Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BINNET B SAM(143501)
Page 1
The above figure shows the microstructure of the depressed region caused by indentation of a
hardness-tested 2080: SiC:20p-T8 composite. Note that the indented region is large compared to
the size and spacing between the particles. Thus, the indentation measures the overall response of
the material and is relatively insensitive to localized effects. Very few cracked particles were
observed directly below or away from the indentation.
When the strength of the matrix is relatively low a wide range of hardness exists even when all
materials were heat-treated to the same tensile strength. This can be explained by the fact that as
the matrix strength decreases, load transfer to the high modulus particles is diminished. A lowerstrength matrix also renders a more prominent effect of reinforcement under indentation. If the
matrix strength is high, the effect is diminished.
Another explanation to rationalize the experimental findings (discrepancy between macro
hardness and tensile strength) is related to the localized nature of indentation loading.
BINNET B SAM(143501)
Page 2
During a tensile or compressive test, the material within the gauge section undergoes nominally
uniform deformation. In a hardness test, however, severe plastic flow is concentrated in the
localized region directly below the indentation, outside of which the material still behaves
elastically. Directly below the indentation the density of particles is forced to increase, compared
to regions away from the depression.
Following tests are generally used to determine the hardness values.
1) Vickers bulk hardness test
2) Brinell hardness test
3) Rockwell hardness test
BINNET B SAM(143501)
Page 3