Contrarians are mostly not climate scientists - Ex: news weathermen are not climate scientists contrarian goals: stop climate legislation and regulation, stop mitigation of global warming 2 / 10 / 10 Copyright Jan W. Dash Who are the contrarians and what are their goals?
Contrarians are mostly not climate scientists - Ex: news weathermen are not climate scientists contrarian goals: stop climate legislation and regulation, stop mitigation of global warming 2 / 10 / 10 Copyright Jan W. Dash Who are the contrarians and what are their goals?
Contrarians are mostly not climate scientists - Ex: news weathermen are not climate scientists contrarian goals: stop climate legislation and regulation, stop mitigation of global warming 2 / 10 / 10 Copyright Jan W. Dash Who are the contrarians and what are their goals?
What do they say? Why are they wrong? Jan W. Dash, PhD
2/10/10 Copyright Jan W. Dash 1
Who are the contrarians and what are their goals? • Contrarians are mostly not climate scientists – Ex: news weathermen are not climate scientists • Contrarians are mostly U.S. phenomenon – Dominate US right-wing climate agenda – Support from fossil fuel, libertarian think tanks • Exxonsecrets.org has details • Contrarian goals: stop climate legislation and regulation, stop mitigation of global warming
2/10/10 Copyright Jan W. Dash 2
The Nature of Science • Science is “knowledge”, a web of facts and theory, together very strong – But, science is not mathematics – Mathematics: one chink or a missing fact or minor error invalidates a proof – Science: never “proves”, only degrees of certainty • Scientists are already “skeptics”, need persuasion – BUT once persuaded, need good reasons to change • Scientists in the field publish in journals – Peer review acts as a good (not perfect) filter 2/10/10 Copyright Jan W. Dash 3 Contrarian Distortion of Science • Contrarian conjectures are not science – Wrong, misinformed, irrelevant, distorted, cherry-picking, flimsy • Ex: “Sun responsible for recent global warming” = wrong – Good description = “Cargo-Cult” pseudoscience (Feynman) • Common contrarian tactics are not scientific – Use mass media (not peer-reviewed journals) – Ignore critiques of their arguments / conjectures – Copy Big Tobacco “doubt on smoking danger” tactic – Try to put “science in the courtroom”, use lawyer obfuscation – Try to discredit climate science and scientists • Nitpick, turn molehills into mountains, falsely generalize – Contrarian op-eds => destructive “Swift-Boat attacks” on science 2/10/10 Copyright Jan W. Dash 4 Solar Fluctuations did NOT cause global warming since 1980 • Sun just Oscillating: NO increasing trend – Contrarian conjecture of recent solar influence = False • Data: GISS/NASA
2/10/10 Copyright Jan W. Dash 5
Contrarian Attacks Wrong, Irrelevant, Cherry-picking • Contrarian “Global Cooling” Conjecture => Wrong – Cherry-picks the starting date 1998, indefensible scientifically • 1998 had high temperature due to huge El Niño weather effect • “Hacked emails” => Irrelevant to science results – Investigation underway, BUT contrarian generalization is false: – Climate science results, existence of global warming, climate data, models, projected impacts are NOT affected • “Himalayan glaciers” => Cherry-pick attack on IPCC – 2007 IPCC reports, summarize published work, 3000 pages – One paragraph wrong (p. 493, Vol. II); year 2035 = typo for 2350 – Glitch in IPCC review process, not general • Ref: Realclimate.org, also exhaustive AP email review
2/10/10 Copyright Jan W. Dash 6
Bottom Line on Contrarians • Main tactic: Sow doubt • Main goal: Stop action on global warming • More information on Realclimate