Professional Documents
Culture Documents
October 2012
ABSTRACT
The present study aims the Preliminary Design for a Bowstring tied-arch solution for a bridges
deck.
A research about the historical context and construction methods of tied-arch bridges was
initially conducted, and a data base with an extensive list of the constructed Bowstring bridges up to
date was assembled, with the compilation of the i) general layout information, ii) geometric
characteristics and iii) main steel / concrete quantities.
A Preliminary Study of several Bowstring deck solutions was performed, as alternative solutions
for a real highway double box-girder bridge deck erected by the balanced cantilever method, in order
to choose one of them, to perform the deck pre-design.
The pre-design of the deck was then performed, namely the deck slab, the steel girders, the
steel arch and the hanger sections, as well as the installed forces.
The required and relevant safety verifications were performed at Preliminary Study level,
supported by a tridimensional structural analysis model, using the software SAP2000.
To finish, main quantities and estimated cost were evaluated for the proposed deck, solution
and a comparison of these results with other Bowstring tied-arch bridges and with the erected
box-girder bridges was performed.
Conclusions about the advantages and disadvantages of the proposed solution were finally
discussed.
Keywords: tied-arch bridges, Bowstring bridge, hangers, bridge design, deck analysis, arch instability
1. INTRODUCTION
tied-arch
bridges
have
been
the Bowstring
upper
arch
bow,
always
strongly
the
(characterized
Net
by
suspension
the
crossed
system
hangers
bowstring bridge
deck
in Steinkjer,
Bolstadstraumen
Bridge,
60
km
[1]
[2]
weight.
The collected data allowed acquiring the
know-how to concentrate the information in
2. OBJECTIVES
Bowstring
tied-arch
bridges
worldwide;
65
60
55
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Motorway
Railway
High-speed Railway
Motorway/Railway
Motorway/Light
Railway
0
50
100
actions,
according
to
the
Eurocodes;
and
other
Conclusion
300
350
constructed
250
span length
200
elements;
150
Span [m]
assessment
resuming
3. BOWSTRING BRIDGES
AROUND THE WORLD
An
extensive
search
has
been
extensive
technical
and
girders.
4500
Motorway
4000
3500
Railway
3000
2500
High-speed Railway
2000
1500
Motorway/Railway
1000
Motorway/Light
Railway
500
0
0
50
Span [m]
geometric
in
Bowstring
solution
grows
4. PRELIMINARY STUDY
The Preliminary Study was based on a
constructed continuous pre-stressed concrete
box-girder deck solution with variable height,
named Bridge over the Sorraia River, in
Portugal, which is part of the A13 highway.
Having
the
layout
defined,
it
was
4.2. PRE-DESIGN
system.
Some of these elements were modified
Jersey
traffic
reservation.
separator
for
the
central
hangers).
The deck slab 30 cm thick was defined
according to the structural behaviour, use of
the bridge, deck materials and deck width.
The
The transversal beams were base on
important
Exposicin
works
in
like
the
Valencia
Puente
or
de
Pont
la
de
materials
adopted
were
the
bars
[3]
[3]
A500;
steel
grade
[4]
and fatigue
[5]
, as well as the
5. SAFETY VERIFICATIONS
Figure 4.3 Pont de lObservatoire in Belgium
reinforcing
thickness.
The
bars
rate
cracking
and
the
slab
thickness
was
the
resisting
bending
5.2. ARCH
moment,
(5.1)
5.1. HANGERS
A major challenge comes out when
To obtain the cross-section area for the
hangers the rules regarding the SLS
[4]
were
and
imposed
as
well
that
the
Nsob
ten
sob+
sob-
-499
208
753
1148
1394
1512
1536
1513
1509
1618
1977
1897
1126
882
917
1057
1192
1241
1122
761
143
-633
-1207
967
645
868
501
227
194
130
-12
288
-97
-347
-631
-603
192
739
256
-92
-357
-111
-83
296
963
1344
371
227
191
300
362
387
385
362
316
261
273
503
319
303
319
326
331
334
331
309
258
173
61
[kN]
-393
839
-217
1080
-111
1812
-56
1949
-29
1983
-37
2093
-40
2051
-26
1863
-9
2113
-14
1781
-101
1902
-159
1769
-59
841
-24
1377
-53
1975
-52
1639
-40
1431
-29
1218
-24
1341
-35
986
-59
697
-84
503
-96
198
Hanger
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Nk+
cp
Nk-
NRd
75
636
1509
1593
1592
1669
1625
1474
1787
1506
1528
1107
464
1050
1603
1261
1060
855
987
643
380
246
41
2208
2208
2208
2208
2208
2208
2208
2208
2208
2208
2208
2208
2208
2208
2208
2208
1773
1773
1773
1773
1773
1773
1773
1369
1128
396
259
225
115
157
345
95
426
306
439
1367
830
233
569
342
555
432
787
1076
1270
1575
[3]
. But, to
obtain
the
normalized
slenderness),
st
group
of
Belgian
[6]
engineers
[7]
), running a buckling
6. QUANTITIES AND
ESTIMATED BUDGET
5.2) .
and
steel
plates
and
tubes
4,594
4,969
5,164
5,194
4,86
5,118
4,966
NEd [kN]
-65852
-61021
-56804
-57325
-60722
-57148
-60135
NFE,el [kN]
302526
303215
293333
297745
295111
292482
298632
Volume
Weight
[m3/m]
[m3]
[kN/m3]
[kN]
[ton]
7,83
916
25
22892
2336
190 (8%)
684 (28%)
Steel bars
Longitudinal girders
cases.
Transversal girders
586 (24%)
843 (35%)
Arch
Hangers
65
60
55
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Motorway
Railway
High-speed
Railway
Motorway/Railway
Motorway/Light
Railway
Proposed Solution
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Span [m]
Uni
Quantity
Concrete C35/45
m3
916
kg
Uni. Cost
Total
137.354,48
190252
1,00
190.252,34
kg
1429170
5,00
7.145.848,36
kg
683652
6,00
4.101.914,34
Hangers S355
kg
83586
10,00
835.858,89
Hangers S460
kg
29122
15,00
436.829,11
12.848.057,52
The
case
study
budget
is
known
150,00
4500
Motorway
4000
3500
Railway
3000
High-speed Railway
2500
2000
Motorway/Railway
1500
1000
Motorway/Light
Railway
500
Proposed Solution
0
0
50
Span [m]
(including
solution)
7. CONCLUSIONS
8. REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
Szkely)
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
in:
http://home.uia.no/pert/backup/