Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Engineers Beginners
Pos ted J UN 19 201 3 by BI PU L RAM A N in A UT OM AT IO N , SC ADA wi th 29 C OMM EN TS
An Introduction To SCADA (Supervisory Control And Data Acquisition) For Beginners // On photo Monitor iFIX By
ServiTecno via FlickR
A SCADA system usually refers to a system that coordinates, but does not control processes
in real time, but DCS do that. SCADA systems often have Distributed Control System (DCS)
components.
Components of SCADA
1. Human Machine Interface (HMI)
It is an interface which presents process data to a human operator, and through this, the human
operator monitors and controls the process.
5. Communication infrastructure
It provides connectivity to the supervisory system to the Remote Terminal Units.
but the SCADA system may allow operators to change the set points for the flow, and enable alarm
conditions, such as loss of flow and high temperature, to be displayed and recorded.
The feedback control loop passes through the RTU or PLC, while the SCADA system monitors the
overall performance of the loop.
Institute 'Mihailo Pupin' - Third generation of Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) Systems and Digital Control Systems
(DCS) - On photo Distribution System of Elektrovojvodina, Serbia
Generations
SCADA systems have evolved in parallel with the growth and sophistication of modern computing
technology.
The following sections will provide a description of the following three generations of SCADA
systems:
1.
2.
3.
When SCADA systems were first developed, the concept of computing in general centered
onmainframe systems. Networks were generally non-existent, and each centralized system
stood alone.
As a result, SCADA systems were standalone systems with virtually no connectivity to other
systems.
The Wide Area Networks (WANs) that were implemented to communicate with remote terminal
units (RTUs) were designed with a single purpose in mindthat of communicating with RTUs in
the field and nothing else. In addition, WAN protocols in use today were largely unknown at the
time.
The communication protocols in use on SCADA networks were developed by vendors of RTU
equipment and were often proprietary.
In addition, these protocols were generally very lean, supporting virtually no functionality
beyond that required scanning and controlling points within the remote device. Also, it was
generally not feasible to intermingle other types of data traffic with RTU communications on the
network.
Connectivity to the SCADA master station itself was very limited by the system
vendor. Connections to the master typically were done at the bus level via a proprietary adapter
or controller plugged into the Central Processing Unit (CPU) backplane.
Redundancy in these first generation systems was accomplished by the use of
two identically equipped mainframe systems, a primary and a backup, connected at the
bus level.
The standby systems primary function was to monitor the primary and take over in the event of a
detected failure. This type of standby operation meant that little or no processing was done on the
standby system. Figure 1 shows a typical first generation SCADA architecture.
Go to Content
Multiple stations, each with a specific function, were connected to a LAN and shared information
with each other in real-time.
These stations were typically of the mini-computer class, smaller and less expensive than their
first generation processors.
Some of these distributed stations served as communications processors, primarily communicating
with field devices such as RTUs. Some served as operator interfaces, providing the humanmachine interface (HMI) for system operators. Still others served as calculation processors or
database servers.
The distribution of individual SCADA system functions across multiple systems provided more
processing power for the system as a whole than would have been available in a single
processor. The networks that connected these individual systems were generally based on LAN
protocols and were not capable of reaching beyond the limits of the local environment.
Some of the LAN protocols that were used were of a proprietary nature, where the vendor created
its own network protocolor version thereof rather than pulling an existing one of the shelf. This
allowed a vendor to optimize its LAN protocol for real-time traffic, but it limited (or effectively
eliminated) the connection of network from other vendors to the SCADA LAN.
Figure 2 depicts typical second generation SCADA architecture.
Distribution of system functionality across network-connected systems served not only to increase
processing power, but also to improve the redundancy and reliability of the system as a
whole. Rather than the simple primary/standby fail over scheme that was utilized in many first
generation systems, the distributed architecture often kept all stations on the LAN in an online
state all of the time.
For example, if an HMI station were to fail, another HMI station could be used to operate the
system, without waiting for fail over from the primary system to the secondary.
The WAN used to communicate with devices in the field were largely unchanged by
the development of LAN connectivity between local stations at the SCADA master. These external
communications networks were still limited to RTU protocols and were not available for other types
of network traffic.
As was the case with the first generation of systems, the second generation of SCADA systems
was also limited to hardware, software, and peripheral devices that were provided or at least
selected by the vendor.
Go to Content
Another advantage brought about by the distribution of SCADA functionality over a WAN is that
of disaster survivability. The distribution of SCADA processing across a LAN in secondgeneration systems improves reliability, but in the event of a total loss of the facility housing the
SCADA master, the entire system could be lost as well.
By distributing the processing across physically separate locations, it becomes possible to build a
SCADA system that can survive a total loss of any one location.
For some organizations that see SCADA as a super-critical function, this is a real benefit.
SCADA The Heart Of Distribution Management System (DMS) - On photo: Fima UAB - Dedicated control systems and
SCADA (Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition) as well as DMS (Distribution Management System) type of systems
are offered for electricity, water and gas supply companies, as well as telecommunication operators and manufacturing
companies.
Distribution SCADA
As was stated in the title, the Supervisory Control And Data Acquisition (SCADA) system is the
heart of Distribution Management System (DMS) architecture.
A SCADA system should have all of the infrastructure elements to support the multifaceted nature
of distribution automation and the higher level applications of a DMS. A Distribution SCADA
systems primary function is in support of distribution operations telemetry, alarming, event
recording, and remote control of field equipment.
Historically, SCADA systems have been notorious for their lack of support for the import, and
more importantly, the export of power system data values.
A modern SCADA system should support the engineering budgeting and planning functions by
providing access to power system data without having to have possession of an operational
workstation.
The main elements of a SCADA system are:
1.
2.
3.
Host equipment
Communication infrastructure (network and serial communications)
Field devices (in sufficient quantity to support operations and telemetry requirements of a
DMS platform)
Host Equipment
The essential elements of a distribution SCADA host are:
1.
2.
3.
4.
The elements and components of the typical distribution automation system are illustrated
inFigure 1 above.
1.
2.
3.
A network/CPU board,
Serial cards, and
Possibly a time code receiver.
Functionality should include the ability to download configuration and scan tables. The CFE should
also support the ability to dead band values (i.e., report only those analog values that have
changed by a user-defined amount).
CFE, network, and SCADA servers should be capable of supporting worst-case
conditions (i.e., all points changing outside of the dead band limits), which typically occur during
severe system disturbances.
Full graphic displays provide the ability to display power system data along with the electric
distribution facilities in a geographical (or semigeographical) perspective.
The advantage of using a full graphics interface becomes evident (particularly for distribution
utilities) as SCADA is deployed beyond the substation fence where feeder diagrams become
critical to distribution operations.
communicate with many remote sites. Protocol and bandwidth limit the number of remote terminal
units that can be communicated with by a master radio. The protocol limit is simply the address
range supported by the protocol.
Bandwidth limitations can be ofset by the use of efficient protocols, or slowing down the scan
rate to include more remote units. Spread-spectrum and point-to-point radio (in combination with
MAS) ofers an opportunity to address specific communication problems.
At the present time MAS radio is preferred to packet radio (another new radio technology); MAS
radio communications tend to be more deterministic providing for smaller timeout values on
communication noresponses and controls.
Field Devices
Distribution Automation (DA) field devices are multi-featured installations meeting a broad
range of control, operations, planning, and system performance issues for the utility personnel.
Each device provides specific functionality, supports system operations, includes fault detection,
captures planning data and records power quality information. These devices are found in the
distribution substation and at selected locations along the distribution line. The multi-featured
capability of the DA device increases its ability to be integrated into the electric distribution system.
The functionality and operations capabilities complement each other with regard to the control
and operation of the electric distribution system.
The fault detection feature is the eyes and ears for the operating personnel. The fault detection
capability becomes increasingly more useful with the penetration of DA devices on the distribution
line.
The real-time data collected by the SCADA system is provided to the planning engineers for
inclusion in the radial distribution line studies. As the distribution system continues to grow, the
utility makes annual investments to improve the electric distribution system to maintain adequate
facilities to meet the increasing load requirements.
The use of the real-time data permits the planning engineers to optimize the annual capital
expenditures required to meet the growing needs of the electric distribution system.
The power quality information includes capturing harmonic content to the 15th harmonic and
recording Percent Total Harmonic Distortion (%THD). This information is used to monitor the
performance of the distribution electric system.
Modern RTU
Todays modern RTU is modular in construction with advanced capabilities to support functions
that heretofore were not included in the RTU design.
The modular design supports installation configurations ranging from the small point count
required for the distribution line pole-mounted units to the very large point count required for large
bulk-power substations and power plant switchyard installations.
The modern RTU modules include analog units with 9 points, control units with 4 control pair
points, status units with 16 points, and communication units with power supply.
The RTU installation requirements are met by accumulating the necessary number of modern RTU
modules to support the analog, control, status, and communication requirements for the site to be
automated. Packaging of the minimum point count RTUs is available for the distribution line
requirement.
The substation automation requirement has the option of installing the traditional RTU in one
cabinet with connections to the substation devices or distributing the RTU modules at the devices
within the substation with fiberoptic communications between the modules.
The distributed RTU modules are connected to a data concentrating unit which in turn
communicates with the host SCADA computer system.
The modern RTU accepts direct AC inputs from a variety of measurement devices including linepost sensors, current transformers, potential transformers, station service transformers, and
transducers. Direct AC inputs with the processing capability in the modern RTU supports fault
current detection and harmonic content measurements. The modern RTU has the capability to
report the magnitude, direction, and duration of fault current with time tagging of the fault event to
1-millisecond resolution. Monitoring and reporting of harmonic content in the distribution electric
circuit are capabilities that are included in the modern RTU.
The digital signal processing capability of the modern RTU supports the necessary
calculations to report %THD for each voltage and current measurement at the automated
distribution line or substation site.
The modern RTU includes logic capability to support the creation of algorithms to meet specific
operating needs.
Automatic transfer schemes have been built using automated switches and modern RTUs with
the logic capability. This capability provides another option to the distribution line engineer when
developing the method of service and addressing critical load concerns.
The logic capability in the modern RTU has been used to create the algorithm to control
distribution line switched capacitors for operation on a per phase basis. The capacitors are
switched on at zero voltage crossing and switched of at zero current crossing.
The algorithm can be designed to switch the capacitors for various system parameters, such as
voltage, reactive load, time, etc. The remote control capability of the modern RTU then allows the
system operator to take control of the capacitors to meet system reactive load needs.
The modern RTU has become a dynamic device with increased capabilities. The new logic and
input capabilities are being exploited to expand the uses and applications of the modern RTU.
While there is some overlap in capability with the modern RTU, the authors are familiar with the
use of PLCs for automatic isolation of the faulted power transformer in a two-bank substation and
automatic transfer of load to the unfaulted power transformer to maintain an increased degree of
reliability.
The PLC communicates with the modern RTU in the substation to facilitate the remote
operation of the substation facility.
The typical PLC can support serial communications to a SCADA server. The modern RTU has the
capability to communicate via an RS-232 interface with the PLC.
IEDs include electronic meters, electronic relays, and controls on specific substation
equipment, such as breakers, regulators, LTC on power transformers, etc.
The IEDs also have the capability to support serial communications to a SCADA server.
However, the authors experience indicates that the IEDs are typically reporting to the modern RTU
via an RS-232 interface or via status output contact points.
As its communicating capability improves and achieves equal status with the functionality
capability, the IED has the potential to become an equal player in the automation communication
environment.
However, in the opinion of the authors, the limited processing capability for supporting the
communication requirement, in addition to its functional requirements (i.e., relays, meters, etc.),
hampers the widespread use of the IEDs in the distribution automation system.
Resource: Power System Operation and Control - George L. Clark and Simon W. Bowen