Challenge To State of Maine' S Political or Contractual Jurisdiction (Legal Form)

1
DISTRICT COURT AND SUPERIOR COURT
2
3
UNIFIED CRIMINAL DOCKET IN FRANKLIN COUNTY

STATE OF MAINE
4
5
6
129 Main Street, Suite 1, Farmington, ME 04938
7
8
9
10
STATE OF MAINE
11
VS.
12
13
Carol Murphy
Accused Belligerent Litigants
14
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Executive and Judicial

Branches
Case # Docket No.FRACD-CR-2014-00950
Wrongly
15
16
17
I, Carol Murphy , do hereby certify that I have on this ______ day of May, 2015, by hand delivering a
copy to his office in the County of Franklin. Maine 124 Main Street, Farmington, ME 04938
18
19
Served Plaintiffs attorney Andrew S. Robinson prosecuting attorney and assistant prosecuting attorney
district attorney James Andrews STATE OF MAINE.
20
21
22
And I likewise certify that I have on this _____ day of May , 2015, SERVED The DISTRICT COURT
AND SUPERIOR COURT UNIFIED CRIMINAL DOCKET IN FRANKLIN COUNTY STATE OF
MAINE
23
A true and correct copy of the two documents indicated herein below,
24
on behalf of the above named Wrongly Accused.
25
All concerned will please take note that this is a SERVICE of Process
26
27
on this Court, causing this COURT, to be an Inactive and non- Participating Party to this Jurisdictional
Challenge to the Executive Branch of the Government of STATE OF MAINE
28
29
30
This Court did not lodge the underlying charges and this Court is required to maintain its NEUTRAL
Position with no authority to act in any manner of judicial activity unless and until STATE OF MAINE
meets its burden to prove its jurisdiction over these Wrongly Accused!
31
32
NOTICE
(In Lieu of Motion)
33
34
OF CHALLENGE TO STATE OF MAINES POLITICAL OR CONTRACTUAL JURISDICTION

OVER THIS WRONGLY ACCUSED
35
and
CHALLENGE TO STATE OF MAINE S POLITICAL OR CONTRACTUAL JURISDICTION
Page 1 of 86
36
DEMAND THAT STATE OF MAINE PRESENT PROOF OF ITS JURISDICTION
37
38
39
STATE OF MAINES INHERENT FAILURE TO PRESENT SUCH PROOF SHALL CONSTITUTE

ITS AVERMENT THAT ALL CHARGES AGAINST THIS WRONGLY ACCUSED WERE AND
ARE INVALID AB INITIO
40
41
EXHIBIT A
42
43
44
45
46
DISTRICT COURT AND SUPERIOR COURT

UNIFIED CRIMINAL DOCKET IN FRANKLIN COUNTY
STATE OF MAINE
47
VS.
48
49
Carol Murphy
Accused Belligerent Litigants
Executive and Judicial

Branches
Case # Docket No.FRACD-CR-2014-00950
Wrongly
50
51
52
53
54
EXHIBIT A
55
to NOTICE (In Lieu of Motion) OF CHALLENGE TO STATE OF MAINE S POLITICAL OR
56
CONTRACTUAL JURISDICTION OVER THIS WRONGLY ACCUSED and DEMAND THAT
57
STATE OF MAINE PRESENT PROOF OF ITS JURISDICTION STATE OF MAINES INHERENT
58
FAILURE TO PRESENT SUCH PROOF SHALL CONSTITUTE ITS AVERMENT THAT ALL
59
CHARGES AGAINST THIS WRONGLY ACCUSED WERE AND ARE INVALID AB INITIO
60
Introduction Let STATE OF MAINE and this Honorable Court be advised;
61
The presentation herein and references to the forty-five (45) appellate court cases pertaining to and
62
establishing proper protocols in regard to procedures once jurisdiction has been challenged are not
63
offered herein by this Wrongly Accused as any basis for his Challenge to the jurisdiction of STATE of
64
MAINE over this Wrongly Accused.
65
The purpose of such presentment is to guide STATE OF MAINE and this Honorable Court as to the
66
fact that once such jurisdictional Challenge is entered on the record, any and all previous jurisdiction,
67
of any and every imaginable style or basis is suspended by this Basic Fundamental Jurisdictional
68
Challenge 45 Case Citations re: JURISDICTION

Page 2 of 86
69
70
71
1. "A void judgment is one that has been procured by extrinsic or collateral fraud or entered by a court
that did not have jurisdiction over the subject matter or the parties." Rook v. Rook, 233 Va. 92, 95, 353
S.E.2d 756, 758 (1987)
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
2. A court may not render a judgment which transcends the limits of its authority, and a judgment is
void if it is beyond the powers granted to the court by the law of its organization, even where the court
has jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter. Thus, if a court is authorized by statute to
entertain jurisdiction in a particular case only, and undertakes to exercise the jurisdiction conferred in a
case to which the statute has no application, the judgment rendered is void. The lack of statutory
authority to make particular order or a judgment is akin to lack of subject matter jurisdiction and is
subject to collateral attack. 46 Am. Jur. 2d, Judgments 25, pp. 388-89.
79
80
81
3. A void judgment is to be distinguished from an erroneous one, in that the latter is subject only to
direct attack. A void judgment is one which, from its inception, was a complete nullity and without
legal effect. Lubben v. Selective Service System, 453 F.2d 645, 649 (1st Cir. 1972).
82
83
84
85
4. A judgment rendered by a court without personal jurisdiction over the defendant is void. It is a
nullity. [A judgment shown to be void for lack of personal service on the defendant is a nullity.]
Sramek v. Sramek, 17 Kan. App. 2d 573, 576-77, 840 P.2d 553 (1992), rev. denied 252 Kan. 1093
(1993).
86
87
5. "Where there are no depositions, admissions, or affidavits the court has no facts to rely on for a
summary determination. Trinsey v. Pagliaro, D.C. Pa. 1964, 229 F. Supp. 647.
88
6. "A court cannot confer jurisdiction where none existed and cannot make a void proceeding valid. It
89
is clear and well established law that a void order can be challenged in any court", OLD WAYNE
90
MUT. L. ASSOC. v. McDONOUGH, 204 U. S. 8, 27 S. Ct. 236 (1907).
91
7. "The law is well-settled that a void order or judgment is void even before reversal", VALLEY v.
92
NORTHERN FIRE & MARINE INS. CO., 254 u.s. 348, 41 S. Ct. 116 ( 1920 )
93
8. "Courts are constituted by authority and they cannot go beyond that power delegated to them. If
94
they act beyond that authority, and certainly in contravention of it, their judgments and orders are
95
regarded as nullities ; they are not voidable, but simply void, and this even prior to reversal."
96
WILLIAMSON v. BERRY, 8 HOW. 945, 540 12 L. Ed. 1170, 1189 ( 1850 ).
97
9. "Once jurisdiction is challenged, the court cannot proceed when it clearly appears that the court
98
lacks jurisdiction, the court has no authority to reach merits, but rather should dismiss the action." Melo
99
v. U.S. 505 F 2d 1026.
100
10. "There is no discretion to ignore lack of jurisdiction." Joyce v. U.S. 474 2D 215.
101
11. "The burden shifts to the court [or charging entity] to prove jurisdiction. " Rosemond v. Lambert,
102
469 F 2d 416.
103
12. "Court [or charging entity] must prove on the record, all jurisdiction facts related to the jurisdiction
Page 3 of 86
104
asserted." Latana v. Hopper, 102 F. 2d 188; Chicago v. New York 37 F Supp. 150.
105
13. "The law provides that once State and Federal Jurisdiction has been challenged, it must be proven
106
[by the charging entity]." 100 S. Ct. 2502 (1980).
107
14. "Jurisdiction can be challenged at any time." Basso v. Utah Power & Light Co. 495 F 2d 906, 910.
108
15. "Defense of lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter may be raised at any time, even on appeal."
109
Hill Top Developers v. Holiday Pines Service Corp. 478 So. 2d. 368 (Fla 2nd DCA 1985).
110
16. "Thus, where a judicial tribunal has no jurisdiction of the subject matter on which it assumes to act,
111
its proceedings are absolutely void in the fullest sense of the term." Dillon v. Dillon, 187 P 27.
112
17. "Once challenged, jurisdiction cannot be assumed, it must be proved to exist." Stuck v. Medical
113
Examiners 94 Ca 2d 751. 211 P2d 389. 18. "Jurisdiction, once challenged, cannot be assumed and must
114
be decided." Maine v Thiboutot 100 S. Ct. 250.
115
19. "The law requires proof of jurisdiction to appear on the record of the administrative agency and all
116
administrative proceedings." Hagans v Lavine 415 U. S. 533. 20. A judgment obtained without
117
jurisdiction over the defendant is void. Overby v. Overby , 457 S.W.2d 851 (Tenn. 1970). Volume
118
20: Corpus Juris Sec. 1785.
119
21. Challenge to court's jurisdiction is raised by motion to dismiss, Criterion Co. v. State, 458 So. 2d.
120
22 (Fla 1st DCA 1984.22. Since jurisdiction is fundamental, and it is jurisdiction alone that gives a
121
court power to hear, determine, and pronounce judgment on the issues before it, jurisdiction must be
122
continuing in the court throughout the proceedings [meaning at the time charges were lodged], Re.
123
Cavitt, 254 P.599
124
23. Since jurisdiction is fundamental to any valid judicial proceeding, the first question that must be
125
determined by a trial court in any case is that of jurisdiction [of he charging entity], Dillon v. Dillon,
126
187 P,27.
127
24. "A universal principle as old as the law is that a proceedings of a court [or the charging entity]
128
without jurisdiction are a nullity and its judgment therein without effect either on person or property."
129
Norwood v. Renfield, 34 C 329; Ex parte Giambonini, 49 P. 732. 25. "Jurisdiction is fundamental and a
130
judgment rendered by a court that does not have jurisdiction to hear [due to lack of jurisdiction of
131
charging entity] is void ab initio." In Re Application of Wyatt, 300 P. 132; Re Cavitt, 118 P2d 846.
Page 4 of 86
132
26. "A court has no jurisdiction to determine its own jurisdiction, for a basic issue in any case before a
133
tribunal is its power to act, and a court must have the authority to decide that question in the first
134
instance." Rescue Army v. Municipal Court of Los Angeles, 171 P2d 8; 331 US 549, 91 L. ed. 1666, 67
135
S.Ct. 1409.
136
27. "A departure by a court from those recognized and established requirements of law, however close
137
apparent adherence to mere form in method of procedure, which has the effect of depriving one of a
138
constitutional right, is an excess of jurisdiction." Wuest v. Wuest, 127 P2d 93 4, 937.
139
28. "Where a court failed to observe safeguards, it amounts to denial of due process of law, court is
140
deprived of juris." Merritt v. Hunter, C.A. Kansas 170 F2d 739.
141
29. "The fact that the petitioner was released on a promise to appear before a magistrate for an
142
arraignment, that fact is circumstance to be considered in determining whether in first instance there
143
was a probable cause for the arrest." Monroe v. Papa, DC, Ill. 1963, 221 F Supp 685.
144
30. A motion to set aside a judgment as void for lack of jurisdiction is not subject to the time
145
limitations of Rule 60(b). See Garcia v. Garcia, 712 P.2d 288 (Utah 1986).
146
31. A judgment is void, and therefore subject to relief under Rule 60(b)(4), only if the court that
147
rendered judgment lacked jurisdiction or in circumstances in which the court's action amounts to a
148
plain usurpation of power constituting a violation of due process. United States v. Boch Oldsmobile,
149
Inc., 909 F.2d 657, 661 (1st Cir. 1990)
150
32. Where Rule 60(b)(4) is properly invoked on the basis that the underlying judgment is void, "'relief
151
is not a discretionary matter; it is mandatory.'" Orner v. Shalala, 30 F.3d 1307, 1310 (10th Cir. 1994)
152
(quoting V.T.A., Inc. v. Airco, Inc., 597 F.2d 220, 224 n.8 (10th Cir. 1979)).
153
33. In order for a judgment to be void, there must be some jurisdictional defect in the court's authority
154
to enter the judgment, either because the court lacks personal jurisdiction or because it lacks
155
jurisdiction over the subject matter of the suit. Puphal v. Puphal, 105 Idaho 302, 306, 669 P.2d 191, 195
156
(1983); Dragotoiu, 133 Idaho at 647, 991 P.2d at 379.
157
34. A void judgment is one that has been procured by extrinsic or collateral fraud or entered by a court
158
that did not have jurisdiction over the subject matter or the parties. Rook v. Rook, 233 Va. 92, 95, 353
159
S.E.2d 756, 758 (1987)
160
35. "Though not specifically alleged, defendant's challenge to subject matter jurisdiction implicitly
Page 5 of 86
161
raised claim that default judgment against him was void and relief should be granted under FRCP Rule
162
60(b)(4)." Honneus v. Donovan, Page 6 of 993 F.R.D. 433, 436-37 (1982), aff'd, 691 F.2d 1 (1st Cir.
163
1982).
164
36. "A judgment is void if the court acted in a manner inconsistent with due process. A void judgment
165
is a nullity and may be vacated at any time." 261 Kan. at 862.
166
37. Although Rule 60(b)(4) is ostensibly subject to the "reasonable" time limit of Rule 60(b), at least
167
one court has held that no time limit applies to a motion under the Rule 60(b)(4) because a void
168
judgment can never acquire validity through laches. See Crosby v. Bradstreet Co., 312 F.2d 483 (2nd
169
Cir.) cert. denied, 373 U.S. 911, 83 S.Ct. 1300, 10 L.Ed.2d 412 (1963) where the court vacated a
170
judgment as void 30 years after entry. See also Marquette Corp. v. Priester, 234 F.Supp. 799
171
(E.D.S.C.1964) where the court expressly held that FRCP Rule 60(b)(4) carries no real time limit.
172
38. Jurisdiction is power to declare the law, and when it ceases to exist, the only function remaining to
173
the court is that of announcing the fact and dismissing the cause." Ex parte McCardle, 7 Wall. 506, 514
174
(1869). "On every writ of error or appeal, the first and fundamental question is that of jurisdiction, first,
175
of this court, and then of the court from which the record comes. This question the court is bound to ask
176
and answer for itself, even when not otherwise suggested, and without respect to the relation of the
177
parties to it." Great Southern Fire Proof Hotel Co. v. Jones, supra, at 453. The requirement that
178
jurisdiction be established as a threshold matter "spring[s] from the nature and limits of the judicial
179
power of the United States" and is "inflexible and without exception." Mansfield, C. & L. M. R. Co. v.
180
Swan, 111 U. S. 379, 382 (1884).Cited in Steel Co. v. Citizens for Better Environment, 523 US 83 -
181
Supreme Court 1998.
182
39. "Statements of counsel in brief or in argument are not sufficient for motion to dismiss or for
183
summary judgment," Trinsey v. Pagliaro, D. C. Pa. 1964, 229 F. Supp. 647.
184
40. "An attorney for the plaintiff cannot admit evidence into the court. He is either an attorney or a
185
witness". (Trinsey v. Pagliaro D. C. Pa. 1964, 229 F. Supp. 647).
186
41. Factual statements or documents appearing only in briefs shall not be deemed to be a part of the
187
record in the case, unless specifically permitted by the Court" - Oklahoma Court Rules and Procedure,
188
Federal local rule 7.1(h).
189
42, "Manifestly, [such statements] cannot be properly considered by us in the disposition of [a] case."
190
United States v. Lovasco (06/09/77) 431 U.S. 783, 97 S. Ct. 2044, 52 L. Ed. 2d 752,
Page 6 of 86
191
43. Under no possible view, however, of the findings we are considering can they be held to constitute
192
a compliance with the statute, since they merely embody conflicting statements of counsel concerning
193
the facts as they suppose them to be and their appreciation of the law which they deem applicable, there
194
being, therefore, no attempt whatever to state the ultimate facts by a consideration of which we would
195
be able to conclude whether or not the judgment was warranted." Gonzales v. Buist. (04/01/12) 224
196
U.S. 126, 56 L. Ed. 693, 32 S. Ct.
197
44, "No instruction was asked, but, as we have said, the judge told the jury that they were to regard
198
only the evidence admitted by him, not statements of counsel", Holt v. United States, (10/31/10) 218
199
U.S. 245, 54 L. Ed. 1021, 31 S. Ct. 2, "The prosecutor is not a witness; and he should not be permitted
200
to add to the record either by subtle or gross improprieties. Those who have experienced the full thrust
201
of the power of government when leveled against them know that the only protection the citizen has is
202
in the requirement for a fair trial." Donnelly v. Dechristoforo, 1974.SCT.41709 56; 416 U.S. 637
203
(1974) Mr. Justice Douglas, dissenting.
204
45. "Care has been taken, however, in summoning witnesses to testify, to call no man whose character
205
or whose word could be successfully impeached by any methods known to the law. And it is
206
remarkable, we submit, that in a case of this magnitude, with every means and resource at their
207
command, the complainants, after years of effort and search in near and in the most remote paths, and
208
in every collateral by-way, now rest the charges of conspiracy and of gullibility against these witnesses,
209
only upon the bare statements of counsel. The lives of all the witnesses are clean, their characters for
210
truth and veracity un-assailed, and the evidence of any attempt to influence the memory or the
211
impressions of any man called, cannot be successfully pointed out in this record." Telephone Cases.
212
Dolbear v. American Bell Telephone Company, Molecular Telephone Company v. American Bell
213
Telephone Company. American Bell Telephone Company v.. Molecular Telephone Company, Clay
214
Commercial Telephone Company v. American Bell Telephone Company, People's Telephone Company
215
v. American Bell Telephone Company, Overland Telephone Company v. American Bell Telephone
216
Company,. (PART TWO OF THREE) (03/19/88) 126 U.S. 1, 31 L. Ed. 863, 8 S. Ct. 778.
217
Proceeding at all times under Threat, Duress and Coercion
218
____________________________
219
Carol Murphy
220
c/o 248 Lane Road New Sharon, Maine
Dated: May ___, 2015
Page 7 of 86
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
Hi Group Special Member,
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
5. Here is my disclaimer that you must agree to before

using my IRS letters of my Notice and Demand:
1. Please read my disclaimer here as you are bound by it.

2. Please understand that there is no Paytri-Idiot content as
that crap is irrelevant and does not work and will cause the
letters to fail.
3. There is only ONE issue, the Thirteenth Amendment's
prohibition of involuntary servitude, When did you
volunteer? That is he ONE and ONLY single issue, they have
to prove it - NOT YOU!!! Keep the burden of proof on
THEM!!!
4. You may have to copy and paste these letters into your
word processor and adjust the format.
Please understand that I am very busy,
I am Eric Williams, The Radical In The Twilight Zone
6. By my acceptance of these three generic letters, I

thereby proclaim under penalty of perjury, under the laws of
he United States, that I am not an agent of the United States
government or any sub agency thereof, including (but not
limited to), the IRS, FBI, DHS, DEA or any other government
agency of any manner or description, for any purpose whatso-ever.
7. Additionally, I likewise agree and stipulate, that any
information provided to me by Eric Williams, is for
information purposes only, and do not constitute and are not
considered by me to be any manner or form of legal advice,
Page 8 of 86
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
no matter what might be written or how it might be

presented by Eric Williams.
8. That if I choose to use any of the information presented
by Eric Williams, I do so on my own responsibility, and not
on any responsibility of Eric Williams.
9. Additionally, Eric Williams has not charged me any fee for
this information, nor have I paid or offered to pay any fee or
any other manner of remuneration to Eric Williams.
I acknowledge that the information created by Eric
10. Williams is owned by him under common law copy right
and is not subject to any manner of editing or modification
what-so-ever, other than obvious editing of name, gender,
state, address, state abandoned property statute, number of
page reference, reference to date of mailing or other dates,
or reference to IRS publication as reasonably appropriate.
11. No Pay-Tri-Idiot text or word changes permitted other

278 than deletions of inapplicable information.
277
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
Instructions for editing Generic Notice and Demand:

1. You may edit the font and type size and first page format
to suit local style, but NOT to insert any manner of PaytriIdiocy
2. This N&D has been double spaced to conform to what
most courts want to see. Certain parts of the text are not
double spaced because that is common practice for case
cites and other similar items.
3. If you change the font or eliminate bold type, such
change will cause the paging to change so then you will
need to go through and check for the hash mark slashes ///
that you will see at the bottom of some pages. After font
Page 9 of 86
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
changes you may find hash marks /// up on the pages, if so,
then delete those hash marks ///.
4. The rule for formatting paragraphs is that there should
never be just one line of a paragraph at the bottom of a
page. If the font change or other formatting changes cause
one line of a paragraph at the bottom of a page, then push
that one line down to the next page and enter, probably, two
lines of hash mark slashes /// . Never put more than three
hash mark slashes on one line and never put more than
three lines of hash marks on one page.
5. If there is a centered heading at the bottom of a page
with one line or less of text under it, then push that centered
heading down to the next page and enter three lines of three
hash mark slashes at the bottom of the page it was pushed
down from.
6. Be sure all pages are numbered at the bottom center of
each page.
7. Be sure all intermediate text headings are centered.
8. Be sure to do a search and replace of the name of the
state and the name entered on the generic N&D, to replace
them with the name of your state and your name. Do NOT
enter the word the in front of the state name, STATE OF
ARKANSAS.
9. When you enter your name enter it the regular way, with
no Paytri-Idiot format, and with no punctuation after your
first or middle name. None of that has any validity.
10. In order to understand what the truth is about all this
Patrri-Idiocy you might need to read United States Supreme
Court cite 46 on Exhibit A.
11. Together with the lengthy explanation of the truth
about how the name is used by the state, as I have
Page 10 of 86
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
explained it in IRS letter #2, beginning at about paragraph

#25.
12. This explanation dove tails in with the United States

Supreme Court writing in the case cite in paragraph 46 of
Exhibit A, and the Federal Thirteenth Amendment.
13. None of the all caps name info of the Paytri-Idiots has
any validity what-so-ever! And neither does the entry of ZIP
codes on your mail or address, and neither are birth
certificates bundled and sold and when filed do not assign
ownership of the child to the state and the gold fringe on a
flag has no affect on your political status! And neither does
the fact that all associations of human beings, including PTA
meetings, are corporate. Corporate is a word that is
greatly misunderstood.
14. Every meeting of Tea Party groups is corporate.
Corporate simply describes the association of humans for
a common purpose. Some of these associations are for
profit corporations, but many are not. Every municipality in
this country is a corporate entity. That does not cause them
to be evil and does not mean they have a distribution of tax
payer money to some owner group! This is all stupid nonthink of Paytri-Idiots!!!
15. I am 81 years old. I have been in this Freedom
Movement since 1964. I do not have time to explain all the
underlying nonsense so prevalent among the Paytri-Idiot
clan. That has taken me years to sort out.
16. My IRS letters and N&D have never failed to rid those
who properly use them, of government interference in their
lives.
17. Too many Group Members have taken my work and
changed it, or gone to court after serving my N&D, or filed
Page 11 of 86
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
motions after serving my N&D, enabling the court to ignore

the N&D or dismiss it as a motion.
385
20. Also, read the instructions I entered above paragraph

29. There are two paragraphs 29. One addresses the issue
of returning of bail money, if appropriate. If you have not
posted bail then you need to delete that version of 29. If
you did post bail then you need to delete the short version of
29. In both cases you delete the instruction paragraph I put
there, and then check the subsequent pages for any format
adjustments that might have been affected by the deletions
relative to paragraph 29.
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
18. You need to carefully read paragraph 21 of my N&D and

edit it appropriately to properly refer to the police or other
entity as needed.
19. Check paragraph 9 for the word himself. If you are
not a him edit that as appropriate, likewise paragraph 29
for the word he.
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
What are the Hazards of Using Notice and Demand?

1. To immediately put your mind at ease, the way
we are using the N&D Utility, here, in this
Challenge to The Political Jurisdiction of State
Governments, and using the same basis in the
same Challenge to the Federal Government in
these Letters to the IRS Letters, there are no
hazards other than those addressed in the
explanatory documents I have provided, caused by
inappropriate Paytri-Idiot editing.
2.
The Foundation of my N&D and my IRS letters
is Natural Law, but NOT based on Paytri-Idiot
Page 12 of 86
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
Imaginations and wishful thinking. My Basis is the

Federal Thirteenth Amendment, powerfully supported
by the United State Supreme Courts writings in the
1795 Case Citation included in Exhibit A, as item #
46, set forth herein down on page 8 hereof.
3.
The reason I am addressing this issue is
because Notice and Demand, the words, have been
wrongly or erroneously used many times for different
purposes, by persons in the Paytri-Idiot community.
4.
To the best of my knowledge none of these
prior Paytri-Idiot applications of N&Ds have been
successful. Some have even caused those who used
them some very serious legal problems. These were
instances where the N&D was used to demand money
based on some ill-founded Paytri-Idiot nonsensical
scheme.
5.
The reason my application is so effective is
because it is so simple, it requires very little study to
learn, and it is all based on simple common sense,
backed up by the Federal Thirteenth Amendment and
at least 46 appellate court case citations, the most
significant being my newly discovered SCOTUS writing
in 1795, included as Case Citation #46 in my Exhibit
A to my Notice and Demand.
6.
Understanding how things work, not just legal
things, but everything, requires us humans to use
what we call words. These words are sounds we
have made up to refer to about every item and manner
of situation of interest to us. We put these words
together in strings called sentences.
7.
Many of the words we use have many different
Page 13 of 86
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
meanings depending on the other words they are

combined with; some words even have an opposite
meaning. Sometimes it is actually impossible to
determine what a certain word actually means in some
written applications.
8.
My best example of this is the word
sanction. Sanction can mean approval or
punishment, and oftentimes the meaning can only be
determined by the tone of voice, facial expression and
body language of the speaking person. How can it be
possible to determine the tone of voice, facial
expression or body language when those words are
written on paper?
///
///
9.
My point here is that the words, Notice and
Demand, and challenge to jurisdiction have been
wrongly used so often by those in the Freedom
Movement, with very negative results, that many
persons are immediately dissuaded from using my
N&D simply because it is designated as being a Notice
and Demand.
10.
The courts in this country are well schooled on
the false arguments offered by Sovereign Citizens,
Free Men on The Land, State Citizens, and those
coming into court and immediately arguing the issue of
who they are and their name being written in all
capital letters in the documents filed with the court by
the prosecutor. And the often used totally erroneous
argument that because there was no victim, there
could be no crime.
Page 14 of 86
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
11.
Not to overlook the unfounded silly argument
that because the governments are corporate they are
unconstitutional and that the dejure Organic
Constitution has been replaced (which it has NOT).
12.
All of these arguments and many more, are
totally, one-hundred percent frivolous! And do nothing
other than insuring that the defendant is going to be
convicted by a corrupt court that is in violation of the
Constitution, when in fact, those courts are following
the CONstitution.
13.
Those courts are adhering to Article One Section
Ten, which prohibits any laws from being made that
would impair the obligation of contracts, and the
courts are also properly applying the Federal
Fourteenth Amendment to those defendants the Courts
perceives and assume are citizens of the United States,
because they have volunteered themselves to be, not
because of their birth in the United States or because
of anything in the Fourteenth Amendment. Please pay
very careful attention to the wording of the Thirteenth
Amendment and the SCOTUS writing in the 1795 case
presented as item 46 in Exhibit A to my N&D.
14.
I could go on writing here for many pages
explaining how all the Paytri-Idiocy is fallacious and
counter productive, however I have more and better
things to do.
15.
As a response to my messages that I was pulling
my N&D and IRS letters from my open access Yahoo
Group, a message was posted on that Group by Bob
Hurt, one of the most egregious of the Paytri-Idiot
Leaders. In his rather lengthy post Bob, in advising
Page 15 of 86
513
514
me to mend my ways, included this:

If
you want to promote something [Eric], promote

this:
515
516
517
1.
MEMORIZE the Federal Rules of Evidence and

your states differences - this is the most important
thing to know about litigation.
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
16.
My comment, the most important thing to know
about litigation is how to avoid it while maintaining
your Freedom, which we easily accomplish by serving
my N&D and using my IRS letters; but back to Bob
Hurts well thought out gibberish:
Bob Hurt Continues:
2.
Memorize, or learn well, the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure, and the State counterpart.
530
531
532
3.
Study litigation practice - nature of the courts,

difference between common and statutory law and
regulations, how to write a complaint, answers,
motions, petitions, judicial notices, notices of
discovery, petitions (especially for great writs),
motions for sanctions, motions to compel, motions
to vacate void judgments, objections, motions to
dismiss, motions to strike, motions in limine (to
suppress evidence), etc., how to communicate in
and out of court with attorneys, judges,
opponents, how to examine and cross examine
witnesses, how to depose witnesses, how to ask
for hearings on motions, how to disqualify judges,
how to file interlocutory and other appeals.
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
17.
Gee, Members, I think I have accomplished
Page 16 of 86
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
everything Bob Hurt recommends in his lengthy

presentation and all we have to do to accomplish the
same outcome, without all that legal mumbo-jumbo, is
serve my Notice and Demand on the State and on the
Court, or mail its letter version to the IRS. Thank you
Bob Hurt!!!
18.
The sorry problem is that we often have
considerable difficulty understanding that the failures
caused by the erroneous misuse of words can put us
off of using something very good, such as my N&D.
19.
I found it difficult to merely read Bob Hurts long
recommendation that we spend all that time and effort
doing all that totally un-necessary legal study and
memorization, that Bob Hurt recommends and offers,
while asking for a monetary donation.
20.
Why should we do any of that when we can
avoid going to court by simply editing my Generic N&D
appropriately, to change the state, the name of the
court and/or county, the case number and the name of
the Wrongly accused and one or two other minor
changes that are explained in the document. And then
serve the N&D and Exhibit A on the State prosecutor
(or other appropriate opposition), and likewise
SERVING the Court, causing the Court to be an inactive
agent of the Plaintiff. The plaintiff being the entire
Government of the STATE, which includes its courts.
21.
The reason I decided to include the Court as an
inactive Party to the action is because of what I
mentioned herein above, being that the courts and the
system in general, address the issue of jurisdiction so
often that it has become ingrained in the minds of the
Page 17 of 86
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
judges and prosecutors, and virtually all attorneys,

that the mere use of the word jurisdiction, or
challenge the jurisdiction causes a synaptic
presumption in the minds of all those who spend all
their working days in the courts; whereupon they
automatically presume, when they see or hear the
words, challenge the jurisdiction to be a reference to
a challenge of the courts jurisdiction. Which is NOT
the case in my N&D!
22.
This is true even when the context presented
includes the word political, because the word
political, is not a word commonly annexed to a
challenge of jurisdiction, because there is truly,
nothing political about the judiciary, in so far as it
relates to trying cases brought before it.
23.
So, in order to bring it forcefully before the mind
of the judge of the court that their judicial authority
has been placed on hold, I determined that SERVING
the Court as an inactive and non-participating party
to this jurisdictional challenge, to the political
jurisdiction of the STATE, would be a good and
legitimate way to accomplish this need.
24.
I contend that this will cause the court clerk,
who is to be orally informed by you that the court is
being SERVED as a party to the Notice and Demand, to
quickly bring the serving of this N&D to the attention
of the judge, and will cause the judge to pay some
significant attention to what is stated in the N&D and
Exhibit A, especially Case Citation 46.
25.
Citation 46 is very powerful! I can hear the
opposing argument, that this cite is two hundred and
Page 18 of 86
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
twenty years old, and cannot possibly be relevant to us

here in 2015.
26.
This might very well be true in some areas of our
system of government, but before anyone throws out
the baby with the bath water they would be well
advised to take a closer look at the baby.
27.
There are some things that will never change, no
matter how many eons of time have elapsed.
28.
One of those never changing principles is set
forth in the SCOTUS writing in that 1795 citation, and
it is reiterated in the Thirteenth Amendment, as part of
the Federal Constitution.
29.
So that it will be clear, here it is for your
immediate and ready consideration; where is there any
part of this writing that is out of date?:
Government Is Foreclosed from
Parity with Real People.
Supreme Court of the United States 1795
(Exhibit A Case cite 46)
"Inasmuch as every government is an artificial person,
an abstraction, and a creature of the mind only, a
government can interface only with other artificial
persons. The imaginary, having neither actuality nor
substance, is foreclosed from creating and attaining
parity with the tangible. The legal manifestation of this
is that no government, as well as any law, agency,
aspect, court, etc. can concern itself with anything
other than corporate, artificial persons and the
contracts between them." S.C.R. 1795, Penhallow v.
Doane's Administraters (3 U.S. 54; 1 L.Ed. 57; 3 Dall.
54), Supreme Court of the United States 1795.
Page 19 of 86
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
30.
Does not the Federal Thirteenth Amendment
dove tail succinctly with the SCOTUS citation above?
31.
And does not the Federal Thirteenth Amendment
incorporate that SCOTUS reasoning solidly into the
Federal CONstitution?:
Neither
slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a

punishment for crime, whereof the party shall have
been duly convicted, shall exist within the United
States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
32.
And is not true that our argument that the
purpose of all of the Fifty Several States requiring a
driver license applicant to present a birth certificate
before any State can have standing to require or to
issue a driver license to a human being, is supported
by both the SCOTUS citation above, and the Federal
Thirteenth Amendment?
33.
Due to the recognition of Natural Law in the two
references herein above; it is clearly established that
the State, as an artificial entity, is never ever going to
be able to achieve standing to require or to even issue
a driver license directly to a willing human applicant.
34.
Due to its artificial NATURE, the State is always
going to have limited standing, to issue driver licenses
only to a contract franchisee of the state. Such person
being a human being who has been fraudulently
indoctrinated by the state to proceed, to act
unknowingly and unwittingly as an artificial person,
as mentioned by SCOTUS in Case Citation 46,
presented herein above. Where the person, having
been deceitfully manipulated into servitude in the
Page 20 of 86
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
governments indoctrination centers, known as public

schools has been fraudulently indoctrinated to believe
he was born into United States citizenship and that he
is REQUIRED to present his birth certificate in order
to be issued a driver license so he can drive his own
motor vehicle.
35.
Please take note as to how flagrantly I
intentionally and knowingly use all those words
abhorred by the Paytri-Idiots!
36.
So how much studying is anyone required to do
in order to successfully benefit from their use of my
very simple Notice and Demand, styled on Basic
Fundamental Natural Principles recognized by SCOTUS
and embodied into the Federal CONstitution in its
Thirteenth Amendment?
37.
Well it would be a good idea for you to
understand that when someone makes a DEMAND,
such action implies and must be based on an
unquestionably solid foundation. This N&Ds
fundamental foundation is NOT in that SCOTUS Citation
or in the Federal Thirteenth Amendment. NO!
38.
First, what is the reasonable basis of SCOTUS
and the Federal Thirteenth Amendment? They are
both founded on the solid concrete bedrock of Natural
Law!
39.
Why else would SCOTUS write what it did in
Citation 46? What would be the likelihood that
SCOTUS would write something like that in 2015? And
why would the CONgress and the States ratify the
Page 21 of 86
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
Thirteenth Amendment if there was any reasonable

argument that could be brought against it?
40.
Why? Because no single individual has any
Naturally imbued authority to command the
subservience of any other individual. This is self
evident. No matter the circumstances conjured up by
any humans, there has never ever been a single
human being that was properly born into slavery. This
is nothing but a recognition of Natural Law. Any claim
or assertion otherwise is nothing but a self-serving
delusion of the criminal minds of those who desire to
control others.
41.
When you properly understand the literal truth
that you were born politically free, and that the
governments (plural) of the United States have
criminally indoctrinated the entire population of this
country into believing the lie that they were born into
citizenship and when you get that straight in your
head, and when you are actually able to overcome the
criminal indoctrination that you were and are
continuing to be subjected to, into total subservience,
then you will KNOW that there is no need to waste
your life studying and memorizing all that legal crap
Bob Hurt, and his ilk, promote, and ask you to donate
money to him for his teaching of his nonsensical crap!
42.
There is no doubt in my mind that what I present
is worth a lot of money, but my Freedom is far more
important to me that any amount of money.
43.
I cannot be free unless you are free. The only
way we can become truly free is to understand what
Freedom is, and to understand, that True Freedom has
Page 22 of 86
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
never ever existed anywhere when a formal

government has been established; supported by the
levying of taxes.
44.
We do truly need a strong government but when
it is financially supported by the governments gun,
then how can we claim to be free?
45.
We need to change the Federal Reserve to a
Central Bank owned by the People of the United
States, with all levels of our government funded by all
the interest collected on loans to private sector
borrowers.
46.
Control of the Peoples Central Bank must be
taken away from CONgress; and the ability of
CONgress to borrow money on the credit of the United
States must be removed from the CONstitution!
47.
I have devised a detailed plan for the operation
of the Peoples Central Bank that I have otherwise
presented so it is not necessary to do so here, but
there is a definite connection because virtually all of
the micro-management of our lives has been prompted
by the governments need for money to fund that
which government has no proper authority to be
involved in.
48.
Our implementation of these Notices, Demanding
that government conform to Natural Law as set forth
by SCOTUS in Case Citation 46, and in the Thirteenth
Amendment to the Federal Constitution, will have a
profound effect on our ability to gain control over our
government.
Page 23 of 86
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
49.
When you truly understand the strength of the
content of this N&D, and my IRS letters, based on the
exact same Natural Foundation, you will promote them
to everyone you know, and we will put the government
back where it belongs, under our control, operating on
money which we freely provide through interest paid
on mortgages, business loans and credit cards.
50.
In closing, please be advised, there is nothing
inherently evil in Factional Reserve Lending, and when
properly understood, interest on borrowed money is
no different than the profit a baker adds to the bread
he sells.
51.
In TRUTH, our monetary problems are caused by
CONgresss misuse of the Fed, intentionally enabled in
the CONstitution by the Founding Fathers. Pay
attention to the words in the CONstitution, not to
those words written outside of it by a bunch of used
car salesmen!
816
817
Cheers,
818
I am Eric Williams, The Radical In The Twilight
819
820
Modified Additional Comments on the implementation of my
821
822
Notice And Demand
823
824
Hi Group,
825
826
827
828
1. This is a modification to my previous Additional Comments

Page 24 of 86
829
830
posted on my public access Yahoo WhoRU Group, regarding the
831
832
implementation of my Notice and Demand challenging the
833
834
Executive Branch to present its proof that it has properly gained
835
836
any manner of jurisdiction over the Wrongly Accused.
837
838
2. Please read this very carefully as I have made many
839
840
explanatory changes. Most significantly in including the Court as
841
842
an inactive party to the litigation. Equally significant is the
843
844
addition of and references in the N&D of the very relevant case
845
846
citations now included in Exhibit A, in items 39-46 thereof, most
847
848
especially #46!
849
850
851
852
3. For those of you emailing me requesting access to Exhibit A
853
854
with the 46 appellate court cases: Due to technical difficulties
855
856
seemingly inherent in Yahoos programming, Exhibit A is now
857
858
posted on my PAWHORU Yahoo Group in the files folder, not in
859
860
the conversations folder.
861
Page 25 of 86
862
863
864
4. I received a question asking, " by what authority do they
865
866
associate a person with the names they use?" I have explained
867
868
the name game in some detail herein further below but to directly
869
870
respond to this question, the names commonly used by everyone
871
872
is a name they acknowledge was derived from a birth certificate.
873
874
Everyone nonthinkingly assumes this name is their property, if
875
876
they bother to think of it at all. If they were to actually think
877
878
about it, they would come to understand that such name cannot
879
880
possibly legally or lawfully belong to them because they had
881
882
absolutely nothing to do with the creation of the name or its
883
884
application to them or its entry on a birth certificate or the filing
885
886
of the BC with the government.
887
888
889
890
5. As all those names were, most likely, conjured up by the
891
892
THE NAME GAME
893
894
Page 1 of 1
Page 26 of 86
895
896
parents of the person using that name as their personal identifier,
897
898
it is self-evident that the parents (or whomever), would have had
899
900
(past tense), first claim of ownership of those names, if the
901
902
parents (or whomever), had entered any claim of such ownership
903
904
on the birth certificates or used some other manner of entering
905
906
such ownership claim.
907
908
909
910
6. However, I am not aware of even one instance where any
911
912
parent (or whomever), entered any manner of claim of ownership
913
914
of any of those names.
915
916
917
918
7. It is self-evident and generally recognized that names are
919
920
property capable of being owned and that names have the
921
922
potential of becoming very valuable. It is also well known that
923
924
whomever came up with the name caused those names to be
925
926
entered on birth certificates which are recorded with the state.
927
Page 27 of 86
928
Again, such person would have had (past tense), priority position
929
930
to claim ownership of the name.
931
932
933
934
8. As names are recognized as being property, it is self-evident
935
936
that names will be owned by some entity. Every state has
937
938
enacted statutes for the state's disposition of abandoned
939
940
property. If the creator of the name (please take care to notice
941
942
that the information entered on a birth certificate does NOT
943
944
indicate who came up with the name entered thereon. It may be
945
946
implied and presumed, but it is NOT clearly set forth), does not
947
948
make himself known, then the state, quite reasonably,
949
950
determines that the names are abandoned property, where it is
951
952
reasonable that the ownership thereof will be assumed by the
953
954
state, for the benefit of everyone in the state. (Fines assessed
955
956
for traffic violations paid by users of state owned names go to
957
958
help the state provide benefits to everyone - everyone then
959
960
benefits from the individual's franchised use of state owned

Page 28 of 86
961
962
property, the name).
963
964
///
965
966
///
967
968
///
969
970
THE BEGINNING OF THE
971
972
BIRTH CERTIFICATE
973
974
Page 2 of 1
975
976
DRIVER LICENSE
977
978
TRUE LEGAL NAME
979
980
ENSLAVEMENT SCAM
981
982
9. When a person presents a birth certificate to be issued a
983
984
driver license, the state presumes the DL applicant is aware that
985
986
the state does not have standing to issue or require anyone to
987
988
have a driver license unless and until the applicant has entered
989
990
himself into a subservient contractual relationship to the state.
991
992
(Were you not educated in the public schools in regard to the
993
Page 29 of 86
994
prohibition of involuntary servitude recognized and established in
995
996
the Federal Thirteenth Amendment? Were you sleeping in class
997
998
when the government paid "teacher" explained this in detail? Or
999
1000
did your teachers "forget" to teach this to you? IF any of them
1001
1002
were themselves aware of it)
1003
1004
10. So then, the state presumes the DL applicant is intending to
1005
1006
apply to the state requesting the state to issue a franchise license
1007
1008
to the applicant to enable the state owned name on the birth
1009
1010
certificate presented, to be used by the applicant as the
1011
1012
applicant's "True Legal Name"'.
1013
1014
11. Once this franchise license "ceremony" has been completed
1015
1016
the state then has standing to require the new franchisee to
1017
1018
conform to all rules established by the state for any activity the
1019
1020
new franchisee engages in under the auspices of that state owned
1021
1022
name.
1023
1024
1025
1026
12. The authority of the state to associate anyone with the name
Page 30 of 86
1027
1028
is accomplished by the "voluntary" application of the applicant to
1029
1030
be issued a franchise license to use that state owned name as the
1031
1032
applicant's "True Legal Name". And such authority is further
1033
1034
established, CONstitutionally, in the Federal Fourteenth
1035
1036
Amendment, in the words: subject to the jurisdiction thereof.
1037
1038
13. However, under Arkansas' abandoned property statute, any
1039
1040
abandoned property can be reclaimed by the original owner, or
1041
1042
such owner's heirs, anytime, with no time limit. Check the
1043
1044
abandoned property statute of your state to determine this
1045
1046
possibility in the state where you live.
1047
1048
Page 3 of 1
1049
1050
1051
1052
14. I have established the validity of the foregoing line of state
1053
1054
ownership of names through Admit or Deny documents served on
1055
1056
the Arkansas State Governor, the state Attorney General, a state
1057
1058
senator and a state representative. More information in regard to
1059
Page 31 of 86
1060
the Admit or Deny that I had served on Arkansas Governor Mike
1061
1062
Beebe is included herein below, and has been posted by me on
1063
1064
my public access Yahoo Group as message #377. Please read
1065
1066
on:
1067
1068
THE NOTICE & DEMAND NEUTRALIZES
1069
1070
ANY PROMISE TO APPEAR
1071
1072
15. I received another email pointing out to me that when issued
1073
1074
a traffic citation the cited person signs a promise to appear in
1075
1076
court, and if he does not appear an arrest warrant will be issued,
1077
1078
What should the person do?
1079
1080
1081
1082
16. Please folks, what I have presented in my Notice and
1083
1084
Demand, and explained in this instant essay, addresses every
1085
1086
possible condition where the charged Wrongly Accused is either
1087
1088
alone or with someone.
1089
1090
17. Additionally, in the new version of my N&D (posted
1091
1092
concurrently with this item), I have specifically addressed this

Page 32 of 86
1093
1094
citation created promise to appear issue.
1095
1096
1097
1098
18. In any event, the information on the N&D negates any
1099
1100
promise entered on any citation because, under the 46 appellate
1101
1102
court case citations annexed thereto as Exhibit A, it is clearly
1103
1104
establish that neither the state or court have authority to proceed
1105
1106
in any manner against the Wrongly Accused unless and until the
1107
1108
charging entity restores or establishes its jurisdictional authority
1109
1110
by presenting the required proof of jurisdiction in writing, on the
1111
1112
record, with an assertion that the purported proof will be testified
1113
1114
to in court by a living breathing eye witness. See case citations
1115
1116
#39-45 in Exhibit A!
1117
1118
WHAT TO DO IF ARRESTED
1119
1120
AFTER SERVING MY N&D
1121
1122
19. It is quite common for traffic court judges to order arrest
1123
1124
warrants issued, to save face in open court, but then not actually
1125
Page 33 of 86
1126
Page 4 of 1
1127
1128
issue them, because they know the State cannot overcome the
1129
1130
Demand presented in the N&D. If an arrest warrant is issued,
1131
1132
and you are arrested, if you stand your ground on the N&D you
1133
1134
had served on BOTH the State and the Court, they will have to
1135
1136
release you. But you must not in any manner cave, or you will
1137
1138
lose! Please read my essay on how to proceed if arrested after
1139
1140
serving my N&D.
1141
1142
1143
1144
20. In regard to my Notice & Demand, previously posted on my
1145
1146
old WHORU Yahoo Group, please disregard that version and any
1147
1148
previous versions that may still be posted on my Group and use
1149
1150
only the NEW version posted concurrently with this new revised
1151
1152
Additional Comments presented here below:
1153
1154
1155
1156
21. First, everyone who has been served with any manner of
1157
1158
summons advising them that a court action has been filed against
Page 34 of 86
1159
1160
them, could and should serve the Prosecutor (or private party
1161
1162
plaintiff), and ALSO SERVE UPON the Court, a Notice Demanding
1163
1164
the charging entity (no matter who the charging entity might be),
1165
1166
to present its proof that the charged individual has voluntarily
1167
1168
agreed to be subject to the jurisdiction of the State, AND, that
1169
1170
the charging entity will present a living, breathing eyewitness to
1171
1172
personally testify in court, under oath, that such witness
1173
1174
personally observed the Wrongly Accused being officially advised
1175
1176
by a State Official, that the Wrongly Accused had the option to
1177
1178
choose to opt out of whatever ceremony was being considered
1179
1180
and this witness will further testify that the Wrongly Accused was
1181
1182
informed by the State Official that the Wrongly Accused had a
1183
1184
Naturally acquired right to live in this society without volunteering
1185
1186
into a subservient relationship to the state, including (but not
1187
1188
limited to), the Wrongly Accuseds right to drive any manner of
1189
1190
vehicle without having possession of a driver license, and that
1191
Page 35 of 86
1192
this Wrongly Accused choose to enter himself voluntarily into a
1193
1194
subservient relationship to the State!!! Please see Case Citations
1195
1196
# 39 - 45 of Exhibit A.
1197
1198
22. This is appropriate even if the State is not the charging
1199
1200
entity, as all litigation proceeds under the authority of the state.
1201
1202
However that is true only IF it can be properly proved that the
1203
1204
Page 5 of 1
1205
1206
state has properly established some manner of jurisdiction over
1207
1208
the Wrongly Accused, acquired, in full conformance with the
1209
1210
Federal Thirteenth Amendment and Case Citation #46, which is
1211
1212
highly doubtful. Actually, impossible!
1213
1214
1215
1216
THIS IS A NOTICE
1217
1218
A MOTION
1219
1220
23. Next, this is a NOTICE NOT a motion. A motion is a request
1221
1222
that the court grant a favor to the party filing the motion. The
1223
1224
filing of a motion constitutes an automatic acknowledgment that

Page 36 of 86
1225
1226
the court has jurisdiction over the accused person filing any
1227
1228
motion, even a motion challenging jurisdiction.
1229
1230
24. You do NOT file a motion. You SERVE the charging entity
1231
1232
and you ALSO SERVE the court, a NOTICE, DEMANDING the state
1233
1234
prove it has more sovereignty than you do. And, you do NOT
1235
1236
include what you just read in the N&D!!!
1237
1238
25. This SERVING on the Court is a new ploy, initiated for the
1239
1240
very first time here in this N&D, its Exhibit A, and Certificate of
1241
1242
Service.
1243
1244
THE FALLACY OF SPECIAL APPEARANCE
1245
1246
26. Next, there are those who think that if they make a "Special
1247
1248
Appearance" that they are protected. In order for a Special
1249
1250
Appearance to be accorded the person purporting to make the
1251
1252
Special Appearance is presumed to recognize the court's authority
1253
1254
to allow such appearance and that the court is willing to listen to
1255
1256
the arguments, and, for the court to then make a determination
1257
Page 37 of 86
1258
as to the validity of the claims presented.
1259
1260
///
1261
1262
///
1263
1264
27. This is clearly a recognition of the jurisdiction of the State
1265
1266
over the person, with the State acting through the court. Using
1267
1268
this ploy will most certainly negate any Notice and Demand
1269
1270
previously served. NOT a good idea!
1271
1272
28. I know there are rules that establish that when the purpose
1273
1274
Page 6 of 1
1275
1276
of the Special Appearance is to challenge jurisdiction, that such
1277
1278
appearance does not constitute a recognition of jurisdiction.
1279
1280
However, that rule is in regard to a challenge of the jurisdiction of
1281
1282
the court, not relevant to our challenge to the political jurisdiction
1283
1284
of the STATE!
1285
1286
29. Additionally, those making the Special Appearance will have
1287
1288
had to have filed a motion, and they will be required to state their
1289
1290
True Legal Name, for the record. As I wrote above, this is NOT a
Page 38 of 86
1291
1292
good idea! It is known as, Shooting yourself in the foot.
1293
1294
30. As explained by SCOTUS in Exhibit A, paragraph 46, and as
1295
1296
Constitutionally established in the Federal Thirteenth
1297
1298
Amendment, the court, as an entity of the state, can only
1299
1300
converse and interact with those who are operating as an artificial
1301
1302
entity, under a True Legal Name franchise owned by the state,
1303
1304
so how can there possibly be any such thing as a "special
1305
1306
appearance" by a real live flesh and blood human not presumed
1307
1308
to be "appearing" under a True Legal Name?
1309
1310
31. Additionally, still on the issue of Special Appearance, why
1311
1312
would there be any need to make any manner of personal
1313
1314
presentation of yourself to an entity that has absolutely no
1315
1316
manner or degree of authority over you? As a politically
1317
1318
sovereign individual do you need to plead with the court? To
1319
1320
grant you W-H-A-T???
1321
1322
THE COURT MUST BE INFORMED
1323
Page 39 of 86
1324
OF HAVING NO STANDING
1325
1326
32. Next, when this Notice is served on the Charging Entity AND
1327
1328
SERVED on the Court (not merely filed with the court), those on
1329
1330
the receiving end (most especially the Court), are immediately
1331
1332
informed - NOTIFIED!! By the word "Notice", that they
1333
1334
(especially the Court), are not being requested to consider or
1335
1336
make a determination.
1337
1338
33. They are being presented with a Notice, from a politically
1339
1340
equal or politically superior entity, DEMANDING that the Charging
1341
1342
Entity present its proof that it has some manner of superior
1343
1344
Page 7 of 1
1345
1346
commanding jurisdiction over the person serving the Demand,
1347
1348
acquired by the Wrongly Accused having willingly given up the
1349
1350
political independence the Wrongly Accused was born with.
1351
1352
34. And, as is clearly established in my N&D, the charging entity
1353
1354
must have available, not merely certified documents from the
1355
1356
governments files, but a real live living eyewitness who will

Page 40 of 86
1357
1358
testify in a court of law, under oath, that such eyewitness was
1359
1360
personally present and saw and heard you, the Wrongly Accused,
1361
1362
being informed by an on duty Government Official, who informed
1363
1364
you that you were born free and politically independent from any
1365
1366
manner of government intervention in your life.
1367
1368
35. Additionally, it is asserted by the charging entity, that this
1369
1370
eyewitness will testify, that such Government Official further
1371
1372
informed you that you were at that moment able to drive your
1373
1374
motor vehicle without any manner of government issued driver
1375
1376
license; and that you could engage in any manner of livelihood
1377
1378
without any manner of government issued license or permit and
1379
1380
without any obligation to pay any manner of taxation. And, this
1381
1382
eyewitness will further testify, under oath, in a court of law, that
1383
1384
this eyewitness heard you acknowledge all the rights you had
1385
1386
been thereupon reminded of that you would be relinquishing, and
1387
1388
that you none the less eagerly agreed to give them all up in order
1389
Page 41 of 86
1390
for you to be subservient to the government. This argument is
1391
1392
supported by Exhibit A, paragraphs # 39-45.
1393
1394
36. And, you do NOT present or mention your political status in
1395
1396
your N&D!!! If you were to make such claim then the burden of
1397
1398
proof could be determined to shift to you and you could be called
1399
1400
upon to prove it. By your not mentioning it you keep the burden
1401
1402
of proof on the charging entity! You have no need to present
1403
1404
your political status!
1405
1406
1407
1408
37. When the word "Notice" is followed by the word "Demand",
1409
1410
the served parties, including the Court, are thereby informed -
1411
1412
NOTIFIED, that the person serving them is contending that he
1413
1414
has been Wrongly Accused because he is asserting that he is not
1415
1416
subject to their jurisdiction (no matter that he signed a promise
1417
1418
Page 8 of 1
1419
1420
to appear), and that if the served entities contend otherwise,
1421
1422
those claiming jurisdiction must present their proof that they

Page 42 of 86
1423
1424
have properly gained such jurisdiction, through the voluntary and
1425
1426
fully informed intentional submission of the challenging Wrongly
1427
1428
Accused person, without the charging entity having violated the
1429
1430
Federal Thirteenth Amendment and in compliance with Exhibit
1431
1432
A, 46. AND, neither do you add any of this to the N&D!!!
1433
1434
APPEARING IN COURT
1435
1436
38. Next, "appearance". In order to understand why the word
1437
1438
"appear" is used in court, consider the meaning of the word,
1439
1440
"disappear".
1441
1442
39. "Disappear" means to suddenly vanish, poof, gone, to be no
1443
1444
longer visible, to be no longer present where it was a moment
1445
1446
ago.
1447
1448
40. "Appear" means the opposite of "Disappear". "Appear"
1449
1450
means to suddenly materialize,. For something or someone to
1451
1452
suddenly be present where it did not previously exist; to have
1453
1454
suddenly materialized and then be visible or at least to be
1455
Page 43 of 86
1456
recognized as being present where it previously was not.
1457
1458
MORE ON THE STATES
1459
1460
TRUE LEGAL NAME
1461
1462
ENSLAVEMENT SCAM
1463
1464
41. This is the States ploy to work around the Natural inherent
1465
1466
barrier preventing the artificial entity State, from directly inter
1467
1468
relating with real live humans, acknowledged by the United
1469
1470
States Supreme Court Case Citation set forth in Paragraph 46 of
1471
1472
Exhibit A, wherein the Supreme Court of the United States
1473
1474
presented its analysis acknowledging that it is impossible for
1475
1476
artificial entities such as governments, to directly interact with
1477
1478
real live tangible human persons.
1479
1480
42. This Natural inherent barrier required those persons
1481
1482
wrongly managing government to devise a means whereby the
1483
1484
state could legitimately require real live Naturally politically
1485
1486
independent humans to somehow become subservient to the
1487
1488
Page 9 of 1
Page 44 of 86
1489
1490
state.
1491
1492
43. What the State has done in establishing this True Legal
1493
1494
Name (TLN), ploy can not and does not change the fact that as
1495
1496
it is an artificial entity the State cannot interact directly with real
1497
1498
live tangible persons.
1499
1500
44. SO those politicians wrongly managing the State devised the
1501
1502
ploy of having real live persons represent an artificial persona
1503
1504
owned by the state, to be known as a True Legal Name ( TLN)
1505
1506
by having the real live person represent himself, by having the
1507
1508
TLN appear through the representation of the real live human.
1509
1510
1511
1512
45. Consider "appear" together with "represent" and or
1513
1514
"represent yourself". In order for an entity to be in a condition of
1515
1516
"representing", there must be at least two entities involved.
1517
1518
46. When you represent yourself, the two entities involved are
1519
1520
your physical human entity representing and speaking for the
1521
Page 45 of 86
1522
artificial persona True Legal name that gas no ability to speak
1523
1524
for itself, created for you by the State at your request because
1525
1526
you had been fraudulently indoctrinated by the State to believe
1527
1528
you were applying for a driver license.
1529
1530
47. When a defendant is represented by an attorney everyone
1531
1532
presumes the two entities involved are the attorney and the
1533
1534
defendant. In truth, however, there are four entities involved.
1535
1536
///
1537
1538
///
1539
1540
48. This quadrangle is comprised of the two real live flesh and
1541
1542
blood human beings (the attorney and the client), and the two
1543
1544
artificial personas (being the two True Legal Names), assumed
1545
1546
by the spirits living in those two physical human beings bodies.
1547
1548
49. It is important here to understand that these two artificial
1549
1550
personas are appearing in the Court as franchisees using True
1551
1552
Legal Names, owned by the State, that such names were not
1553
1554
part of the physical entities as created by Nature.

Page 46 of 86
1555
1556
Page 10 of 1
1557
1558
50. These artificial personas are the "True Legal Name"
1559
1560
franchises assigned by the State to the physical bodies when the
1561
1562
physical bodies had been fraudulently indoctrinated to believe
1563
1564
they were simply applying for a driver license. The DL applicant
1565
1566
was first, unknowingly, (through the presentation of the birth
1567
1568
certificate), voluntarily applying to the State, requesting that
1569
1570
the State grant the human bodies a franchise license to use
1571
1572
names entered on birth certificates, where, unknown and
1573
1574
unrevealed to the DL applicants, the names on the birth
1575
1576
certificates had previously become owned by the state under the
1577
1578
state's abandoned property statutes.
1579
1580
NO PAYTRI-IDIOT
1581
1582
NONSCENSE HERE
1583
1584
51. I want it clearly understood that the foregoing explanation
1585
1586
has nothing what-so-ever to do with the Paytri-Idiocy claiming
1587
Page 47 of 86
1588
that the entry of the name on BCs by parents causes the baby
1589
1590
referenced therein to become the property of the state. Nothing
1591
1592
could be further from the truth.
1593
1594
52. And neither is there any truth in the Paytri-Idiot contention
1595
1596
that birth certificates are bundled and sold to investors.
1597
1598
REPRESENTING YOURSELF
1599
1600
53. The above explanation of how names become "True Legal
1601
1602
Names" in conjunction with "representing yourself" comes as a
1603
1604
result of careful analysis of the required presentation of a BC to
1605
1606
the state, whereby the state acquires standing to issue or require
1607
1608
the possession of a driver license.
1609
1610
1611
1612
54. Hollywood movie actor Richard Gere "appears" as Lancelot in
1613
1614
the movie, First Knight. I highly recommend everyone watch the
1615
1616
first five minutes of that movie, formerly posted on my Yahoo
1617
1618
Group as conversation #312, but apparently removed by those
1619
1620
who are afraid of the truth.

Page 48 of 86
1621
1622
ABANDONED PROPERTY STATUTES
1623
1624
ENABLE STATE NAME OWNERSHIP
1625
1626
55. It is important here to understand that there is no
1627
1628
Page 11 of 1
1629
1630
information on any BC that can be used to connect any BC to any
1631
1632
particular person. No human ever born has the ability to have
1633
1634
personal knowledge as to where or when they were born or who
1635
1636
their own mother was. No one can properly, lawfully or legally
1637
1638
claim any ownership interest in the birth certificate that was
1639
1640
created to record their birth, and neither can they properly legally
1641
1642
or lawfully claim any ownership interest of the name entered
1643
1644
thereon. (That is, unless the statutes of their state allow a
1645
1646
reclaiming of abandoned property and the state's procedures are
1647
1648
followed).
1649
1650
1651
1652
56. The child had absolutely nothing to do with the selection of
1653
Page 49 of 86
1654
the name, or the entry thereof on any birth certificate, or of the
1655
1656
filing of that document with the government.
1657
1658
57. Every state has a statute regarding the disposition of
1659
1660
abandoned property. In Arkansas where I live it is under Title
1661
1662
18, Chapter 28, Section 202. Under Section 202 Arkansas
1663
1664
becomes the owner of all property deemed to have been
1665
1666
abandoned, not specified in previous sections, five years after
1667
1668
such property was last contacted by its last known (or unknown)
1669
1670
owner. Because of this, Arkansas becomes the owner of all
1671
1672
names five years after the filing of the birth certificates.
1673
1674
58. Every state has similar abandoned property statutes.
1675
1676
Therefore it is impossible for anyone to properly claim ownership
1677
1678
of the name entered on any birth certificate (see exception noted
1679
1680
above in 55).
1681
1682
59. This is not a significant problem, however the knowledge
1683
1684
hereof makes it easier to understand how the states use the birth
1685
1686
certificate, True Legal Name driver license scam to fraudulently

Page 50 of 86
1687
1688
gain dominion over those who unknowingly and unintentionally
1689
1690
volunteer themselves into this subservience scam.
1691
1692
1693
1694
60. Anyone can use a name seemingly identical to the name
1695
1696
entered on "their" birth certificate, without causing them to
1697
1698
become subservient to the state. Simply stop claiming the name
1699
1700
they use was derived from a birth certificate.
1701
1702
Page 12 of 1
1703
1704
61. This can reasonably be established because you did not
1705
1706
become attached to your name because it was written on a paper
1707
1708
document that you had nothing to do with and did not understand
1709
1710
and could not read.
1711
1712
HOW YOU ACTUALLY
1713
1714
ACQUIRED YOUR NAME
1715
1716
62. You became attached to your name by the utterance thereof
1717
1718
by your mother and father. They used their human voices to
1719
Page 51 of 86
1720
orally utter a special sound that became your name. You learned
1721
1722
it and it became attached to you by your hearing it through your
1723
1724
ears. It became your property through a Natural process that
1725
1726
had absolutely nothing to do with any birth certificate. So stop
1727
1728
claiming the birth certificate as your source!
1729
1730
THE LAW OF NECESSITY
1731
1732
63. Additionally, the Law of Necessity can allow anyone to use a
1733
1734
driver license for identification purposes and a Social Security
1735
1736
Number to maintain employment and a bank account, and still
1737
1738
not be operating under any franchise license issued by the state.
1739
1740
I determined this by applying the dicta written by the Supreme
1741
1742
Court of the United States in a case named, Holy Trinity Church
1743
1744
vs, United States, 143 U.S. 457, 12 S.Ct. 511, 36 L.Ed. 226.
1745
1746
However, such DL must not be presented to a police officer
1747
1748
during a traffic stop, except for identification purposes. It would
1749
1750
be much better to convert that DL into a state issued ID card,
1751
1752
however that too has inherent problems with vehicle insurance

Page 52 of 86
1753
1754
and in some states, vehicle registration. So, depending on your
1755
1756
individual preference and ability to talk in a friendly manner to
1757
1758
police officers, you determine which document would best serve
1759
1760
your needs.
1761
1762
BIRTH CERTIFICATE SCAM PROVED
1763
1764
BY ADMIT OR DENY DISCOVERY
1765
1766
64. During a no driver license prosecution of me in Arkansas in
1767
1768
2009, I served the state governor, attorney general, a state
1769
1770
senator and representative, with Admit or Deny documents (the
1771
1772
one served on the governor is posted on my public access Yahoo
1773
1774
Page 13 of 1
1775
1776
Group as conversation #377), which the rules of court required
1777
1778
him to respond to within thirty days, or everything asserted
1779
1780
therein would be deemed admitted by him.
1781
1782
65. The governor did not respond until sixty days had passed,
1783
1784
causing everything therein to be deemed admitted as correct,
1785
Page 53 of 86
1786
under the Arkansas Rules of Civil Procedure.
1787
1788
66. (The Governor did not ever respond to deny anything
1789
1790
asserted. Instead he filed a motion to quash, which was granted
1791
1792
by a judge who was presiding over hearings conducted under two
1793
1794
arrest warrants that had expired three years before I was
1795
1796
arrested, causing her rulings to be void, due to fraudulent illegal
1797
1798
prosecution and, more significantly, because of the fact that the
1799
1800
Governors motion to quash was not filed timely, and was not
1801
1802
properly legally founded.
1803
1804
67. This case against me was dismissed but the dismissal was
1805
1806
not based on my serving a N&D, but was based on Arkansas state
1807
1808
law that invalidates anything done under an expired arrest
1809
1810
warrant.)
1811
1812
1813
1814
68. The case was dismissed when I filed with the Arkansas
1815
1816
District Court, a Demand to be accorded a trial by jury, the first
1817
1818
time any such trial had ever been granted in Arkansas in regard
Page 54 of 86
1819
1820
to a traffic citation. The case was transferred to the Arkansas
1821
1822
Circuit Court, and dismissed when I brought the expired arrest
1823
1824
warrants to the attention of the circuit court judge. But the
1825
1826
Admissions of Governor Beebe (and the three additional Arkansas
1827
1828
politicians mentioned herein above), are none-the-less, deemed
1829
1830
admitted and therefore, valid.
1831
1832
1833
1834
69. If you do not understand the irrefutable self-evident facts set
1835
1836
forth herein in regard to your inability to have any personal
1837
1838
knowledge as to the facts of your birth, then you need to do
1839
1840
some very serious thinking!!! And be ready to explain how you
1841
1842
came to such personal knowledge. There is a considerable
1843
1844
difference between strong belief and actual personal knowledge.
1845
1846
Personal knowledge can only be acquired when a person is an
1847
1848
Page 14 of 1
1849
1850
eyewitness to an event and has the cognitive ability to take
1851
Page 55 of 86
1852
cognitive notice of the event as it occurs. Acquiring information
1853
1854
by your parents telling you, does NOT constitute personal
1855
1856
knowledge - it is legally known as hearsay.
1857
1858
BACK TO THE ISSUE OF ARTIFICIAL PERSONAS,
1859
1860
APPEARING AND REPRESENTATION
1861
1862
70. Because these artificial personas ("True Legal Names"), are
1863
1864
not physical entities, they are unable to speak for themselves, so
1865
1866
the flesh and blood entities must speak for them, must represent
1867
1868
them in court, enabling them to "appear".
1869
1870
1871
1872
71. This is not readily apparent or easily understood when an
1873
1874
accused is represented by an attorney, but is more easily
1875
1876
understood when an accused is purported to "represent himself"
1877
1878
in court.
1879
1880
1881
1882
72. Because the artificial persona cannot speak for itself, the
1883
1884
flesh and blood must be present to speak for the artificial

Page 56 of 86
1885
1886
persona. When the case is called, and the flesh and blood entity
1887
1888
comes forward and states his "True Legal Name" for the record,
1889
1890
such being the artificial persona, the artificial persona then
1891
1892
suddenly "appears" before the court, thereby causing two entities
1893
1894
to be present with the real live flesh and blood entity being
1895
1896
physically present to speak for and represent the artificial
1897
1898
persona that does not physically exist. (It does exist, and is NOT
1899
1900
fictional, but artificial).
1901
1902
1903
1904
73. Think of Walmart. You have never ever actually gone to
1905
1906
Walmart. You think you have but you have not. Walmart is a
1907
1908
corporation. Walmart does not physically exist. Walmart exists
1909
1910
only in the corporate papers which created Walmart as an
1911
1912
artificial persona. Where you have gone many times is to stores
1913
1914
owned by the Walmart corporation.
1915
1916
1917
Page 57 of 86
1918
THE ERROR INHERENT IN
1919
1920
DESIGNATION AS DEFENDANT
1921
1922
74. Next is "defendant". When you designate yourself as a
1923
1924
"defendant" in papers you serve or file, no matter what you might
1925
1926
Page 15 of 1
1927
1928
present in the body of those papers, your designation of yourself
1929
1930
as "defendant" constitutes your acknowledgment that your
1931
1932
political status is such that properly allows you to be charged by
1933
1934
the plaintiff, and that in order for the charges to be dismissed,
1935
1936
you have acknowledged that you must present mitigating
1937
1938
information of some manner, to be evaluated by the court, for
1939
1940
the court to determine whether or not the trial should go forward
1941
1942
against you.
1943
1944
75. Thereby you have acknowledged the jurisdiction of the court,
1945
1946
which is an entity of the state, so you have thereby likewise
1947
1948
acknowledged the jurisdiction of the state, over you.
1949
1950
76. All of this is covered in my Notice and Demand as written.

Page 58 of 86
1951
1952
Do NOT change the content or wording or present yourself in
1953
1954
their court after serving it because if you do, you will lose!
1955
1956
1957
1958
77. An accused who contends that he is not subject to any
1959
1960
manner of jurisdiction of the charging entity, must not shoot
1961
1962
himself in the foot by designating himself as a defendant, no
1963
1964
matter that the charging entity and the court designate the
1965
1966
accused as being a defendant.
1967
1968
1969
1970
78. When an accused contends he is not subject to any manner
1971
1972
of jurisdiction of the charging entity, the accused must properly
1973
1974
designate himself as "Wrongly Accused", or even better, as
1975
1976
"Wrongly Accused Belligerent Litigant". Read what Federal Judge
1977
1978
Fee stated in United States v. Johnson, 76 F. Supp. 538, 539 (D.
1979
1980
Pa. 1947):
1981
1982
"The privilege against self-incrimination is neither accorded
1983
Page 59 of 86
1984
to the passive resistant, nor to the person who is ignorant of
1985
1986
his rights, nor to one indifferent thereto. It is a FIGHTING
1987
1988
clause. It's benefits can be retained only by sustained
1989
1990
COMBAT. It cannot be claimed by attorney or solicitor. It is
1991
1992
valid only when insisted upon by a BELLIGERENT claimant in
1993
1994
person. The one who is persuaded by honeyed words or
1995
1996
moral suasion to testify or produce documents rather than
1997
1998
make a last ditch stand, simply loses the protection. . . . He
1999
2000
Page 16 of 1
2001
2002
must refuse to answer or produce, and test the matter in
2003
2004
contempt proceedings, or by habeas corpus. McAlister vs.
2005
2006
Henkel, 201 U.S. 90, 26 S.Ct. 385, 50 L. Ed. 671;
2007
2008
Commonwealth vs. Shaw, 4 Cush. 594, 50 Am.Dec. 813;
2009
2010
Orum vs. State, 38 Ohio App. 171, 175"
2011
2012
79. Although Judge Fee's comment is specific to self-
2013
2014
incrimination, it applies to every instance where your rights are
2015
2016
an issue. Your rights belong to you, they are an integral part of

Page 60 of 86
2017
2018
you, they cannot be asserted by anyone on your behalf.
2019
2020
80. Can you imagine that any attorney you hired would stand up
2021
2022
to the judge and insist that the government (or whomever the
2023
2024
plaintiff might be) does not have standing to proceed against you
2025
2026
until it presents proof that you agreed to submit yourself to these
2027
2028
proceedings? And must be attested to in court, by a living
2029
2030
eyewitness?
2031
2032
POLITICAL JURISDICTION
2033
2034
81. Next, Political jurisdiction, What is political jurisdiction
2035
2036
("PJ")? Everything that occurs under any level of government,
2037
2038
where the government is involved, is political.
2039
2040
82. In conformance with Natural Law, governments only operate
2041
2042
over real live humans through some manner of voluntary
2043
2044
submission; as declared by SCOTUS in 1795, as presented in
2045
2046
Exhibit A, as Case Citation 46, and as embodied in the Federal
2047
2048
CONstitution, in the Thirteenth Amendment thereto.
2049
Page 61 of 86
2050
THE TWO STYLES OF JURISDICTION
2051
2052
83. In order for the government to be able to have and exercise
2053
2054
controlling authority over any individual human, the government
2055
2056
must first entice each individual to volunteer himself into
2057
2058
submission, known as jurisdiction, I characterize this as political
2059
2060
jurisdiction or civil contract jurisdiction, depending on the
2061
2062
circumstances.
2063
2064
2065
2066
84. For all practical purposes the two jurisdictions are the same,
2067
2068
they both have the exact same effect on the individuals degree
2069
2070
Page 17 of 1
2071
2072
of submission, being total and complete. However, when dealing
2073
2074
with the opposition in legal matters it can be critically important
2075
2076
to mention the specific style of jurisdiction that is applicable and
2077
2078
if that is difficult to determine, then mention both!
2079
2080
CITIZENSHIP JURISDICTION
2081
2082
85. Those who volunteer themselves into political jurisdiction are

Page 62 of 86
2083
2084
deemed to be "citizens". It took me some time to weed out all
2085
2086
the nonsense in regard to how United States citizenship is
2087
2088
acquired, but when I did I came to understand that the one and
2089
2090
only way a real live person born on the land area claimed by the
2091
2092
government of the United States to be under its political
2093
2094
jurisdiction, is through the voluntary claiming act of each
2095
2096
individual.
2097
2098
86. This determination is supported by both the 13th and 14th
2099
2100
Amendments, and in Exhibit A Case Cite 46.
2101
2102
87. "Citizenship" is clearly NOT acquired through birth, or under
2103
2104
the Fourteenth Amendment or through a driver license
2105
2106
application, Social Security application, the use of Federal
2107
2108
Reserve Notes or any other means deemed by Paytri-Idiots to be
2109
2110
"adhesion contracts".
2111
2112
88. There is no such thing as an unrevealed adhesion contract.
2113
2114
In order for anyone to be held accountable to a contract, the
2115
Page 63 of 86
2116
person must have been informed or at least given the opportunity
2117
2118
to become informed and consciously knowingly declined to be
2119
2120
informed while still agreeing to the contract.
2121
2122
2123
2124
89. According to the rules established by government, the terms
2125
2126
of any and all contracts must be fully disclosed or the contract is
2127
2128
either void or non existent.
2129
2130
2131
2132
90. The Notice and Demand that I designed requires the
2133
2134
charging entity to present its proof, from its files existing at the
2135
2136
time and date that the charges were lodged against the Wrongly
2137
2138
Accused (when the citation was issued, NOT at the later time and
2139
2140
date when a complaint was filed with the court and the
2141
2142
Page 18 of 1
2143
2144
arraignment date was set or thereafter, when the N&D is served
2145
2146
and filed by the Wrongly Accused), that the charging entity had
2147
2148
gained political jurisdiction over the Wrongly Accused in full

Page 64 of 86
2149
2150
compliance with the prohibition of involuntary servitude
2151
2152
recognized and established in the Federal Thirteenth Amendment.
2153
2154
91. AND, that any documentary evidence presented by the
2155
2156
opposition MUST and will be substantiated by the oral testimony
2157
2158
of a living eyewitness who will testify in a court of law, that the
2159
2160
eyewitness was present and observed a government official
2161
2162
inform the Wrongly Accused of what the Wrongly Accused would
2163
2164
be giving up and surrendering himself into, and that having been
2165
2166
thus informed, that the Wrongly Accused still went ahead and
2167
2168
volunteered himself into either political or contractual servitude to
2169
2170
the government.
2171
2172
2173
2174
92. Which brings me to "civil contract" jurisdiction. This is
2175
2176
presented in considerable detail herein below, but for the
2177
2178
moment, "civil contract" jurisdiction is acquired by the state when
2179
2180
a free born person "voluntarily" presents a birth certificate to (he
2181
Page 65 of 86
2182
thinks), be issued a driver license. However, before the state has
2183
2184
standing to issue or require anyone to apply for or possess a
2185
2186
driver license, the state must first, through some means, entice
2187
2188
the free born person to volunteer himself into some manner of
2189
2190
subservience to the state. This is self-evident due to the
2191
2192
prohibition of involuntary servitude of the Federal Thirteenth
2193
2194
Amendment, and the 1795 writing of the SCOTUS presented in
2195
2196
Exhibit A, Item # 46.
2197
2198
2199
2200
93. When the driver license applicant presents a birth certificate
2201
2202
( which is NOT his property), to be issued a DL, the very first
2203
2204
unknown and unrevealed event during that "official ceremony" is
2205
2206
the granting of a franchise license to the applicant, for the
2207
2208
applicant to thereafter use that state owned name as the
2209
2210
applicant's "True Legal Name".
2211
2212
2213
2214
94. Thereafter, anytime the person engages in any activity under

Page 66 of 86
2215
2216
that state owned name, the person will be required to conform to
2217
2218
CIVIL CONTRACT JURISDICTION
2219
2220
Page 19 of 1
2221
2222
any rules enacted by the state in regard to that activity, such as
2223
2224
paying income tax, getting married with a license and or
2225
2226
"educating" or inoculating their children, among one or two other
2227
2228
government regulated activities.
2229
2230
2231
2232
95. As mentioned above, the Notice and Demand that I designed
2233
2234
requires the charging entity to present its proof, from its files
2235
2236
existing at the time and date that the charges were lodged
2237
2238
against the Wrongly Accused (when the citation was issued, NOT
2239
2240
at the later time and date when a complaint was filed with the
2241
2242
court and the arraignment date was set or thereafter, when the
2243
2244
N&D is served and filed by the Wrongly Accused), that the
2245
2246
charging entity had gained civil contract jurisdiction over the
2247
Page 67 of 86
2248
Wrongly Accused in full compliance with the prohibition of
2249
2250
involuntary servitude recognized and established in the Federal
2251
2252
Thirteenth Amendment, with a living eyewitness to testify
2253
2254
thereto.
2255
2256
///
2257
2258
///
2259
2260
96. Next, the outcome. Please understand that the governments
2261
2262
of this society have a very serious problem. The citizens of this
2263
2264
country have demanded more and more perks to be provided by
2265
2266
the government, all of these are very expensive.
2267
2268
97. The governments (plural), must through some means raise
2269
2270
or acquire the money to pay for all these ever increasing perks,
2271
2272
not to overlook the ever increasing numbers of persons receiving
2273
2274
these expensive perks.
2275
2276
2277
2278
98. The governments have implemented taxation on everything
2279
2280
realistically possible, and raised these taxes to the maximum that

Page 68 of 86
2281
2282
will be tolerated. The Federal Government has utilized its option
2283
2284
of creating money out of thin air to the point that such inflation
2285
2286
has caused the current dollar to have less purchasing power than
2287
2288
S&H Green Stamps.
2289
2290
2291
2292
99. State governments do not have that option and have devised
2293
2294
the fraudulent birth certificate driver license True Legal Name
2295
2296
THE OUTCOME
2297
2298
Page 20 of 1
2299
2300
scam to bring all those who have been too busy to pay attention,
2301
2302
under the political and or civil contract jurisdiction of the state
2303
2304
governments.
2305
2306
2307
2308
100. There is no doubt or question that what these governments
2309
2310
have been and are doing is totally fraudulent, but the
2311
2312
governments have been doing this for so long that their scam has
2313
Page 69 of 86
2314
been incorporated into our society to such an extent that we can't
2315
2316
hardly function without claiming a birth certificate in order to be
2317
2318
issued a driver license for identification purposes, and Social
2319
2320
Security Numbers in order to be employed and or open bank
2321
2322
accounts (not to overlook, paying income taxes).
2323
2324
2325
2326
101. If any significant percentage of our population were to
2327
2328
understand what I have written here, and utilize the Notice and
2329
2330
Demand that I have devised, the financial impact on the
2331
2332
government would be devastating.
2333
2334
2335
2336
102. Because of the irrefutable self-evident facts that I have
2337
2338
presented herein, the possibility of any charging entity
2339
2340
responding to present any manner of proof of its jurisdiction over
2341
2342
any Wrongly Accused is highly unlikely. Anything the prosecution
2343
2344
or opposition might present will only be on the record because of
2345
2346
the government's fraud in inducing everyone into some manner

Page 70 of 86
2347
2348
of subservience.
2349
2350
103. There is no statute of limitation in regard to fraud. And, the
2351
2352
requirement that the government bring forward a living
2353
2354
eyewitness to testify as to the voluntary act of the Wrongly
2355
2356
Accused, will be totally impossible as there was no such fully
2357
2358
informed voluntary act and there cannot possibly be a real live
2359
2360
eyewitness to testify thereto.
2361
2362
104. That is, there is no possibility what-so-ever that the
2363
2364
government can ever establish any manner of jurisdiction over
2365
2366
the Wrongly Accused. Because of this the government, the
2367
2368
charging entity and the court, will drop the matter, just let it die.
2369
2370
There is no possibility that the court is going to make an official
2371
2372
ruling against the government in favor of the Wrongly Accused!
2373
2374
Page 21 of 1
2375
2376
105. I first applied this jurisdictional attack in Federal Court in
2377
2378
1970, where the IRS had charged me with criminal intent to fail
2379
Page 71 of 86
2380
to file or pay income tax. I walked out of that court in less than
2381
2382
five minutes and have never ever been bothered by the IRS
2383
2384
since, and neither have I ever filed or paid.
2385
2386
2387
2388
106. However, that Federal Court did not give me a clear win,
2389
2390
the court did not enter a ruling on my behalf, not on your life!
2391
2392
That court informed me that it was taking the matter under
2393
2394
consideration and I would be notified. That was forty-five years
2395
2396
ago and I am still waiting.
2397
2398
2399
2400
107. If any of the Paytri-Idiot adhesion contracts or Fourteenth
2401
2402
Amendment citizenship by birth certificate issues were actually
2403
2404
true, then why did the Federal Judge in the IRS prosecution of me
2405
2406
not apply them to me and convict me and sent me to prison for
2407
2408
several years, as they did my partner in the 1969 income tax
2409
2410
rebellion which resulted in our prosecution by the IRS.
2411
2412
Page 72 of 86
2413
2414
108. My partner was convicted and spent several years in
2415
2416
Federal prison because he went to court represented by an
2417
2418
attorney.
2419
2420
109. I was the out front leader of that income tax rebellion. I
2421
2422
gave hundreds of presentations to thousands of attendants at
2423
2424
meetings all over Southern California and wrote many articles
2425
2426
against the income tax which were widely published.
2427
2428
110. My partner did not give even one presentation and neither
2429
2430
did he write even one article against the income tax. He was the
2431
2432
financial backer. I was the one the IRS really wanted to send to
2433
2434
prison, but they could not establish any manner of jurisdiction
2435
2436
over me.
2437
2438
111. But, please understand, that Federal Court judge did NOT
2439
2440
give me a declared win over the IRS!
2441
2442
2443
2444
112. These are issues where the government cannot win and
2445
Page 73 of 86
2446
Page 22 of 1
2447
2448
dares not lose. Although it is clear that I totally defeated the IRS
2449
2450
in that 1970 incident, no one can use that case as a case citation,
2451
2452
because, technically, that case is still pending.
2453
2454
2455
2456
113. There have been many members of my group who have
2457
2458
used the generic IRS letters, (now posted on my new Private,
2459
2460
member only Yahoo Group), to rid themselves of the IRS. Many
2461
2462
of them are drawing Social Security and other government
2463
2464
financial benefits, but are no longer hassled by the IRS in regard
2465
2466
to income tax filing or paying.
2467
2468
2469
2470
114. There is a current case in Florida where Terry is being
2471
2472
prosecuted for filing fraudulent charges against government
2473
2474
officials.
2475
2476
///
2477
2478
///
Page 74 of 86
2479
2480
115. As I understand this case, Terry had been the foreman of a
2481
2482
statutorily created Grand Jury where the government prosecutor
2483
2484
kept interfering with investigations initiated by the Grand Jury
2485
2486
instead of having been initiated by the government prosecutor.
2487
2488
Because of this prosecutor interference, Terry disbanded the
2489
2490
government created Grand Jury and Terry then purported to
2491
2492
create his own Grand Jury under the Florida Constitution which
2493
2494
proclaims that all power is inherent in the people.
2495
2496
2497
2498
116. This self proclaimed Grand Jury then proceeded to file
2499
2500
charges with the county authorities against several government
2501
2502
officials. As the ring leader Terry was arrested and charged with
2503
2504
from 9 to 12 charges of making false charges, each one with a
2505
2506
maximum penalty of five years in prison.
2507
2508
2509
2510
117. Terry has been counseled by certain men in Florida, and
2511
Page 75 of 86
2512
advised to file a Notice and Demand that I created especially for
2513
2514
Terry, in which was included the statement that Terry would not
2515
2516
present himself in court unless and until the State of Florida
2517
2518
presented facts to prove it had properly gained some manner of
2519
2520
jurisdiction over Terry, in full conformance with the Federal
2521
2522
Thirteenth Amendment.
2523
2524
2525
2526
Page 23 of 1
2527
2528
118. Terry has refused to file this and is insisting that he wants
2529
2530
to go to court, to have a trial by jury, so that he can be
2531
2532
exonerated of all these "phony" charges.
2533
2534
2535
2536
119. This is not a trial limited to Terry, this is a trial brought
2537
2538
forward because of Terry's self created Common Law Grand Jury.
2539
2540
There was a hearing on December 12th, last, in which the judge
2541
2542
determined that Terry was competent to "represent himself" in a
2543
2544
trial that was at that time set to be held on February 9th.

Page 76 of 86
2545
2546
120. After that his 12/12/14 hearing Terry did then serve and
2547
2548
filed a version of my N&D that he had modified, without
2549
2550
consulting with me, taking out the paragraphs informing the court
2551
2552
that he would not be appearing at any event set by the court
2553
2554
unless and until STATE OF FLORIDA presented proof of its
2555
2556
jurisdiction over Terry that Terry could not refute.
2557
2558
121. After serving and filing that now totally ineffective N&D,
2559
2560
Terry then filed a MOTION, requesting a 90 day continuance of
2561
2562
the trial date for the purpose of deposing witnesses.
2563
2564
122. The Florida court gleefully (I am sure), granted Terrys 90
2565
2566
day continuance request, denied his N&D, characterizing it as a
2567
2568
motion, and also denied Terrys request to depose witnesses.
2569
2570
123. The last I had heard about Terry, was that he had hired an
2571
2572
attorney, who demanded a $10,000.00 retainer, and that it was
2573
2574
expected that this attorney would negotiate a plea bargain where
2575
2576
Terry would be placed on extended probation and ordered to pay
2577
Page 77 of 86
2578
a substantial fine.
2579
2580
124. To me this prosecution of Terry has been and is a clear
2581
2582
move against the Common Law Grand Jury Movement now so
2583
2584
active throughout this country.
2585
2586
2587
2588
125. There are those who hope to work out some manner of
2589
2590
protocol wherein the government would support the creation of
2591
2592
Common Law Grand Juries by those who style themselves as
2593
2594
being the People of Florida. The argument of those advocating
2595
2596
such Grand Juries is that such is necessary to straighten out the
2597
2598
Page 24 of 1
2599
2600
fraudulent system which caused and allowed Terry to be charged
2601
2602
when all Terry was doing was what he should have done, bring
2603
2604
facts indicating corruption to the attention of the Florida
2605
2606
authorities.
2607
2608
2609
2610
126. I consider their Grand Jury endeavor to be more than

Page 78 of 86
2611
2612
totally hopeless. The manner in which this prosecution of Terry
2613
2614
has proceeded thus far: Terry being arrested in court for failing
2615
2616
to appear in court because, when the case was called, instead of
2617
2618
answering with the commonly accepted response (indicating he
2619
2620
was appearing there under his "True Legal Name"), Terry instead
2621
2622
said that he was there to respond in regard to that matter (or
2623
2624
some similar Paytri-Idiot words), whereupon the judge ordered
2625
2626
Terry arrested, for failing to appear, causing Terry to remain in
2627
2628
jail for twenty-one days, until he was brought back before the
2629
2630
court and then released on his posting of a substantial bond.
2631
2632
2633
2634
127. Terry has characterized himself as (1) a defendant and (2)
2635
2636
is appearing and (3) is representing himself. Three strikes and
2637
2638
you are OUT!
2639
2640
2641
2642
128. Terrys friends are incensed at the Florida Judge for
2643
Page 79 of 86
2644
arresting Terry for failing to appear when Terry was in fact
2645
2646
physically present in the court. What his friends fail to
2647
2648
understand is the impossibility of the court interacting with Terry
2649
2650
unless Terry appeared in that court as an artificial persona,
2651
2652
acting under a True Legal Name.
2653
2654
129. I agree that the judge acted wrongly in having Terry
2655
2656
arrested and held in jail for 21 days. As Terry had not presented
2657
2658
himself properly under a TLN, the judge had no standing to have
2659
2660
Terry arrested and held in jail. It seems that this judge had not
2661
2662
been well schooled as most judges have, in how to handle a
2663
2664
Paytri-Idiot such as Terry. What the judge should have done is
2665
2666
have Terry thrown out of the courtroom as a trespasser.
2667
2668
130. To expect that the authorities of Florida are going to agree
2669
2670
to establish any manner of protocol allowing and recognizing
2671
2672
indictment authority to be exercised by Grand Juries formulated
2673
2674
Page 25 of 1
2675
2676
by those who claim to be of the People of Florida, could not be

Page 80 of 86
2677
2678
more unrealistic.
2679
2680
2681
2682
131. I strongly contend that the one and only way that any such
2683
2684
Grand Juries could be created in Florida, or anywhere, would be
2685
2686
by those concerned about the corruption who want to be able to
2687
2688
create Grand Juries outside of the corrupted government, where
2689
2690
such grand Juries will be required to be recognized by the
2691
2692
authorities, that these concerned People must strive to have an
2693
2694
initiative placed on the ballot, and voted upon by the citizens of
2695
2696
Florida and or other states.
2697
2698
///
2699
2700
///
2701
2702
132. I contend that the expected conviction of Terry, that the
2703
2704
manner in which the charges were brought, have enabled this
2705
2706
issue to be widely addressed by the media in Florida and
2707
2708
elsewhere in this country. I contend that those citizens of
2709
Page 81 of 86
2710
Florida, who have no inkling of what I have presented in this
2711
2712
instant essay, would be outraged at the way Terry has been
2713
2714
persecuted by the Florida authorities, and that such outrage could
2715
2716
be used to gain sufficient support for such an initiative to be
2717
2718
passed by the Florida electorate.
2719
2720
2721
2722
133. I think the weak point in the argument of those advocating
2723
2724
such a Grand Jury creation is in their insistence of the invocation
2725
2726
of the Common Law. There is no such thing as a determined
2727
2728
Common Law. The Common Law is unwritten. Its
2729
2730
"interpretation" is totally up to each individual man or woman,
2731
2732
formed and enforced in their local communities by their
2733
2734
agreement as to what should be tolerated or forbidden on a
2735
2736
moment by moment basis.
2737
2738
2739
2740
134. This is not necessarily bad, because the views of morality in
2741
2742
any given community are fairly well developed in each such

Page 82 of 86
2743
2744
community, however the moral views of what would be tolerated
2745
2746
in San Francisco, California and Key West Florida will be
2747
2748
diametrically opposed to what would be tolerated in Atlanta,
2749
2750
Georgia or Yellville, Arkansas.
2751
2752
2753
2754
Page 26 of 1
2755
2756
135. This divergence of what constitutes common law will be
2757
2758
used against those of Florida attempting to root out government
2759
2760
corruption, to root out what is considered corruption that would
2761
2762
not be tolerated in either San Francisco or Atlanta, but the
2763
2764
powers that be are not interested in where agreement might be
2765
2766
the norm, they will only be interested in emphasizing the aspects
2767
2768
of the common law that will offend the common voters.
2769
2770
2771
2772
136. Common law is supposed to be applied by every jury in
2773
2774
every court in this country, as it was in the beginning and as it
2775
Page 83 of 86
2776
was during the Lincoln's unconstitutional undeclared war of
2777
2778
aggression against the South. Where white people who were
2779
2780
charged with harboring escaped black slaves were exonerated by
2781
2782
white juries who refused to enforce the laws that had clearly been
2783
2784
violated by these white protectors of escaped black slaves.
2785
2786
137. The actions of these juries was clearly an invocation of the
2787
2788
common law, whether or not those populating such juries realized
2789
2790
it or not. Their intention was to render justice, based on the facts
2791
2792
presented, however that application of the common law has been
2793
2794
totally destroyed in this country.
2795
2796
138. Another issue - I have added the following paragraphs in
2797
2798
my Notice and Demand:
2799
2800
139. As paragraph 35. Let STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA and this
2801
2802
Honorable Court be hereby further advised, I, Donald Sandburg,
2803
2804
freely acknowledge that the charging entity, STATE OF NORTH
2805
2806
DAKOTA has a serious dilemma, as there is no possible way that
2807
2808
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA can present proof that it has properly

Page 84 of 86
2809
2810
gained any manner of jurisdiction over this Wrongly Accused, and
2811
2812
at the same time, that if STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA responds
2813
2814
with the information that it does purport to have, STATE OF
2815
2816
NORTH DAKOTA knows that I will eviscerate any such
2817
2818
presentation due to the self-evident fraudulent procurement
2819
2820
thereof by STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, thereby totally
2821
2822
embarrassing STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA.
2823
2824
140. As paragraph 36. Therefore, let it be hereby acknowledged
2825
2826
Page 27 of 1
2827
2828
by this Wrongly Accused, that as STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA is in
2829
2830
a situation that it cannot win and dares not lose, this Wrongly
2831
2832
Accused agrees that this case is not to be used as a precedent by
2833
2834
any other person challenging the Political or civil jurisdiction of
2835
2836
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA. That their case must stand or fall on
2837
2838
its own merits.
2839
2840
Cheers,
2841
Page 85 of 86
2842
2843
2844
I am Eric Williams, The Radical In The Twilight Zone
2845
Page 86 of 86

Challenge To State of Maine' S Political or Contractual Jurisdiction (Legal Form)

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Challenge To State of Maine' S Political or Contractual Jurisdiction (Legal Form)

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

1

DISTRICT COURT AND SUPERIOR COURT

UNIFIED CRIMINAL DOCKET IN FRANKLIN COUNTY

129 Main Street, Suite 1, Farmington, ME 04938

Executive and Judicial

on behalf of the above named Wrongly Accused.

(In Lieu of Motion)

OF CHALLENGE TO STATE OF MAINES POLITICAL OR CONTRACTUAL JURISDICTION

DEMAND THAT STATE OF MAINE PRESENT PROOF OF ITS JURISDICTION

STATE OF MAINES INHERENT FAILURE TO PRESENT SUCH PROOF SHALL CONSTITUTE

DISTRICT COURT AND SUPERIOR COURT

Executive and Judicial

to NOTICE (In Lieu of Motion) OF CHALLENGE TO STATE OF MAINE S POLITICAL OR

CONTRACTUAL JURISDICTION OVER THIS WRONGLY ACCUSED and DEMAND THAT

STATE OF MAINE PRESENT PROOF OF ITS JURISDICTION STATE OF MAINES INHERENT

Introduction Let STATE OF MAINE and this Honorable Court be advised;

MAINE over this Wrongly Accused.

Challenge 45 Case Citations re: JURISDICTION

MUT. L. ASSOC. v. McDONOUGH, 204 U. S. 8, 27 S. Ct. 236 (1907).

WILLIAMSON v. BERRY, 8 HOW. 945, 540 12 L. Ed. 1170, 1189 ( 1850 ).

v. U.S. 505 F 2d 1026.

[by the charging entity]." 100 S. Ct. 2502 (1980).

be decided." Maine v Thiboutot 100 S. Ct. 250.

20: Corpus Juris Sec. 1785.

Cavitt, 254 P.599

CHALLENGE TO STATE OF MAINE S POLITICAL OR CONTRACTUAL JURISDICTION

constitutional right, is an excess of jurisdiction." Wuest v. Wuest, 127 P2d 93 4, 937.

deprived of juris." Merritt v. Hunter, C.A. Kansas 170 F2d 739.

Inc., 909 F.2d 657, 661 (1st Cir. 1990)

(1983); Dragotoiu, 133 Idaho at 647, 991 P.2d at 379.

S.E.2d 756, 758 (1987)

is a nullity and may be vacated at any time." 261 Kan. at 862.

Supreme Court 1998.

summary judgment," Trinsey v. Pagliaro, D. C. Pa. 1964, 229 F. Supp. 647.

witness". (Trinsey v. Pagliaro D. C. Pa. 1964, 229 F. Supp. 647).

Federal local rule 7.1(h).

U.S. 126, 56 L. Ed. 693, 32 S. Ct.

(1974) Mr. Justice Douglas, dissenting.

Proceeding at all times under Threat, Duress and Coercion

c/o 248 Lane Road New Sharon, Maine

Dated: May ___, 2015

CHALLENGE TO STATE OF MAINE S POLITICAL OR CONTRACTUAL JURISDICTION

Hi Group Special Member,

5. Here is my disclaimer that you must agree to before

1. Please read my disclaimer here as you are bound by it.

6. By my acceptance of these three generic letters, I

no matter what might be written or how it might be

11. No Pay-Tri-Idiot text or word changes permitted other

Instructions for editing Generic Notice and Demand:

explained it in IRS letter #2, beginning at about paragraph

12. This explanation dove tails in with the United States

motions after serving my N&D, enabling the court to ignore

20. Also, read the instructions I entered above paragraph

18. You need to carefully read paragraph 21 of my N&D and

What are the Hazards of Using Notice and Demand?

Imaginations and wishful thinking. My Basis is the

Many of the words we use have many different

CHALLENGE TO STATE OF MAINE S POLITICAL OR CONTRACTUAL JURISDICTION

meanings depending on the other words they are

CHALLENGE TO STATE OF MAINE S POLITICAL OR CONTRACTUAL JURISDICTION

me to mend my ways, included this:

you want to promote something [Eric], promote

MEMORIZE the Federal Rules of Evidence and