Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A 6 m model of a 180 m long ship is towed in a model basin at a speed of 1.61 m/s. The towing pull is 20 N.
The wetted surface of the model is 4 m 2. Estimate the corresponding speed for the ship in knots and the
effective power PE, assuming resistance coefficients to be independent of scale for simplicity.
Solution
The scale is:
Ls 180
30
Lm
6
Vm
1.61
0.21
g Lm
9.81 6
Fn
8.824
17.15 kn.
0.5144
A simple scaling law assumes that the resistance coefficients remain constant. (More accurate prediction
methods have a slight speed dependence of the frictional resistance coefficient and introduce a correlation
coefficient.) Then:
1 kn = 0.5144 m/s. Thus the speed of the full-scale ship is Vs
cT
1
2
RT , m
20
1
541 kN
2
Vm S m 2 1000 1.612 3600
L13 1
L32 2
L1 3 1
L2 3 2
V1
gL1
V2
gL2
L
V2 V1 2 V1 2
L1
1
1/ 6
14000
15000
20
1/ 6
19.8 kn
Vm
V
s
gLm
gLs
Vm Vs
Lm
7
15
3.35 kn = 1.73 m/s
Ls
140
Vm
V
s
gLm
gLs
Vm Vs
Lm
6
18
4.02 kn = 2.07 m/s
Ls
120
2
The effective power follows from PE = RV. The resistance is expressed as R c 12 V A ; thus
it scales with 3, as the area scales with 2 and the speed in Froude similarity scales with 0.5. Thus
the power scales with 3.5:
PE , s Ls
PE , m Lm
3.5
120
3.5
35777
16
17
18
19
2420 3010 3740 4620
20
5710
Estimate the power requirements for a similar ship with 16250 t displacement at speed 19.5 knots.
Solution
We convert the speed of the new ship of 19.5 kn to the corresponding speed for the original ship, following
Froude and geometric similarity:
1/ 6
1/ 6
gL1
1
8700
V1 V2
V2
19.5
17.57 kn
gL2
16250
2
For this speed, the power for the original ship is linearly interpolated to:
3740 3010
P1 (17.57 17)
3010 3426 kW
18 17
This is scaled to the new ship:
new
old
P P1
3.5 / 3
16250
8700
3426
3.5 / 3
7088 kW
Explanation: Power scales with speed V3 and area A, which gives for the speed with Froude similarity a scale
with length scale 1.5 and for the area 2, thus together 3.5. If we use the displacement instead of the length,
we divide by 3. Hence the exponent of 3.5/3.
Compute the necessary power for car speeds of 10, 20, 30, 40, 100 and 200 km/h.
What scale has to be taken to get a ship model of same mass as the car?
What is the model speed if Froude similarity is kept?
What is the model resistance if the correlation allowance is cA = 0?
How fast could the car go with the same power the ship model needs in towing at design Froude
number?
F CW
air 2
V A
2
2.78 m/s
5.56 m/s
8.3 m/s
11.11 m/s
27.78 m/s
55.60 m/s
F
2.85 N
11.39 N
25.63 N
45.60 N
284.72 N
1138.9 N
P = F V
8W
63 W
212 W
506 W
7910 W
63272 W
1/ 3
16500
s
23.957
1.2
m
Then the model length is:
L
190
Lm s
7.93 m
23.957
c) The ship speed is:
Vs 25 0.5144 12.861 m/s
The Froude number of the ship is:
Vs
12.861
Fn
0.298
gLs
9.81 190
Model and full-scale ship have the same Froude number, thus:
Vm Fn gLm 0.298 9.81 7.93 2.63 m/s
d) First, we compute the Reynolds numbers of ship and model:
V L 12.861 190
Rn , s s s
21 108
sea
1.16 10 6
V L
2.63 7.93
Rn , m m m
18.3 106
6
fresh
1.14 10
The frictional resistance coefficients are:
0.075
0.075
1.398 10 3
2
log10 Rn, s 2 log10 21 108 2 2
0.075
0.075
2.708 10 3
2
log10 Rn, m 2 log10 18.3 106 2 2
cF , s
cF , m
cT , s
RT , s
2 106
1
1
5.357 10 3
2
2
V S
1026 12.86 4400
2 sea s s
2
We assume the same wave resistance coefficient for full scale and model scale. Thus:
cT , m cF , m cF , s cT , s ( 2.708 1.398 5.357) 10 3 6.676 10 3
2
This yields a resistance (with S m S s / ):
RT ,m cT ,m
m 2 Ss
1000
4400
Vm 2 6.676 10 3
2.63 2
177 kN
2
2
23.957 2
P CW
air 3
P
465.5
V Am V 3
3
10.8 m/s
1
2
CW 2 air A
0.3 12 1.23 2
= 38.9 km/h
[m/s] 0.5
0.6
0.75
[N] 0.402 0.564 0.867
0.85
1.114
1.0
1.1
1.584 2.054
1.2
2.751
We consider only the lowest 4 speeds as for the others a considerable wave influence is to be expected.
a) We compute the total resistance coefficient of the model, using Fn V / gL , Rn V L / ,
cF , 0 0.067 /(log10 Rn 2) 2
Vm
0.50 m/s
0.60 m/s
0.75 m/s
0.85 m/s
RT,m
0.402
0.564
0.867
1.114
Fn
0.146
0.175
0.219
0.248
Rn105
5.24
6.29
7.86
8.91
cF0 103
4.843
4.643
4.415
4.295
cT 103
7.532
7.338
7.219
7.222
cT/cF0
1.555
1.580
1.635
1.681
Fn4/cF0
0.091
0.197
0.507
0.859
Then regression analysis (e.g. using a spreadsheet like Excel) yields = 0.165 and k = 0.545.
(If only the last 3 points are used, = 0.190, k = 0.540.)
2
b) We compute now: cF 0.075 /(log10 Rn 2)
Vm
0.50
0.60
0.75
0.85
RT,m
0.402
0.564
0.867
1.114
Fn
0.146
0.175
0.219
0.248
Rn105
5.24
6.29
7.86
8.91
cF 103
5.422
5.198
4.943
4.807
cT 103
7.532
7.338
7.219
7.222
cT/cF
1.389
1.412
1.461
1.502
Fn4/cF
0.082
0.176
0.453
0.768
cT
F4
(1 k ) n
cF
cF
Regression analysis yields = 0.189 and k = 0.376. The form factor differs from Hughes-Prohaska,
as the ITTC'57 line considers already to some extent a form influence.
Lm = 1.5 m,
Vm = 30 m/s,
T = 25C.
The density and viscosity of air at standard atmospheric pressure are (as function of temperature):
273
1.293
kg/m3
T 273
= 105(1.723+0.0047T) kg/(ms)
where T is the temperature in C.
The model resistance measured in the wind tunnel is 3.9 N. The full-scale vehicle is 9 m long and operated
in the ocean at 15C, = 1.19106 m2/s, = 1026 kg/m3.
a) What similarity law is most important and what full-scale speed in m/s corresponds to keeping this
law?
b) What is the full-scale resistance at this speed (using same total resistance coefficient)?
c) Predict the full-scale resistance following ITTC'78 assuming c AA = cA = 0 for full-scale speed 2 m/s?
d) Can the accuracy of prediction be improved by changing the temperature in the wind tunnel? How?
Solution
a) For an underwater vehicle, wave resistance (and thus Froude similarity) can be neglected. Thus
Reynolds similarity is most important. Same Reynolds number then yields the full-scale speed:
273
273
m 1.293
1.293
1.1845 kg/m3
T 273
25 273
m 10 5 1.723 0.0047 T 105 1.723 0.0047 25 105 1.8405 kg/(ms)
Rn , m
m 10 5 1.8405
1.5538 10 5 m2/s
m
1.1845
V L
30 1.5
m m
2.896 106
m
1.5538 10 5
cT
1
2
Rm
3.9
1
6.097 10 3
2
2
Vm Sm 2 1.1845 30 1.2
Ls
9
1.2
43.2 m2
1.5
Lm
Thus the resistance at full scale (assuming same resistance coefficient) is:
1026
RT cT Vs2 S s 6.097 10 3
0.38292 43.2 19.8 N
2
2
S s S m
cT (1 k ) cF
0.075
0.075
cF
3.767 10 3
2
2
6
log10 Rn 2 log10 2.896 10 2
cT
6.097 10
1.6185
cF 3.767 10 3
Thus, we have the resistance at 2 m/s:
1 k
Vs Ls
29
15.12 106
6
s
1.19 10
0.075
0.075
cF
2.795 10 3
2
2
6
log10 Rn 2 log10 15.12 10 2
Rn
Vs S s 4.52 10
2 43.2 401 N
d) Reducing the temperature increases the Reynolds number. However, to get the same Reynolds
number in this case would require a temperature of 163C...
S m L2m
S s L2s
Sm Ss
L2m
4.9 2
3300
4.043 m2
2
2
Ls
140
9.078 10 8
6
s
1.19 10
This yields friction resistance coefficients following ITTC'57:
0.075
0.075
c F ,m
3.267 10 3
2
2
6
log10 Rn 2
log10 6.189 10 2
0.075
0.075
c F ,s
1.549 10 3
2
2
8
log10 Rn 2
log 10 9.078 10 2
The total resistance of the model follows from the model test:
Rn , s
cT , m
RT ,m
1
2
mV S m
2
m
1
2
19
4.533 10 3
2
1000 1.44 4.053
The wave resistance coefficient (assumed same for model and ship) is then:
c w cT ,m c F ,m 4.533 10 3 3.267 10 3 1.266 10 3
Thus the total resistance coefficient of the ship is:
cT , s c F , s c w c A (1.549 1.266 0.4) 10 3 3.215 10 3
The resistance follows:
RT , s cT ,s
s 2
1025
Vs S s 3.215 10 3
7.716 2 3300 323.7 kN
2
2
Ls Lm 23 7.187 165.30 m
Vs
Vm
S s S m 23 10.761 5645 m2
The Reynolds numbers for model and full scale are:
2
Vm Lm 2.064 7.187
1.301 107
6
m
1.14 10
V L
9.899 165.3
s s
1.375 109
s
1.19 10 6
Rn , m
Rn , s
0.075
0.075
2.867 10 3
2
2
7
log10 Rn 2 log10 1.301 10 2
0.075
0.075
1.472 10 3
2
2
9
log10 Rn 2 log10 1.375 10 2
cF , m
cF , s
m 2
1000
Vm S m 2.867 10 3
2.064 2 10.671 65.2 N
2
2
1025
cF , s s Vs2 S s 1.472 10 3
9.899 2 5645 417.2 kN
2
2
RF ,m c F ,m
RF , s
k
c A 10 3 105 3 s 0.64 10 3 105 3 10 6 0.64 0.41 10 3
Loss
The total resistance coefficient of the model and the model is:
cT , m
1
2
RT , m
104.1
1
4.580 10 3
2
2
mVm S m 2 1000 2.064 10.671
The total resistance coefficient of the full-scale ship follows then according ITTC'78:
cT , s (1 k )(cF , s cF , m ) cT , m c A (1 0.12)(1.472 2.867) 4.580 0.41 3.427 10 3
RT ,s cT , s
s 2
1025
Vs S s 3.427 10 3
9.899 2 5645 971.4 kN
2
2
k
c A 10 3 105 3 s 0.64 10 3 105 3 10 5 0.64 1.622 10 3
Loss
RT ,s cT , s
s 2
1025
Vs S s 4.640 10 3
9.899 2 5645 1315 kN
2
2
Ls Lm 23 7.187 165.3 m
Vs
Vm
S s S m 23 10.761 5645 m2
2
Thus:
Vm Lm 2.064 7.187
1.301 107
m
1.14 10 6
V L
9.899 165.3
Rn , s s s
1.375 109
6
s
1.19 10
0.075
0.075
cF , m
2.867 10 3
2
2
7
log10 Rn, m 2 log10 1.301 10 2
Rn , m
0.075
0.075
1.472 10 3
2
2
9
log10 Rn, s 2 log10 1.375 10 2
1000
RF , m cF , m m Vm2 S m 2.867 10 3
2.0642 10.671 65.1 N
2
2
s 2
1026
RF , s cF , s Vs S s 1.472 10 3
9.8992 5645 417.7 kN
2
2
cF , s
cR , m
1
2
RR , m
39
1
1.718 10 3
2
2
m Vm Sm 2 1000 2.064 10.671
RR , s cR , s
s 2
1026
Vs S s 1.78 10 3
9.899 2 5645 487.5 kN
2
2
3
3
Total resistance coefficient: cT , s cF , s cR , m c A (1.472 1.718 0.2) 10 3.390 10
Total calm-water resistance at full scale:
RT , s cT , s
s 2
1026
Vs S s 3.390 10 3
9.8992 5645 962.9 kN
2
2
L
S s Ls
S s S m s
S m Lm
Lm
The Reynolds numbers are:
130
5
2347 m2
Vm Lm
1.8 6
9.47 106
m
1.14 10 6
V L
8.38 130
s s
9.15 108
6
s
1.19 10
Rn , m
Rn , s
0.075
0.075
3.028 10 3
2
2
6
log10 Rn, m 2 log10 9.47 10 2
0.075
0.075
1.548 10 3
2
log10 Rn, s 2 log10 9.15 108 2 2
cF , m
cF , s
The total resistance coefficient of the model follows from the model test:
cT , m
RT , m
70
1
8.642 10 3
2
2
1
V S
1000 1.8 5
2 m m m
2
The wave resistance coefficient (assumed same for model and ship) is then:
cw cT , m cF , m (8.642 3.028) 10 3 5.614 103
Thus the total resistance coefficient of the ship is:
cT , s cF , s cw c A (1.548 5.614 0.35) 103 7.511 103
The resistance follows:
RT , s cT , s
s 2
1026
Vs S s 7.511 10 3
8.382 2347 635.1 kN
2
2
1/ 3
1/ 3
The wetted surface may be estimated by an empirical estimate: S 3.4 0.5 Lwl
L pp ,1
L pp ,O
150
1.1719
128
We have:
VO L pp ,O
8.7448 128
9.406 108
6
1.19 10
V1 L pp ,1 9.467 150
Rn ,1
1.193 109
6
1.19 10
0.075
0.075
cF , O
1.5423 103
2
2
8
log10 Rn,O 2 log10 9.406 10 2
Rn ,O
cF ,1
0.075
0.075
1.4976 10 3
2
2
9
log10 Rn,1 2 log10 1.193 10 2
2
3 1026
2
RF , O cF , O
VO SO 1.5423 10
8.7448 3761.9 227.6 kN
2
2
1026
RF ,1 cF ,1 V12 S1 1.4976 10 3
9.467 2 5166.4 355.7 kN
2
2
The residual resistance is RR RT RF . Thus:
RR ,O RT ,O RF , O 460 227.6 232.4 kN
Then:
RR ,1 RR , O 3 232.4 1.17193 374.0 kN
and
s
f
W
D
J
n
KT
V
R
0
1026
1.13910-6
1.18810-6
0.135
4.5
0.833
3
0.1594
13
0.95
0.684
kg/m3
m/s2
m/s2
m
1/s
m/s
a) The ship resistance at design speed is 580 kN. The ship is at constant speed. What is the thrust
deduction fraction t?
b) Give an estimate for the propulsive efficiency D.
c) For a 1:16 model of the ship a wake fraction w = 0.19 is measured in towing tank tests. What should
be the propeller rpm at the model speed corresponding to full-scale design speed?
d) Compare Reynolds numbers at 0.7R for the model and at full scale. The full-scale propeller chord c
at r/R = 0.7 is 2 m.
Solution
a) The propeller thrust follows from:
T (1 t ) RT
t 1
RT
580
1
0.04
T
603.5
1.111
Hull efficiency: H
T VA
603.5 11 .245
Propulsive efficiency: D 0 R H 0.684 0.95 1.111 0.72
c) Similarity laws give:
Vs
Vm
Vm
Vs
13
3.25 m/s
16
11.2 Hz
J Dm J ( Ds / ) 0.833 (4.5 / 16)
Thus the model propeller turns at 674 rpm.
d) Circumferential velocity at r/R=0.7: VR V A2 (0.7nD ) 2
At full scale:
VR ,s
At model scale: V R ,m
VR c
VR , s c s
31.75 2
56 10 6
At full scale: Rn , s
s
1.139 10 6
VR ,m c m 7.4 ( 2 / 16)
0.78 10 6
At model scale: Rn ,m
6
m
1.188 10
Reynolds number: Rn
The model scale Reynolds number is close to the point where laminar/turbulent transition is
expected. Unless turbulence is stimulated, some contamination due to partially laminar flow may be
expected.
p1
p2 0.7028423 p1
Lpp [m]
S [m2]
[t/m3]
[m2/s]
b) Fn
Model
5.6
8.16
0.9983
1.002106
Full scale
140
5100
1.026
1.190106
V
V L
Rn
and
and 1 kn = 0.5144 m/s. Then we have:
gL pp
Vm [kn]
2.4
2.6
2.8
2.9
3.0
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
Vm [m/s]
1.235
1.337
1.440
1.492
1.543
1.595
1.646
1.698
1.749
Fn
0.1666
0.1804
0.1943
0.2013
0.2082
0.2151
0.2221
0.2290
0.2360
Rn,m106
6.900
7.475
8.050
8.337
8.625
8.912
9.200
9.487
9.775
Vs [m/s]
6.173
6.687
7.202
7.459
7.716
7.973
8.230
8.488
8.745
Vs [kn]
12.0
13.0
14.0
14.5
15.0
15.5
16.0
16.5
17.0
Rn,s106
778.1
842.9
907.8
940.2
972.6
1005.0
1037.4
1069.9
1102.3
c) cT , m
cF , m
RT , m
1
Vm2 S m
2 m
0.075
log10 Rn, m 2 2
cR cT , m cF , m
Vm [kn]
2.4
2.6
2.8
2.9
3.0
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
RT [N]
23.24
28.38
33.92
37.53
41.47
44.79
47.49
52.13
58.71
cT,m103
3.744
3.895
4.014
4.141
4.275
4.324
4.303
4.442
4.712
cF,m103
3.203
3.158
3.116
3.097
3.079
3.061
3.044
3.028
3.012
cR103
0.540
0.738
0.898
1.043
1.197
1.264
1.259
1.414
1.700
d) cT , s cF , s cR c A
0.075
cF , s
log10 Rn, s 2 2
RT , s cT , s
s 2
Vs S s
2
Vs [kn]
12.0
13.0
14.0
14.5
15.0
15.5
16.0
16.5
17.0
cF,s103
1.579
1.564
1.549
1.542
1.536
1.530
1.524
1.518
1.512
cT,s103
2.420
2.602
2.747
2.886
3.033
3.094
3.083
3.232
3.513
RT [kN]
242.2
304.4
372.7
420.1
472.0
514.6
546.4
609.2
702.9
R 10 V 2 185 V 1100
a) What is the required thrust?
b) At what points (J, KT, KQ, 0) does the propeller operate assuming P/D = 0.8, 0.9, 1.0, 1.1, and 1.2,
respectively?
c) What propeller P/D would you chose? What are the corresponding open-water efficiency, torque and
delivered power of the engine?
d) What are then delivered power and open-water efficiency at Vs = 12 kn?
Use the file Wageningen_B4-40.pdf to find the solution.
Solution
a) Resistance at Vs = 15 kn: R 10 V 2 185 V 1100 10 152 185 15 1100 575 kN
Thrust at Vs = 15 kn:
RT
575
718.85 kN
1 t 1 0.2
KT
T
n2 D 4
VA
nD
KT
T
718.75
0.453 KT 0.453 J 2
2
2
2
2
2
J
VA D 1.025 6.559 6
We compute a characteristics curve:
J
K
0.90
0.367
Now we plot this function in the diagram for the B4-40 propeller. The intersections of this KT = f(J)
curve with the KT curves of the propeller for the various P/D values (solid lines) gives
(approximately taken from the diagram) J and KT. The corresponding values of 0 and 10KQ for this
J are listed as well:
P/
D
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.2
KT
10KQ
0.570
0.620
0.665
0.705
0.745
0.147
0.174
0.200
0.225
0.251
0.150
0.265
0.330
0.400
0.475
0.620
0.630
0.635
0.630
0.625
c) The best efficiency is for P/D = 1.0 with 0 = 0.635. So we select this propeller. The propeller rpm
follows from:
VA
V
6.559
n A
1.64 s-1 = 98.6 rpm
nD
J D 0.665 6
2
5
2
5
Torque follows from: Q K Q n D 0.033 1025 1.64 6 707 kNm
The necessary delivered power follows from: PD 2 n Q 2 1.64 707 7285 kW
J
KT,12
0.55
0.119
This yields:
KT
10KQ
0.690
0.188
0.405
0.650
VA
5.247
0.90
0.319
= 117.20 m
rb
Lwl
B
= 120.00 m
= 20.00 m
CB
lc
b
= 0.688
= 0.0 m
= 6.56 m
Wake fraction and thrust deduction are estimated by: w 0.75 CB 0.24 and t 0.5 C B 0.15
Viscosity and density are: = 1.1910-6 m2/s, sea = 1025 kg/m3
The ship is equipped with a propeller with 0 = 0.55. The relative rotative efficiency is R = 1.
a) What is the power requirement before conversion?
b) What is the power requirement after conversion, if the propeller is assumed to remain unchanged?
Base your prediction on Lap-Keller1, with correlation coefficient c A 0.35 103 .
Solution
a) Considerations for the original hull
The displacement is: CB L pp B T 0.688 117 .20 20.00 6.56 10579 m3
The wetted surface following Keller (1973) is:
S (3.4 1 / 3 0.5 L pp ) 1 / 3 (3.4 105791 / 3 0.5 117 .20) 105791 / 3 2925 m2
The midship section area is:
Am B T rb2
2 20.00 6.56 1.5 2
2 130.20 m2
2
Thus Cm
C
0.688
Am
130.20
0.692 .
0.9926 and C P B
CM 0.9926
B T 20 6.56
CP = 0.692 and lcb = 0 make this ship a group C ship according to Keller's (1973) Figure 1.
The calculation length for Lap-Keller is Ld 1.01 L pp 1.01 117 .20 118 .37 m.
( Ld Lwl for Lwl 1.01L pp , but this is not the case here.)
The prismatic coefficient based on this length is CPd = CP/1.01 = 0.685.
The speed is V = 15.6 kn = 8.025 m/s.
The Reynolds number is: Rn
cF following ITTC'57 is: cF
7.983 108
6
1.19 10
0.075
0.075
1.574 10 3
2
2
8
log10 Rn 2 log10 7.983 10 2
Lap, A.J.W. (1954). Diagrams for determining the resistance of single screw ships. Int. Shipb. Progr., p.179; Keller, W.H. auf'm (1973). Extended
diagrams for determining the resistance and required power of single-screw ships. Int. Shipb. Progr., p.253
cR
Am
130.20
r
0.025 1.111 10 3
S
2925
20.00
K 2 1 0.05
2.4 1 0.05
2.4 1.032
T
6.56
1025
RT c F c R c A K 2 V 2 S 1.574 1.111 0.35 1.032
8.025 2 2925
2
2
= 302 kN
PE RT V 302 8.025 2424 kW
w 0.75 CB 0.24 0.75 0.688 0.24 0.276
t 0.5 CB 0.15 0.5 0.688 0.15 0.194
1 t
1 0.194
H
1.113
1 w 1 0.276
PD
PE
2424
3960 kW
H 0 R 1.113 0.55 1
b) Considerations after ship conversion (We denote values for the new version by a prime.)
The new length is L' pp L pp L 117 .20 12.50 129.70 m.
Thus L'd 1.01 L' pp 1.01 119 .70 131.00 m.
' Am L 10579 130.2 12.50 12206.5 m3
12206.5
C 'B
0.710
L'B T 131 20 6.56
C 'P
C 'B
0.710
1.124
1 w' 1 0.293
The other data remain unchanged. (The relative rotative efficiency is largely influenced by the
aftbody shape and the propeller. Both do not change here, so the assumption of unchanged R is
acceptable.) We now use Keller's (1973) Figure 5.
8.834 108
1.554 103
Rn
cF
V/
C 'Pd L'd
0.833
r
cR
(cF+cA+cR) K2
0.0285
1.126 103
3.127 103
RT
PE
P
340 kN
2730 kW
4416 kW