Professional Documents
Culture Documents
V.
1. Having finally been provided access to the Non-Price Proposals of the other Proposers
from the October 2008 RFP Process, the following documents are now submitted for the
Proposal of CALM Golf submitted to Duxbury on or about October 24, 2008.1 Attached
1
Attached is the cover letter dated January 15, 2009 purporting to enclose such
documents. There were no copies of any of the Non-Price Proposals included in the material
forwarded from Attorney Troy. Although the letter was dated January 15, 2009, it was not
postmarked until January 21, 2009 and it was received on January 23, 2009. Exhibit “F”
hereto as Exhibit “B” is a copy of the Non-Price Proposal of Robert Gunnerson
submitted to Duxbury on or about October 24, 2008. Attached hereto as Exhibit “C” is a
copy of the Non-Price Proposal of Eagles Nest Tree and Landscape submitted to Duxbury
on or about October 24, 2008. Attached hereto as Exhibit “D” is a copy of the Non-Price
Proposal of Steven Daley- Mark Stiles submitted to Duxbury on or about October 24,
2008. Exhibits A-D were seen for the first time today at Duxbury Town Hall at
11:30am.
2. Attached hereto as Exhibit “E” are the evaluations of CALM Golf prepared by the
evaluators, Gordon Cushing, William Dixon and Anthony Floreano with regard to the
3. According to the evaluators Dixon, Cushing and Floreano, CALM Golf was scored as
being “Highly Advantageous” in eight of twelve categories. CALM Golf received two
4. Attached as Exhibit “G” is an additional copy of the Criteria Evaluation Standards from
5. The evaluations of the proposals of Robert Gunnerson, Eagles Nest Tree and Landscape
and Steven Daley- Mark Stiles are attached hereto marked Exhibit “H”
6. CALM Golf in its proposal of October, 2008 did not identify any on site superintendent
whatsoever. [page68 of Exhibit “A” hereto]. Accordingly, CALM Golf could not
possibly have been rated as anything other than Unacceptable in the area of
Organizational Capability.
7. The proposal of CALM Golf could not have achieved even a rating above “Not
2
Advantageous” in the category of Relevant Experience. The specific language of the
Criteria Evaluation Standards found on page 6 of the RFP from the October 2008 process
states under “Not Advantageous” the following: “The firm’s personnel may have had
experience within the business of golf, or comparable business enterprise, but the
firm has less than three years experience.” [ See Exhibit “G” page 6 attached
hereto].
8. CALM Golf in its proposal of October, 2008 did not identify any on site superintendent
whatsoever. [page 68 of Exhibit “A” hereto]. Accordingly, CALM Golf could not
possibly have been rated as anything higher than Not Advantageous in the area of
Maintenance Equipment/Staff.
9. It is axiomatic that CALM Golf’s proposal in the category of Financial Information could
not possibly have been considered as Highly Advantageous since it did not provide the
required audited financial statements. Additionally, CALM Golf only provided two years
worth of financial statements together with one corporate tax return showing zero
income.
10. In its proposal CALM Golf identified only two “contracts” awarded to CALM Golf
throughout its six years in existence. One was a four month contract at Strawberry Valley,
Abington in 2003 and the other was a contract in 2008 having to do with the Pro Shop at
the Rockland Golf Course, which is essentially a contract between Charles Lanzetta and
11. The financial statements submitted by CALM Golf in its proposal show that CALM Golf
has not had any income in the years 2005, 2006 and 2007. These were the only years for
3
which CALM Golf provided financial data. [pages 78-90 of Exhibit “A” hereto]
12. The financial statements submitted by CALM Golf in its proposal show that CALM Golf
had total assets of $4,411.92 in 2005, total assets of $1,336.92 in 2006 and total assets of
13. The financial statements submitted by CALM Golf are not audited and thus the proposal
of CALM Golf could never have achieved the rating of “Highly Advantageous” in the
14. CALM Golf is not operating any golf course presently and with the exception of a four
month period in 2003, CALM Golf has never operated and maintained any golf course.
15. The financial information provided by CALM Golf in its proposal demonstrate that
CALM Golf had no income for the past three years and minimal assets of $169.00 as of
16. The Non-Price Proposal of Eagles Nest Tree & Landscape should never have been
considered since the proposal (Exhibit “C”) was not signed, nor did it include the Non-
Collusion Certificate which the RFP required (page 9 of the RFP). In addition, Eagles
Nest Tree and Landscape failed to include audited financials; failed to show any occasion
in which it managed and maintained any two golf courses simultaneously for a three year
period; failed to show that it had pesticide insurance and failed to show that it was
17. The Non-Price Proposal of Robert Gunnerson (Exhibit “B”) clearly demonstrates that
2
In fact the Accountant at page 78 of Exhibit “A” specifically states that “I have not
audited or reviewed the accompanying financial statements.”
4
Mr. Gunnerson is not currently in business and is not managing any golf course or
comparable business. Furthermore, the Gunnerson Proposal did not include audited
financials; did not show that Gunnerson ever operated and maintained more than one golf
course for a period of three years; did not include pesticide insurance; did not include
required equipment list; and did not provide balance sheets or income statements as
18. The Non-Price Proposal of Daley & Stiles (Exhibit “D”) did not include the Non-
Collusion Certificate which the RFP required (page 9 of the RFP). In addition, Daley &
Stiles failed to include audited financials; failed to show any occasion in which it
managed and maintained any two golf courses simultaneously for a three year period;
failed to show that it had pesticide insurance and failed to show that it was currently
operating even one golf course. It was rated Unacceptable in every category by Mr.
Floreano and it was given an overall rating of “Not Qualified” by Mr. Floreano. It was
rated “Not Advantageous” overall by Mr. Cushing. It was rated “Not Advantageous” in
two categories by Mr. Dixon and rated “Advantageous” by Mr. Dixon in Maintenance
19. The Daley/Stiles Proposal also failed to list any superintendent or Golf Professional. No
one named in the proposal had any experience in the golf management field whatsoever.
Signed under the pains and penalties of perjury this 28th day of January, 2009.
_______________________
Stephen R. Follansbee
5
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Stephen R. Follansbee, hereby certify that a true copy of the Supplemental Affidavit of
Stephen R. Follansbee dated January 28, 2009 was served upon Robert Troy, Esq by first class
mail to Robert Troy, Esq., 90 Old Kings Highway, Sandwich, MA 02563 and David Edge, Esq.,
Geary And Associates, 161 Summer Street, Kingston, MA 02364
Signed under the pains and penalties of perjury this 29th day of January 2009.
_______________________