Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ewart Martijn
4/7/2015
Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 2
References ............................................................................................................................. 13
Page 1
Introduction
This topic will continue to be a challenge for HR executives in the future because Millennials are
not only entering the labor market in high volumes, they are also getting opportunities to climb
the corporate ladder at an accelerated pace as the demand for leadership increases. At least part
of the control systems in organizations resides in the organizational culture; and leaders are in a
unique position to drive organizational culture.
Page 2
In literature there are many definitions of organizational culture and these definitions have a
common idea best described by Smircich (1983). The idea of culture focuses attention on the
expressive, non-rational qualities of the experience of organization. It legitimates attention to the
subjective, interpretive aspects of organizational life. Corporate culture entails a set of taken-forgranted assumptions, shared beliefs, meanings, and values that form a kind of backdrop for
action. According to (Schein, 1992), organizational culture has a number of components:
the organizations relationship to its environment (that is, what business are we in, and
why);
the nature of reality and truth (how do we decide which interpretations of information
and events are correct, and how do we make decisions);
the nature of human nature (are people basically lazy or industrious, fixed or
malleable));
the nature of human activity (what are the right things to do, and what is the best
way to influence human action);
Taking (some of) these components into account, organizations define strategies, policies and
processes in order to induce action and obtain satisfying results. The processes of repeated
actions with shared meanings among individuals in an organization are a form of
institutionalization. Institutions are composed of cultural-cognitive, normative and regulative
elements that, together with associated activities and resources, provide stability and meaning to
social life (Scott, 2001).
Regulative systems are systems of rules, in which coercive mechanisms are active to effect
compliance to rules to obtain rewards or to avoid sanctions. Normative systems provide a moral
framework, in which individuals are expected to show certain patterns of behavior, based on
common values. In cultural-cognitive systems, this normative concept is further expanded
beyond the individuals way of thinking and acting; collective action is supported by a common
cognitive framework of shared symbols and beliefs. Professionals can use a mix of these
institutional elements to attract and influence followers. Rules and regulations can be used to
Page 3
Page 5
Echo Boomers, Nexus Generation, Net Generation, Millennials, Generation Me, GenMe,
Generation Y, Generation We, Global Generation, Generation Next. The wide variety of names
used to categorize the 88 million people born in the U.S.A. between the years 1977 to 1997, as
compared to the limited number of names used for other generations, is already an indication of
its distinctive, diverse, personalized and dynamic character. It is a generation that wants, desires,
expects and demands.
According to various sources in literature, Millennials express the following wants, desires,
expectations or demands in or from their work environment:
To be part of innovative and energetic organizations that will value their ideas and
encourage their creativity (Lowe, Levitt, & Wilson, 2008).
To be treated like partners by their organization, which may mean flattening the
hierarchical structure that forms the very foundation of most corporations (Lowe, Levitt,
& Wilson, 2008).
Freedom, flexibility and fun; to spend their time in meaningful and useful ways, no
matter where they are (Lowe, Levitt, & Wilson, 2008). To make new friends, learn new
skills, and connect to a larger purpose (Meister & Willyerd, 2010).
To understand know how their work fits into the company (Lowe, Levitt, & Wilson,
2008).
Active involvement in receiving information (i.e. text messaging and blogging) (Lowe,
Levitt, & Wilson, 2008). Coaching and straight feedback from their boss (Meister &
Willyerd, 2010).
These are expressions of values that are important to this generation; the same values that are
important in determining their behavior and attitude towards work in organizations. Twenge
(2010) empirically substantiated the generational differences in work values. In particular,
Millenials scored high on leisure values (the opportunity for free time, vacation, and freedom
Page 6
The above results shed light on why Millennials may be perceived as having an attitude of
entitlement, as they value both leisure and extrinsic rewards highly. The impact of the
importance of leisure at work helps explain the rise in employers approach to providing fun at
work, and the still-highly rated intrinsic value shows why Millennials want work itself to be
rewarding, which is more fun (Schullery, 2013).
Page 7
The Workplace Engagement 2020 model (Meister & Willyerd, 2010) presents an attractive
solution for the attraction and engagement of employees now and in the future, including
Millennials.
The model is based on five principles and three practice areas necessary to engage employees.
The five principles are:
1. Collaboration (both internal and external collaboration)
2. Authenticity (of primary importance in building the organizations values, brand and
reputation)
3. Personalization (personalized employee relationships, focused on personal career goals)
4. Innovation (enabling organizational and personal learning and sustainability)
5. Social connection (fun, vibrant and engaging environments, including use of social
media)
The five principles are the foundation for three key practice areas which are strong values, a
strong brand and reputation (Corporate Social Responsibility).
The model was developed based on analysis of the top ten desired employer characteristics by
the different generations. According to the presented results, Millennials share the same top 3
desires as the overall mix of all generations. The employer organization must:
1. have strong values (intrinsic)
2. develop employee skills for the future (intrinsic)
3. offer flexible benefits and rewards (extrinsic)
According to (Throckmorton & Gravett, 2007) , the top three ways to attract Millennials to an
organization are:
An attractive salary
Similarities with the triggers and principles of the Workplace Engagement 2020 model are
evident. Thompson (2012) argues that the key to Millennial commitment and retention is the
relationship with the immediate manager. Managers who can adopt a leadership style rooted in
the individual consideration domain of transformational leadershipone that promotes
relationships and meeting individual needs are the managers who will most successfully
attract, motivate, and retain their Millennial employees. Success is expected by Thompson,
because this style caters to the personalized and development-oriented attention Millennials
desire, by applying the management skills of coaching, mentoring, developing, and providing
frequent feedback to the young employees.
These models of attraction are consistent with the desires of Millennials presented in the
previous paragraph, but are not always consistent with the results of the extensive empirical
study presented by Twenge. One explanation is that many researchers employ survey methods
that do not take age differences into account. Twenge employed the time-lag method, which
compares people of the same age at different points in time. This method shows differences (if
any) that are caused by generation instead of age; and therefore informs managers how young
workers now differ from young workers in the past.
The relatively high scores for extrinsic rewards show correspondence with the importance given
to salary, benefits and rewards in the findings of (Meister & Willyerd, 2010) and (Thompson &
Gregory, 2012). The empirical evidence shows, however, that Millennials value leisure time
more than any other generation. Policies, such as compressed weeks (40 hours in 4 days),
flextime (working hours outside the 8-to-5 routine) or other creative policies to increase leisure
time should therefore be extended to include the younger generation (Twenge, Campbell,
Hoffman, & Lance, 2010).
Considering that intrinsic rewards (such as a meaningful job, a positive contribution to nature,
career growth, the opportunity to learn new skills and to make a difference), are valued slightly
less by Millennials, recruitment and retention strategies heavily focused towards these values
Page 9
The lower importance of social rewards for Millennials suggests that structuring work and
organizational culture around teams in an effort to recruit and retain younger workers may
not be fruitful (Twenge, Campbell, Hoffman, & Lance, 2010). Millennials build their social
networks through advanced communication technology and across borders; they give less
importance to the process of building social relationships at work. This implies that, while the
provisioning of internal social rewards may not be particularly effective for attracting
Millennials, the absence or restriction of external social rewards (freedom to electronically
connect, communicate and build social networks outside the organizations) may repel
Millennials.
Page 10
Corporate culture involves a set of taken-for-granted assumptions, shared beliefs, meanings, and
values that form a backdrop for action in the organization. It can be considered as a basis of
control that can be used to influence and guide its members to achieve organizational goals.
The youngest generation of workers, the Millennials, show a distinctive set of values and
expression of values. Values are important in determining behavior and attitude towards work in
organizations. Therefore HR executives and organization leaders need to consider the
Millennials work values when planning to attract and retain this generation of workers.
Empirical studies show that leisure values and extrinsic values are most important for
Millennials followed by intrinsic values. Altruistic and social values do not score higher for
Millennials as compared to previous generations. These studies show that HR attraction and
engagement models heavily focused on values of social connection, team work, friendship on the
workfloor and voluntary work, may not be as effective as expected. These cultural-cognitive
elements are typically looked for by Millennials outside the boundaries of organizations.
On the other hand, attraction and engagement strategies based on leisure and extrinsic values
such as opportunity for free time, flexible vacation, freedom from supervision, status,
recognition, advancement opportunities, excellent salary and financial benefits, have a better
chance of success. These values are intertwined with regulatory and normative elements and
therefore provide better opportunities for influence by managers.
Once arranged, however, the leisure and extrinsic values offered at a superficial level to attract
and engage the young and demanding employees, will gradually engrave new cultural elements
at deeper cognitive levels; building new forms of collective action supported by (new) shared
symbols and beliefs. It is therefore important that managers do not to lose focus on the intrinsic
values.
In order to create a strong culture on the long run, managers need to adopt a leadership style in
which a personal coach-student relationship is built with the young employees. Intrinsic values
Page 11
This paper has shown that organizational culture is important in the attraction and engagement of
Millennials in the workplace. Leisure, reward, coaching and development seem to be the key
ingredients in a culture that Millennials find attractive and hard to leave.
Page 12
References
April
2,
2015,
from
http://www.talentculture.com/:
http://www.talentculture.com/leadership/creating-company-culture-irresistible-tomillennials/
Lowe, D., Levitt, K., & Wilson, T. (2008). Solutions for Retaining Generation Y Employees in
the Workplace . Business Renaissance Quarterly, Vol. 3 Issue 3, p43-58.
Meister, J. C., & Willyerd, K. (2010). The 2020 Workplace: How Innovative Companies Attract,
Develop, and Keep Tomorrow's Employees Today. New York: HarperBusiness.
Meister, J., & Willyerd, K. (2010). Mentoring Millennials. Harvard Business Review, Vol. 88
Issue 5, p68-72.
Schein, E. (1992). Organizational Culture and Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Schullery, N. M. (2013). Workplace Engagement and Generational Differences in Values.
Business Communication Quarterly, Vol. 76 Issue 2, p252-265.
Scott, W. R. (2001). Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA.: Sage.
Scott, W. R., & Davis, G. F. (2007). Organizations and organizing: rational, natural and open
system perspectives. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Smircich, L. (1983). Concepts of Culture and Organizational Analysis. Administrative Science
Quarterly, Vol. 28 Issue 3, p339-358.
Thompson, C., & Gregory, J. B. (2012). Managing Millennials: A Framework for Improving
Attraction, Motivation, and Retention. Psychologist-Manager Journal, Vol. 15 Issue 4,
p237-246.
Throckmorton, R., & Gravett, L. (2007). Bridging the Generation Gap : How to Get Radio
Babies, Boomers, Gen Xers, and Gen Yers to Work Together and Achieve More. Franklin
Lakes, NJ: Career Press.
Twenge, J. M., Campbell, S. M., Hoffman, B. J., & Lance, C. E. (2010). Generational
Differences in Work Values: Leisure and Extrinsic Values Increasing, Social and
Intrinsic Values Decreasing. Journal of Management, Vol. 36 Issue 5, p1117-1142.
Page 13