PHILOSOPHY?

WHAT

IS

the

By

Author.

Same

Poetry?

What

Essay.

An

is

Whitman

\Vai,t

An

With

Essay.

from

Selection

The

Writings.

his

Love

Silence

Poems.

of

[^Second

The

Love:

Triumph
of

Edition.

Poems.

WHAT

IS

PHILOSOPHY

BY

HOLMES

EDMOND

JOHN
LONDON

LANE:

THE
iff NEW

HEAD

BODLEY
YORK.

MDCCCCV

Richard

"

Son,

Folkard

W.C.
Devonjhirc

London,
Stre"t,

IS
WHAT

PHILOSOPHY?

PHILOSOPHY?

IS

WHAT

I.

Philosophy

defining

the

and

niverse.

side

and

truth

meaning

What

is
is

what

is

be

said

conceptions

reality,
to

Are

least

and

in

mediate

we

deep
The

what

between
in

possession

as

objective
this

to

is

but

the

as

side

subjective
what

being

answer

But

very

definable,

idea

one

me

truth

as

The

another.

is

the

truth

question.

audacious

word

by

ulti7nate

carry

corresponding

the

for

not

the

perhaps

knowledge

of

reality

the

of

range

wide

is

this

all words

of

search

will

defined

I have

until

far

this

answer

provisionally,

as

definition

This

will

and

tentatively

question,

trtith.

Philosophy

is

What

of

knowledge
sense

can

these

two

of

truth
B

when

certain,

when

absolute

confidence

is truth
of the

is

the

of

subjectAre

the

knows

so

science

mathematician

the

which

things

If this

able
it is incontest-

then

mathematical

of

matter

"

what

But

order.

highest

very

with

thing

so

truth

mathematical

that

is

This

by truth,

mean

wc

"

and

accurate,

of

say

can

we

clear,

is

knowledge

our

what

Philosophy?

is

What

accurately, and

clearly, so

by experience
we

the

are

intense

most

our

as

we

may

attitude

things

which

perfectly
Here,

the
of

are

then,
is of

in

the

on

go

the

emotion
the

wholly
to

Pure
very

real

the

us

and

much
inas-

objects

of

unemotional,

conclude

things

if

reality,

in

mathematician
all

and

most

awake

towards
is

the

once

with

that

that

exalted

perhaps

at

contact

things

study

be

experience,

conclude

and

mathematical

of

mean

we

perhaps

may

things

proof

the

and

product

feelinor

if

Now,

things?

certainly,real

so

the

Mathematics,

that

the

knows
least
our

highest order,

so

real.
ledge
know-

but

the

is

What

things

that

minimum

known

are

of

the

in

is

all

of

in

in

the

these
are

to

the

us

less

becomes
but

accurate,

they generate

the

may

be

At

last

reality.
confines

(in the

of

scientific
but

concrete

these

life,and

from

which

the

tion,
religiousemo-

less

the

things

which

become
if

the

of

as

proofs

to

approach

in which
the

and

feelings that

seem

of

round
sur-

certain

real,

accepted
we

that

things

more

of

region
sense

and

themselves

and

more

vividness

and

from

pass

the

reality

from

of

and

things

the

proportionately
strength

we

to

the

of

knowledge

our

kind

spiritualphenomena

more

the

and

the

nature,

objects of poetic

the

their

As

phenomena

complex

in

of

respect

material

matical
mathe-

accuracy

of mathematics

of

phenomena
to

lowest

objective counterpart.

the abstractions

very

truth

of

of

respect

certainty,the lowest
of its

the

the

words,

forms

and

degree

highest

other

In

have

to

seem

reality.

truth

highest

Philosophy?

knowledge

word)

is

we

seek
B

"

existent,
non-

to

know

in

lowest

the

kind

in

certainty, the highest

of its

But

what

what

is

one

of

of

try

to

separate
for

us

that

to

real, and

the

"

it ranges

have

we

truth

truth

inmost

generally,it
discover

the

ourselves

as

do

of

"

separate

may
truth

counter-

the

other,
the

"

absolute

be

said

about

fully as
ourselves

At

truth

exact

of things

counterpart

between

is the
At

is of

poles.

the

which

side

reality.

of

truth

infinitelydistant

poles

is the

Speaking
we

reality

Perhaps

that

data

perfect knowledge.

the

which

and

these

thinors

these

rather

or

opposite

have

and

objective

is least

knowable

from

infer

two

part

The

real is least knowable.

most

kinds,

about

of the

subjective side

The

is most

may

two

respect

is truth?

then

knowledge.

we

accuracy

in

objective counterpart.

What
of

of

forms

of

respect

"

be

to

highest

the

but

degree

in

lowest

truth, the

all

it is, of

region,

that

in

is

If truth

real.

supremely

are

-found

Philosophy?

is

What

we

truth

reality.

that

when

things, we

it is

possible

provision-

What

ally
the

and

Philosophy?

hypothetically,
of

objects

that

is

towards

from

really

not

experience,

our

attitude

our

if

5
"

the

with

them

result

is cold,

emotional,
un-

impersonal, impartial,disinterested
whereas,

when

things, we
is
our

try

we

identify ourselves
for

possible

experience,

attitude

towards

with

the

them

is

personal, partial (with

partiality that

feel

we

we

take

in
the

expound
the

function

of

the

truth

express
function

of

Where
Let
In

Science
which

confidence,

of

our

of

the

ourselves)
interest

things

is

rested
intethat

discover

To

things

of

emotional,

the

Science.

it

as

and

obviously

To

realize

is

obviously

and
the

Poetry.
then

us

about

that

something

of

of

objects

warm,

ourselves).
truth

the

result

for

(with something

truth

closely

as

with

do

to

us

the

discover

to

first

does

Philosophy

distinguish
arrive

we

enables
with

at

us

it from

certainty,
to

say

imperturbable

in ?

come

with
peace

Science.
the

tainty
cer-

perfect
of mind,

"

of

certainty

our

have

who

Philosophy

In

have.

have

Men
of

and

concerned

they

nothing.

Were

do

Philosophy
minds

primer

of their

they
The

outsider
of

mysteries

and

The

principle

no

affirm
need

be

to

anarchy

are

made

the

hands

axiom

or

have

They
in

initiated

in

order

its

of intestine

to

leading

of
up

which

incontestably
be

not

Philosophy

din

place

to

every

doctors

single point.

catechism

novices,

can

disorder

of

out

have

to

seem

mistry,
in Che-

from
the

are

exactly

cases

answer

But

not

on

or

same

chemist.

results

question

ninety-nine

the

receive

professional

no

in

kind.

thousands

for

yet achieved

ask

I to

within

of this

tangible

as

we

as

get

certainty

as

have

I should

hundred

far

so

by all

matter

never

we

its

of

proofs

the

philosophizing

been

years,

their

of

distance

measurable

sources

it is shared

fullyinto

as

gone

the

of

one

feeling that

the

validity is

and

of the

One

this is so."

that

I know

Philosophy?

is

What

into
see

true.

the
that

teristics.
charac-

strife is almost

the

only

into

the

What

is

sound

that

chaos

dawn.

the

pretend

conflict.

new

which

the

changes

from

enouoh
is

century

too

for

of

hearts

meaningless
that

Assumptions
solid
to-morrow

basis

to

of
as

the

controversy
hollow

those

and

of

of

will
unsound.

of

be

one

tated
agitrivial

seem

to

on

another.
and

thinkers

which
of

minds

to-day

seem

tive
destruc-

wrangle,

combatants

the

they

as

arena

forefathers

our

ignored

scene

and

The

for

in

platform

meet

the

perplexed

to

far

so

very

age.

narrow

that

Problems
the

to

begun

or

is the

turn

schools

age

of

mutually

the

Nay,

different

wide

was

in

age

less
end-

flourish

that

systems,

scientific, are

each

and

or

be

to

of

history

yet

anathematized

Rival

next.

the

not

thought

of

either

are

age

has

order

Systems

one

in

which

on

The

history

revolutions,

and

wars

camp

divided

be

stand

it

is the

Philosophy

of

its

house

shall

how

against itself,

civil

If

from

escapes

world.

outer

history

Philosophy?

to-day.

provide

rejected
All

is in

Nothing

is

Chillingworth

said

flux.

applies

witli

There

are

"'

the

age

that

I admit

changes

progressive
these

for

surface

may

becomes
cools
of

opinion
To

which
truth.

accepted

its unsolved

but

has

of

it

And

as

what

gains

both

as

characteristics
is

molten
none

of

even

speak

Science

solidifies,the

truth

age."

or

the
what
is

is

bulous,
ne-

ally
gradu-

inward

in size

solid

nebulous

molten

hard

space)

even

less

as

sphere

glide through
be

molten, and
and

such

But

which

of

of

take

granted.

yet
centre

to

those

(unlike
whose

is

of

points,its controversies,

teaching.

authoritative

of another
has

sent
con-

Church

the

age,

too

merely

not

against

age

Science

its doubtful

problems,

one

Church

the

against

other

against

against themselves,

of another

of fathers

its

of

councils

popes,

fathers

some

fathers

same

Philosophy

to

against

Rome

of

Church

force

popes

What

certain.

or

the

of

of fathers

consent

one

fixed

tenfold

against councils,
fathers,

Philosophy?

is

What

and

core

den-

What
The

sity.

sphere

hand, nebulous
to

the

individual

theories

is

with

is

which

secret

proof

The

the

with
the

mental

harmless

and

which

pugnacity
has

is

there

atmosphere

no

why

Pax

angry
that

the

In

doubt

derland
bormuch

regions

fullyestablished

perpetual

and

maintain

the

in

but

of inviolable

reason

is

calm

being

is flat.

there

Science

Science

The

earth

the

of

mental

of

not

who

theo-

storm-signal,

always

dream

lunatics

corroded

oditmt

agitation,

would

of

the

is

bity
acer-

philosophicum

always

certitude

one

of
heat

is

anger

surface

than

their

opinions

really

odiimi

digious
pro-

the

their

are

virulent

but

maintain

doubt.

of

No

and

minds

Perfect

cold.

themselves

their

and

repose.

have

undeniable

they

scarcely less

logictim;

philosophers
in

indeed

that

with

other

the

on

surface, is incandescent

the

at

confidence

shows

Philosophy,

of

centre.

very

That

Philosophy?

is

over

its authority,

Romana,

an

calm.
Science

is

able

to

arrive

certainty

at

the

and

work

is

this

object
that

being

is

of
in

the

To

it studies.

mathematical

long

of

probably

futile

which

bodily

Science

senses

equally developed (within

limits)in
which

use

less

all

certain

healthy

easilybe corrected,

of

the

concerted
senses

I say

individual

action).

alike,

It

operated

stands

with

or

this, I
senses

data

by the

persons,

which

(When

me

are

undefinable

operate

can

the

which

therefore

them.

if the

and

sane

that

faculties

perceptive

"

trudes
ob-

digression ; but,

furnished

are

of

things

involve

be said

deals

of

foundations

would

speaking generally,it may

with

the

and
the

examine

result

the

personality

mind

certitude

and

the

separation,

complete,

cloud

no

itself between
that

its

hypothetical separation,

and

from

the

to

of

sphere

the

is that

tainty
cer-

able

is

it

why

which

from

it starts

reason

in

one

provisional
subject

is that

certainty

from

start

Philosophy?

is

What

lo

rences
diffe-

in all who

thinking

am

than
to

and

reason

differentlyin

of

their

that
different

if

persons,

they conveyed

self

into

every

that

the

of

act

would

begin

which

of

would

things

with
It

which

universal

is the
which

the

sure,

and

the

so

solid

and

strong.

certainty

common,

shows
of the

in

that

word);

and

the

looked

be
of

all and

it is natural

Science

of

it builds

universality and

point

by

mind.

of

which

with

perceptive faculty
shared

dition
con-

tion
sense-percep-

foundations

course,

different

somewhat
that

of

may,

calm,

and

serenity

to

between

connexion

The

mosphere
at-

discerned,

are

"

materials

so

the

and

clear

element

makes

ject
ob-

and

always incompatible

fatal

and

certainty

is

result

electrical,

and

cloudy

become
of

things

perfectly

being

enter

the

with

down,

break

to

would

"

subject

between

through
instead

self

perception,

distinction

something

minds,

individual

the

of

"

ii

ferent
slightly dif-

even

different

to

messages
of

Philosophy?

is

What

The

view.

is

"

naturalness

and
in

fullest
of

fact

constant

perpetual

(in the

from

at

all,"

sense

percep-

de

is

facuhy

tive

facto

and

do

Nature,

that

reason

Appeal.

avaipHiV

while

armed,

Nature

fairly

claim

High

Commissioner

petty

to

and

in

be

the

that

for

higher

Court

and

must

no

though

be

full authority
this

of

were

and

he

may

Plenipotentiary
in

Humanity

we

and

take

be
or

the

the

certainty,

is

there

would

alone,

of

ourselves

sometimes

and

explore.

to

may

therefore

certitude
one

the

remind

to

'rrdvv

ov

delicate

his

virtue

of

specialistsis

of

universalityand

that

which

iriaTiv

is content

view

fail

not

potential, and
in

he

the

"

rrjv

of

between

universality may

even

is

conducts

whichever

connexion

cases

clearly defined,

loneliest

which

domain

But

we

of

investigations,with

recondite
of

he

is

that

ruling

The

ravrriv

The

(pel.

-maioTepa

there

perceive

to

been

irreversible,

and

decisive

ness.
of its trustworthi-

jure)
nature

it has

(sufficient

guarantee

perceive.

must

once

plain

de

as

it is my

What
I

sufficient

well

as

Philosophy?

is

What

12

that

purely

might

be

legitimate

almost

alone,

world.

the

against

latent
call

us

brought,

at

the

the

of the

as

those

would

able

to

they

and

use

simply
could

the

no

sense

narrower

clear

but

and

These
in

for the

they

the

senses,

cloud
of

of

the

calm

arrive

clairvoyant
all

rest

who

were

of mankind

revealed

would
who

those

provisional
would

ation
separ-

be

plete,
com-

personality (in
word)

at

ably
immeasur-

for

object

from

with

incontestable

as

Therefore

exist.

of

senses,

deal

might

and

that

rity
matu-

reason,

of these

faculties

alike

and

things

subject

and

real

deeper.

them,

such

use

that

senses,

operate

the
not

of

bodily

and

have

development

data

reasoning

as

senses,

men

physical science,

of

larger
senses

some

conceivable

the

quite
ties
facul-

might bring, to

rate

with

truths

scientific

clairvoyant

"

higher

scientist's

data

us

quite

it is

perceptive

are

which

"

some

dealing

reason,

of

any

it is

perhaps

or

as

them

or

and

there

all

in

13

example,

For

that

conceivable

let

Philosophy?

is

What

would

atmosphere

the

disturb

through

which

And

thought.

feeling

of

him,

as

with

the

he

which

truths

ordinary

and
them

heard

who

he

but

would

he

or

you

blind

the

would
for

not

if

be

to

seem

probably

would

the

to

and

dream

more

for

dream

The

taught

to

than

madness

being
seeing

not

what

he

of

being
the

with

Irritate those

of

possessing

of

would

worse

of

verge

he

as

mind.

might discover,

knowing

and

saw

serenity of

in

fellow-men

his

with

no

physicist,certitude

would

men,

fooHshness,

conclusions

his

its counterpart

find

its

both

certain

rightlyfeel

and

facts

his

of

actualized

had

things exactly

saw

would

them,

saw

objects

all who

that

senses

the

tor,
clairvoyant investiga-

our

so

sure

higher

their

perceived

mind

the

Philosophy?

is

What

14

angry
what

knew,

than

angry

with

use

of

their

eyes.
in

As

nor

that
the

the

Philosophy
serenity,
sphere

of

we

there
may

its work

(provisional)distinction

is

neither

tainty
cer-

fairly conclude
is

one

between

in

which

subject

is

What
and

breaks

object
and

perhaps

Philosophy

emotional

different

through

electrical

be

itself

cannot

are

of

of
go

mind

alike

into

in

Philosophy

if

domain
Science

an

of

Science,

had

official

Science,

to

are

to

Men
Science

question

we

not

as

of

vision

clouds

creed.

presently

functions

This

philosophy
is

no

warn

sophy.
Philo-

talk
and

pure

philosophy

the

off

of

sometimes

official

while,
Mean-

also

must

we

the

such, has

will

serenity

Philosophy

of Science
an

and

fully.

more

warn

usurp

the

with

charged

impossible.

this

istent
ex-

atmosphere

individuality,

clearness

make

as

different

"

which

be

actually

the

seen

heavily

clouds

in

that

and

convey

minds,

things

needs

must

and

different

which

may

differentlydeveloped

persons

to

messages

we

matters

though

are

men,

pletely
com-

great

emotion,

senses,

all

in

the

exercises

without

less

this

for

that

15

or

more

reason

as

contemplated

in

down

conjecture

which

our

Philosophy?

if

as

even

delusion.
and

no

If

creed.

wc

habitually

we

are,

we

is
of

as

(as

we

us,

bodily

at

or

surveyed.

yet

is

Art,

artist,

the

opened
this

explored region
either

just begun

to

wholly
be

the

word)

lies

is
to

world
or

the

revealed

by

us

been

fully
limits

which
has

our

part,

advancing

unknown

explored.

works

existence,

up

for

merchant.

plane only

ever

such,

as

Commerce,

fraction, has
the

what

such,

as

which

plane

small

Beyond

of

what

philosophy

or

understand

Of

senses.

the

for

of

rate

any

perhaps only

of this

Science,

philosophy

the

What
on

But

is

the

reacts

determines

particular plane

physical plane,
to

of

such, for the

Science
on

than

scientist

as

connection

are

responsible

philosophy

the

we

think.

and

more

the

doubt

no

what

and

believe
no

do

it, not

essential.

not

in

philosophical

and

study

always accidental,

is

in
The

men.

as

scientific

between

interested

are

interested

are

but

of science,

bias

science

of

men

philosophy, they
men

Philosophy?

is

What

as

only

Potentiallythis

What
unknown

island

new

of its

this

it should

off
and

frontiers

of which
and

the

above

certainty,stretches

the

(I

am

using the

in

sense) ;

certainty
of

and

permissible,and
though

not

in this

Even

might

the
be

regions

shores,
But

undefinable),

course,

of

Universe

in

the

and

widest

larger world,
in the

necessarily

Science,

potentialities

of the

rest

Philosophy

of

its

its

as

intruders.

development,

possession,

surface

right that

flagon

its very

is unattainable

mental

our

its

infinite

its

of

freest

land

certainties

word

discovers

physical plane (the

of

are,

to

it is but

possible
the

above

and

beyond

all

not

the

on

unexplored

plant

above

beyond

beyond

continent
of work,

regard

warn

Science

new

sphere

own

that

and

17

Science,

to

Whenever

or

it should
own,

belonos

world

Philosophy.

Philosophy?

is

where

stage

present

speculation

is in

Is

possession,

sole

or

field

of

in

manent
per-

thought.

clairvoyant scientist, though

his lot

in which

to

explore

of

some

Philosophy

is

now

the

It

very

working,
c

would
of

be

not

his

Philosophy?

is

What

Science

be

would

labours

incomparably larger,loftier, and

that

anything
Science,

that

teaching

would

they

the

transferred

be

further

Science

will

physical

to

that,

it advances,

as

be

able

it, abandoning

through

which

it

may

will

sphere

of

it is

at

safely

be

work.

Science,
it, the

great

The
the
ideas

of

great
that

of

nature.

the

from
;

will

free

and

retire

thought
to

that

range.
sophy
Philo-

appropriate

own

great

his

that, with

of

predicted

of

solved

existence

present

its

in

human

fields

lack

never

blems
pro-

domain

Philosophy

before

But

the

advance

higher planes

the

Philosopny

to

of

to

still

being

to

development

but

thoughts

conceivable

It is indeed

Science.

of

act

belong

to

cease

would

and

the

in

but

than

solution

their

find

philosophers might

"

of

the

exercise

present

at

of

Many

Philosophy.

not

Science

"

deeper

dream

can

we

results

The

Philosopher.

ideas

ideas
emerge

that

that

derlie
un-

govern

from

its

is

What

Philosophy?

teaching, all belong,

but

It is

Philosophy.

to

all

knowledge

all

proof

implies
the

implies

definition

there

for

which

shall

with

the

sphere

to

that

show

infinite
that

in

one

Science

without

and

sense,

is

but

of

sophy
philoand

this,

I say
of

terpene
in-

defining
in

order

Science, though
in

others, and
those

overpass
its

and

only

is limited

cannot

privileges and

limits
tages,
advan-

eventually losing its identity. That

a

land

debatable

Philosophy

authorities

it.

that,

room

Science,

Philosophy,

may

ing
environ-

for

"

intention

sphere

it

is

all
cess,
suc-

It follows

overarch

the

that

an

there

that

that

form

underlie

foregoing
and

there

of

that

possible by

immediate

any

say

Philosophy,

it and
not

to

unknowable

the

is Science,

is need

truism

failure.

of

there

undefinable

take, is always made

wherever

Science

whatever

achievement,

atmosphere

to

unprovable

the

implies

not

ideas,

as

19

"

dispute

land
for

between
in

Science

which

mastery"

the

two

is undeniac

"

bly

true

has

each
a

its
in

sphere

is

right to

last

himself

separate

thouii^ht,tries

The

Thinker
the

from

dispassionately,in
get

he

that

form

may

theories

frame

truth

on

the

sort

them

and

hand,

his

being

sympathy

which

some

things, gives

them,

measure,

him

in

tries
one

theirs.
enables
to

order

them

or

shall

be
The

true.

know

to

with

The

the

them,

native
imagi-

him, in

become

insight into

his

may

in

of

unconditionally

other

he

which

of things by becoming

by merging

that

order

about

of

to

coldly, impersonally,

conceptions

about

intrinsicallyand
Poet,

truth

the

know

to

the

tries

objects

them

study

to

is, in

Philosophy

of

aim

scientific.

resort,

from

distinguish Philosophy

The

Poetry.

other.

off the
next

us

it has

which

from

and

own,

warn

Let

fully,a sphere which

clearlyand

its

wholly

of work,

characteristics

its essential

which

that

fact

the

alter

not

appropriate sphere

own

exhibited

are

does

this

but

Philosophy?

is

What

20

their

one

vital

some

with
and

What
essential

comes

last

at

to

through

until

inner

mission
able

say,

with

moment,

what

he

true

for

has

felt.

his

those
In

things
and

the

truth

of

account

knows

who
other

valid

which

far

is

in

the

With

men

is

tell

you

ing
imagin-

true

that

his

for

it is

feel

attitude

which

all

only

what

abstract

accept

sing of, and

can

to

is

for

he
wards
to-

highest degree

things, truth

whether

he

only

from

things

words,

truth,

it is his

if

one,

able

are

the

persons

perfectly well

emotional.
about

which

But

inward

admitted,

things
these

appeal

his

are

identity, I

they really are."

that

men,

their

share

into

things

flows
over-

words

song,

been

time

impassioned

they

To

I have
the

shared

having

the

interpret.
"

to

of his

magic

truth, of
to

to

last

at

the

emotion

his

extent

some

the

insight reacts

into

whom

to

21

sympathy,

accord

own

experiences,

his

his kindled

Those

able

as

his

when

its

speech.

the

and

intensifies

of

are

Philosophy?

properties;

and

upon

is

sonal
per-

truth,

is intrinsically
it

or

not,

he

does

not

Philosophy?

is

What

22

himself

concern

slightest

the

in

degree.

that

in

he

tries,

the

differs

from

truth

the

knowable,
let

Or
tries

Scientist

the

tries

all about

the

the

Thinker

The

"

of

Poet

things
the

all about

truth

inmost

word.

the

the

ances
appear-

tries

know

to

essence)

(or inmost

things.
Acrain,
he

in that

objects

of

the

differs

Thinker

tries
his

impersonally

to

and
the

from

mind

and

the

the
matter

differs

from

the

himself

separate

thought

inevitably

put

thus

to

not

are

of

truth

know

which

sense

matter

inmost

to

thinqrs

of

of

the

put

know

to

scientific

he

tries

he

that

in

to

whereas

things

about

in the

us

them

Scientist

the

things, but

know

about

Poet

the

from

differs
to

not

truth

know

know

then

Thinker

The

and

to

deal

Poet

the

from
with

them

disinterestedly;whereas
Scientist

in

obtrudes

itself

objects
more

of his

that

his

ality
person-

between

thought.

concisely :
"

in

he

his

Or,
Science

to

Philosophy?

is

What

personality is nothing
is

everything- ;

Poetry personality

in

become

striving,consciously striving,to

ever

is

personality

Philosophy

in

23

impersonal.
Here
differential
the

Thinker

and

too

and

does

for

rather

them

his

thought

his

personality, because

or

self, because

true

being

inner

truth

The

as

the

external
to

to

there

be)

externalize

for

to

the

validityof

his

of

the
to

the

"

the

his

soul.

inmost

he

himself,

Science,

physical science,

(if such

life of

of

breath

the

are

his

constitute

that, in conceiving

relinquishes it
to

they

and

is

they

of

objects

transfigure

and

interpenetrate

him

between
the

because

and

personality

his

itself

obtrude

must

high

too

are

is that

him,

in which

things

himself

exercises

deep

chief, perhaps

The

the

why

final,reason

really

is, I think,

Philosophy.

in

the

what

to

come

we

the

verse
Uni-

necessarily

physical plane

superphysical planes

superphysical sciences
Universe

the distinction

is

to

between

postulate
subject

things

all existent

world

explore,

you

the

which

he

seeks

compelled
"

from

has

no

himself.

that
himself
is

and

And

choice

to

"first-rate

domain

return

the
he
the

to

for

is

his

to

Universe

trying (in
great

perhaps

(also in perfect good

making

that

explore it, not

solve
and

Science;

really external

while

perplex him,

of

is

but

faith) to

invade

to

fairly say

re-discover
so,

to

may

to

me

to

separate

world

it is for

mind,

"),he

If the

"

trying

to

potential

or

its

find

trying

(for Science

intruder

an

perfect good

he

in

being rightly expelled

starting point
in

is

actual

"

Philosophy,
to

Thus

realities

Thinker

the

domain

and
as

the

from

himself

always

in

impersonal,

become

to

faculties

such

of

will

materials.

appropriate

the

and

finds

Science

that

data

it is in the

and

tive
percep-

material

the

cognize

we

that

analogous

least

at

or

which

with

those

imply

to

cognizable by

are

akin

faculties

it is

words,

in other

object;

and

Philosophy?

is

What

24

blems
pro-

ing
flatter-

faith) that

metaphysical

disco-

What

veries"

(to

thinker

he

from

his

it

is

the

secrets

the

really

engaged
and

of

25

its

in

inner

of

words

grotesque

lacked

soul

own

the

Philosophy?

quote

who

humour),
with

is

saving
in

communing

striving
life.

of

grace

to

wrest

II.

Let

from
illustration

and

knowledge

are

It

will

with

oxygen,
the

soul

of

chemist

the

dear

subtle,

penetrative,

kind

knowledge

of

this

of
in

plenty,
the

contrast

has

or

being.

support

if I

is

resort,

mere

mathematician

triangle,

last

ready,

suffice

kind

of

poles

stinctive
in-

ing
know-

of

"

the

in

which,

latter

the

groping,

ledge
know-

blind

and

apprehension

conscious

clear

the

of

does

so

antipodal

the

between

range

ideals,

poetic

the

and

scientific

truth

As

poles

antipodal

the

between

ranges

to

way

our

Philosophy.

of

fountain-head

the

make

to

try

now

us

of

the
of

and

in

conception

of

knowledge

that

properties

of

properties
I

friend.

sympathetic,
to

hand.

one's

that

intimate

belongs

Examples

to

the

knowledge

tinguishabl
dis-

scarcely

have

of
of

Close,
the

region

latter
which

What

is

faintlyilluminated

is but

That

proved
my

by

large
is

implicit
small

gives
buried

of

self

calculations

as

apply

such

been

being

lated
formu-

explain

cannot

to

the

the

relative

them

to

that

correctly

towards

act

But

that

insight

values

solution

made.

me,

This

my

of various

calculations

perplex

love

elaborate

"

the

my

enables
and

profound

to

bystander,

way.

character,

make

case,

such

and

his

to

and

problems

concrete

of

explain

of action,

possible courses
when

can

such

to

only

being informally presented

into

me

that

of

friend

my

fact

it admits

and

in

That

of

less

in such

friend

love

the

by

consciousness.

my

delicate

most

blind, instinctive, and

measure

even

the

all

of

complicated

most

is
find

to

me

practicalproblems.

proved

myself, still

have

all

fraction
or

why,

the

sciousness.
con-

knowledge

it enables

that

27

light of

real

is

correctly

difficult of

it is in

my

fact

solve

to

mazes,

to

the

the

by

it

through

way

and

Philosophy?

which,
of
I find

the
to

example

intermediate

state,

that

idea

the
what

profonde,

vie

the

of

reallythink,
believe

what

profess

to

not

believe,

of

late

may

fairly claim

of

each

it.

individual

our

on

The
man

has

we

and

we

won

years
to

have

idea

is

native,
illumi-

guard against

personality
"

we

what

The

thought.

highest degree suggestive

misinterpreting
"

not

has

be

not

think, that

we

say

ill the

must

self,

what

think

we

itself in human

we

life,

really are,

we

rooted

but

of

range

buried

"

and

aspect,

subliminal

what

we

range

one

really believe,

we

adherents

many

what

every

ness
of conscious-

but

the

of

rance.
igno-

all, the

the

of

be, that

to

seem

we

are

we

have

general

the
idea

The

nature.

we

is

of

many,

among

blank

poles

unconsciousness

and

dfiddia,

and

after

the

between

knowledge

human

what

For,

expect.

to

reason

one

aocfjia and

is

this

And

diate
interme-

many

perfect knowledge

between

an

suggests,

rather

or

between

states,

of

Diotima

is. as

there

that

shows

Philosophy?

is

What

28

been

of

man

likened

What

to

iceberg, which

an

in

which

it

of

it is

part

submerged

man's

being,

consciousness,

psychology

larger
This

that
life of

the

is

licrht. in

our

of the

the

surely

may

gradual

as

at

mise
sur-

the

on

approach

latitudes,

us.

of
the

dayclose

night.

summer

To

crude

deliver

to

been

ever

as

northern

that

consciousness

has

indeterminable

light of

conception

one

that

iceberg

full

to

designed

of

dawn

is and

man

the

analogy,

from

Reasoning

back

go

tinuous
con-

darkness

an

the

to

The

say

like

which

self

To

exposed,

to

from

sub-conscious

this

general conception

perhaps, accept
there

The

sea

rule,

in the

sunshine,
is

as

are,

immersed

or

the

glitteringin

may,

the

invisible.

spasmodic.

than

life is either

mere

the

above
far

by

and

Nature

of
rather

and

high

floats, though

movements

of

rises

29

is, I think, misleadingly dualistic.

simile

of

Philosophy?

is

are

first is that

as

certain

unconscious

(which

working

obvious

we

thesis)
hypo-

corollaries.

apprehension

is

What

30
in

prior
at

time

That

it.

thinks

he
reason

become

can

the

"

less

not

be

must

all these

which

truths
life

woven

hold

good

than

of

the

that

before

spun

self-evident

are

individual

the

of

one

tion
intui-

that

inference

for

way

experience

of

be

can

the

prepare

yarn

before

exist

must

gence
intelli-

of

ahead

of its presence

aware

must

it

knowledge

that

before

field

the

is in

works

genius

that

instinct

that

of

perceives before

feels, and

acts,

man

is

advance

in

working

moment

and

knowledge

conscious

to

given

any

Philosophy?

is

life

collective

of

Humanity.
The

second
the

of

corollary
first.

sub-conscious) side
ahead

of

one's

indeed

other

words

am

the

and
ever

ever

when

say

it is also
are

dealing
to

expressing

(or

working

ever

progress

nearer

tension
ex-

unconscious
is

one

obvious

an

consciousness,

movements)

things.

of

growth

realities, and

As

is

the

with

the
same

that conscious

less
(ungrade
retro-

higher
truth

idea
appre-

of
in

is

What
hension

of

Philosophy?

truth

truth.

fact

is

Thus

Consciously

to

unconsciously

noble

action

cleave

to

higher

than

than

the

the

impulse

third

of

with

imply

that

the

higher

idea

is

higher

than

the

true

self
of

works

at

life

true

is

man's

for

of

being,

the

moment

those

which

consciousness
man

hidden

Nature's

that

say

given

any

one's

to

than

more

To

realities than

higher

with
and

is

principle is higher

second.

self is

that

side

conversant

lives

the

themselves

present

and
law

the

corollary is scarcely

sub-conscious

dealing

do

grasp

But

The

The

to

ciple.
prin-

and

on

unconsciously

fact.

is

action.

to

restatement

the

to

the

apply

and

spiritual idea.

law.

judgment

determine

to

judgment.

The
a

is

apprehend

to

isolated

apprehend

to

and

higher

apprehend

to

an

pass

Consciously
a

of

consciously

unconsciously

(or

unconscious

implies

sub-conscious) apprehension
wider

31

is buried

self; that
the
inner

most

is

side

that

the
is

mysteries,
part

in

the

32

What

darkness

of

naming

are

of the
them
find

natural

them

trying

now

I
I

to

So

far

the

sole

the

fruits of the

I may
function

to

and
But

than

in

centre

and

have

if

so

to

are

interpret
which

idea

perience
ex-

rated
gene-

they

must

we

the

conception
which

it

am

and

seemed

who

life

to

follow

organize
intuition

the
have

consciousness
this

and

or

enable

consciousness.

that

suggest

of consciousness
buried

lary
corol-

"

will

"

reason

have

officials

meaning

that

fourth

rehabilitate

to

conqueror)

orenius.

formulate.

me

instinct

of

scarcely call

can

could

alone

"

light

with

collective

the

it is clear

and

to

on

pass

race

myself

spread

"

explanation,

the

by

widely

so

experience

persistent, that

port
sup-

that

conceptions

and

words

these

content

In

inspiratio7tand

words,

beliefs

The

I will

thesis

two

life.

unconscious

the

this

of

Philosophy?

is

is

to

(likethe
in the

garner
istrative
admin-

wake

provinces

of
which

gradually
has

higher

quered.
con-

deeper

function.

is

What
that

have

said

truth

implies

but
"

that

say

of

the

to

further

self.
"

that

of man's

what

has

the

on

And

as

He

such.
in

does

know

not

may

some

the

fact

has
secret

mean

of

so

fact

is

nature

on

with

is

who

man

sciously
con-

already, though
with
to

the

is its

fact
self,
him-

ask

of his mind,

What

every

towards

on

press

already begun

unconscious

dissatisfied

the

the

stimulus

human

it,dissatisfied

recess

The
of

aware

of

be
to

truth

sion
apprehen-

operates

to

"

correct

possible ?

part of the

which

word

truth, prepares

become

and

apprehends
he

of the

equally

it

tendency

won

unattained.

be

wider

the

being

been

it does

doubt

possesses

tendency

plane

No

unconscious

has
one

it is

master

makes

one

effort

For

of

not

and

higher

knowledge

apprehension

apprehension
for

way

that

fact

very

it

for it and

way

precise meaning

conscious

the

prepares

of

truth.

Would

implies"?

33

apprehension

unconscious

is the

what

to

conscious

wider

and

higher

Philosophy?

"What

place
D

and

feel

its way

which

the

gropinglx',to

is

when

too

idea

emotional
the

of his

possible
slow
of

for

and

by

has

no

transmuted

thoughts.

These

consciousness,
self into

ever

by

by
fresh

and

justify

these

into

life in which

cognizance,
their

into
turn

suggest

stimulating
activity,may

the

by

process

consciousness

examples

it is

themselves,

spontaneous

ideas, ready when

trol
con-

draw-

reserves

it may

shape
a

the
it to

causes

an

heart,

his

it under

draw

sub-conscious
to

of

ruled

these
to

or

explained.

aware

its hidden

near

them

it is

long

he

"

he

which

be

bringing

reason),

degrees

emotional
to

of

and

his

to

region

has

(that through

supports

which

which

consciousness,

far

in from

and

law

the

"

phenomenon

isolated

becomes

man

act

very

of his

itself

exemplify

it

towards

through

and

grounded

So

in

in

fact

wider

duced
pro-

already beginning, blindly

is

mind

His

have

causes

does

laws

What

it ?

What

Nature

in

purpose

Philosophy?

is

What

34

new

comes

into

new

to

that

us

subliminal

well

become

What
of the

one

for the

is

most

potent

evolution

We

in

all dreams

be

that

of

truths

the

each

"

of

"

the

hidden

real

attitude
he

the

is the

the

and

of

of the
finds

man

this
The

self

true

side

thing

of

which

for

siof-

the

man

personality,
;

the

world

in

spiritualenergy
the

towards
the

made

of

counterpart
of

is

"abysmal

transcendent

inward

himself;

response

well

birth.

the

faith

invisible

source

ever-changing

the

dwells

genuine

which

character,

which

soul

present

bring

to

the
in

well

it may

the

and

sciously
con-

things

can

help
to

knowledge

and

down

Far

is of eternal

us

faith

life

buried

of the

nificance,
the

will

of

it may

that

any

make

and

about

sub-conscious

than

that

dream

idlest ; but

knowledsfe

self.

hidden

Its

final truth

Philosophy

life is

deeps

has

35

meaning

consciousness,

to

sub-conscious
true

life.

see

the

deeper

that

inner

to

the

soul

themselves
be

forces

Philosophy.

knowing
is of

of the

of the

begin

now

purpose

Philosophy?

actual, living,

by

soul

his
D

"

to

the

the
what

that

for the

thought,
that

it is,

therefore

believe,
to

rest

that

by

men

of

with

all

into

of

the

the

of

certain

it may

those
mediate

in

be, does

not

except

so

sub-conscious

between

the

that

spiritual Nature

life

far

we

To

with
the

to

as

buried

objective

the

soul, however

it is

regions

of

light of

say

misuse

the

descend

the

as

are

inmost

define

we

the

if

faith,

self; but

constitute

the

that

glaring

impossible

individual

depths

tolerably

is

be

and

really

we

to

near

"

but

what

endowed

equally

It

living

ignorance.

our

would

things,

many

follows

of

power

response

know

equally

are

language.

limits

to

means

no

content

all

truth

of

hope

therefore

and

of

it

just said,

ever-changing

never

the

among

one

"

have

as

an

may

reason

all

determine

To

is, is beyond

response

it,

through

stream

of its life.

channels

deeper

we

it, that

overshadow

that

underlie

it, that

environ

that

realities

Philosophy?

is

What

36

it is

presence

man's

brought

real
sonality
per-

into

his

life which

his

conscious-

What
and

ness

the

is
total

darkness

to

Faith

I understand

faith,just
the

and

difference

for

life

the

that

waters

reservoirs

of

head-springs

faith, just

their

character

is

just

the
of

one

of

and

the

this

is

in

as

us

to

the

to

utilize

causing

for

every
the

constant

just

they

as

decisive

It

is the

purify

only

way

opportunity

imprisoned
current

to

his
of
of

are

in

duty
faith

doing
ding
provi-

waters,
set

for

what

of

what

on

the

very

sible,
respon-

are

reaction

and

dark

limits, for

other.

deepen

own

responsible

are

do

and

best, perhaps

outlets
so

and

inevitable

as

case

each

say

Men

the

and

and

they

his

the

are

undefinable

as

is

city
capa-

those

from

truth.

certain

their

think

into

drawing

spiritualitywhich

within

they

individual's

rise

of ideal

faith

and

potentialitiesof faith,

for

words,

character;

from

faith

the

by

actualizing the

other

in

or,

differs

from

differs

word)

between

determined

largely

his

all

invariably end.

the

character

as

37

which

in

himself

explore

attempts

(as

Philosophy?

from

and
the

deeper

there

conduct

of

Of

special interest
The

duty

of

plane

the
to

chief

the

we

of
fresh

deepen

to

wish

to

make

first duties

is to

it, to

get

know

what

it

To
of

to

and

recently

try

to

(so

become

far

as

the

sciousness
con-

one

scious
uncon-

if

so,

we

faith, if

our

of

one

grow,

our

seen,

And

strengthen

is

For

out.

and

solved

it

yet

stimulating

it live

inquiry.
be

and

activity.

is of

alone

cannot

them
have

we

thought.

present

life

(or

poetry
of

third

our

thought,

means

self into
wish

of

think

to

try

is, as
of

in

us

problems

great

on

to

of

that

is

the

oudets

three

these

third

the

art);

creative

is that

first

is that

second

the

The

faith.

of

energies

hidden

the

for

outlets

chief

three

are

tion
direc-

life.

individual

of the

the

realityin
spiritual

of

sources

Now

Philosophy?

is

What

38

our

conscious

may

be

of

possible)

really is.
undertake

Philosophy.

something

more

this

task

is

the

function

Philosophical*speculation
than

mere

pastime

for

our

is

What
idle

is

hours, something

of skill,something
for

mental

our

it and

his

and

that,

that

it will

any),

of its

because
influence
as,

when

come

in

sub-conscious

take

faith

consciousness,

raised

to

filled

this

place
is
a

the sub- conscious

profounder

by potencies

of

up

yet
;

so,

faith

can

him

of

result
achieve

that

truth

any), but

stimulating

the

soul.

from

deeper

spiritualemotion

man's

within

left

deep

sources

when

level, and

For

the

profounder

has

by

man

reach

brought
yet

part

its

in

it is yet

never

life of

from

be

scientific

pumped

its

of his

that

will

never

inner

supplies

to

any

will

is

water

well, fresh

of

issue,

material

any

it

though

that

thing

salutary reaction,
the

on

exercise

ever

thought,

of

game

definite

must

(for it

(for it

mere

mere

thinking

because

because

reach

it will

of

the

achieve

any

it is and

mind,

not

nor

of

be

important

most

39

Hopeless

circle

logicallyvicious

with

than

more

ever

though

far the

than

more

muscles.

must

involved

do

Philosophy?

ken

faith

the

is

place

empty
which

is

drawn

are

till the

at

sucked

currents

sea,

the

the

of

ocean

they

ascend

which
as

is the

ether

the

into

of

stream

think

approach
To

to

with

dowered

duty.

For,
of

Thinker,

apart

from

thoughts,
may

well

on

the
the

when
become

tinuous
con-

surely

as

spiritualdeath.
with

to

few

very

happens

one

it, is

speculation

his

formulated,

gift,if

soul

matters

great

lucidityis given
the

exercise

been

about

is its

movement

the

spirituallife of

as

cause,

thought,

of

sub-conscious

complete stagnation
To

self"

"subliminal

the

depths,

distils from

consciousness

which

ideas

the

of

its

into

far

descend

and

the

circulate

breadth

leng-th and

of
are

of

bosom

which

generated

the

ocean-world,

the

from

sun

are

all

throuoh

so

the

by

up

clouds

when

as,

on

depths

darkest

the

to

Or

life.

inward

the

last

consciousness

of

action

quickening

reservoirs,

darker

and

deeper

from

reaches

faith

Philosophy?

is

What

40

high

men.

have

to

and

sacred

quickening
buried

fluence
in-

life of the

systematized
the

any

means

and
of

What

helping-

others

medium

of

the

as

thinking,

thought,

the
those

of

mind

are

The
his

out

life

all

his

fellow

mere

teaching

thousands

teaching

his

logic

his

thoughts,

of

souls

to

solve

to

by

himself

and

think

so

them.

not

by

of

the

to

his

to

ever

fluence.
in-

wore

but

seemed
he

words,

minds

meditation
for

to

was

be

really

thousands

of

cogency

of

influence

of

the

stimulating
out

tween
be-

alone
he

tens

doing

tems,
sys-

value,

the

that

fruitless

of

the

as

respond

While

by

Systems

and

sage

for

them,

but

life, and

to

webs

weaving

men,

able

men.

faith.

for

communication

Thinker

not

outlets

valueless

the

apparently

thinking,

was

of

loneliest

in

the

through

inexhaustible

and

of

who

their

always

channels

41

new

open

of

immense

providing

and,

to

waters

though

of

are

think

to

imprisoned

of

Philosophy?

is

great

problems

strengthen

their

III.

do

IVkai
last

reacting

my

the

thought.

In

make

will

question

the

outset

or

real

try

This

to

become,

attitude,

towards

and

stress

very

its

the

attitude,

need

the

be

to

is

of

world
whatever

in

which
it

may

foreseen
from

this

sonal
per-

constrained,

things,

attitude

my

given,

me

solve

to

of

my

by

become,

What

impersonal.
real

to

deter

not

attempt

bias

effort

very

may

Philosophy

problem.
the

it

yet
In

proceeding.

much

This

of

object

when

answer,

ever

it stands

answer

an

the

make

the

the

am

thinking

my

is

words,

other
elaborate

void.

and

null

which

faith

to

of

process

very

transform

that

at

the

that

feeling,

modifying

and

is

thought

As

answer.

upon

reason

will

to

upon

philosopher,

as

and

first

the

is

believe?

really
which,

question

called

to

is

true

find

be, when

my

self,

myself.
con-

What

is

Philosophy?

sciously realized,

will

general conception

of

of
How

such

is

least

at

part
frames

or

faculty

which

work
we

in

helps

call

for

must

be

to

these

methods

work

most

will

work

that

of

Science.

in

it

all

If

laws

of its

studied
the

is

it

compatible

conditions

to

being,
that
Now

nature.

where

field

bears

they

in which

The
will

applies

under

with
which

itself

itself, imitatis
essential
be

itself

to

the

features

the

study

just

profoundly

it will

have

in

tandis,
mu-

reproduced

philosophicalproblems, reproduced
as

it

methods

its

and

ask

we

expect

the

to

the

theories,

must

bear

method

when

faculty which

reason

Philosophy.

scientific

reason,

As

will

so

the

In

successfullyis unquestionably

most

Science,

of

best

successfully:

they

framed?

follow

be

things."

be

the

congenial

to

we

with
it to

expect

of

reason.

us,

of

ment,
environ-

my

theory

"

frame

to

accordance

happen

of

use

we

work

to

reason

the

by

form

and

myself

theory

the

take

all-embracing

an

43

to

so

by
of
far

altered
work.

Philosophy,

In

the

that

trust

of

guarantee

nature

to

Here

we

which

inspired and

the

to

from

what

the

which

on

from

and

Science,

and

by

will

reason

in the

faith

by

the

tial
essen-

derivative

actual

criterion

unity,
will

nature

in

has

is

obvious

form
science.
to

of

which

for

different

it takes

naturalness, and

of

proof

for

reason,

physical

believe.

structures,

penultimate

widely

take

must

universality, whether

search

the

But

it is my

bedrock

in

as

Nature,

that

therefore

its

guided

potential,is

the

all its materials.

Philosophy,

conviction

of

all

quarries

of

that

What

and

I do
the

to

come

unity

her,

perceive,

to

nature

perceive.

must

believe, that

it

In

or

it is my

builds

reason

be

and

I do

that

in

criterion

ultimate

is the

Nature

What

truth.

of

assumption

this

from

of

worthy

is

Nature

will

reason

instinctivelyrepose

we

infer

will

and

Science,

in

as

that

by assuming

start

Philosophy?

is

What

44

deal

in

truth.

so

genial
con-

reasons

philosophy
The

with

student
what

are

What

vulgarly

called

objective

his

materials, and

the

underlying

and
to

with

deal

which
as

the

is

to

are

forms

an

with

example)
the

why

lawn

night, he
on

the

give

his

universal
that

hope
the

he

is

he
to

The

to

the
or

perceives.

universal

be

after

his

from

able

element

to

take

explain

and

less
cloud-

that

there

is dew

and

task
the

so

in

ception
per-

he

discovering
in

thinker

in

(to

clear

elements

the

The
when

even

though

of

The

which

transient

the

element

hand

work

work

his

and

are

universal

to

element

escape

not

quite certain

ready

mind

wet

ing
feel-

symbols.

for

has

of

reality of

pass,

causes

evanescent

certainty

may

is

of
nature

and
;

are

discover

expressions

with
doubt

grass.
is

tries

undecipherable

and

begins

to

hidden

shift and

physicist begins
he

he

April day

an

the

they

as

These

changeable

on

discover

facts.

of inward

student

as

45

unifying network

and

feelings and

clouds

these,

in these

The

laws.

Philosophy?

is

of

the
can

the

things
never

searching
inward

can

for

expe-

Where
to

the

basis

of

of

science

structures

truth

has

he

depths

laying
able

to

task

hopeless

universality

them
he

he

will

is

ever

be

never

it is clear

Indeed

when

said, that
which

have

real

it, the

tendencies

truth

of

fountain

"

reinforced

and

assumption,
measure

to

"

even

that
of

believe

of
that

"

will

at

I do

just

What
must

the
mining
deter-

is the

have

is

be

inner

Nature

once

and

of
own

my

universality

that

has

task

interpreted by

Nature.

to

undertakes

reason

set

have

what

from

search

the

be

may

belief, it will

in

life, its first assumption

nature

The

build.

the

and

in

But

unfathomable

are

which

on

all

beginning.

explore

to

attempt

foundations

made.
been

with

which

on

built.

are

life

inner

But, however
for

certainty

done

never

the

of

in his

and

subjective universality which

that

the

provides

kind.
man-

physicistbegins, he aspires

the

with

end,

of

spiritualperceptions

the

in

riences,

Philosophy?

is

What

46

to

be

its second
the
it

proof
is

my

believe;

What
if I could

and

I should
so

be

much

but
in

of it

how

life?

inner
Nature

if I

How

the
the
to

lead

universal

essential
within
of

my

believing

me

to

believe

at

lineaments

Individual

being,

really am.

the

of my

medium
Now

must

there

searchlnof-

try

are

for the

far

to

must

makes
read

must

is

possible)
what

me

what

myself through

kind.
two

ways

universal

and

only

two

element

in

of

thinors.
o

try

to

measure

common

or

and

brought

We

try

vital

that

that

as

tance,
dis-

determining

when

which,

(so

scope

by

of

Evidently,

faith.

In

my

(shall

or

great

Science,

the

what

out

however

element

milate.
assi-

of

find

to

of

or

to

me

in

humanity
the

for

me

of

the

discover

truth,

tendencies

am

follow,

to

reallyam,

distinguish

to

apparent

constrains

am

47

ideal

of

possible

am

sanctions

?)

say

it is

as

the

from

what

ascertain

possession

But

real

Philosophy?

is

may

determine
of

either

their

differential

provisionallycall

est
great-

actuality,
their

com-

is, as

rule, but

that

and

nothing,

the

when

life.

Let

various

peaches,

in

from

hard

but

just

luscious

the

take

us

the

with

deal

we

ideal

is the

which

again,
"

we

all

to

pass

been

written

view

to

we

common

should

to

measure

to

to

what

admit

tion
perfecelement
the

realize.

So,

of

poetry

of differential

their

if

life

"

that

began,

that

and

ripe

exemplify,

poems

world

has

in common?

level

higher

the

determining
have

the

universal

all the

since

of

hundred

these

striving

are

the

this

development,

to

all

which

rule,

which

up

The

examine

to

were

type

Potentially, the

peach-hood.

in them

of

have

Actually, nothing.
of

of

excrescence

What

fruit.

as

phenomena

case

its bloom

shed

sure
mea-

common

the

stages

green

from

especially is

More

exactly nothing.
case

greatest

actuality is,

differential

of

things

removed

degree

one

greatest

similar

actualityin

of

measure

common

that the

found

It will be

ideal.

mon

Philosophy?

is

What

48

had

with

really is,
greatest

actuality was

What

is

exactly nothing,

had

striven

of

those

which

the

life, with

that

in

as

the
the

zero.

If

with

be

of

interpret.

to

finding a
be

the

so

poems,

spiritualphenomena

common

abandoned

region

at

the

of

ferment

of

inner

spiritual

development.
of

measure

determine

and

certainlycarry

infinityof
search

of

measure

as

best

acknowledged

seeks

of

common

to

"

"

actuality. Everything

no

process

need

we

for this will

"

In

is

greatest

"

idea

its ceaseless

yev6(T"c,

the

and

actualitymust

forces, there
eV

inward

outset.

very

they

realize,

could

and

Philosophy

of

which
to

ways

the

peaches

indeed, the

measure

really

was

ideal

which

of

49

song.

it is with

it is with

Here,

several

by studying

masterpieces

what

the

was

nature

ascertained

As

all

in their

ideal, the

an

that

and

them

to

common

Philosophy?

for

the

in

the

their

various

is

search

towards

finity
in-

perfection

greatest
carry

It

potentiality

unattainable

actuality will

peaches,

us

is

common

us

towards

stages
"

of

of

poetry

is

there
of

realize, and

imperfect

an

faith

The

to

in

surely as

of
possibilities

all

the

peaches,

most

mature.

Here

then,
else, that

which

is

men

highest, as

all its

The

it.

is the

counterpart

from

universal
of

bryonic
em-

the

most

faiths,from

lowest

with

peach-nature,
and

least

beauty,

developed

and

here

element

Nature,

realityand

of

an

lifeless

sweetness

the

ideal.

this

is but

men

apparently

elsewhere,

as

proof
of

the

of

best

faith

its

gling
strug-

animated

of
man

that

faiths

are

are

of the

it is itself in all

But

seed.

faith

perfect

or

all

all

average

of

of

which

mon
com-

various

which

embodiment

the

of

form

degraded

by

The

sustained

and

ideal

the

in

fortiori,

the

to

common

except
to

is

nothing

men

follow,

it not

does

ideal

potentialityof

the

but

if poems,

nothing

kinds, have

and

sorts

but

common

peach-hood

ideal

potentialityof
all

in

nothing

have

development,
the

Philosophy?

is

What

5o

and

in
as

if

to

where
no-

things

such

truth, is the

is

the

ideal.

What
To

determine

real

faith

ought

this,

will

here,
the

of

trying

is the

the

introduce

to

order

here

unifying

things,

is

what

determine

to

into

chaos,
For

task.

congenial

the

determine

to

function

elsewhere, and

as

if nowhere

and

else,

organizing

ment
ele-

all-pervadingbond

of

principle of harmony

paramount

order.
The

itself

that

at

the

is universal

faith,when

of

the

search

nothing
ideal
But

needs

less than

the

goal
how

If this

of all

is such

become
true

"

quasi

be

faith, when

ideal

must

reason,

out

consciously realized, becomes

Universe.

for

search

already pointed

quasi -philosophical conception,

theory

in faith

the

into

outset

I have

faith.

ideal

for

for what

search

transforms

the

In

51

believe, what

is, is

undertaking

ideal

and

by

do

multiplicityand

kinship, the

the

soul

my

whose

into

in

believe.

to

be

Philosophy?

what

reason,

unity

is

then

so,

undertaken
search

for

theory of things,"

speculative thought.
a

theory

to

be

evolved
E

"

Can

hope

we

those

I think

In

not.

them.

for

will

tell

nothing,

us

phenomenal

interpret them

of

our

in

inward

and

buried

ideal
turn

always
conscious

the

our

inward

preferring
testimony

have

on

the
of

begun
the

is the

them

we

Moreover,

that

qua

human

human

darkness

ultimate
means

faith,

in

of

unconscious

the

light

that

element

into

leading-

definite

Nature

them.

this

And
backs

we

phenomena

life which

truth.

no

of

ideal

the

have

only by

it is

interpret

for

follow

must

of the

must

to

search

our

faith

of

and

general conception
attempt

we

will

offer

that

spirituallife

and

until

existence,

to

can

inward

the

perceive

the

"

able
practicare

facts

investigation

our

of man's

phenomena

the

philosophy

in

But

themselves

"

is

who

all

for

phenomena,

qua

induction

Science

by

experience?

from

physical phenomena

because
same,

distilled

are

Science

of

processes

theories

philosophy

in

reproduce

to

inductive

which

Philosophy?

is

What

52

source

that

we

pheno7nena,
to

the

soul, and

What

is

always ignoring
yielded

in

man

them)

turn

must

until

of

standpoint
Even
are,

that

our

in

as

of

plays

method,

has

ever

been

and

the

and

facts

by

he

to

or

may

of

not

that

the

on

students
if full

The

the

experience

These

consciously

many
existence

of
;

them
but

ever

From

and

studies

successive
of

the

theses
hypo-

facts

hypotheses
realized

have

but

their

of

justice

another.

one

use

that

part

physicist are

experience

mind.
be

it.

light of

his

his

the

doubt

to

the

investigation

selects, arranges,

the

which

done

reacting

last

The

by

the

processes

by

scientific

but

imagination

to

inductive

ignored

scientific

his

in

each

conceptions.

hypotheses.

been

not

first

the

of

from

from

rule, greatly abridged

imagination

acting

them

dominant

own

(for

meaninor

studied

Science

is made

has

have

we

have

which,

do

to

their

wrest

53

they

meaning,

begin

not

until

facts

inner

will

they

course,

outward

their

up

Philosophy

work

gests
sugmay

it is
bable
proa

is

conscious
subnot

What

54

Philosophy?

is

effective

less

the

most

part in

secret.

This

feature

of

very

Alpha

the

think,

goal.

its

we

may,

personality

whole

its ultimate

the

process,
be

while
is

the

forward

one's

rather

than

generalized

evolved
of

it from

of

it from

the

genesis
and

which

plicated
com-

cannot

precision,

to

To

mystery.

things"

assumption,

an

determines
pre-

actually plays

reason

"theory

in

approach

inscrutable

in

subtle

steps

any

that

part

wrapped

have

with

forth

set

is

and

The

issue.

master-hypothesis

of his

controls
"

thought

his

to

as

appropriate facts, would

in it

put

sion
conclu-

pretend

experience,

observation

but

ginal
abori-

an

"

assumption
of

movement

as

The

guess.
itself

thinker

inalienable

and
the

the

of

road,

its

nothing

is

elaborated

and

sophic
philo-

ourselves

it from

thought

of

system

is, I

of

Omega

starting point,

Disguise

expanded

an

and

for

on

method

scientific

its

method,
and

it is carried

because

the

and
savour

to

to

have

tion
investigaeither

What
of
a

is

dishonesty
moment

of

spirituallife.

our

do,

at

shall

them

make

must

of

to

"

has

which

things

It is

us.

these

that
frame

the

the

facts

but

the

that

secret

inward
of

of

and

nature

environ

process

unconscious,
the

not

of

of

so

is

of
it is

so

an

more

wholly

entirely under

very

us

at

they

are

with

the

of

tion
induc-

help

us

to

by actually

feelings.

inner

have

we

what

things, but

our

But

looking

phenomena

and

we

tific
scien-

the

by furnishing

not

of the

suffer

wise,

them

them

made

movement

somethinsf

they

as

are

that

way

thoughts

influencing our
in

from
very

theories

our

if

facts

not

quasi-scientific
process

for any

data

we

ourselves

life, the

of

for

lifelong meditation.

logically "gathered"
theory

if

objects,

flatter

not

Not

us,

will

facts

and,

the

then

study,
we

them

ignore

to

us

Confronting

these

turn,

every

55

salient

the

ignore

to

we

self-deception.

of

or

are

Philosophy

life

there

induction

than

That

from

probable

instinctive
the

is

control

and
of

quasi-objectivelogicof Nature,

the

that

When
worth

has

hypothesis

has

method

impracticable,

delusive,

as

If

Science.
of

"theory
that

the

of
in""
a

them

to

to

prove

ask-

are

for

testing"
the

"

who

value

such

frames

pleases, live by
this

of

light

philosophical theory experimentally,

man

in

our

the

we

As

substantiate.

tempted,
at-

of

charge

by

which

to

is

experience,

the

facts

our

hypothesis

very

try

by

out

open

interpreted

having

if

from

then

and

borne

are

ourselves

lay

we

it

processes

deductions

draw

we

losophy
Phi-

in

reproduction

inductive

things,"

these

feature

reproduce

the

as

the

of

Philosophy

this

reproduced
to

done

impracticable and,

as

its

is this

Can

be

it.

to

framed

been

it works.

Consciously

applied

How

tested.

be

how

scientific

of

be

to

seeing

By

well

cannot

its scientific

with

induction,

of

name

associations,

Philosophy?

is

What

56

it and

experimental
;

for, however

test

see

will

theory
how
have

convincing

can,

it works
no

if he
:

but

scientific

it may

be

to

is

What
the

experimenter,

too

subjective, to appeal

and

far

so

these

by,
is

will

will

to, and

steps

its

correctness

(in

issue, and

easily

be

meaning

mistaken.

Give

sub-conscious

your

reason

heart

and

try

soul

live

assimilate

worth.

Reason

helping

the

interpret

sympathy

with

by helping

itself
and

soul

through

it

let

they

will

the

it

insight into

it

test

its

theory

read

to

the

your

over

become

to

medium

the

to

which

brood

evolved

individual

cannot

from

you

it and

an

theory

your

it, and

has

of its faith,
and

with

the

has

which

distil

to

nor

of

sense

process
of

of

part

professed

to

the

Yet

but

traced

be

logical

the

the

one

doubted

cannot

process

determined.

word)

and

this

in

of life
buried

the

in

test

be

sults,
re-

causes

theory

one's

scarcely

conclusions

different

to

searching

can

him

but

different

That

soul

the

that

to

inward,

too

produce perceptible

minds.

subjected

57

anyone

referred

be

main

to

suggest

even

different

life of the

it is in the

it does

as

Philosophy

by

scious
con-

itself
of

"general

58
of

heart

Philosophy?

What

is

man."

And

theory by referring

it back

Reason

say

soul.

it

Is

these

questions,
them.
must

try

of

reason,

is submitted

that
this

content

heart"

thinker
of
not

special or

the

must

narrower

must

the

dream

thinker's
of

its

in

verify

only

expect
sense

of the

Humanity

the

word.

the

hypotheses

inner

own

to

feel

agent

subjecting

them

Does

"

own.

the

as

theory

possible

as

must

quasi-professional tests
not

the

take

itself, it

must

but

far

as

must

beating

then,

Reason,

must

it

with

partnership

of the

"

itself, it

"general

It

the

of

it asks,

it. when

to

me

universalize
into

it verifies

When

ance
guid-

the

medium

the

through

to

individual

the

again

soul

the

help

itself,under

read

to

of others.

souls

here

For

asked

having

must

reason

it ?

in

rest

you

And,

really yours?"

answer

soul

Do

"Are

soul,

the

to

this ?

with

content

you

must

individual

the

to

the

test

must

reason

be

them
of

and

terprete
in-

It

life.
to

its

any
own.

rational,
It

must

in
not

What
them

require
from

to

self-evident

have

the

satisfied

in

judge

this
of

which
so

as

their

far

it has
as

live

helped

it advances

gradually

of the

the

words,
and

between

itself,and

opposites

into

assimilates

imagination
other

and
it

to

out

of

emerges
soul.

itself

sides

the

can

itself

as

life

itself

the
it

it

region,

insight and
In

explores.
the

between
of

For

man's

tional
ra-

nature,

faith, gradually effaces

fusion

the
This

It

inner

shadowy

distinction

and

reason

know

life which

emotional

self

strengthened just

to

that

mands
de-

to

that

in

again

the

reason

By dying

quickened

it has

that

to

they

as

inmost

other

no

own

and

satisfy

man's

merits.

it will

reason

of

and

way

its

by

according
to

duced
in-

business

methods,

failed

desires

Its

them

test

them

or

59

logically

or

facts.

assimilative

reject

or

and
is

to

logicallydeduced

premises,

soul

subtle,

accept

been

indisputable

help

secret,

Philosophy

have

to

from
is

is

of

these

apparent

higher unity
"

the

soul,

of the

the

divisibl
in-

whole

of

of

beintr

inner

one

of

man's

man

can

make

which

satisfies
nature,

theory

those

into

ocean

reality,and
and

true,

just
The

came.

far

so

fierce

ever

distillino;a

great

sea

of

the

later

(if it

and

is

mere

the

haze

or

as

no

vie

"

has

forward,

theory
When

to

in

which
a

to

which

its

he

is

scious
uncon-

Itself

theory

thouorht

is

is

"

the

from
but

from

sooner

that

feeling,and
its eternal

sea,

brain)

thinker's

the

broad

absorbed
re-

consciousness

of the
into

the

true) it originally

really come

test

such,

loses

profonde

mirage

is the

truth

of

of

of emotion,

stream

the

haze

will condense

As

be

light

and

entirely

is

(if the

it is

as

of

of

proof

of

which

from

itself

depths

which

in
spirituality,
in

final
it

soul

the

into

that

is

true

needs

paramount
which

the

of

theory

true

draw

And

own.

being

the

and

embrace

one

Court

supreme

"

philosophy.

inner

its

the

is

man

in

Appeal

life is

Philosophy?

is

What

6o

return,
source.

theorist

looks

outlines, should

preparing

physicistis framing

for
a

fication.
veri-

hypo-

he

thesis

What

is

always

looks

unconsciously,
undergo
enable

it

the

When
his

that

test

when

the

he

words

He

then

words,

must

thing
or

and

at

being

given,

which

Nature

any
to

because

I share

Nature,

in

own

master

and

his

the

that

lie

it

tendencies,

all

has

his

not

in

than

must

for

may

may

take,

give

faction,
satis-

satisfaction

desires

men

the

if

of

things
it

that

nature

through

of

master

is

"

he

undergo

deeper

form

provide

it with

to

himself,

theory

those

akin

searching

judgment

to

to

scathed
un-

Nature,

the

whatever

rate

it is

towards

way

have

say

my

the
"

to

to

thinking.

will

it is clear

about

high

in

view

thoughts

in

evolved

one

it

However

"

in

conception

submits

life.

inner

be

steadily

keep

have

emerge

life and

of

half

Something

feeling

is

conception

should

and

tests

place

take

it will

framing"

ordeal.

thinker

master

in

6i

perhaps

that

tests

those

their

should

this

forward,

design

stand

to

from
to

the

to

his

and

Philosophy?

with

truly
with

evolution

inspired my

mine

which
of

her

heart."

IV.

We

are

is

be

as

it

is

that

certain

is,
but

thought
life,
is
is

of

not

to

self?

process

of

The

ideal

As

the

the
of

law

abstract

plane

of

But
of

being

of

mathematics,

its

man

must

we

central

which

living
the

standpoint

man.

what
is

the

the

things,
thinker
of
is
still

the

the
in

endeavour,

tendencies,

growth

truth

conscious

in

of

it

sophy
Philo-

of

for

all

by

then

man,

dream

development,
its

of

of

the

from

the

ascertaining

language

but

rooted.

rejected

or

optimism

alone

man

self, of

true

latent

false

or

function

the

on

things

see

final
search

to

the

to

securely

true

by

not

true

as

soul

and

tinct
dis-

philosophical

accepted

the

minister

to

is

heart

oreneral

the

If

regarded

to

according

Philosophy

set

to

task.

definite

and

theory

able

now

or,

equation

to

in

to

termine
de-

the
its

What
curve

in

and

is

tendencies,

order

traced.

bias

strain

certain

and

of

persistence

and

we

have

right

desire

which
or

in

otherwise
that

saying

highest, have

in the

hints, and
her

resources

and

laws.

will

be.

that

man

open

his

And
It is
like

"

in

adapt

it has

as

through
every

the

other

communications

the attractive

force

of which

her

to

so

is the

facts

it

always

of

desire

organism
his

to

utilize

to

medium

with

rary,
tempo-

Nature's

effort

been,

as

in

lowest

to

ourselves

justified

are

response
our

in

elements

local, or

or

of

course

and

tural
na-

measure

desires, from

our

arisen

scious
con-

Ignoring,

do, those

to

so

generated

certain

exceptional,we
all

of

is

strength.

morbid,

are

is the

forces, operating
with

and

every

bias

the
be

can

desire

natural

sires.
de-

which

in

realization

natural

direction

its central

nature

natural

of

field

human

semi-conscious

or

the

other

no

63

its dominant

study

of

movement

clearly

by

is

ascertain

to

must

we

There
real

Philosophy

own

"

keeps
ideal,

mainspring

his

it

and

desires

thinker

his

submit

heart's

influx

actual

the

That
the

for
bound
the

that

and

be

to

is

word,

the

things

of

the

self-evident

word

for

pressure

it is

it is

will

only

in

of

desire

ideal

he

ment
judgnot

are

advent

which

heart's
the

best

what
in terms

allow

response
that

should

the

truth.

only

good

the

but

light.

towards

Indeed

aim

to

dawning

optimistic,in

If the

that

ideal's

of

movement

good.

theory

satisfaction

always
be

of its

ness
wit-

for these

the

of

bear

as

truth"

at

desires

heralds

the

live.

it is well

is in

itself, our

things

see

"guesses

of the

merely

to

then

them,

sees

the

is

pursue

which

that

pains
to

medium
to

us

evolve

to

effort

the

ideal

the

growing

its eternal

the

man

invites

of

of

counterpart

ideal

germ

the

the

through

struggles

are

to

of

the

as

heart

every

the

that

desire
;

and

It is

aims.

highest

Philosophy

highest energies

of his

of

is

What

64

the

provides
desires

of

sense

Desire

is
to

seems

of desire

itself

to

to

the

idea

is

of

be

fined
de-

stress

good

is

What
has

evolved

To

debate

and
the

is therefore

will

and

be

ever

through

and

and

secrets

need

central
which

the

question, but
not

I used

help myself,
that

there

is

there

is desire

feeling
"

life

the

there

dual, because

is

dent
dependesire

there
its

desire,
is

trust.

desire

In

we

lacies
fal-

ism
optim-

logical.

v^or^
this

faith
vital

I could

was

and

But

of

because

place.

her

the

expose

prejudge

in

us

to

will ?

of the

word

been

and

necessity

to

take

there

to

made

because

could

word

her

us

own

ever

physical, not

resort,

seemed

have

may

have

discloses

The

I have

our

of

ourselves

last

that

use

when

to

Nature

pessimism.

What

totalityof things

good

to

of

outcome

movements

announces

is,in the

goodness

thought.

goodness
is

minds.

our

the

"

subordinate

trouble

not

of

In

what

of

those

on

of

category

conceptions

the

bring

to

in

65

Nature's

of

confusion

we

the

under

of

impertinence,

an

right have

itself

shaped

question

inextricable

an

Philosophy?

other

no

Wherever

wherever
this

without

dual

trust

is

while

wholly ineffective,
is

purely passive

the
the

From

worth

secret

is

Philosophy

to

of

The

be

when

no

the

and

itself

that

reason

that
but
shall

all the
be

not

in order

discerns
of

theory

of

this will

this

realms

world
and

in

trust

prove

Nature,

closes
realized, dis-

and

potentialitiesof
to

justify these

so

and

demands

to

from

daringly optimistic
this

phases
the

the

of

minds

them,

things

transfigured by

faith.

achievement

And
For

us

life is

inexhaustible

joy, and,

mind

convinced

our

consciously accepted
in

hope

task.

easy

has

she

as

souls, that

highest

truth.

fundamental

of

optimists.

us,

our

convince

to

greatest

incurable

are

recesses

living.

same

the

to

living things, has

all

convinced

up

himself.

finds

he

already convinced

has

Nature

in the

plants

of

living things

all

men

least

attitude

man's

in

which

in

world

ginal
is abori-

what

to

come

we

"

desire

without

trust

protoplasmic

and

towards

Philosophy?

is

What

66

glow

of

life

only,

existence,

of its triumphant

is

What

then

Philosophy
for
there
as

pessimists

are

ordinary

among

does

fact

in

ends

heart

instead

of

failed

his mission

why

the

and
very

who

so

of

they

what

them

are

unknown

failed

the

it is that

himself

are

reason

so

from

ventures,

they

but

fulfil his

chief

never

itself,

does

to

that

is

on

thinker

told

never

that

to

and

aimless

having

For

outlook

Philosophy

grievously miscarry

organize

its

The

reallywas.

enterprises

outset

realized

he

because

own

shows

dissipating its gloom,

"

what

its

astray.

with

evidently

and

miscarried,

despair

comfort

and

intensify it, has

mission,

and

the

but

philosophy

has

gone

seeking, perhaps

spiritualhelp

who,

has

dissatisfied

is
is

life,and
for

which

which

well

sentiment

pessimistic

of doubt

presence

the

The

That
as

undeniable,

me.

enterprise

an

expedition

the

life.

of

thinkers

is

men

search

essence

pessimistic theory is, on

showing,
an

its

among

disconcert

not

originates in

that

is in

optimistic explanation

an

67

Philosophy?

often
the

those

consciously
striving

to

first and

The

discover.

have

for

seek

to

disperse

wounds,

places smooth,
fulfil all

turn,

the

other,

possible

his

that
that

beauty
must

when

the
ness
busiception
con-

heal

wrongs,

all

all

rough

higher desires,

our

give

"

us

less
in limit-

which

for

seek

this

stincti
in-

we

this, assuming

explanation

thinker

road.

the

burns

then

light
at

devise

will

bring

into

harmony

the

to

He

happiness

of

life,and

of

it becomes

out

map

ideal

ideal

goodness

heart

of

Nature.

theory

of

things

facts

of

ming
assu-

destiny,

the

these

earlier

the

begin by

must

is man's

admitted
with

him

before

goal

this

for the

of

stages

will

is true.

with

For

all

dreams,

to

"

that

outset

all

light towards

the

floods"

mind

his

clouds, make

satisfy

nobler

our

right

all

stage

world-embracing

shall

which

that

himself

convinced

has
is

and

of the

successfullyaccomplished

been

thinker

no

decisive

most

speculative movement

in the

at

Philosophy?

is

What

68

and
He

which

existence

hypothetical

truths.

He

will

facts

of

of

existence

faith.
he

being
read

his

the

into

them

into

have

of

the

in

man

him.
is

phrase,
But

For

in
man

world

the
is

(as

they

are

to

"

there

of

want

call

each

that

fitter

objective

fact.

tween
always carefully distinguish beof fact

residuum

called

true.

It is

him

for

what,

of

interpretations
often

erately
delib-

has

own.

what

perhaps

may

this

he

confront

them

of

must

we

that

and,

spiritualphenomenon

every

residuum

lates
postu-

subjective interpretation

that

makes

turn

In

his

facts

great

his

made

mistic
opti-

deliberately

should

postulate which

seen) by

and

studies

he

his

unconsciously,

or

he

that

and

accepted
we

that

facts

admitted

of

aid

prejudices

own

it is well

so,

the

by

Consciously

read

must

the

interpret

course

69

Philosophy

is

What

example,
is

interpretation of

this

wicked
fact.

"

are

is moral
"the
is

That

so

objectively

as

That

tive
subjec-

we

there

that

fact.

desperately

which

accept

to

upon

it

those

and

heart

evil
of

subjective
evil

is

only

the

in

**good

there

That

"the

is

suffering in

whole
"

this

That

fact.

is

expands

the

soul

the

of

man's

fact.

That

That

into

"

is

third.

idiosyncrasy
chemical

the

to

and

(in

facts

is the

of existence

optimism.-*

He

all

the

seem

must

to

to

peutthe

into
fact

quasi-

which
a

he

tive
subjec-

probability) he

consciously
un-

existence.
if the

give

take

one

is the

cases

it into

do

is another.

these

objective

thinker

is

death

enters

with

"

is
is

"grand

of

thinker

ascribes
What

is

transforms

which

life

of

That

each

combination

contemplates,
fact

of

In

earth

mansions"

there

death

on

end

this

and

heart

That

life

fact.

heavenly
death

beyond

etre

is the

"

this

interpretationof
"usherer

bodily

death

tra-

world

cruel

and

third.

and

groaneth

unjust

is

fact.

interpretationof

one

an

is

pain purifiesthe

That

is another.

end

is

character.

world

the

creation

terpret
in-

subjective

different

widely

together

vaileth

is

making"

of
That

Philosophy?

is

What

70

the

pains

admitted
lie
to

to

his

show

is

What
that

they

do

antagonism
that

or

Philosophy?

it is apparent,

to

his

darker

facts

facts, finite

existence
actual

and

there

can

their

be

at

darkness,

widened,

assimilate

end

their

conception

all-embracing
spare
darker

the

in view,

within

its

experiences

brightest hopes

so

to

seem

their
and

its

into

will

will

be

and

own

it makes

try
so

to

With

own.

to

frame

large

and

and

room

limits

harmonize

subtle

that

into

Nature,

illimitable

fore
there-

faith

light

its

to

thinker

there

that

between

it disarms

that

effort

of life and

ideal,

strengthened

be

meaning

rects
di-

faith

while

transformed

very

the

the

facts

and

may

but

and

His

the

brings

be

fact

controversy

light.

itself

it will

This

his

as

infinite

it ;

it will

real.

quel objective

and

with

and

self, by the

true

its

with

hostility

their

this

and

coalesce
war

lasting

no

darkness
must

to

be

their

that

or

are,

the

itself towards

it, that

postulate ;

primary

of

to

not

of this

interpretation

contradict

lie

the

give

not

71

for
with

to

man's

his

all-pervading

it will

that

will

He

of

and

Or, he

will

curve

and

of existence,

passing through

suffering,it will,
its
of

movement,

own

ideal

natural

this

the

points

In

order

of

to

the

to

it

imaginary points,

points

the

far

"

actual, and,

If such

as

possible
points
The

are

as

range

needed,

philosophy

the

of

they
that

and

law

of

che

that

it

carry

goal,

he

pass

through

lie

can

our

to

up

direction

the

which
we

ter
mas-

sin

of

shall

curve

make

the

ensure

infinitelydistant

it necessary

the

in

time.

leading

to

on

pass

evolution

towards
find

good.

after

obedience

in

of

thought

that

need

boundless

range
in

construct

so

sin

lopment
deve-

which

forces

"

immeasurable

an

in the

final evolution

full and

for their
arena

mighty forces,

that

us

incidents

only

suffering are

and

convince

to

try

by

passing beyond

and

them

ing
sweep-

it but

that confront

obstacles

interpenetrating
them.

by

opposition, not

disarm

the

aside

Philosophy?

is

What

72

see

may

beyond
at

sent,
pre-

experience.
be

must

fails

to

use

vided.
prothe

What

wings

of

finds
are

the

things,

he

must

supply

them.

the

finds

free

it necessary
he

as

strength
flimsy

this

of

webs

than

mind.

will

which
is wise

of

course

he

will

is

he

in

let

the
the

to

of

him

tangle
en-

to

tence
exismake

tion.
hesitano

disproved

labour

as

arguments

moment's

be

If

so.

planes

put forward

not

do

it necessary

other

possibly

can

to

pre-exis-

striving

it

freely

it

through

finds

without

beyond

be, let him,

physical world,

assumption
He

are

life

that

ever

If he

there
the

boldly

assume

is

finds

the

or

to

to

necessary

question-begging

of

that

assume

it

feeling, break

Necessism
his

if he

to

his

of

he

extend

him

himself

feels

which

the

soul, let

of

range

finds

he

If

theses
hypo-

hesitate

not

immortality

the

of

tence

the

the

If

elaboration

limits, let him

fearlessly.

postulate

in

extend

apparent

far.

go

example,

If, for

to

necessary

73

purely imaginative
for

of

he

that

not

needed

theory

and

will

imagination

thinker

its

Philosophy?

is

thesis
hypo;

and

over-sedu-

lously to
as

it

what

prove

he

happens,

obsequiously

to

regions

expelled
much

in

If it is

of

borrow

to

by swinging

to

the

from
and

fro

Poetry, by refusing to
force

Am
end

serious
and

is

whole

aim
man

when

at

of

abstract

giving
the

"

has

as

method

and

measure

It

is

Science
to

the

Philosophy

Yes,

alternative

our

pursuit
must

surrender

be

to

Science.

some

between

say

imagination

thought?
what

of aim

to

only
and

tive
attrac-

can

main
re-

itself.

to

true

with

as

former.

either, that

of

liable

Philosophy

something

imagination

refuses

energies

always

Poetry

wait

Science,

who

his

latter, let it borrow

the

is the

is

with

common

of

thinker

intruder.

an

as

To

role

confines

what,

and

assume.

is the

he

which

from

to

The

facts

beyond

go

from

is free
facts

on

unprovable,

is

Philosophy.

of

not

Philosophy?

is

What

74

the

quite
?

The
truth.

satisfaction

that

optimism

way

of speculative

serious.

For

tific
pseudo-scien-

Philosophy
either

to

real, living,many-sided

the
self

What

"

which

in

is

ineless

words.

between

the

figments

of

that

the

goes

Knowing,

of

out

truth

pure

that

travels

needs

in

place

by drawing

vainest.

To

is

indisputable

another,
for
to

The

itself,and
And

even

for

is

this

there

are

cannot

one

no

What

doubtful

for

third, incredible

personal

if

from

of all dreams

man,

is

reaching

Philosophy.

in

ductive
in-

thinker

inferences

But

one

the

of Science

of

dream

bal
ver-

them.

of

the

begin with,

meaningless

fourth.

assert

for

wide

do, that

correct

indisputable premises

the

processes

the

in

the

tion
imagina-

and

Philosophy,

choice

and

the

far

pur-

mean-

its

heart

must

indisputable premises.
is the

of

facts

beyond

indulge

to

prone

far

by

maze

the

timistic
op-

merely

end

make

must

experimental

and

brain, between

he

as

it will

of

75

the

to

or

throucfh
It

by becoming

case

desires

ingenuity

are

which

shadow

end

imaginative

logical self, in
suinof

it will

case

and

Philosophy

element

possibly
could

is
be

start

sure

nated.
elimifrom

76

What

premises

as

general

useless

of

consensus

with

deal

ticallyunless

and

it is

were.

In

idle

deal

to

"therefores"

of

logicallysound
serious

from

their

they

become

things

that

faithful

to

to

of

there

words

that

they

pass

from

context

with

the

they

and

thinker

takes

symbol

and

reaches

the

has

when

goal

that

the
at

verging,
di-

context,

to

result

they

to

that
the

and

less

are

posed
sup-

this process

once

widen

of

used

less

each

reality,until

always

adequate

begun,

will

is

are

the

and

name,

experiences

express;

divergence

less

and

sophical
philo-

as

plausiblepremises

the

less

they

through

do,

conclusions,

originalsense,

if

as

advance,

of

risk
as

from

symbols,

them

often

of

speech.

human

of

with

so

be

medium

some

which

arguments

was

it would

mathematical

arguments
series

find
that

not

to

there

premises syllogis-

these

than

are

which

of

opinion,

could

one

other

expression
words

truth

the

to

to

For

Philosophy?

is

step
gap

that

between

last, when

demonstrated

the

he

truth, the

What
conclusion
to

be

is

be

that

what

the

the

was

in

the

path

all

to

himself

the

test

and

as

of

meaning
of

in

it ?

that

rather

Does

deeper
than

atmosphere
the

heart
away,

will

have

words.
that

there

his

sets
be-

is

thinker

"

his

ment
argu-

the

deadliest

The

but

must

subsidiary

dominant

tions
convic-

feeling.

He

must

ask

"Do

I feel

the

truth

again,

proposition

tion
imperfec-

empty

speculation

well

be

idea

of

conclusions

as

possibly

eaten

"

his

again

this

of

the

living

the

"

by

before

husk

start

of

been

safeguard.

conceptions,
"

into

danger

effectual

submit

thought

conclusion,

have

once

this

Against

its

will

thought

changed

one

rapidly

so

reached

what

been

taint

syllogism that, long

the

and

least

can

prove

must

high thought

no

spread

has

of

If

it

77

will

dream.

him

logically developed,

will

of

as

flawlessly true:

of

Philosophy

confronts

hollow

as

being"
"

is

Can
it

really

satisfy the

reason

which

intellectual, and

see

ments
requireis

which

tional
emo-

has

What

78

give

its

of

logic

own

account?

no

heart?"

my

science

when

indirect)of

have

is

"

of

the

The

central

have

Science

Philosophy.
to

the

logical

heart

the

of

stream

suggested
the

that

the

"

that

opposite

If

this

for the

the
be

so,

when

genuine
logical

it may
it

moment

be,
meets

tendency,
feel

men

poles

"

indeed."

perpetual
of

tion
oscilla-

Poetry

life-pulseof

very

then

verification

men

sophical
philo-

The

natural

what

constitutes

If

senses.

plausible

of

evidence

nothing

evidence

defeat

for

count

regenerated,

for

however

current

between
and

began

the

spiritualemotion.

words,

counter

"

of

the

inevitable

suffers

men

themselves

count

with

conflict

flow

physical

"

bodily

be

to

ever

theories

evidence

the

convince

to

with

conflict

to

of

theories

premises

can

appeal

it

when

time

verbal

they

Philosophy

they

fine, does

scientific

from

(direct or

will

In

processes

"

deductions

nothing

whose

the

from

that

realize

to

of

regeneration

The

dates

Philosophy?

is

the

appeal

of its theories

What

is

as

is

as

its

vital

appeal

the

problems.

to

is

the

towards

Each

cannot

the

swing
succumbed

Science,
itself.

and

The

to

in

the

doing

Poetry,
forward

swing

the

so

wards
to-

and

implies
Philosophy

towards

back

tion,
emo-

towards

movement

other.

of

impersonality,

towards

reason,

solution

towards

back

of

counterpart

very

Philosophy

the

for

swing

79

of

personality,

Science.

demands

work

reason

The

towards

the

of

part

Philosophy?

is

Poetry
attractive

has

that

has

dently
evi-

force

ceased

to

of

be

V.

And

for

now

Philosophy,

question.
word,

the
in

its

is

but

towards
The

supervision
ideas

originate
man's

of

side

of

the
of

by

sympathetic,

and

constructive"

working

the

in

to

sciousness
con-

real

attitude

man's

inmost

imagination,^
in

under

the

last

sort
re-

general

the

world-embracing

All

reason.

become

to

present

made

is

attempt

introspective,

faith,

general,

in

things

self.

and

personal

"

tending

ever

real

the

understand

attempt

interpret

to
"

able
unanswer-

our

as

systematic

inception

impersonal

to

answer

my

heart

in

the

emotional

"

inner

life,

and

all

bracing
world-em-

"

theories
heart
of

approval.

for

thinking

bringing

be

must

its

is

that

deeper

The

it
and

referred
value

quickens
therefore

back
of

the

the
inner

more

to

the

effort

life,
uni-

What

is

elements

versal

Philosophy?

within

man's

personality,and

heart,

at

be

he

makes

The

him

find, or

the

As

own.

ideal

good,

that

it which

does

not

indeed

but

the

the

theory

no

the

of

far-reaching and

From

this

what

is for

matter,

to

"

this

pels
com-

him

heart

to

his

in

the

lisfht

inevitably as
the

it is

sun,

lig-ht into

its advent,

that

content

its life,
"

the

of
the

ideal,
of

light

world-illuminatinghope.

the

me

his

permanently

can

position I,

namely,
is

light of

blinding light

promise

with

towards

brinor

not

the

of

general

naturally and

as

before

it, compels

turns

towards

plants turn
clear

heart

that

effort

very

the

thinking,

starts

conscious

find, the

to

try

it was

the

but

universalize

to

the

theory

any

thinker

become

to

of

it than

to

of

process

judge

began.

of

compass

thereby rendering

the

individuality;

own

of

submitted

process

of

end

competent

more

may

the

the

8i

for

one,

conclusion

that

interpret

the
and

pass
of

the

function of

justify

to

on

to

whole
sophy
Philomatis

his

of

optimism

unconquerable

the

reason

Philosophy?

is

What

82

hea7't.
I shall

I, for

that

deal

to

"

and

comprehensive
a

otherwise

though
deepened
so

and

intercourse

with

feed

my

thoughts

I
not

no

into

am

even

school.

of

the

so

hope
not

my

and

life in

serious
can

and

then
this

"

into

effort,

result, has
of

so

faith,

my

stimulated

its

fountains

channel
for

which

it, it

now

strongly pulsing

joy.

adept

an

provided

that

light of

mysterious
the

great

it first into

flood

current,

if

even

the

into

action,

it, that, through

overflows
of

of

the

have

means

things

barren

its

that

waves

of

widened

quickened

tent
impeni-

but

transform

theory

means

lifelong effort
faith

to

principle

master

it does

this, it

lift my

to

consciousness

and

the

For

me.

made

hav^e

incurable

than

more

no

means

simply

Perhaps

optimist.
it

an

am

one,

all this

that

told

be

at

student
pronounce

Philosophy.
of

it.
no

am

belong

shibboleth.

to

What

My
of

to

attempt
life

has

is

Philosophy?

think

been

in

unscientific,
nical

to

but,

"

me

its

such

own

out

the

the

highest

83

"^reat

problems

degree

unprofessional,
as

it

exceeding

is, it

has

great

formal,
in-

untech-

always
reward."

been

Br

THE

SAMS

cAUTHOT^

WHAT

IS

POETRY
AN

?
BY

ESSAY:

EDMOND

Price

3^. 6d.

TIMES.

would

Small

net.

Holmes

Mr.

*'
"

HOLMES

write

of

with

of

truths

for the

that

avoidance

SATURDAY

REFI

both

of the

commonplace."

SPECTATOR.

of poetry, he

BOOKMAN.

LANE,

have

has

author

be

to

he

of

is

true

profoundly

the

clear
met.

agreeably,has

expressed with
of

who

one

has

net.

dealing
instinct

suggestive

an

the

eloquence
'Second

"

Poetry.'

is

"

His

"

This

"

"

unworthy

"When

"

of

FuW

fervour

ACADEMY".

clearly and

elementary,he

and

for

that

sound

reallyillumining remarks
not

he

illustration,
and, though

E fV.~"

$1.25

requisite of

poetry

problems

and

Apology

JOHN

main

command

ready

the

writes

He
.

first

the

philosophically
upon

understanding
.

has

Price

jS^to.

Mr.

Holmes

gives us

detailed

criticism

quite admirable."

essay

is

very

Publisher,

beautiful,and
dignified,

timely."

suggestivelittle book."

LONDON

"

NEW

YORK

tAUrHOl^

SAME

THE

Sr

WHITMAN

WALT
ESSAY.

AN
FROM

With

Writings.

HIS

EDMOND
Price

LITERATURE."

We

Small

criticism
recommend

who

anyone

poet of

PILOT.

which

the

wishes

to

book

as

his

and

sane

guide to

competent

acquaintance

an

net.

praiseworthy.

as

safe and

$i.2S

faculty of

uncommon

as

begin

and

democracy

His

"
"

him

Price

has

is

ES

LM

^to.

Holmes

"Mr.

can

By

HO

^s.bd. net.

temperate

Selection

with

the

works."

illuminates

immediate

its

than

more

subject."
STAR.

Those

"
"

know

know

who

him

not,

him, ought

to

those

read

LITERARY

IVORLD.""

yet sanely,of the

Walt

Whitman

is
appreciated,

his poems

JOHN

Walt

LANE,

Mr.

him

and

Whitman's

and

those

those

who

who
hate
Mr.

Poetry,' by

included

Holmes

sympathetically,

writes

peculiarqualitiesof
The

poetry

and

love

who
'

Whitman,

Holmes."

Edmond

that

Walt

genuine

should
shown

by

be
the

Walt

desire

more

of

Whitman's
Mr.

widely

excellent

Holmes,

understood

selections

from

in this volume."

Publisher,

LONDON

"

NEW

YORK

SILENCE

THE

LOVE

OF

HOLMES

EDMOND

BY
T^s.bd.

Price

Small

net.

Size
IS.

bd.

"

SO

cents

TIMES.

net.

and

the best

evidence

by

"

"
"

indeed,

MAIL.

work

writer

gives

them

guished
distin-

are

of

much

than

more

ordinary

faculty."

it,and

activityof imagination,

more

than

slightergrounds

LANE,

and

of his art."

resources

ordinary merit
have

received

and,

"

no/nen

poeta.""
"

"Scholarly

sonnets,

full

of

passion

grace."

JOHN

will

that
sincerity,

poetry."

behind

of

of

of

teclinical

of the

on

many

famamque
DAILY

verse

and

Remarkable

ample command
TILOT.

sweetness,

is power

There

"

LITERATURE.

All

lover

the

Contains

"
"

quality.

to

chosen

has

he

tinction.
dis-

workmanship."

artist.

an

lucidity,a

them

commend

OUTLOOK.

of

net.

the best

with

school

form

of conscientious

work

The

*
"

^i

suggested

is

that

influence

the

net.

and

beauty

to

y.

"

uncommon

gone

of

his mastery

masters,

ECHO.

has

author

the

that

quite

Shakespearean

The
shows

-jscnet.

of

net.

Library."

Parchment

net.

2s.

"

volume

"A

"

Lover's

^1.2^

3 '""^hes.

S\ h

Leather

net.

Price

/^to.
The

"

in

Edition

Another

Cloth

JIUTHOT^

SAME

THE

'BY

Publisher,

LONDON

NEW

YORK

and

JlUTHOT{^

SAME

THE

BT

TRIUMPH

THE

LOVE

OF

SEQUENCE

SONNET

Price

HOLMES

EDMOND

BY

35. 6d.

ATHENAEUM.

of

elevation
and

ample

of

SPECTATOR.

his

"At

is in

He
he
best

achieves
Mr.

is

Holmes

on

the

right

level."

high

of Love'

moves

verse

wing

easy

"

Holmes's

net.

of sustained

and

statelyrhythm

Mr.

thought.

$1.25

Silence

Throughout

tradition.

Price

^to.

predecessor,The

both

command

its

Like

"
"

shows

Small

net.

no

unworthy
has passion,

He
discipleof Shakespeare the sonneteer.
and
imagination, and subtletyof thought, and skill with
his instrument.
Change an epithetor two in the following
tinguished
the less disand
it might well
nigh pass among
sonnet,

of the

sonnets

OUTLOOK.

PILOT.

"

"

distinguished,is

and

in this volume."

mellowed
SPEAKER.

himself."

artistry,luminous,

"His

"

Master

artistic,always distinguished."

"Always

"Admirable

in

its

ordered

beauty

and

academic

of design."
perfection
LITERARY

This

ff'ORLD.--"
himself

to

what

poetic adventures.
among
between
A
delightfulunion
T)AILY

NEIVS.""-

is the
is

one

Twice

time

second
of
he

the

he

most

has

has

mitted
com-

important

succeeded.
.

thought

and

music."

is also a triumph
Triumph of Love
of emotional
His
lines
expression and imaginative effort.
and
luminous, with a lucidity
are
dignity of phrase, and a
glintof epigram,"

JOHN

LANE,

'

The

Publisher,

'

LONDON

"

NEW

YORK