Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Pathophysiology of arrhythmogenic
cardiomyopathy
Cristina Basso, Barbara Bauce, Domenico Corrado and Gaetano Thiene
Abstract | Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (AC) is a clinically and genetically heterogeneous disorder of heart
muscle that is associated with ventricular arrhythmias and risk of sudden cardiac death, particularly in the
young and athletes. Mutations in five genes that encode major components of the desmosomes, namely
junction plakoglobin, desmoplakin, plakophilin2, desmoglein2, and desmocollin2, have been identified in
approximately half of affected probands. AC is, therefore, commonly considered a desmosomal disease.
No single test is sufficiently specific to establish a diagnosis of AC. The diagnostic criteria for AC were
revised in 2010 to improve sensitivity, but maintain specificity. Quantitative parameters were introduced and
identification of a pathogenic mutation in a first-degree relative has become a major diagnostic criterion.
Caution in the interpretation of screening results is highly recommended because a pathogenic mutation
is difficult to define. Experimental data confirm that this genetically determined cardiomyopathy develops
after birth because of progressive myocardial dystrophy, and is initiated by cardiomyocyte necrosis; cellular
and animal models are necessary to gain insight into the cascade of underlying molecular events. Crosstalk
from the desmosome to the nucleus, gap junctions, and ion channels is under investigation, to move from
symptomatic to targeted therapy, with the ultimate aim to stop disease onset and progression.
Basso, C. etal. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 9, 223233 (2012); published online 29 November 2011; doi:10.1038/nrcardio.2011.173
Introduction
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Department of Medical
Diagnostic Sciences
and Special Therapies
(C. Basso, G. Thiene)
and Department of
Cardiac, Thoracic and
Vascular Sciences
(B.Bauce, D. Corrado),
University of Padua
Medical School,
Via A.Gabelli,
6135121Padova,
Italy.
Correspondence to:
C. Basso
cristina.basso@unipd.it
REVIEWS
Key points
Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (AC) is a familial heart-muscle disease
that is usually inherited with an autosomal-dominant pattern; mutations
in desmosomal-protein genes are found in approximately 50% of probands
The 1994 diagnostic criteria were updated in 2010 to increase their sensitivity,
but maintain their specificity; differential diagnosis with AC phenocopies is
mandatory when dealing with sporadic forms of AC
Emerging tools offer the possibility to visualize the fibrofatty scar, as either
low-voltage myocardial areas using electroanatomical mapping, or areas
of delayed contrast-enhancement with cardiac MRI
Genotypephenotype studies show that the clinicomorphological spectrum
of AC is wider than originally thought, and includes variants with predominant
or even isolated left ventricular involvement within a single family
Animal and cellular models indicate that both abnormal biomechanical
properties and crosstalk from the desmosome to the nucleus, gap junctions,
and ion channels are implicated in the pathobiology of AC
Electrical instability is the main clinical manifestation of AC; in addition
to re-entry arrhythmias caused by fibrofatty replacement, current hypotheses
implicate acute cell death, gap-junction remodeling, and ion-channel crosstalk
Clinical diagnosis of AC
Suspicion of classical AC usually arises when adolescents
or young adults present with heart palpitations, syncope,
or cardiac arrest. Ventricular tachycardia or premature
ventricular beats with left bundle branch morphology and
Twave inversion in the V1 to V3 leads on a 12lead electro
cardiogram (ECG) are common reasons to suspect AC.
Less-common presentations are RV or biventricular heart
failure, which can mimic dilated cardiomyopathy.2,18 The
major challenge is to distinguish AC from a normal heart
with physiological adaptation to hemodynamic overload,
such as occurs in athletes, and from so-called disease
phenocopies, which include myocarditis, sarcoidosis,
idiopathic RV outflow tract tachycardia, and congenital
heart disease with RV overload.
No single, gold-standard criterion is sufficiently speci
fic to establish reliably a diagnosis of AC. Multiple para
meters are needed, therefore, as included in the original
1994 Task Force diagnostic criteria,11 which combined
multiple sources of diagnostic information, such as
familial, electrocardiographic, arrhythmic, morpho
functional, and histopathological findings. Although they
provide an extremely useful common approach to clinical
diagnosis in index patients, the 1994 criteria have been
shown to lack sensitivity for the identification of early or
minor phenotypes, particularly in the setting of familial
disease.19 A limitation of the original Task Force criteria
was the lack of quantitative cut-off values for accurate
grading of RV dilatation and dysfunction, and fibrofatty
myocardial replacement.
REVIEWS
patients with AC in whom endocardial ablation failed con
firmed an observation made by pathologiststhat fibro
fatty replacement (electroanatomical scarring) is more
extensive on the epicardial than the endocardial side.28
However, electroanatomical mapping is invasive and per
formed only in selected patients with suspected AC and
ventricular arrhythmias of RV origin for differential diag
nosis with idiopathic RV outflow tract tachycardia, and to
guide catheter ablation of the arrhythmogenic substrate.
Left-dominant AC
Most of the information on AC comes from studies
of the usual form of the disease with predominant RV
involvement. However, recognition of a disease pattern
characterized by early and predominant LV involvement
has increased. The left-dominant AC (LDAC) pattern
should not be confused with the well-known LV involve
ment observed in the advanced stages of AC, as a result
of disease progression. Clinical markers of LDAC include
ECG abnormalities that suggest left-side involvement,
such as lateral or inferolateral Twave inversion (leads V5,
V6, LI, and aVL),24,29 and ventricular arrhythmias of right
bundle branch block morphology that suggests an LV
origin. True LDAC mirrors classic right-dominant AC,
with the left ventricle more-severely affected than the right
ventricle (an RV/LV volume ratio <1).
A far more-sensitive indicator of left-sided disease
is late gadolinium enhancement, which is frequently
detected in a segment without a concomitant wall-motion
abnormality, and thus precedes the onset of LV dysfunc
tion or dilatation. Typically, LV late gadolinium enhance
ment involves the inferolateral and inferoseptal regions,
and affects the subepicardial or midwall layers, similar to
the histological pattern of fibrofatty myocardial replace
ment observed at post-mortem examination.6,13,14,30 Septal
late gadolinium enhancement is present in >50% of cases
of LDAC,24 unlike the right-dominant classical pattern in
which septal involvement is unusual.
Differential diagnosis of dilated cardiomyopathy
in patients with suspected AC is mandatory for risk-
stratification and familial-evaluation purposes. The main
distinction in LDAC is a propensity to electrical instabil
ity that exceeds the degree of ventricular dysfunction,
compared with dilated cardiomyopathy, where ventricu
lar arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death occur in the
context of overt systolic dysfunction with symptoms of
heart failure. Moreover, regional involvement (by contrast
with the global involvement in dilated cardiomyopathy)
is suggestive of AC, particularly when RV abnormalities
are prominent.24
Importantly, patients with a moderate-to-severe
decrease in LV function were excluded from a diagnosis
of AC by the 1994 Task Force criteria,11 but this restriction
has been eliminated in the 2010 criteria.19 As recognized
by the Task Force, awareness is growing that classic AC
with RV involvement is the most well-recognized variant
of a broad spectrum of disease that includes LDAC and
biventricular subtypes. The lack of specific diagnos
tic guidelines contributes to the under-recognition of
these nonclassical variants of AC. Future revisions of the
REVIEWS
Table 1 | Genes associated with AC
Reference
Gene
Chromosome
locus
Protein
Mode of
inheritance
Comment
McKoy etal.31
JUP
17q21
Junction plakoglobin
AR*
Cardiocutaneous syndrome
Asimaki etal.
JUP
17q21
Junction plakoglobin
AD
None
Norgett etal.33
DSP
6p24
Desmoplakin
AR
Cardiocutaneous syndrome
Rampazzo etal.
DSP
6p24
Desmoplakin
AD
None
Gerull etal.38
PKP2
12p11
Plakophilin2
AD, AR
None
Pilichou etal.39
DSG2
18q12
Desmoglein2
AD
None
Syrris etal.
DSC2
18q12
Desmocollin2
AD, AR
None
Desmosomal genes
41
36
40
Extradesmosomal genes
Tiso etal.44
RYR2
1q42q43
Ryanodine receptor2
AD
Beffagna etal.45
TGFB3
14q23q24
Transforming growth
factor3
AD
Pathogenic or modifier?
Merner etal.46
TMEM43
3p25
Transmembrane
protein43 (protein LUMA)
AD
None
DES
2q35
Desmin
AD
Taylor etal.48
TTN
2q31
Titin
AD
*Naxos disease. Carvajal disease. Abbreviations: AC, arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy; AD, autosomal dominant; AF, atrial fibrillation; AR, autosomal recessive;
CPVT, catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia; DC, dilated cardiomyopathy; HC, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
REVIEWS
involve residues that are highly conserved across species.
Notably, mutations in nonwhite controls occurred at a
significantly higher frequency than in white controls,
suggesting an influence of ethnicity on the probability of
missense mutations truly being pathogenic.56
All these considerations explain why, despite increasing
accessibility to genetic-screening facilities for patients and
cardiologists, caution is needed before genetic testing can
be considered for routine clinical use. Although cascade
genetic screening of family members of gene-positive pro
bands remains a major indication, the clinical application
should be performed at referral centers with expertise in
inherited cardiovascular disorders, where the test can be
interpreted by qualified genetic counselors and discussed
with the patient.57 Genetic testing for AC is not a per
fectly binary test that yields a positive or negative result,
and should not override clinical judgment. An identified
genetic variant cannot be considered the Holy Grail of
diagnosis and, equally, relatives with border-line find
ings should not be discharged just because of a negative
screening for a mutation identified in the index patient
with AC. More importantly, a careful clinical and genetic
evaluation of the family members remains essential
because analysis of co-segregation is often crucial to help
assess the pathogenic relevance of a mutation.
Myocardial dystrophy
The degenerative theory (myocardial dystrophy), 6
which was postulated in 1996, long before the discovery
of disease-causing gene mutations, remains the most-
comprehensive pathogenic theory of AC. The observa
tion of similar histopathological features in AC and
skeletal-muscle dystrophies, consisting of acquired and
progressive muscular atrophy with fatty and fibrous tissue
REVIEWS
Desmosome crosstalk
Ion channels
Gap junctions
Nucleus
Electrical heterogeneity
Conduction slowing
Loss of cardiomyocytes,
fibrogenesis, adipogenesis
Arrhythmogenic
cardiomyopathy
Ventricular arrhythmias
Desmosomal interactions
Mutations in desmosomal genes can interfere with signal
ing pathways to the nucleus, gap-junctional proteins, and
ion channels. Interruption of these crosstalk pathways can
result in the phenotype of AC (Figure2).
Desmosomal crosstalk with the nucleus
In addition to mechanical factors, possible intracellular
signaling pathways that mediate desmosome-to-nucleus
crosstalk and regulation of gene expression have been
investigated in mouse models that recapitulate the pheno
type of AC. Data from cardiac-restricted Dsp+/ mice indi
cate that suppression of Dsp causes nuclear translocation
of junction plakoglobin, where it competes with catenin1
for transcription factor7-like2 (formerly known as Tcellspecific transcription factor4), which leads to inhibition
of the canonical Wntcatenin 1 signaling pathway.66
Activation of Wntcatenin1 signaling enhances myo
genesis, inhibits adipogenic transcription factors (such
as CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein, adiponectin,
and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor), and
maintains preadipocytes in an undifferentiated state. By
contrast, suppression of Wntcatenin1 signaling initiates
adipogenesis and proliferation of adipocytes, and reduces
the expression levels of target genes (MYC, CCND1).66
In an inducible, cardiac-restricted Jup/ mouse with
altered desmosomal ultrastructure and diminished pres
ence of desmosomal proteins at the intercalated discs,
loss of junction plakoglobin caused increased stabiliza
tion of catenin 1, associated with activated RAC
serine/threonine-protein kinase (also known as AKT1
kinase) and inhibition of glycogen synthase kinase3.63
According to these data, catenin1transcription-factor
activity (transcription factor7, lymphoid enhanced-
binding factor1) might contribute to the hypertrophic
response in cardiac-restricted Jup/ mice.
A mouse model of cardiomyocyte-restricted loss of
junction plakoglobin was developed and recapitulated the
phenotype of AC with ultrastructural evidence of absent
desmosomes.67 Despite the increase in catenin1 at adhe
rens junctions in cardiomyocytes from Jup-mutant mice,
Wntcatenin1 signaling was not altered. By contrast,
228 | APRIL 2012 | VOLUME 9
REVIEWS
Myocarditis
In addition to the inherited metabolic or ultrastructuraldefect (dystrophic) theory, cardiomyocyte necrosis could
be ascribed to myocarditis (the inflammatory theory).
This pathogenic theory remains under consideration
because inflammatory cells are a common observation
in pathology studies of hearts with AC, with a reported
prevalence of up to 75%.6,72 The inflammation might be
a reaction to proinflammatory cytokines induced by cell
death or apoptosis, or caused by a viral infection. The
well-known heredofamilial background of the disease
is not inconsistent with the viral-infection hypothesis,
because disease genes can influence both anti-infective
and autoimmune responses, as observed in dilated
cardiomyopathy.73 Cardiotropic viruses, such as entero
virus, adenovirus, hepatitisC virus, and parvovirusB19,
have been reported in the myocardium of some patients
with AC, and proposed as possible etiological agents in
support of an infective pathogenesis.74 Alternative expla
nations could be that the viral agent acts as a bystander
or, more likely, that the dystrophic myocardium favors
viral settlement (superimposed myocarditis), which
leads to progression of the disease phenotype. However,
the observation of extensive inflammation in the early
stages of disease onset in transgenic mouse models of
AC,62,63 and the frequent detection of myocarditis in the
absence of viral genome in both familial dilated cardio
myopathy and AC, are consistent with the hypothesis of
noninfective myocarditis.
A process of active necrosis with an accompanying
inflammatory response might underlie the clinical onset
or the periodical exacerbations of an otherwise chronic
disease, as demonstrated in both transgenic mice and
human samples.6,62,72 Accordingly, chest pain, ECG abnor
malities, and release of myocardial enzymes (mimicking
an acute myocardial infarction) are sometimes reported
in patients with AC, particularly during adolescence
(probably because of increased mechanical wall stress).29
Moreover, a higher level of Creactive protein has been
demonstrated in patients with AC soon after ventricular
tachycardia compared with idiopathic RV outflow tract
tachycardia.75 Consistent with the hypothesis that pro
inflammatory cytokines might be induced by cell death
or apoptosis, high plasma levels of IL1, IL6, and
tumor necrosis factor were found in a small series of
patients with AC.76 An altered distribution of junction
plakoglobin at the intercalated disc in cardiac sarcoidosis,
giant-cell myocarditis, and AC is consistent with a role
of cytokines in disruption of desmosomal proteins, and
arrhythmogenesis in patients with AC.21
The source of fibrofatty tissue
In both the dystrophic and inflammatory theories, the
fibrofatty replacement of ventricular myocardium has
been considered for many years to be a nonspecific, repar
ative response to myocardial injury, similar to the process
that occurs after ischemic death in an acute myocardial
infarction. A transdifferentiation theory has been pro
posed as an alternative explanation for progressive myo
cardial atrophy and fatty replacement, which suggests that
REVIEWS
by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor, whose
dysregulation might explain the fibrofatty replacement of
the myocardium in patients with AC. The gene product
of TMEM43 has been demonstrated to be the protein
previously known as protein LUMA, which is a binding
partner of emerin and the lamins, and has been associated
with EmeryDreifuss muscular dystrophy.80
REVIEWS
AC, the high rate of inappropriate interventions and
complications, and the psychological effects in young
patients, argue strongly against indiscriminate device
implantation.96,97 Cardiac transplantation is unusual in
patients with AC, but has been performed for both inces
sant ventricular tachycardia and end-stage heart failure
that is refractory to conventional treatment.
Risk stratification remains the major challenge for
clinicians treating patients with AC. The available data,
which are still derived from retrospective clinical studies,
suggest that young age, previous cardiac arrest, fast and
poorly tolerated ventricular tachycardia with various
morphologies, syncope, severe RV dysfunction, and LV
involvement are potential predictors of poor prognosis
and sudden cardiac death. A malignant family history
alone is not considered a predictor of increased risk of
AC and does not justify an ICD.97 Data are too limited
to allow speculation on the potential role of genotyping
for risk stratification and therapy in patients with AC.
However, the available evidence suggests that, although
asymptomatic patients with AC and healthy gene-carriers
do not require prophylactic treatment, these individuals
should have a regular cardiac follow-up.
Conclusions
Much progress has been made at both the bench and
the bedside since the discovery of the first AC-causing
gene mutations.32 The 1994 diagnostic criteria11 were
updated in 201019 to increase their sensitivity in famil
ial cases of AC, and differential diagnosis with so-called
phenocopies is always pursued in sporadic cases. Novel
diagnostic tools for tissue characterization are increas
ingly used and include electroanatomical mapping 26 and
contrast-enhanced cardiac MRI.22,23 The latter is a unique
tool to detect early LV involvement, even in the setting
of preserved LV morphology and function.23 Genotype
phenotype correlative studies have shown that LV involve
ment is part of the disease phenotype,25 which justifies the
more-inclusive name arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy.
Risk stratification remains the main clinical challenge
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
REVIEWS
17. Corrado, D., Basso, C., Thiene, G.
Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy, An Issue
of Cardiac Electrophysiology Clinics (Elsevier,
New York, 2011).
18. Corrado, D., Basso, C., Pilichou, K. & Thiene, G.
Molecular biology and clinical management of
arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/
dysplasia. Heart 97, 530539 (2011).
19. Marcus, F.I. etal. Diagnosis of arrhythmogenic
right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia:
proposed modification of the Task Force Criteria.
Eur. Heart J. 31, 806814 (2010).
20. Asimaki, A. etal. A new diagnostic test for
arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy.
N. Engl. J. Med. 360, 10751084 (2009).
21. Asimaki, A. etal. Altered desmosomal proteins
in granulomatous myocarditis and potential
pathogenic links to arrhythmogenic right
ventricular cardiomyopathy. Circ. Arrhythm.
Electrophysiol. 4, 743752 (2011).
22. Tandri, H. etal. Noninvasive detection of
myocardial fibrosis in arrhythmogenic right
ventricular cardiomyopathy using delayedenhancement magnetic resonance imaging.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 45, 98103 (2005).
23. SenChowdhry, S. etal. Cardiovascular magnetic
resonance in arrhythmogenic right ventricular
cardiomyopathy revisited: comparison with task
force criteria and genotype. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.
48, 21322140 (2006).
24. SenChowdhry, S. etal. Left-dominant
arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy: an underrecognized clinical entity. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.
52, 21752187 (2008).
25. SenChowdhry, S. etal. Clinical and genetic
characterization of families with arrhythmogenic
right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy
provides novel insights into patterns of disease
expression. Circulation 115, 17101720
(2007).
26. Corrado, D. etal. Three-dimensional
electroanatomic voltage mapping increases
accuracy of diagnosing arrhythmogenic right
ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia.
Circulation 111, 30423050 (2005).
27. Corrado, D. etal. Three-dimensional
electroanatomical voltage mapping and
histologic evaluation of myocardial substrate
in right ventricular outflow tract tachycardia.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 51, 731739 (2008).
28. Garcia, F.C., Bazan, V., Zado, E.S., Ren, J.F.
& Marchlinski, F.E. Epicardial substrate and
outcome with epicardial ablation of ventricular
tachycardia in arrhythmogenic right ventricular
cardiomyopathy/dysplasia. Circulation 120,
366375 (2009).
29. Bauce, B. etal. Clinical profile of four families with
arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy
caused by dominant desmoplakin mutations.
Eur. Heart J. 26, 16661675 (2005).
30. Corrado, D. etal. Spectrum of clinicopathologic
manifestations of arrhythmogenic right
ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia: a
multicenter study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 30,
15121520 (1997).
31. Nava, A. etal. Familial occurrence of right
ventricular dysplasia: a study involving nine
families. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 12, 12221228
(1988).
32. McKoy, G. etal. Identification of a deletion in
plakoglobin in arrhythmogenic right ventricular
cardiomyopathy with palmoplantar keratoderma
and woolly hair (Naxos disease). Lancet 355,
21192124 (2000).
33. Rampazzo, A. etal. The gene for arrhythmogenic
right ventricular cardiomyopathy maps to
chromosome 14q23q24. Hum. Mol. Genet.
3, 959962 (1994).
www.nature.com/nrcardio
2012 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
REVIEWS
68. Krusche, C.A. etal. Desmoglein2 mutant mice
develop cardiac fibrosis and dilation. Basic Res.
Cardiol. 106, 617633 (2011).
69. Kaplan, S.R. etal. Remodeling of myocyte gap
junctions in arrhythmogenic right ventricular
cardiomyopathy due to a deletion in plakoglobin
(Naxos disease). Heart Rhythm 1, 311 (2004).
70. Sato, P.Y. etal. Loss of plakophilin2 expression
leads to decreased sodium current and slower
conduction velocity in cultured cardiac myocytes.
Circ. Res. 105, 523526 (2009).
71. Sato, P.Y. etal. Interactions between ankyrinG.,
plakophilin2, and connexin43 at the cardiac
intercalated disc. Circ. Res. 109, 193201
(2011).
72. Thiene, G. etal. Right ventricular cardiomyopathy:
is there evidence of an inflammatory aetiology?
Eur. Heart J. 12, 2225 (1991).
73. Calabrese, F., Basso, C., Carturan, E.,
Valente,M. & Thiene, G. Arrhythmogenic right
ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia: is there a
role for viruses? Cardiovasc. Pathol. 15, 1117
(2006).
74. Bowles, N.E., Ni, J., Marcus, F. & Towbin, J.A.
The detection of cardiotropic viruses in the
myocardium of patients with arrhythmogenic
right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 39, 892895 (2002).
75. Bonny, A. etal. Creactive protein in
arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/
cardiomyopathy and relationship with ventricular
tachycardia. Cardiol. Res. Pract. 2010, 919783
(2010).
76. Campian, M.E. etal. Assessment of
inflammation in patients with arrhythmogenic
right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia. Eur.
J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 37, 20792085
(2010).
77. dAmati, G., diGioia, C.R., Giordano, C. &
Gallo,P. Myocyte transdifferentiation: a possible
pathogenetic mechanism for arrhythmogenic
right ventricular cardiomyopathy. Arch. Pathol.
Lab. Med. 124, 287290 (2000).
78. Lombardi, R. etal. Genetic fate mapping
identifies second heart field progenitor cells as
a source of adipocytes in arrhythmogenic right
ventricular cardiomyopathy. Circ. Res. 104,
10761084 (2009).
79. Gittenberger-deGroot, A.C., Winter, E.M.
& Poelmann, R.E. Epicardium-derived cells
80.
81.
82.
83.
84.
85.
86.
87.
88.
89.
90.