Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Contents
Page No.
Investment Arguments ............................................................................................... 5
Digitization - Will completely alter the dynamics of broadcasting industry... ................................... 5
Broadcasting industrys subscription revenues to grow at a CAGR of 26.2% from CY12-17E ........... 7
Zees domestic subscription revenues likely to clock CAGR of 20.9% over FY13-16E ....................... 7
How will Zee benefit from digitization in different scenarios? ......................................................... 8
DTH revenue growth to remain strong ............................................................................................. 9
Carriage fees set to reduce with implementation of digitization ...................................................... 9
ARPU set to increase with digitization ............................................................................................ 10
Long gestation period & considerable investments remain key entry barriers .............................. 12
Digitization - How is it shaping up? ................................................................................................. 13
Regional broadcasting - Zee gaining increased traction .................................................................. 16
Sports Business - subscription revenues under digitization to reduce sports losses going forward17
DMCL acquisition A tax bonanza .................................................................................................. 20
Advertising - TV remains one of the fastest growing mediums....................................................... 21
TV Ratings/Viewership share - Zee TV continues to strengthen its position................................... 23
Prabhudas Lilladher Pvt. Ltd. and/or its associates (the 'Firm') does and/or seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. As a result investors should be aware that
the Firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of the report. Investors should consider this report as only a single factor in making their investment decision.
Please refer to important disclosures and disclaimers at the end of the report
Company Report
BUY
Rs278
Rs330
18.7%
21,265
6,319
Trading data
Market Cap. (Rs bn)
Shares o/s (m)
3M Avg. Daily value (Rs m)
265.2
954.0
1147
Major shareholders
Promoters
Foreign
Domestic Inst.
Public & Other
43.08%
47.25%
4.05%
5.62%
Stock Performance
(%)
1M
Absolute
(1.3)
Relative
(4.3)
6M
15.8
8.7
% Diff.
3.7
1.9
Jan-14
Nov-13
Sep-13
Jul-13
May-13
Mar-13
(Rs)
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
Jan-13
Contd4
12M
24.8
17.5
Source: Bloomberg
2013
36,996
21.7
9,543
7,196
7.5
22.8
2.0
2014E
43,243
16.9
11,334
8,554
9.0
18.9
2.5
2015E
49,376
14.2
14,093
10,648
11.2
24.5
2.8
2016E
56,512
14.5
16,851
12,542
13.1
17.8
3.2
2013
25.8
19.6
24.9
7.0
27.2
36.9
6.8
0.7
2014E
26.2
20.4
26.1
5.9
22.7
31.0
5.9
0.9
2015E
28.5
22.2
28.5
5.1
17.9
24.9
5.2
1.0
2016E
29.8
22.8
29.8
4.4
14.7
21.1
4.5
1.2
Investment Arguments
Digitization - Will completely alter the dynamics of broadcasting
industry
The much-awaited digitization in the domestic broadcasting industry finally kicked
off in FY13. Transformation to the Digital Addressable System (DAS) for television
distribution has been the single largest development in the last decade in the cable
television industry. While digitization is widely being touted as a gamechanger for
the broadcasting industry, we highlight some of the key changes that digitization can
bring across.
Exhibit 1:
Implications
Transparency in subscriber
declaration
Increase in ARPU
Increase in newer/niche offerings
What it means
Under the analogue regime, Local Cable
Operators (LCOs) used to under-report the
number of subscribers leading to revenue
leakage in the system
Source: PL Research
All this is set to change with the implementation of digitization as eventually every
television having cable access in the country will become paid. Digitization will bring
about transparency in the entire system as LCOs will be forced to report every
subscriber. Hence, subscription revenues for MSOs and broadcasters will get a boost
through the implementation of digitization. In the TV distribution value chain,
broadcaster is the only entity which will benefit from the roll-out of digitization
without shelling out any additional cost.
Exhibit 2: How the revenue sharing mechanism will change post digitization?
Particulars
Pre digitization
Post 2016
100%
100%
65-70%
35-50%
ARPU of consumer
LCO
Distributor
5%
0-5%
MSO
15-20%
25-30%
Broadcaster
10-15%
30-35%
Exhibit 3:
CY08
CY09
CY10
CY11
CY12
CY13E
CY14E
CY15E
CY16E
CY17E
140
158
169
194
214
245
281
345
427
518
607
% YoY
14.8%
12.9%
7.0%
14.8%
10.3%
14.5%
14.7%
22.8%
23.8%
21.3%
17.2%
% of TV revenues
66.4%
65.8%
65.8%
65.3%
64.8%
66.2%
66.9%
68.7%
70.3%
71.4%
71.7%
71
82
88
103
116
125
139
157
180
207
240
% YoY
16.4%
15.5%
7.3%
17.0%
12.6%
7.8%
11.2%
12.9%
14.6%
15.0%
15.9%
% of TV revenues
33.6%
34.2%
34.2%
34.7%
35.2%
33.8%
33.1%
31.3%
29.7%
28.6%
28.3%
211
240
257
297
330
370
420
502
607
725
847
15.3%
13.7%
7.1%
15.6%
11.1%
12.1%
13.5%
19.5%
20.9%
19.4%
16.8%
Subscription rev
Advertisement rev
Total Revenues
% YoY
CAGR
'07-'12
11.8%
CAGR
'12-'17
19.9%
12.0%
13.9%
11.9%
18.0%
Subscription revenues
CY12
49
% YoY
Contribution to broadcasting industry
29.9%
Advertisement revenues
115
% YoY
Contribution to broadcasting industry
70.1%
164
% YoY
CY13E
CY14E
CY15E
CY16E
70
87
116
156
191
224
42.9%
24.3%
33.3%
34.5%
22.4%
17.3%
35.9%
38.5%
42.5%
46.4%
48.0%
48.3%
125
139
157
180
207
240
8.7%
11.2%
12.9%
14.6%
15.0%
15.9%
64.1%
61.5%
57.5%
53.6%
52.0%
51.7%
195
226
273
336
398
464
18.9%
15.9%
20.8%
23.1%
18.5%
16.6%
26.2%
13.9%
18.9%
Increase in ARPU
25,000
35.0%
30.0%
25.0%
20.0%
15.0%
10.0%
5.0%
0.0%
(Rs m)
20,000
15,000
10,000
FY16E
FY15E
FY14E
FY13
FY12
FY11
FY10
5,000
36.4%
38%
34.4%
35%
30.3%
32%
31.5%
32.7%
29%
26%
23.9%
23%
20%
FY11
FY12
FY13
FY14E
FY15E
FY16E
Scenario Analysis
Post Phase I
Post Phase II
Post Phase IV
BEAR CASE
No. of subscribers - m
10
32
67
87
50.0%
50.0%
50.0%
50.0%
16
34
44
19
19
19
19
14
14
14
14
Penetration of Zee
840
2,688
5,628
7,308
33.0%
33.0%
33.0%
33.0%
563
1,801
3,771
4,896
No. of shares
954
954
954
954
Incremental earnings/share - Rs
0.6
1.9
4.0
5.1
10
32
67
87
60.0%
60.0%
60.0%
60.0%
19
40
52
19
19
19
19
Tax @33%
BASE CASE
No. of subscribers - m
Penetration of Zee
14
14
14
14
Incremental Revenues - Rs m
1,008
3,226
6,754
8,770
Tax @33%
33.0%
33.0%
33.0%
33.0%
675
2,161
4,525
5,876
No. of shares
954
954
954
954
Incremental earnings/share - Rs
0.7
2.3
4.7
6.2
BULL CASE
No. of subscribers - m
10
32
67
87
70.0%
70.0%
70.0%
70.0%
22
47
61
19
19
19
19
14
14
14
14
Penetration of Zee
1,176
3,763
7,879
10,231
Tax @33%
33.0%
33.0%
33.0%
33.0%
788
2,521
5,279
6,855
No. of shares
954
954
954
954
Incremental earnings/share - Rs
0.8
2.6
5.5
7.2
Increasing DTH penetration has been a major growth driver for Zees subscription
revenues over the last few years. Transparent declaration of number of subscribers,
along with higher ARPU, has led to DTH revenue growth remaining strong. Success of
DTH clearly shows that the Indian consumer is willing to pay for quality services even
if it comes at a slightly higher cost. Our channel checks suggest that DTH has been
able to capture only 15-20% of the opportunity in Phase-I & II. However, Phase-III &
IV are likely to see DTH witness higher seeding due to cable-dark areas and lack of
bigger MSOs in these regions. As per FICCI - KPMG, DTH subscribers in India are likely
to grow at a CAGR of 15.4% over CY12-17E.
Exhibit 8: DTH subscribers in India
DTH subscribers in India
95.0
35%
85.0
30%
75.0
25%
(Rs m)
65.0
55.0
20%
45.0
15%
35.0
10%
25.0
5%
15.0
5.0
0%
CY10
CY11
CY12E
CY13E
CY14E
CY15E
CY16E
CY17E
Carriage fees has increased considerably over the last few years as limited
availability of bandwidth for analogue pushed broadcasters to shell out higher
amounts to MSOs to carry their channels. However, with the implementation of
digitization, we believe carriage fees will reduce as shift to digital removes the
bandwidth constraints and higher number of channels can now be carried. Further,
as subscription revenues increase for MSOs, it can lead to rationalization in carriage
fees by the MSOs as their reliance on carriage fee decreases.
Our recent channel checks point out that post the Phase-1 digitization, Mumbai and
Delhi have witnessed a 15-20% drop in carriage fees. In many cases where carriage
fee has not decreased, broadcasters are allowed to carry a larger number of
channels at same cost.
Increase in offerings, value-added services like Movie on Demand, Pay/ view etc.
CY12
CY13E
CY14E
CY15E
CY16E
CY17E
Cable
166
174
194
227
260
289
DTH
170
180
209
236
266
293
Currently, MSOs offer base packs at Rs170/month while premium packs are
being offered around Rs250/month. On the other hand, DTH base pack starts at
Rs200/month. Comparison of these packages clearly shows that MSOs packages
offer lower channels/services to consumers. MSOs have time and again indicated
that package prices are set to go up for the consumer in the future.
10
Exhibit 10: Package price comparison for DTH players & MSOs
No. of channels
Rate
Comments
Super Gold
296
196
305
254
350
303
Platinum
361
352
215
196
Super Gold
245+
250
Super World
260+
285
Super Platinum
280+
356
Titanium
285+
444
92
220
100
250
112
300
Metro
120
340
Grand Sports
144
430
Value Sports
158
220
191
300
Mega
210
350
Ultra
219
430
199
160
259
245
278
275
Intro
181
180
Family
239
225
Platinum
258
270
Popular
169
170
Grand
211
222
Premium
228
267
Digi Chrome
154
180
Digi Glitter
169
225
Digi Explode
211
295
DTH Players
Videocon D2H
DISH TV
Super Family
Airtel DTH
MSOs
Hathway Cable
DEN Networks
SITI CABLE
DIGICABLE
11
Post digitization, it would simply not be possible for MSOs to offer such low-priced
packages as MSOs balance sheets are already stretched. Current ARPU levels of
around Rs170-180 for a digital pay TV service is among the lowest in the world.
We acknowledge that near-term ARPUs may not increase significantly during the
implementation phase as both MSOs and DTH players target the same consumer.
Further, delay in deployment of channel packages for already digitized cable
consumers have led to muted improvement in ARPUs till now. However, as
digitization picks steam and deployment of packages happens, ARPUs would
automatically increase.
Sports subscription will drive ARPU higher
Sports broadcasting is another genre which would play a key role in driving ARPU
higher in the digitization era. Previously, under analogue, cricket was made available
to every subscriber as the LCO/MSO provided the relevant cricket channel (which
was broadcasting live cricket games). However, with digitization kicking off,
subscribers would have to buy sports/cricket packages as sports channels are
available as add-ons and not included in base packages. Cricket is among the few
genres where subscribers are ready to pay higher prices and can influence selection
of packages.
Sports channels command significantly
higher ARPU. In the post- digitization era,
consumers would have to subscribe to
sports packages since they are available as
add-ons and not included in base package
Videocon D2H
Dish TV
Tata SKY
Rs 5-20
Rs 15-25
NA
Rs10-35
Rs 25-45
Rs 10-30
Regional
Rs5-15
Rs5-10
Rs5-10
Kids
Rs 5-15
Rs 25-45
Rs 5-15
English
Rs 5-20
NA
Rs 5-10
Hindi Movies
Rs 5-20
NA
Rs 5-10
Hindi News
Rs 5-10
Rs 10-15
NA
Music
Rs 5-10
Rs 5-15
Rs 5-10
The nature of broadcasting business is such that it requires long gestation period,
considerable marketing investment as well as aggressive content to become a
meaningful force in a market dominated by 3-4 networks. These broadcasters are all
well-settled players in the market and for any new player to challenge them would
require huge investments in content. For example, Hindi GEC space has witnessed 67 new channel launches in the last decade, of which, only couple of the channels
have been successful.
12
Broadcaster
Status
Sahara
Zee Next
Zee
Imagine TV
Real
INX
Zee
NA Mar'00
5 Dec'07
Shut in Sep'08
10 Jan'08
Shut in May'12
5 Mar'09
10 Nov'07
Star
NA Dec'11
Colors
Viacom 18
NA July'08
13
Phase
Areas
Revised Timeline
Extended Timeline
Phase I
30-Jun-12
31-Oct-12
Q4FY14E
10
Phase II
31-Mar-13
31-Dec-13
Q2FY15E
22
Phase III
30-Sep-14
NA
FY16E
35
Phase IV
Rest of India
31-Dec-14
NA
FY17E
18-20
Phase I
Phase 1 which includes cities of Delhi, Mumbai, Kolkata & Chennai saw its original
timeline being extended from June 30, 2012 to October 31, 2012. While by the end
of December 2012, Delhi and Mumbai witnessed almost 90% of the subscribers
shifting to digital cable from analogue, Kolkata and Chennai lagged behind. By the
end of Mar 2013, Kolkata almost completed seeding of set-top boxes. However,
digitization is still a distant reality in Chennai.
Though seeding of set-top boxes has been completed in Delhi, Mumbai and Kolkata,
the mapping of subscribers and deployment of packages is still underway. Consumer
Application Form (CAF) is being collected. Unless the mapping of subscribers and
deployment of packages are completed, the true benefits of digitization may not be
completely visible. Currently, ARPU at the consumer level has not increased
materially and the customer mostly still continues to pay analogue rates.
Seeding of STB
Delhi
90-95%
Mumbai
90-95%
Kolkata
~90-95%
Chennai
~30-40%
CAF compliant
CAF filling almost
complete
CAF filling almost
complete
CAF filling almost
complete
NA
Packages deployment
Underway
Underway
Gross Billing
DEN - started Dec'13,
InCable- first week of Jan'14
DEN - started Dec'13,
InCable- Jan'14
Underway
NA
NA
Current ARPU
Rs 200-300; post DAS 10-15%
increase
Rs 200-300; post DAS 10-15%
increase
Rs 150-250; Unchanged ARPU;
gross billing will result in increase
Rs 125-225; Unchanged ARPU
Source: PL Research
Phase II
Given the fact that Phase I digitization implementation had witnessed manifold
challenges, all stakeholders were anticipating Phase II digitization to be delayed by at
least 6-9 months. Phase II involves significant investment required by MSOs towards
digital head-ends and other back-end infrastructure apart from set-top boxes costs.
Phase II is also expected to present new challenges in terms of managing logistics.
Our interactions with industry experts and channel checks suggests that, while
14
seeding of set-top boxes has been witnessed across cities, the mapping of
subscribers and deployment of packages will still take couple of months. Currently,
the filling of the CAF forms have picked up pace and certain cities are also on the
verge of a blackout. TRAI has extended the deadline of CAF submission in Phase-II
cities to Dec 31, 2013. ARPU in Phase-II cities has remained more-or-less unchanged
and we expect improvement only after the deployment of packages.
Exhibit 15: Phase-II digitization progress
Cities
Seeding of STB
Vishakhapatnam
Ahmedabad
Patna
70%-80%
~90%
~80-85%
Bangalore
~90%
Amritsar
~90%
Allahabad
~90%
Thane
90-95%
Pune
90-95%
CAF compliant
CAF filling underway ;
should take few weeks
CAF filling
almost complete
CAF filling underway ;
should take few weeks
CAF filling
almost complete
CAF filling
almost complete
CAF filling
almost complete
CAF filling
almost complete
CAF filling
almost complete
Packages deployment
Post collection of CAFs,
packages will be deployed
Gross Billing
Not yet started
Underway
Package deployment
started
Underway
Underway
Underway
Underway
Underway
Kanpur
70%-80%
Started
Jaipur
~90%
Started
Current ARPU
Rs 150-250;
Unchanged ARPU
Rs 150-250;
Unchanged ARPU
Rs 150-250;
Unchanged ARPU
Rs 200-250; minor
improvement seen till now
Rs 150-250; minor
improvement seen till now
Rs 150-250; minor
improvement seen till now
Rs 200-300; post
DAS 10-15% increase
Rs 150-250; post
DAS 10-15% increase
Rs 150-250;
Unchanged ARPU
Rs 150-250;
Unchanged ARPU
Source: PL Research
15
Regional channels are the second largest category in terms of viewership and
accounted for 26.6% of total TV viewership in CY12. In terms of language popularity,
Tamil and Telugu markets collectively accounted for ~50% of total regional
viewership, while Marathi and Bengali markets collectively accounted for ~29% of
total regional viewership in CY12. Within the regional broadcasting industry, regional
GEC is the most dominant genre accounting for 76-78% of viewership in Bengali and
Marathi markets, while in the Southern markets, regional GEC accounted for 65-70%
of viewership. With growing regional clamour, national broadcasters are increasingly
competing to strengthen their portfolio through launch of new channels - In CY12,
Zee and Star both launched their Bengali movie channels Zee Cinema Bangla and
Jalsha Movies. Star-owned Asianet Communications also launched Asianet Movies.
Exhibit 16: Viewership share of regional channels in FY13
Category
Broadcaster
Marathi GEC
Star Pravah
Star
40%
Zee Marathi
Zee
30%
ETV Marathi
TV18
21%
Star Jalsha
Star
47%
Zee Bangla
Zee
37%
ETV Bangla
TV18
10%
Gemini TV
Sun Network
36%
Maa TV
25%
ETV telugu
TV18
20%
Zee Telugu
Zee
19%
Udaya TV
Sun Network
39%
Suvarna
Star
25%
ETV Kannada
TV18
19%
Zee Kannada
Zee
18%
Sun TV
Sun Network
63%
Star Vijay
Star
12%
Zee Tamil
Zee
6%
Bangla GEC
Telugu GEC
Kannada GEC
Tamil GEC
16
Zee has created a strong foothold in the regional markets and its strong content
ranks amongst the top 2 players in Marathi and Bengali space. During FY13, Zee
Marathi improved its market share to 30% and firmly held onto its No.2 position. Zee
Bangla consistently ranks amongst the top 2 players in Bengali with 37% overall
market share and an 87% market share in non-fiction genre. In the Telugu market,
Zee Telugu has been gradually gaining traction demonstrated in market share
improving slowly to 19%. Though Zee Telugu ranks 4th currently, it is very close to
the 3rd player in this market in terms of viewership share. Zee Kannadas market
share stood at 18%. In the Tamil genre, Zee is a marginal player currently though it
has been gradually strengthening its position.
Details
Cricket
Year
Zimbabwe
2012-19
South Africa
2013-20
West Indies
2013-19
Sri Lanka
2009-13
Pakistan
2009-13
Brazilian league
2012-14
2012-15
2012-15
2012-15
2012-15
2012-15
Tennis
US Open
2013-16
Golf
European Tour
2013-18
Asian Tour
2013-18
FIH Championship
2011-14
Football
Hockey
17
Though Zees non-sports portfolio earns superior profit margins, investors have been
concerned about Zees investment in loss-making sports business. However, the
nature of sports business is such that it entails huge investments to acquire multiyear rights. Hence, Zee needs to invest in this business currently. Post digitization,
increase in subscription revenues would support the sports business and help to
reduce losses. Currently, most of the sports broadcasters make losses due to
aggressive acquisition of rights and primary dependence on advertising revenues.
However, post digitization ownership of sports properties would be a key
determinant for subscribers selection of packages. Sports channels would also help
to improve ARPU as sports packages are priced at a premium.
In FY15E, we expect sports losses to be
lower due to lower number of matches
involving India
Recent Rupee depreciation is likely to increase losses for the sports business as
revenues are denominated in Rupees, while sports rights are denominated in
Dollars. Typically, losses tend to increase when cricket matches involving India are
telecasted as the rights for India focussed matches are high-costs properties.
Though Zee was initially guiding for sports losses to be lower in FY14E (FY13 losses
were to the tune of Rs870m), it has now indicated that sports losses are likely to be
substantially higher than FY13. We model for sports EBITDA losses of Rs1.4bn/1.0bn
for FY14E/15E, respectively. For FY15E, sports losses are likely to be lower due to
lower number of cricket matches involving India.
Exhibit 18:
Sports revenues
Sports EBITDA
10,000
8,000
(Rs m)
6,000
4,000
2,000
(2,000)
FY10
FY11
FY12
FY13
FY14E
FY15E
FY16E
18
Over the last couple of years, the battle for acquiring satellite rights of new Hindi
movies has intensified, with broadcasters willing to shell out huge amounts to
procure exclusive rights for telecast. Even though Zee traditionally has been a lowcost content broadcaster (focus on maintaining margins), it has upped the ante by
joining the race for acquisition of satellite rights. We believe that despite the huge
costs involved in acquisition of movie telecast rights, it still makes good sense as new
Hindi movies generate substantial viewership and self-promotes the channel.
Further, ability of new movies to pull viewership helps the broadcasters overall
ratings during periods of low viewership. One such example is Sonys aggressive
acquisition of movie rights has helped the company to maintain overall ratings
despite weak primetime performance. Advertising revenues also gets a boost when
a new movie is telecasted on the channel. In FY14, Zee plans to spend Rs2-3bn on
acquisition of movie rights.
5,100
20%
4,900
15%
(Rs m)
4,700
10%
4,500
4,300
5%
4,100
0%
3,900
-5%
3,700
3,500
-10%
FY10
FY11
FY12
FY13
FY14E
FY15E
FY16E
19
Through this acquisition, Zee will benefit to the extent of Rs3.1bn of deferred tax
assets which will be utilized by Zee to reduce its tax payouts during FY15E/16E.
Further, Zee can utilise DMCLs license for launching a new channel where getting
new licenses has been a challenge recently. Zee can also capitalise on DMCLs
holding of reality show formats to boost its content. DMCL had revenues of Rs50m
and EBITDA of Rs20m in FY13. Against this acquisition, Zee will issue Rs22.3m worth
of 3year, 6% coupon carrying non-convertible preference to DMCL and also take
over Rs1bn of unsecured loans. We have not incorporated the tax benefits of DMCL.
FY14E
FY15E
FY16E
FY17E
FY18E
FY19E
FY20E
FY21E
FY22E
21.0
21.0
21.0
21.0
21.0
16.8
12.6
8.4
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
21.0
21.0
21.0
21.0
16.8
12.6
8.4
4.2
Interest due
Outflow
Discount rate
Discount factor
NPV
Cumulative NPV
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.0
0.8
0.5
0.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
5.5
5.2
5.0
4.7
4.5
12.0%
12.0%
12.0%
12.0%
12.0%
12.0%
12.0%
12.0%
12.0%
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.4
1.1
1.0
0.9
3.4
2.9
2.4
2.1
1.7
15.4
20
CY08
CY09
CY10
CY11
CY12
CY13E
CY14E
CY15E
CY16E
CY17E
82
88
103
116
125
139
157
180
207
240
% YoY
15.5%
7.3%
17.0%
12.6%
7.6%
11.1%
13.0%
15.0%
15.0%
16.0%
37.2%
38.5%
38.8%
38.7%
38.1%
38.3%
38.3%
38.3%
38.2%
38.1%
Print
% YoY
Contribution to mkt size
Radio
% YoY
Contribution to mkt size
OOH
% YoY
Contribution to mkt size
Digital Advertising
% YoY
Contribution to mkt size
Ad mkt size
% YoY
108
110
126
139
150
162
179
200
222
248
8.0%
2.2%
14.1%
10.6%
7.6%
8.0%
10.5%
11.7%
11.0%
11.7%
49.0%
48.3%
47.5%
46.5%
45.8%
44.7%
43.7%
42.5%
41.0%
39.4%
10
12
13
14
15
19
23
27
13.5%
-1.2%
20.5%
15.0%
10.4%
10.2%
10.0%
21.4%
21.4%
20.7%
3.8%
3.6%
3.8%
3.8%
3.9%
3.9%
3.8%
4.0%
4.2%
4.3%
16
14
17
18
18
19
21
23
25
27
15.0%
-14.9%
20.4%
7.9%
2.2%
6.0%
9.3%
9.0%
8.7%
9.2%
7.3%
6.0%
6.2%
5.9%
5.6%
5.3%
5.2%
4.9%
4.6%
4.3%
10
15
22
28
37
49
65
87
50.0%
33.3%
25.0%
54.0%
40.9%
30.4%
31.1%
31.8%
33.1%
33.9%
2.7%
3.5%
3.8%
5.1%
6.6%
7.8%
9.1%
10.4%
12.0%
13.8%
221
228
266
300
327
362
409
471
542
630
12.3%
3.6%
16.2%
13.0%
9.1%
10.6%
13.0%
15.0%
15.1%
16.3%
CAGR
'07-'12
11.9%
CAGR
'12-'17
14.0%
8.4%
10.6%
11.4%
16.6%
5.4%
8.4%
40.2%
32.1%
10.8%
14.0%
FMCG remains the largest advertiser on TV, accounting for ~33% of the total TV
advertising market in CY12. New product launches, ever increasing competition, race
to capture further market share are some of the key reasons which are likely to keep
FMCG advertising strong. Auto industry is also witnessing increasing ad spends as
companies launch new models and look to garner further market share.
We have modelled for Zees advertising revenues to grow at a CAGR of 14% over
FY13-16E driven by strong positioning of flagship Zee TV, launch of new channel
providing advertisers new options like &Pictures, increased traction in regional
broadcasting etc.
January 17, 2014
21
Advertisement Revenues
35,000
72%
62%
30,000
52%
(Rs m)
25,000
42%
20,000
32%
22%
15,000
12%
10,000
2%
5,000
-8%
FY10
FY11
FY12
FY13
FY14E
FY15E
FY16E
Language
TV Households
Penetration of
TV households
Tamil
16.4
92.7%
Penetration of
C&S
households
15.9
97.0%
Telugu
15.1
72.2%
14.8
98.0%
9.0
Bengali
9.5
46.8%
8.6
90.5%
7.0
Malayalam
7.6
93.8%
7.1
93.4%
6.6
Kannada
10.0
74.1%
9.9
99.0%
6.2
Marathi
16.8
67.5%
14.9
88.7%
4.1
Bhojpuri
16.6
29.4%
11.3
68.1%
1.0
Punjab
4.8
87.3%
4.3
89.6%
1.5
Oriya
4.2
42.0%
3.5
83.3%
0.8
Gujarati
8.1
63.8%
7.0
86.4%
0.5
C&S
Households
Ad mkt size
(Rs bn)
13.5
22
Star Plus
Colors
Zee TV
Sony
Sab TV
Life OK
26%
23%
20%
17%
14%
11%
Week 52
Week 51
Week 50
Week 49
Week 48
Week 47
Week 46
Week 45
Week 44
Week 43
Week 42
Week 41
Week 40
Week 39
Week 38
Week 37
Week 35
Week 36
8%
Zee TV
Sony
Sab TV
Life OK
23
Business Background
Zee Entertainment is one of Indias leading television, media and entertainment
companies. Zee is amongst the largest producers and aggregators of Hindi
programming in the world, with extensive library housing over 1 lakh hours of
television content. The company holds more than 3,000 movie titles and boasts of
holding one of the largest Hindi film library. Zee reaches out to over 670+ million
viewers across 169 countries. Started in 1992 with one channel, Zee now offers a
bouquet of 34 domestic channels and 29 international channels.
Key Personnel
Mr. Subhash Chandra, Chairman: Mr. Subhash Chandra, Chairman of Zee and
promoter of the Essel Group of Companies is amongst the leading lights of the global
media & entertainment industry. Mr. Chandra revolutionized the television industry
by launching the country's first satellite television channel, Zee TV in 1992 and later
the first private news channel, Zee News. For his contributions to the industry, Mr.
Chandra has been awarded the 2011 International Emmy Directorate Award. Mr.
Chandra became the first Indian ever to receive a Directorate Award recognizing
excellence in television programming outside the United States.
Punit Goenka, Managing Director and CEO: Mr. Punit Goenka, the eldest son of Mr.
Subhash Chandra, is the MD and Chief Executive Officer of Zee Entertainment. Punit
also holds an executive position of Managing Director of Zee News. In his tenure as a
MD & CEO, ZEE has achieved a global recognition and has attained many milestones
and bagged prestigious awards. His strategic guidance and approach has maintained
ZEE's ranking at the top most level in the M&E sector in the annual ET 500 Lists.
Atul Das, Chief Strategy Officer: Atul Das is the Chief Strategy Officer for Zee. Atul
joined ZEE in 1998 and in his current role as the Head of Corporate Strategy and
Business Development, his responsibilities include setting the company's strategic
direction, scout new opportunities for organic/in-organic growth and supporting
businesses in investments, strategic alliances and M&A. Atul also represents ZEE on
Corporate Boards including Media Pro Enterprise India Pvt. Ltd. and India Web Portal
Pvt. Ltd., a joint-venture between Zee and PMC, USA. Atul has held various positions
within Essel Group and has rich experience across content and distribution business
including Direct to Home (DTH), Cable Distribution and Broadcasting.
Hitesh Vakil, Chief Executive Officer - Service Excellence: Hitesh Vakil is the Chief
Executive Officer - Service Excellence. Mr. Vakil is responsible of setting up a stateof-the-art shared service centre, which will offer shared services across the group.
Prior to this, he was Chief Financial Officer of the Company for 18 years. He joined
the Company in 1995. Mr. Vakil is also a member of the Board of Directors in joint
venture Companies, namely, Zee Turner Ltd. and subsidiary Company, Taj India Ltd.
24
Risks
TRAIs regulation on capping ad minutes to 12/hour- negative for all
broadcasters
The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI)s recent regulation related to
limiting advertising minutes to 10+2 (10 minutes for commercial advertisements and
2 minutes for channels self-promotion) minutes per clock hour from Oct 1, 2013 is
likely to have a negative impact on all broadcasters. Limiting ad minutes per hour
from the previously prevalent daily average basis would result in decline of primetime ad inventory. Certain genres of channels used to run higher advertising
minutes, while GECs used to run ad minutes of 14-16/hr, movie/news
channels/regionals run advertising minutes of even more than 18-20 minutes/hour.
Hence, this regulation is likely to have a negative impact on all broadcasters.
Though our recent channel checks suggests that leading GECs (Star Plus, Zee TV,
Colors) have raised ad rates by 2030% to counter the impact of declining inventory,
still we believe the current regulation can have some near-term impact on
advertising revenues. As per Zee, post the implementation of this regulation,
onetwo months might be volatile due to adjustments in advertising inventory.
25
Financials
Revenues to grow at a CAGR of 15.2% over FY13-16E
We expect Zees revenues to grow at a CAGR of 15.2% over FY13-16E driven by
accelerated growth in domestic subscription stream of revenues. Domestic
subscription revenues are expected to increase by 20.9% CAGR over FY13-16E. On
the other hand, international revenues are likely to increase at a CAGR of 2.2%.
Collectively, subscription revenues (incl. domestic and international) are expected to
increase at a CAGR of 17.6%. We expect advertising revenues to increase at a CAGR
of 13.7% during the same period.
Exhibit 26: Revenues & revenue growth % YoY
50,000
30%
40,000
20%
30,000
FY16E
FY15E
FY14E
FY13
0%
FY12
10,000
FY11
20,000
10%
Advertisement Revenues
60,000
50,000
(Rs m)
60,000
FY10
(Rs m)
40,000
30,000
20,000
10,000
FY10
FY11
FY12
26
Margins (RHS)
Adjusted PAT
FY16E
FY15E
FY14E
FY13
FY12
FY11
FY10
3,000
9,000
6,000
3,000
FY16E
6,000
12,000
FY15E
9,000
30%
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
-5%
-10%
FY13
12,000
15,000
FY10
(Rs m)
15,000
FY12
35.0%
30.0%
25.0%
20.0%
15.0%
10.0%
5.0%
0.0%
FY11
18,000
(Rs m)
EBITDA
FY14E
RoE
RoCE
35.0%
28.5%
30.0%
24.9%
22.5%
25.0%
20.0%
26.1%
21.6%
17.6%
15.0%
29.8%
18.4%
18.0%
FY11
FY12
19.6%
20.4%
FY13
FY14E
22.2%
22.8%
FY15E
FY16E
14.6%
10.0%
FY10
27
12,000
8,000
6,186
6,000
3,420
26,779
24,000
8,714
(Rs m)
(Rs m)
10,000
4,000
29,000
10,572
20,981
19,000
14,000
4,154
16,594
13,233
11,283
9,000
2,000
4,000
FY12
FY13
FY14E
FY15E
FY16E
FY12
FY13
FY14E
FY15E
FY16E
28
Valuations
We believe Zee would continue to trade at premium valuations due to the inherent
opportunity laid forward for broadcasters by way of digitization. With strong
earnings growth, debt-free balance sheet, limited capex, robust FCFF generation,
improvement in return ratios Zee presents an attractive investment opportunity. We
value Zee at 29x FY15E earnings resulting into target price of Rs330 and recommend
BUY.
Exhibit 33: 1yr. forward PE
P/E (x)
Peak(x)
Avg(x)
Median(x)
26.4
30.0
25.0
20.0
15.0
10.0
5.0
0.0
300,000
Min(x)
21.0x
250,000
26.3
17.0x
200,000
17.4
13.0x
150,000
17.0
9.0x
100,000
4.0
5.0x
50,000
Mar-07
Aug-07
Dec-07
May-08
Sep-08
Feb-09
Jun-09
Nov-09
Mar-10
Aug-10
Dec-10
May-11
Sep-11
Feb-12
Jun-12
Oct-12
Mar-13
Jul-13
Dec-13
Mar-07
Aug-07
Dec-07
May-08
Sep-08
Feb-09
Jun-09
Nov-09
Mar-10
Aug-10
Dec-10
May-11
Sep-11
Feb-12
Jun-12
Oct-12
Mar-13
Jul-13
Dec-13
FY14E FY15E FY16E FY14E FY15E FY16E FY14E FY15E FY16E FY14E FY15E FY16E FY14E FY15E FY16E FY14E FY15E FY16E
43.2
49.4
56.5
16.9
14.2
14.5
11.3
14.1
16.9
26.2
28.5
29.8
8.6
10.6
12.5
18.9
24.5
17.8
22.8
26.2
30.0
18.6
14.8
14.4
15.3
17.8
21.0
66.9
68.1
70.1
7.8
9.2
10.7
9.8
18.6
15.8
EPS (Rs)
PE (x)
EV/EBITDA (x)
RoE (%)
RoCE (%)
FY14E
FY15E
FY16E
FY14E
FY15E
FY16E
FY14E
FY15E
FY16E
FY14E
FY15E
FY16E
FY14E
FY15E
FY16E
9.0
11.2
13.1
31.0
24.9
21.1
22.7
17.9
14.7
20.4
22.2
22.8
26.1
28.5
29.8
19.7
23.6
27.3
18.5
15.4
13.3
9.0
7.6
6.2
26.2
27.8
28.8
20.8
21.5
22.0
29
Annexure
Indias Media & Entertainment (M&E) industry - multiple drivers
likely to result in sustained growth of 15.2% CAGR over CY12-17E
At present, India is the 14th largest M&E
market in the world, while China is the
third largest market globally. Over the next
decade, it is expected that China will
surpass Japan and become the second
largest market worldwide next to the US
Domestic M&E industry is one of the fastest growing industries in the world with
market size estimated to be Rs820bn in CY12. Favourable demographics, increasing
media penetration, ongoing digitization, newer digital platforms and comparatively
lower spends on M&E are few of the reasons why we believe the domestic M&E
industry is poised to achieve newer heights. As per FICCI-KPMG, industry is projected
to grow at a healthy CAGR of 15.2% to reach Rs1,661bn by CY17E. During CY07-CY12,
the industry had grown at a CAGR of 9.8% from Rs514bn to Rs820bn.
Exhibit 37: M&E spend as a % of GDP
3.5%
3.1%
3.0%
2.9% 2.8%
2.4% 2.3%
2.5%
2.2%
2.0%
1.5%
1.5% 1.4%
1.2% 1.1%
1.0%
0.9%
0.5%
0.0%
CY09
CY10
CY11
CY12
CY13E
CY14E
CY15E
CY16E
CY17E
257
297
329
370
420
501
607
725
848
6.6%
15.6%
10.8%
12.5%
13.5%
19.4%
21.1%
19.4%
16.9%
43.8%
45.6%
45.2%
45.1%
45.8%
47.4%
49.1%
50.4%
51.0%
175
192
209
224
241
261
286
311
340
1.9%
9.8%
8.6%
7.3%
7.5%
8.5%
9.3%
9.0%
9.3%
29.8%
29.5%
28.7%
27.3%
26.3%
24.7%
23.1%
21.6%
20.5%
89
83
93
112
122
138
154
172
193
-14.5%
-6.7%
11.5%
21.0%
8.5%
13.4%
11.1%
11.8%
12.6%
15.2%
12.8%
12.8%
13.7%
13.3%
13.1%
12.4%
11.9%
11.6%
CAGR
'07-'12
11.9%
CAGR
'12-'17
18.0%
7.0%
8.7%
3.9%
11.5%
Contd31
30
CY09
CY10
CY11
CY12
CY13E
CY14E
CY15E
CY16E
CY17E
10
12
13
14
15
19
23
27
-1.2%
20.5%
15.0%
10.4%
10.2%
10.0%
21.4%
21.4%
20.7%
1.4%
1.5%
1.6%
1.5%
1.5%
1.5%
1.5%
1.6%
1.6%
11
12
13
15
18
23
% YoY
5.4%
10.3%
4.7%
17.8%
13.2%
9.2%
16.8%
19.6%
23.0%
1.3%
1.3%
1.2%
1.3%
1.3%
1.2%
1.2%
1.3%
1.4%
Radio
% YoY
Contribution to M&E mkt
Music
Out of Home
% YoY
Contribution to M&E mkt
Animation & Visual
% YoY
Contribution to M&E mkt
Gaming
% YoY
Contribution to M&E mkt
Digital Advertising
% YoY
Contribution to M&E mkt
Domestic M&E Industry
% YoY
14
17
18
18
19
21
23
25
27
-14.9%
20.4%
7.9%
2.2%
4.4%
11.1%
9.0%
8.7%
9.2%
2.3%
2.5%
2.4%
2.2%
2.1%
2.0%
1.9%
1.7%
1.6%
20
24
31
35
41
47
54
63
73
14.9%
17.9%
30.8%
13.9%
16.1%
14.1%
16.0%
16.2%
16.3%
3.4%
3.6%
4.3%
4.3%
4.5%
4.4%
4.4%
4.4%
4.4%
10
13
15
20
24
31
36
42
14.3%
25.0%
30.0%
17.7%
30.7%
19.0%
29.8%
17.2%
16.3%
1.4%
1.5%
1.8%
1.9%
2.2%
2.2%
2.5%
2.5%
2.5%
10
15
22
28
37
49
65
87
33.3%
25.0%
54.0%
40.9%
29.0%
32.5%
31.8%
33.1%
33.9%
1.4%
1.5%
2.1%
2.6%
3.1%
3.5%
4.0%
4.5%
5.2%
587
651
728
820
917
1,058
1,238
1,438
1,661
1.3%
10.9%
11.8%
12.6%
11.8%
15.4%
16.9%
16.2%
15.5%
CAGR
'07-'12
12.7%
CAGR
'12-'17
16.6%
8.7%
16.2%
5.4%
8.4%
20.3%
15.8%
30.8%
22.4%
40.2%
32.1%
9.8%
15.2%
31
TV
900
60%
800
50%
700
40%
600
500
30%
400
20%
300
10%
200
100
0%
CY07 CY08 CY09 CY10 CY11 CY12 CY13E CY14E CY15E CY16E CY17E
TV penetration levels remain one of the lowest in India. Of the 247m households in
India at the end of CY11, only 148m households own a TV set, implying TV
penetration level of only 60%. Compared to other emerging economies of Indonesia,
Brazil and China, the current level of penetration is well below these countries.
However, it is estimated that penetration levels would increase to ~64% by 2016E
though they will still be significantly below other countries. With increasing TV
penetration, we believe demand for niche content is likely to increase which would
drive growth for C&S, going forward.
32
350
300
90%
78%
80%
317
240
250
61%
60%
200
40%
150
174
154
146
142
Vietnam
97%
China
98%
China
Germany
Brazil
Indonesia
India
India
US
0%
Indonesia
100
20%
UK
100%
CY10
CY11
CY12E
CY13E
CY14E
CY15E
CY16E
239
247
255
262
270
277
284
141
148
155
162
169
175
181
58.9%
59.9%
60.8%
61.7%
62.5%
63.2%
63.9%
113
123
133
144
154
164
172
80.5%
82.8%
85.9%
89.0%
91.5%
93.4%
94.7%
33
2013
2014E
2015E
2016E
36,996
17,401
19,595
3,491
6,561
9,543
399
(1,375)
1,461
10,519
3,337
7,182
(33)
7,196
954.0
7.5
43,243
20,234
23,009
4,065
7,611
11,334
366
(1,800)
1,900
12,768
4,213
8,554
8,554
954.0
9.0
49,376
22,001
27,375
4,641
8,641
14,093
404
(2,086)
2,166
15,775
5,127
10,648
10,648
954.0
11.2
56,512
24,516
31,996
5,312
9,833
16,851
445
(2,313)
2,383
18,719
6,177
12,542
12,542
954.0
13.1
2013
2014E
2015E
2016E
3,873
446
(2,287)
2,032
3,274
5,316
4,154
4,159
6,935
(849)
(2,923)
3,162
5,316
8,478
6,186
6,186
9,485
(991)
(4,407)
4,087
8,478
12,565
8,714
8,714
11,376
(1,735)
(4,844)
4,798
12,565
17,363
10,572
10,572
2013
2014E
2015E
2016E
Revenue (%)
EBITDA (%)
PAT (%)
EPS (%)
21.7
29.0
22.2
22.8
16.9
18.8
18.9
18.9
14.2
24.3
24.5
24.5
14.5
19.6
17.8
17.8
25.8
19.5
24.9
19.6
26.2
19.8
26.1
20.4
28.5
21.6
28.5
22.2
29.8
22.2
29.8
22.8
(0.1)
173
(0.2)
169
(0.2)
160
(0.3)
155
36.9
6.8
27.2
7.0
31.0
5.9
22.7
5.9
24.9
5.2
17.9
5.1
21.1
4.5
14.7
4.4
31.7
13.9
3.2
57.8
33.0
14.9
2.8
72.3
32.5
13.7
3.0
81.8
33.0
12.7
3.1
84.3
2013
2014E
2015E
2016E
39,116
17
33
39,166
9,975
8,245
20,658
5,317
26,734
11,393
288
39,166
44,879
17
44,896
10,257
8,445
25,905
8,478
30,190
12,764
288
44,896
51,200
17
51,217
10,544
8,745
31,639
12,565
33,278
14,205
288
51,216
58,968
17
58,985
10,835
9,745
38,116
17,363
36,635
15,881
288
58,984
Q4FY13
Q1FY14
Net Revenue
EBITDA
% of revenue
Depr. & Amortization
Net Interest
Other Income
Profit before Tax
Total Tax
Profit after Tax
Adj. PAT
9,643
2,423
25.1
115
(510)
538
2,818
1,014
1,796
1,796
9,733
2,915
30.0
87
(700)
722
3,528
1,289
2,246
2,246
Q2FY14 Q3FY14E
11,013
3,105
28.2
91
(395)
429
3,409
1,166
2,243
2,243
11,032
2,736
24.8
91
(375)
400
3,020
997
2,023
2,023
2013
2014E
2015E
2016E
15.0
21.5
2.5
13.0
20.2
2.0
13.0
21.0
2.0
Profitability
EBITDA Margin (%)
PAT Margin (%)
RoCE (%)
RoE (%)
Balance Sheet
Net Debt : Equity
Net Wrkng Cap. (days)
Valuation
PER (x)
P / B (x)
EV / EBITDA (x)
EV / Sales (x)
Earnings Quality
Eff. Tax Rate
Other Inc / PBT
Eff. Depr. Rate (%)
FCFE / PAT
Source: Company Data, PL Research.
34
35
% of Total Coverage
60%
53.9%
50%
40%
30%
25.8%
18.8%
20%
10%
1.6%
0%
BUY
Accumulate
Reduce
Sell
Accumulate
Reduce
Sell
Trading Buy
Trading Sell
This document has been prepared by the Research Division of Prabhudas Lilladher Pvt. Ltd. Mumbai, India (PL) and is meant for use by the recipient only as
information and is not for circulation. This document is not to be reported or copied or made available to others without prior permission of PL. It should not be
considered or taken as an offer to sell or a solicitation to buy or sell any security.
The information contained in this report has been obtained from sources that are considered to be reliable. However, PL has not independently verified the accuracy
or completeness of the same. Neither PL nor any of its affiliates, its directors or its employees accept any responsibility of whatsoever nature for the information,
statements and opinion given, made available or expressed herein or for any omission therein.
Recipients of this report should be aware that past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance and value of investments can go down as well. The
suitability or otherwise of any investments will depend upon the recipient's particular circumstances and, in case of doubt, advice should be sought from an
independent expert/advisor.
Either PL or its affiliates or its directors or its employees or its representatives or its clients or their relatives may have position(s), make market, act as principal or
engage in transactions of securities of companies referred to in this report and they may have used the research material prior to publication.
We may from time to time solicit or perform investment banking or other services for any company mentioned in this document.
36