Soal 1

Hipotesis alternatif = Kinerja Manajemen dipengaruhi oleh Sifat Machivellian dengan

Empowerment sebagai variabel moderasi
Hipotesis null = Kinerja manajemen tidak dipengaruhi oleh sifat machivellian dengan
enpowerment sebagai variabel moderasi
a. Output

Variables Entered/Removeda
Mode Variables
Variables
Method
l
1

Entered
Perkalian,

Removed

Sifat
Machiavellia

. Enter

n,
Empowerme
ntb
a. Dependent Variable: Kinerja
b. All requested variables entered.

Mode R

Model Summary
Adjusted R

Std. Error of

l
Square Square
the Estimate
1
,597a
,357
,341
,71268
a. Predictors: (Constant), Perkalian, Sifat Machiavellian,
Empowerment

Model

Sum of

ANOVAa
df
Mean

Squares
1

Regressi

34,107

on
Residual
61,457
Total
95,564
a. Dependent Variable: Kinerja

Sig.

Square
3

11,369

121
124

,508

22,384

,000b

b. Predictors: (Constant), Perkalian, Sifat Machiavellian, Empowerment

Model

Coefficientsa
Unstandardize Standard t
Sig. Collinearity

Fraction Relative Relative

d Coefficients ized

Missing Increase Efficienc

Statistics

Coeffici
B

Std.

Info.

ents
Beta

Toler VIF

Error
1

(Constant)

ance
-

-2,770

1,273

1,278

,274

1,015 4,667

,000

,112 8,899

1,218

,348

1,952 3,503

,001

,017

-,221

,072

,003

,012

2,176

,031

Sifat
Machiavel
lian
Empower
ment
Perkalian

-2,001

3,047

58,40
3
81,12
1

a. Dependent Variable: Kinerja

Model

Coefficient Correlationsa
Perkalia Sifat
n

Empowerm

Machiavellia ent
n

Correlatio Perkalian
Sifat
ns

Machiavellian
Empowerment
Covarianc Perkalian
Sifat
es
Machiavellian
Empowerment
a. Dependent Variable: Kinerja

1,000

-,933

-,990

-,933

1,000

,906

-,990
,005

,906
-,019

1,000
-,025

-,019

,075

,086

-,025

,086

,121

Collinearity Diagnosticsa
Variance Proportions

Variance y

Mode Dimensi Eigenval

Condition

(Constan Sifat

Index

t)

on

ue

Empowerm Perkalia

Machiavellia ent

n
1

1
3,841
2
,136
3
,023
4
,001
a. Dependent Variable: Kinerja

1,000
5,322
13,012
77,417

,00
,01
,02
,98

,00
,00
,07
,93

,00
,00
,03
,97

,00
,01
,01
,98

b. Persamaan :
Y= - 2,770 + 1,278x1 + 1,218x2 0,221 x1 x2 + e
c. Karena 3 kurang dari 0 yaitu 0,221 maka Ha diterima. Jadi dapat disimpulkan bahwa
kinerja manajemen dipengaruhi oleh sifat machivellian yang dimoderasi oleh enpowerment.

Soal 2
Hipotesis = Kinerja manajemen dipengaruhi oleh sifat machivellian yang dipengaruhi oleh
empowerment
Output :

Variables Entered/Removeda
Model

Variables Entered

Sifat

Variables Removed

Method

. Enter

Machiavellianb
a. Dependent Variable: Kinerja
b. All requested variables entered.

Model Summary

Model

R Square

Adjusted R Square

Std. Error of the

Estimate

,494

,244

,238

,76656

a. Predictors: (Constant), Sifat Machiavellian

ANOVAa
Model
1

Sum of Squares

df

Mean Square

Regression

23,287

23,287

Residual

72,277

123

,588

Total

95,564

124

Sig.

,000b

39,630

a. Dependent Variable: Kinerja

b. Predictors: (Constant), Sifat Machiavellian

Coefficientsa

Model

Unstandardized

Standardized

Coefficients

Coefficients

Sig.

Collinearity

Fraction

Relative

Relative

Statistics

Missing Info.

Increase

Efficiency

Variance

Std. Error

Beta

Toleranc

VIF

e
1

(Constant)

1,153

,385

,622

,099

Sifat

,494

2,995

,003

6,295

,000

1,000

Machiavellian
a. Dependent Variable: Kinerja

Coefficient Correlationsa
Model
1

Sifat Machiavellian
Correlations

Sifat Machiavellian

1,000

Covariances

Sifat Machiavellian

,010

a. Dependent Variable: Kinerja

Collinearity Diagnosticsa
Model

Dimension

Eigenvalue

Condition Index

Variance Proportions
(Constant)

Sifat Machiavellian

1,000

1,984

1,000

,01

,01

,016

11,143

,99

,99

a. Dependent Variable: Kinerja

Variables Entered/Removeda
Model

Variables Entered

Sifat

Variables Removed

Method

. Enter

Machiavellianb
a. Dependent Variable: Empowerment
b. All requested variables entered.

Model Summary
Model

R Square

Adjusted R Square

Std. Error of the

Estimate

,359

,129

,122

1,31890

a. Predictors: (Constant), Sifat Machiavellian

ANOVAa
Model
1

Sum of Squares

df

Mean Square

31,602

31,602

Residual

213,960

123

1,740

Total

245,562

124

Regression

Sig.

18,167

,000b

a. Dependent Variable: Empowerment

b. Predictors: (Constant), Sifat Machiavellian

Coefficientsa

Model

Unstandardized

Standardized

Coefficients

Coefficients

Sig.

Collinearity Statistics

Fraction

Relative

Relative

Missing Info.

Increase

Efficiency

Variance

B
1

(Constant)

Sifat
Machiavellian

Std. Error

1,219

,663

,724

,170

Beta

Tolerance

,359

1,840

,068

4,262

,000

1,000

VIF

1,000

a. Dependent Variable: Empowerment

Coefficient Correlationsa
Model
1

Sifat Machiavellian
Correlations

Sifat Machiavellian

1,000

Covariances

Sifat Machiavellian

,029

a. Dependent Variable: Empowerment

Collinearity Diagnosticsa
Model

Dimension

Eigenvalue

Condition Index

Variance Proportions
(Constant)

Sifat Machiavellian

1,984

1,000

,01

,01

,016

11,143

,99

,99

a. Dependent Variable: Empowerment

Variables Entered/Removeda
Model

Variables Entered

Variables Removed

Empowerment,
Sifat

Method

. Enter

Machiavellian

a. Dependent Variable: Kinerja

b. All requested variables entered.

Model Summary
Model

R Square

Adjusted R Square

Std. Error of the

Estimate

,555

,308

,296

,73648

a. Predictors: (Constant), Empowerment, Sifat Machiavellian

Coefficientsa
Model

Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized

Sig.

Collinearity Statistics

Fraction

Coefficients
B
1

Std. Error

Beta

(Constant)

,948

,375

Sifat Machiavellian

,499

,102

Empowerment

,169

,050

a. Dependent Variable: Kinerja

Tolerance

VIF

2,527

,013

,397

4,913

,000

,871

1,148

,271

3,354

,001

,871

1,148

Coefficient Correlationsa
Model
1

Empowerment
Correlations

Covariances

Sifat Machiavellian

Empowerment

1,000

-,359

Sifat Machiavellian

-,359

1,000

,003

-,002

-,002

,010

Empowerment
Sifat Machiavellian

a. Dependent Variable: Kinerja

Collinearity Diagnosticsa
Model

Dimension

Eigenvalue

Condition Index

Variance Proportions
(Constant)

Sifat Machiavellian

Empowerment

2,918

1,000

,00

,00

,01

,066

6,657

,10

,05

,97

,016

13,621

,90

,94

,02

a. Dependent Variable: Kinerja

Variables Entered/Removeda
Model

Variables Entered

Variables Removed

Empowerment,
Sifat

Method

. Enter

Machiavellian

a. Dependent Variable: Kinerja

b. All requested variables entered.

Model Summary
Model

R Square

Adjusted R Square

Std. Error of the

Estimate

,555

,308

,296

,73648

a. Predictors: (Constant), Empowerment, Sifat Machiavellian

ANOVAa
Model
1

Sum of Squares

df

Mean Square

Regression

29,390

14,695

Residual

66,173

122

,542

Total

95,564

124

a. Dependent Variable: Kinerja

Sig.

27,093

,000b

b. Predictors: (Constant), Empowerment, Sifat Machiavellian

Coefficientsa
Model

Unstandardized

Standardized

Coefficients

Coefficients

Sig.

Fraction Missing

Relative

Relative

Info.

Increase

Efficiency

Variance
B
1

Std. Error

(Constant)

,948

,375

Sifat Machiavellian

,499

,102

Empowerment

,169

,050

Beta

2,527

,013

,397

4,913

,000

,271

3,354

,001

a. Dependent Variable: Kinerja

c. Karena hasil pengujian dengan sobel test menunjukan bahwa kinerja ternyata tidak
dipengaruhi oleh sifat machivellian yang dipengaruhi oleh enpowerment hal ini terlihat
darinilai p value baik Sobel, Aroian Goodman test menunjukan angka yang lebih kecil dari
alfa 5%

Soal 3
Hipotesis alternatif: Kinerja manajemen di pengaruhi oleh jenis kelamin yang dimoderasi
oleh empowerment
Hipotesis null ; Kinerja manajemen tidak dipengaruhi oleh jenis kelamin yang dimoderasi
oleh empowerment
a. Output

Variables Entered/Removeda
Model

Variables Entered

EM_JK,

Variables Removed

Empowerment,
Jenis Kelamin

Method

. Enter

a. Dependent Variable: Kinerja

b. All requested variables entered.

Model Summary
Model

R Square

Adjusted R Square

Std. Error of the

Estimate

,483

,234

,215

,77800

a. Predictors: (Constant), EM_JK, Empowerment, Jenis Kelamin

ANOVAa
Model
1

Sum of Squares

df

Mean Square

Regression

22,324

7,441

Residual

73,240

121

,605

Total

95,564

124

Sig.

,000b

12,294

a. Dependent Variable: Kinerja

b. Predictors: (Constant), EM_JK, Empowerment, Jenis Kelamin

Coefficientsa
Model

Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized

Sig.

Coefficients
B
1

Std. Error

2,777

,238

Jenis Kelamin

-1,854

,595

Empowerment

,196

EM_JK

,467

(Constant)

Beta

11,671

,000

-1,050

-3,116

,002

,053

,314

3,673

,000

,149

1,056

3,144

,002

a. Dependent Variable: Kinerja

b. Persamaan :
Persamaan 1 : KM = 2,777 + 0,966 EM 1,854 JK + 0,467 EM*JK
Persamaan 2 : KM = 2,777 + 0,196 EM

Fraction Missing

Relative Increase

Relative

Info.

Variance

Efficiency

Persamaan 3 : KM = 0,923 + 0,663 EM

c. Karena terjadi interaksi signifikan yang positif yang dpat dilihat dari koefisien EM pada
persamaan 3 yaitu 0,663 lebih positif dari peramaan 2 yaitu 0,196 maka hipoteis alternatif
diterima, yaitu kinerja manajemen di pengaruhi oleh jenis kelamin yang dimoderasi oleh
empowerment.

Soal 4
Hipotesis alternatif : Kinerja manajemen dipengaruhi oleh jenis kelamin yang dimoderasi
oleh Locus of control
Hipotesis null : Kinerja manajemen tidak dipengaruhi oleh jenis kelamin yang dimoderasi
oleh Locus of control
a. Output

Between-Subjects Factors
Value Label
Locus of Control

Jabatan

,00

Internal

64

1,00

Eksternal

61

1,00

Junior Auditor

47

2,00

Senior Auditor

34

4,00

Partner

44

Descriptive Statistics
Dependent Variable: Kinerja
Locus of Control

Jabatan

Internal

Junior Auditor

2,9475

,65113

32

Senior Auditor

3,7938

,65433

21

Partner

4,4245

,63436

11

Total

3,4791

,86084

64

Junior Auditor

2,9120

,78242

15

Senior Auditor

3,7446

,68238

13

Partner

3,8588

,87801

33

Total

3,6016

,89823

61

Eksternal

Mean

Std. Deviation

Total

Junior Auditor

2,9362

,68725

47

Senior Auditor

3,7750

,65528

34

Partner

4,0002

,85363

44

Total

3,5389

,87788

125

Tests of Between-Subjects Effects

Dependent Variable: Kinerja
Source

Type III Sum of

df

Mean Square

Sig.

Squares

29,445a

9,815

17,962

,000

1558,020

1558,020

2851,225

,000

1,111

1,111

2,033

,156

JABATAN

28,975

14,488

26,513

,000

Error

66,119

121

,546

Total

1661,023

125

95,564

124

Corrected Model
Intercept
LOC

Corrected Total

a. R Squared = ,308 (Adjusted R Squared = ,291)

Multiple Comparisons
Dependent Variable: Kinerja
(I) Jabatan

(J) Jabatan

Mean Difference (I-J)

Std. Error

Sig.

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound

Tukey HSD

Junior Auditor

Junior Auditor

-,8388*

,16643

,000

-1,2337

-,4439

-1,0641*

,15507

,000

-1,4320

-,6961

,16643

,000

,4439

1,2337

-,2252

,16879

,379

-,6258

,1753

Junior Auditor

1,0641*

,15507

,000

,6961

1,4320

Senior Auditor

,2252

,16879

,379

-,1753

,6258

-,8388*

,16643

,000

-1,2429

-,4348

,15507

,000

-1,4405

-,6876

,8388*

,16643

,000

,4348

1,2429

-,2252

,16879

,554

-,6350

,1846

Senior Auditor
Partner
Senior Auditor

Upper Bound

Junior Auditor

,8388

Senior Auditor
Partner
Partner

Partner
Bonferroni

Junior Auditor

Junior Auditor
Senior Auditor
Partner

Senior Auditor

Junior Auditor

-1,0641

Senior Auditor
Partner

Partner

Junior Auditor

1,0641*

,15507

,000

,6876

1,4405

Senior Auditor

,2252

,16879

,554

-,1846

,6350

Partner
Based on observed means.
The error term is Mean Square(Error) = ,546.
*. The mean difference is significant at the ,05 level.

Kinerja
Jabatan

Subset
1

Tukey HSD

a,b,c

Junior Auditor

47

Senior Auditor

34

3,7750

Partner

44

4,0002

Sig.

2,9362

1,000

,356

Means for groups in homogeneous subsets are displayed.

Based on observed means.
The error term is Mean Square(Error) = ,546.
a. Uses Harmonic Mean Sample Size = 40,863.
b. The group sizes are unequal. The harmonic mean of the group sizes is used. Type I
error levels are not guaranteed.
c. Alpha = ,05.

c. Berdasarkan pengujian dengan ANOVA pada tabel test Between-Subject Effects tampak
bahwa interaksi Jabatan*Loc memiliki nilai F =