Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Agenda
Methodology
Key Findings
17
Performance Management
23
27
Sample Characteristics
36
Appendix
40
Page 2
Methodology
Research method
B2B Survey
Target population
HR Strategy:
Learning and Development:
Performance Management:
Recruitment and Selection:
70
81
77
91
respondents
respondents
respondents
respondents
Fieldwork
Back to Agenda
Page 3
Key Findings
HR Strategy
After a first quarter in which recruiting activities prevailed, in Q2 the popularity of the activities changed. Training and
professional development and specific HR logistics increased and became the activities performed by most companies.
Other main activities are recruiting and remuneration activities.
Regarding HR budgets the number of companies with medium budgets (between 5001-20000 Euro) increased (up to
4 out of 10 companies).
The spending of the budgets was more balanced, more than half of the companies succeeding to spend the
estimated budget, while only 2 out of 10 spend more than the estimated one. In the same quarter from the previous
year, the situation was reversed, most companies spending less than the estimated budget.
Training & professional development and remuneration remain the activities with the highest proportion in the
HR budget, while organizational research studies, litigations/ compensations and consultancy for human resources are the
ones with the lowest share.
Page 4
Key Findings
Performance management/ Compensations and benefits
As the seasonality of performance management indicates, the amount of these projects decreases after the first quarter of
the year.
The possibility to work from home or a flexible schedule are offered to a larger number of employees than in
Q1, while the number companies offering them remained quite similar.
Page 5
Specialists
Internal and external recruitment are used to similar
extents for this position.
Companies search externally for candidates on
recruiting sites, through internal recommendations or direct
applications.
Middle level
Senior level
Page 6
Back to Agenda
90
80
87.2
87.3
87.1 84.1
81.1
78.1
82.9
81.5
75.5
73.7
70
88.7
80.7
70.6
68.3
67.5
65.7
64.0
62.5
60
91.3
89.6
84.5
83.6
49.6
50
51.1
Performance management
41.0
40
37.1
36.0
29.2
30
27.5
22.7
27.8
20
30.2
23.2
24.0
27.0
23.9
28.9
28.3
25.4
12.6
19.3
10
Litigations/compensation
Q1/2010 (N*=32) Q2/2010 (N*=77) Q3/2010 (N*=91) Q4/2010 (N*=87) Q1/2011 (N*=44) Q2/2011 (N*=70)
*Base: Respondents that are responsible for HR strategies in their companies and who evaluated Human Resources strategy their companies
B 3. Which of the following HR activities have been conducted within your organization in the 2nd quarter/2011?
Page 8
HR Budget
Scale: 10-60!
60
51.6
49.1
50
43.7
45.0
42.0
40
40.2
40.5
36.2
36.8
32.6
30.6
30
25.4
20
23.7
22.9
23.0
20.3
0 5000 Euro
18.8
17.5
10
Q1/2010 (N*=27)
Q2/2010 (N*=53)
Q3/2010 (N*=58)
Q4/2010 (N*=60)
Q1/2011 (N*=31)
Q2/2011 (N*=48)
Page 9
60
54.1
53.9
50
47.3
43.9
42.5
40
37.9
36.9
30
29.2
31.2
28.3
24.9
20
20.6
16.7
17.8
14.8
10
Q2/2010 (N*=60)
Q3/2010 (N*=64)
Q4/2010 (N*=64)
Q1/2011 (N*=34)
Page 10
Q2/2011 (N*=60)
0%
Q2/2010
Q3/2010
Recruiting
Q4/2010
Q1/2011
Q2/2011
Q2/2010
Training and
professional
development
Performance
management
Q3/2010
Q2/2010
Q3/2010
Q4/2010
Q1/2011
Q2/2011
Q2/2010
Consultancy for
Human Resources
process and systems
development
Q3/2010
Q4/2010
Q1/2011
Q2/2011
17.6
25.5
11.5
22.4
22.6
37.7
64.0
49.8
54.9
27.6
49.6
49.1
51.9
40.5
38.7
50.5
44.9
39.2
42.2
54.9
49.7
58.3
Q4/2010
Q1/2011
62.1
7.4
20.5
9.8
Q1/2011
12.2
Q2/2011 4.6
68.8
55.2
Q4/2010
Q2/2011
Litigations/
compensation
13.6
19.3
26.5
13.5
27.6
Q3/2010
Q2/2010
1-20%
41.9
40.8
1.3
40.4
43.8
52.8
63.2
72.9
73.9
76.3
72.9
54.9
76.4
70.9
64.4
60.4
5.9
8.1
14.3
6.4
32.1
24.2
21.0
23.7
23.0
38.5
22.2
25.9
30.7
32.9
2.9
5.2
4.1
6.6
1.4
3.2
5.0
6.7
*Base: Respondents that are responsible for HR strategies in their companies and who evaluated Human Resources strategy their companies
B 1. How was the HR budget distributed in the 2nd quarter/2011 between each of the following activities? HR budget does not include the employees wages.
0%
Q2/2010
Remuneration
27.7
Q4/2010
27.2
Q2/2011
Q2/2010
Q3/2010
Specific HR logistics
31.2
Q3/2010
Q1/2011
Q4/2010
35.5
36.9
35.4
23.9
31.9
48.9
34.1
18.4
34.0
44.5
27.3
37.1
68.0
34.0
4.7
60.4
40.1
5.6
53.9
6.1
Q1/2011
38.2
50.6
11.2
Q2/2011
37.0
53.9
9.2
69.2
Q3/2010
Q4/2010
18.6
67.4
Q2/2011
45.6
41.4
52.1
Q1/2011
44.7
Q2/2011
43.8
1.7
30.8
81.4
Q1/2011
2.5
25.7
69.2
Q4/2010
Q2/2010
28.3
72.6
Q3/2010
Internal
communication
33.3
Q2/2010
Organizational
research studies
1-20%
32.6
50.4
4.0
1.5
57.0
43.4
4.5
55.3
54.2
2.0
*Base: Respondents that are responsible for HR strategies in their companies and who evaluated Human Resources strategy their companies
B 1. How was the HR budget distributed in the 2nd quarter/2011 between each of the following activities? HR budget does not include the employees wages.
Dynamics of HR budget
%
Recruiting
Q1 N*=30
15.9
44.0
5.4
Q2 N*=46
Internal communication
(%)
1st quarter/2011
2nd quarter/2011
28.1
39.8
34.4
37.9
35.5
2.4
Q1 N*=30
12.1
Q2 N*=59
12.3
50.6
24.5
38.5
12.2
3.2
18.2
15.0
7.5 12.5
5.0
Performance management
Q2 N*=38
Has
decreased
9.2 10.5
Has
increased
1.3
= %Increase %Decrease
B 2. For each of the following HR activities, would you say that, comparing to the 1st quarter/2011, in the 2nd quarter/2011, your allocated budget has increased, remained
the same or has decreased? HR budget does not include the employees wages.
Page 13
LOW POPULARITY
HIGH BUDGET
LOW POPULARITY
LOW BUDGET
HIGH POPULARITY
LOW BUDGET
Decreased/ Increased
in Q2/2011 as compared
to Q1/2011
B 1. How was the HR budget distributed in the 2nd quarter/2011 between each of the following activities? HR budget does not include the employees wages./ B 3. Which of
the following HR activities have been conducted within your organization in the 2nd quarter/2011?
Page 14
9.9
27.5
6.7
17.2
38.7
Recruiting
Q2 N*=62
Q1 N*=32
2.7
Q2 N*=65
6.3
23.9
5.8
16.1
47.0
38.2
22.7
46.9
9.8
25.2
17.8
9.8
11.8
Performance management
Q2 N*=46
Remuneration
(including bonuses)
13.8
10.2 3.7
23.5
48.8
2.8
23.4
5.6
23.0
45.2
4.0
32.4
5.8
21.8
36.0
Internal communication
Q2 N*=47
! Small bases for other
activities to allow detailed
analysis !
16.0
11.6
15.8
We
We
We
We
We
5.6
31.1
36.0
*Base: Organizations that had a HR budget in the respective quarter and conducted HR activities during this period
B 4. To what extent did you cooperate with external consultants/experts for the following activities in the 2nd quarter/2011 comparing to the 1st quarter/2011?
Top 2 boxes* %
80
Specific HR logistics
66.9
60
57.4
56.0
Performance management
52.9
55.0
45.4
40.4
40
51.7
47.0
49.2
52.1
41.2
43.2
36.1
33.4
35.8
32.4
28.9
26.8
20
Q2/2010
N**Q2/2010=48
N**Q3/2010=43
N**Q4/2010=42
N**Q1/2011=31
N**Q2/2011=47
Recruiting
36.4
Q1/2010
N**Q2/2010=67
N**Q3/2010=73
N**Q4/2010=65
N**Q1/2011=30
N**Q2/2011=61
Q3/2010
Q4/2010
Q1/2011
Q2/2011
N**Q2/2010=68
N**Q3/2010=78
N**Q4/2010=67
N**Q1/2011=38
N**Q2/2011=62
Learning and development
N**Q2/2010=69
N**Q3/2010=74
N**Q4/2010=69
N**Q1/2011=33
N**Q2/2011=64
Page 16
Back to Agenda
Learning Budget
%
80
60
40
Scale: 0-80!
56.9
62.1
57.5
50.6
50.1
49.9
49.4
43.1
42.5
<200
37.9
200 EUR or more
20
0
Q1/2010
(N*=43)
Q3/2010
(N*=63)
Q4/2010
(N*=57)
60
48.2
44.3
43.6
40
57.0
54.8
32.9
16.2
20
37.0
35.6
36.6
18.8
39.2
25.8
17.2
10.1
9.4
Q2/2011
(N*=43)
54.0
Scale: 0-60!
Q2/2010
(N*=52)
19.5
0
Q1/2010
(N*=63)
Q2/2010
(N*=69)
Q3/2010
(N*=88)
Q4/2010
(N*=74)
Q1/2011
(N*=30)
Q2/2011
(N*=65)
C 1. What was the average budget for learning and development per employee in the 2nd quarter/2011? / C 2. As compared to the first allocated budget for learning and
development in the 2nd quarter/2011, the consumed budget per employee was....
100
80
77.6
86.2
66.6
85.8
70.9
60
62.6
48.9
20
42.9
47.9
40.1
20.0
11.9
38.6
38.2
35.9
17.3
10.8
4.1
9.2
11.9
7.7
Q2/2010
(N*=86)
46.5
42.2
31.6
25.5
20.5
Q1/2010
(N*=75)
76.4
63.5
Q3/2010
(N*=117)
Q4/2010
(N*=110)
20.1
20.0
3.2
Q1/2011
(N*=50)
70.9
61.0
40
83.2
Q2/2011
(N*=81)
Scale: 50-75!
70.7
72.1
69.6
70.6
66.9
67.0
68.2
68.0
66.1
65.6
56.1
50
71.1
Q1/2010
(N*=75)
Q2/2010
(N*=86)
Q3/2010
(N*=117)
Q4/2010
(N*=110)
Q1/2011
(N*=50)
Q2/2011
(N*=81)
C 3. Which of the following methods of learning and development has been used within your organization in the 4thquarter/2010? / C 5. Which skills did you want to
develop mostly by training in the 2nd quarter/2011?
Senior Level
60
50
40
30
26.6
38.3
39.3
34.1
30.8
28.6
35.8
21.1
17.2
Classical trainings
46.6
35.7
21.9
15.0
10.2
12.4
11.0
0
6.1
80
Coaching /
mentoring
60
E-learning
50
7.7
8.1
3.2
2.9
Blended learning
MBA programs
30
20
69.5
67.3
70
40
26.7
18.7
16.9
Scale: 0-80!
53.2
46.3
20
10
Middle Level
Scale: 0-60!
70
59.6
32.9
31.1
27.8
27.9
25.4
17.3
40
30
35.9
35.2
21.2
21.8
36.2
30.4
23.1
20
10
0
18.6
6.6
16.7
11.0
4.8
27.1
26.4
16.0
1.4
22.8
22.6
16.0
3.6
17.9
14.0
14.2 14.0
23.0
14.3
1.9
Blended learning
MBA programs
Classical trainings
Training on the job
51.0
50
18.5
28.8
16.5
30.5
Entry Level
60.1
56.1
35.9
31.4
Scale: 0-60!
69.5
60
Coaching /
mentoring
64.3
Classical trainings
E-learning
35.8
Specialists Level
80
63.0
58.5
73.2
10
Scale: 0-80!
68.4
30.7
26.3
16.4
E-learning
60
47.9
50
40
33.2
33.2
31.0
30
Coaching /
mentoring
20
28.0
10.7
Blended learning
10
MBA programs
*Base: Respondents that are responsible for HR strategies in their companies and who
evaluated learning and development in their companies
9.3
6.6
28.0
31.9
22.5
17.3
13.1
8.6
4.5
39.8
21.3
16.0
31.6
2.4
26.0
13.2
5.5
10.0
18.2
Coaching /
mentoring
12.6
Blended learning
10.3
MBA programs
C 4. For what type of employees did you organize each of these learning and development programs in the 2nd quarter/2011?
7.7
5.4
Classical trainings
Outsourcing Criteria
Top 2 boxes**
Scale: 35-105!
105
100.0
97.5
95
94.3
91.1
85.9
85
92.0
85.4
84.4
81.8
74.1
75
78.9
75.9
75.2
69.9
65
64.6
58.9
55
84.8
54.0
57.1
50.5
51.7
84.2
81.6
75.0
66.9
64.7
55.1
43.1
85.6
63.8
66.4
55.8
45
94.6
60.9
62.5
51.3
35
Q1/2010 (N*=51) Q2/2010 (N*=57) Q3/2010 (N*=69) Q4/2010 (N*=66) Q1/2011 (N*=29) Q2/2011 (N*=65)
%
Usage of external funds
25
21.6
15.7
20
Scale: 0-40!
15
13.7
Yes
10
4.3
5.1
5.0
0
Q1/2010
(N*=74)
Q2/2010
(N*=82)
Q3/2010 Q4/2010
(N*=113) (N*=106)
Counts
Q1/2011
(N*=49)
Q2/2011
(N*=78)
Q2/2011
N**=15
1%-15%
20%-40%
50%-80%
100%
Performance Management/
Compensation and Benefits
Back to Agenda
Retention Techniques
T2B**%
73.0
70
62.8
57.3
Retention techniques
usage
Scale: 10-85!
73.6
57.2
50
49.3
54.4
51.6
35.7
33.3
30
29.0
26.0
70.0
Q1/2010
(N*=93)
64.1
68.8
59.2
62.0
52.4
54.5
51.2
47.1
47.9
40.5
31.0
32.1
19.9
Q2/2010
(N*=104)
Q3/2010
(N*=128)
69.3
66.5
57.2
44.9
42.5
36.3
36.8
37.4
15.1
10
75.7
78.9
74.7
34.8
31.9
28.0
Q1/2011
(N*=57)
23.7
17.8
Q4/2010
(N*=112)
Q2/2011
(N*=100)
100
Performance management
projects
Scale: 0-100!
80
60.5
52.5
60
40
40.3
32.0
36.7
47.2
Yes
20
0
Q1/2010
Q2/2010
Q3/2010
Q4/2010
Q1/2011
Q2/2011
(N*=89)
(N*=101)
(N*=128)
(N*=110)
(N*=55)
(N*=96)
*Base: Respondents that are responsible for HR strategies in their companies and who evaluated performance management/ compensation and benefits in their companies
**Top 2 boxes= 4. In a high extent + 5. In a very high extent
D 1. How much did you use the following retention techniques in the 2nd quarter/2011? / D 9. Did you implement any performance management projects in the 2nd
quarter/2011?
0%
Yes
100
100
80
80
60
60
46.7
42.5
40
35.2
39.2
44.2 38.4
40
20
20
0
Q1/2010 Q2/2010 Q3/2010 Q4/2010 Q1/2011 Q2/2011
(N*=95) (N*=102) (N*=132) (N*=115) (N*=55) (N*=93)
72.8
0.0
0.0
1.8
0.0
Q1/2010
(N*=41)
Q2/2010
(N*=38)
Q3/2010
(N*=43)
Q4/2010
(N*=32)
0%
24.8
1 - 30%
%
Q2/2011
N**=32
37.7
39.0
Yes
80
59.2
= %Increase
%Decrease
72.2
62.3
31.2
27.2
78.8
68.8
30 - 100%
3.0
Q1/2011
(N*=19)
70.3
66.6
69.0 64.7
60
40
40
20
20
29.1
Has
increased
30 - 100%
53.8
55.8
58.5
60.3
65.9
53.4
34.1
46.6
44.2
40.5
39.7
0.0
0.0
0.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
Q1/2010
(N*=70)
Q2/2010
(N*=64)
Q3/2010
(N*=81)
Q4/2010
(N*=62)
Q1/2011
(N*=31)
Q2/2011
(N*=54)
46.2
0
Q1/2010 Q2/2010 Q3/2010 Q4/2010 Q1/2011 Q2/2011
(N*=94) (N*=102) (N*=134) (N*=115) (N*=55) (N*=96)
32.7
80
60
3.6
Has
decreased
100
69.4
(%)
Q2/2011
(N*=30)
Flexible schedule
100
1 - 30%
Q1/2011
N***=34
(%)
5.3 11.8
Q2/2011
N***=56
18.2
Has
decreased
6.5
18.2
Has
increased
*Base: Respondents that are responsible for HR strategies in their companies and who evaluated performance management/ compensation and benefits in their companies
**Base: Organizations with employees that have the possibility to work from home
***Base: Organizations with employees that have the possibility of a flexible schedule
D2, D3, D4, D5, D6
Employees' Promotion
Percentage of employees
that were promoted
100
80
60
40
20
48.6
25.6
50.4
27.1
0%
60.0
51.9
49.4
29.4
26.0
45.3
27.7
20.9
25.9
22.5
19.1
18.7
27.0
24.6
1 - 5%
6% or more
0
Q1/2010 (N*=86) Q2/2010 (N*=92) Q3/2010 (N*=112) Q4/2010 (N*=93) Q1/2011 (N*=53) Q2/2011 (N*=86)
(%)
Q1/2011
N**=53
11.3
30.8
19.5
Q2/2011
N**=96
13.0
31.2
18.2
Has
decreased
Has
increased
= %Increase
%Decrease
*Base: Respondents that are responsible for HR strategies in their companies and who evaluated performance management/ compensation and benefits in their companies
(DK/NA were excluded)
**Base: Respondents that are responsible for HR strategies in their companies and who evaluated performance management/ compensation and benefits in their companies
D 7. What percentage of your employees got a promotion within your organization in the 2nd quarter/2011? / D 8. How did the rate of internal promotions change in the
2nd quarter/2011, comparing to the 4th quarter/2010?
Back to Agenda
Recruiting plan
100
74.6
80
63.0
64.7
76.9
65.3
64.9
60
Yes
40
20
0
Q1/2010 (N*=87)
Q2/2010 (N*=105)
Q3/2010 (N*=119)
Q4/2010 (N*=108)
Q1/2011 (N*=48)
Q2/2011 (N*=90)
(%)
%
Change of recruitment plan in
Q2/ 2011 vs. Q1/ 2011
Q1/2011
N**=31
60.1
Q2/2011
N**=68
33.0
47.7
34.5
6.9
17.8
53.2
29.9
=% Includes more employees %Includes less
employees
76.9
Levels of recruitment
47.3
54.0
1st quarter/2011(N=50)
61.0
45.2
44.6
18.8
Entry Level
Specialists
Middle Level
17.3
17.0
9.1
None
E 1. Did you have a recruiting plan in the 2nd quarter/2011 ? / E 2. As compared to the 1st quarter/2011, your recruiting plan for the 2nd quarter/2011.... / E 3. Which of
the following levels did you recruit in the 2nd quarter/2011 ?
Q1/2011
N*=49
47.8
31.8
Q2/2011
N*=89
46.1
37.2
It has increased
20.4
16.7
It has decreased
72.2
58.2
60
60.7
61.3
38.7
40
26.8
20.0
20
84.3
18.2
0%
1% or more
22.8
15.7
0
Q1/2010 Q2/2010
(N*=89) (N*=107)
Q3/2010 (N*=122)
Q4/2010 (N*=89)
Q1/2011 (N*=41)
Q2/2011 (N*=81)
*Base: Respondents that are responsible for HR strategies in their companies and who evaluated recruiting and selection in their companies
E 11. How did the number of your organizations employees change in the 2nd quarter/2011, comparing to the 1st quarter /2011? / E 13. Out of the total number of
employees, what percentage were hired in leasing system in the 2nd quarter/2011?
Internal Recruiting
NQ2/2011*=47
External Recruiting
NQ2/2011*=49
41.3
8.4
49.9
47.5
0%
8.8
NQ2/2011*=44
86.1
0%
44.1
1 - 99 %
3.0
1 - 30 %
10.9
31 - 100 %
100%
Count
0 Euro
0 49 Euro
50 Euro or more
Q2/2011
N*=26
22
! Small base for Q1/2011 to allow
detailed analysis !
E 5. In order to fill in the available entry level positions, in what percentage were the internal recruiting used and in what percentage were the external recruiting used in
the 2nd quarter/2011? / E 9. Within your organization, what percentage of out of the received CVs were eligible candidates (who were selected for an interview/shortlist)
for each category of open/available positions ?
81.6
76.4
Candidate's attitude
37.2
37.0
39.7
Internship
33.5
25.2
21.0
20.7
Job Fairs
20.6
20.5
15.0
6.5
33.6
30.4
22.4
Previous experience
Internal recommendations
Employment office
51.3
71.5
Previous candidates
Head hunting
59.9
Something else
11.3
6.9
3.6
Internal Recruiting
NQ2/2011*=39
External Recruiting
NQ2/2011*=42
2.2
86.5
10.1
11.3
77.5
0%
NQ2/2011*=56
89.4
0%
12.4
1 - 99 %
2.2
1 - 30 %
8.4
31 - 100 %
100%
NQ2/2011*=38
14.8
0 Euro
85.2
0-49 Euro
50 Euro or more
E 7. In order to fill in the available specialist positions, in what percentage were the internal recruiting/ promotions used and in what percentage were the external
recruiting used in the 2nd quarter/2011? / E 9. Within your organization, what percentage of out of the received CVs were eligible candidates (who were selected for an
interview/shortlist) for each category of open/available positions ? / E 12. Which were the average recruiting costs for each position in your organization in the 2nd
quarter/2011?
76.3
Previous experience
68.2
59.2
Candidate's attitude
61.9
43.0
Previous candidates
Head hunting
31.5
Recruiting agencies
Internship
72.7
28.1
56.4
43.0
22.8
22.1
10.4
8.2
4.3
Employment office
3.7
Job Fairs
1.3
1.3
Other method
2.1
Internal recommendations
7.4
6.1
5.1
Something else
3.3
Internal Recruiting
NQ2/2011*=59
External Recruiting
NQ2/2011*=64
30.5
3.8
65.3
59.7
0%
4.2
NQ2/2011*=36
84.1
0%
36.5
1 - 99 %
8.2
1 - 30 %
7.7
31 - 100 %
100%
Count
Q2/2011
N*=28
0 Euro
0 49 Euro
50 Euro or more
21
! Small base for Q1/2011 to allow
detailed analysis !
E 6. In order to fill in the available middle level positions, in what percentage were the internal recruiting/ promotions used and in what percentage were the external
recruiting used in the 2nd quarter/2011? / E 9. Within your organization, what percentage of out of the received CVs were eligible candidates (who were selected for an
interview/shortlist) for each category of open/available positions ? / E 12. Which were the average recruiting costs for each position in your organization in the 2nd
quarter/2011?
63.9
57.7
Previous experience
81.7
54.6
Candidate's attitude
48.2
51.3
41.1
Recruiting agencies
38.2
Previous candidates
31.3
Internship
Job Fairs
17.7
12.0
35.3
29.8
14.7
Internal recommendations
11.8
10.5
12.0
Employment office
6.4
5.2
4.9
4.2
Something else
3.8
Sample Characteristics
Back to Agenda
Demographics (1/3)
Region
Experience in HR field
N=129
N*=114
%
Other
25.6%
6.4
Bucharest
74.4%
More than 15
years
46.7
8-15 years
Gender
4-7 years
41.5
N=129
Male
18.1%
1-3 years
Female
81.9%
5.3
Demographics (2/3)
Form of organization
Type of company
N=129
Joint capital
16.6%
100%
Romanian
capital
31.9%
N=129
%
Public institution
Non-Governmental
Organization/ civil
society
100%
foreign
capital
51.5%
1.7
2.1
54.2
Multinational
organization
Large Romanian
company
N=117*
%
3.9
94.1
2.0
Others
22.7
17.5
1.8
Entirely Public
Entirely Private
Mix of capital(Public + Private)
Demographics (3/3)
Field of activity
Company turnover
N=93*
%
N=129
29.4
14.7
46.9
7.9
7.0
Auto industry
6.8
6.8
IT
6.5
Distribution / retail
6.2
Pharmacy / Medicine
5.7
8.7
2.7
19.8
50 000 99 000 Euro
Less than 50 000 Euro
6.6
8.3
Permanent employees
N=129
Telecom
Other
4.2
11.8
National
Corporations
46.0%
SOHO
14.0%
SME
40.0%
G 6. Which field does your organization activate in ? / G 7. Approximately how many permanent employees does your organization have? Please tick in the appropriate
interval. / G 8. Please include your organizations turnover for last year in one of the following categories:
Appendix
Detailed evolution for the main HR activities
Back to Agenda
Dynamics of HR budget in
Q2/ 2011 vs. Q1/ 2011
(%)
12.1
Q2/2011
N*=59
38.5
50.6
24.5
12.3
Has
decreased
12.2
= %Increase %Decrease
Has
increased
T2b%
100
100
80
80
60
60
40
28.8
36.4
28.9
41.2
36.1
26.8
20
0
Q2/2010
(N*=68)
Q3/2010
(N*=78)
Q4/2010
(N*=67)
Q1/2011
(N*=38)
1% - 20%
54.9
51.9
37.7
40
20
Q1/2010
(N*=28)
0%
27.6
7.4
50.5
49.6
40.5
49.1
38.7
9.8
12.2
Q4/2010
(N*=62)
Q1/2011
(N*=37)
44.9
4.6
20.5
Q2/2010
(N*=66)
Q2/2011
(N*=64)
Q3/2010
(N*=70)
Q2/2011
(N*=62)
%
Cooperation with external consultants
in Q2/ 2011 vs. Q1/ 2011
Q1/2011
N*=32
2.7
Q2/2011
N*=65
6.3
47.0
46.9
We
We
We
We
We
22.7
25.2
9.8
17.8
9.8
11.8
Specific HR Logistics
2nd Rank by Popularity: 89.6%
%
Dynamics of HR budget in
Q2/ 2011 vs. Q1/ 2011
Q2/2011
N*=38
(%)
7.5 12.5
Has
decreased
5.0
Has
increased
= %Increase %Decrease
T2b%
100
80
60
Specific HR Logistics
100
66.9
56.8
45.4
52.9
52.1
57.4
60
40
20
20
0
Q2/2010
(N*=68)
Q3/2010
(N*=78)
Q4/2010
(N*=67)
68.0
80
40
Q1/2010
(N*=28)
0%
Q1/2011
(N*=38)
27.3
4.7
Q2/2010
(N*=66)
Q2/2011
(N*=64)
1% - 20%
60.4
53.9
40.1
34.0
50.6
38.2
5.6
6.1
Q3/2010
(N*=70)
Q4/2010
(N*=62)
11.2
Q1/2011
(N*=37)
53.9
37.0
9.2
Q2/2011
(N*=62)
%
Cooperation with external consultants
in Q2/ 2011 vs. Q1/ 2011
Q2/2011
N*=60
4.0
32.4
We
We
We
We
We
5.8
21.8
36.0
Recruiting
3rd Rank by Popularity: 84.5%
%
Dynamics of HR budget in
Q2/ 2011 vs. Q1/ 2011
Q1/2011
N*=30
(%)
15.9
Q2/2011
N*=46
28.1
44.0
5.4
39.8
Has
decreased
34.4
= %Increase %Decrease
Has
increased
T2b%
100
80
60
Recruiting
42.7
40.4
47.0
55.0
100
43.2
35.8
40
20
0
Q2/2010
(N*=68)
Q3/2010
(N*=78)
Q4/2010
(N*=67)
Q1/2011
(N*=38)
62.1
55.2
60
20
1% - 20%
68.8
80
40
Q1/2010
(N*=28)
0%
25.5
19.3
17.6
26.5
64.0
49.8
Q2/2010
(N*=66)
Q3/2010
(N*=70)
Q4/2010
(N*=62)
27.6
22.4
11.5
13.6
Q2/2011
(N*=64)
13.5
Q1/2011
(N*=37)
22.6
Q2/2011
(N*=62)
%
Cooperation with external consultants
in Q2/ 2011 vs. Q1/ 2011
Q1/2011
N*=37
Q2/2011
N*=62
9.9
27.5
16.0
We
We
We
We
We
23.9
6.7
5.8
17.2
16.1
38.7
38.2
Remuneration
4th Rank by Popularity: 83.6%
%
Dynamics of HR budget in
Q2/ 2011 vs. Q1/ 2011
Q1/2011
N*=60
19.9
Q2/2011
N*=30
(%)
15.9
44.0
Has
decreased
0%
100
5.3
25.2
28.1
= %Increase %Decrease
Has
increased
1% - 20%
80
60
40
20
35.5
33.3
31.2
0
Q2/2010
(N*=66)
36.9
35.4
48.9
27.2
27.7
23.9
Q3/2010
(N*=70)
Q4/2010
(N*=62)
34.1
44.5
34.0
37.1
31.9
18.4
Q1/2011
(N*=37)
Q2/2011
(N*=62)
%
Cooperation with external consultants
in Q2/ 2011 vs. Q1/ 2011
Q2/2011
N*=56
2.8
23.4
We
We
We
We
We
5.6
23.0
45.2
Internal Communication
5th Rank by Popularity: 65.7%
Dynamics of HR budget in
Q2/ 2011 vs. Q1/ 2011
0%
100
80
60
40
20
0
50.4
45.6
4.0
Q2/2010
(N*=66)
1% - 20%
57.0
41.4
1.5
55.3
43.4
44.7
0.0
4.5
Q3/2010
(N*=70)
54.2
52.1
Q4/2010
(N*=62)
Q1/2011
(N*=37)
43.8
2.0
Q2/2011
(N*=62)
%
Cooperation with external consultants
in Q2/ 2011 vs. Q1/ 2011
Q2/2011
N*=47
11.6
We
We
We
We
We
15.8
5.6
31.1
36.0
Page 45
Performance Management
6th Rank by Popularity: 64.0%
%
Dynamics of HR budget in
Q2/ 2011 vs. Q1/ 2011
Q1/2011
N*=60
(%)
19.9
Q2/2011
N*=30
5.3
25.2
15.9
44.0
Has
decreased
28.1
= %Increase %Decrease
Has
increased
Performance Management
within the HR budget distribution
T2b%
100
80
Performance management
64.2
60
51.7
100
80
56.0
33.4
0%
49.2
32.4
54.9
60
40
39.2
20
20
5.9
40
Q1/2010
(N*=28)
Q2/2010
(N*=68)
Q3/2010
(N*=78)
Q4/2010
(N*=67)
Q1/2011
(N*=38)
Q2/2010
(N*=66)
Q2/2011
(N*=64)
1% - 20%
49.7
42.2
58.3
8.1
40.4
1.3
Q3/2010
(N*=70)
Q4/2010
(N*=62)
43.8
52.8
41.9
40.8
14.3
6.4
Q1/2011
(N*=37)
Q2/2011
(N*=62)
%
Cooperation with external consultants
in Q2/ 2011 vs. Q1/ 2011
Q2/2011
N*=46
13.8
We
We
We
We
We
10.2 3.7
23.5
48.8
Page 46
Thank You!