Professional Documents
Culture Documents
960
theannals.com
Medications
Duration
(days)
Eradication
Rates
10-14
70-85%
10-14
75-90%
First 5 days:
proton pump inhibitor
amoxicillin 1000 mg po bid
Last 5 days:
proton pump inhibitor
clarithromycin 500 mg bid
tinidazole 500 mg bid
10
>90%
Standard doses for proton pump inhibitors are as follows: esomeprazole 40 mg/day po, lansoprazole 30 mg po bid, omeprazole 20 mg po bid, pantoprazole 40 mg po bid, rabeprazole 20 mg po bid.
theannals.com
961
962
UBT
Lansoprazole 30 mg bid,
clarithromycin 500 mg bid,
amoxicillin 1 g bid days
1-7
Rabeprazole 20 mg bid,
clarithromycin 500 mg bid,
amoxicillin 1 g bid days
1-7
Rabeprazole 20 mg bid,
clarithromycin 500 mg
bid, tinidazole 500 mg bid
days 1-7
Rabeprazole 20 mg bid,
clarithromycin 500 mg bid,
tinidazole 500 mg bid
days 1-7
Regimen
Lactobacillus GG,
Propionibacterium
freudenreichii ssp.
shermanii, L. rhamnosus,
Bifidobacterium breve
1 109 cfu/mL bid for 7
days, then daily for 21
days (milk-based fruit
drink; Valio Ltd., Helsinki,
Finland)
Group 1:
Lactobacillus GG bid
(Giflorex, Errekappa
Euroterapici S.p.A,
Milan, Italy)
Group 2:
Sacchromyces boulardii
bid (Codex, Smith Kline
Beecham, Milan, Italy)
Group 3:
Lactobacillus acidophilus
and Bifidobacterium
lactis bid (Ferzym,
Specchiasol, Milan, Italy)
Group 4: placebo bid
All groups given treatment
on days 1-14
Lactobacillus GG 6 109
cfu/mL bid days 1-14
(Giflorex, Errekappa
Euroterapici S.p.A,
Milan, Italy)
Antibiotic
Regimen
N = 114
M/F: 55/59
Mean age:
treatment group
46 y,
placebo group
43 y
H. pylori positive,
asymptomatic
Nista
(2004)15
UBT
Serology; UBT
N = 97
M/F: 43/54
Mean age: not
provided
H. pylori positive,
healthy,
asymptomatic
Cremonini
(2002)13
UBT, serology
Probiotic
Methods
Myllyluoma N = 47
(2005)14
M/F: 18/29
Mean age: 55.6 y
H. pylori positive,
healthy,
asymptomatic
N = 60
M/F: 25/35
Mean age: 40 y
H. pylori positive,
healthy,
asymptomatic
Diagnostic
Patients
Armuzzi
(2001)12
Author
Measurement
Outcomes
Questionnaire;
tablet count;
UBT (at 4 wk);
serology (at 4 mo)
Questionnaire;
tablet count;
UBT (at 5-7 wk)
Questionnaire;
tablet count;
UBT (at 6 wk)
Tools
Results
(Probiotic vs Control)
Symptoms:
During treatmenttaste disturbance (Group 1 =
9.5%, Group 2 = 5%, Group 3 = 5%, Group 4 =
40%; RR 0.15, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.46); diarrhea
(Group 1 = 5%, Group 2 = 5%, Group 3 = 5%,
Group 4 = 30%; RR 0.16, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.56)
Following treatmentno significant difference
between groups
Adherence: not reported
Eradication: Group 1 = 76%, Group 2 = 81%,
Group 3 = 86%, Group 4 = 80% (p = NS)
Symptoms:
During treatmentnausea (10% vs 36.6%; RR
0.3, 95% CI 0.1 to 0.9); taste disturbance
(23.3% vs 50%; RR 0.5, 95% CI 0.2 to 0.9);
diarrhea (3.3% vs 26.6%; RR 0.1, 95% CI 0.1
to 0.9)
Following treatmentno significant difference
between groups
Adherence: 100%
Eradication: 83.3% vs 80% (p = NS)
Table 2. Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trials of Probiotics Plus Eradication Therapy for
Helicobacter pylori Infections12-15
SM Wilhelm et al.
theannals.com
ery of Lactobacillus and Propionibacterium to show adherence in the treatment group and probiotic abstinence in
the placebo group.14 The first and fourth trials analyzed
symptoms individually, and categorized them weekly.12,15
This provided specific information regarding adverse
events and effective timing of probiotics.
Even though these are well-designed trials, they do have
limitations. They used differing eradication regimens. Two
of the trials12,13 used a tinidazole-based regimen, which is
not considered first-line therapy in the US.3 All 4 trials
used a 7-day eradication regimen, which is shorter than the
recommended 10- to 14-day regimens3; this may have had
an effect on eradication rates and tolerability. Small sample
sizes further limited the studies. In addition, subjects completed questionnaires and symptom diaries to report adverse effects and treatment tolerability, which may have
skewed the results because of the subjective nature of adverse effect reporting, and the inevitable variability in patient response to adverse effects. While all 4 trials assessed
adherence, rates were not reported. This may be an issue
because of the high pill burden of H. pylori eradication
therapy with additional probiotic doses. One trial included
participants from a group of educated health-care
providers, which does not necessarily represent the population most affected by H. pylori disease.12 Adverse effects
might be tolerated differently in this population, and the diets of the participants may be more rich in fruits, vegetables, and dairy compared to subjects in other trials. None
of the studies controlled for subjects intake of dietary probiotics such as yogurt or other probiotic supplements. It is
unclear whether any geographic differences existed, since
the 3 trials that showed improvement in tolerability were
conducted in Italy,12,13,15 whereas the fourth trial was conducted in Finland.14 Finally, all trials used different probiotics.
Conflicting evidence exists regarding the efficacy of
probiotics for the reduction of adverse effects and increase
in tolerability of H. pylori eradication therapies. Some trials indicate that probiotics are effective for reducing adverse effects and increasing eradication rates of H. pylori
therapy.16,17 Other trials showed increased eradication rates,
with increases or no change in adverse effects.18,19 While
some trials report probiotics have no effect on adverse effects or eradication rates,20,21 others report that probiotics
reduce adverse effects without affecting eradication rates.22
Probiotics may have a role as adjunctive therapy for H.
pylori eradication. They have been shown to improve gastrointestinal adverse effects such as nausea, taste disturbance, diarrhea, and epigastric discomfort. By reducing the
adverse effects, patients may adhere to H. pylori eradication therapy, thereby increasing eradication rates. This is
supported by a study that showed the use of a yogurt probiotic preparation resulted in a higher completion rate than
eradication therapy alone.17 An increase in the eradication
963
SM Wilhelm et al.
References
1. Valle JD. Peptic ulcer disease and related disorders. In: Fauci AS, Braunwald E, Kasper DL, et al., eds. Harrisons principles of internal medicine.
17th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2008:1855-71.
Manufacturer
Probiotic
CFU
Cost
(US $)
Capsules
(n)
Align
1 109
27.99
28
Culturelle
Amerifit Brands
1 1010
24.99
30
Flora Q
Kenwood Therapeutics
Lactobacillus acidophilus
Bifidobacterium
Lactobacillus paracasei
Streptococcus hermophilus
Not stated
29.99
30
Floranex
Rising
L. acidophilus
Lactobacillus bulgaricus
2 106
11.99
50
Florastor
Biocodex
Saccharomyces boulardii
Not stated
46.99
11.99
50
10
Lactinex (refrigerated)
L. acidophilus
L. bulgaricus
1 108
13.99
12 (packets)
Bayer
L. acidophilus
Bifidobacterium bifidum
Bifidobacterium longum
1.5 109
15.99
30
Systenex
Ganeden Biotech
2 109
16.99
30
964
theannals.com
theannals.com
23.
24.
25.
26.
965
SM Wilhelm et al.
966
theannals.com