Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION
The populations of both developing
and developed countries are having an
increase in the number of elderly (WHO,
2010). It is predicted that by the year 2025,
Correspondence: Dr Tawatchai Apidechkul,
School of Health Science, Mae Fah Luang University, Chang Rai 57100, Thailand.
Tel: +66 053 916826
E-mail: tk2516ms@hotmail.com, tk2516ms@
gmail.com
1282
As life expectancy increases, the elderly will be subject to the same chronic,
often disabling diseases currently found
in the elderly, such as hypertension and
mental disorders. They may face environmental dangers and violence in their
societies. Advances in medical science and
social welfare can allow older people to
enjoy longer periods without disabilities.
Diseases may be avoided or their impact
lessened through better health care strategies. The resulting increase in the elderly
could be a boon for society, constituting
a great reservoir of experience and knowledge.
Seven point four percent of the population of Thailand was elderly in 1990; this
number increased to 10.7% in 2010 (Foundation of Thai Gerontology Research and
Development, 2009). The Thai Ministry of
Public Health estimated the proportion of
elderly people in Thailand will be 20% by
the year 2025, and 25% by the year 2030.
Most elderly are dependent. The main
cost for health care in the elderly is for the
treatment of chronic diseases. More than
150,000 elderly are dependent in Thailand
and this number is expected to increase
to 240,000 by the year 2019; according to
the Thai Ministry of Public Health, more
than 70% of current dependents receive
inadequate support form their family or
communities (Leelapan, 2002).
The Thai Ministry of Social Development and Human Security reported in
2007 there were 7 million elderly people
in Thailand, but only 43.0% of those had
good health, but those aged 80 years
Vol 42 No. 5 September 2011
of life. The scores of the mental health assessment were divided into 3 levels: 6-14
points, low level; 15-22 points, middle
level; and 23-30 points, high level mental
quality of life. The scores for the social
relationship assessment were divided into
3 levels: 3-7 points, low level; 8-11 points,
middle level; and 12-15 points, high
level of quality of social relationships.
The scores of the environmental factors
were divided into 3 levels: 8-18 points,
low level; 19-29 points, middle level; and
30-40 points, high level environmental
factors. The overall interpretation of the
quality of life was divided into 3 levels:
26-60 points, low level; 61-95 points,
middle level; and 96-130 points, high level
quality of life.
The GHQ-28 had 28 questions. The
questions 1-7 measured somatic symptoms, questions 8-14 measured anxiety
and insomnia, questions 15-21 measured
social dysfunction, and questions 22-28
measured depression.
Data collection procedures
Data were double-entered and validated using Microsoft Excel. Data analysis
was carried out using SPSS version 11.5,
2006 (SPSS, Chicago, IL), STATA (version
8.2 (Stata Corp, College Station, TX), and
Epi-Info version 6.04d (US Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta,
GA).
Descriptive statistics. Frequencies, percent-
Table 1
Univariate analysis of quality of life in rural area by age categories.
Quality of life levels
Factor
Age (years)
c2
Low (%) Middle (%) High (%)
Physical health
Mental health
Social relationships
Environment
Overall
a
60-69
70-79
80+
60-69
70-79
80+
60-69
70-79
80+
60-69
70-79
80+
60-69
70-79
80+
0 (0.0)
2 (4.4)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
2 (4.5)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
2 (4.4)
0 (0.0)
43 (72.9)
36 (80.0)
4 (80.0)
36 (61.0)
23 (51.1)
2 (40.0)
7 (11.9)
7 (13.5)
0 (0.0)
31 (52.5)
19 (43.2)
3 (60.0)
42 (71.2)
34 (75.6)
4 (80.0)
16 (27.1)
4.59
7 (15.6)
7 (15.6)
23 (39.0)
1.60a
22 (48.9)
3 (60.0)
52 (88.1)
2.14a
37 (84.1)
5 (100.0)
28 (47.6)
5.55
23 (52.3)
2 (40.0)
17 (22.8)
3.79
9 (20.0)
1 (20.0)
p-value
0.597
0.658
0.544
0.475
0.705
Table 2
Univariate analysis of quality of life in suburban areas by age categories.
Quality of life levels
Factor
Age (years)
c2
Low (%) Middle (%) High (%)
Physical health
Mental health
Social relationships
Environment
Overall
1286
60-69
70-79
80+
60-69
70-79
80+
60-69
70-79
80+
60-69
70-79
80+
60-69
70-79
80+
1 (2.0)
1 (2.0)
0 (0.0)
1 (2.0)
1 (2.0)
0 (0.0)
1 (1.9)
1 (1.7)
0 (0.0)
1 (2.0)
2 (4.0)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
1 (2.0)
0 (0.0)
27 (55.1)
28 (56.0)
12 (70.6)
18 (36.7)
21 (42.0)
7 (41.2)
14 (26.4)
16 (26.7)
5 (27.8)
20 (40.8)
17 (34.0)
6 (35.3)
16 (32.7)
9 (18.0)
4 (23.5)
21 (42.9)
1.53
21 (42.0)
5 (29.4)
30 (61.2)
0.64
28 (56.0)
10 (58.8)
38 (71.7)
0.34
43 (71.7)
13 (72.2)
28 (57.1)
1.37
31 (62.0)
11 (64.7)
33 (67.3)
4.01
40 (80.0)
13 (76.5)
p-value
0.822
0.958
0.987
0.850
0.404
Table 3
Univariate analysis of quality of life by area and sex.
Quality of life levels
Area
Factor
Sex
c2
Low (%) Middle (%) High (%)
Rural
Physical health
Mental health
Social relationships
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
Environment
Male
Female
Overall
Male
Female
Suburban Physical health
Male
Female
Mental health
Male
Female
Social relationships Male
Female
Environment
Male
Female
Overall
Male
Female
0 (0.0)
2 (2.9)
1 (2.1)
1 (1.5)
0 (0.0)
2 (2.9)
1 (2.1)
2 (2.9)
0 (0.0)
1 (1.5)
1 (1.9)
1 (1.8)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
1 (1.9)
2 (1.8)
2 (3.7)
0 (0.0)
24 (50.0)
43 (63.2)
17 (35.4)
29 (42.6)
7 (14.58)
21 (39.88)
16 (33.3)
27 (39.7)
11 (22.9)
18 (26.5)
37 (68.5)
46 (83.6)
27 (50.0)
34 (61.8)
8 (15.1)
7 (12.7)
23 (42.6)
30 (54.5)
35 (64.8)
45 (81.8)
24 (50.0)
4.08
23 (33.8)
30 (62.5)
0.62
38 (55.9)
41 (55.42) 5.61
45 (66.18)
31 (64.6)
0.63
39 (57.4)
37 (77.1)
0.94
49 (72.1)
16 (29.6)
3.64
8 (14.5)
27 (50.0)
1.54a
21 (38.2)
46 (84.9)
0.01a
48 (87.3)
30 (55.6)
1.36
24 (43.6)
17 (31.5)
5.06
10 (18.2)
p-value
0.130
0.725
0.060 b
0.729
0.624
0.163
0.214
0.941
0.507
0.080 b
Table 4
Univariate analysis of quality of life by area.
Quality of life
Factor
Area
c2
Low (%) Middle (%) High (%)
Physical health
Mental health
Social relationships
Environment
Rural
Suburban
Rural
Suburban
Rural
Suburban
Rural
Suburban
2 (1.8)
2 (1.7)
0 (0.0)
2 (1.7)
0 (0.0)
2 (1.5)
2 (1.9)
3 (2.6)
83 (76.1)
67 (57.8)
61 (56.0)
46 (39.7)
14 (13.0)
35 (26.7)
53 (49.1)
43 (37.1)
24 (22.0)
8.95
47 (40.5)
48 (44.0)
7.34
68 (58.6)
94 (87.0)
8.87
94 (71.8)
53 (49.1)
3.31
70 (60.3)
p-value
0.011a
0.025a
0.012a
0.191
Significant at a=0.05
1287
Table 5
Univariate analysis of quality of life by sex and area.
Quality of life
Sex
Factor
Area
c2
Low (%) Middle (%) High (%)
Male
Physical health
Mental health
Social relationships
Environment
Female Physical health
Mental health
Social relationships
Environment
Rural
Suburban
Rural
Suburban
Rural
Suburban
Rural
Suburban
Rural
Suburban
Rural
Suburban
Rural
Suburban
Rural
Suburban
1 (1.9)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
1 (2.1)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
1 (1.85)
1 (2.1)
1 (1.8)
2 (2.9)
0 (0.0)
1 (1.5)
0 (0.0)
2 (2.9)
1 (1.8)
2 (2.9)
37 (68.5)
24 (50.0)
27 (50.0)
17 (35.4)
7 (13.0)
8 (16.7)
23 (42.6)
16 (33.3)
46 (83.6)
43 (63.2)
34 (61.8)
29 (42.6)
7 (12.7)
21 (30.9)
30 (54.5)
27 (39.7)
16 (29.6) 5.04
24 (50.0)
27 (50.0) 3.09
30 (62.5)
47 (87.0) 0.34a
40 (83.3)
30 (55.6) 1.08
31 (64.4)
8 (14.5) 6.39
23 (33.8)
21 (38.2) 4.98
38 (55.9)
48 (87.3) 9.02
45 (66.2)
24 (43.6) 2.72
39 (57.4)
p-value
0.081
0.213
0.561
0.583
0.041
0.083
0.011b
0.257
Table 6
Univariate analysis of mental health status in suburban areas by age.
Mental health status
Factor
Age (years)
c2
p-value
Normal (%)
Abnormal (%)
Somatic symptoms
Anxiety and insomnia
Severe depression
60-69
70-79
80+
60-69
70-79
80+
60-69
70-79
80+
58 (96.7)
42 (93.3)
5 (100.0)
60 (0.0)
44 (97.8)
5 (100.0)
60 (0.0)
43 (95.6)
5 (100.0)
2 (3.3)
0.91
3 (6.7)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
1.46
1 (2.2)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
2.94
2 (4.4)
0 (0.0)
0.635
0.482
0.230
Table 7
Univariate analysis of mental health status in rural areas by age.
Mental health status
Factor
Age (years)
c2
p-value
Normal (%)
Abnormal (%)
Somatic symptoms
Anxiety and insomnia
Social dysfunction
60-69
70-79
80+
60-69
70-79
80+
60-69
70-79
80+
46 (95.8)
46 (92.0)
16 (94.1)
47 (97.9)
49 (98.0)
15 (88.2)
30 (62.5)
33 (66.0)
10 (58.8)
2 (4.2)
0.63
4 (8.0)
1 (5.9)
1 (2.1)
4.08
1 (2.0)
2 (11.8)
18 (37.5)
0.32
17 (34.0)
7 (41.2)
0.729
0.130
0.854
Table 8
Univariate analysis of mental health status by area and sex.
Mental health status
Area
Factor
Sex
c2
p-value
Normal (%) Abnormal (%)
Rural
Somatic symptoms
Male
55 (98.2)
1 (1.8)
2.01a
0.364
Female
52 (92.9)
4 (7.1)
Anxiety and insomnia Male
55 (98.2)
1 (1.8)
1.39 a
0.238
Female
56 (100.0)
0 (0.0)
Severe depression
Male
54 (96.4)
2 (3.6)
2.81a
0.094
Female
56 (100.0)
0 (0.0)
Suburban Somatic symptoms
Male
45 (95.7)
2 (4.3)
0.49a
0.699
Female
63 (92.6)
5 (7.4)
Anxiety and insomnia Male
46 (97.9)
1 (2.1)
0.46a
0.498
Female
65 (95.6)
3 (4.4)
Social dysfunction
Male
32 (68.1)
15 (31.9)
0.73a
0.392
Female
41 (60.3)
27 (39.7)
Fishers exact test
Table 9
Univariate analysis of mental health by area.
Mental health status
Factor
Area
c2
p-value
Normal (%) Abnormal (%)
Somatic symptoms
Anxiety and insomnia
Social dysfunction
Severe depression
Rural
Suburban
Rural
Suburban
Rural
Suburban
Rural
Suburban
107 (95.5)
108 (93.9)
111 (99.1)
111 (96.5)
112 (100.0)
73 (63.5)
110 (98.2)
115 (100.0)
5 (4.5)
0.30a
7 (6.1)
1 (0.9)
1.89a
4 (3.5)
0 (0.0)
66.47a
42 (36.5)
2 (1.8)
2.84a
0 (0.0)
0.584
0.169
<0.001b
0.092
Table 10
Univariate analysis of mental health by sex and areas.
Mental health status
Sex
Factors
Area
c2
p-value
Normal (%) Abnormal (%)
Male
Somatic symptoms
Rural
55 (98.2)
1 (1.8)
0.56a
0.457
Suburban
45 (95.7)
2 (4.3)
Anxiety and insomnia
Rural
55 (98.2)
1 (1.8)
0.16a
1.000
Suburban
46 (97.9)
1 (2.1)
Social dysfunction
Rural
56 (100.0)
0 (0.0)
26.7a
<0.001b
Suburban
32 (68.1)
15 (31.9)
Severe depression
Rural
54 (96.4)
2 (3.6)
2.47a
0.499
Suburban
47 (100.0)
0 (0.0)
Femalec
Somatic symptoms
Rural
52 (92.9)
4 (7.1)
0.00a
0.964
Suburban
63 (92.6)
5 (7.4)
Anxiety and insomnia
Rural
56 (100.0)
0 (0.0)
3.67a
0.056b
Suburban
65 (95.6)
3 (4.4)
Social dysfunction
Rural
56 (100.0)
0 (0.0)
38.59
0.008b
Suburban
41 (60.3)
27 (39.7)
Fishers exact test; bSignificant at a=0.05; c Severe depression was not found among females from
rural and suburban areas.
a
1292