Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Drainage
4.1
Introduction
The design project involved the construction of SMK Puncak Jalil at the site located near to
Faculty of Law. This project site is adjacent to the existing road leading to Faculty of Law. In this
project, we need to design sufficient drainage system to carter the quantity of runoff which will
be increase after the development due to the increase in impervious surface. Furthermore, it is
important to avoid erosion of soil, sedimentation, flash flood and other problem in future.
4.2
Scope of Works
The scopes of works involved in designing the drainage system are as follows:
i.
The setting of network and direction of flow that take into consideration of certain factors
such as contour, platform level, road level and slope that will affect the flow of the water
direction.
ii.
The estimation of the total flow rate for the whole project area.
iii.
iv.
Determination of types and sizes of drains, culvert and sumps that need to be used.
v.
4.3
Design Concept
The main concept and design of the drainage system and on site detention for this project is
based on the guidelines that had been provided by Department of Irrigation and Drainage. The
guideline being used is Manual Saliran Mesra Alam (MSMA) aligned with hydrological
procedure and rules set by local authorities. The informations from MSMA that had been taken
into consideration are as follows:
Chapter 4
Acceptance Criteria
Chapter 13
Design Rainfall
Chapter 14
Chapter 19
On-site Detention
Chapter 26
Open Drains
Chapter 27
Culvert
Surface water from drains will be channeled into the detention pond before being
discharged into the nearby river. The design of the drainage and detention pond follows the
guidelines that had been provided.
4.4
Design Procedure
4.4.1
Rational Method is the simplest method which can be used to calculate runoff. This is the most
commonly used method of determining peak discharge from small drainage areas. Peak
discharge is the greatest amount of runoff coming out of the watershed at any one time.
Step 1: Specify the catchment area (project boundary)
Step 2: Draw the drainage layout
Step 3: Divide the catchment area into several sub-catchment areas according to the particular
drainage area being considered
(DID, 1980; Chow et al. 1988; QUDM, 2007 and Darwin Harbour, 2009)
(Table 2.5 in MSMA)
For this project, 10 years ARI is adopted for the planning and design of minor storm
water system accordance with table below as this development considered commercial.
Table 4.2
Table 4.3
Table 4.4
Step 7: Input the drainage area, C value, and intensity into the rational method formula to
determine the peak rate of runoff. (Equation 14.7 in MSMA)
4.4.2
Open drain may be sized by Mannings formula using the roughness values provided in MSMA.
Step 1: Estimate Mannings n of the lining material.
n = 0.015 and n = 0.035 is selected for lined drains and grassed swales respectively.
Table 4.5
Step 2: Use design Chart 26.2 or 26.4 in MSMA to determine the flow depth, y, or use Design
Chart 26.3 to determine the minimum base width for a trapezoidal shaped grassed swale.
Estimate y from the charts or calculate manually. (In this project, we choose to calculate
manually)
Step 3: Check if y is within required limits for the open drain type. If not, adjust the drain
dimensions and return to step 2.
Step 4: Calculate the average flow velocity from V = Q/A and check that it is within the
maximum and minimum velocity criteria for the open drain type. If not, adjust the drain
dimensions and return to step 2.
Step 5: Add required freeboard to y and calculate top width of drain for drains with sloping sides.
4.4.3
On-site Detention (OSD) is a way of collecting the rain that falls on a site (known as storm
water), storing it temporarily and then releasing it slowly so that it doesnt worsen downstream
flooding
Step 1: Determine storage volume required
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
g)
4.5
Design Criteria
4.5.1
Lined Drain
i.
Geometry
The dimensions of lined open drains have been limited in the interest of public safety and
to facilitate ease of maintenance. The minimum and maximum permissible cross
sectional dimension are illustrate in figure below and described as follows.
a. Depth
The maximum depth for lined open drains shall be in accordance with Table
26.1 in MSMA
Table 4.6
Cover Condition
Maximum Depth (m)
Without protective covering
0.5
With solid or grated cover
1.0
b. Width
The width of lined open drains may vary between a minimum width of 0.5 m and
a maximum width of 1.0 m.
c. Side slope
The recommended maximum side slopes for lined open drain are indicated in
Table 26.2 in MSMA
Table 4.7
Drain Lining
Maximum Side Slope
Concrete, brickwork, and block work
Vertical
Stone pitching
1.5(H):1(V)
Grassed/Vegetated
2(H):1(V)
Figure 4.1
ii.
iii.
Freeboard
The depth of an open lined drain shall include a minimum freeboard 0f 50 mm above the
design storm water level in the drain.
4.5.2
i.
Grass Swale
Location
A grassed swale is generally located within parkland, open space areas, along pedestrian
ways, and along roadways with limited access to adjacent properties. Grassed swales
should not be provided in urban street verges with adjacent standard density residential
and commercial properties where on-street parking is permitted.
ii.
Alignment
Standardized alignment for grassed swales are provided to limit the negotiations needed
when other services are involved. In new development areas, the edge of a grass swale
should generally be located 0.5 m from the road reserve or property boundary.
iii.
Geometry
The preferred shapes for grassed swales are shown in Figure 26.2. The flow depth shall
not exceed 0.9 m. A vee shaped section will generally be sufficient for most
v.
Freeboard
The depth of a grassed swale shall include a minimum freeboard of 50 mm above the
design storm water level in the swale.
4.6
All the analysis and calculations are shown in the drawing, tables and documents attached.
4.7
Discussions
After making calculations and analysis, as well as taking into account the design criteria
that have been set by authority, the proposed drainage system for this project are as
follows:
i.
Drainage networks
a. 600 U 300 U-Shape RC Drain
b. 600 U 450 U-Shape RC Drain
c. 300 Diameter Concrete Pipe Culvert
d. 450 Diameter Concrete Pipe Culvert
e. Cascading Drain at hillside
f. Grassed Swale
ii.
Detention Facilities
The proposed OSD have optimum size to cater in 50 year peak flow rate of
the development area.