Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Traditionally, investments into DCO infrastructure account for a percentage of the organizations total
revenue. The drop in demand for products and services has, however, made it imperative to relook at
these investments. Most companies have already built in additional datacenter capacity in terms of
servers, storage systems, network devices, and cooling equipment. The resultant increase in
operational expenditure and the already high capex has placed immense pressure on the CIO to
rationalize cost and increase return on investments.
This article proffers a peek into some of the best practices organizations can leverage to recession-
proof data center operations. The article will look at the various cost levers that CIOs can leverage to
transform the data center cost structure. It will provide an insight into initiatives that can reduce opex
and free capital, which organizations can then invest into innovative measures that will enable
business continuity and help improve IT agility to respond quickly to market dynamics.
In the initial phase, the audit team should identify all the DCO assets deployed across the
organization to enable easier analysis of overall assets utilization and gain greater clarity into annual
spending on servers and storage devices, network components, software licenses, applications,
databases, and operating systems on each server. A plan can then be prepared to rationalize
overspending on underutilized assets without impacting business continuity or asset performance.
Physical infrastructure including data center hardware like servers, storage devices, etc, forms
another large cost component. Many organizations underutilize existing assets leading to
consumption of a large portion of the organization's IT resources. In fact, research by analysts firms
indicates that the typical data center is only utilized to 30% of its capacity. Organizations should
analyze utilization rates and identify opportunities for data center consolidation.
Hosting applications sourced from different vendors on multiple servers can lead to data replication.
This, in turn, results in the need for more storage and thereby higher storage costs. Studies indicate
that storage utilization rate in most companies is less than 50 percent. Consolidation can, reduce
storage complexity, increase availability and utilization, improve scalability, and reduce ownership costs.
Data center consolidation can, however, have a severe impact on the enterprise network. This
impact needs to be evaluated and appropriate measures taken to ensure that there is sufficient
network bandwidth to handle network traffic.
Virtualization can also be leveraged to resolve the issue of storage underutilization, reduce over-
provisioning of storage devices, data duplication and rationalize the number of disks and other
storage media required by the enterprise. Enterprises can make smarter use of power and cooling by
leveraging virtualization to retire underutilized servers. Even the time spent setting up and
configuring virtual machines is much lower than that taken for deploying standard hardware. Other
benefits include improved efficiency, a reduction in power and space consumption, reduction in
spend on new hardware, and equally importantly, simplification of data management.
Organizations can achieve significant benefits in terms of increasing agility, service quality and
reducing costs by re-engineering operational processes and investing in automation. Process
automation replaces manual execution of repetitive functions, reduces errors and allows
administrators to focus on value-added functions that ensure continuous high-quality service
delivery. By implementing data center automation software organizations can significantly reduce
data center operating costs, improve service quality, increase efficiencies, enhance compliance and
security, and realize huge time savings while performing routine data center processes. Automation
can also go a long way toward removing human error from critical data center processes.
Aligning operations to IT management frameworks like the IT Infrastructure Library (ITIL) ensure that
all IT services, including those associated with the data center, are delivered as efficiently as
possible. Most vendors today would have adopted ITILV3.0 best practices to avail built-in process
maturity and assured productivity gains i.e. evolve from a technology centric to a more business-
centric IT organization. At this level of maturity, IT is measured in terms of its contribution to the
business and all services are measured by its ability to add value.
This approach can effectively dispel the twin dangers of overcapacity and inflexibility. While the
former can prove cost-prohibitive the latter can prove instrumental in hampering future growth. Such
services are generally billed on the basis of the amount of resources consumed. Hence, aside from
the higher flexibility, the usage-based pricing model allows customers to pay as they grow.
This strategy can help organizations significantly reduce operational costs and realize quick payback
while dramatically simplifying complex infrastructure tasks like disaster recovery, capacity planning,
consolidation and provisioning. Additionally, third-party data center service providers will ensure that
they use the latest technology. This will provide organizations the advantage of leveraging the latest
technology to achieve faster service delivery and time-to-market without incurring the associated
incremental investments.
Studies have proved that a CIO administrating the entire datacenter from a particular geography can
potentially save anywhere between 35-40% in a year by embracing the global delivery model. Thereafter,
the company can expect year-on-year productivity gains of 8-10 percent. Thus, in a period of three years,
the organization can save 45-50% assuming that all kinds of services are being delivered out of a single
geography at the moment.
Organizations need to analyze the possibility of consolidating and outsourcing certain services. For
instance, would it be possible to consolidate monitoring as a function across all applications, servers,
databases, etc owned by the enterprise. The organization can then look at outsourcing that function.
Thereby, organizations can profit from the option of functional outsourcing or exercise the choice of
retaining assets while outsourcing the entire administration and management of the datacenter. This
can bring in considerable cost savings for the organization.
Co-location and remote hosting is another service that can save considerable amounts especially if
the organization is considering setting up a new data center. If the service offerings of a third-party
vendor is technologically advanced and makes economic sense as compared to running a facility
using in-house resources then the organization should contemplate opting for this solution.
opex. To effectively maintain their businesses, enterprises should streamline, automate, and
standardize processes to reduce data center-related costs, improve business efficiency, increase
innovation, and drive profitable business growth. As we have seen, enterprises can leverage
virtualization and consolidation opportunities in various areas including servers, applications, storage,
networks, people, resources and processes, and the actual physical locations of the data centers.
However, internal stakeholders need to be involved in this process to understand which resources
applications use and its usage patterns. Comprehensive planning is required to leverage the full
The stakeholder team should formulate a clear strategy to evolve to a next-generation data center
that operates more efficiently and delivers ever-increasing value to the business. The focus should be
on doing more with existing resources and becoming more effective or rationalizing existing
Vikram has over 22 years of experience in the IT and Industrial Automation industry in consulting,
pre-sales, solution development and customer management.
Contact: marketing@patni.com 25+ years in IT Services | 15000+ employees | SEI-CMMI Level 5 (V1.2) | P-CMM Level 3 | ISO 9001:2000