Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Clothin (1)
100 Be -AD 2
Dedication
This book III dedlclIled to CtlrlI Hairles and all !he pMt and ~
mlln and 'NDfTWI aI the
StrMt Goard. in recognrtlon aI tta c ~ In Ronwl..-ch lind ~ Wooe the
fo..ndabOn a1me .cldely on 1912.
ermr.e
M .... --'.AQIrllrofoo..,_~
...... _ d ~ ~ .
...... ~ _ .. ~ ~ t n d
. ..
-"~01'
"-Act.l"'""lWId_~..,be~_
- - - . - - - . _ _ pl.
_"prIlIr
d"~_""""lI'ocIuIllbe
_1D"~
---
WI Qwwllw!;lugll 'MloIll
Ud.
lnl~oo
...k
."''''4 ...-.-..
_.oopuw
em..
c.a
o.gn,; AIIrl ~
....... b1H1fl~
~ bJ ....... ~ lbcIlridgoa. UK.
~
Acknowledgements
.~
o.o.c.. WI ~. USA
?, ., . . -
Artist'. Note
Re.dets m.y ~ to not, '"-' the cwlgInel ~ 110m whicto !he
colour plel-. In Ihs l:IOl;*. - . prepa'tld _ ......... tor priYate
sM.M~~~I$""'bylhe
~ M ~ IhouId be ldI
cd to:
upon_man.
__ into no ~
em
(,REAl DL\L 0
and equipm
basi
if he is clothed,
nL 1I
d b
TUNICS (TUNICA}
Ther i very liLtle evid ne
dLUing the R pu Ii , and
lit raJ ' and arti ti vid n
f Domitiu' Ah n arb I
Late Republican/early
Imperial tunics on
bronze statuettes
from Italy:
IA) Telamon,
IB) Villa Glulla, Rome.
Both wear short,
short-sle v d
tunics.
ur and
h R man
I~
1_ _
earli r peri d
Part of a rare glass vessel from
Vlndolanda, England, showing a
gladiatorial scene. The referee In
the centre wears a typical broad,
sleeveless Roman tunic In a buff
colour, with reddish-brown clavI,
the two vertical stripes from
shOUlder to lower edge; the te""
came from clavus, 'naif.
(Vlndolanda Museum)
a
till
l ,
to
to b 3Y1 ubits I ng
Ofl
luni
dging
Philadelphia
d d alt r-
11
ma, d
urn nts Uk
'miliLal
od supply of clothing
mad fr m wo I,
than on wi th at
an.
~Illralis - was worn to flatten the bunching around tlle waist, thus
concealing how the drapes had been produced. These i1ll.erpretations
are purely speculative, however, and any interpretations from sculptural
evidence alone are always fraught with difficulties. Unless further
e\~dcncc is forthcoming tlle deliberation over the correct design of these
tlillies may never be resolved.
It is not known LO what extent lhe Rhineland type of ulIlic was wom
elsewhere ,,,itllin tlle empire but, to judge from the available evidence,
this style \\IOIS only popular from around the beginning to tlle lauer half
of lhe lSI cemury, when il disappears entirely to be displaced by a
simpler, perh,lps more utilitarian version, This practical form of tunic
dearly e.XiSICd before tllC Rhineland examples, as it can be secn on
the Arch ofOl'ange (Augustus. 31 Be-AD 14), and on early Principalc
tombstones from Caesarca in Algelia. Il is also tlle tunic made familiar
by its depiction on Trnjan's Column (Trajan r.AD 98-117), and the
Chatswonll relief (Hadrian, r.AD 117-138), and is dearly tlle slyle wom
by the Camomile Streel soldic.' frolll London. The diffcrences between
this lllnic and lhose shown on lhe early Rhineland tombstones arc
readily appm'cnt: il has a su-aighllower hem and very few folds at all.
Decoration -
clavI
cenhJry, Rome.
\ r
,till
quipp d with
id arm,
n rail a
auxiliaries
f th
arl Prin ip
nd
m
MILITARY CLOAKS
from Imperial s ulptllre the common oldiers appear to hay
favour d twO distin t typ of cloaks - the paenula and th agum - whil
ffi r' f lh rank
c mun nand ab v had lh pLi n of waring a
mor formal
1 kn wn as a paludamenlUm. In R publican Lim
at rding
ivy ( I, 4.9), ther wa 1 arl a i ibl diEfi r n
etwe n th loa' w rn b om e and heir m n. H des ribe h w lh
Triblill Publiu D iu and' In f hi centurion wrapp d th m lye
in ommon oldi'r cloaks to di gui their rank when th w n OUlon
reconnaissance.
he prumula wa aIr ad e LabJ.i h
but i origin
may hay b en ev n arli r.
no unrlVlng xampl e. i from a
p iti 1 military nl xt il i nJ P ibl t r on LrU tide ign b
11 jud
Jibed as
, had
Camomile Street soldier had two different types of fastener on his cloak,
though the sculplOr certainly felt it was worthy of recording for posterity.
Both the sagum and its shorter derivative, the sagululII, I\lcrc simply
rectangular pieces of hea\')' woollen material. The papYnls document
BGU 1564 includes an order for fall I' cloaks cach 6 cubits (2.66111) long
and 4 cubits (1.17m) wide. These measuremcnts can be compared with
a surviving cloak from Nubia which ....'as 1.75rn long x 1.05m wide; one
from Nahal Ilcvcr (noo43) \\'hich '\~dS 2.iOm long x Io4Om wide; and
anOlher example from Thorsbcrg in Schleswig-Holstein, Germany,
which measured 250m long x 1.68m wide. The document records that
the cloaks ShOllld weigh 3Y. minae (1.6kg), and each cost 24 drachmae
(6 denarii).
The cloaks in BGU 1564 werc identical in size to a blankel recorded
in the S<lIne document that W'"<lS destined for t,he hospiull, although the
blankct was heavier and cost 28 drachmae (7 denarii). Cloaks of this si1_e
\\lere therefore quite broad and cOlild easily be wrapped around the
bod)' for extra warmth. A further suggestion of large size is provided by
the legend associated with 81 Martin (cAD 371-397) when he was
senring as a tribllne at Amiens. One bitterly cold day Martin saw a beg~rar
outside the city gates and. mo\'ed b}' his plight, cut his own cloak in tWO
and offered half lo the beggar.
In the lSI CClllury AD the pact r-,'!;:lr1ial (EIJig, VlII, 58) lampooncd it
man called Artemidonls, saying that as he wore thick cloaks he should
havc been named sagmis'. In contrasl there were also liglllcr versions
of the $llgllll/ which cQuld be worn in summer or indoors. TIle cloaks
seen on the Rhincland tombstones have almost as many folds as the
tunics, which might suggest thaI the}' were of a relatively light malerial.
Tht: sU1,.''1wt was fastened at the right shoulder by means of a brooch,
and this is one reason for the large numbers of brooches found on
military sites. The Roman hislOrian Varro (D.L.,
V, 167) claimed that the sagum was of Gallic
origin and had been adopted by the Romans
during the Celtic wars of the 4th celllury BC; but
il is also present in German and Spanish
contexts. The Sllgllll/ I\'as therefore another
example of the Romans borrowing what was
originall)' a barbarian form of dress and making
it their own,
It secms that the sagum was especially populal'
with the military and was worn by all l<lnk.~ from
COlTllllOn soldier to emperor. It is by far the most
common t}'pe of cloak represented on Trajan's
Column. In facl the sagulII became so associated
with the army that the phrase 'putting on the
miliuuy sagum' was analogous with 'going to war'.
It \II<IS because of Ihis militalistic associm,ion that
the pacific Emperor Marcus Aurelius lalcr tried
unsuccessfully to ban its use (SHA, Vl, 27). A
recently translated document discovered in
Carlisle refers lo tcn military cloaks, saga l1Iililan'a,
This is far from a unique reference, as 'militalJ'
cloaks' are also specifically mentioned by Appian
Eg~pt, of
uncerUlln d.ate. It Is tn a 1.2 twill
weave; a cUrYed hem hils been
tumed back and f1nlthtKl with
braid. (Unlvenlty of Penntylvanla
Museum, E1&8031
d in
nn
on tilll nt
c mm n r d d luff in Lh
madder,
unkn wn at that
<l
IIlg l eh-
an
v rLh 1
of a numb r
ver
bil,
g neral int r
incr ased
Agrippa. According to
Suelonius (AlIgtl.l"t1IJ". 25)
AgJippa was in fuCI honoured
by Octa"ian. who presented
him witll a blue nag.
The historian Appian
(V, 100) records that in
somewhat similar circumstances Sextus Pompey took
to wearing a blue cloak
because of his victories at
sea. What appears to be tlle
only other reference in
Roman litCf""dturc to blue
military tunics is when Lhe
historian Vegetius (Epi/., IV,
37), writing in the 4th
celllury AD, tells us thallhe
sailors in the British neet
dyed nOI only their tunics
but also the sails of their
in th
reen.
ir naJu "
01 ur n
ugg
Lh
R man oldi
, ore r d
olour r
. r Ii bl
or hi
appeared to have been a purple suipc. Thc red d)'c used was almoSl
certninly madder, rubia /hlct()l'U/lt, which in the case of Britain would have
had to be imponed. While a repon on the Vindolanda textiles concluded
thaI the picture of Roman soldiers in red tunics may well be correct, we
should remember thaI the textile fragmcnLS are extremely small and may
not be exclusively from tunics at all. A recently translated document from
Vindolanda actually refers to purple and red curtains...
(16) New Testament Gospels, Matthew, 28, 28; 1st century AD
It is perhaps of more than passing interest thaI the cloak the auxiliary
soldiers of theJerusalem ganison used to mock Christ, as documented by
Mauhew, was red. TIle reed stick and the crown of thoms immediately
recall the vine .stick that centurions carried, and the crowns orJeaves that
could be awarded to these officers. When the soldiers nagged Cluisl
could they have been \~cariously getting their own back on someone else?
The otller Gospels all refer to a purple doak. Under the circumstances a
red cloak is far more likely to have been readily available, but il is
ob\ious in what connotation the other Gospel writers regarded the
significance of a pUl'ple cloak.
(17) Martial, Epigrams, XIV, 129; 1st century AD
'When Manial described red canllsian cloaks he said that Rome wore
brown, the Gauls red, but that this was a colour which bo)'s and soldiers
also Iikcd, although it is not dear whether Martial meant all soldiers.
(18) Pliny the Elder (AD 23/4-79), Natllral History, XX, 3;
1st century AD
Pliny records that scarlet dye from the kennes was used for dyeing the
paludimleTllwn, the distinctive officer's cloak. He mentions thaI the most
commonly used red dye. madder, was grown near Rome; but that the
most prestigious red dye was obtained from the kermes (kmllococC1lS
venniliQ), a parasitic insect which infests the kennes oak throughout
southem Europe. He wrongly believed thaI the dre came from the berries
of the tree: it was in fact obtained from the female insects' egg sacks.
While red cloaks are ill\'aliably thought of as belonging to generals e.g. Caesar (Gallic War, VII, 5) - even here we must exercise caution.
When Sextus Pompeius (died c.36 Be) changed the colour of his cloak to
blue as mentioncd above, Appian (died cAD 165) sa}'S lhat he changed it
from the purple thal commandcrs usually wore
100). (h'e"tl!, howe\'cr.
there seems to be some confusion in texts both ancient and modem as to
the poi1ll. on the spectrum at which 'red' becomes purple.
ev,
amlmrwl on pngr JJ
""',.,
",,,'
.' "
_:..:.
. .....
_be..,
w.,..
from the same supply sources one could conclude that it was likely that
bOlh wore the same colour tunics.
On the other hand, Fucntes suggested thallocally recruited auxiliaries
could have \\'0111 lheil' own u-aditiomlily coloul'ed regional clothing. For
instance, in thc earl)' 1st cenlUI1' lhe Creek histOlian Su-abo (GfoIK., 3. 3.
7) described hO\\' the men in a number of Spanish lribeS dressed in black,
which may have been reneclcd in the colour of the tunics of lhe
tribesmen rccnliled illlO the A'Itlllian infanu1' and cavah1' units raised
from lhese regions. Almost cenainl)', before the reJorms of Augustus
which established the attxi!ill on a professional footing, new recruits
would have provided lheir own clolhing, a practice which mayor Ill:!}'
nO! have conlinucd for some Lime aflcrwards. If there was a
designatcd colour differcnce between dLil.cn and non-citizen soldiers it is
not known how this applied to those dlizens who are known LO havc
fonned some units of the auxllill. or if Lhe cohorts of citi7CIIS were
distingui~hed in an}' war
The best cvidence for the colour or auxiliary tunics are lhc rrescoes
from Dura Europos, Luxor and C,stcllum Dimidi (to be discussed in lhe
forthcoming second pan of !.his study). Frustratingl)'. lhese all dal,e from
after lhl: Constillltio AnLoniniana b)' which the Emperor Car::.calla (AD
211-217) granted Roman citizenship to all freeborn inhabitants of the
empire. wiping Oul at a sLroke the u'::'lditional differences between citil.en
legionaries and non-citizcn auxiliaries.
(22) Terlullian (born c.AD 160/AD 170). De CQrolla Militi.s, 1.3.
Tertullian describes a soldier being accused of being a Chrislian because
he rerl.l5eS lO wear a military crown. Before uial call commence the
accused is slripped of his milit;u1' insignia including his cloak, sword and
sandals, until he is lefl clad 'on1)' in rcd'. Of furthcr interest is
Termllian's descripliol1 of the milit<lry boots as mliga s!Jef'lIla/lJI'ia, which
suggests lhal lhis unfonunale soldier \\~dS a member of the emperor's
elite ca\'llry bodrgu;u'd, the SpeCUkltlJll!S Ill/gus/ii or 'Aubrllstan Scouts'.
(23) Encaustic (wax) portraits, Egypt; 2nd/3rd century AD
it is beSI LO inlroduce here the fUllcrdl1' portJ'rtits from
Ihe Fayum district of Eg)'pt. as lhe finest examples d,ue from lhe
1-ladrianic-SC\'el'rtn peliod. Apion. an Eg)'plian who cnlisled in !.he
Lmpcrial neet and ....'as u'rtnsferred to Misenml1 ill haly, wrOle to his falher
tdling him lhal he had sent by way ofa friclld a little picture of himself
- doubtless a portrait similar to those discovered in Eb'Jpt iLSClr. This
reminds us that cven II r.,irl)' humble soldier could anord lhese works of
art and th,11 lhey do not represent soleI)' the onicer class.
Hundred.. of llwse paintin&"S have no\\' been uncovered. They arc
painted in wa.'\: on either linen or wooden panels, a technique known as
cncaustic. DUling the person's liretime these portraits were probabl)'
displa)'ed around the house, but when !.hey died the)' were placed over
the race or the deceased and incorporated into the funernl bandages
wrapped around lhe bod),. In vicw or the al>o\'e letter it would not be
surprising if some or lhe slIl"viving ponrnil'i represented lllililary Illen; in
lact at lea.,>t six paintings ha\'c no\\' been identified as soldiers, and not as
members of .he PtOlemaic dynasty as previollsly believed. This identifi
calion resl'i chieny on the studded red leather s.....ord baldrics that lhese
Chronolo~,'ically
OTHER CLOTHING
fi
.it
again
e fr m
ci
0'
n,. sole
blIdl)' worn hobn.lIed mlllt.ry boot 'rom
Vlndol.nd England, pemaps
evidence of the .pparent
dlnleulty 01 .upj)l)'lng thl.
partleular fort .Ituated In u..
eefll,. of the northem frontier
zone. While providIng a firm grip
on grass the nail. on the IOle.
CO<.lld produc:e fatal reautt. on .n
eKe_lvel)' smooth .urtaee:
JOMphu. re<:onI. the death 01
c:enturlon during the .I_Ish
w..... who slipped and feU while
leading a eharge aero.. the
.tone-fl8!iJ'!iIed floor of the
Antonia fortress In Jerusalem
lBJ. e.1.8}. Modem I1Hlnacto...
....::ount.....Imllar problem. with
recan.trueted boola on many of
today" smooth road and
pedestrian .urf.ee
(Vlndoland. Mu.eum)
MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS
BIBLIOGRAPHY
monuc i,
rroutml/Pllt
alIi
RW Teil II,
..
A
,.
THE PATES
A: THE FALL OF THE REPUBLIC
A 1: Gaius Julius Caesar, c.57 BC
Almost everything Caesar did was calcuLated to get himself
noticed, and this naturally extended to his taste In dress.
Apart from his famous red cloak there is little mention of
distinctive military equipment; but Suetonius tells us that on
at least one occasion during the Gallic war, Caesar dressed
as a Gaul to pass through enemy territory (Suet.. LVIII). In the
battle against the Nervii (57 BC) Caesar grabbed a legionary
shield and fought in the front rank to encourage his men.
Here the shield is based on an example shown on stone
reliefs from Nart:Jonne. France, probably from a monument
commemorating the conquest of Gaul. It Is decorated with
gold- and silver-plated fittings as described by Suetonius
(Suet., LXVII). Caesar's muscle cuirass is also based on the
Narbonne reliefs. Although it is decorated with a lozenge or
rhomboid motif it is rather plain by comparison with other
statues showing armoured figures, and the reliefs may
therefore accurately record Caesar's battle armour.
A2: Marcus Llcinius Crass us, c.53 BC
Although Crassus earned a reputation for amassing a
vast fortune by highly unscrupulous methods, his career
was not without military success,
his most notable exploit being
the defeat of Spartacus in
71 BC. It was h s desire
to emulate the achievements of Caesar and
Pompey the Great that
led to his death at
Carrhae
dUring
a
disastrous campaign
against the Parthians.
Crassus Is depicted
here as described by
Plutarch, 'replacing
his black cloak with a
purple one' (Plu.,
XXIII). His portrait is
copied from a bust in
the Louvre, Paris, but
amended to match
Cicero's description
of Crassus as the
'bald heir of the
Nannei'.
A3: Sextus
Pompeius (died
c.36 BC)
Although represented by
Augustan propaganda
as little more than a
pirate, Pompeius was In
fact one of Rome's few
successful admirals. He
established an ndependent
power base in Sicily, and
remained a thom in the side of
the second Triumvirate until his
defeat in 36 BC. As a result of
c:
OUTPOSTS OF EMPIRE
C1: Auxiliary, Caesarea, Algeria, AD 40
Unlike the tombstones of similar date from the Rhineland,
on
A pollee official
..Iutn his commander In this detail
lrom relief fOllnd
near Ephesos in
TUr1<ey _ see Plate 03.
Note the fabric
wrapped around hi'
w,lst. 'these paramllltlry pollee were
known in the Oreek,peaking eastern part
of the emplra as
diogmitol.
H: SERVANTS OF ROME
H1: Legionary under punishment, 1st-2nd
century AD
A mil'lOf punIShment pmscribed by Augustus was IBCOI'ded
by SuetonIUS: 'He woolcl order men to stand all day In front 01
the general's headquarters. sometimes clad only in their
tunics and without sword belts, or sometimes holding
a len-fool pole or even a clod of
eanh' ~gustus, 24,2). The ten1001 pole would be a surveyor's
decempeda used for measuring,
and IUrfs were the basic material
for camp ramparts, which
might suggest that this
particular punishment was
lor sloppy work during
surveying or construction
duties. The humiliation
seems to have lain in the
removal 01 the weapon
belt - cingula militaris
- which was particularly associated with
military status.
This tombstone
from Athens showa e
me"ne weertng
$~lIm clo.k wtUI
sm.lI tls..1visible
on one edge - see
Plate 01,
Tombstone of T,CI.udllll
Halotl.ls from Cologne, Gennany.
This coml'l'llnder
of. Dalmatian luJtlIlary
cohort evfdentty chose to
be represented in civlllan glm
rather then mllltlry drelS lor his
funeral portrait _ se. Pllte H3.
OUTPOSTS OF EMPIRE
Causa,.a,
I: AllJdIlary,
Algeria, AD 4()
2: AUXiliary, JUdaea.
....0'"
3: AuJr11lary C&rlIUlio<J,
JUdaea, cAD 30
,
3
SERVANTS OF ROME
1: Legionary under punishment, 1st-2nd centuries AD
2: Senior tribune, 2nd century AD
3: Commander of au~lIiary cohort, 1st-2nd centuries AD