You are on page 1of 13

Case 2:11-cv-02425-PBT Document 1 Filed 04/07/11 Page 1 of 13

OLAS COONEY, PRO SE


S. Hicks St.

i delphia, PA 19146

4 904-6004

nickcooney@gmaiLcom

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EAS TERN DISTRICT OF PENNS YLVANIA

6
7
8

NICHOLAS COONEY, an individuaL

Plaintiff,

10

vs.
11

12
13

14

Case No.

)
)
)
)
)

COMPLAINT FOR D!MAGES

Adam Weissman, an individual; Stephanie


Wilson, an individual; Wetlands Activism
~
Collective, a business; and JOHN DOES 1-50, )
Inclusive.
)

15
16

Defendants.

17
18

1. Defamation
2. False Light

3. Intentional Infliction Of

Emotional Distress

[Unlimited Case Over 15,000.00]

)
)
)
)

19

1--------------)
20

21
22

Plaintiff Nicholas Cooney brings this suit for damages for the improper and unlawful
defamation,campaign launched against him by Defendants. In support thereof Plaintiff states the

23

following:
24
25
26

27

I. INTRODUCTION
Defendants Stephanie Wilson, Adam Weissman, and Wetlands Activism Collective have
engaged in a concerted defamation campaign which seeks to ruin the reputation of Nicholas

28

COMPUUNTFORDAMAGES

Case 2:11-cv-02425-PBT Document 1 Filed 04/07/11 Page 2 of 13

Cooney, an author and well-respected leader within the animal protection field. Defendants have
2

disseminated defamatory accusations about Mr. Cooney through word of mouth, phone, email,

web sites, internet postings, and printed flyers. Although the information spewing from these
4
5

sources is false, Mr. Cooney has suffered substantial and likely irreparable damage to his
reputation. Defendants must take responsibility for their abuse ofthe right to free speech.

It is when free speech morphs into defamation that we tum to the courts for help. Mr.
8

Cooney wants his life back; he wants to save his reputation in the court of public opinion.
9

10
II

12

II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE


1. Jurisdiction of this court arises pursuant to Article III Section 2 ofthe United States

13

Constitution, as well as 28 U.S.C. Section 1332 (a) (1) which states that "The district

14

courts shall have original jurisdiction of all civil actions where the matter in controversy

15

exceeds the sum or value of$75,000, exclusive of interest and costs, and is between ...

16

citizens of different States."

17

2. Venue is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1391 (a) (3) which states that "A civil

18

action wherein jurisdiction is founded only on diversity of citizenship may, except as

19

otherwise provided by law, be brought only in ... a judicial district in which a

20

substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred. "

21

22
23

3. This Court has personal jurisdiction over the out of state defendants based on the
Pennsylvania long-arm statute, 42 P.S. 5322, under which a court's sole inquiry is
whether the exercise of personal jurisdiction would be constitutional. Specific

24

jurisdiction is established where the non-resident defendants have purposefully directed


25

their activities at a resident of Pennsylvania and the injury arises from those activities.
26

4. Defendants' defamatory claims included directly contacting professional colleagues of


27
28

Mr. Cooney that live in Pennsylvania.


2

COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

Case 2:11-cv-02425-PBT Document 1 Filed 04/07/11 Page 3 of 13

5. Defendants' defamatory claims included contacting professional and personal colleagues


2
3

of Mr. Cooney that live in Pennsylvania via an emaillistserv.


6. Defandats' defamatory claims were made with an explicit goal of harming Mr. Cooney's

ability to sell his book, an economic activity carried out by Me Cooney in Pennsylvania

5
6

where he sells and ships books from.

7. The damage to Mr. Cooney's reputation occurs primarily in Pennsylvania, where he lives

and works as the director of an animal protection organization and as a published author.
8

See Calder v. Jones, 465 U.S. 783 (1984) and Blumenthal v. Drudge, 992 F. Supp. 44,
9

46-48 (D.D.C. 1998).


10
11

8. The amount in controversy exceeds 75,000 dollars.

12

III. PARTIES

13

14

15

9. PlaintiffNlCHOLAS COONEY (hereinafter referred to as "COONEY" or "Plaintiff') is


now and at all times herein mentioned, a natural person residing in Philadelphia, P A.

16

10.

Defendant Stephanie Wilson is a natural person who, upon information and

17
18

belief, resides at 144 Lincoln Ln., Chapel Hill, NC 27516. Defendant Adam Weissman is a

19

natural person residing in New York City, NY. Defendant Wetlands Activism Collective is a

20

non-profit business controlled by Defendant Adam Weissman that is located at 15 Thames St.,

21

Brooklyn, NY 11206.

22
23

11.

Plaintiff is unaware of the true names and capacities, whether individual,

24

corporate, associate, or otherwise, of Defendants sued herein as JOHN DOES 1-50, inclusive,

25

and therefore sues those Defendants by such fictitious names. Plaintiffwill amend this

26

complaint to allege their true names and capacities when ascertained. Plaintiff is informed and

27

believes and thereon alleges that each of the fictitiously named Defendants is legally
28
3

COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

Case 2:11-cv-02425-PBT Document 1 Filed 04/07/11 Page 4 of 13

responsible or negligent in some manner for the occurrences, acts, and omissions herein alleged,
2

and that Plaintiff s injuries and damages as herein alleged were directly and legally caused by

that negligence, willful, or intentional conduct Plaintiff is informed and believes and on that
4

basis alleges that all DOE Defendants are either residents of the State of Pennsylvania or are

subject to jurisdiction in Pennsylvania. Each reference in this complaint to Defendant,

Defendants, or a specifically named Defendant, refers also to all Defendants sued under

fictitious names.

10

11

12

13

IV. STATEMENT OF FACTS RELEVANT TO ALL CAUSES OF ACTION


12.

This case is about the defamation campaign launched against Plaintiff in an

attempt to damage his reputation so that he can no longer serve as a leader in the animal

14

protection community, a field in which he has worked for the past eight years and a field which
15

16

17

18

19

he has dedicated his life to serving.


13.

The defamation campaign launched against Plaintiff is also an attempt to harm

sales of Plaintiffs recently published book and to prevent Plaintiff from engaging in public
lectures and book sales.

20

14.

In February 2011, defendants contacted Blue Stockings Bookstore in New York

21

22

City, NY demanding they cancel a planned talk and book sale by Plaintiff Defendants asserted

23

to Blue Stockings representatives that Plaintiff abuses animals, physically abuses women, and

24

sexually assaults women. Blue Stockings Bookstore canceled the planned talk just hours before

25

the event because they did not have the ability to deal with the protest and in-store disruption of

26

the event that Defendants threatened would occur.


27

28

COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

Case 2:11-cv-02425-PBT Document 1 Filed 04/07/11 Page 5 of 13

15.
2

Defendants passed out flyers at Blue Stockings Bookstore the evening of the

planned talk asserting tharPlaintiffhad a history of sexual and physical violence against women

and violence against animals.


4

16.

Defendants' flyer reads in part: "NICK COONEY: Abuser of Animals and

Women. Nick Cooney has an ugly history of violence against women, including instances of

physical, sexual and emotional violence against partners in relationships and other activists ...

When threats have not been enough, he has followed through on those threats causing physical

10

II

12

13

harm to companion animals in an attempt to intimidate and control both partners and other
women." Defendants' flyer encouraged the public to boycott Plaintiffs book.
17.

Defendant Stephanie Wilson wrote and provided to other Defendants and to Blue

Stockings Bookstore a statement in which she alleges that, while she was dating Plaintiff in

14

2005-2006, Plaintiff raped her, threatened her on an almost daily basis, physically abused her,
15
16

encouraged housemates to threaten her as much as possible, and threatened to hurt or kill her

17

companion animals. Defendant Wilson requests in her statement that Plaintiff and the public not

18

be made aware that she is the one making these claims. Upon information and belief, this

19
.

statement was written by Defendant Wilson in or around February, 2011.

20

18.

In February of2011, Defendant Adam Weissman, operating on behalf of himself,

21

22

the Wetlands Activism Collective, and Defendant Wilson, emailed the text of the flyer and a

23

copy of Defendant Wilson's statement to mUltiple personal and professional contacts of

24

Plaintiff Recipients included Jason Del Gandio, a Temple University professor who resides in

25

Pennsylvania and who was asked by Defendants to rescind a praise quote he had issued for

26

27

Plaintiffs book. Defendants also contacted Plaintiffs publisher, Lantern Books, and upon

28

COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

Case 2:11-cv-02425-PBT Document 1 Filed 04/07/11 Page 6 of 13

information and belief asked Plaintiffs publisher to stop selling Plaintiffs book. Defendants'
2

also contacted other colleagues of Plaintiff by phone and email and made similar demands that

they stop associating with Plaintiff.


4

19.

In February of 20 11, Defendants posted the text of their flyer and similar

allegations tliat Plaintiff had sexually and physically assaulted women and physically abused

animals on the emaillistservofBlue Stockings Bookstore.

20.

In March of2011, Defendants posted the text of their flyer and similar allegations

10

that Plaintiff had sexually and physically assaulted women and physically abused animals on

11

the website http://www.defendanimalsnyc.org.This site is registered to Defendant Adam

12

Weissman and Defendant the Wetlands Activism Collective.

13

21.

Defendants posted a link to the above-mentioned web article on their personal

14

Facebook pages.
15
16

22.

In March of2011, Defendants posted the text of their flyer and similar allegations

17

that Plaintiff had sexually and physically assaulted women and physically abused animals on

18

the website http://www.supervegan.com.

19

23.

In March of2011, Defendants posted the text oftheir flyer and similar allegations

20

that Plaintiff had sexually and physically assaulted women and physically abused animals on
21

22

the animal advocacy listserv "AR-News." The AR-News listserv is a popular emaillistserv that

23

reaches over 600 animal advocates from across the United States. Emails posted to the listserve

24

are also perpetually and publicly viewable through the AR-News online listserv archive.

25

24.

Upon information and belief, Defendants have made numerous other false and

26

damaging statements about Plaintiff to many other individuals in the animal advocacy
27

28

COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

Case 2:11-cv-02425-PBT Document 1 Filed 04/07/11 Page 7 of 13

community.
2

25.

Defendant Adam Weissman and Defendant Wetlands Activism Collective have

made, among others, the following false and defamatory statements about Plaintiff:
4

a.

He has committed acts of physical violence against partners in


relationships and others

b.

He has committed acts of sexual violence against partners in relationships


and others

c.

IO

He has committed acts of emotional violence against partners in


relationships and others

II

d.

12

13

He threatened to hurt and has physically hurt companion animals in order


to coerce partners in relationships and others

14

e.

He is an abuser of animals and women

15

16

17

18

19

26.

Defendant Stephanie Wilson has made, among others, the following false and

defamatory statements about Plaintiff:


a.

He raped her

b.

He threatened her on a regular basis

c.

He threw plates at her

d.

He threatened to hurt or kill her animals

e.

He intentionally let her animals out of the house so he could chase her

20

21

22

23

24

25

around screaming at her

He encouraged his housemates to threaten her as often as possible

g.

He followed his ex-girlfriend around in a car

26

27

28

COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

Case 2:11-cv-02425-PBT Document 1 Filed 04/07/11 Page 8 of 13

h.

He'is a danger to women and anyone that gets in his way

V. FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION


4

DEFAMATION - LIBEL and SLANDER PER SE

(Against All Defendants)

27,

The allegations of paragraphs 1-26 are incorporated by reference as though

fully set forth herein.

28,

The Defendants' phone calls and emails to Blue Stockings Bookstore, Jason Del

10
11

Gandio, Lantern Press and other parties purport to be factual.

12

29.

13

to be factual.

Defendants' printed flyer distributed outside of Blue Stockings Bookstore purport

14

30.

Defendant Wilson's statement, which has been disseminated via email to

15
16

17

18

19

professional and personal contacts of the Plaintiff, purports to be factual.


31.

Defendants' postings on the AR-News listserv, Blue Stockings listserv, and on the

web sites http://www.DefendAnimalsNYC.org, http://www.SuperVegan.com, and


http://www.Facebook.com. purport to be factual.

20

32.

Defendants' statements from all of these sources were intentionally

21

22

23

24

25

communicated to third parties in person, over the phone, over email, by printed flyer, via
listservs, blogs, web sites, and web postings.
33.

Individuals who read, saw, or heard these statements, including personal and

professional contacts of Plaintiff as well as potential customers of his book and potential

26

27

professional contacts, reasonably understood them to be about Plaintiff.

28

COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

Case 2:11-cv-02425-PBT Document 1 Filed 04/07/11 Page 9 of 13

34.
2

The above-described statements convey a defamatory meaning to their audience.

They harm the reputation of Plaintiff so as to lower it in the estimation of the community and

deter third persons from associating or dealing with Plaintiff and entice further baseless claims
4

against Plaintiff.
above~described

35.

All of the

36.

It was Defendants' expectation and intent that this defamatory matter would be

statements of and concerning Plaintiff are false.

republished and further disseminated to the public at large as evidenced by their use of forums

10
11

12

13

with broad readership/viewership such as blogs, popular listservs, website~, and Facebook.
37.

Defendants' publications of these false and defamatory statements of and

concerning Plaintiff were not privileged.


38.

Defendants were notified that their publications were defamatory via cease and

14

desist letters issued by Plaintiff's attorney to Defendants on March 12, 2011. Defendants failed to
15
16

17

18

19

comply with or respond to the directives of the cease and desist letters.
39.

Defendant Stephanie Wilson published the above-described defamatory

statements with actual malice - i.e. knowledge of their falsity.


40.

Defendants Adam Weissman, Wetlands Activism Collective, and JOHN DOES

20

published the above-described defamatory statements with actual malice through a reckless
21

22

23

24

25

disregard for their falsity.


41.

As a result of Defendants' publication of these facts and defamatory statements

with actual malice, Plaintiff has suffered damages in the form ofloss to reputation, lost profits,
and increased costs.

26

42.

Defendants acted with malice [see Dun and Bradstreet, Inc. v. Greenmoss

27

28

COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

Case 2:11-cv-02425-PBT Document 1 Filed 04/07/11 Page 10 of 13

Builders, Inc., 472 U.S. 749, 105 S. Ct. 2939, 86 L.Ed.2d 593 (1985)] and engaged in highly
2

reprehensible and despicable conduct warranting punitive damages.

43.

Defendants accused Plaintiff of the serious, morally reprehensible crime of rape.

5
6

7
8

Defendants also accused Plaintiff of behavior incompatible with his profession of animal
advocacy.
44.

Accordingly, Defendants' actions constitute defamation per se and Plaintiff need

not demonstrate special damages for purpose of slander.

9
10

11

VI. SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION

12

FALSE LIGHT

13

(Against All Defendants)

14

45.

The allegations of paragraphs 1-44 are re-alleged and incorporated herein, by

15
16

17
18

19

reference.
46.

. Based on the aforementioned facts, Defendants published numerous claims about

Plaintiff that were false and would be highly offensive to a reasonable person, including that he
is a rapist, physically abuses and physically threatens women, threatens animals, and abuses

20

animals.
21
22

23

47.

These claims purport to be factual.

48.

These claims would be highly offensive to a reasonable person.

24

25

VII. THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION

26

27

INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS

28
10

COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

Case 2:11-cv-02425-PBT Document 1 Filed 04/07/11 Page 11 of 13

(Against All Defendants)


2

49.

The allegations of paragraphs 1-48 are re-alleged and incorporated by

reference herein.
4

50.

Based on the aforementioned facts, the conduct of Defendants was outrageous and

beyond the bounds of decency such that no reasonable person could be expected to endure it.

7
Plaintiff was and has been forced to endure great pain, anguish, shock, feelings of helplessness
8

and desperation with Defendants' attempts to stain Plaintiff's reputation and encourage others to

boycott his book.


10

11

12

13

51.

Defendants, and each of them, acted intentionally in conscious effort to cause

peril to Plaintiff.

52.

Defendants' conduct has had a severe, traumatic and lasting effect on Plaintiffs

14

emotional tranquility. As a proximate result of the outrageous acts of the Defendants, Plaintiff
15

16

17

18

19

has suffered severe emotional distress and a loss of and reduction of enjoyment in life.
53.

The distress created was in time and manner sufficiently substantial such that a

reasonable person of ordinary sensibilities would suffer under the circumstances.


54.

Since the time of Defendants' initial statements, Plaintiff has incurred financial

20

losses in addressing these defamatory claims including costs associated with preparation for
21

22

23

24

25

litigation of this case.


55.

As a direct and proximate result of the intentional, malicious, harmful, unlawful

and offensive acts of Defendants, as aforesaid, Plaintiff has sustained severe and serious injury
to his person, including but not limited to severe emotional distress, mental anguish and

26

suffering, and impairment of reputation and standing in the community.


27

28

11

COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

Case 2:11-cv-02425-PBT Document 1 Filed 04/07/11 Page 12 of 13

Wherefore:

AS TO THE FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION, Plaintiff prays judgment against Defendants, for
4
5

damages in excess of $75,000, in amounts according to proof:

1.

F or compensatory damages;

2.

For punitive damages;

3.

Upon a verdict or judicial finding in favor of Cooney on his defamation claim, for

9
10

11

a permanent injunction enjoining Defendants from issuing defamatory statements about Plaintiff
to others through the phone, internet, in person, or thorough any other means;

12

4.

For costs of suit incurred herein;

13

5.

For any attorneys' fees incurred herein and;

6.

For such other relief as the Court may deem just and proper.

14
15
16

17
18

19

AS TO THE SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION, Plaintiff prays judgment against Defendant, for
damages in excess of $75,000, in amounts according to proof, for:
1.

For compensatory damages;

2.

For punitive damages;

20

Upon a verdict or judicial finding in favor of Cooney on his defamation claim, for

. 3.
21

a permanent injunction enjoining Defendants from issuing defamatory statements

22
23

about Plaintiff to others through the phone, internet; in person, or thorough any other

24

means;

25

4.

For costs of suit incurred herein;

26

5.

For any attorneys' fees incurred herein and;

27

28
12

COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

Case 2:11-cv-02425-PBT Document 1 Filed 04/07/11 Page 13 of 13

6.
2

For such other relief as the Court may deem just and proper.

AS TO THE THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION, Plaintiff prays judgment against Defendant for:

1. Special damages according to proof;


4

5
6

2. Loss of enjoyment oflife, in an amount according to proof;


3. Compensatory damages, including mental anguish and suffering, personal humiliation,
and impairment of reputation and standing in the community, in an amount according to proof;
4.

Punitive damages in an amount judged appropriate by this Court;

5.

For any attorneys' fees incurred herein;

11

6.

For costs of suit incurred herein;

12

7. For such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper.

10

13

14

15
16

Dated: April 7, 2011

Respectfully Submitted By,

17

18

NICHOLAS COONEY, PRO SE

19

20

21

22

23

24

25
26

27

28

13

COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES