Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bee Thao
Wofford
ENG 112-098
04 April 2002
Mass murders and violent crimes are becoming a greater concern for many Americans.
When researchers try to explain why these violent crimes are being committed, they place the
blame upon the media’s portrayal of gratuitous violence. However, this may not be the case.
Senator John McCain and Clayton Cramer explain how the explicit and gratuitous violence
portrayed by the media allows violence to perpetuate, whereas Judith Levine and Tracy Zupancis
McCain and Cramer contend that media allows violence to perpetuate. Even though
there is a consensus as to the ability of the media to cause violence, the degree to which the
The consensus is that the media allows violence to perpetuate. In his press release, Sen.
McCain states that the entertainment media is “bombarding” Americans with “violent images
and messages”. This bombardment is evident when Cramer describes the mass murders that
several men performed and the correlation to Time and Newsweek magazines. This correlation
describes magazines filled with pictures of murders and murder weapons, namely automatic
weapons, which appeared in the homes and possession of mass murderers. Further examples of
this include the “Seven Deadly Days” article, which ran in Time, showing pictures containing the
Even with this consensus of the role that the media plays in supporting violence, the
degree to which the media perpetuates violence is contested. Sen. McCain refers to the “[s]cores
of studies, hearings, and protests of angry and fearful parents” when he says:
“[T]he multimedia onslaught our children are exposed to every day is doing real harm,
reasonable way to settle disputes, and increasing the likelihood that life will tragically
imitate art.”
However, Sen. McCain also states that this “outbreak of [. . .] violence is a complicated
phenomenon”. Clayton, however, dismisses these complications and focuses on solutions to “the
problem of unintentionally promoting mass murder” through more ethical regulations of the
Even though there is disagreement, the search for a solution is held by both and
“But like much of the American public, who have increasingly been focusing on the role
of the entertainment industry in this tragic story, we believe that media violence is
contributing to this problem, and that we need the help of the entertainment community
Whereas Sen. McCain and Cramer saw the media promoting violence, Levine and
Zupancis provide evidence that the media is not entirely at fault. Levine takes a more pragmatic
stand in explaining the futility of censoring the media while Zupancis reports upon the solutions
In “Shooting the Messenger: Why Censorship Won’t Stop Violence”, Levine explains
that violence is caused by “a multiplicity of interrelated social, cultural, familial and cognitive
Thao 3
factors” (Eron and Huesmann qtd. in Levine). The factors that can lead to violence include
family dysfunction, poverty, poor education, failure to communicate, gender, age, and mental
handicaps. Levine also explains that censorship of mass media can increase the likelihood that
Americans will become more displaced in society and have a greater disdain for authority and
law, giving the example of prohibition in the 1920s to prove this point. She continues in saying
that the media is only being used as a “scapegoat”, offering instead, that parents provide greater
guidance to their children, the implementation of rating systems to assist parents in appropriate
media, as well as increased discussion among citizens to solve the problems of the society.
These solutions are what Zupancis discusses in her article, which reports on a symposium
designed to open the lines of communication among American youth. Open lines of
communication will allow children to learn from adults and to decide what is an appropriate
“[W]e are suffering an epidemic of blindness. Blindness as to the real nature and cause
of youth violence[. . . .] Blindness to its basic humanity, its roots in real human causes
rather than sensationalized causes, and so blindness in the face of our retributive urges --
Zupancis also implies that there is a general call for all citizens to cooperate, open dialogue, and
focus “on a multiplicity of solutions that incorporate the community in order to prevent youth
violence”.
Each author has an opinion vastly different from the other as to the cause of violence in
America, but all of these authors agree on the need for a solution. The cause of violence is a
complex issue that cannot easily be solved, nor can an answer easily be given to stop violence.
Thao 4
However, many would agree that there is a need to stop violence. Senator McCain, Cramer,
Works Cited
Cramer, Clayton. “Ethical Problems of Mass Murder Coverage in the Mass Media.” Journal of
Levine, Judith. “Shooting the Messenger: Why Censorship Won’t Stop Violence.” Media
shooting_the_messenger.htm>.
Magnuson, E., J. Leviton and M. Riley. “Seven Deadly Days.” Time 17 July 1989. 30-60.
“McCain Joins Lawmakers in Calling on White House to Convene Media Violence Summit.”
~mccain/mediawh.htm>.
Zupancis, Tracy. “Symposium Seeks to Combat Youth Violence Through Dialogue.” The Hoya
news3.htm>.