Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MOTORTECHNISCHE ZEITSCHRIFT
MTZ Motortechnische Zeitschrift 62 (2001) Vol. 7/8 & 12 Friedr. Vieweg & Sohn Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, Wiesbaden
DEVELOPMENT
Part 1
Introduction
considerable danger during their operation. Therefore, continuous safety monitoring of the operating conditions is required in order to avoid both primary and
secondary damage. The operational danger of large diesel engines can lead to the
development of serious fires or to sec-
3
Oil Mist as a Dangerous
Element during the Operation of
Large Diesel Engines
3.1 History
3.1.1
In 1947, the occurrence of a dramatic
crankcase explosion in a ship [1] led British
institutes to conduct scientific investigations into the phenomenon. The findings,
published in the mid 1950's [2, 3, 4], still
represent the most important scientific
study of the operational hazard involving
crankcase explosion, especially in large
diesel engines.
The international safety regulatory body,
the International Maritime Organisation
(IMO), with 156 member states, is an suborganisation of the UN and has its headquarters in London. It was established in
1982 by the Inter-Governmental Maritime
Consultative Organisation (IMCO), which
assumed its duties in 1948.
Through the IMO, the SOLAS (Safety of Life
at Sea) Regulations were launched with
reference to fire precautions. Chapter II-1
Construction Part E Additional requirements for periodically unattended machinery spaces, Regulation 47 correlates
to the fire hazard developing from
crankcase explosions.
3.1.2
The intention of these regulations, which
were introduced in the 1960's, was to improve the safety of marine engines and require monitoring by means of oil mist detection as a means of avoiding crankcase
explosions. The regulation refers in particular to all internal combustion engines
with an output of more than 2.25 MW or
those with a cylinder greater than 300
mm. Further protective measures mentioned in the relevant SOLAS regulations
for the prevention of crankcase explosions
are not clearly defined (for example: engine bearing temperature monitors or
equivalent devices), and a superficial,
merely cost-oriented interpretation is not
a safe means of preventing fire caused by
crankcase explosion.
The supervision and implementation of
the SOLAS regulations is largely the responsibility of national classification societies. Of these, the major ones formed an
association in 1969 called IACS (International Association of Classification Societies). IMO and IACS (as an intermediary),
Figure 2, compile and control the international regulations for ship safety in a defined cooperation [5].
3.1.13
In recent years, as a consequence of dramatic shipping catastrophes involving sig-
DEVELOPMENT
nificant and costly environmental damage as well as the loss of material and
unprecedented loss of human life,
more effective safety regulations were
agreed upon on an international level,
with the intention of avoiding further
catastrophes.
Figure 2: Intermediary
model of the classification societies [5]
3.1.4
These include two agreements in particular:
The Marpol Agreement (PSC = Port
States Control, Internet: Equasis.org), in
which the port member states are
obliged to inspect the docking ships
and verify that they comply with the
valid safety regulations. If deficiencies
are discovered, the ships are to be prevented from embarking until they comply with the safety regulations
The ISM Code (International Safety Management Code), which has the primary
objective of maintaining safe shipping
operation and the prevention of marine
pollution by ensuring that operators of
ships fulfil the obligations and responsibilities determined by the Code.
The Code establishes safety management
objectives and requires a safety management system (SMS) to be established by
the Company, which is defined as the
ship owner or any person, such as the
manager or chartering agent, who has assumed responsibility for operating the
ship. The Company is then required to establish and implement a policy for
achieving these objectives. This includes
providing the necessary resources and
shore-based support. Every company is
expected to designate a person or persons ashore having direct access to the
highest level of management. The procedures required by the Code must be documented and compiled in a Safety Management Manual, a copy of which is to be
kept on board.
4
Technical Measures for
Ensufing Safe Ship Operation
Apart from measures that guarantee the
stability of the ship's hull, all equipment
that is necessary for the safe operation of
the ship must be fully functional.
4.1
The ship can only manoeuvre if the ship's
propulsion system and the rudder system
are in working order. For the majority of
4.2
The classification societies are currently
establishing rules for redundant diesel engine power units, especially to secure the
function of the ship's propulsion system
and the function of the rudder.
5
Oil Mist as a Damage
Indicator
Oil mist is a dangerous element but, if
recognised early, it can also serve as a
suitable indicator that measures are required to prevent the marine diesel engine from suffering damage.
protection is that of the right system configuration for efficient engine safety
equipment based on oil mist detection
(OMD). As yet, the classification societies
(Section 4) have not established the rules
within the framework of IACS,.
Due to the pressure of cost reduction in the
supply industry for ships and marine
equipment, the lack of unequivocal regulations leads to inadequate solutions for
safety related to oil mist detection. It is
clear that, during normal trouble-free operation, safety equipment is irrelevant and
only becomes necessary at the moment
when the emergency occurs.
In addition, a number of other non-lubrication-related anomalies in the diesel engine can be recognized, for example when
the cooling of pistons is failing and the
temperature increase causes an exceptional oil mist generation that is ultimately detected.
6
OMDEA, Oil Mist Detection
Efficiency Approval
Following a meeting attended by representatives from classification societies,
OMD manufacturers and scientists,
Schaller Automation established the project OMDEA with the aim of developing
improved fundamentals for controlled engine safety. Within the framework of
stringent safety regulations for ships, engines are also required to have certification known as the Type Approval Certification (TAC). Included in the TAC are tests
for safety equipment, such as measures
against crankcase explosions.
Figure 3: Oil mist detector installed on a crosshead two-stroke engine. Power output 9 MW
(output up to 70 MW per unit can be realized)
Figure 4: Oil mist detector installed on a four-stroke diesel engine, 2,4 MW, up to 50 MW per unit can be
realized
DEVELOPMENT
Figure 5: Classic oil mist detector provided with siphon block suction system for each crankcase compartment
The findings of the research will be presented in Part 2 of this article. The results
of test series conducted by the company
FMC, Fiedler Motoren Consulting Kiel
GmbH, Germany, will also be published in
Part 2.
Concluding Remarks
DEVELOPMENT
Operational Danger
of Large Marine
Diesel Engines
(above 2.25 MW)
Part 2
Part 1 [7] of this article by Schaller Automation pointed out that there are internationally controlled safety regulations on this subject. However, these regulations
are not specific and their implementation is difficult, since there is a lack of precise technical and verifiable definitions. Part 2 describes the efforts of Schaller
Automation to make the fundamental safety measures achievable in a practicable
manner and to allow the efficiency of these measures to be confirmed without
the need for such compromising concessions as where practicable [8]. In order
to create the basis for achieving this aim, tests and extensive measurements
were performed at the Institute for Machine Design and Vehicle Construction of
the University of Karlsruhe (TH). The findings of this research show that a definite
improvement in engine protection measures is possible, and positive results can
be achieved by the controlled application of these measures.
DEVELOPMENT
9 Introduction
10.1.1Protection Category 1
Damage localization based on Protection Category 2. This enables the quick location of the
affected compartment and recognition of the
damage. Damage that has not been located
successfully can result in the affected engine
10.2.1 Criterion 1:
Sensors and Evaluation
9 Introduction
oping. This criterion is even more important for the acceptance of an OMD system
than Criterion 1.
10.2.3 Criterion 3:
Availability of the protection
system
System Safety Level 1: The system controls itself and a special alarm signal is
activated when the protection function for
ascertaining oil mist is malfunctioning
(low-cost version)
System Safety Level 2: In addition to
DEVELOPMENT
The formation of the oil mist was demonstrated using half plain bearing shells
and complete plain bearing shells. The
test bench was driven at a speed of 3000
rpm in order to simulate the performance
of large diesel engines as far as possible.
The sliding speed is then of the same
order as that found in actual large
engines. The diagram in Figure 11 shows
the measurement results of a test with a
statically loaded bronze half shell. The
start of the seizure is clearly concluded
from the rapid rise at 65 s of the measurement time. The bearing temperature
increased within a short time from 63 C
to almost 300 C. The oil mist formation
could be observed from a bearing temperature of 200 C onwards. The opacity
therefore increased from approximately 2
% to 75 %.
The oil mist formation began almost 7
seconds after the beginning of the bearing seizure. BEAROMOS, on the other
hand, showed a signal increase even
before the torque increase, which indicated the developing bearing damage. As
the seizure began, the BEAROMOS signal
once again increased notably. During the
10
11
DEVELOPMENT
12
A controllable oil mist generator is essential for the production of the type of oil
mist found in the case of damage. It is a
prerequisite that the oil mist achieves a
specific opacity as formed during real
damage, depending on the engine
crankcase size, expansion rate and washout effect caused by intensive lubricating
oil splashing. In order to achieve this, a
physical effect is applied, Title Figure.
Lubricating oil under pressure is heated
up and, as a result of the heat content
(enthalpy), it vaporizes as it expands
under atmospheric pressure. In this way,
the equivalent oil mist for the simulation
of Standard Damage can be generated.
11.4.2 Experiments on Oil Mist
Simulation in Crankcases
higher thermal loads in modern fourstroke engines also influence the washout effect of oil mist (curves B1 to B3),
resulting from higher splash-oil quantities discharged from the piston cooling
outlet. The wash-out effect caused by the
intense amount of oil spray is also the
reason why it takes longer to obtain measurable values of oil mist opacity in the
compartments located further away from
the one in which damage is being simulated. The curves A1 to A3 show the early
phase of induction per time unit, containing relatively low amounts of oil mist. It
can be seen that both the engine speed
and the load have a clear influence on the
dispersion of oil mist along the different
compartments.
Curves B1 to B3 clearly display the
wash-out effect caused by the oil spray,
and the dissipation of oil mist moving in
the compartments in the direction of the
crankcase ventilation. The simulation
experiments performed on the highspeed engine show analogous results.
However, the characteristic values
deduced from the B curves point to a
slightly higher dissipation factor. It can
be clearly deduced from both engine categories that efficient engine protection in
the sense of OMDEA is worthwhile and
possible to achieve.
12 Summary
13
DEVELOPMENT
14
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
The authors
Dipl.-Ing. Werner Schaller
Senior Chief and Managing Director
SCHALLER AUTOMATION
Industrielle Automationstechnik KG
Blieskastel / Saarland /
Germany
Dipl.-Ing. Manfred Drr
Principal Responsible for
Project OMDEA at
SCHALLER AUTOMATION
Acknowledgement
The authors would like to
thank Prof. Klaus Groth for
his excellent advice and
support.
15
DIEMOS
DIESEL ENGINE
Help usSie
to mit,
make
theDieselbetrieb
diesel operation
Helfen
den
auf safer.
Manifest sicherer
your opinion
by conveying
Schiffen
zu machen.
Sagen your
Sie Ihre
Meinung
und bringen Sie Ihre Erfahrung ein!
experience!
Unter
Underder
theWebadresse
web page
www.dieselsafety.org
WWW.dieselsecurity.org
untersttzt SCHALLER eine non-profitSCHALLER AUTOMATION supports a nonWebsite, die als hersteller-unabhngiges
profit website serving as a manufacturers
Forum hierfr dient.
independent forum.
www.schaller.de
Ausfhrliche Informationen
finden Sie
auch auf unserer Homepage:
Or
request our CD ROM under:
www.schaller.de
info@schaller.de
info@schaller.de
.
.
D - 66432 Blieskastel
Saarland
Germany
Tel. + 49 (0) 6842 / 508 - 0 Fax + 49 (0) 6842 / 508 - 260