Collom. 5 Lytel finds that in many cases
centrifuging is unsatisfactory, either because the line of demarcation
H. M. Lytel, General Petroleum Corpn. of California.
R. S. Cartwright: Rotary Drilling Problp,ms, Tm,ns. A. I. M. E., Pdrolmllll
Development amI Teclmology (1!J28-29) 12.
oJ. R. Suman: Gp. cit., 47.
3
HALLAN N. MAHSH
237
thl" line varicK wirldy wiih lengt.h of cpntrifllgillg and time of stallding
after centrifuging. In Kpite of object,ion~, however, thi~ test is good for
field use because it can be made easily with equipment available for oil
centrifuging and by methods familiar to the oil testers, and undoubtedly
gives some information.
The size of the coarser constituents can be determined by a screen
analysis. Such analyses are extremely illuminating and should be more
generally used. The finest screen ordinarily available is 325 mesh (325
wires per inch), and the material that goes through this screen mayor
may not be fine enough to remain in suspension indefinitely, as the openings in such a screen are 0.0017 in. wide 6 and the maximum size of colloidal particles is about 0.0001 mm., or 0.000004 in.7 Fineness must be
further judged by precipitation tests, to determine the amount that the
mud will subside or the amount of free \vater that will come to the top
of the mud after a standard length of time (24 hr. is recommended as
giving satisfactory indications, and dilution is not desirable). Note that
settling tests may be used for two purposes; to determine percentage of
"sand" or other coarse constituents, and to determine to what extent the
remaining solids are of colloidal nature.
Consistency
~/rrERE/v778L
/9(?E.5.5(/R
HALLAN N. MAHSH
is"
Characteristics Desired
U. R. Bur. Stds.
240
Ch('miHh'~',
1,733.
H)26-28.
New York.
241
HALLAN N. MARSH
Better methods for treating mud and controlling its properties are
coming into use. One of the best known is the use of special materials
, 100'70 A
7S1>A&W[."
50
45
//
..... /
--~:;;;-~---
---1<0
FIG.
that give special properties. With such special materials, muds having
practically any combination of qualities can be made. For example,
Fig. 3 presents curves showing that mud having any reasonable combination of viscosity and weight can be made from the proper mixture
of two well-known prepared materials. Similar results, ~overing a
narrower range, can be secured from combinations of various native muds.
Chemical Reagents
242
The nature of the water used in mixing and thinning has a remarkable
bearing on the properties of mud. Waters good enough for domestic use
may contain enough dissolved impurities to produce surprising effects.
This is illustrated by Fig, 4, which shows graphically the results of
precipitation tests of four different mud materials with water from 10
sources. Two of the materials (B and C) precipitated badly in all
waters, while material A settled badly in water No.7 but not at all in
others. Material D, which is much like A in many other respects,
precipitated badly in several waters that did not precipitate A, and
H. Clark: Personal communication.
.\lexarujpr: Colloid ChpmiRtry, Ed. :~, 108. New York, 1926---28.
Ca.talogue Co.
15 G. Fisher, Uencral Petroleulll Corpn. of California.
16 J. R. Ruman: Gp. cit., 48.
17 P. M. TraviR: np. cit., 108.
13,T,
14
,r.
Chemical
243
HALLAN N. MARSH
/1
""
-i
ffr?TR
"I
")
'\j..
'<)
III
to..
Q;)
0-
IIIIIII~III
1=111111111
1111111111
I1I1111111
MUDS.
48 hr. settling.
244
1.1'(';11,1111'111, (due 1,0 olltel' lI11fa\'orahk (,olldilioll~), \v:I~ I('~~ t Iiall half
of what it had b('(~ll hefon~.
The vi~cosity of a mud is said to be largely dependent upon the
number of colloidal particles per unit volume and almost independent of
the size of the particles (so long as they are colloidal). For two muds
made to the same viscosity, the one having the larger particles should
therefore have the higher specific gravity. Table 2, giving the percentage
of solids and specific gravities of muds all made to the same viscosity
from four materials, in ten different waters, shows that for the same
viscosity different amounts of material are needed in different waters
and different gravities result.
TABLE
Well----------
Location-----
Well
Mud
-------------------
I V's
: Sand:
Weight, ! it-' (Set- ,
Status : Lb. per ICS!c_Y' ,tling).
: Cu. Ft. nds
Per i
i 0
" Cent. Ii
Date
Depth.
Ft.
Casing
:
5-12-30
5-13-30
5-14-30
5-1.5-30
5-17-30
5-20-30
5-23-30
I
I
,
'
I.
'
.---c------~-
----~~---
5-28-30 i
5-:l9-30 i
5-30-30 I
5-31-30'
6- 1-30 I
6- 5-30 I
6- 6-30!
6- 8-30:
6- 9-30!
- - - - - - - - - ---' -
2066
Coring
Coring
Coring
Coring
Coring
Reaming
Coring
--
i Coring
at 240' I Coring
at 240 ' : Coring
at 240' ' Reaming i
at 240' Coring I
at 240' Reaming'
at 240' : Coring I
at 240' ! Coring I
at 240' ! Reaming i
at
240' Coring I
- - - I _ _ _~
Averagel since u;sing treated wa!ter ...... .
2112 i 18"
2151
18"
2151. 18"
2198! 18"
219\) I 18"
2211: 18"
2301
18 "
2366' 18"
2377
18"
- - - - - -- - - ,I
Bbl.
per
Hr.
78
75
74
75
76
76
75
5-27-30!
Remarks
Loss
I, 31
I
!
,
!
17
18
25
30
25
23
26
34
23.4 i
1_-
______
23
76
75
77
77.5
70.5
77.5
77
75.5
77
76.5
34
30
37
35
43
28
iI 30
41
j 43
i 37
i 41
41
35
: 42
37
I
'38.6
,
' None
None:
None
! None
: None
i None'
None
None
112
, 12
110
11~
water.
I,
15
! 12
9
Using untreated
None
None
None
None
None
None
i
I
None
10.6
245
HALLAN N. MARSH
TABLE
2
:3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Material B
--
"'~at.t'r
13.1
12.6
13.0
12.4
12.5
13.1
18.8
17.2
15.9
10.6
8prc.
i
Grav.
1.07
1.08
1.08
1.08
1.07
1.06
1.13
1.10
1.09
1.08
---
Solids,
Per Cent.
Material C
Material D
I
I
41.6
37.6
35.5
40.7
36.4
37.6
42.4
38.4
35.5
37.4
Spec.
Grav.
I Solids, I
, Per Cent. I
Spec.
Grav.
Solids,
, Per Cent.
Spec.
Grav
1.;{2
1.31
1.30
1.32
1.30
1.33
1.33
1.33
1.32
1.32
i 37.4
39.5
38.2
39.6
37.4
40.2
45.0
36.8
36.0
34.3
1.32
1.33
1.31
1.32
1.39
1.33
1.37
1.29
1.30
1.29
i
I
4.3
6.0
4.8
4.3
6.2
4.6
7.5
3.9
4.8
6.1
1.02
1.03
1.03
1.01
1.01
1.02
1.05
1.03
1.03
1.04
and Richards 21 both give the necessary data and equations. Taggart
points out (p. 583) that the effectiveness of a settling ditch is independent
of its depth and also of its ratio of length to breadth. It horizontal area
or product of length by breadth determines its effectiveness.
Finkey 22 advocates the rising current classifier as opposed to the
horizontal current classifier. For liquid muds the suction pit or an
auxiliary might be made an effective rising current classifier by adding
a conductor pipe to take the flow from the ditch nearly to the bottom of
the pit, and taking suction from a substantially higher level. Of course,
provision must be made and used for removing settlings from the pit if it
is to be effective. Suction pipes are now sometimes arranged so that
they can be raised or lowered, but all too often they are let down nearly
to the bottom of the pit and left there. As a result no rising current
classification is possible, and what sand is separated by horizontal flow is
picked up eventually by the suction.
Unfortunately for the success of ditch and pit classification, many
muds (probably the best muds) gel or otherwise become plastic when
velocity of flow becomes small. Thus reduction of velocity, which
otherwise would permit settling, prevents it. With such materials it is
found that there is a certain intermediate velocity of flow at which settling
is most nearly satisfactory. This has been noted by Benjamin 23 in other
industries. With some muds this is evidenced in connection with rotary
McGraw-Hill Book Co.
Trans. by
Holln, Mo., 1!l30. Mo. School of Mines
21
22
246
22.6
0.40
0.31
2.74
1.46
n.').<l!)
From Foot of
Ditch
22 .5
o.IS
0.1:3
2.44
1..';1
n5.74
247
HALLAN N. MAHSH
( 'l'Iilnjll(!ill fI
4.-B,'ffediveness of Centrifuge
Sample
Before
Centrifuging
After
Centrifuging
Tailings
1.35
29.2
4S.1
1. 24
27.0
36.6
1.67
50+
65.3
1.12
11. 22
5.245
15.60
8.89
57.925
0.00
0.095
0.105
2.n5
6.80
90.21i.'i
1.345
14.89
7.5.')5
]8.425
8.015
49.77
248
Before
After
Screening
Screening
Over
Screen
32.9
32.7
69.1
0.15
2.20
2.45
5.90
3.70
85.60
73
25
15
Trace
1.95
2.10
6.30
3.15
86.50
73
25
10
32.60
34.80
1.10
2.75
0.50
28.25
More interesting, perhaps, than the data given above is the fact that
during 11 weeks use of this screen the mud has never been completely
replaced, and no appreciable volume of cuttings has accumulated in the
HALLAN N. MARSH
249
While there are many points in the selection and use of drilling mud
that are open to controversy, there are also many about which there is
little doubt. The application of facts and principles that are known is
resulting in a rapid improvement in general practice and there is little
doubt that further intensive investigation will result in still further
improvements in practice. Such improvements should greatly reduce
cases of blow-outs and stuck pipe, greatly increase life of pump parts and
reduce expenditures for purchase, hauling and disposal of mud.
2O.r.