Professional Documents
Culture Documents
In our criminal justice system, one kind of injustice, that victimizes only the poor, happens every day
whenever an accused, who has the right to post bail to attain liberty during the course of the trial of
his criminal case, is not able to enjoy such right because he cannot afford to post bail for his release.
This reality tramples upon the social justice mandate of our Constitution and has caused great
injustice to the poor, especially those who are wrongly accused of the crime for which they have
been charged and arrested.
There is a recent legislation that seeks to address this problem: Republic Act 10389 or the
Recognizance Act of 2012 (RA 10389 or the Act), which was signed into law by President
Benigno S. Aquino III on March 14, 2013, and which is intended to promote restorative justice amid
problems confronting the criminal justice system such as protracted trials, prolonged resolution of
cases, inability to post bail bond, and congestion in jails.
Right to Bail and to Be Released on Recognizance
The right to bail emanates from the constitutional right of an accused to be presumed innocent until
proven by an independent, competent, and unbiased court to be guilty beyond reasonable doubt.
However, for a person accused of a crime, who is poor and belongs to the marginalized and
depressed sector of society, this right more often than not is too costly, thereby making it practically
futile. The right to recognizance, under RA 10389, seeks to address this.
Recognizance, as an alternative to posting bail, is defined under the Act as: a mode of
securing the release of a person in custody or detention for the commission of an
offense who is unable to post bail due to abject poverty. The court where the case of
such person has been filed shall allow the release of the accused on recognizance as
provided herein, to the custody of a qualified member of the barangay, city or
municipality where the accused resides.
The term used is release on recognizance. The reputable person entrusted with the accuseds
custody will then have the burden of bringing the accused to court when his presence is required by
such court.
3. the accused had previously escaped from legal confinement, evaded sentence or has violated the
conditions of bail or release on recognizance without valid justification;
4. the accused had previously committed a crime while on probation, parole, or under conditional
pardon;
5. the accused is a flight risk;
6. there is a great risk that the accused may commit another crime during the pendency of the case;
or
7. the accused has a pending criminal case which has the same or higher penalty to the new crime
he/she is being accused of.
The court may also order the arrest of an accused released on recognizance (1) if he fails to appear
at the trial whenever required by the court; (2) if there is a manifestation under oath by any person,
which found meritorious by the court after a summary hearing and after giving the accused the
opportunity to be heard; (3) if the accused has been sued for the commission of another offense
involving moral turpitude and the mayor or public prosecutor recommends his arrest; or (4) if he
commits an act of harassment against private complainant, prosecutor or witnesses in the case
pending against him.
The Act took effect on April 6, 2013, fifteen days after its publication in the Official Gazette and two
national newspapers.
(Ricardo Ma. P.G. Ongkiko and Melissa Asuncion A. Ursua co-authored this post.)