Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Dula II
Article/Crime
Article 246 Parricide
Act Punishable/Elements/Definitions
Elements:
1. That a person is killed
2. That the deceased is killed by the
accused.
3. That the deceased is the father, mother,
or child, whether legitimate or
illegitimate, or a legitimate other
ascendant or other descendant, or the
legitimate spouse, of the accused
Article 247
Death or
physical injuries
inflicted under
exceptional
circumstances
Notes
Relationship of the offender with the victim is the essential element
of this crime.
The other ascendant or descendant must be legitimate
He who kills an illegitimate grandfather or an illegitimate grandson
is not guilty of parricide, but of simple homicide or murder as the
case may be.
The father, mother or child may be legitimate or illegitimate
The child should not be less than three years old
The spouse must be legitimatewhen a Moro has three wives and
he killed his third wife, he cannot be held liable for parricide
Marriages among Muslims or among members of the ethnic cultural
communities performed in accordance with their customs or
rites or practices are valid
Relationship must be allegedwife of victim cannot be convicted of
parricide if charged only with murder
A stranger, who cooperates and takes part in the commission of the
crime of parricide, is not guilty of parricide but homicide or
murder, as the case may be.
The accused must be a legally married person
The wife is entitled to the benefits of Article 247
The word surprise means to come upon suddenly and unexpectedly
Surprising the spouse or young daughter in the act of sexual
intercourse, indispensable requisite.
Article 247 is not applicable when the accused did not see his spouse
in the act of sexual intercourse with another person.
But it is enough that the circumstances show reasonably that the
carnal act is being committed or has just been committed
The killing or inflicting of physical injuries must be in the act of
sexual intercourse or immediately thereafter.
The discovery, the escape, the pursuit and the killing must all form
part of one continuous act.
The killing must be the direct by-product of the accuseds rage
The law, when the circumstances provided by this article are
present, considers the spouse or parent as acting in a justified
burst of passion.
The accused cannot be held liable for injuries sustained by third
persons as a result thereof. (People v. Abarca)
Not applicable to person who consented to the infidelity of spouse
or who facilitated the prostitution of his wife or daughter.
Act Punishable/Elements/Definitions
Murder is the unlawful killing of any person
which is not parricide or infanticide, provided
that any of the following circumstances is
present:
1. With treachery, taking advantage of superior
strength, with the aid of armed men, or
employing means to weaken the defense or of
means or persons to insure or afford impunity.
2. In consideration of a price, reward, or
promise.
3. By means of inundation, fire, poison,
explosion, shipwreck, stranding of a vessel,
derailment or assault upon a street car or
locomotive, fall of an airship, by means of
motor vehicles, or with the use of any other
means involving great waste and ruin.
4. On occasion of any of the calamities
enumerated in the preceding paragraph, or of
an earthquake, eruption of a volcano,
destructive cyclone, epidemic or other public
calamity.
5. With evident premeditation.
6. With cruelty, by deliberately and inhumanly
augmenting the suffering of the victim, or
outraging or scoffing at his person or corpse.
Elements:
1. That a person was killed
2. That the accused kill him
3. That the killing was attended by any of
the qualifying circumstances
mentioned in Article 248
4. The killing is not parricide or homicide
The word outraging means to commit an
extremely vicious or deeply insulting act.
The word scoffing means to jeer, and implies
Notes
In murder, the victim must be killed to consummate the crime. If
the victim is not killed, it is either attempted or frustrated
murder.
The offender must have intent to kill to be liable for murder
committed by means of fire, or other means enumerated in par. 3
of Article 248.
Killing a person by means of fire is murder only when there is actual
design to kill on the part of the offender (US v. Burns)
But killing a person with treachery is murder even if there is no
intent to kill.
Rules for the application of the circumstances which qualify the
killing to murder:
a. That murder will exist with only one of the circumstances
described in Article 248. When more than one of said
circumstances are present, the others must be considered as
generic aggravating.
b. That when the other circumstances are absorbed or included
in one qualifying circumstance, they cannot be considered as
generic aggravating.
c. That any of the qualifying circumstances enumerated in
Article 248 must be alleged in the information.
The killing of the victims is qualified with treachery, when the
shooting was sudden and unexpected, and the victims were not
in a position to defend themselves. (People v. Aguilar)
Treachery is present when the shooting of the victim with a carbine
is sudden and unexpected to the point of incapacitating the
victim to repel or escape it. And where the hands of the victim
were raised as ordered by the accused who fired at him without
any risk to the accused is treachery is present.
An attack made by a man with a weapon upon a girl which resulted
in her death is murder because the offender had taken advantage
of superior strength. His sex and weapon gave him superiority of
strength.
If the accused had companions who were armed when he
committed the crime, this circumstance is considered present.
A person who suddenly throws a cloak over the head of his
opponent and while in this situation he kills him or one who
suddenly cast sand or dirt upon the eyes of the victim and then
kills him, evidently employs means which weaken the defense.
Article 249
Homicide
Act Punishable/Elements/Definitions
a showing of irreverence.
RT
RP if victim is
under 12 years of
age
Notes
It seems that one who covered his face with handkerchief before
killing his victim is liable for murder, because he employed
means to insure or afford impunity.
When the Code declares that homicide committed by means of fire
shall be deemed murder, it is intended that there should be an
actual design to kill and that the use of fire should be purposely
adopted as a means to that end.
Treachery and premeditation are inherent in murder by poison
Killing a person on the occasion of inundation, shipwreck, eruption
of a volcano, epidemic etc., or any other public calamity, when
taken advantage of by the offender, qualifies the crime to
murder.
The circumstance of evident premeditation is present and it
qualifies the killing of a person to murder, when the prosecution
proves 1) the time when the offender determined (conceived) to
kill his victim; 2) an act of the offender manifestly indicating that
he clung to his determination to kill his victim; and 3) a sufficient
lapse of time (at least three hours) between the determination
and the execution of the killing.
There is cruelty when other injuries or wound are inflicted
deliberately by the offender, which are not necessary for the
killing of the victim. The victim must be alive when the other
injuries or wounds are inflicted.
The mere decapitation of the victims head constitutes outraging at
the corpse of the victim(People v.Whisenhunt).
Intent to kill is conclusively presumed when death resulted.
Evidence of intent to kill is important only in an attempted or
frustrated homicide. If there is no intent to kill on the part of the
offender, he is liable for physical injuries.
Usually intent to kill is shown by the kind of weapon used by the
offender and the parts of the victims body at which the weapon
was aimed, as shown by the wounds inflicted.
Intent to kill must be proved beyond reasonable doubt. The
inference of intent to kill should not be drawn in the absence of
circumstances sufficient to prove such intent beyond reasonable
doubt.
The killing must not be justified
That the death of the deceased was due to his refusal to be operated
on, not a defense.
Act Punishable/Elements/Definitions
Accidental homicide -- is the death of the
person brought about by a lawful act
performed with proper care and skill, and
without homicidal intent.
Corpus delicti means the actual
commission of the crime charged. Means
that the crime was actually perpetrated,
and does not refer to the body of the
murder person.
Article 250
Penalty for
frustrated
parricide,
murder or
homicide
Article 251
Death caused in
a tumultuous
affray
Elements:
1. That there be several persons;
2. That they did not compose groups
organized for the common purpose of
assaulting and attacking each other
reciprocally;
3. That these several persons quarreled
and assaulted one another in a
confused and tumultuous manner.
4. That someone is killed in the course of
the affray
5. That it cannot be ascertained who
actually killed the deceased
6. That the person or persons who
inflicted serious physical injuries or
who used violence can be identified.
Article 252
Physical injuries
inflicted in a
tumultuous
affray
Elements:
1. That there is tumultuous affray as
referred to in the preceding article.
2. That a participant or some participants
thereof suffer serious physical injuries
or physical injuries of a less serious
nature only
Notes
In the absence of clear proof of any circumstance that would qualify
as murder the killing of the deceased, the guilty person should be
sentence only for homicide
The offender should not be the father, mother or child, or legitimate
other ascendant or legitimate other descendant or spouse of the
deceased for otherwise the crime would be parricide.
When the act of mortally wounding and the fact of suicide by the
victim concur
Use of unlicensed firearm is an aggravating circumstance.
Courts may impose a penalty two degrees lower for frustrated
parricide, murder or homicide.
Courts may impose a penalty three degrees lower for attempted
parricide, murder or homicide.
An attempt on, or a conspiracy against, the life of the Chief
Executive, etc. is punishable by death
Article 253
Giving
assistance to
suicide
Act Punishable/Elements/Definitions
3. That the person responsible therefore
cannot be identified
4. That all those who appear to have used
violence upon the person of the
offended party are known.
Acts punishable:
1. By assisting another to commit suicide,
whether the suicide is consummated or
not.
2. By lending his assistance to another to
commit suicide to the extent of doing
the killing himself
Euthanasia is not lending assistance to
suicide. A doctor who resorts to killing his
patient may be liable for murder.
Article 254
Discharge of
Firearms
Elements:
1. That the offender discharges a firearm
against or at another person.
2. That the offender has no intention to
kill that person
Article 255
Infanticide
Elements:
1. That a child was killed
2. That the deceased child was less than
three days (72 hours) of age
3. That the accused kill the said child.
Infanticide may be defined as the killing of any
Article 256
Intentional
abortion
Act Punishable/Elements/Definitions
child less than three days of age, whether the
killer is the parent or grandparent, any other
relative of the child, or a stranger.
RT First way
PM Second way
PC med to max
thirdway
Article 257
Unintentional
abortion
Pc min to med
Notes
Delinquent mother who claims concealing dishonor must
be of good reputation. Thus, if she is a prostitute, she is not
entitled to a lesser penalty because she has no honor to
conceal
Stranger cooperating with the mother in killing a child less
than three days old is guilty of infanticide also but the
penalty is that for murder
No crime of infanticide is committed where the child was
born dead, or although born alive, it could not sustain an
independent life when it was killeda foetus about six
months old cannot subsist by itself, outside the maternal
womb.
The person who intentionally caused the abortion is liable
under article 256. The woman is liable under Article 258, if
she consented to the abortion caused on her. If she did not
consent to the abortion caused on her, she is not liable.
If the foetus could sustain an independent life, after its
separation from the maternal womb, and it is killed the
crime is infanticide.
Article 258
Abortion
practiced by the
woman herself
or by her
parents
Article 259
Abortion
practiced by a
physician or
midwife and
dispensing of
abortive
Article 260
Responsibility
of participants
in a Duel
Act Punishable/Elements/Definitions
abortion
3. That the violence is intentionally
exerted
4. That as a result of the violence of the
foetus dies, either in the womb or after
having been expelled therefrom
Elements:
1. That there is a pregnant woman who
has suffered abortion
2. That abortion was intended
3. That the abortion is caused by:
a. The pregnant woman herself;
b. Any other person, with her
consent; or
c. Any of her parents, with her
consent for the purpose of
concealing her dishonor
Elements:
1. That there is a pregnant woman who
has suffered abortion
2. The abortion was intended
3. That the offender, who must be a
physician or midwife, causes, or assists
in causing, the abortion
4. That said physician or midwife takes
advantage of his or her scientific
knowledge or skill.
As to the pharmacist the elements are:
1. That the offender is a pharmacist
2. That there is no proper prescription
from a physician
3. That the offender dispenses any
abortive
Duel is a formal or regular combat previously
concerted between two parties in the presence
of two or more seconds of lawful age on each
side, who make the selection of arms and fix all
Notes
that the woman was pregnant.
No intention to cause, no violence Article 256 or 257 does
not apply no abortion of any kind.
PC med to max
par. 1
PC min to med
par. 2
PC med to max
par. 3
The penalty
provided for in
Article 256 in the
maximum.
Arresto Mayor
any pharmacist
who shall dispense
any abortive
RT First Kind
1.
Penalty provided
for second kind
Article 261
Challenging to a
Duel
Article 262
Mutilation
Penalty
(physical injuries)
Acts punished:
1. By killing ones adversary in a duel
2. By inflicting upon such adversary
physical injuries
3. By making a combat although no
physical injuries have been inflicted
Acts punished:
1. By challenging another to a duel
2. By inciting another to give or accept a
challenge to a duel
3. By scoffing at or decrying another
publicly for having refused to accept a
challenge to fight a duel
Arresto Mayor
Third Kind
RT to RP First
kind
Article 263
Serious Physical
Injuries
Act Punishable/Elements/Definitions
the other conditions of the fight.
It is committed
1. By wounding
2. By beating
3. By assaulting
4. By administering injurious substance
(Art. 264)
What are serious physical injuries?
1. When the injured person becomes
insane, imbecile, impotent or blind in
consequence of the physical injuries
PC minimum
PM med to max
Second kind
Notes
2. The seconds, as accomplices
The penalty is reclusion temporal even if physical injuries were
inflicted.
Act Punishable/Elements/Definitions
inflicted.
2. When the injured person a) loses the
use of speech or the power to hear or
smell or loses an eye, a hand, a foot, an
arm, or a leg, or b) loses the use of any
such member or c) becomes
incapacitated for the work in which he
is habitually engaged, in consequence
of the physical injuries inflicted.
3. When the person injured a) becomes
deformed or b) loses any other member
of his body or c) loses the use there of
or d) becomes ill or incapacitated for
the performance of the work in which
he is habitually engaged for more than
90 days, in consequence of the physical
injuries inflicted.
4. When the injured person becomes ill or
incapacitated for labor for more than
30 days but not more than 90 days, as a
result of the physical injuries inflicted
Qualified serious physical injuries if the
offense is committed against any of the persons
enumerated in the article defining the crime of
parricide or with the attendance of any of the
circumstances mention in the article defining
the crime of murder, the law provides for
higher penalties
Article 264
Administering
injurious
substance or
beverages
Elements:
1. That the offender inflicted upon
another any serious physical injury.
2. That it was done by knowingly
administering to him any injurious
Same as that of
Article 263
Notes
The blindness must be of two eyes and must be complete.
Mere weakness of vision is not contemplated.
Explanation for Paragraph 2:
It must be loss of power to hear of both ears. If there is loss
of power to hear of one ear only, it is under paragraph 3.
Loss of use of hand or incapacity for usual work must be
permanent.
All those mentioned in paragraph 2 are principal members
of the body.
Explanation for Paragraph 3:
Paragraph 3 covers any member which is not principal
member of the body.
It is a serious physical injury when the offended party
becomes deformed.
By deformity it is meant physical ugliness, permanent and
definite abnormality and must be conspicuous and visible.
Loss of one tooth which impaired appearance is deformity.
Loss of both outer ears constitutes deformity and also loss
of the power to hear. If there is loss of power to hear of both
ears as a result both outer ears, the crime should be
punished under par. 2 of Article 263
There is illness for a certain period of time, when the wound
inflicted did not heal within that period.
Explanation for Paragraph 4:
Paragraph 4 speaks of incapacity for any kind of labor.
Hospitalization for more than 30 days may mean either
illness or incapacity for labor for more than 30 days.
When the category of the offense of serious physical injuries
depends on the period of the illness or incapacity for labor,
there must be evidence of the length of that period;
otherwise the offense is only slight physical injuries
Lessening of efficiency due to injury is not incapacity
Serious physical injuries by excessive chastisement by
parents are not qualified.
It is frustrated murder when there is intent to kill.
If the accused did not know of the injurious nature of the
substances he administered, he is not liable under this
article.
Administering injurious substance means introducing into
Act Punishable/Elements/Definitions
substances or beverages or by taking
advantage of his weakness of mind or
credulity
3. That he had no intent to kill
Article 265
Less serious
physical injuries
Article 266
Slight Physical
Injuries
Article 266-A
Less serious
physical injuries
Arresto Mayor
Qualified less
serious physical
injuries under
first kind an
additional P500
Notes
the body the substance.
Article 264 does not apply when the physical injuries that
result are less serious or slight. They will be treated under
Article 265 or Article 266, as the case may be.
By taking advantage of his weakness of mind or credulity
may takes place in the case of witchcraft, philters,
magnetism, etc.
Medical attendance or incapacity is require in less serious
physical injuries
The crime is less serious physical injuries even if there was
no incapacity, but the medical treatment was for 13 days
It is only slight physical injury when there is no medical
attendance or incapacity for labor.
Shall require refers to the actual medical attendance.
There must be proof as to the period required medical
attendance.
PC min to med if
under Second kind
Act Punishable/Elements/Definitions
1. Rape through sexual intercourse
without the consent of the woman
(Traditional Rape) Par. 1
2. Rape through sexual assault. Par. 2
Elements of Traditional Rape
1. That the offender is a man;
2. That the offender had carnal knowledge
of a woman;
3. That such act is accomplished under
any of the following circumstances:
a. By using force or intimidation; or
b. When the woman is deprived of
reason or otherwise unconscious;
c. By means of fraudulent
machination or grave abuse of
authority; or
d. When the woman is under 12 years
of age or is demented.
Elements of Rape under paragraph 2:
1. That the offender commits an act of
sexual assault;
2. That the act of sexual assault is
committed by any of the following
means;
a. By inserting his penis in another
persons mouth or anal orifice; or
b. By inserting any instrument or
object into the genital or anal
orifice of another person;
3. That he act of sexual assault is
accomplished under any of the
following circumstances:
a. By using force or intimidation
b. When the woman is deprived of
reason or otherwise unconscious;
c. By means of fraudulent
machination or grave abuse of
authority;
d. When the woman is under 12 years
of age or demented
Rape committed
with the use of
deadly weapon or
by two or more
persons
Par. 1 RP to death
Par. 2 PM to RT
Rape where victim
becomes insane
Par. 1 RP to death
Par. 2 RT
Attempted rape
and homicide is
committed
Par. 1 RP to death
Par. 2 RT to RP
Notes
referred to as rape by sexual intercourse
Penetration, even partial is necessary. The slightest
penetration is enough. Proof of emission is not necessary.
The touching of labia majora or the labia minora of the
pudendum constitutes consummated rape.
Jurisprudence dictates that labia majora must be entered
for rape to be consummated, and not merely for the penis to
stroke the surface of the female organ. Thus, a grazing of
the surface of the female organ or touching the mons pubis
of the pudendum is not sufficient to constitute
consummated rape. Absent any showing of the slightest
penetration of the female organ, i.e., touching of either labia
of the pudendum by the penis there can be no
consummated rape; at most, it can only be attempted rape
if not acts of lasciviousness (People v. Campuhan)
If there is no sexual intercourse and only acts of lewdness
are performed, the crime may be rape through sexual
assault under par. 2 or acts of lasciviousness under Article
336.
A broken hymen is not an essential element of rape
Exact date of sexual assault not an essential element of
rape.
Paragraph 2.
Act Punishable/Elements/Definitions
Consummated Rape it is not essential that
there be a complete penetration of the female
organ; neither is it essential that there be a
rupture of the hymen. It is enough that the
labia of the female organ was penetrated. The
slightest penetration of the labia consummates
the crime of rape (People v. Oscar)
There is no crime of frustrated rape
Attempted rape was committed by the accused
after raising the dress of the woman then asleep
and placing himself on top of her, and when the
woman was awakened the accused threatened
her with a knife, but because of her continued
shouting and offering of resistance, a neighbor
came to her rescue.
Statutory Rape: When the girl is under 12 years
of age
Statutory Rape
Where the offended party is less than twelve years of age,
rape is committed although she consented to the sexual act.
Sexual intercourse with a nine-year-old girl is rape
Rape is committed even if the girl under 12 years is a
prostitute
Burden of Proof in Statutory Rape
The prosecution carries the burden of proving:
1. The age of the complainant
2. The identity of the accused
3. The sexual intercourse between the accused and the
complainant
The fact that the offended party may have been of an unchaste
character constitutes no defense in a charge of rape, provided
that the illicit relations were committed with force and violence
(People v. Blanco)
Rape with homicide and Robbery with Rape are special complex
crimes.
Rape with homicide Illustrations
1. Committed by the accused who, while raping a 6-year old
girl, strangled her to death in order to silence her
2. The rapist who was suffering from gonorrhea, infected the
victim who died as a result
When the homicide is committed NOT by reason or on the occasion
of the rape the accused murdered two sisters. As the elder sister
was dying, the accused had carnal intercourse with her. This is not
special complex crime of rape with homicide since the victim was
already at the threshold of death when she was ravished. That
Act Punishable/Elements/Definitions
Notes
bestiality may be regarded either as a form of ignominy causing
disgrace or as a form of cruelty which aggravated the murder of the
elder sister.