Professional Documents
Culture Documents
How Plants Cope with Water Stress in the Field. Photosynthesis and
Growth
M. M. CH AVES 1 , 2 , *, J. S . P E RE IRA 1 , J. MA R O C O 2 , 5 , M. L. R O D R I G U E S 1 , C . P . P . R IC A R D O 1 , 2 ,
R I O 1 , 3 , I. C A R V A L H O 1 , 3 , T . F A R IA 1 , 4 and C . P I N H E I R O 2
M. L. OSO
1Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade Te
cnica Lisboa, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349017 Lisboa, Portugal,
2Instituto de Tecnologia Qumica e Biolo
gica, Apartado 127, 2781901 Oeiras, Portugal, 3Universidade do Algarve,
Faro, Portugal, 4Laboratorio Qumico Central Rebelo da Silva, Lisboa, Portugal and
5Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada, Lisboa, Portugal
Received: 16 August 2001 Returned for revision: 4 December 2001 Accepted: 12 February 2002
Plants are often subjected to periods of soil and atmospheric water decit during their life cycle. The frequency
of such phenomena is likely to increase in the future even outside today's arid/semi-arid regions. Plant responses
to water scarcity are complex, involving deleterious and/or adaptive changes, and under eld conditions these
responses can be synergistically or antagonistically modied by the superimposition of other stresses. This complexity is illustrated using examples of woody and herbaceous species mostly from Mediterranean-type ecosystems, with strategies ranging from drought-avoidance, as in winter/spring annuals or in deep-rooted
perennials, to the stress resistance of sclerophylls. Differences among species that can be traced to different
capacities for water acquisition, rather than to differences in metabolism at a given water status, are described.
Changes in the root : shoot ratio or the temporary accumulation of reserves in the stem are accompanied by
alterations in nitrogen and carbon metabolism, the ne regulation of which is still largely unknown. At the leaf
level, the dissipation of excitation energy through processes other than photosynthetic C-metabolism is an
important defence mechanism under conditions of water stress and is accompanied by down-regulation of photochemistry and, in the longer term, of carbon metabolism.
2002 Annals of Botany Company
Key words: Carbon assimilation, high temperature stress, Lupinus, photosynthesis, Quercus ilex, Quercus suber,
stomatal functioning, Vitis vinifera, water-stress, xanthophyll cycle.
INTRODUCTION
Periods of soil and/or atmospheric water decit often occur
during a plant's life cycle even outside the arid/semi-arid
regions, as reported for temperate deciduous forests (Law
et al., 2000; Wilson et al., 2001) or tropical rainforests
(Grace, 1999). In the latter, for example, water limitation
may prove to be a critical constraint to primary productivity
under future scenarios of more arid climates due to global
environmental change (Fischer et al., 2001).
Plant responses to water scarcity are complex, involving
adaptive changes and/or deleterious effects. Under eld
conditions these responses can be synergistically or
antagonistically modied by the superimposition of other
stresses. Plant strategies to cope with drought normally
involve a mixture of stress avoidance and tolerance
`strategies' that vary with genotype. This complexity is
well illustrated in Mediterranean-type ecosystems where
plants with predominant drought-avoidance strategies (e.g.
deep-rooted perennials or winter/spring annuals), which die
when they run out of water, coexist with drought-tolerant
sclerophylls.
Early responses to water stress aid immediate survival,
whereas acclimation, calling on new metabolic and structural capabilities mediated by altered gene expression, helps
* For correspondence. Fax + 351 213635031, e-mail mchaves@isa.utl.pt
908
909
910
911
TA B L E 1. Proportion of the VAZ (violaxanthin + antheraxanthin + zeaxanthin) pool compounds per unit of total
chlorophyll in sun leaves of Quercus suber and Q. ilex ssp.
rotundifolia, in early July and September
Quercus suber
Quercus ilex
Early July
September
Early July
September
750 6 69
V+A+Z
[mmol mol(Chl)1]
132 6 20
646 6 73
104 6 16
latent heat exchange under drought. However, leaf temperature does not rise much above air temperature because
the small size of the leaves allows for increased heat
dissipation through convection/conduction. Even so, leaf
temperatures 48 C higher than air temperatures have been
reported for Q. ilex during the summer (Larcher, 2000).
A decline in photosynthesis was observed by the end of
the dry season (September in Portugal) as compared with
early summer (July), in both Q. ilex and Q. suber (Faria
et al., 1996, 1998). This decline was associated with a
decrease in quantum yield of photosystem II (PSII) (Fv/Fm)
that was most marked during the warmest part of the day
when carbon assimilation was limited by the decrease in
stomatal conductance, and which may be viewed as an
important protective mechanism under drought in these
evergreen trees. This down-regulation of photosynthesis
resulted from the thermal dissipation of excessive excitation
energy in the chloroplasts, as shown by the increase of nonphotochemical quenching (NPQ) in September compared
with July (Fig. 3). In the latter month, more than 6070 % of
the photon energy absorbed by the leaves at midday was
dissipated thermally. Martinez-Ferri et al. (2000) reported
similar values for various Mediterranean tree species. This
ability to dissipate energy is associated with an increase in
the concentration of de-epoxidized xanthophyll cycle
components, antheraxanthin (A) and zeaxanthin (Z), at the
expense of violaxanthin, occurring during the day, as
reported by Demmig-Adams and Adams (1996) and GarcaPlazaola et al. (1997).
In the case of Q. ilex and Q. suber, down-regulation of
photosynthesis was also associated with the increased
capacity of the xanthophyll cycle pool (Table 1) and the
accompanying decrease in leaf chlorophyll concentration
(Fig. 5), which was observed from July to September. A
smaller pool and reduced efciency of PSII open centres,
driven by lower protein and chlorophyll contents, was also
observed in rain-fed grapevines after a prolonged period of
drought (Maroco et al., 2002). However, no permanent
damage to PSII centres was observed under these conditions, as indicated by PSII quantum yield values of darkadapted leaves which remained close to the optimal value of
08. In grapevines, the lower light use efciency under
drought was accompanied by the down-regulation of C
metabolism, understood to be an adjustment of the
912
F I G . 8. Leaf area, stem and pod dry weight, and root length per unit soil
volume per plant in well-watered and water-stressed Lupinus albus L.
lines (lines 6, 34 and 43). The drought period of 15 d was imposed at the
end of owering. By the end of the drying period well-watered and
water-stressed plants exhibited ypd values around 01 MPa and
06 MPa, respectively. Each value represents the mean (6 s.e. except
root length) of four plants. (Adapted from Rodrigues et al., 1995.)
913
pod coats, roots and seeds (Fig. 9). At the end of the drying
cycle, d13C decreased signicantly in leaves, stems and
roots, whereas in pod coats and seeds d13C increased
signicantly. Moreover, the increase in d13C in pod coats
and seeds of water-stressed plants was higher than that in the
same organs of well-watered plants. At harvest, 60 d after
anthesis, the retention of 13C label was still high in seeds and
pod coats of water-stressed plants (with pod coats acting as
an intermediate compartment in relation to the seeds),
intermediate in stems and was not detectable in leaves and
roots.
The increased ability of lupins to divert photoassimilates
to pods when subjected to water decit conrms earlier data
by Withers and Forde (1979) showing that the sink capacity
of seeds and pods is stimulated by water stress. It is also
apparent that a large photosynthetic accumulation prior to
owering is an important factor for plant production and
survival during a drought event that does not disrupt the
owering process. Differences among genotypes in the
ability to store and utilize stem reserves, as well as in
photosynthetic capacity, are likely to be exploited in crop
breeding for arid and semi-arid regions.
In plants subjected to drought, biochemical changes in
stems and the processes regulating storage of reserves are
still not well understood. A recent study by Pinheiro et al.
(2001) showed that water decit in L. albus brings about
tissue-specic responses that are dependent on the intensity
of the stress. The stem (specically the stele) responds to
intensication of the stress with striking increases in the
concentration of sugars, N and S, the induction of
thraumatin-like-protein (TL) and increased activity of the
enzymes chitinase (ChT) and peroxidase. These proteins are
typically related to adverse conditions, including pathogen
attack (Riccardi et al., 1998; Tabaeizadeh, 1998). The
activity of invertase (INVA) increased under mild stress and
dramatically decreased with severe water decit. The
particular response of INVA may be related to the central
role played by this enzyme in the modulation of plant
responses to abiotic and biotic stresses (Kingston-Smith
et al., 1999; Roitsch, 1999).
It is recognized that sucrose and other sugars regulate the
expression of many genes involved in photosynthesis,
respiration, N and secondary metabolism, as well as defence
processes, thus integrating cellular responses to stress
(Koch, 1996; Jang and Sheen, 1997). The large alterations
TA B L E 2. Amount and activity of Rubisco per unit leaf area, proportion of the VAZ cycle compounds to total chlorophyll
and amount of chlorophyll a + b (Chl) per unit leaf area in well-watered and water-stressed Lupinus albus L. grown at
15/10 C and 25/20 C
15/10 C
Well-watered
Water-stressed
25/20 C
Well-watered
Water-stressed
Rubisco
(g m2)
VAZ
(mmol mol1 Chl)
Chlorophyll
(mmol m2)
191 6 014
205 6 024
1029 6 45
1039 6 61
1480 6 117
1238 6 58
1539
1632
5757 6 362
7885 6 822
118 6 032
115 6 009
858 6 46
797 6 49
1150 6 99
1001 6 72
1270
1496
3272 6 485
2850 6 536
914
Austin RB, Edrich JA, Ford MA, Blackwell RD. 1977. The fate of the
dry matter, carbohydrates and 14C [carbon isotope] lost from the
leaves and stems of wheat during grain lling. Annals of Botany 41:
13091321.
Biehler K, Fock H. 1996. Evidence for the contribution of the Mehler
peroxidase reaction in dissipating excess electrons in droughtstressed wheat. Plant Physiology 112: 265272.
Bohnert HJ, Sheveleva E. 1998. Plant stress adaptations making
metabolism move. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 1: 267274.
Chaves MM. 1991. Effects of water decits on carbon assimilation.
Journal of Experimental Botany 42: 116.
Chaves MM, Osorio ML, Osorio J, Pereira JS. 1992. Non-stomatal
limitation of photosynthesis under high temperature and water
decits in Lupinus albus. Photosynthetica 27: 521528.
Cornic G. 2000. Drought stress inhibits photosynthesis by decreasing
stomatal aperture not by affecting ATP synthesis. Trends in Plant
Sciences 5: 187188.
Cornic G, Fresneau C. 2002. Photosynthetic carbon reduction and carbon
oxidation cycles are the main electron sinks for photosystem II
activity during a mild drought. Annals of Botany 89: 887894.
Cornic G, Massacci A. 1996. Leaf photosynthesis under drought stress.
In: Baker NR, ed. Photosynthesis and the environment. New York:
Kluwer Academic Publishers, 347366.
Correia MJ, Chaves MMC, Pereira JS. 1990. Afternoon depression in
photosynthesis in grapevine leavesevidence for a high light stress
effect. Journal of Experimental Botany 41: 417426.
Correia MJ, Rodrigues ML, Osorio ML, Chaves MM. 1999. Effects of
growth temperature on the response of lupin stomata to drought and
abscisic acid. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 26: 549559.
Correia MJ, Pereira JS, Chaves MM, Rodrigues ML, Pacheco CA.
1995. ABA xylem concentration determines maximum daily leaf
conductance of eld-grown Vitis vinifera L. plants. Plant Cell and
Environment 18: 511521.
Cowan IR. 1981. Regulation of water use in relation to carbon gain in
higher plants. In: Lange OL, Nobel PS, Osmond CB, Ziegler H, eds.
Physiological plant ecology II. Water relations and carbon
assimilation. Encyclopaedia of plant physiology Vol. 12B. Berlin:
Springer, 589614.
David M, Coelho D, Barrote I, Correia MJ. 1998. Leaf age effects on
photosynthetic activity and sugar accumulation in droughted and
rewatered Lupinus albus plants. Australian Journal of Plant
Physiology 25: 299306.
Davies WJ, Zhang J. 1991. Root signals and the regulation of growth and
development of plants in drying soil. Annual Review of Plant
Physiology 42: 5576.
Demmig-Adams B, Adams WW III. 1996. The role of xanthophyll cycle
carotenoids in the protection of photosynthesis. Trends in Plant
Science 1: 2126.
Downton WJS, Loveys BR, Grant WJR. 1988. Non-uniform stomatal
closure induced by water stress causes putative non-stomatal
inhibition of photosynthesis. New Phytologist 110: 503509.
Faria T, Garca-Plazaola JI, Abada A, Cerasoli S, Pereira JS, Chaves
MM. 1996. Diurnal changes in photoprotective mechanisms in
leaves of cork oak (Quercus suber L.) during summer. Tree
Physiology 16: 115123.
Faria T, Silverio D, Breia E, Cabral R, Abada A, Abada J, Pereira
JS, Chaves MM. 1998. Differences in the response of carbon
assimilation to summer stress (water decits, high light and
temperature) in four Mediterranean tree species. Physiologia
Plantarum 102: 419428.
Fischer G, Shah M, van Velthuizen H, Nachtergaele FO. 2001. Global
agro-ecological assessment for agriculture in the 21st century.
Laxenburg, Austria: IIASA and FAO.
Foyer CH, Descourvieres P, Kunert KJ. 1994. Protection against oxygen
915
916
signal in the droughted plant: the fate of the hormone on its way from
root to shoot. Journal of Experimental Botany 52: 19911998.
Schulze E-D. 1986. Carbon dioxide and water vapour exchange in
response to drought in the atmosphere and in the soil. Annual Review
of Plant Physiology 37: 247274.
Schurr U, Schulze ED. 1995. The concentration of xylem sap constituents
in root exudate and in sap from intact, transpiring castor bean plants
(Ricinus communis L.). Plant Cell and Environment 18: 409420.
Schurr U, Gollan T, Schulze ED. 1992. Stomatal response to drying soil
in relation to changes in the xylem sap composition of Helianthus
annuus. II. Stomatal sensitivity to abscisic acid imported from the
xylem sap. Plant Cell and Environment 15: 561567.
Smirnoff N. 1998. Plant resistance to environmental stress. Current
Opinion in Biotechnology 9: 214219.
Socias X, Correia MJ, Chaves MM, Medrano H. 1997. The role of
abscisic acid and water relations in drought responses of
subterranean clover. Journal of Experimental Botany 48: 12811288.
Spollen WG, LeNoble ME, Samuels TD, Bernstein N, Sharp RE. 2000.
Abscisic acid accumulation maintains maize primary root elongation
at low water potentials by restricting ethylene production. Plant
Physiology 122: 967976.
Stoll M, Loveys B, Dry P. 2000. Hormonal changes induced by partial
rootzone drying of irrigated grapevine. Journal of Experimental
Botany 51: 16271634.
Tabaeizadeh Z. 1998. Drought-induced responses in plant cells.
International Review of Cytology 182: 193247.
Tardieu F, Zhang J, Gowing DJG. 1993. Stomatal control by both
(ABA) in the xylem sap and leaf water status: a test model for
droughted or ABA-fed eld-grown maize. Plant Cell and
Environment 16: 413420.
Tardieu F, Katerji N, Bethenod J, Zhang J, Davies WJ. 1991. Maize
stomatal conductance in the eld: its relationship with soil and plant
water potentials, mechanical constraints and ABA concentration in
the xylem sap. Plant Cell and Environment 14: 121126.
Tenhunen JD, Pearcy RW, Lange OL. 1987. Diurnal variations in leaf