Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Project Overview
Steve Richter, The Nature Conservancy
Reference
In-stream gages to
monitor flow, sediment,
phosphorus
Treatment
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Implementation
Partners: Producers, Dane County Land Conservation
Department, NRCS, UW-Extension
Practice funding: NRCS, The Nature Conservancy
Inventory
Baseline Inventories for erosion
and runoff P loss assessment
Interview farmers to find out
crops and field management
Soil sample fields (routine analysis
for crops)
Calculate soil loss and P Index in
SnapPlus
More than 90% of agricultural land in watershed inventoried
Implementation
Land conservation staff KEY
Hard Practices
Barnyard runoff,
Stream crossings,
Small water control
projects
Farmer Experience
Challenges of implementation
Short time-frame for sign-up for federal
cost-share
Two of ten farms in initial target group
reluctant to participate
Learning curve for all partners
Local agricultural consultants not brought
in as initial partners
Shifts in land operators
Verification of implementation timeconsuming (e.g. field checks for no-till
cost share)
37%
In the News!
Cattle Access
Upland Pastures
Photo: M Godfrey
WI P Index Basics
Field
Runoff
Erosion
P lb/acre year
Stream
Estimates Transport:
Erosion
Runoff
Estimates P concentrations in
eroding sediment and
dissolved in runoff based on
these Sources:
Soil P
Manure P
Fertilizer P
Reduce P sources:
Soil P
Manure
Fertilizer
Reduce Transport
Spring tillage
Winter manure
Commercial P fertilizer
No till
Same manure and
fertilizer
Reduce Source
Same tillage
No manure,
Minimal P fertilizer
No one-size-fits-all solutions
Acres
No-till/reduced
till/residue
management
Pasture systems
(stream crossings,
fencing, seeding)
P Index
Erosion
reduction reduction
(lb/yr)
(ton/yr)
1840
3300
2000
315
1100
100
Orig. Avg.
P Index
Dairy farm
Beef farm
Cash grain
6.5
4.1
3.4
P Reduction
$ per lb
5
7
19
Erosion
Reduction
$ per ton
8
30
32
Estimated P
delivery from all
agricultural
acres in
watershed was
reduced 12%
Phosphorus in lb/acre
Weather-caused variability in
annual loads obvious in treatment
watershed
Sediment in ton/acre
R. Carvin, USGS
Summary
WI P Index inventory and tracking allowed
project to:
Identify croplands and pastures with higher
P runoff contributions to stream
Identify alternative managements
Estimate runoff P reductions with changing
practices
Paired watershed monitoring showed that
changing practices reduced P loads
Targeting Conservation
Sediment Budgets and Sediment Fingerprinting
Stream Phosphorus Reductions
Linking upland/field delivery to downstream water
quality
Understanding sources, delivery, storage, timing,
and lag times
Decision-making concerning targeted conservation
practices for uplands and channels
Tools for understanding ecology-based stream
impairments and TMDLs
Adopted traditional sediment techniques for
phosphorus
Fields
Barnyards
Gullies
Channels
Soft sediment
In-situ suspended
sediment sampler
DNR biology
R
H
V=LxHxR
L = Length of eroding bank (m)
H = Height of eroding bank (m)
R = bank retreat rate (cm/yr)*
V = volume of eroded sediment (m^3/yr)
V=LxWxT
L = Length of soft sediment (m)
W = Width of soft sediment (m)
T = thickness (m)
V = volume of stored soft sediment (m^3)
Lateral Recession
Rate ft/yr
(cm/yr)
Category
Description
0.01-0.05
(0.3 - 1.5)
Slight
Some bare bank but active erosion not readily apparent. Some rills
but no vegetative overhang. No exposed tree roots.
0.06-0.2
(1.8 6.0)
Moderate
0.3-0.5
(7.0 15)
Severe
0.5+
(>15)
Very
severe
Bank is bare with rills and severe vegetative overhang. Many exposed
tree roots and some fallen trees and slumps or slips. Some changes in
cultural features such as fence corners missing and realignment of
roads or trails. Channel cross section becomes U-shaped as opposed to
V-shaped.
Bank is bare with gullies and severe vegetative overhang. Many
fallen trees, drains and culverts eroding out and changes in cultural
features as above. Massive slips or washouts common. Channel
cross section is U-shaped and stream course may be meandering.
EXPORT (GAGE)
0.14 tons/ac/y
FINE SEDIMENT
SAVINGS AND LOAN
1.2 tons/ac
(2006 -10 data, various sources)
Phosphorus in lb/acre
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Agriculture
In situ suspended
sediment samplers
photo: Curt Diehl
44
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
In situ suspended
sediment samplers
photo: Curt Diehl
45
Bank Erosion
Pre-Implementation Sediment Budget (2009)
Grazed/feeding areas
Barnyard/night pasture
Barnyard/Night Pasture
2009 Pre-implementation
2012 Post-implementation
P Savings from
channel = ~16 lb/yr
2009 Pre-implementation
2012 Post-implementation
Concentration
1400
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0
0
10
20
Drainage area (square miles)
30
Acknowledgments
Questions?
STUDY PARTNERS, ASSISTANCE, AND FUNDING