Professional Documents
Culture Documents
List of symbols
d
Ip
m
L
p
P
PR
i
v
vC
Va
Vp
x
f
l
o
oe
DV
N
t
r IEE, 2005
IEE Proceedings online no. 20045134
doi:10.1049/ip-gtd:20045134
Paper rst received 11th August 2004 and in nal revised form 13th May 2005
P.R.M. Brooking was with the School of Engineering, University of Durham,
South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK
M.A. Mueller is with the Institute for Energy Systems, School of Engineering &
Electronics, University of Edinburgh, The Kings Buildings, Mayeld Road,
Edinburgh EH9 3JL, UK
E-mail: markus.mueller@ed.ac.uk
IEE Proc.-Gener. Transm. Distrib., Vol. 152, No. 5, September 2005
Introduction
674
core back
slot region
translator
slot region
magnets
coils
flux path
Fig. 1
a Topology of one phase of linear VHM
b Three-phase prototype
100
50
induced EMF, V
50
100
6.0
Fig. 2
6.2
6.4
6.6
time, s
6.8
7.0
7.2
The instantaneous phase powers are then given by multiplying phase current and voltage:
2p
2
2 pd
^
^
sinot j
pj t Vp Ip cos ot cos
l
3
8
for j 1; 0; 1
The total instantaneous power extracted from the linear
generator and input into the DC-link is the sum of the
powers (assuming no losses) leading to
3
pi t p1 t p2 t p3 t V^p^Ip cos2 ot
9
2
Power ow is unidirectional from the linear generator into
the DC-link voltage. If it is assumed that the translator
travels an integer multiple of the magnetic wavelength, the
average power output from the linear generator into the
DC-link is simply obtained by integrating (9) over a
complete mechanical period:
3
10
Pi V^p^Ip
4
In (11) it is shown that the extracted power has a cyclical
uctuation at twice the frequency of mechanical oscillation,
from (9) and (10):
pi t Pi 1 cos2ot
11
^Ip
2
13
p
Note that the RMS phase voltage and current are 2
smaller than for a constant amplitude waveform, because of
the reciprocating movement of the translator.
The case may also arise where the translator moves
assymetrically, i.e faster in one direction than the other, as
occurred in a real experiment, shown in Fig. 3. The peak
current, voltage and half-cycle frequency in one direction
may be greater than the other. In this case the power
Vp
Ip
Tek Stop
Ch1
M 200ms A Ch1
5.00 V
Ch4
0.00 V
50.0 A
15
T1 T2
3
is scaled from the linear generator EMF and a potentiometer derived set point using an analogue multiplier. The
set point gives the constant of proportionality between the
EMF waveform and the reference current, enabling the
peak current to be set, and hence the power generated. This
signal is then compared to the actual current, the error
signal being used in a PWM modulator to generate the
correct PWM signals to drive the switches in the input
inverter.
The objective of the output inverter (Fig. 4, S712) is to
transfer the energy in the DC-link into the mains supply at
constant frequency and voltage. For maximum power
transfer the inverter is controlled so that the voltage and
current are in phase. In addition the output inverter is used
to regulate the DC-link capacitor voltage because the mains
voltage supply is permanent and predictable, unlike the
variable voltage output of the reciprocating generator.
The DC-link provides the interface between the input and
output inverters, and hence it inuences the operation of
both. For the particular case of a vernier hybrid machine in
which the inductance is high, the magnitude of the DC link
voltage will determine the slew rate of the active rectier
PWM current and hence the maximum output power of the
/3
2/3
permanent
magnets
a
Fig. 5
a Relative position of sense coil cores
b Photograph showing sense coils on test rig
Vdc
S1
S3
S5
S7
S9
S11
S8
S10
S12
S2
S4
S6
linear electrical
generator
Fig. 4
676
i ref (t )
+
generator
EMF
i0(t )
generator
output
current
PWM
modulator
K1
PWM1
PWM2
triangular
carrier
1/Ts
Fig. 6
ia(t)
Vdc (t )
Vdcref
Gv (s)
Va sin(t)
iaref
PWMa
ibref
Vb sin(t -120)
K1
+
ib(t)
K1
+
ic(t)
PWMb
ic ref
+
K1
PWMc
+
Vc sin(t -240)
triangular
carrier
1/Ts
Fig. 7
16
Po
p (t)
i
p (t)
c
Fig. 8
17
Po
sin2ot
oC
r
Po
2
sin2ot
vc t V c
oC
2
v2c t V c
18
Po
oCV c
21
23
P1
o1 CV c
DV2
P2
o2 CV c
Va
Fig. 9
31
32
25; 26
jLI
24
Vp
20
Ip
19
Experimental results
Tek Stop
Tek Stop
1
1
4
4
Ch1
M 200ms
5.00 V
Ch4
A Ch1
0.00 V
50.0 A
Ch1
M 200ms
2.00 V
Ch4
A Ch1
40.0mV
M 40.0ms A Ch1
40.0mV
50.0 A
a
Tek PreVu
Tek PreVu
Ch1
M 40.0ms A Ch1
5.00 V
Ch4
0.00 V
20.0 A
Ch1 1.00 V
Ch4
Fig. 10
20.0 A
b
Fig. 11
current
Tek PreVu
Tek Stop
Ch1 RMS
2.69 V
M
Ch1
M 200ms
200 mV
Ch4
Fig. 12
current
20.0 A
A Ch1
40.0mV
M 2.00 s A Ch1
Ch1 5.00 V
Ch4
100 W
Math
20.0 A
2.00 s
a
500mV
Tek PreVu
Ch1 RMS
2.69 V
M
M 400ms A Ch1
Ch1 5.00 V
Math
Ch4 20.0 A
100 W
400ms
500mV
Discussion
Conclusions
Acknowledgments
References
681