Professional Documents
Culture Documents
-versusDAMAGES
Danny, Jim and Gina,
Defendants.
x- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x
MEMORANDUM
FOR THE DEFENDANTS
For they have sown the
wind, and they shall reap the
whirlwind: it hath no stalk:
the bud shall yield no meal: if
so be it yield, the strangers
shall swallow it up. - Hosea
8:7
WITH ALL DUE RESPECT TO THIS HONORABLE COURT,
defendants, through the undersigned counsel, submits this
Memorandum for the Defendants and states that:
STATEMENT OF THE PARTIES
Plaintiffs Linda is of legal age, widow of deceased
Dave, a Filipino citizen, with residence at Pico, La Trinidad,
Benguet.
Defendants Jim and Gina, are both of legal age,
residents of Mankayan, Benguet, Filipino citizens, and with
postal address at Rm. 307, Jose Miguel Bldg., #1 Labsan St.,
cor. Yandoc St., Baguio City. They are businesspersons who
have employed defendant Danny as their driver.
Defendant Danny is likewise of legal age, single, a
Filipino Citizen, and may be served court processes at the
same address of his co-defendants indicated above. He is
the employed driver of his co-defendants and is the holder of
a Professional Drivers License.
THE CASE
Plaintiffs filed this civil case for DAMAGES against the
Defendants, which arose due to a motor vehicle collision
which happened at Km. 5, La Trinidad, Benguet.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
On 1 November 2009, Jim and Gina informed Danny that he
was to pick up poultry feeds at San Fernando, La Union,
which they would use in the business of the former. This was
a usual task assigned to Danny, he being a seasoned,
professional, and veteran driver of Jim and Gina, despite his
disability. Around 6:00 in the evening, before departing for
San Fernando, La Union, Jim reminded Danny to carefully
check and inspect the condition of the Cargo Hino Truck,
which Danny would be driving, such as the chassis, engine,
brakes, oil, and lights of the vehicle. Jim also reminded
Danny to observe proper road courtesy and to observe traffic
rules.
Danny did as he was told by carefully and
meticulously checking and ensuring that the vehicle was
indeed road worthy for the trip.
At about 7:00 in the evening, Danny started his travel from
Mankayan, Benguet, accompanied by his helper, who was
seated at the passengers seat beside him. At around 9:00
in the evening, Danny and his helper stopped to rest and
have dinner at the Saddle somewhere along the Halsema
Highway. Due to his difficulty to digest food, he had to drink
one jigger of gin for appetizer and to help him properly
digest his food. Danny did not drink more than one jigger as
he was aware that he would still be driving to San Fernando,
La Union. After eating, they continued their travel.
At around 11:00 11:30 in the evening, Danny and his
helper were already at La Trinidad, Benguet, where he
noticed that the road was wet due to the persistent drizzling.
Although there was light traffic, Danny lessened his speed
because he was fully aware that he was in the town proper
vicinity of La Trinidad, Benguet, and due to the slippery
condition of the road.
STATEMENT OF ARGUMENTS/DISCUSSIONS
I.
hanging on the jeepney. Had it not been for such act, the
death of the deceased would have been prevented by
merely alighting from the jeepney the moment that there
were more jeepneys which were plying the town proper.
Therefore, it can be reasonable concluded that the
deceased was in Damnum Absque Injuria or has
reasonably assumed the risk that he might suffer
damages due to his hanging on the back of the jeepney
driven by Lucky.
Even if for the sake of argument that Danny was indeed
negligent, the acts of Lucky and the deceased would be
construed as Contributory Negligence, if not the
immediate and proximate cause of his injury.
Article 2179 reads as follows:
When the plaintiffs negligence was the immediate and
proximate cause of his injury, he cannot recover
damages. But if his negligence was only contributory,
the immediate and proximate cause of the injury being
the defendants lack of due care, the plaintiff may
recover damages, but the courts shall mitigate the
damages to be awarded.
Further, it cannot be said that the accident was due to the
lack of due care and diligence of Danny. As stated above,
Danny exercised due diligence while driving the vehicle
because of his experience and expertise and the
circumstances revolving the facts of this case.
The underlying precept on contributory negligence is that
a plaintiff who is partly responsible for his own injury
should not be entitled to recover damages in full but must
bear the consequences of his own negligence. The
defendant must thus be held liable only for the damages
actually caused by his negligence.5
As admitted by the plaintiffs, Lucky did not immediately
signal that he was about to make a right turn.
Section 44 of R.A. No. 4136 provides:
5 Syki v. Begasa, G.R. No. 149149, 23 October 2003, 414 SCRA 237, 244.
Section 44.Signals on starting, stopping or turning. (a) The driver of any vehicle upon a highway, before
starting, stopping or turning from a direct line, shall first
see that such movement can be made in safety, and if
any pedestrian may be affected by such movement,
shall give a clearly audible signal by sounding the horn,
and whenever the operation of any other vehicle
approaching or following may be affected by such
movement, shall give a signal plainly visible to the
driver of such other vehicles of the intention to make
such movement.
(b) The signal herein required shall be given by means
of extending the hand and arm beyond the left side of
the vehicle, or by an approved mechanical or electrical
signal device.
PRAYER
WHEREFORE, premises considered, it is respectfully prayed of
this Honorable Court to render judgment in favor of the defendants and
against the plaintiff, DISMISSING the case for lack of merit.
Other reliefs just and equitable under the premises are likewise
prayed for.
Done in 12th day of February 2014, in the City of Baguio for La
Trinidad, Benguet.
CHRISTIAN B. AMISTAD
PTR No.2673687; 04 February 2011; Baguio City
IBP OR No. 841045; 10 January 2011; Baguio-Benguet
Roll No. 57299; 5 May 2009; Manila
MCLE Compliance No. III 0018203; 4 August 2010
Copy furnished:
Atty. DAEL A. LONGBOAN
Counsel for the Plaintiff
Copies of the foregoing memorandum were served upon the above-mentioned counsel
and filed to this Honorable Court through registered mail personal service being impracticable
due to time and distance constraints.
CHRISTIAN B. AMISTAD