Investigação para Remediação - Modelo de Relatório

-
PBS
Engineering +
Environmental
Remedial lnvestigation
Former Welch's Facility
1O East Bruneau
Kennewick, Washington 99336
Prepared for:
Welch's Foods, Inc.

401 Avenue B
Grandview, Washington 98930
April 2008
Project No.: 61499.00
320 N Johnson Street, Sute 100, Kennewick, WA 99336

509.735.2698 Ma in
509.735.1867 Fax
www.p bsenv.com
Forme r Weldi's Facility

Kennewick, Washington
T ABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 1
1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 2
1.1 Si te Geology/Soils ............................................................................................................ 2
1.2 General Subject Property Features ................................................................................. 2
1.3 Site History ...................................................................................................................... 2
2.0 PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS ........................................................................................... 2
2.1 Phase I Environmental Assessment ................................................................................ 2
2.2 Phase li Environmental Assessment ............................................................................... 3
2.3 lnterim Soil Excavation Remedial Action ......................................................................... 3
2.4 UST Decommissioning and Si te Assessment.. ................................................................ 3
3.0 PURPOSE ANO SCOPE ..................................................................................................... 3
4.0 FIELD METHODS ............................................................................................................... 4
4.1 Well lnstallation Procedures ............................................................................................ 4
4.2 Soil Sampling Procedures ............................................................................................... 5
4.3 Water Sampling Procedures ............................................................. ~ .............................. 5
4.4 Quality Assurance ........................................................................................................... 5
4.5 lnvestigation-Derived Wastes .......................................................................................... 5
5.0 FINDINGS ........................................................................................................................... 6
5.1 Analytical Results ............................................................................................................ 6
5.2 Soil .....................................................................................................................; ............ 6
5.3 Groundwater ................................................................................................................... 6
5.4 Focused Evaluation ......................................................................................................... 7
5.5 Conclusions .................................................................................................................... 8
5.6 lnterim Risk Evaluation .................................................................................................... 8
6.0 LIMITATIONS ..................................................................................................................... 9
FIGURES
Figure 1 - Site Location Map
Figure 2- Site Plan Showing Sample and Boring Locations
TABLES
Table 1 - Summary of Soil and Groundwater Sample Laboratory Analysis
APPENDICES
Appendix
Appendix
Appendix
Appendix
Appendix
Appendix
Appendix
Appendix
PBS
A- Site Photographs
B - Boring Logs
C - Laboratory Reports
D - Excerpts of Previos PBS Reports
E - Site Health and Safety Plan
F- Sampling and Analysis Plan
G - Groundwater Flow Direction lnformation
H - Oi I Release Quantity Approximation
Engineering +
Environmental
April2008
Remediallnvestlgatfon
FormerWelch's Facility
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This report summarize$ the environmental work performed at the 1,0East Bruneau Avenue,
Kennewick, Washington (subject prciperty or Site), and presents the results of the current Remedial
lnvestigation (RI) and PBS' findings and conclusions. The study is designed to provide
environmental information concerning the $Ubject property to evaluate compliance in accordance
. with an Agreed Order (AO) between Welch's Foods and the Washington State Department of
Ecology (WDOE).
.
.
The results of the Rl.provide a summary of work at the site, to date, and a framework for the future
Feasibility Study (FS). No further contamination was detecteQ in soil or groundwater during the field
portion of the RI work. Groundwater flow direction was determined by the RI to be northerly at a
low winter gradient. Based on analytical results, released oil at the unconfined aquifer surface has
travelled no more than 70 feet north of the contaminant release location;. a small percentage of the
total distance groundwater has tr~lVelled. Release quantities have been estimated based on the RI
and analyticQI d;:~ta .
. Following the lnterim Remedial Action at the site conducted in 2006, remaining risk.app~ars
unchanged. Additional risk assessment and recommendations concerning future work at the site
are forthcoming through the Feasibility Study (FS) ..
Engineering +
Envlronmental
.
April2006

2.2
Phase 11 Environmental Assessment
In July 2006, PBS conducted a Phase 11 onthe subject property by completing
environmental oversight of seven soil borings to groundwater with soil and water samples
collected for analysis (Project #61396.00). Soil borings were corilpleted adjacent to the
UST, lines and the shop area to the east. No contamination was observed near the tank.
Groundwater and soil contamination (in heavy oil) was detected along the UST lines to the
east of the tank. Further work was recommended to characterize and cleanup the
contamination (see Appendix D).
2.3
lnterim Soil Excavation Remedial Action
In response to the presence of heavy oil contamination from the Phase 11, in August and
September 2006, PBS oversaw excavation along the UST fuellines to the Boiler Building
(Project #61405.00). No contamination was detected and it was later determined that the
source of the leakage was immediately to the south of the lines at the location of two former
12,000 gallon bunker fuel USTs removed in the mid 1980s. lnterim remedial action
excavation proceeded at the location of the former USTs, with contaminated soil removed
and hauled to an offsite disposal facility during that project (see Appendix D). This interim
action resulted in removing a significant amount of oil from the soil and upper groundwater
table zone to reduce the amount of oil available for further oil movement with groundwater.
2.4
UST Decommissioning and Site Assessment
A Limited Underground Storage Tank (UST) Assessment was performed in September
2007, concurrent with the closure of one 50,000 gallon bunker fuel UST at 1O East Bruneau
Street, Kennewick, Washington (Project #61768.00). This project was required by the real
estate agreement between Welch's Foods and J. Lieb and is nota portion of the AO.
lnformation concerning this project is added to the RI report, because if leakage had
occurred, the scope of work concerning the RI could have been affected. Previous
assessment immediately adjacent to the UST (see Section 2.2, above) suggested that no
leakage from the UST had occurred. The decommissioning/closure was performed by K.
Kaser Company, with PBS environmental oversight.
The UST formerly contained bunker fuel, which was pumped out prior to decommissioning.
Natural gas lines close to the tank were removed to support the UST decommissioning
project. Soil sampling was completed around the tank base and in the stockpiled soil.
Samples were laboratory analyzed for heavy oil, with results indicating that no release of
fuel into the soil had occurred. The UST was closed and removed from the site for disposal
on Septembr 21, 2007. The tank basin was backfilled with clean onsite soil and offsite
structural fill after the project was completed (see Appendix D).
3.0
PURPOSE ANO SCOPE
The purpose of the RI was to provide additional soil and groundwater data to allow a more accurate
assessment of the risk posed to human health and the environment by the contamination at 1O East
Bruneau Avenue. This investigation provides further environmental information in support of
Agreed Order FS #89931898 (AO) between Welch's Foods and the Washington State Department
of Ecology (WDOE) and further supports a future feasibility study (FS) toward remedial action at the
Site.
PBS
Engineering +
Environmental
April 2008

The scope of work for the current investigation consisted of the following:
1. Collecting soil samplesconcurrently with the establishment of three monitoring wells on the
subject property near the area of the reported contamination using air rotary techniques.
2.
Analyzing the samples for heavy oil-fraction petroleLim hydrocarbons as well as a full suite
of constituents as required by the AO.
3. lnterpreting the findings with respect to Washington cleanup leveis for petroleumcontaminated sites (WAC 173-340).
4. Providing a report that includes ali information requirements listed in the AO.
5. Providing information for the future completion of a FS.
4.0
FIELD METHODS
On January 23 and 24, 2008, PBS oversaw the completion of three borings and construction of
three monitoring wells on the subject property. The w_lls were completed using a track-mounted, air
rotary drill operated by Michalson Drilling, Richland, Washington. Locations of the borings are
shown on Figure 2. A request for utilities locate was made and locations were inspected prior to
start of work. In addition, a private locate was completed on the site by A-1 Locating of Richland,
Washington.
Prior to beginning drilling, the drillers, PBS and affected J. Lieb personnel reviewed the Health and
Safety Plan (HASP) for the project (see Appendix E). The HASP provided information concerning
the location of the nearest hospital, personal protective equipment requirements, toxicity
characteristics of the contaminant and contact information. The HASP was completed prior to this
project and approved by WDOE as required by the AO.
Also in accordance with the AO, a Sampling and Analysis Plan (SAP) was completed. The SAP
provides detailed information on the location and depth of the wells, well construction specifics,
analytical procedures, contaminated soil cuttings and groundwater handling procedures, a schedule
and contact list (see Appendix F). The SAP was also approved by WDOE prior to beginning the
project. A schedule change was approved by WDOE, with that approval provided in Appendix F.
As provided in the SAP, ali sampling equipment ws decontaminated between borings and during
soil and water sampling using a detergent (Aiconox) wash and tap water rinse. Ali collected
samples were placed in an ice chest that was cooled to approximately 4 Centigrade for the
duration of the fieldwork. The samples were delivered to Friedman and Bruya Laboratory, Seattle,
Washington, and CLS Laboratory, Pasco, Washington under chain of custody documentation within
the required holding times for the analytical methods. Analytical results are provided hSection 5.1
Graphic logs of subsurface soil conditions are presented in Appendix B. Copies of ali laboratory
reports and sample chain-of-custody forms are presented in Appendix C. Results of testing are
discussed below, and are also included in Tables 1 and 2.
4.1
Well lnstallation Procedures
One major purpose of the onsite drilling was the construction of monitoring wells. Wells
were constructed in accordance with WDOE monitoring well construction regulations
provided in WAC Chapter 173-160 and 173-162. A total ofthree monitoring wells (MW-1
PBS
Engineering +
Environmental
April2008
\

through MW-3) were completed in the area of the release described in Section 2.3 above.
The flush mounted wells were placed as indicated in the SAP and completed to
approximately 27 feet below ground surface (bgs ). Groundwater was indicated to be
located approximately 20 feet bgs (see welilogs, Appendix B).
Welis were constructedwith 2" PVC casings to a depth of at least 6 feet below the surface
of the unconfined groundwater table elevation. With the use of 10 feet of screened casing,
approximately 4 feet of screen wasplaced above the unconfined water table. One weli (MW
#1) was constructed upgradient of the location of the contamination, with two welis (MW #2
and MW #3) constructed downgradient to the northwest and northeast, respectively. Wells
were constructed in such a configuration that the top of casing could be surveyed and the
surface of the groundwater table could be determined, along with groundwater flow direction
and gradient. Well surveying was completed by PBS, with an accuracy of 0.01 feet vertical
accuracy measured against a relative datum (see Appendix G).
4.2
Soil Sampling Procedures
Ali recovered soils were headspace-screened for volatile organic compounds using a
portable Mini-RAE photoionization detector (PIO). Soil samples were coliected with a drive
sampler and placed into 4-ounce glass sample jars with Teflon lid liners. The SAP calied for
collecting two soil samples per weli at approximately 1 5 and 20 feet bgs; beca use of heavy
cobbles that would not fit in a split spoon, it was not possible to coliect any samples from 20
feet bgs.
4.3
Water Sampling Procedures
Quarterly groundwater monitoring began on February 1, 2008 after the welis had been
constructed. Ali three welis were monitored and sampled. Prior to sampling monitoring
wells, water table elevations were recorded by PBS with an electronic water levei indicator.
PBS used bailers and a 12 volt submersible pump to purge and sample the monitoring
wells. Prior to sampling, each well was purged with an estimated 3 well casing volumes of
water removed. Concurrently with purging, the groundwater parameters of conductivity, pH,
and temperature were recorded with a water quality meter, until parameters stabilized.
Laboratory-manufactured conductivity and pH standard solution values were recorded
during purging to check data accuracy. Ali waste water generated from sampling and
purging was held on the property, in 5-gallon buckets, for later sampling and disposal (see
SAP - Appendix F).
.
4.4
Quality Assurance
Sample QA/QC included collecting one duplicate groundwater sample and soil sample
which were submitted to the laboratory blinq-labeled. Well #23 represents a second blindlabeled QA/QC sampling of Well #3, from water and soil samples taken at the same time as
the Well #3 sample collections. Ali results for were non-detect (see Table #1 ). Excessive
deviation between the initial and blind labeled results would be expected to trigger further
QA/QC procedures. The laboratory's daily batch quality contrai testing was also reviewed
for data quality (see SAP Appendix F).
4.5
lnvestigation-Derived Wastes
A total of six 55-gallon drums were left near a loading dock on the south side of Bruneau
Street on the J. Lieb site. The drums (containing drill cuttings) are sealed and labeled.
Analytical results suggest that those drummed soils are clean.
PBS
Engineering +
Environmental
April2008
5.0

FINDINGS
5.1
Analytical Results
Soil samples were collected during well installation, with groundwater samples collected
after the wells were developed and purged. Soil and groundwater analytical procedures
were performed as indicated in Section VIl (3) of the AO andas listed below. Testing was
designed to determine whether the following hazardous substances have been released:
benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene, xylenes (8TEX), other petroleum products, carcinogenic
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and napthalenes. Petroleum products were tested
through Northwest total petroleum hydrocarbonsdiesel method (NWTPH-Dx and NWTPHDx Extended). The list of constituents and analytical procedures is provided below:
Constituent
Petroleum Products (Oil)
Petroleum Products (heavy oil)
8enzene
Toluene
Ethyl benzene
Xylenes
PAHs
Napthalenes
Proposed Analytical Procedures

EPA Method 8015M (NWTPH-Dx)
EPA Method 8015M (NWTPH-Dx Extended)
EPA Method 80218
EPA Method 80218
EPA Method 8021 8
EPA Method 80218
EPA Method 8270C
EPA Method 8270 SIM
The results of analytical testing indicated the compounds analyzed did not exceed
laboratory detection limits in any of the soil or groundwater tested at the location of the
monitoring wells. No significant flags were observed on the laboratory data. See analytical
results provided in Table #1; attached to the report.
Further discussion concerning the known pr~sence of contamination on the site (including
the earlier assessments and interim remedial action) is provided in Section 5.5, below.
5.2
Soil
The soils encountered consisted of sand, gravei, cobbles and boulders, with minar silt (see
Logs, Appendix 8). A surface layer of asphalt was present at MW #2 and #3, with a soil
surface at MW #1. Saturated soils were encountered at depths of 19 to 21 feet bgs. There
were no field observations, photoionization detector or analytical indications of 'soil
contamination in any of the well borings associated with the RI. Further discussion of known
contamination is provided in Section 5.5, below. The laboratory results for soil are
presented in Table 1.
5.3
Groundwater
The groundwater samples were collected following completion of the wells on February 1 ,
2008 by the method described in Section 4, above. No sheen or petroleum odor was
1
observed in any of the wells constructed for this project. Table #1 provides information
concerning groundwater contaminants. A review of the earlier Phase li report indicates that
contamination is present on top of groundwater at the former location of 8oring #4 (see site
plan) immediately north of the old tanks and the point of contaminant release. Lesser
contamination was detecte~ in 8oring #7, just southeast of the former locations of the tanks.
PBS
Engineering +
Environmental
April2008

Groundwater table elevations were taken and the wells were surveyed in support of
calculating groundwater flow direction (Appendix G). The depth to groundwater was
approximately 1-foot deeper than during the summer season when the Phase li was
completed on the site. This information suggests that some irrigation water loss from canais
to the unconfined aquifer occurs during the irrigation season (April to October), increasing
groundwater table elevation during that period.
January 2008 groundwater flow direction was calculated and indicated to be approximately
North, 4 degrees East at a gradient of 0.07 feet/1 00 feet. A steepening of the gradient is
expected during the late spring season when irrigation water again begins to elevate the
water table. No pump tests or slug tests have been completed, but, based on the fact that
the soil in the upper water table zone is clean sandy gravei, some judgment concerning
hydraulic conductivity can be provided. Qualitative information for similar materiais suggests
the aquifer hydraulic conductivity approximates 100 feetlday. Using the estimated hydraulic
conductivity, known aquifer surface slope and Darcy's Law calculations, the velocity of
groundwater flow in the non-irrigation season is estimated at 14 days/foot. This figure is
expected to be a low end and the gradient will steepen in the spring allowing faster
groundwater flow (Appendix G).
5.4
Focused Evaluation
A summary of the previous environmental investigation and interim remedial action is
provided in Section 2 of this report. lnformation for this section is derived from the recent RI
boring and monitoring well work, as well as the Phase 11 (PBS Project #61396.00) and the
lnterim Remedial Action (PBS Project #61405.00). Results of the UST decommissioning _
project (PBS Project #61786.00) indicated no added soil or groundwater contamination from
that sector.
Field observation suggests that the flow velocity of the released oil is markedly slower than
the movement of groundwater. With a low end groundwater flow velocity of 14 days per foot
and 20 years of time (since the mid 1980s when the two 12,000-gallon USTs were removed)
groundwater flow would have travelled 500 feet or further. The downgradient groundwater
flow from the release would have then travelled far beyond Boring #5 and Monitoring Wells
#2 and #3.
Appendix H calculation approximate that a total of approximately 2,577 gallons of oil may
have been released to the soil and groundwater from the tanks, based on the maximum
contamination levei at 20,900 milligrams combined oil and diesel grade product per kilogram
of soil. The stated contaminant levei reflects the highest soil contamination levei detected in
the oil impacted soil prior to hauling it to a landfill during the interim remedial action.
Water is a polar molecular substance and oil is non-polar. The specific gravity of the
product is 0.97, which suggests it floats on water (field observations from the borings and
interim excavation support this information). The non-polar oil is hydrophobic with respect to
water and tends to form round globs of oil in water. Further, the hydrophobic oil tends to
form a bond with the soil and rock, with the soil providing a "refuge" from the polar water.
Based on oil specific gravity these actions take place in the upper portion of the unconfined
aquifer.
PBS
Engineering +
Environmental
April 2008Project No.: 61499.00

7

Remediallnvestigation
In effect, the soil forms a sieve, binding the oil away from the water and restricting the
distance the oil has migrated. Although the oil obviously travelled north of Boring #4, RI
information indicates it could have travelled no further than 70 feet north of the release site.
Ata high end estimate, the oil has travelled less than 14% of the distance water has
travelled in a similar time frame.
Of course any water soluble components of the oil (for example BTEX) would travei as fast
as the water; RI analytical results for volatile and semi-volatile substances indicated that
currently, no such soluble substances were detected (see Table #1 ). No soluble
substances were detected in the earlier Phase li either.
The earlier nterim remedial action was designed, in part, to lessen the free head of oil over
water and reduce the possibility of further oi I migration. During the nterim remedial action
approximately 2,261 gallons of oil (not including soil) was removed from the site, significantly
reducing risk and the probability that oil is continuing to advance in the groundwater system.
A year of quarterly monitoring and groundwater flow direction analysis could be considered
in ali three wells to help establish if the oil is soil bound and no further oil movement is
occurring.
5.5
Gonclusions
The results of the RI provide a summary of work at the site to date and a framework for the
future FS. No further contamination was detected in soil or groundwater during the field
portion of the RI work. Groundwater flow direction was determined by the RI to be northerly
at a low winter gradient. Released oil at the unconfined aquifer surface h as travelled no
more than 70 feet north of the contaminant release location; a small percentage of the
distance groundwater has travelled. Release quantities have been estimated based on the
RI and analytical data.
5.6
lnterim Risk Evaluation
At this time only a qualitative statement concerning risk is provided by PBS, beca use if an
immediate further environmental concern were detected during the RI, nterim action could
be prudent to head off contaminant uptake by any receptors.
No indication of risk, beyond what was provided in the Phase 11 and lnterim Remedial
Action, is provided. As discussed in the Phase 11, the adjacent water well on the property is
. plumbed into a confined aquifer at +400 feet below ground surface, with a positive (artesian)
pressure at the well head disallowing any contaminant entry into that system. No other
nearby wells were noted. A small amount of contamination is present under the railway
right-of-way to the south (Boring #7, approximately 7 feet south of the former leaking tanks);
with groundwater flow to the north, little further risk in that direction is indicated. The
contaminant is non-volatile sono area basement air-quality contamination intrusion is
suspected. Non-human ecological risk appears to be low because no surface contamination
is present and the contaminant has not travelled as far as the Columbia River in
groundwater.
The Conceptual Site Model and other more detailed components of risk will be addressed
during the FS portion of the project. The concept of risk has a direct bearing on the
feasibility, cost and type of remedial pathway chosen for the FS, with a focused risk
assessment scheduled for that study.
PBS
Engineering +
Environmental
Apr12008
6.0
Forme r Welch's Facility

LIMITATIONS
PBS has prpared this report for use by Welch's Foods and the Washington State Department of
Ecology in support of the AO. This report is for the exclusive use of the client and WDOE and is not
to be relied upon by other parties. lt is not to be photographed, photocopied, or similarly reproduced
in total or in part without the expressed written consent of the client and PBS.
This study was limited to the tests, locations, and depths as indicated to determine the absence or
presence of certain contaminants. The site as a whole may have other contamination that was not
characterized by this study. The findings and conclusions of this reportare not scientific certainties
but, rather, probabilities based on professional judgment concerning the significance of the data
gathered during the course of this investigation. PBS is not able to represent that the site or
adjoining land contain no hazardous waste, oil, or other latent conditions beyond that detected or
observed by PBS.
PBS ENGINEERING + ENVIRONMENTAL
Duky A. Bc::ni, R.G.

Hydrogeologist
Pri ncipaiJSenior
PBS
Engineering +
Environmental
April2008
FIGURES
O'
1,000'
2,000'
4,000'
SCALE: 1" = 2,000'
3!
WASHINGTON
PREPARED FOR: WELCH'S FOODS
~r~~~~~~P~RO~J~EC~T~#~:
F~IG~U~R~E~
61499.ooo ]1--------------~~~~~~~~-;~~----------------r-~
SITE VICINITY MAP
~
~.
\':
pBs
DATE:
SEPT. 2007
10 EAST BRUNEAU AVENUE

KENNEWICK, WASHINGTON
MW#2
MW#3
OFFICE
---'
COVERED WALKWAY
I
I
CALCULATED GROUNDWATER FLOW

DIRECTION JANUARY 2008 N4E
I
~
83
-----------,
BUNKER
FUEL
UST
[-!_
'b
I
LIMIT OF SOILI
CONTAM INATION
I
(ANO EXCAVATED
AREA #61405.000]~~
B-4
,....--r---, r---,- ,
I
_,
----------..J
I
I
I ::J
I
I 0::
I w
I :E
0::
I o
I u.
I
I
IL ___ JI
\
\
''
lii
I
I
I
I
t-
(/)
::J
WELL
I
I
0::
:E
0::
'
u..
___ J
BOILER
BUILDING
I
I
I
I
',
----l!-t /
'----\_
ESTIMATED LIMIT OF
GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION
"'ii
"'1
'
LEGEND
B3
-.1r
MW#1
BORING LOCATIONS FROM

PREVIOUS JOB #61396
!~
i
~
MONITORING WELL LOCATION
APPROXlMATE SCA LE: I" 20'
~r~~~~~P~R~O~JE~~~i~IJr----------~;;;;~~~~~~~~~~P~RE~P~A~R~E~D~F~O~R~:~W~E~L~C~H~'SfF~O;O~D~S~~
~
p Bs
61499.000
REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
FIGURE
2
~ ~--~--~------------------------~--~
~
2
~
DATE
MARCH 2008

TABLES
Table I
Chemical Constituent
------- ------.
----- --- ------------
MW-1
Water
<0.5 ug!L
Ethylbenzene
Toluene
Benzene
-------------- ------
___
..,
------ ---
Analytical Results
Soil
<0.02
MW-2
Water
<0.5 ug/L
<0.5 ug!L
<0.02
<0.5 ug!L
<0.02
Soil
<0.02
MW-3
Water
<0.5 ug!L
MW-23
Soil
<0.02
Water
<0.5 ug/L
<0.5 ug!L
<0.02
<0.5 ug!L
<0.02
<0.5 ug!L
<0.5 ug!L
<0.02
<0.5 ug/L
<0.02
<0.5 ug/L
Xylenes
<0.5 ug!L
<0.06
<0.5 ug!L
<0.06
<0.5 ug/L
<0.06
<0.5 ug!L
Acenaphthene
<0.5 mg/L
<O. OI
<0.5 mg/L
<0.01
<0.5 mg!L
<O.OI
<0.5 mg/L
Acenaphthylene
<0.5 mg/L
<0.01
<0.5 mg/L
<0.01
<0.5 mg!L
<0.01
<0.5 mg/L
Anthracene
<0.5 mg/L
<0.01
<0.5 mg/L
<0.01
<0.5 mg!L
<0.01
<0.5 mg/L
Benz a anthracene
<0.5 mg/L
<0.01
<0.5 mg/L
<0.01
<0.5 mg/L
<0.01
<0.5 mg/L
Benzo b fluoranthene
<0.5 mg/L
<0.01
<0.5 mg/L
<0.01
<0.5 mg/L
<0.01
<0.5 mg/L
Benzo g,h,i perylene
<0.5 mg!L
<0.01
<0.5 mg!L
<0.01
<0.5 mg!L
<0.01
<0.5 mg!L
Benzo k fluoranthene
<0.5 mg/L
<0.01
<0.5 mg!L
<O. OI
<0.5 mg/L
<0.01
<0.5 mg!L
Chrysene
<0.5 mg/L
<0.01
<0.5 mg/L
<0.0 1
<0.5 mg!L
<0.01
<0.5 mg!L
Dibenz a,h anthracene
<0.5 mg/L
<0.01
<0.5 mg/L
<0.01
<0.5 mg/L
<0.01
<0.5 mg/L
Fluoranthene
<0.5 mg/L
<0.0 1
<0.5 mg/L
<0.01
<0.5 mg/L
<0.01
<0.5 mg/L
Fluorene
<0.5 mg!L
<0.01
<0.5 mg!L
<0.01
<0.5 mg/L
<0.01
<0.5 mg/L
lndeno I ,2,3-cd pyrene
<0.5 mg/1
<0.01
<0.5 mg/1
<0.01
<0.5 mg/1
<0.01
<0.5 mg/1
Naphthalene
<0.05 mg/L
<0.01
/ <0.05 mg/L
<0.01
<0.05 mg/L
<0.01
<0.05 mg/L
Phenanthrene
<0.5 mg/L
<0.01
<0.5 mg/L
<0.01
<0.5 mg/L
<0.01
<0.5 mg/L
Pyrene
<0.5 mg/L
<0.01
<0.5 mg/L
<0.01
<0.5 mg/L
<0.01
<0.5 mg!L
1-Methylnaphthalene
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
2-Methylnapbthalene
<0.01
<0.0 1
<0.01
NWTPH-Dx
<0.14 mg/L
NWTPH-Dx Extended
Note:
......
<50
<0.15 mg/L
<250
<50
<0.15 mg/L
<250
<250
pH
7.48
7.57
7.70
Conductivity
572
636
629
Temperature
18.0
17.5
17.4
Depth to Water
21.35'
20.78
20.54
Soil samples collectoo from 15 to 16 feet below ground surface

Ali soils analytical results in milligramslkilogram= mglkg.
\Vater analytical results units as indicatoo in Table #I: ug/L= microgramslliter; mg/L = milligramslliter
MW-23 is laboratory blind QAIQC result for MW-3
Conductivity results in Micromhoslcm
Temperature in degrees Centigrade
Depth to water in feet
<50
<0.15 mg/L
Soil
<33
APPENDIX A
Site Photographs
Welch's Foods
Kennewick, WA
Remediallnvestlgation
PHOTO 1: LOOKING WEST AT MONITORING WELL #3 CONSTRUCTION
PHOTO 2: LOOKING NORTH WEST AT PREPARATION TO BUILD MONITORING

WELL#3
Engin eerlng +
Envlronmcntal
Apri1 2008
Welch's Foods
Kennewick, WA
PHOTO 3: DRILLING MONITORING WELL #3, LOOKING EAST
PHOTO 4: LOOKING EAST AT THE CONSTRUCTION OF MONITORING WELL #2
PBS
Enginee ring +
Envlronmental
Apri12008
4412 sw coRam
PORTL~~~3 ~REGON
PBS
{503) 248-1939
FAX
{503) 248-0223
Project Nome:
Pro ject Location:
Driller /Equipment:
Geologist/Engineer:
Sample Method:
Vi'
'-"
m
:E...:
a."
"~
o~
WeJI Canstruction Delails
B ore Hole/W ell Construction Lo g

i-----------------r-----------------,---------1
WELCH'S FOGO
10 EAST BRUNEAU AVENUE, KENNEWICK
MICHALSON
P. OANIELSON
ORIVE SAMPLER
1 of 2
TOC Elevation (feet rei ative datum): 100.67

Surface Elevotion (feet above datum): N/A
Start/End Date:
1/24/08
Hole Depth:
28.25 FEET
Outer Hole Diameter:
2 INCH PVC CASING
Sample Doto
Soil Descrip ton
FLUSHMOUNTED
Sompie
Number
0-0.5'': Surfacing is FROZEN.
CONCRETE
0.5"-3.5': Loose, brown, medium coarse SAND, moist,

non-plastic.
_2
Sheet
Boring/Well Number:
MW#1
Pro ject Number:

61499.000
1.8'
TOP OF
BENTONITE
2 _
3_
_4-
---~------------3.5'-10.5':
Very dense, brown-gray, GRAVEL with sand,
4
non-plastic, moist (cobbles and boulders starting at 3.5')
-
_5
5 _
6 _
7 _
_:_a
8 _
9 _
10_
_ 10
-g
:=.
o
1_
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -11-
10.5'-18.5': Medi um dense, gray-brown SAND with gravei,

moist, non-plastic.
_11
_12
12_
,_13
13_
;:.
"'c
C>
"o
<J:,-
...I;
"" ,_15
~
't)
14-_
,_14
'
r
/
15' TOP
OF SANO
g
~;
~
D
15_
2
MW#1
JARS 15'-15.5'
_16
16_
1-17
17_
C>
ooi
""'
18_
-----------------
18.5'-28.25': Dense, gray-browns, sandy GRAVEL, very

moist, non-plastic.
NOTES
1.
SOIL INTERFACES ANO OESCRIPTIONS ARE INTERPRETIVE ANO

ACTUAL CHANCES ANO TRANSITIONS MAY BE GRADUAL.
2.
WATER LEVEL 15 FOR DATE SHOWN ANO MAY VAR.Y 'Mll-1

TIME DF YEAR.
3. SOIL OESCRIPTIONS NOT INTENOEO TO BE USEO FOR

GEOTECHNICAL OESIGN PURPOSES.
19
MW#1
4412 SW CORBE.TT
PORTLAND, DREGON
97239
(503) 248-1939
PBS
FAX
(503) 248-0223
Project Nome:
Pro ject Locotion:
Driller /Equipment:
Geologist/Engineer:
Somple Method:
Bore Hole/Well Construction Log

~------------------------------T-------------------------------,---------------~
Sheet
Boring/Well Number:
Project Number:
61499.000
MW#1
2 of 2
WELCH'S FOOO
10 EAST BRUNEAU A VENUE, KENNEWJCK
MICHALSON
P. OANIELSON
DR/VE SAMPLER
Sample DqJa
Well Construction Details

~o
a.>
E O;
otn ..E
O>
:gE
o a.
a
-"a.
a.cc~
Sample
Number
1-22
I-2J
_24
-~
O>
Saf Descrip tion
- ~
.C:-
:58
Soil sample
attempted at 20' not co\lectable too much gravei
_21
TOC Elevotion (feet relotive dotum): 100.67

Surfoce Elevotion (feet obove datum): N/ A
Stort/End Dote:
1/24/08
Hole Depth:
28.25 FEET
Outer Hole Diometer:
2 INCH PVC CASING
QoQo
ooooo
QoQo
ooooo
QoQo
ooooo
QoQo
18.5'-28.25': Dense, gray-browns,"sandy GRAVEL, very
moist, non-plastic.
22_
2J_
24_
o
OcO
o
QoQo
ooooo
QoQo
ooooo
QoQo
. ooooo
QoQo
_25
1-26
_27
_28
21_
25_
26_
27_
28_
BOTTOM OF HOLE
_29
29 _
_ JO
JD _
J1
J1_
~~ f-J2
J2_
""~
JJ_
""E
;:;...,
1---JJ
~ 1-34
J4_
""' I-J5
J5_
"'!
g
J6_
51 f-J6
:i!
g"'
0
""
J7_
1---Jl
JB_
f-J8
~
-o
J9_
~ 1-39
~"
40
40
~~L~O~C~A~T~10~N~:~5~3'~VVE~~S~TO~F~B~O~IL~E~RB~U~I~L~D~IN~G~AL._O~N~G~S~O~U~T~H~F~E~N~C~E~.--------------------~--------------------.:~~
C>
6C.>
NOTES
c:~
"'
:z
6<(
,:
~~
1.
SOIL INTERFACES AND DESCRIPT10NS ARE IN1ERPRET1VE AND

ACTUAL CHANGES ANO TRANSITIONS MAY BE GRADUAL.
2.
WATER LEVEL IS FOR DATE SHOWN ANO MAY VARY V..TH

TIME OF YEAR.
3. SOIL DESCRIPT10NS NOT INTENOED 10 BE USEO FOR

GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN PURPOSES.
MW#1
4412 SW CORBETI
PORTLAND. OREGON
97239
PBS
(503) 248-1939
FAX
(503) 248-0223
Project Nome:
Project Location:
Driller /Equipment:
Geologist/Engineer:
Sample Method:
Vi'
Well Construction Details
""'
:S....;
a."
<1>.,!'
Cl'-..o
f--1
f--2
Sheet
1 of 2
Boring/Well Number:
MW#2
Project Number:
61499.000
WELCH'S FOGO
10 EAST BRUNEAU AVENU[, KENNEW/CK
MICHALSON
P. DANIELSON
DRIVE SAMPLER
TOC Elevation (feet rei ative datum): 100.03

Surface Elevotion (feet obove datum ): N/A
Start/End Date:
1/24/08-1/25/08
Hole Depth:
30:1 FEET
2 INCH PVC CASING
Sample Data
Soil Descrip tion
FLUSHMOUNTED
,. . -, ;v
~l
Bore Hole/VVell Construction Log

~~----------~------------------.---------------------------------.---------------~
0/
'
CONCRETE
r 1.a
TOPOF
BENTONITE
0-0.5'': Surfacing is ASPHALT.

0.5"-5.5': Sandy GRAVEL, dense to very dense, brown,
moist, medium-coarse sand, non-plastic.
1_
2_
f-J
J _
__ 4
4_
5_
f-5
e..--6
__ 7
7 _
__ 8
B_
9 _
__ 10
10_
-- 11
11_
"'
1---12
12_
""
f-1J
1J_
1---14
14_
,K
E
~
i-.i
o
C>
g~
~
"
"'
-~
(/)
f--15
C)
NOTES
1.
SOIL INTERFACES ANO OESCRIPTIONS ARE INTERPRETIVE ANO

AClUAL CHANGES ANO TRANSITIONS MAY BE GRADUAL.
2.
WAlER LEVEL IS fOR DATE SHOWN ANO 1.4AY VARY WITH

TIME Of YEAR.
3. SOIL DESCRIPTIDNS NOT INTENOED TO BE USEO FOR
MW#2
4412 SW CORBETT
PORTLAND, OREGON
97239
PBS

~--------------------------------,------------------------------------.-----------------1
(503) 248-1939
Pro ject Nome:

Pro ject Locotion:
Driller /Equipment:
Geologist/Engineer:
Somple Method:
WELCH'S FOOD
10 EAST BRUNEAU AVENUE, KENNEWICK
MICHALSON
P. DANIELSON
DRI VE SAMPLER
We/1 Construction Detaifs
Sheet
Boring/Well Number:
MW#2
Pro ject Number:

61499.000
FAX
(503) 248-0223
2 of 2
TOC Elevotion (feet relotive dotum): 100.03

Surfoce Elevotion ( feet obove dotum): N/ A
Stort/End Dote:
1/24/08-1/25/08
Hole Depth:
30.1 FEET
Outer Hole Diometer:
2 INCH PVC CASING
Sampfe Dota
u
"i;,
O>
~E
~ ~~
Soil Description
:S
Sample
Number
:::;
QoQo
0oOo
QoQo
0oOo
QoQo
oo{Jo
QoQo
ooo{Jo
QoQo
0o0o
QoQo
oOoOo
QoQo
0oOo
QoQo
0
c--21
18.5'-28.25': Dense, gray-browns, sandy GRAVEL, very

moist, non-plastic.
21_
22_
23_
24_
25_
e--26
_27
26_
27_
_28
28_
BOTIOM OF BOLE
_29
29 _
_ 30
30_
31_
.o -31
.[
E
32_
~ ._J2
~J
g 1--JJ
33_
""
o
~ f--34
34_
~"'
35
35_
_36
36 __
~ _37
37_
L__
~,---0
__J
si
:-;;
:!.
i"'
38_
_38
"E
39_
_39
:'?
f)
C:J
gt-4~0~----------------------------~------~--~------~----------------------------------------------------..40~~
;!:
tO
NOTES
C>
co
5z
~
:>
s~
1.
SOIL INTERFACES ANO OESCRIPllONS ARE INTERPREllVE ANO
ACTUAL CHANGES ANO TRANSITIONS MAY BE GRADUAL
2.
WATER LEVEL IS FOR DATE SHOWN ANO MAY VARY WITH
liME OF YEAR.
3. SOIL DESCRIPllONS NOT INTENDED TO BE USED FOR
MW#2
4412 SW CORBETI
PORTLAND, OREGON
97239
(503) 248-1939
PBS
Well Construction Detai/s
WELCH'S FOGO
10 EAST BRUNEAU AVENU[, KENNEW/CK
MICHALSON
P. OANIELSON
OR/V[ SAMPLER
TOC Elevation (teet relative datum): 99.60

Surface Elevation (feet above datum): N/A
Start/End Date:
1/25/08
Hole Depth:
27.5 FEET
2 INCH PVC CASING
Sample Data
"'
{jE
FLUSHMOUNTED
Sheet
1 of 2
Boring/Well Number:
MW#3
Pro ject Number:

61499.000
FAX
(503) 248-0223
Project Nome:
Pro ject Loca t ion:
Driller /Equipment:
Geologist/Engin eer:
Sample Method:
B ore Hole/'\7\T ell Con.stmction. Lo g

~------------------------------,-------------------------------.----------------1
iE ~!
Soil Descrip tion
Sample
Number
0-0.5'': Surfacing is ASPHALT.

0.5''-7': Dense, gray sandy GRAVEL, damp, non-plastic.
t-I
1_
r-2
2_
~J
J_
r-4
4_
f-5
5_
r-6
_7
_8
8-'-
_9
9 _
_ 10
10_
"@ -11
11_
::::;,
gE _12
12_
13_
14 __
16_
1718_
NOTES
1.
SOIL INTERFACES ANO DESCRIPTIONS ARE INTERPRETIVE ANO

AClUAL CHANCES ANO TRANSITIONS MAY BE GRADUAL.
2.
WATER LEVEl IS FOR DATE SHOYI'N ANO MAY VARY WITH

TI!-4E OF YEAR.
3. SOIL OESCRIPTIONS NOT INTENDEO TO BE USEO FOR
GEOTECHNICAL OESIGN PURPOSES.
MW#3
4412 SW CORBEIT
Bore Hole/Well Const:ruct:ion Log
PORTLAND, OREGON
97239
~-------------------------------,,---------------------------------~--------------~
PBS
(503) 248-1939
FAX
(503) 248-0223
Project Nome:
Pro ject Location:
Driller /Equipment:
Geol og ist/En g in eer:
Sample Method:
Well Canstruction Details
Boring/Well Number:
MW#3
Pro ject Number:

61499.000
WELCH'S FOGO
1O EAST BRUNEAU A VENUE, KENNEWICK
MICHALSON
P. OANIELSON
ORIVE SAMPLER
Sheet
2 of 2
TOC Elevation (feet relative datum): 99.60

Surface Elevation (feet above datum): N/A
Start/End Date:
1/25/08
Hole Depth:
27.5 FEET
2 INCH PVC CASING
Samp/e Data
Soil Description
Som p/ e
Number
_21
t::~r~
A=;
21
OoOo
QoQ>
0oOo
QoQo
0oOo
QoQo
0oOo
QoQo
0oOo
QoQo
0oOo
QoQo
0o0o
QoQo
19'-27.5': Brown-gray, GRAVEL with sand, dense, moist,

non-plastic.
_22
21_
22_
_2J
2J_
_24
24_
_25
25_
_26
:;~.= . ~
_27
~~~
_28
:;:
DF SCREEN
26_
27--
BOTTOM OF HOLE
28_
~:~":;,]
-~~t
.:~:
.~
..
29_
:~~
~
v
_JO
BOTT01.4
-!o
.':t
_29
6"
JO__,
-1
-- J1
J1_
f-J2
J2_
1-JJ
JJ_
f-J4
J4_
ui 1- J5
J5'-
,[
c
o
o
"'o
N
g
"
.s"'
(9
_,o
J6_
$ 1-JB
:li
n
~ f-J7
J7-
.,.
t
"
"E
:!'
J8_
r- J8
J9_
f- J9
e:,
~ . .-4~0~. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .~------~--~------~. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4~0~~
<t
~
8
co
~
;-
g~
__________________________
:.;..:;;;..,.
NOTES
1.
SOIL INTERFACES ANO OESCRIPTlDNS ARE INTERPRETIVE ANO

ACTUAL CHANCES ANO TRANSITlONS MAY BE GRADUAL.
2.
WATER LEVEL IS FOR OATE SHOWN ANO MAY VARY WJTH

T11.4E Of YEAR.
.J. SOIL DESCRIPllONS NOT INTENDEO TO BE USEO FOR

GEOTECHNICAL OESIGN PURPDSES.
MW#3
___,
APPENDIX C
Laboratory Reports
Chain-of-Custody Documentation
FRIEDMAN & BRUYA, INC.

ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
3012 16th Avenue West
Seattle, W A 98119-2029
TEL: (206) 285-8282
FAX: (206) 283-5044
e-mail: fbi@isomedia.com
J ames E. Bmya, Ph.D.

Charlene Monow, M.S.
Yelena Aravkina, M.S.
Bradley T. Benson, B.S.
Kurt Johnson, B.S.
February 1, 2008
Paul Danielson, Project Manager

PBS Engineering and Environmental, Inc.
320 N. Johnson St., Suite 100
Kennewick, WA 99336
Dear Mr. Danielson:
Included are the results from the testing of material submitted on J anuary 25, 2008
from the 61499.00, F&BI 801242 project. There are 10 pages included in this report.
Any samples that may remain are currently scheduled for disposal in 30 days. If you
would like us to return your samples or arrange for long term storage at our offices,
please contact us as soon as possible.
We appreciate this opportunity to be ofservice to you and hope you will call ifyou
should have any questions.
Sincerely,
~\
')
c_
~-~r--~
Eric Young
Project Manager
Enclosures
PBS0201R.DOC

CASE NARRATIVE
This case narrative encampasses samples received on January 25, 2008 by Friedman &
Bruya, Inc. from the PBS Engineering and Environmental61499.00, F&BI 801242
project. Samples were logged in under the laboratory ID's listed below.
Laboratory ID
801242-01
PBS Engineering and Environmental

MW-1
All quality contrai requirements were acceptable.

Date ofReport: 02/01108

Date Received: 01/25/08
Project: 61499.00, F&BI 801242
Date Extracted: 01/28/08
.:Pa!~Aua~~.zed: 01/28/08
RESULTS FROM THE ANALYSIS OF THE SOIL SAMPLES

FOR BENZENE, TOL UENE, ETHYLBENZENE, AND XYLENES
USING EPA METHOD 8021B
Results Reported on a Dry Weight Basis
Results Reported as mg/kg (ppm)
Sample ID
Benzene
Toluene
Ethyl
Benzene
Total
Surrogate
Xylenes (% Recovery)
Laboratory ID
MW-1
(Limit 50-150)
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.06
63
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.06
70
801242-01
Method Blank

ENVlRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Date of Report: 02/01108

Project: 61499.00, F&BI 801242
Date Extracted: 01125/08
Date Analyzed: 01/25/08
RESULTS FROM THE ANALYSIS OF THE SOIL SAMPLES

FOR TOTAL PETROLEUM HYDROCARBONS AS
DIESEL AND MOTOR OIL
USING METHOD NWTPH.:Dx
Results Reported on a Dry Weight Basis
Results Reported as mg/kg (ppm)
Surrogate
Sample ID
Laboratory ID
MW-1
Diesel Range
Motor Oil Range
(% Recovery)
(C10-C25)
(C25-Ca6)
(Limit 53-144)
<50
<250
91
<50
<250
95
801242-01
Method Blank

Analysis For Semivolatile Compounds By EPA Method 8270C SIM

Client Sample ID:
Date Received:
Date Extracted:
Date Analyzed:
Matri:X:
Units:
MW-1
01/25/08
01/25/08
01/30/08
Soil
mg/kg (ppm)
Surrogates:
Anthracene-d1 O
Benzo(a)anthracene-d12
Compounds:
Naphthalene
Acenaphthylene
Acenaphthene
Fluorene
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Fluoranthene
Pyrene
Benz(a)anthracene
Chrysene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene
1-Methylnaphthalene
2-Methylnaphthalene
Client:
Project:
Lab ID:
Data File:
Instrument:
Operator:
Lower
Limit:
50
35
% Recovery:
118
101
Concentration
mg/kg (ppm)
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<O.O:j.
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01

61499.00, F&BI 801242
801242-01 1/5
013014.D
GCMS6
YA
Upper
Limit:
150
159

Analysis For Semivolatile Compounds By EPA Method 8270C SIM

Client Sample ID:
Date Received:
Date Extracted:
Date Analyzed:
Matrix:Units:
Client:
Project:
Lab ID:
Data File:
Instrument:
Operator:
Method Blank
Not Applicable
01/25/08
01/25/08
Soil
mg/kg (ppm)
Surrogates:
Anthracene-d10
Benzo(a)anthracene-d12
Compounds:
Naphthalene
Acenaphthylene
Acenaphthene
Fluorene
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Fl uoranthene
Pyrene
Benz(a)anthracene
Chrysene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fiuor anthene
1-Methylnaphthalene
2-Methylnaphthalene
Lower
Limit:
50
35
% Recovery:
117
95
Concentration
mg/kg (ppm)
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01

61499.00, F&BI 801242
08-122 mb2 115
012514.D
GOMS6
YA
Upper
Limit:
150
159

ENVlRONMENTAL CHEMISTS
Date of Report: 02/01/08

Project: 61499;00, F&BI 801242
QUALITY ASSURANCE RESULTS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF SOIL SAMPLES

-FOR BENZENE~ TULUENE,ETHYLBENZENE,-ND 'XYLENES -usiNG EPA: METHOD 8021B
Laboratory Code: 801242-01 (Duplicate)
Analyte
Benzene
Toiuene
Ethyibenzene
Xyienes
Reporting Sampie Result

Units
mg/kg (ppm)
<0.02
mg/kg (ppm)
<0.02
mg/kg (ppm)
<0.02
mg/kg (ppm)
<0.06
Duplicate
Result
<0.02
<0.02
<0.02
<0.06
Reiative Percent
Difference
(Limit 20)
nm
nm
nm
nm
Laboratory Code: Laboratory Contrai Sampie
Analyte
Benzene
Toiuene
Ethyibenzene
Xyienes
Reporting
Units
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
Spike
Levei
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.5
Percent
Recovery
LCS
98
98
98
96
Acceptance
Criteria
70-130
70-130
70-130
70-130


Date Received: 01125/08
Project: 61499.00, F&BI 801242
QUALITY ASSURANCE RESULTS FROM THE ANALYSIS OF SOIL SAMPLES

FOR TOTA:C-pETROLEUM HYDR<JCARBONS AS--DIESEL EXTENDED USING METHOD NWTPH-Dx
Laboratory Code: 801250-07 (Matrix Spike)
Analyte
Diesel Extended
Reporting
Units
mglkg (ppm)
Spike
Level
5,000
Sample
Result
(Wet wt)
<50
Percent
Recovery
MS
105
Percent
Recovery
MSD
109
Laboratory Code: Laboratory Control Sample
- - Analyte
Diesel Extended
Reporting
Units
mg!kg (ppm)
Spike
Level
5,000
Percent
Recovery
LCS
98
Acceptance
Criteria
70-129
Acceptance
Criteria
71-137
RP
(Limit 20)
4


Project: 61499.00, F&BI 801242
QUALITY ASSURANCE RESULTS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF SOIL

SAMPLESFOR PNA'S BY-EP.A~ETHOD-827oC-SIM- -Laboratory Code: 801242-01 (Duplicate)
Analyte
Naphthalene
2-Methy lnaphthalene
1-Methylnaphthalene
Acenaphthylene
Acenaphthene
Fluorene
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Fluoranthene
Pyrene
Benz(a)anthracene
Chrysene
Benzo (h )fluoranthene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Indeno(1, 2, 3-cd)pyrene
Dibenz(a,h)antbracene
Reporting
Units_
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
_mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mglkg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mglkg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
Sample
Result
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
Duplicate
Result
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
Relative Percent
Difference
(Limit 20)
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
nm
Laboratory Code: 801242-01 (Matrix Spike)
Analyte
Naphthalene
2-Methylnaphthalene
1~ Methylnap hthalene
Acenaphthylene
Acenaphthene
Fluorene
Phenanthrene
__ _ Anthracene
Fluoranthene
Pyre~e
Benz(a)anthracene
Chrysene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(g, h,i)perylene
Reporting
Units
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mglkg (ppm)
mg/k:g (ppm)
mg~g >P1ll) _
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
Spike
Level
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
Sample
Result
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
Percent
Recovery
MS
87
86
91
82
83
89
97
87
91
90
70
78
78
83
72
91
91
91
Acceptance
Criteria
50-150
50-150
50-150
16-167
58-108
57-113
30-138
42-132
45-145
44-139
17-134
10-157
37-123
28-134
55-115
61-104
69-100
60-105

Date of Report: 02/01108

Date Received: 01125/08
Project: 61499.00, F&BI 801242
QUALITY ASSURANCE RESULTS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF SOIL

-SAMPL~S-FOR PNA'SHY EPAMETHOD-8270C-SIM
Laboratory Code: Laboratory Control Sample
Analyte
Naphthalene
2-Methylnaphthalene
1-Methylnaphthalene
Acenaphthylene
Acenaphthene
Fluo rene
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Fluoranthene
Pyrene
Benz(a)anthracene
Chrysene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Reporting
Units
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
mg/kg (ppm)
Percent
Recovery
LCS
80
77
78
78
77
86
88
83
83
81
65
70
76
78
69
96
89
86
Spike
Levei
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
Percent
Recovery
LCSD
82
79
82
79
78
89
90
85
84
82
66
71
79
80
71
98
91
88
Acceptance
Criteria
72-112
60-114
74-118
68-112
70-111
69-110
68-111
67-110
68-114
68-114
58-108
64-115
54-111
54-119
61-123
46-126
57-119
60-116
RPD
(Limit 20)
2
3
5
1
1
3
2
2
1
1
2
1
4
3
3
2
2
2

Data Q.ualifiers & Definitions

a- The analyte was detected ata levelless than five times the reporting limit. The RPD results may not
pro vide reliable information on the variability of the analysis.
Al- More than one compound of similar molecule structure was identified with equal probablility.
b - The analyte was spiked at a levei that was less than five times that present in the sample. Matrix
spi:ke recoveries niay not be meaningfi.il~ ..
ca - The calibration results for this range fell outside of acceptance criteria. The value reported is an
estimate.
c - The presence of the analyte indicated may be due to carryover from previous sample injections.
d - The sample was diluted. Detection limits may be raised due to dilution.
ds - The sample was diluted. Detection limits are raised due to dilution and surrogate recoveries may
not be meaningful.
dv- Insufficient sample was available to achieve normal reporting limits and limits are raised
accordingly.
fb- The analyte indicated was found in the method blank. The result should be considered an estimate.
fc - The compound is a common laboratory and field contaminant.
hr - The sample and duplicate were reextracted and reanalyzed. RPD results were still outside of control
limits. The variability is attributed to sample inhomogeneity.
ht- The sample was extracted outside of holding time. Results should be considered estimates.
ip - Recovery fell outside of normal controllimits. Compounds in the sample matrix interfered with the
quantitation of the analyte.
j- The result is belownormal reporting limits. The value reported is an estimate.
J - The internai standard associated with the analyte is out of controllimits. The reported concentration is
an estimate.
jl- The analyte result in the laboratory control sample is out of controllimits. The reported
concentration should be considered an estimate.
jr - The rpd result in laboratory control sample associated with the analyte is out of controllimits. The
reported concentration should be considered an estimate.
js - The surrogate associated with the analyte is out of controllimits. The reported concentration should
be considered an estimate.
lc - The presence of the compound indicated is likely due to laboratory contamination.
L- The reported concentration was generated from a library search.

nm - The analyte was not detected in one or more of the duplicate analyses. Therefore, calculation of the
RPD is not applicable.
pe --:: T}le_ sample was received in a container not approved by the method. The value reported should be
considered an -estimate.

pr- The sample was received with incorrect preservation . .The value reported should be considered an
estimate.
ve - The value reported exceeded the calibration range established for the analyte. The reported
concentration should be considered an estimate.
vo - The value reported fell outside the controllimits established for this analyte.
x - The pattern of peaks present is not indicative of diesel.
y- The pattern ofpeaks present is not indicative of motor oil.
10
8'0~.
SAMPLEC~~
!:L
R~port To ~ ~,~c.l ScJ\c\

Company
fgs lf"~+E,..v~
-;end
Address
S'l..o /\J",j~~ Q-_
City, State, .ZIP

Phone#
S?)'
S"'~ loo
~~,-r;k. Wfi- ~31(;,.
"7"1-/ O'd'1'1Fax#
c;,'1'7 ~'5_:.(6"1
OFCUSTODY
. H6
Otj~ s-(og
~-y 80j
Pa~e,#
o{
TURNAROUND TIME
~dard (2 Weeks)
RUSH ______________
sh charges. autborized by:
SAMPLE DISPOSAL
Dispose after 80 days
Return samples
Will call with instructions
.
.
LABORAT(JAd REPORT
RJ LeeGl'Oup, Inc. I Center for Laboratory Sciences

2710 Nortl1 20tl1 Avenue, Pasco WA 99301
Te!: (509) 545-4989 I Fax: (509) 544-6010
PBS Environmental- Kennewick, W A

320 N. Johnson #100
Kennewick, WA 99336
Attn: Paul Danielson
Phone: (509) 735-2698
Fax: (509) 735-1867
RJ Lee Group Job No.:

Samples Received:
Report Date:
Analysis/Prep Date
Client Project:
Purchase Order No.:
WA020220080001
2/1/2008
2/13/2008
2/6/2008
61499
Analysis:
Sample ID
MW-1
WA020220080001-001
MW-1
W A020220080001-001
MW-1
W A020220080001-001
MW-1
W A020220080001-001
MW-1
WA020220080001-001
MW-1
WA020220080001-001
MW-1
WA020220080001-001
MW-1
WA020220080001-001
MW-1
WA020220080001-001
MW-1
W A020220080001-001
MW-1
WA02022008000l-001
MW-1
WA020220080001-001
MW-1
WA020220080001-001
MW-1
WA020220080001-001
MW-1
WA020220080001-001
MW-1
W A020220080001-001
Page 1 of 6
Sample Collection
2/2/2008
Analyte
Benzene
2/2/2008
Ethylbenzene
2/2/2008
Toluene
2/2/2008
Xylenes
2/2/2008
Acenaphthene
2/2/2008
Acenaphthy Iene
2/2/2008
Anthracene
2/2/2008
Benz (a) anthracene
2/2/2008
Benzo (b) fluoranthene
2/2/2008
Benzo (g,h,i) p~rylene
2/2/2008
Benzo (k) fluoranthene
2/2/2008
Chrysene
2/2/2008
Dibenz (a,h) antluacene
2/2/2008
Fluoranthene
2/2/2008
Fluorene
2/2/2008
lndeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene
Matrix/Method
EPA624
Non-Potable Water
EPA624
Non-Potable Water
EPA624
Non-Potable Water
EPA624
Non-Potable Water
EPA 8270
Non-Potable Water
EPA 8270
Non-Potable Water
EPA8270
Non-Potable Water
EPA 8270
Non-Potable Water
EPA 8270
Non-Potable Water
EPA 8270
Non-Potable Water
EPA8270
Non-Potable Water
EPA8270
Non-Potable Water
EPA 8270
Non-Potable Water
EPA 8270
Non-Potable Water
EPA 8270
Non-Potable Water
EPA 8270
Non-Potable Water
Units
11YL
Result
< 0.50
Qualifier
Reporting Limit
0.50
Jlg/L
<0.50
0.50
Jlg/L
< 0.50
0.50
Jlg/L
< 0.50
0.50
mg!L'
< 0.50
0.50
mg!L
< 0.50
0.50
mg!L
< 0.50
0.50
mg!L
<0.50
0.50
mg!L
< 0.50
0.50
mg!L
< 0.50
0.50
myt
<0.50
0.50
mg!L
< 0.50
0.50
mg!L
< 0.50
0.50
mg!L
< 0.50
0.50
mg!L
< 0.50
0.50
mg!L
< 0.50
0.50
LABORATL~ ...
REPORT
R] Lee Group Job No.: WA020220080001

320 N. Johnson #100
Kennewick, W A 99336
Phone: (509) 735-2698
Fax: (509) 735-1867
Sarnples Received:
Report Date:
Analysis/Prep Date
Client Project:
Purchase Order No.:
2/1/2008
2/13/2008
2/6/2008
61499
Analysis:
Page2 of 6
Sample ID
MW-1
W A020220080001-001
MW-1
WA020220080001-001
MW-1
W A020220080001-001
MW-1
W A020220080001-001
Sample Collection
2/2/2008
Analyte
Naphthalene
2/2/2008
Phenanthrene
2/2/2008
Pyrene
2/2/2008
TPH-Dx
MW-2
W A020220080001-002
MW-2
W A020220080001-002
MW-2
WA020220080001-002
MW-2
W A020220080001-002
MW-2
WA020220080001-002
MW-2
W A020220080001-002
MW-2
WA020220080001-002
MW-2
W A020220080001-002
MW-2
WA020220080001-002
MW-2
WA020220080001-002
MW-2
WA020220080001-002
MW-2
W A020220080001-002
MW-2
W A020220080001-002
MW-2
W A020220080001-002
2/2/2008
Benzene
2/2/2008
Ethylbenzene
2/2/2008
Toluene
2/2/2008
Xylenes
2/2/2008
Acenaphthene
2/2/2008
Acenaphthylene
2/2/2008
Anthracene
2/2/2008
Benz (a) anthracene
2/2/2008
2/2/2008
Benzo (g,h,i) perylene
2/2/2008
2/2/2008
Chrysene
2/2/2008
Dibenz (a,h) anthracene
2/2/2008
Fluoranthene
MatrixfMethod
EPA8270
Non-Potable Water
EPA8270
Non-Potable Water
EPA8270
Non-Potable Water
NWTPH-Dx
Non-Potable Water
Units
EPA624
Non-Potable Water
EPA624
Non-Potable Water
EPA624
Non-Potable Water
EPA 624
Non-Potable Water
EPA8270
Non-Potable Water
EPA8270
Non-Potable Water
EPA8270
Non-Potable Water
EPA8270
Non-Potable Water
EPA8270
Non-Potable Water
EPA8270
Non-Potable Water
EPA8270
Non-Potable Water
EPA8270
Non-Potable Water
EPA 8270
Non-Potable Water
EPA8270
Non-Potable Water
mWL
Result
< 0.050
Qualifier
Reporting Limit
0.050
mtVL
< 0.50
0.50
mWL
< 0.50
0.50
mWL
<0.14
0.14
llw'L
< 0.50
0.50
llw'L
<0.50
0.50
llw'L
< 0.50
0.50
l't%
< 0.50
0.50
mtVL
< 0.50
0.50
mtVL
< 0.50
0.50
mWL
< 0.50
0.50
mWL
< 0.50
0.50
mWL
< 0.50
0.50
mWL
< 0.50
0.50
mWL
< 0.50
0.50
mWL
< 0.50
0.50
mtVL
< 0.50
0.50
mw'L
< 0.50
0.50
LABORAT .....t REPORT

RJ LeeGroup Job No.:
Samples Received:
ReportDate:
Analysis/Prep Date
Client Project:
Purchase Order No.:

320 N. Jolmson #100
Phone: (509) 735-2698
Fax: (509) 735-1867
WA020220080001
2/1/2008
2/13/2008
2/6/2008
61499
Analysis:
Page3 of 6
Sample ID
MW-2
W A020220080001-002
MW-2
WA020220080001-002
MW-2
WA020220080001-002
MW-2
WA020220080001-002
MW-2
W A020220080001-002
MW-2
W A020220080001-002
Sample Collection
2/2/2008
Analyte
Fluorene
2/2/2008
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene
2/2/2008
Naphthalene
2/2/2008
Phenanthrene
2/2/2008
Pyrene
2/2/2008
TPH-Dx
MW-3
W A020220080001-003
MW-3
WA020220080001-003
MW-3
W A020220080001-003
MW-3
WA020220080001-003
MW-3
W A020220080001-003
MW-3
WA020220080001-003
MW-3
W A020220080001-003
MW-3
W A020220080001-003
MW-3
WA020220080001-003
MW-3
W A020220080001-003
MW-3
WA020220080001-003
MW-3
WA020220080001-003
2/2/2008
Benzene
2/2/2008
Ethylbenzene
2/2/2008
Toluene
2/2/2008
Xylenes
2/2/2008
Acenaphthene
2/2/2008
Acenaphthy Iene
2/2/2008
Anthracene
2/2/2008
Benz (a) anthracene
2/2/2008
2/2/2008
2/2/2008
2/2/2008
Chrysene
Matrix/Method
EPA8270
Non-Potable Water
EPA 8270
Non-Potable Water
EPA8270
Non-Potable Water
EPA8270
Non-Potable Water
EPA8270
Non-Potable Water
Units
mgfL
Result
< 0.50
Qualifier
Reporting Limit
0.50
mgfL
< 0.50
0.50
mgfL
< 0.050
0.050
mgfL
< 0.50
0.50
mgfL
< 0.50
0.50
NWTPH-Dx
mgfL
< 0.15
0.15
!JgfL
< 0.50
0.50
!JgfL
< 0.50
0.50
!JgfL
< 0.50
0.50
!JgfL
< 0.50
0.50
mgfL
< 0.50
0.50
mgfL
< 0.50
0.50
mgfL
< 0.50
0.50
mgfL
< 0.50
0.50
mgfL
< 0.50
0.50
mgfL
< 0.50
0.50
mgfL
< 0.50
0.50
mgfL
< 0.50
0.50
Non-Potable Water
EPA624
Non-Potable Water
EPA624
Non-Potable Water
EPA624
Non-Potable Water
EPA624
Non-Potable Water
EPA8270
Non-Potable Water
EPA 8270
Non-Potable Water
EPA8270
Non-Potable Water
EPA8270
Non-Potable Water
EPA8270
Non-Potable Water
EPA8270
Non-Potable Water
EPA8270
Non-Potable Water
EPA8270
Non-Potable Water
LABORAT.a.d REPORT
320 N. Johnson #100
Kennewick, WA 99336
Phone: (509) 735-2698
Fax: (509) 735-1867

Samples Received:
Report Date:
Analysis/Prep Date
Client Project:
Purchase Order No.:
WA020220080001
2/1/2008
2/13/2008
2/6/2008
61499
Analysis:
Page4of6
Sarnple ID
MW-3
W A020220080001-003
MW-3
WA020220080001-003
MW-3
W A020220080001-003
MW-3
WA020220080001-003
MW-3
WA020220080001-003
MW-3
W A020220080001-003
MW-3
W A020220080001-003
MW-3
WA020220080001-003
Sample Collection
2/2/2008
Analyte
2/2/2008
Fluoranth~ne
2/2/2008
Fluorene
2/2/2008
2/2/2008
Naphthalene
2/2/2008
Phenanthrene
2/2/2008
Pyrene
2/2/2008
TPH-Dx
MW-23
WA020220080001-004
MW-23
WA020220080001-004
MW-23
WA020220080001-004
MW-23
WA020220080001-004
MW-23
W A020220080001-004
MW-23
WA020220080001-004
MW-23
WA020220080001-004
MW-23
W A020220080001-004
MW-23
W A020220080001-004
MW-23
WA020220080001-004
2/2/2008
Benzene
2/2/2008
Ethylbenzene
2/2/2008
Toluene
2/2/2008
Xylenes
2/2/2008
Acenaphthene
2/2/2008
Acenaphthylene
2/2/2008
Anthracene
2/2/2008
Benz (a) anthracene
2/2/2008
2/2/2008
MatrixjMethod
EPA 8270
Non-Potable Water
EPA8270
Non-Potable Water
EPA8270
Non-Potable Water
EPA 8270
Non-Potable Water
EPA 8270
Non-Potable Water
EPA8270
Non-Potable Water
EPA 8270
Non-Potable Water
NWTPH-Dx
Non-Potable Water
Units
m,y'L
Result
< 0.50
EPA624
Non-Potable Water
EPA624
Non-Potable Water
EPA624
Non-Potable Water
EPA624
Non-Potable Water
EPA8270
Non-Potable Water
EPA8270
Non-Potable Water
EPA 8270
Non-Potable Water
EPA8270
Non-Potable Water
EPA8270
Non-Potable Water
EPA8270
Non-Potable Water
Qualifier
Reporting Limit
0.50
m,y'L
< 0.50
0.50
m,y'L
<0.50
0.50
m,yL
<0.50
0.50
m,y'L
< 0.050
0.050
m,y'L
<0.50
0.50
m,y'L
< 0.50
0.50
m,y'L
< 0.15
0.15
ll!Y'L
< 0.50
0.50
ll!Y'L
< 0.50
0.50
ll!Y'L
<0.50
0.50
11!?/L
< 0.50
0.50
mglL
< 0.50
0.50
m,y'L
< 0.50
0.50
m,yL
< 0.50
0.50
m,y'L
< 0.50
0.50
m,y'L
< 0.50
0.50
m,yL
< 0.50
0.50
LABORATOi\. REPORT
320 N. Jolmson #100.
Phone: (509) 735-2698
Fax: (509) 735-1867

Sarnples Received:
Report Date:
Analysis/Prep Date
Client Project:
Purchase Order No.:
WA020220080001
2/1/2008
2/13/2008
2/6/2008
61499
Analysis:
Sample ID
MW-23
WA020220080001-004
MW-23
WA020220080001-004
MW-23
WA020220080001-004
MW-23
W A020220080001-004
MW-23
W A020220080001-004
MW-23
W A020220080001-004
MW-23
WA020220080001-004
MW-23
W A020220080001-004
MW-23
WA020220080001-004
MW-23
W A020220080001-004
Sample Collection
2/2/2008
Analyte
2/2/2008
c:hrYsene
2/2/2008
2/2/2008
Fluoranthene
2/2/2008
Fluo rene
2/2/2008
2/2/2008
Naphthalene
2/2/2008
Phenanthrene
2/2/2008
Pyrene
2/2/2008
TPH-Dx
MW-23
WA020220080001-004
1/25/2008
TPH-Dx
MatrixjMethod
EPA8270
Non~Potable Water
EPA8270
Non-Potable Water
EPA8270
Non-Potable Water
EPA8270
Non-Potable Water
EPA 8270
Non-Potable Water
EPA8270
Non-Potable Water
. EPA 8270
Non-Potable Water
EPA8270
Non-Potable Water
EPA8270
Non-Potable Water
NWIPH-Dx
Non-Potable Water
Units
my'L
Result
< 0.50
my'L
< 0.50
0.50
my'L
< 0.50
0.50
my'L
< 0.50
0.50
my'L
< 0.50
0.50
. < 0.50
0.50
my'L
< 0.050
0.050
my'L
< 0.50
0.50
my'L
< 0.50
0.50
my'L
< 0.15
0.15
NWIPH-Dx
Solid
m!0<g
<33
33
my'L.
Qualifier
Reporting Limit
0.50
* Ali solid matricies reported on a dry weight basis unless otherwise noted.
*Ali values reported without blank correction unless otherwise noted
Analyst Comrnents:
Report Qwzlifiers:
E= Val11e above q11mztitation range
B = Analyte detected izz tlze nssociated Met/zod Blmzk
S = Spike Recovery outside accepted recaven; limits.
H= Holdiug times for preparation ar mzalysis exceeded
J= Analyte delected below qunntitation limits
R= RPD (rei ative percent diffirence) outside accepred recovery limits
N = Azzalyte uot NELAC certifted
L = Sample canditimz at receipt ont of compliance witlz metlzod dejined conditiorzs
NELAC-Natioual
Page 5 of 6
E1~vironmental
Laboratary Accreditntiou Confr:reuce
LABORATO~REPORT

320 N. Johnson #100
Phone: (509) 735-2698
Fax: (509) 735-1867

Samples Received:
Report Date:
Analysis/Prep Date
Client Project:
Purchase Order No.:
WA020220080001
2/1/2008
2/13/2008
2/6/2008
61499
Analysis:
Sample ID
Sample Collection
'
Analyte
Matrix/Method
Units
Result
Qualifier
Reporting Limit
Tllese results nre subwitted pursunut to RJ'Lee Group's current terms tmd conditions ofsnle, inclnding t/Je company's stnndnrd runrrnnty mtd limitntion oflinbility provisimlS. No responsi!Jility or linbility is assnmedfor Ute mnmJer in wl!icll Ute results nre used
or interpreted. Unless notifted in writing to return Ute snwples covered by this repor!, RJ Lee Group willstore UJe snwples for n period of 1/tirh; (30) dnys before discnrding. A sl!ipping nnd !Jnndling fte will be assessed for lhe relllrn of nny smuples. Unless
othenvise noted snmples were recieved in nit ncceptnble cmzdition.
Tlzis reporl uury not be. used to clnim prodztct endorsemeut by ruzy lnborntory nccrediting ngl!1ICIJ. Tire results contnined in tl1is reportrelnte only to tlJe items tested or to tire snmple(s) as received by lhe lnborntonj. Any reproduction oftllis docmuent must be in full
for 1/Je repor/ to be vnlid.
Qunlihj Control dntn is Vnilnble upon reqnest.
AuthorizedSignature
Project Manager:
Page 6 of 6
'-1t \_.
,.1 ' :
;- o.
n
'<)Jf'\__;l. >:.A....u\,_..
i. 'l'.l'l ('\;''
Ms. Marisol Avila
CLS
~
~ '~
t
'
uJA O~DJJ.Co~CCD (
".
~,
'
.:.
"I
,:
-/
Center wr Laboratory Sciences
;1'0up, Inc.
RJT
,"!
,'
Center for Laboratory Sciences

2710 North 20t:hAvenue, Pasco, WA 99301
Tel: (509) 545-4989 I Fax: (509) 544-6010
Request for Laboratory Analytical Services

Chaiu ()f Custody
,.
Pagc
Trnaroiiiul
Rt!1JIIcsl
o[
CC06004 Rcv. 02
. Dlan.!. AStanard TA L< 1lmnnal; Pli:rm Do Nr11 Use l'agu< Trn!.< Li ~
No?
!f 'No,' No. of Busin!!.~S Da s: ":::>
Smn le Pu ose: Info!llJJition D Rcl!lllatorv D
r=="'""--b:f'<-'"--'==-;r-';--7='-""""-'-'-,...,-----,.-'--:-:----::----------~-------!Drinking IYati!r S stem ID.No;

Rport
R~ulli
To
Phooc:
Cal! with Verbal Results:
Sitmp/e Only DOI~ Sourc:eNo;.

fM~u~k~re~So~u~~=~~N~o~s-~:----------------------~
Sample Puf]losc: A?. B 1 Otbi:r 7
F:t:
EmailRcsull~To:
0>&
Fi!X Resul!s To:
I
~f J
Namc:
'JT/.l
Companv:
flb<:"'~A J . ~
\)o.,..:A 1~ 1'e( 'id'
)A.A.-1..1<.( ~
Pr=m!liaa:
Unpn:s H,SO,
J) @_
Chi'IIIistry 4'C
Ana!J'Sis Kcy HNO
--.
Em:t
HO
'
Othr:r
NoOH
Motr!x:
IVW=Wouitw:llcr
GW=Groudwiltor
S=SoiUStudgc
E=Exlr.!ct
X=Oihcr
Na,SO,
c.
"
fa.~:
-:;o
0::,..
"
"~
:3''-'
Jnst111dions
,;
~.:.---T-
JYtw- I
fr/LJ-
mw--.3
Chalnof
C11rtody
IBv (Print Namcl:'-
-"- -'-'-! By (Sil!llature):
'V
~~
I Bv (Print Namcl:
Companv Name:
Qucstions?
Cotitnct Client Scrvices:
(724) 387-1833
Date:
-z,.jt/08
Tlffie:~:;.u~
!To:
5
1f 1
't :bt'tV"~f)rutt"
01
0.
Dnlc:
Tlioc:
350 Hochbcrg Road

Monrocville; PA 15146
Tcl:(724)3Zs-l776
Fax: (724) 733-i 799
Custoy
530 MCoimir:k Street

San Leandro; CA 94577
Tel: (5IOJ 567-0480
Fa"<: (510) 567-0488
o
:z:
S"
7
~
Clrainof
Clrafnof
co
Clutody
W\Y[ Rclinguishcd To:

;f.f_/ Jh Mctbod Ol1ii11Jlmcot
""
;
Mcthod-ot ~mpment:
./i41tt
:I:
c.
~ . ~v-1 ..,.-..
_,/u-&e
dBy!Sil!nature):
- I vf'-vr ~c..J.--
c"
'
c..V'0"vt~
LJ.JAH.J
z.. '3
:E
"'
~vrt..-4 ~
jl:ompany Name:
Clrainof
Ciutoy
J._},;;b.
~nw---z..3
/h.J,V-
-1
&..Nv/et/'
2.
-~
;;
!!
i/Jd!?
LJakY-
e:
"
c::........
CJ
Phonc:
Conbiccr:
l'=Pl:tStic
G=Gbss
W=Wipe
A=Ais (filtcr or tubt)
SW=Surfoce\Votr:r
DW=Driitl:ing Wokr
O=Oil
ICo01pany Nmne:
Mclhod oi ~IUprnent
!Rcecived Bv (Sii!IU!ture):
IRticcived Bv_fllrfut_Namcl:
IComiJany Namc:
Date:
Relinouishcd To:
Mcthod oi :.mpmcm:
10503 BatUevicw Pnrkw-ay
Ttmc:
2710 North 20th Avcnuc
Manassas; VA 20109
Pasco, WA 99301
Te!: (70J) 368-7880

Fax: (703) 368-7761
Te!: (509) 545-4989

Fa~: (509) 544-6010
Page 1 of 4
ChemLIMS
RJ Lee Group, Inc.

Customer Name: PBS Environmental - l(ennewicl<, WA
Purchase Order:
Project: 61499.00
Comment:
Order,ID: WA020220080001
Or der Date: 02101 /2008
Order Entered By: Glynnis Bowman
Samples
Sample ID:
WA020220080001 '001
Customer Sample ID: MW-1
Si te:
Collector: client
Date/Tlme Collected: 02/0212008 12:00 PM

Padfic Standard Time
DateiTime Received: 02/01/2008 03:30PM

Pacific Standard Time
Matrix: NonPotableWater
Quantity: 1120.0000000000ml
Priority: 5 day
Preserva tive:. Nane
Sample Entered By: Glynnis Bowman

Comment:
Sub-Sample ID
WA020220080001-00101
WA020220080001 '00102.
Test
Total Pet Hydrocarbons
- Diesel.by NWTPH-Dx
Polynuclear Aromatic
Hydrocarbons by EPA
82.70
Naphthalene by EPA
8270
Hydrocarbons by EPA
132.70
WA02022.0080001-00103
BTEX by EPA 62.4
Analyte
TPH-Dx
Method
NWTPHDx
Fluoranthene
EPA.82.70
Preparation
Liquid.to Liquid
Extraction
'EPA3510C
Atenaphtherie
Naphthalene
Anthracene
Benz (a)anthracene
Phenanthrene
Naphthalene
EPAB270
EPA 82.70
EPA 8270
EPA 82.70
EPA 8270
EPA 8270
EPA 3510C
EPA 3510C
EPAJ510C
EPA 3510C
EPA 3510C
EPA 3510C
lnden (1,2,3-cd)
pyrene
EPA.82.70
EPA3510C
EPA 8270
EPA 132.70
EPA 82.70
EPA 82.70
EPA 82.70
EPA 82.70
EPA 82.70
EPA 82.70
EPA 82.70
EPA 62.4
EPA 3510C
EPA 3510C
EPA 3510C
EPA 3510C
EPA 3510C
EPA 35tOC
EPA 3510C
EPA 3510C
EPA 3510C
Analysis Preparation
EPA 62.4
EPA 624
EPA 62.4
Anatysis Preparation
Amlysis Preparation
. Benzo (g,h,i) perylene

Chrysene
Fluorene
.do not use
Acenaphthylene
Benzo (I<) fluoranthene
Pyrene
Benzene
Xylenes
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Sample ID:
WA02.02.2.0080001 '002
Customer Sample ID: MW-2.
Si te:
Collector: client
Daterrime Collected: OZ/02./2008 12.:00 PM

Daterrime Received: 02/01/2008 03:30PM

Matrix: Non-Po_table Water
Quantity: 1120.0000000000mL
Prlority: 5 day
Preservative: Nane

Comment:
httn//1 Q? 1 nR 100 "i/moilnlenonun.nlm?module=l:ims&na~re=customers/orders/index ]o~rinr...
2/1/2008
ChemLIMS
Sub-Sample ID
WA020220080001-00201
WA0202200BOOO 1 00202
Page 2 of 4
Test
-Diesel by NWTPH-Dx
Hydrocarbons by EP A
8270
Naphthalene by EPA
8270
Hydrocarbons by EPA
8270
WA020220080001-00203
.BTEX by EPA 624
Analyte
TPH-Dx
Method
NWTPH-Dx
Fluorene
EPA8270
Preparation
Liquid to Liquid
Extraction
EPA3510C
Chrysene
Fluoranthene
Acenaphthylene
Pyrene
Phenanthrene
Benz (a) anthracene
Naphthalene
Naphthalene
EPA 8270
EPA 8270
EPA 8270
EPA 8270
EPA 8270
EPA 1!270
EPA 8270
EPA 8270
EPAB270
EPA3510C
EPA3510C
EPA 351 OC
EPA 3510(
EPA 3510(
EPA 351.0C
EPA 3510C
EPA3510C
EPAJ510C
Anthracene
EPA 8270
EPA 351 OC
do.not use
Dibenz (a, h) anthracene
Acenaghthene
lndeno (1,2,3-cd)
pyrene
Benzo (b)fluoranthene
Ethylbenzene
ERA 8270
EPA 8270
EPA B270
EPA 8270
EPA
EPA
EPA
EPA
EPA8270
EPA 8270
EPA 624
EPA 3510(
EPA3510C
Xylenes
Toluene
Benzerie
EPA 624
EPA 62.4
EPA 624
AnaWsis Preparation
3510C
3510C
3510C
3510C
Sample lO:
WA020220080001003
Customer Sample ID: MW3
Site:
Collector: client
Datefrime Collected: 0210212008 12:00 PM

Datefrime Received: 02/01/1008 03:30 PM

Pacifc Standard Time
Matrix:. Non-Potable Water
Quantlty: 1120.0000000000mL
Priorlty: 5 day
Preservatlve: Nane
SampleEntered By: Glynnis Bowman

Comment:
Sub-Sample ID
WA020220080001-003
01
WA020220080001-00302
Test
Diesel by NWTPH-[)x
Hydrocarbons by EPA
6270
Naphthalene by EPA .
1!270
Hydrocarbons by EPA
8270
Analyte
TPH-Dx
Me~hod
Phenanthrene
EPA8270
Preparation
Uquid to Liquld
Extraction
EPA 3510C
Fluo rene
Anthracene
Dil:reni. (a,h) anthracene
Pyrene.
Chrysene
1--laphthalene
EPA 8270
EPA 8270
EPA 8270
EPA 8270
EPA 8270
EPA8270
EPA 8270
EPA3510C
EPA 3510C
EPA 3510(
EPA 3510C
EPA3510C
EPA 3510C
~PA 3510C
Benzo (g,h, i) perylene
EPA 8270
EPA 3510C
do not use
lndeno (1,2,3-cd)
pyrene
EPA 8270
EPA 8270
EPA 3510C
EPA 3510C
NWTPH-Dx
hthl'//1 Q?.l tR 1 00_')/morlnlenonun.nlm?module=lims&narre=customers/orders/index lo!!inr...
2/1/2008
ChemLIMS
Page 4 of 4

Comment:
Sub-.Sample ID
WA02022DOB0001-00501
Test
Diesel by NWTPH-Dx
An~lyte
TPH-Dx
Method
NWTPH-Dx
Preparation
Dry Weight
SAMPLE CONDITION RECORD

Suffident sample for the requested tests.7 yes
Custody seals lntacton shipping containers? yes
Sampl temperature 4"C 2? yes
coe .present? yes
Samples in proper container? yes
Air samples - ls a known blank lnduded? n/a
coe signed when rellnqulshed and received? yes
Shipplng contalners ingood conditlon when recelved? yes
Are ali samples for volatile organic analyses free of headspace? yes
TAT marl<ed on COC? yes
Samples received within the holding time? yes
Bottle caps tight and securely fn place? yes
coe agreeswjth sample labels? yes
.
Sample containers intact when 'received? yes
Custody seals intact on sample contalners? n/a
Hex Chromtum Air Samples - are samples from spray paint operations? n/a
h+tno //1 O'J 1 f\ R 1 00 -'\/,,,nrll11P1vmnn nhn?mnnnlP.=l-im~~.n:HJf~=r.m~tnnlf'.n::/nniers/index
1o0m.__
?_/1 /200R
Page 2 of5
fluoranthene
Dibenz (a,h)
anthracene
Pyrene
WA020220080001- BTEX by EPA 624 Benzene
001-03
Xylenes
Toluene
Ethylbenzene
Sample ID:
WA020220080001-002
Collector: client
EPA 3510C
EPA 8270
EPA 624
EPA 3510C
EPA624
EPA624
EPA 624
Site:
Date/Time Collected:
02/02/2008 12:00 PM Pacific
Standard Time
Date/Time Received: 02/01/2008

03:30PM Pacific Standard Time
Priority: 5 day
Preservative: None
Matrix: Non-Potable Water
Comment:
Sub-Sample ID
Test
Analyte
WA020220080001- TotalPet
TPH-Dx
002-01
HydrocarbonsDiesel by NWTPHDx
WA02022008000 1- Polynuclear
Fluorene
002-02
Aromatic
Hydrocarbons by
EPA 8270
Chrysene
Fluoranthene
Acenaphthylene
Pyrene
Benzo (k)
fluoranthene
Phenanthrene
Benz (a) anthracene
Naphthalene
Naphthalene
N aphthalene by
EPA 8270
Polynuclear
Anthracene
Aromatic
Hydrocarbons by
EPA 8270
do not use
Dibenz (a,h)
anthracene
Acenaphthene
Indeno (1,2,3-cd)
pyrene
flpf/r\nnr.nmP:nt~
EPA 8270
Quantity: 1120.0000000000mL
Method
NWTPH-Dx
Preparation
Liquid to Liquid
Extraction
EPA8270
EPA3510C
EPA 8270
EPA 8270
EPA 8270
EPA8270
EPA 8270
EPA 3510C
EPA 3510C
EPA3510C
EPA 3510C
EPA3510C
EPA 8270
EPA 8270
EPA 8270
EPA 8270
EPA 3510C
EPA 3510C
EPA 3510C
EPA 3510C
EPA 8270
EPA 3510C
EPA 8270
EPA 8270
EPA 3510C
EPA 3510C
EPA 8270
EPA 8270
EPA 3510C
EPA 3510C
::mrl ~P:ttimr~\n::ml\T .ocal ~ettin!:!s\Temnorarv Internet Files\OLK72\RJL...
2/4/2008
Page 3 of5
Benzo (g,h,i)
pe1ylene
Benzo (b)
fluoranthene
W A02022008000 1- BTEX by EP A 624 Ethylbenzene
002-03
Xylenes
Toluene
Benzene
EPA 8270
EPA 3510C
EPA 8270
EPA 3510C
EPA624
EPA 624
EPA 624
EPA 624
Sample ID:
WA020220080001-003
Site:
Collector: client
02/02/2008 12:00 PM Pacific
Standard Time

03:30 PM Pacific Standard Time
Matrix: Non-Potab1e Water
Quantity: 1120.0000000000mL
Priority: 5 day
Preservative: None

Comment:
Sub-Sample ID
Test
Analyte
WA020220080001- Total Pet
TPH-Dx
Hydrocarbons003-01
Diesel by NWTPHDx
Phenanthrene
WA020220080001- Polynuclear
003-02
Aromatic
Hydrocarbons by
EPA 8270
Fluorene
Anthracene
Benzo (b)
fluoranthene
Dibenz (a, h)
anthracene
Pyrene
Chrysene
N aphthalene
Naphthalene by
EPA 8270
Benzo (g,h,i)
Polynuclear
Aromatic
perylene
Hydrocarbons by
EPA 8270
do not use
Indeno (1,2,3-cd)
pyrene
Acenaphthylene
Acenaphthene
Naphthalene
Benz (a) anthracene
fil~//'\Dnr.nm~nts ~mel
Method
NWTPH-Dx
Preparation
Liquid to Liquid
Extraction
EPA 8270
EPA 3510C
EPA 8270
EPA 8270
EPA 8270
EPA 3510C
EPA 3510C
EPA 3510C
EPA 8270
EPA 3510C
EPA 8270
EPA 8270
EPA 8270
EPA 3510C
EPA 3510C
EPA 3510C
EPA 8270
EPA 3510C
EPA 8270
EPA 8270
EPA 3510C
EPA 3510C
EPA 8270
EPA 8270
EPA 8270
EPA8270
EPA 3510C
EPA 3510C
EPA 3510C
EPA 3510C
Settinrs\mml\T .ocal Setting:s\Temnorarv Internet Files\OLK72\RJL...
2/4/2008
Page 4 of5
Benzo (k)
fluoranthene
Fluoranthene
WA02022008000 1- BTEX by EP A 624 Toluene
003-03
Ethylbenzene
Benzene
Xylenes
EPA 8270
EPA 3510C
EPA 8270
EPA624
EPA 3510C
EPA624
EPA624
EPA624
SampleiD:
WA02022008000 1-004
Site:
Collector: client
02/02/2008 12:00 PM Pacific
Standard Time

03:30PM Pacific Standard Time
Priority: 5 day
Preservative: Nane
Matrix: Non-Potable Water
Comment:
Sub-Sample ID
Test
Analyte
TPH-Dx
004-01
Hydrocarbons - .
Diesel by NWTPHDx
WA020220080001- Polynuclear
Benz (a) anthracene
Aromatic
004-02
Hydrocarbons by
EPA 8270
Benzo (g,h,i)
perylene
Acenaphthylene
Dibenz (a, h)
anthracene
Chrysene
do not use
Indeno (1,2,3-cd)
pyrene
Naphthalene
Naphthalene by
EPA 8270
Polynuclear
Fluorene
Aromati c
Hydrocarbons by
EPA 8270
Anthracene
Acenaphthene
Naphthalene
Pyrene
Phenanthrene
Benzo (k)
fluoranthene
fllp//r\no"llmPnt~ !'tnrl SP.ttinp-~\mml\T .or-~1
Quantity: 1120.0000000000mL
Method
NWTPH-Dx
Preparation
Liquid to Liquid
Extraction
EPA 8270
EPA 3510C
EPA 8270
EPA 3510C
EPA 8270
EPA 8270
EPA 3510C
EPA 3510C
EPA 8270
EPA 8270
EPA 8270
EPA 3510C
EPA 3510C
EPA 3510C
EPA 8270
EPA 3510C
EPA8270
EPA 3510C
EPA 8270
EPA 8270
EPA 8270
EPA 8270
EPA8270
EPA 8270
EPA 3510C
EPA 3510C
EPA 3510C
EPA 3510C
EPA 3510C
EPA 3510C
SettinQ"s\Temnorarv Internet Files\OLK72\RJL...
2/4/2008
Page 5 of 5
Benzo (b)
fluoranthene
Fluoranthene
WA02022008000 1- BTEX by EP A 624 Benzene
004-03
Toluene
Xylenes
Ethylbenzene
Sample ID:
WA02022008000 1-005
Collector: client
EPA 8270
EPA 3510C
EPA 8270
EPA624
EPA 3510C
EPA 624
EPA624
EPA624
Site:
Date/Time Collected: 01/25/2008 Date/Time Received: 02/01/2008

12:00 PM Pacific Standard Time 03:30PM Pacific Standard Time
Priority: 5 day
Preservative: None
Matrix: Solid
Coinment:
Sub-Sample ID
Test
Analyte
TPH-Dx
Hydrocarbons 005-01
Diesel by NWTPHDx
Quantity: 500.0000000000g
Method
NWTPH-Dx
Preparation
DryWeight
SAMPLE CONDITION RECORD

Sufficient sample for the requested tests? yes
Custody seals intact on shipping containers? yes
Sample temperature 4C 2? yes
coe present? yes
Samples in proper container? yes
Air samples - Is a known blank included? n/a
coe signed when relinquished and received? yes
Shipping containers in good condition when received? yes
Are ali samples for volatile organic analyses free of headspace? yes
TAT marked on COC? yes
Samples received within the holding time? yes
Bottle caps tight and securely in place? yes
coe agrees with sample labels? yes
Sample containers intact when received? yes
Custody seals intact on sample containers? n/a
Hex Chromium Air Samples - are samples from spray paint operations? n/a
filp//r\nol"'llrnPnt<~
llnrl
.~Pttino-~\mml\T .nr.~ 1 Settino-s\Temnorarv
Tntemet Files\OLK72\RJL...
2/4/2008
C-L'
--~~~~
i'
-~~
Q1,
~ ~--"''"~
RJ LeeG1'oup, Inc.
s~
~'
Center for Laboratory Sences

2710 North 20th Avenue, Pasco, WA 99301
Tel: {509) 545-4989 I Fax: {509) 544-6010
{ m>,
,,
m-"-
'f,'i rJn
~-"'y'"'
~r
Center for Laboratory Sciences
_Request for Laboratory Analytical Services

Chain-ofCustody
/'
P!.gt: - - - -
oC
CC06004 Rev. 02
,l
Ycs
Blank, A Sia~~rlanl TA i.r,l.uunu:d; /'/'"'" ,....... ~-
,rennsLi!~-
!f 'No.' No. ofE
No 7
Re1!Uialorv D
~~~~~~~-=~~~-,----------~--~------------------------------~----~n~-~ws~'
Rrport
RI!S!ts
Othcr 'i
To
rn:so:rv:~lio~~:
Cail ivilh Vcibal Resnhs:
fp_
nb.;_,_.,. _ ~
FnxRcsulL~To:
I
\)~ l~c'e.['i.,...
Namc:
P/.LA,/ I JAA... ,.e_(~.......
EmailResultsTo:
Cornpany:
l&ndlnPOiuTo Aildress:-
Sp<d~l
~
-
CJ&
-()
P~S
City.Sf.!lo,Zip:
Phooo:
(
Emaili
,.,J::..,
JL
--
~
)
Fnx:
h! I.. / -
2.
I
l
mw--3
ntW-
2'3
/htv--2-3
SomplcDcsc:riptlon
L - - -... ~,
Sto11
WlpeArea/Air
1 Volnme
t-l~b._.
wp,)cy'-_
("d
. Date:
IRelingL~hed Bv (Sil!lmturel: B"i:Clzlb3 ,1 f f,j

n0-'' ,_,_ ,..,
"L-/.!LO!f,
__, MA: Z-iti"'i>
Dak
i')'tff_Rclinquishl'tl To:
:H /Jb Mcthod ofSbipmont:
350 Hochberg Road

Monroevillc, PA 15146
Te!: (724) J2j-1776
Fnx: (724) 733-1799
IICI
NoOil
Na,SO,
Cont:Iiuer.
S=SoiVSiw!go
SW=Surf:ce Wntor
DW=Drinking W:t!cr
O=Oil
E=Exuoct
X=O!bcr
IJ1
Anlysi5Requertod
~
~ k ;:F
.~
~~~~~
~ ~ ~ ~~
~ .....;;)
J':PilStic
G=Gbss
W=\17pc
fl=ir (mti:r ar tuh<)
~ I"
~
~-
.2
5c
g~
c
~
"'
"c.
-g
~
...
s"cc
:!:
c.
vr--~~c....V
~
5'
c..f/vrvr~
vr!./f ._..
s-5"
;;-r
nine: .:;:
IT:
MoUmd ofShipment:
.fi-/
HNO,
O!bor
1 1
ll,SO,
r...Yvfvl._...
J/u-;b~
~t..-,-
Companv Name:
Question.~?
Stnrt
/_,.,-J.;.;b''
Conlact Client Scrviccs:

(724)387-1833
..
2-J,Jt$
{_.h,k,..,.
lplj~
Relinmii<hodBv(PrinlNnmc\:'
Compnily Name:
I Snmjllc
Dte 1
4'C
(
.
f'Vt w-
Chaiuof
Cll!toJy
AnalySISliey
Somplclcntloatlon
Cirainof
Custoy
a,.;,;,~'!'
Unpn:s
11'-'trli.:
IVW=W:.stC>I~tcr
~OOJ-y;..__.
Time:
530 McCormick S!reet

San Leandro, CA 94577
TCI: (~10) 567'0480
Fa~: (5 10) 567-0488
I;
Clrailrof
CustoJy
roitrof
Custoy
Date:
~1111Y Namc:
10503 Battlcvicw Parkwny

Manassas, VA 20109
Tcl: (703) 368-7880

Fnx: (703) 368-7761
Tnne:
_________.:;R:::cl:::oinquishcd To:
Melhod ol ~mprucnt
2710 Nartli20lh Avenuc
Pasco, WA 9930 I
Te!: (509) 545-4989
Fnx: (509) 544-60 I O
APPENDIX D
Excerpts of Previous PBS Reports
PORTLAND
SEATTLE
PBS
VANCOUVER
EU GENE
BEND
August 16,2006
TRI-CITIES
Mr. Dallas Beamer

Lieb Foods, Inc
2550-D 23rd Avenue
P.O. Box 389
Forest Grove, OR 97116
Re:
LIMITED UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK (UST) ASSESSMENT, PCBs

INSPECTION AND WELL WATER REVIEW AT WELCHS FOODS, 10 EAST
BRUNEAU, KENNEWICK, WASHINGTON
PBS PROJECT NlJMBER #61396.00
Dear Mr. Beamer:

In August 2006, at your request PBS Engineering and Environmental (PBS) completed a Limited
UST Assessment, PCBs fuspection and well water review at the Welchs property. This report
provides a summary of the assessment results.
BACKGROUND
Food processing has occurred at the plant location since approximately 1925. During a portion o f
that time a 50,000-gallon bunker fuel UST system has been providing fuel to power the boiler
system. At this time the UST system only provides badcup power, with the main heating
supplied by natural gas. An earlier UST assessment was completed by others in January 2006,
with results not providing information on groundwater. Bank: of the W est engaged PBS during
June of 2006 to complete a Phase I Environmental Assessment on the property, with results of
that assessment recommending further work to assess groundwater and soil near the UST system
and fuellines.
Recent information indicates that 2 - 12,000 gallon USTs containing bunker fuel were removed
from the site between 1974 and 1978. The location of those units were 120 feet east of the
southwest comer of the subject property, with the pump unit on the south side of the two north
oriented USTs. Excavation based remedial action has begun to remove bunker fuel contaminated
soil related to those USTs .
. FIELD METHODS
The fieldwork for this assessment was conducted from July 31 to August 11, 2006; with a utility
locate completed on the property prior to beginning work. After arrival on the property, Welchs
personnel, PBS and the drilling contractor reviewed the location of the UST and underground
fuellines as well as other utilities in the area prior to beginning drilling.
After the si te was checked for utility locations, air rotary Tubex system drilling was provided by
Environmental West Exploratio~, Spokane, Washington to sample soil adjacent to the UST, lines
ENGINEERING ANO ENVIRONMENTAL
320 N. Johnson Si.

Sute 700
Kennewick, WA 99336
509.735.2698 PHONE
509.735.1867 FAX
www.pbsenv.com
Lieb Foods, Inc.

August 16, 2006
PBS Project #61396.00
Page 2
and maintenance area of Building #4. Seven borings, with sampling, were completed. Drill
holes were completed at the locations shown on Figure l. Mter the borings were completed and
the samples were collected, the boles were backfilled with bentonite. Soil samples were collected
into4-ounce glassjars, with water ~amples collected with disposable bailers into 40 ml vials and
12 liter amber bottles. All samples were shipped in iced coolers -to a certified -environmental
laboratory, within the required holding time ofthe chosen analytical method.
PBS logged the borings in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System; see
attached boring logs. In general, materiais encountered in the borings included a surface layer of
asphalt or grass. Various mixtures of sandy gravei and sand were present in most o f the borings
to approximately 25 feet below ground surface at the base ofthe borings. See the attached boring
logs for further information. Groundwater was encountered in the borings at between 20 and 23
feet below ground surface.
LABORATORY RESULTS
Ali samples were submitted to Friedman and Bruya Laboratory in Seattle, Washington for
analysis by total petroleum hydrocarbons- hydrocarbon identification method; (NWTPH-HCID)
a qualitative procedure to identify the fraction and type of hydrocarbon in the sample. Other
analysis was completed for total petroleum hydrocarbons.- diesel extended method (NWTPHDx) and volatile organic constituents (VOCs). Table -1 provides a summary of analytical results
for the UST assessment; fuel contamination was encountered in borings #4 and #7 as indicated
below. The laboratory report is attached following this report.
TABLEl
ANALYTICAL RESULTS
ND
ND
8260 Constituents
AllND
AllND
AllND
AllND
AllND
AllND
AllND
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Gasoline
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Diesel
ND
ND
ND
16,000
ND
ND
1,300
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
. <50
ND
ND
ND
Oil
ND
ND
ND
20,000
ND
ND
1,700
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
<250
ND
ND
ND
NA
NA
NA -Variable
NA -Variable
100/30*
1.0/0.8*
2,000
0.5
2,000
0.5
Sample/Depth
B1 (water)
B2 (water)
B3 (water)
B4 (water)
B5 (water)
B6 (water)
B7 (water)
B116-17.5'
B1 21-22.5'
Bl24-25.5'
B219-20S
B220.5-22'
B3 15-16'
B3 20.5-22'
B4 20.5-22'
B5 20.5-22'
B6 13-15'
B7 14-15'
NWTPH:HCID
ND
ND
ND
NA
ND
ND
NA
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Cleanup Leveis Soil

Cleanup Leveis Water
ND
Detect Diesel
ND
Lieb Foods, Inc.

August 16, 2006
Page 3
NOTES:
Unless indicated, all sample matrix materiais are soil.
WDOE - MTCA Method A Cleanup leveis for each constituent are indicated in the last line.
Bolded munbers mdicate ana1ysis eX.ceeding cleanup leveis
Allanalyticalresultsareinmilligrams/kilogram(mg/kg) c~tiL-kv
llkt'c.ro'iy;-r/.J!..) ;?d.
ND - Material not detected.
NA - indicates not applicable or not analyzed.
* = The Method A cleanup levei for gasoline is 100/1.0 mglkg or 30/0.8 mg/kg if benzene is present
Groundwater is second number.
See Figure I for boring/sample locations.
;.,
CONCLUSIONS
Analytical results mdicate that petroleum hydrocarbon impact above Washington State
Department of Ecology (WDOE) Model Toxic Control Act (MTCA) Method A cleanup leveis
were found in groundwater sampled at the Welchs site from Borings #4 and #7. Field indications
of bunker fuel contamination were observed in both borings. The fuel was encountered only in
groundwater, with no soil contamination above the water table elevation encountered. Boring #4
was located approximately one foot north of the existing bunker fuellines and at the north end of
the former 12,000-gallon USTs on the property. Boring #7 was approximately 25 feet south of
the existing bunker fuellines and 18 feet southeast of the south side of the fonner UST pump
house. The larger amount of contamination was observed in Boring #4, which was judged to be
downgradient of the confmned leaks that occurred in the lines and pump house of the earlier
12,000 gallon USTs. No leakage was suspected from the current 50,000 gallon UST and piping
system.
No contamination was detected in Boring #5, which was approximately 80 feet downgradient
from the suspected leak locations. No contamination was detected in Borings #1, #2 and #3
which were adjacent and downgradient from the existing onsite 50,000 gallon UST. Boring #6
was completed further east on the site, immediately north of the Building #4 machine shop to
check for leakage from that area. No contamination was detected in Boring #6, suggesting that
no contaminants had escaped from that area.
PCBsiSSUES
In support of the project, PBS completed a review of onsite privately owned transformers and
capacitors to check for PCBs. Mr. Gary Splattstoesser, of Benton County PUD, aided in the
review. PBS walked through the facility and observed approximately 7 floor mounted oil-less
transformers. In addit1on, approximately 10 -50 KVA capacitors were observed in the various
production areas on the site. Several of the capacitors in the southwest portion of Building #4
were indicated to contain Areovox - Supemol transformer oil. The Supemol oil was indicated to
be non-PCBs containing. No other PCBs containing fixtures were observed on the site; no PCBs
issues with transformers or capacitors are suspected. Individual fluorescent ballasts were
examined for PCBs in the maintenance shop area of Building #4 (the oldest building onsite);
labels on the ballasts observed indicated "No PCBs". Checking alllight ballasts was beyond the
scope of the project, but results at this time suggest that "No PCBs" ballasts will be present
throughout.
Lieb Foods, Inc.

August 16, 2006
Page4
WATER SUPPLY WELL ISSUES
. One -pr~duction- suppfy well is-located immediately west of the Boiler Building. Well
construction data indicates the well is 548 feet deep, with unperforated casing to 365 feet below
ground surface in basalt bedrock. Six pounds of artesian pressure is present at the well head.
Laboratory analytical data was provided to PBS by Welchs, with analysis for inorganic
chemicals, synthetic organic chemicals, metais, pesticides, herbicides, petroleum chemicals,
volatile organic chemicals, trihalomethanes, semi-volatiles, PCBs and dioxins. Detected
constituents included fluoride (0.9 mg/1), sulfate (50 mg/1), sodium (100 mg/1), hardness (11
mg/1), total dissolved solids (319 mg/1), conductivity (503 umhos/cm) and turbidity (0.5 NTUs);
ali results are within regulatory MCLs. The detected dioxins constituent (2,3,7,8 - TCDD)
indicated a concentration of 203.597 picograms/liter in the production well; this can also be
written as 203.597 x 10-15 grams/1. EPA Region 9 Preliminary Remediation Goals (PRGs)
indicates that the dioxins remediation goal is 4.5 x 10-7 grams/1, suggesting that dioxins leveis
within the well are safe. Ali of the other indicated sample results are non-detect for all
constituents. No problems conceming well water contamination are suspected from the supplied
analytical analysis.
.
RECOMMENDATIONS
In support of due diligence, PBS recommends that the onsite bunker fuel contaminated soil be
removed to the degree possible to not jeprodize adjacent building, slab or utility foundations.
Removing the contaminated soil will reduce potential future groundwater contamination by
ending the gravity transfer of bunker fuel from soil into the groundwater beneath. The
contaminated soil should be disposed at an offsite landfill. Clean fill soil can be brought in to
replace the contaminated soil. Work to remove the contaminated soil is currently underway
through a separate environmental project with Welchs Foods.
In accordance with WDOE - MTCA regulations in Chapter 173-340 WAC, PBS recommends
that the release be reported to the WDOE (this action has already been completed). In conjunction
with the contact with WDOE, PBS recommends that Welchs consider joining the WDOE
Voluntary Cleanup Program (VCP). Joining the VCP will involve submitting this report (anda
planned future excavation remedi.l action report) and receiving a decision from WDOE
conceming whether cleanup action, risk assessment, installing monitoring wells/monitoring or
further assessment is necessary at the Welchs site.
Further inspection of fluorescent light ballasts for PCBs and other potential hazardous bui1ding
materiais (lead and asbestos) should be completed prior to future onsite renovations.
LIMITATIONS
This work was performed in accordance with generally accepted practices of other consultants
undertaking similar studies during the same time period and geographical area. PBS
Environmental observed the same degree of care and skill generally exercised. by other
consultants under similar circumstances and conditions. The findings and conclusions of this
Lieb Foods, Inc.

August 16, 2006
Page 5
report are not scientific certainties, but rather, are based on professional judgement conceming
the significance of data gathered during the course of this assessment. The recommendations of
this report, or lack thereof, are not considered a legal opinion as to the clients duty conceming
to potentialliabilities
in leasing, owning, or purchasing real estate .
due diligence relating
. --------
PBS in no~ able to represent that the site or adjoining land contains no hazardous waste, oil or
other latent conditions beyond that detected or observed by PBS during this study. The
possibility always exists for contaminants to migrate through surface water, air, or groundwater.
The ability to accurately address the environmental risk associated with transport in these media
is beyond the scope of this investigation.
Attachments:
Figure 1
BoringLogs
Analytical Results
TANK ROOM 2
(UNCONCENTRA TED
STORAGE)
-ATER
UST
11 ,----,
LOADING
. OCK-
TANK
ROOM 1
~--- I
I
I I
r--- 1 I
STE
li1
05
L ____
FREEZERS
I
I
I
..,..
I L __ J
,-----~
~--'------~
!i
! -.
i
8-5~
COVERED
WALK
r-~~~~L
[QJ
ELEVATOR
,---
ISTORAGE
1
OVER
NIGHT
COMPRESSOR ROOM
TUNNEL
[QJ
B-6 ~
I
I
__ _
MACHINE
SHOP
.
L----
r--Y
I
I
I
I
_ _ _ _ _ _ __[ _ _ .J
..........
- - UNDERGROUND FUEL LINE
!
g
EXISTING MONITORING WELL
~
'
g
,.
o'
50'
200'
100'
SCALE: 1" = 100
Prepared for: BANK OF TIIE WEST
"'
Project.:ft:
SITE VICINITY PLAN
! PBS
Date:
AUGUST2006
10 EAST BRUNEAU STREET

FIGURE
Bore Hole/Well Cc:n'1struction_ Log
320 N. JDHNSON ST.

SUilE 700
KENNEWICK. WA. 9 9 3 3 6 ; f - - - - - - - - - - - : _ _ _ - - - - - , - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - , - - - - - - - - - J
PBS
(509) 735-2698
Project Nome:
Pro ject Loca tion:
Driller /Equipment:
Geologist/Engin eer:
Sample Method:
--
1 of 1
TOC Elevation (feet above datum):

Surface Elevation ( feet above datur;y:-====Start/End Date:
7/31/06
Hole Depth:
26.5'
6"
WELCHS
KENN[WICK, WASHINGTON
ENWRONMENTAL WEST
PAUL DAN/[LSON
A/R ROTARY/SPLIT-SPOON
---sample Data
Sheet
Boring/Well Number:
SB-1
Pro ject Number:

61396.00
FAX
(509) 735-1867
...
..
..
We/1
Construction
Detai/s
~]
Q.._
E'"
o~
VJ.E
tn
:g'E
QDQ.
iL~8
Sample
Number
.!,!
Soi/ Descript/on
tnc:
-2E
"'
;,:
o "
..C:-
o
i
:58
0.0-7': Firm, brown, sandy SILT; moist,slightly plastic.
2_
f-2
4_
f-4
fi_
p"" -:.)._;-~
'-8
0.90=o
- -8_
f-10
P~JR;
10_
7-14': Very dense, gray, sandy GRAVEL; moist, non-plastic,

__ .....Q; subrounded.
..
..
12_
f- 12
..
_ _ 14;__
f-14
14-21': Dense, brown fme to medium grained SAND; moist,

non-plastic.
29
SB1
23
16-17.5
30
f-16
1-18
..
16_
18_
..
20_
1--20
.Y.
r--24
1--26
13
SB1
71-22.5 40
42
SB1
174-25.5
-- -- --- -- -- ---- - - -- -- -
.o o
0-
oo
21~26.5':
Very dense, gray, fine to coarse grained GRAVEL; moist;

subrounded.
22 _
24_
Collected water sample.

26_
BOTTOM OF ROLE
28 _
_ 30
30_
~ 1--32
32_
34_
i
I
36_
38_
f-.38
gi-_4~0~-------------L---L----L------L---L------~-----------------------------------------~4~0~
LOCA T/ON: J7' N. and 19' [. FROM SOUTHWEST CORNER OF S/T[
.11.
NOTES
"'
1. SOIL INTERFACES ANO DESCRIPllDNS ARE INTERPREllVE ANO

ACTUAL CHANGES ANO TRANS\llDNS MAY BE GRADUAL.
2. WATER LEVEL IS FOR DATE SHOWN ANO MAY VARY WITH TIME
OF YEAR.
3. SOIL DESCRIPTIONS NDT INTENDED TO BE

USED FOR GEDTECHNICAL DESIGN
PURPOSES.
SB-1
!~~~...........................................................................................................
320 N. JOHNSON ST.

SUITE 700
KENNE\\ICK, WA. 9 9 3 3 6 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - , - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - r - - - - - - - - . . . J
PBS
(509) 735-2696
Project Nome:
Pro ject Locotion:
Driller /Equipment:
Geologist/Engineer:
Sample Method:
Sheet
Boring/Well Number:
SB-2
Project Number:
fAX
(509) .735-1667
61396.00
1 of 1
TOC Elevotion (feet obove dotum): _____ _

Surfoce Elevotion ( feet obove dotum): ____ _
Stort/End Dote:
7/31/06
Hole Depth:
24'
Outer Hole Oiometer:
6"
WELCHS
ENVIRONMENTAL WEST
PAUL OANIELSON
SampleData ---
Well
Constructlon
Detalls
.,-g
O. L
tn
~E'
E" ao o.
o~
VJ.!;
n:~8
Sample
Number
~
;t
~
lll
-~
Soll Descriptlon
"'c:
~E
22
58
o
0.0-5.0': Firm brown, sandy SILT w/ minor gravel; moist,

slightly plastic.
1-
f-2
2_
f-4-
1-6
1-8
10_
'---- 10
12_
1-12
--
1--14-
--
--
--
--
---
---
---
- - - 11...._
14-21': Dense, gray-brown, fme to medium grained SAND w/ gravel;

moist, non-plastic, subrounded.
16_
f-16
18_
f- 18
SB2
9-20.5
SB2
1--22
/0.5-22
,_.24
20_
-------------------
21-24': Dense, gray-brown, sandy fine to coarse grained GRAVEL; 22

satruated, subrounded. .
Collected water sarnple.
24
BOTTOM OF ROLE
26 _
28
28_
' - 30
30_
32_
34-_
~ 1-- J4
ig
I
36_
38_
1-38
~g I--4~0~-----~---L--L---L----L--L---J_________________________________________~4~0~~
f
.
"
LOCA T/ON: 54' E. ond 34' N. FROM SOUTHWEST CORNER OF S/ TE

NOTES
1. SOIL INTERfACES ANO OESCRIP110NS ARE INTERPRE11VE ANO
ACTUAL CHANGES ANO TRAN511lONS MAY BE GRADUAL.
2. WATER LEVEL IS fOR DATE SHOWN ANO MAY VARY \IlTH TIME
Of YEAR.
3. SOIL OESCRIP110NS NOT INTENOED TO BE

USEO fOR GEOTECHNICAL OESIGN
PURPOSES.
SB-2
~ ~
~~----------------------------------------------------J
Bore Hole/Well CorLstruction Log
320 N. JOHNSON ST.

SUITE 700
KENNEv.lCK, WA. 9 9 3 3 6 > 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - , - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . - - - - - - - - - - 1
PBS
{509) 735-2698
Project Nome:
Project Location:
Driller /Equipmen t:
Geologist/Engineer:
Sample Method:
Sheet
Boring/Well Number:
SB-3
Project Number:
61396.00
FAX
{509) 735-1867
LOW /NCOME HOUSING AUTHORITY

ENVIRONMENTAL WEST
PAUL OANIELSON
1 of 1
TOC Elevation (feet above datum): _____ _

Surfoce Elevation ( feet obove datum ): ____ _
Stort/End Date:
7/31/06
Hole Depth:
24'
Ou ter Hole Diameter:
6"
-sample Data
We/1
Construction
Detoils
"' ..-...
.s
"o E
E"' ao a.
~]
n.._
o~
Vl-E:
CL~8
Sompie
Number
~
"'
3:
..e
lll
.!!
"'c:
Soil Descrip tion
-~
..C:-
:58
0.0-4': Firm, brown, silty fine grained SAND w/ minar gravel; moist,
non-plastic.
.
2 -
1-2
--
1-4
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
- - 4_
4-14': Dense, gray, sandy GRAVEL; moist, non-plastic,

subrounded.
1-6
6 _
8 _
_8
10
10_
1- 12
12-
--
1-14
1-16
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
_ _ 14;_
14-19': Dense, brown, fine to medium grained SAND w/minor gravel;

moist, non-plastic.
15,
583
15-16
18_
18
----------------
_ 20
19-24': Very dense, gray, fine to coarse grained GRAVEL; moist,

non-plastic, subrounded.
20 _
_22
22_
1---24
24
BOTTOM OF ROLE
26_
28_
1---28
30_
32_
~ 1-32
~I
34_
:ll 1-34
1-
f-- JB
i!f
-~
36_
J6
38_
40
40
LOCA T/ON: 22' N. and 87' E. FROM SOUTHWEST CORNER OF S/ TE
NOTES
"'
1. SOIL INTERFACES ANO OESCRIPllONS ARE INTERPREllVE ANO

ACTUAL CHANGES ANO TRANSI110NS MAY BE GRADUAL.
2. WATER LEVEL IS FOR DATE SHOv.t-1 ANO MAY VARY v.lTH TIME
DF YEAR.
3. SOIL DESCRIP110NS NOT INTENDED TO SE

USED FOR GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN
PURPOSES.
SB-3
~ ~
~~----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------J
B ore Hole/V'Vell Constructic>n._ Lo g
320 N. JDHNSON ST.

SUITE 700
KENNEI'.ICK, WA. 9 9 3 3 i 6 f - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - , - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - , - - - - - - - - - - l
PBS
(509} 735-2698
Pro jec't Nam e:

Project Location:
Driller /Equipment:
Geologist/Engineer:
Sample Method:
Vi'
~
Cil
:E~
o_Q)
"~
a'-'
Well
Details
~~
Sheet
1 of 1

Surface Elevation ( feet above datum ): ____ _
Start/End Date:
7/31/06
Hole Depth:
24'
6"
WELCHS
ENVIRONMENTAL WEST
PAUL OANIELSON
-
Construction
Boring/Well Number:
SB-4
Project Number:
61396.00
FAX
(509) 735-1867
sample Data-
"'
=ij'E
E
t ao o..
o~
!1).!;: ([~8
Sample
Number
~.,
3o
o
iii
-I
,!,!
O> c
Soil Descrlp tlon
-2E
o;:,
.c-
58
0.0-6': Medium dense, brown, silty fine grained SAND w/ fine gravel;
moist, non-plastic.
2 _
1--2
4_
1--4
--
1--6
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
- - 6_
6-15': Dense, gray-brown, sandy GRAVEL; moist, non-plastic,

subrounded.
._a
B _
._w
10_
1-- 12
12_
1-- 14
14_
15-18': Dense, brown, fme to medium grained SAND; moist,

non-plastic. -
r- 16
- -16_
____ 18_
r- 18
584
1-20
19-20. .':
18-24': Very dense, brown-gray, sandy GRAVEL; moist,

subrounded.
20_
22_
r-22
24
1--24
BOTTOM OF HOLE
1--26
26_
1--28
28_
r-30
30_
l'iz r-32
32_
~111- 1--34
J4_
iij
~
i1l
1--36
36_
~ 1--38
J8_
:;l
J--4~0~---------------J---L-----L-------L---L------L--------------------------------------------------4~0~~
LOCA TION: 14' N. and 115' E. FROM SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SITE
_11_
NOTES
"'
1. SOIL INTERFACES ANO DESCRIPTlDNS ARE INTERPRETlVE ANO

ACTUAL CHANGES ANO TRANSITlONS MAY BE GRADUAL
>
~ ~
2. WATER LEVEL IS FOR DATE SHDWN ANO MAY VARY I'.ITH TIME
DF YEAR.
3. SDIL OESCRIPTlONS NOT INTENOED TO BE

USEO FOR GEDTECHNICAL OESIGN
PURPDSES.
SB-4
~~----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------J
320 N. JOHNSON ST.

SUITE 700
KENNEWICK. WA. 9 9 3 3 6 ! - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . , - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . . , - - - - - - - - - , - - - - - l
PBS
(509) 735-2698
Project Nome:
Project Location:
Drller /Equipment:
Geologst/Engneer:
Sample Method:
Sheet
1 of 1
Boring/Well Number:
SB-5
Project 1\lumber:
61396.00
FAX
(509) 735-1867

Surface Elevaton ( feet above datum): ____ _
Start/End Date:
8/1/06
Hale Depth:
24'
6"
WELCHS
[N VIRONMEN TAL WfST
. PAUL OANIELSON
AIR ROTARY/SPLIT-SPOON
sample Data
Well
Construction
Details
"'
:ijE
0
o.
E:~~
Soil Description
Sample
Number
0.0-0.2': Asphalt.
0.2-7': Dense, gray, sandy GRA VEL; slightly moist, non-plastic.
1-2
4_
1-4
6_
1-6
-.-
-- - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -
7-14': Dense, gray-brown, fine to coarse grained SAND w/gravel;

moist, non-plastic.
i-8
l-lO
10_
1- 12
12-
1-14
--
--
--
--
---
--
--
--
14-18': Dense, gray, sandy fine to medium GRAVEL; moist,

non-plastic.
1-16
1-18
1---
SB5
72
9-20.5'1-10(
1-20
SB5
33
170.5-22 44
42
o
0
0o"a
0o 0
o0
o
--
-- --
--
--
--
--
18-24': Very dense, gray, medium to coarse grained GRAVEL;

moist, non-plastic.
16_
...llL
c
20_

22_
1--24
--
- - 14__
24
BOTTOM OF ROLE
26_
28_
JO_
_J2
J2_
~ r-34
J4_
13
IP
i
I
JB_
1-JB
ii-_4~0~---------J--L---L----L--L----L---------------------------~40~~
~
.ll.
~
~
,c
"' :>
$ ~
LOCA TION: 80' N. and 153' [. FROM SOUTHWEST CORNER OF S/TE

NOTES
1. SOIL INTERFACES ANO DESCRIPTlDNS ARE INTERPRETJVE ANO
ACTUAL CHANCES ANO TRANSITlDNS t.IAY BE GRADUAL
2. WATER LEVEL IS fOR DATE SHOWN ANO t.IAY VARY WITH TIME
OF YEAR.
3. SOIL DESCRIPTJONS NOT INTENDED TO SE

USED FOR GEOlECHNICAL DESIGN
PURPOSES.
SB-5
~~--........................................................................................................J
B ore Hole/Well CorLstru.ctioil Log
32o N. JoHNsoN sT.
KENNE~Ud~~ ~~O 9 9 3 3 , 6 } - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - , - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - , - - - - - - - - - l
(509) 735-2698
Sheet
1 of 1
Boring/WeJJ Number:
SB-6
Pro ject Number:
FAX
(509) 735-1867
61396.00
TOC EJevation ( feet above datum ): _____ _

WELCHS
Project Nome:
Surface Elevation ( feet above datum): ____ _
Pro ject Location:
Start/End Date:
8/1/06
ENVIRONMENTAL WEST
DriJJer /Equipment:
HoJe Oepth:
20.5'
PAUL DANIELSON
GeoJogist/Engineer:
Ou ter HoJe Diameter:
6"
AIR ROTARY/SPLIT-SPOON
SampJe Method:
-1---,-------,..--.,.---,-,----,-----------,----------------------------l
- - samp/e Data
We/1
Construction
Detal/s
--
o.
-.~
~E'
Et
0 ..... coa.
(/).f;
:~8
Samp/e
Number
~
;,
"'
o
rn
.!!
Soi/ Description
O. c
~E
o "
-C:-
58
0.0-0.2': Asphalt.
0.2-6': Dense, brown, fine to medium grained SAND wl some
fine grave!; moist, non-plastic.
1-2
2_
-
4_
1-4
--
1-6
--
--
-- --
--
--
--
- - 6_
6- 1>': Dense, gray-brown, sandy fine to medi um grained GRAVEL;

moist, non-plastic.
1-8
8 _
10_
1--10
1--12
1--14
12_
S86
11-15
1-
----
-- -- - -
---- ----
-- -- - - -
13-15': Medium dense, brown, silty SAND w/ fine gravei;

moist, non-plastic.
----
-- - - - - --
----
--
15-20.5': Very dense, gray,sandy GRAVEL; moist,

nonplastic.
1-16
y
1-78
14_
-- - - 16_
18_
BOTTOM OF BOLE
22__
_20
!'---'
_22
1-24
24_
1-26
26_
1-28
28_
1-30
30_
r; 1-32
32_
1-34
34_
1-36
36_
~ 1-38
38_
i
g
~g
1--4~0~----------------~---L-----L----~_L___L______J _________________________________________________--~4~0~
~
-~
~
"'
~ ~
LOCATION: OO' N. and 600' E. FROM SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SITE

NOTES
I. SOIL INTERFACES ANO OESCRIPTlDNS ARE INTERPRETlVE ANO
ACTlJAL CHANGES ANO TRANSITlONS MAY BE GRADUAL.
2. WATER LEVEL IS FOR DATE SHDWN ANO MAY VARY WITH TIME
DF YEAR.
.
3. SOIL OESCRIPTlONS NOT INTENOEO TO BE

USEO FOR GEOTECHNICAL OESIGN
PURPOSES.
SB-6
~~----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------'
Bore Hole/VVell Construction. Log
320 N. JOHNSON ST.

SU\TE 700
KENNEWICK. WA. 99336;f-~~~~---~-~-.-~~--.,--~~~~~~~~---~~~-,~~-----~-J
PBS
(509) 735-2598
Project Nome:
Pro ject Location:
Driller /Equipment:
Geologist/Engineer:
Sample Method:
Boring/Well Number:
SB-7
Pro ject Number:
FAX
(509) 735-1857
61396.00
Sheet
1 of 1

Surfoce Elevation (feet above datum): ____ _
Start/End Date:
8/1/06
Hole Depth:
24'
6"
WELCHS
KENN[W/CK, WASHINGTON
ENV/RONMENTAL WEST
PAUL DAN/ELSON
- Sample-Data --
Wefl
Constructlon
Details
.,
,gE
0
n_
: ~.,e;
Soil Descrip tlon

Sample
Number.
:P
. :Q:_
:09:-0?
1--2
::.o:~~-:a
0.0-0.2': Asphalt.
--
1-4
li
1--6
1--8
1-- 70
2_
0.2-4': Dense, gray, sandy GRAVEL; slightly moist,

non-plastic.
----
--
--
----
--
--
----
---- 4_
4-17': Dense, gray, medium to coarse grained SAND w/ gravei;

moist, non-plastic.
6 _
8_
10_
12_
1--14
14_
S87
14-15
16_
1-16
... .. .
-------------------
17-24': Very dense, gray, medi um to coarse grained GRAVEL

w/ sand; saturated, nonplastic.
78 _
20_
I- 20
Collected water sample. Small amount of oil on top

ofwater.
S87
170.5-22
22_
24
1-24
BOTTOM OF ROLE
26_
28_
30_
32_
~ I-J2
.
~
34_
~-~J4
~
i1l
36_
i
'f
-~
38_
1--38
~~-~4~0~-----------------L-_L~_ _L____
~
_L_
_L_ _ _ _ _
-~
$-
NOTES
"'
1. SOIL INTERFACES ANO DESCRIPTIONS ARE INTERPRETIVE ANO
J_~------------------------------------------------~4~0~
LOCAT/ON: 30' S. and 145' E. FROM SOUTHWEST CORNER OF S/T[
ACTUAL CHANGES ANO TRANSITIONS MAY BE GRADUAL
>
~ ~
2. WATER LEVEL IS FOR DATE SHOWN ANO MAY VARY WITH TIME
3. SOIL DESCRIPTIONS NOT INTENDED 10 BE

USED FOR GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN
PURPOSES.
SB-7
OF YEAR.
~~--------------------------------------------------~
PORTLAND
SEATTLE
PBS
VANCOUVER
EUGENE
BEND
August 24, 2006
TRI-CITIES
Mr. Marty Gardner

Welch's Foods
1OEast Bruneau
Re:
SOIL REMEDIAL ACTION REPORT AT THE LOCATION OF FORMER

UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS (USTS), 10 EAST BRUNEAU,
PBS PROJECT NUMBER #61405.00
Dear Mr. Gardner:

In August 2006, at your request PBS Engineering and Environmental (PBS) and Welch's Foods
(Welch's) began a soil based remedial action for the remova! ofbunker fuel contaminated soil at
the Welch's pro:perty. This report provides a summary o f the remedial action results.
BACKGROUND
Food processing has occurred at the Welch's plantlocation since approximately 1925. PBS
completed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Phase I) in July 2006, followed by a Phase
I1 Environmental Assessment (Phase Il) on the property in August 2006. Bunker fuel
contamination was detected in groundwater during the Phase Il in borings #4 and #7. Further
study of the results, plans and early photographs of the site indicated that two- 12,000 gallon
USTs containing bunker fuel were removed from the site in the late 1980s. The location of the
earlier USTs were 120 feet east of the southwest comer of the subject property, with the pump
unit on the south side of the two north oriented USTs (see Figure 1). A 50,000 gallon UST
provides backup fuel at this time. This report summarizes excavation based remedial action and
soil disposal associated with the project and the former USTs .
. FIELD METHODS/ACTIVITIES
The fieldwork for this project was conducted from August 1O. through 17, 2006; with a utility
locate completed on the property prior to beginning work. K. Kaser Company completed the
excavation and contarninated soil removal with a Case 9030 B Trackhoe. The original intent was
to locate contamination along an exisfingset offuellines fromthe Welch's Boiler Building to the
existing 50,000-gallon UST. As excavation proceeded along the lines in the vicinity of
contaminated Boring #4, it was concluded that no leakage had occurred from that system. A
plans search indicated that the two 12,000 gallon USTs had previously been located immediately
to the south of Boring #4, so excavation at the former location of the USTs for the earlier system
was initiated. The excavator first encountered contamination at approximately 14 feet below
ground surface, with contamination continuing down to groundwater at 21 feet below ground
surface.
ENGINEERING ANO ENVIRONMENTAL
320 N. Johnson SL
Suite 700
Kennewick, WA 99336
509.735.2698 PHONE
509.735.1867 FAX
www.pbsenv.com
Welch's Foods, Inc.

August 24, 2006
Page2
The project continued by excavating into and progressively removing the contamination.
Contaminated soil was removed by the excavator and placed into a dump truck for removal from
the immediate area and temporary storage in the northeast quadrant of the Welch's site (see
Figure 2). _Because of lack of room in the excavation area clean soil was also removed and
separately stacked in the northeast comer of the Welch's facility. The temporary soil storage
areas were asphalt covered, with a catch basin in that area temporarily plugged to disallow
contaminant discharge from the site if rain occurred.
Soil remediation was the main target of this project, with all of the contaminated soil from above
the water table removed. Contaminated soil from below the water table was left, due to the
ineffectiveness of attempts to remediate that soil and groundwater by excavation. As excav'ation
proceeded, a gas line and then the main oillines between the boiler and 50,000 gallon UST were
cut and removed to make room to the northwest for excavation to proceed.
When all contamination above the water table was removed, soil samples from the lower portion
of the excavation sidewalls, ciean soil stockpile and contaminated soii stockpile were collected
into 4-ounce giassjars (see Figures 1 & 2 for the sample Iocations). Ali samples were shipped in
iced coolers to a certified environmentai Iaboratory, within the required holding time of the
reievant anaiytical method .
.Mixed sand and gravei, with rnany pieces of brick, pipe, rebar and other former construction
components were excavated from the former tank basin. Much of the material excavated from
the upper 12 feet of the former UST area was fill :from within the pyevious tank basin. Within the
excavation, gravei with sand was observed to 1O feet below ground surface, with sand beneath to
18 feet below ground surface. Beneath the sand was sandy gravei down into the water table.
Groundwater was encountered in the excavation at 21 feet below ground surface.
Backfill of the remedial excavation zone with clean back:fill is underway concurrent with the
completion of this report. The clean soil excavated from the bole, as well as clean offsite backfill
are being used to complete the backfill.
LABORATORY RESULTS ..
Ali sampies were submitted to Friedman and Bruya Laboratory in Seattle, Washington for
analysis by total petroleum hydrocarbons - diesel extended (NWTPH-Dx) a method that
quantifies heavy hydrocarbon oil components. To make the quantifications necessary for
contaminated soil disposal at Allied Waste (Rabanco) other anaiysis was completed including:
total metais for lead (Pb), cadrnium (Cd) and chromium (Cr), benzene, ethylbenzene, toiuene and
xyienes (BTEX) and total organic halogens (TOX). Table 1 provides a summary of analytical
results. The analyses indicate that fuei contarnination was present in the contalninated stockpile,
with minirnal contarninant impact indicated in the clean stockpile and the final excavation
sidewalls. Final analytical results for the clean soil transferred onto the property from offsite have
not yet been completed, with that data to be provided in an addendum letter to follow. The
laboratory report is attached following this report.
Welch's Foods, Inc.

August 24, 2006
Page 3
TABLEl
ANALYTICALRESULTS
Sample
Nnmber
61405.00-1
61405.00-2
61405.00-3
61405.00-4
61405.00-5
61405.00-6
61405.00-7
61405.00-8
61405.00-9
61405.00-10
61405.00-11
61405.00-12
61405.00-13
61405.00-14
61405.00-15
61405.00-16
61405.00-17
61405.00-18
Soil Cleanup
Leveis
Sample Location
Excavation 33W/39S/-21'
Excavation 31 W/488/-20'
Contanrinated Stockpile
Contaminated Stoclcpile
Contaminated Stockpile
Clean Stockpile
Clean Stockpile
Clean Stockpile
Imported Clean Soil
Imported Clean Sai!
Imported Clean Soil
Diesel/OH
Resnlts
AllND
AllND
A!IND
AllND
AllND
62/ND
420/1100
8900/12000
NA
8300/11000
NA
1400/2400
55/ND
140/ND
AllND
InProgress
InProgress
In Progress
2000/2000
BTEX
Pb/Cd/Cr
TOX
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA'
NA
AllND
NA
ND/ND/ND/0.6
NA
ND/ND/ND/0.8
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.03/7/6/9
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
9.31/<1/2.58
NA
20.6/<113.33
NA
5.46/<1/2.6
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
25012119
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
<5
NA
<5
NA
<5
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NOTES:
Ali sample matrix materiais are soil.
WDOE - MTCA Method A Cleanup leveis for each constituent are indicated in the last line.
Bolded numbers indicate analysis exceeding cleanup leveis
A1l analytical results are in milligrarns/kilogram (mg/kg)
ND - Soil sampled and analyzed but constituent not detected.
NA- indicates not applicable or not analyzed.
Excavation sample locations (and depth) are measured (in feet) from the southeast comer ofthe Welch's
Office Building
See Figures 1 & 2 for further sample location information
CONCLUSIONS
Analytical results indicate that petroleum hydrocarbon impact above Washington State
Department of Ecology. (WDOE) Model Toxic Control Act (MTCA) Method A cleanup leveis
were found in soil :from the excavation (see analytical results for the contaminated stockpile,
which originated from contaminated soil in the excavation). Field indications of significant
bunker fuel contamination were observed within the excavation during remedial action.
Approximately 516 cubic yards of contaminated soil were removed from the excavation, with
approximately 348 cubic yards of clean soil separately stockpiled in the northeast portion of the
site.
Welch's Foods, Inc.

August 24, 2006
PBS Project#61405.00
Page 4
The origin of the fuel contamination was judged to be approximately below the south end of the
west former 12,000-gallon UST. Excavating and removing the contaminated soil above the water
table has reduced potential future groundwater contamination by ending the previously ongoing
gravitytransfer of oil from soil to groundwater.
Groundwater is contaminated due to the release of bunker fuel. From the previous Phase TI,
Boring #4 groundwater was most contaminated because it was located closest to the former USTs
(approximately at the north end of the tanks and downgradient). Boring #7 (10' - 15"
upgradient) indicated much less fuel contamination on groundwater. Downgradient flow of
contamination in groundwater did not transport contamination as far as Boring #5 (approximately
75' northeast ofthe former USTs).
Allied waste "Generator Waste Pro:file Sheets" have been prepared, with analytical results.
supplied to the Rabanco Landfill in Klickitat County, Washington (see attached). Removal and
offsite disposal of the contaminated soil is to be completed within approximately one-month. At
that time waste disposal receipts, a more accurate shipping weight and other not yet available
information will be supplied as an addendum to this report.
In accordance with WDOE- MTCA regulations in Chapter 173-340 WAC, the release associated
with this cleanup has been reported to the WDOE with a Facility Site ID Number (#89931898)
provided by the agency. In conjunction with the contact with WDOE, Welch's is in
commnication with WDOE for the purposes of joining the Voluntary Cleanup Program (VCP).
Joining the VCP will involve submitting this report (and the.recently completed Phase II report)
and receiYing a decision from WDOE conceming whether further groundwater cleanup action,
. risk assessment, installing monitoring wells (with monitoring) or further assessment is necessary
at the Welch's site.
RECOMMENDATIONS
PBS recommends that, in conjunction with the cleanup process and the VCP, Welch's should
consider requesting that WDOE p~ovide a No Further Action (NFA) letter regarding remediation
of the soil at the site. The WDOE will provide further recommendations conceming how to
proceed regarding the remaining onsite groundwater contamination, with further work including,
but not necessarily limited to, well installation and monit?ring expected.
LIMITATIONS
This work was performed in accordance with generally accepted practices of other consultants
undertaking similar studies during the same time period and geographical . area. PBS
Environmental observed the same degree of care and skill generally exercised by other
consultants under similar circumstances and conditions. The findings and conclusions of this
reportare not scientific certainties, but rather, are based on professional judgemeht conceming
the significance of data gathered during the course of this assessment. The reconimendations of
this report, or lack thereof, are not considered a legal opinion as to the clients duty conceming
due diligence relating to potentialliabilities in leasing, owning, or purchasing real estate.
Welch's Foods, Inc.

August 24, 2006
Page 5
PBS in not able to represent that the site or adjoining land contains no hazardous waste, oil or
other latent conditions beyond that detected or observed by PBS during this study. The
possibility always exists for contaminants to migrate through surface water, air, or groundwater.
The ability to accurately address the environmental risk associated with transport in these media
is beyond the.scope ofthis invstigatioii.
PBS very much appreciates the opportunity to provide this report. If you have any questions,
information please contact us at (509) 735-2698.
Paul Danielson, LHG

Proj ect Manager
Attachments:
Figure 1 & Figure 2

Pictures
Generator WasteProfile Sheets
Analytical Results
BOI LER
BUILDING
-~
--}
8-5
CONCRETE
SLAB
WELL
---/-.
I
--"j--
I
---~---
--f---
~--r--.-
---1---
---J.__
~SUMP
--1---
_f
~=OFFICE
GAS UNE
INFRiSTRUCTU2oR
I
PARKING
I -
8-2
1l/)
:::>
g
....J
<(
e,
o
o
o
o"
U')
8-1
LEGEND
::i
~
";
SOIL SAMPLE LOCATION ANO

NUM8ER
~ 1 - - - - (:.~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 8
80RING LOCATION WELL ANO

NUM8ER
i -
Prepared for: WELCHS FOODS
SCALE: 1"=20'
"
; ~~~n=6~~~~o~~~c.t;~~oJ~s~IT;E;V~I~C;INI;T;Y~AND;~E~X~C~A~V~A~T~IO~N~RE~ME~D~IAL~~A~C;TI;O~.N;;P~LAN;l--;;;FI~GURE~l
1
g p Bs
i'l
Date:
AUGUST2006
10 EAST BRUNEAU
KENNEWICK, WASHJNGTON
H~
)(
)(
)(
X~
)(
)(
)(
)(
1\:
NORTHEAST AREA OF WELCH'S FOODS

0
0
to
TEMPORARY CONTAMINA TED SOIL STOCKPILE

0
11
0
12
COVERED DRYWELL
-8
)
0
13
14
TEMPORARY CLEAN SOIL STOCKPILE

LOADING --oRYWELL
DOCK
(
0
15
'
1\-
1\
1\
\1
1\
"
LEGEND
0
SCALE: 1" = 20'
Prepared for: WELCHS FOODS
Project#:
PBS
61405.000
SITE VICINITY PLAN.
Date:
10 EAST BRUNEAU
AUGUST2006
SOIL SAMPLE LOCATION ANO

NUMBER
FIGURE
APPENDIX E
Site Health and Safety Plan
PBS
SITE HEALTH &
SAFETY PLAN
October 14, 2007

Purpose: To identify potentialwork-related hazards and required PPE, and to develop a basic plan-of
actionfor responding to injuries and ewrg(?-ncies. Jlf!here applicable, information contained here shall be
briefed verbally to PBS subcontractors prior to the start of work. A signature page is Jound on Page 3.
Prepared for:
Welch1s Foods
Grandview, Washington
Site Name and Address:
Welch1s Site, Kennewick
1OEast Bruneau
.Kennewick, WA
E M E R G. E N C Y
IN FORMAT I ON
PBS Project Manager Name:

Paul Danielson
PBS Office Address & Mobile Phone N umber:
(509) 727-0538
320 North J obnson # 100, Kennewick, W A,
.Alternate PBS Contact Name:

-~~ )t1111.:.
Alternate Mobile PhoneNumber: (509) 378v~l99
~ rk I
7L7-
a f; 7 J
1:1r .. 2 G9 ~
Ce:.e.Jl.
Nearest Hospital/Emergency Room and Phone: (driving directions attached)

Leave project site by turning left off of Bruneau Street onto Washington Street.
Drive
approximately 10 block south on Washington Street and tum right onto gth Avenue. Travel one
block west on gth Avenue and tum left ontoAuburn Street; Kennewick General Hospital is on your
right immediately as you enter Aubum Street. The Emergency Room entrance is available on the
right.
Ambulance/Fire/Police: 911
Nearest Phone: PBS Project Manager (mobile):
Nearest Water: On site-
(509) 727-0538
Important Emergency Phone Numbers
_i
WA Department ofEcology 24-hour Spill Response Hotline: .......................... (360) 407~6300

National Response Center: ............................................................................ :.... (800) 424-8802
NorthwestNatural Gas (Emergency): .................................................... (800) 882-3377
Other Natural Gas (hand-enter phone): ................................................ (888) 522-1130
Northwest UtilityNotification Center (Washington): ....................................... (800) 424-5555
Washington Poison Center; Emergency Phone: ................................................ (800) 222-1222
.
PBS Project #: 61499.00
Washington State Labor and Industry Safety & Health: ................................... (800) 423-723 3
PBS Project #: 61499~00
EMERGENCY
PLAN
First-aid kit location:

Project Man.ger's vehicle (verify present)
Cbemical exposure (accidental skin/eye contact): Identify chemical and flush with water if
appropriate; transpmi to hospital. See attached MSDS for further infonnation.

Ambulance: ........................................... -................................................................................ ,.......... 911
Fite: .................................................................................................................................................. 911
Police: ................................................................................................................................... ............ 911
Map and Directions to the nearest hospital: .............................................................. attached/last page

Designated Emergency Vehicle: Will call ambulance - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ign~tion key location (ifnot in vehicle): NA
NATURE OF SITE WORK
Three borings and monitoring wells will be completed on the subject property in an area of known
fuel contamination. Work areas marked and cleared from utilities prior to drilling.
KNOWN/SUSPECTED SITE HAZARDS
1+-;:ct , 'P"'t;e1i:t"i"t .ua:zitiil'"-)' <:n
_''X'' 1ndicates :knwit-'liiard ll. site:;
Heavy Equipment (drill rig)

Noise
Slippery Surfaces if wet
Site Construction traffic

Bunker Fuel Oil Contamination
P
i?
jol
PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQIDPMENT (PPE)

Minimum required PPE are noted below with an "X". No te: If reporting to a primary contractor, ensure
compliance with their minimum PPE requirements.
-;, ,~:: '~.-.,?:t~{g;;:;x.!f~,~\;.;::;,c~iR::PEti'f:Rl-:>;\'(~;;;~;,~-;~.:-,.;_;{\;_; ' ;;; :~~' 1X'i'i.ii'dicates'iirerris-re4uira :;_ ;

HardHat
R'Hearing Protection
Safety Glasses
Steel-Toe Boots
Safety/high-visibility vest
Rain Suit
Work loves (rubber when m
Other
r
01~
con_tactJ
PLAN ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This Plan was prepared and reviewed in general accordance with the PBS Corporate Health and
Safety Program and was written by Paul Danielson on October 14, 2007.
Thefollowing site personnel have been briefed on this Plan and understand its provisions:
d--;!U
PaulDanielson
-~~
'
...-
-~~-
/,:_'_---,_(_ ---/-:~
----
:.;~(
,._
.--i_ \.- .-. . ._
-. ~~-~ !-\rL .b ,.. (_
Date and time ofbrief:
f
/
kJ
__ _
i\.
J ,..
---, --:-r
"- . ). -~ /
~----
- (:
c'
--~--------~-----------------
'f-"''
--~
PBS Initials: --~~---------.!f '4. -
(
I
Directions and Map to N earest Medicai Facility

Uo::~rrP
.c;, nf
.c;
,,
HMIS BHCPZ :RESIDUAL FUEL OIL,BUNKER FUEL OIL
Page 1 of6
/MSDS/HMIS/151/BHCPZ.HTM (6 hits.).
Get tihe mos.t: cotnprehens.ive

M'SDS'/HazCorn program on tbe 1m.arket!'
RESIDUAL FUEL OIL,BUNKER FUEL
oa
Physical and Chemical Properties

Stability and Reactivily
Toxicological Infonnation
Product and Comnany Identiiication

ComP-osition!Infonnation on Ingredi ents
Hazards Identification
.. First Aid Measures
Fire Fighting Measures
Accidental Release Measures
Handling and Stora~
Exposure ControlsiPersonal Prcitection
Ecological Infonnation
.:lliposal. Considerations
Trans,P-ort Information
Regulatory Jnformation
Other Infonnation I Ha.zmat Info I Hazcom
Label
!! This is an.ARCHIVE Record !!

MSDS Safety Informa tion
~SC:
MSDS Date: 10/07/1985
9140
Subntter: B DT
LIIN: OOB020062
MSDS Num: BHCPZ
Tecll Review: 04/1411989
Status CD: C
Product RESIDUAL FUEL OIL,BUNKER FUEL OiL
MFN:"Ol .
ID:
KitN
:Part:
Article: N
Re.sponsiblc Party
Cage: 00033
Namc: BELCHER COMPANY

Address: 9 GREENWAY PLAZA
State: TX
Cjty: HOUSTON
Box: N/K
Zip: 770.46
Country: US
.
.
.
Info PhoneNumber: 713-877-1400
Emllrgcncy. Phmc Number: 713-877-1400

Preparer'sName: DELNO MALZAHN,Clli
Proprietary Ind: N
Rcyicw lnd:Y
. ...
.........
--------------
. --'"-- nM-,..,/At~P!=!rr.h/ltisapi6.dil?cmd=getdoc&Docld=209204&...
9/1112007
I:IMIS BHCPZ : RESIDUAL FUEL OIL,BUNKER FUEL OIL
Page 2 of6
Spccial Proj ect CD: N
l'ub1ished:Y
Contrl'tctor Summar'Y
Cage:00033
Namc:BELCHER CM:PANY
Addres~:9
GREENWAY PLAZA
City:HOUSTON
Box:N/K
Zip:77046
State;TX
. Conntry:US
:Phone:713-877-1400
Ingl'edieuts
TOP
Code:M
Cas:. 68553-00-4
RTECS#: 1004181CM Code:M
Name: COMJ.>LEX Iv.liXTURE F P.ARAFFINIC,OLEFINIC,NAPHTHENIC AND

AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS
% Text:.99
Environinental Wt:
other REC Limits: N/K
OSHA.l'EL: 5 AS
OIL MIST
OSJIA
STEL:
Code:M
ACGillTLV:5
ACGffiN/P
Code:M
ST.EL:
EPARptQty:
DOTR]It
Qty:
Ozone Depleting Chemical: N

Health .Hazards Data
LDSO LCSO MixtureN/K

Route OfEntry Inds- Inhalation:YES
Carcinogenicity tn- NTP:NO
Skin:YES
IARC:NO
Ingestion:YES
OSHA:NO
lfealth llazards Acute And Chronic .

PROLONGED AND REPEATED SKIN CONTACT MAY CAUSE DERMATITIS:
Explanation Of Carcinogcnicity
NIK
.
Signs And Symptious O f Ovcrexposure
MODERATELY D.UUTATING TO SKIN. CAUSES REDNESS ANl DRYING OF SK.W.
IRRITATING TO MUCOUS MEMBRANES AND RESPIRATORY TRACT.WILL PRODUCE
SYMPTOMS OF INTOXICTJON. CAN ACT AS A SJMPLE ASPHY.XIANT. INGESTIONMAY CAUSE MILD EXCITATION,LOSS OF CONSCI .
.
OUSNESS,CONVOLIONS,CYANQSIS,CONGESTION AND CAPILLARY REMORRHAGING
OF LUNGS/ORGA
.
Medi cal Cond Aggravated By Exposure

...
--- ---~~"'"PntP.r
~-
. . --- - .------------ ---- ------

---..-----
r.om/dtSearch/dtisapi6:dll?cmd=getdoc&Docld=209204&... 9!11/2007
- - - - - - - - . - .... -
H.l\1JS BHGPZ : RESIDUAL FUEL OIL,BUNKER FUEL OIL
P~ge
3 of6
MAY AGGRAVATEPRE-EXISTJNG DERMATITIS.

FiJst Aid Information
FLUSR EYES WIT.H WATER FOR 15 MIN. GET MEDICAL ATIENTION. FOR
SKIN,RTIMOVE CONTAMINATED CLOTHING,WASH WITII SOAP & WATEJi. IF
INHALED,MOVE TO FRESH AIR. APPLYARTIFICIAL RESPillATION IF NOT BREATHJNG.
GET :MEDICAL ATIENTION.lF INGESTED,DO NOT IN DUCE VOMIT.ING IF
SPONTANEOUS VOMITING OCCURS,HOLD VICTIM'S BEAD LOWER TiiAN IIIPS TO.
PREVENT ASPm.ATION.
SpiU Release Procedurcs
REMOVE SOURCES OF HEAT OR IGNITION,JNCLUDING INTERNAL COMTitJSTION

ENGINBS AND ROWER TOOLS. CLEAN-UP SPJLL BUT DO NOT FLUSHTO SEWER OR
SURFACES WATER. VENTILATE AREA AND AVOID BREATIDNG VAPORS. OR MISTS.
N eutralizing Agent .
NIK
.. TOP.
Wnste Disposal Methods

DISPOSE THROUGHALICENSED WASTE DISpOSAL COMPANY.FOLLOW
FEDERAL,STA1E AND LOCAl RllGULATIONS.
H:mdliug aud Stmage Precautions
STOREINTIGH~Y CLOSED CONTAINERS.JN A COOL,DRYPLACE,AWAYFROM SOURCES OF HEAT OR

IGNIT10N.GROUND AND BOND AIL TRANSFER & STORAGE EQUIP WITI-:I SELF CL
Othcr Prec:a.ution~
CONTACT BELCHER COMP ANY FOR FURTRER INFORMATION..
Firc and Explosion Ha:z2rd Information
Flash Point Method: PMCC
Flash Point:
Flash Point Text:>I40
Autoignition Temp Tcxt: N/A
Autoignition Tcmp:
Lower Limits: 3.9
Upp_er Limits: 20.1

Extinguishing Media
DRY CHEMICAL,FOAM,CARBON DIOXIDE,WATER SPRAY.

Fire Fighting Procedures
FIREFIGHTERS SROULD WEAR SELF-CONTA1NED BREA1HING A.PPARAWS. DO NOT USE A
FORCE STREAM OF WATER DIRBCTLY ON OIL FlllES AS TIITS WILL SCATTER THE FlRE.
Unusual:J!ire/Exploson Hazard
CAN BE IGNITED BY SELF-GENERATED STATIC ELECTRICITY;CONTAlNERS SHOULD BE

.
'~._ ____ ,
";..
...... - .... --
-- .. - - ------------:-------- .--------
.""..-"'""nri'.P.r.enter.coro/dtSearch/dtisapi6.dll ?cmd=getdoc&Docid=209204&;..
9/11/2007
-----------
HMIS BHCPZ :RESIDUAL FUEL DIL,BUNICER FUEL OIL
Page 4 of6
BONDED AND GROUNDED.

Control Measmes
.
Respiratory Protection
USE AJlPROVED RESPill..ATORY PROTECTNE EQUIPMENTFOR CLEANJNG LARGE

SI?ILLS OR ENTRY INTO LARGB TANKS,VESSELS OR OTHER CONFINBD SPACES.
Ventilation
PROV.IJ)E ADEQUATE VENTILATION TO ICEEP MIST OR VAPORS BELOW

ALLOWABLE EJ(POSURE LEVEL$.
:Protective Gloves
IlviPERVIOUS.
Eye Pr.otection
CHEMlCAL GLASSBS OR GGGLES.

Ofher Protective
.
. Equipment
NIK
WorkHygienic Practices
NIK
Supplemental Safety nd Health
NIK
Pllysical/Chemical Properties
HCC:
Net Prop WT For Ammo:

Boiling :Point~
Melt/Freeze Pt:
Decomp Temp: .
Vapor Pres: 0.2 @20C
Volatlle Org Content %:
VOC Pounds/G:!llon:
VOC Grams!Liter:
NRC/State LIC No:
B.P.. Text: 500F

M.P/F.P Te:rt: ~20F
Decomp Text: N/K.
Vapor Dcnsity: N/K..
Spec Gra"Vity: 0.97
PH:N/K.
Viscoslty NIP
. Evaporation Ratc &<0.01 ETHYL ETHER=l .

Rcfcrence:
Solubility in Watcr: lNSOLUBLE
Appcarance and C>dor: MILD PETROLEUM ODOR,BLACK LIQUID TO HEAVY
SPRAY.
Percent Volatilesby Volume: 100
Corro si on R ate: N/K
. .
.. ~~ ..
----- ------------ --------
,__._._ ''""'"'; oPtf\nn~sourcecenter. com/dtS earch/dt~sapi6.dll?cmd=getdoc&Docld=209204&. ..
9/11/2007
Page 5 of6
HMIS BHCPZ :RESIDUAL FUEL OIL,BUNKER FUEL OIL
dtSearh 7.20 (71 04)

Renctivty Dntll
Stability lndicator: \r:ES
-Stability Condition To _.4_void: AVOID HEAT,SP ARK,FLAME,BUTI,D-UP OF
-STATIC_ELECTRICITY.
Materiais To Avoid: STRONG OXID_IZING AGENTS.
Hazardous Decomposition CARBON MONOXIDB,GA1U30N DIOXIDE AND
Products: HYDROCARBONS AND SULFUR DIOXIDE.
Hazardous Polymcrization NO
Indicator: .
Conditions To Avoid N/K.
Polymerization:
Toxicological Infor~ation
Toxicological Information;N/P
Ecological Informati.on
Ecological: N/P
'MSDS Transport lnformation
'J,'ransport Information:N/P
Reg~lat~ry Infonnation
Sara Title ill :Infornation: N/P

Federal Regulatory Information: N/P
St.ate Regulatory Information: N/P
Other lnformation
,.
i
OtberN/P
Informaon:
Hl\1IS H.AZC01\l Label
TOP
rroduct ID: RESIDUAL FUEL OIL,BDNlillR FUEL OIL

age:00033
Com pany BELCHER:. COMP ANY
Name:
Street: 9 GREENWAY PLAZA
Assigned IND: Y
PO Box:NIK.
------ ----- ...... --- ------ .. .
'
LL ..
11--~"" .,,.tf'\11'1'P'mmr.ecenter.com/dtSearch/dtisapi6.dll?cmd=getdoc&Docid=209204&...
9/11/2007
HMIS BHCPZ :RESIDUAL FUEL OIL,B1JNICER FUEL OIL

(
I
Ciiy: HOUSTON
Country:US
Page 6 of6
Zipcode: 77046.
Statc:TX
Realth Emergency Pl1one: 713-877-1400
Label Required IND: Y

.Status Code: C
La bel Date: 12116/1998.
Or~nationCode:G
Date OfLabel Revjew: 12/16/1998

MFG La bel N0:
Year Procured:N/K
Eye Protcction .IND: N/P
Chronic Hazard IND: N/P

Skin Protection IND: N/P
Signal Word: N/P
Respiratory Protection IND: N/P
Healtll Hazard:
Contact H~liard:
Fire Hazard:
Reactivity Haz;ird:
Bazard And Precautions
. PROLONGEb
AND REPEATED. SXJN CONTACTMAY CAUSEDBRMA.TITIS.MODERATELY
. .
m.RITATJNG TO SKJN. CAUSES REDNESS AND DRYJNG OF SKJN. IRRITATING TO MUCOUS
MEMBRANES AND RESPIR.ATORY TRAC.WILL PRODUCE SYMPTOMS OF INTOXICATION. CA
N ACT AS A SIMPLE ASPHYXIANT. INGESTION-MAY CAUSE :MILD EXCITATION,Il's&G.F
CONSCIOUSNESS,CONVULSIONS,CYANOSIS,CONGESTION AND CAPILLARY
j.'r>t~
HEMORRHAGING OF LUNGS/ORGA .
.
~,{~li~
UJtiJ L?i\
.This injom!ati01i ois de1ived from the Hazdrdous Material infamwtion System which is utilized by the U.S. Deparbnent of .
Defenseo h1.t:J;aWEB. LLC an its Distributors i~t no manner whatsoever, expressly or impliedwarrants, states, ar intends said
ilifo111tation to have any application use OJ' viability by or to any pe1son ar persoits. Any pers01i utilizing this information
slwuld seek conipetent professianal advice t? verify and assume 1esponsibility fot tlte suitability.ofth.is information to their
particular situatiOJI:
o
... -
-o---~----------.
---------"-7----- ...
-''-- ~-"" ""+MrP:!':rmrcecenter:com/dtS earch/dtisapi6. dll? cmd""=getdo c&Docld=209204&.:.

_.____ .______ ____;_ __ ..
9/11/2007
APPENDIX F
Sampling and Analysis Plan
PBS
for Remedial lnvestigation
1O East Bruneau
Kennwick, Washington
Prepared for:
Wlch's Foods
'
November 2007
Project # 61499.000
I
I.
Bandon
I Bend I Boise IEugene I Port\and I S~att\e \ Tri-Cities \ Vancouver

320 N Johnson Streat, Sute 100, Kennewick, WA 99336
'
509.735.2698 Main
509.735.1867 Fax
www.pbsenv.com
SAMPLING ANO ANALYSlS PLAN .

FOR REMEDlAL INVESTIGATION
Former Welch's Foods Facility
1OEast Bruneau
Prepared forWelch's Foods

This report ls for the exclusive use of the client and is not to be relied
upon by other partles. lt is not to be photographed, photocopied, or .
similarly reproduced in total oi" -in part without the expressed written
consent of the client anel PBS.
Prepared by
. PBS Engineering and Environmental
320 North.Johnson Street, Suite #100
Kennewick, Washington 99336
(509) 735~2698.
PBS Projed No: 61499.000
November 2007
---------
1OEast Bruneau
K.ennewick, Washington
Fonner Welch's Foods Facility
TABLE OF CONTE~TS
_1.0 JNTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................................l

1.1 Purpose
1
Background
Suromal'Y
2.01.2PROJECT
]\iANAGEMENT
............................................................... :......................,...............!I1
2
2.1 Project Communicatons
Schedule
3.02.2SITE
DJlSCRIPTION ......:................................................................................:................... ;......22
Previous Environm.ental Investigations and Findings
4.03:1REMEDIAL
INVESTIGATION ...................,..................................~.........................................34
4
4
4
4
5
5
4.1 Site Health and Safety Plan

4.2 Utility Loates
4.3 RI Soil Sampling

4.4 Monitoring Well Construction
4.5 Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring
4.6 Analytical Procedures
QA!QC Procedures
.
. ~
5.04.7REMEDIAL
INVESTiGATION REPORT ..:...........................................................................
6
5.1 DataEvaluation
Reporting
6.0.5.2SIGNATUREPAGE
..........,................................................................ ........................................7
SUPPORTING DATA
Figures ....................................................... :.... ,.........................., ... :........................................

Figure 1
Figure 2
.
T<~b 1
Site Vicinity Plan

Site Vicnity and Pr.oposed Sampling Map
.
Appendlx A ................................................................................................:.............: ............... Tab 2
Oecontamination, Documentation and Waste bisposal Procedures
Report Date: September 2007

Project #61499.000
1.0
INTRODUCTION .
1.1.
Purpose
PBS Engineering + Environmenta! (PBS) has prepared this Sampling and Analysis Plan
.for Remedial !nvestigation (SAP) for the Former Welch's Foods, Kennewick, Washington
site. The purpos of this study is to complete the delineation of the extent of soil and
grounlwater contamiration onste. PSS assumes that-the work will be conducted with
Washington State Department of Ecology (WOOE) oversight, and that documentation
will generally fo!!ow the forrnat provided in the Agreed Order (AO) between Welch's
Foods Inc. and the WDOE, as indicated in Exhibit 8 ot the AO. The AO establishes the
general scope requirements for th~ Remediallnvestigation (RI).
1.2
B.ackground ~ummary
The facility has hlstorically operated as a food . processing JUice facility since
approximately 1925. Welch's Foods recently operated the site until it was closed in
2005. Another company (J.Lieb Foods) recently occupied the site and is.providing food
processing and manufacturing vitamin water.
The large .50,000 gallon bunker fue! U$T was in the remova! process in September
2007. Gas lines that were in the way of the UST remova! were recently moved by
Cascade Natural Gas Company. The onsite boiler system had been converted to
natural gas, with no further need for fuel storage.
No tank leakage was observed during the UST decommissioning; further environmental
history ofthe sitE;J isprovided in $ection 3.1.
2.0
:PROJECT MANAGEMENT
2.1
Project Communications
The project team members and responsibilities for the final si~e characterization activities
are summarized in the following table:
Table 1. Pro'ect Team M.embers and Responsibilities

Welch's Foods
K~ith Naughton
Chuck Evans
Project Coordinator
Project Manager
Director of Manufacturing
J. Lieb Foods
Marty Gardner
Site Manager
PBS Engineering & Environmental

Paul Danielson, LHG
Dulcy Berri, LHG
Project Manager/Hydrogeologist
Principal Hydrogeologist/Reviewer
Tom Brooke.
WDOE
Mark Dunbar
WDOE Project Coordinator

Former Welch 's Foods Facility
;2..2
lO Easl Bruneau
Schedule
The schedule for completing the proposed activities is summarized in the foliowing table.
The timing of.this schedule was prepared by PBS from review of Exhibit. B of the arder
(Schedule for Work}.
Table 2. Proposed Shedule for Remediallnvestigation and Reporting

';~;~,1if~;~~.rJ~~-~';!!~~i--~~IJ;:;:.f;r~:-M} t~~~~~~:~1fl.!~r:.~J5/I~;~i!(!=i1K~j,,1!~~!L!~!;<{;i=;?:i~i~:/g1i!it!::~:::};;i~~~J-'!!J~::~!-~ fT.i.Jh.f!:,~t;f:JJ.~f-fffSt.e::l;!;~~!;~~,~~tf~H~ jt;i;:i:I0b.mlJ~:,tiD_ffl~l:at~f~li=:j1~
Prepare Draft SAP

Prepare HASP
Ecology Comment on SAP
Final SAP to Ecology .
Well lnsta!lation and Soil Samp!ing
First Quarter of Groundwater Monitoring
Draft Remediallnv!;lstigation Report to Ecology
Ecology Comments of Draft Report
Final Remediai Jnvestigation Report to Ecology
3.0
September 24, 2007

October 7, 2007
October14, 2007
October.21, 2007
November 5, 2001
December 9, 2007
December 16, 2007.
February 4, 2008
February 18, 2008
October 7, 2007
October 14 2007
October 21, 2007
November 5, 2007
December 9, 2007
Decernber 16, 2007
FebruaJY 4, 2008
February_ .18 2008
March .1, 2008
SJTE DESCRIPTION .
The point of contaminant release is .located within the former Welch's Foods facility,
located at 10 East Bruneau Street, Ken.newick, .Bento"n County, Washington (Figure 1);
The property is located on the southeast comer of the Washington. Street and Bruneau
Stree.t intersection within Benton County Parcel Number #106802030001022. The
property is further described as located in Township 8 North, Range 30 East, NW X of
Sectin 6. For the purposes of. the environmental. issues regarding the AO, the Site is
defined as the extent of contamination caused by the release and not the boundaries of
the property the release originated from. rnere remains the possibility that the Site
could include ther parcels if contamination migrated off of the former Welch's Foods
property.
! .
3.1
Previous Environnientallnvestigations and Findings
A Phase 11 Environmental Site Assessment was completed by Blue Mountain

Environmental on the subject property in January 2006, to assess whether leakage had
occurred onto the property from a 50,000 gallon UST. This geoprobe drilling project,
which did not test groundwater, found no .contamination.
PBS completed a Phase I Environmental Site As.sessment (PBS Project #61375.00) in
July 2006. This assessment recommended a Phase 11 Environmental Assessment to
~est groundwater adjacent to the 50,000 gallon UST and in other areas of the site.
.I
A Phase 11 Envifonmental Site Assessment was completed by PBS in July and August
2006 (PBS Project #61396.00). That assessment, which used an air-rotary drill system,
located grount:lwater and soil contamination approximately 40 feet west of the Boiler
building at or near water :tble elevation at 20 feet below ground surf~ce (bgs). The
Report Date: November 2007
Project: #61499.000
2
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - --
Sampling and Analysis Plon

1OEast Bruneau
boring that discovered the contamination was immec,fiately adjacent to a 2" oil fine that
trended from the 50,000 gallon UST to the Boiler building.
In early. August, 2006, PBS oversaw environmental excaVtion along the oil -fine that .
trended from the 50,000 gal!on UST to the boiler building (PBS Project #61405.00). Nci
oil contam_inated soil was found along .the oi! line, this finding prompted further study._
Review of plans and early photographs-ofthe si te indicated that two 12,000 gallon USTs
containing bunker fuel were removed from the site. in the 1980s. The earlier UST
locatioris were approximately 15 feet south of contaminated Boring #4 (from the previous
Phase 11). Further excavation was then proposed to the south at the fornier location of
the earlier USTs.
Later in August 2006, excavation and lndependent Remedial Action {WAC 173-340-515)
was completed further south, with signficant contamination located. The independent
action was conducted to meet the purposes of an lnterim Remedial Action (WAC 173340-430) as a good faith effort by Welchs to reduce soil contamination in a timely
manner. The excavation contractor removed approximately .516 cubic yards of
contaminated soil from the soil and upper contaminated groundwater zone beneath the
former locations of the USTs on August 10 through 17th, 2006 (PBS Project #61405.00).
of-
The lnterim Remedial Action was intended to aid in reducing the source
saturated
contaminated oil in soil over the groundwater to discourage further oil movement to
groundwater. The full known extent of oil contamination in the soil was excavated and
removed. Contamination within the groundWater zone was less known and not fully
removed .. Contamination was known to have migrated to the north, with. groundwater,
where it was detected in the earlier Phase 11 .. With the specific gravity of the fuel product
at 0.97,.-the greater appearance of contamination at the water table surface in Boring #4
and the lack of volatiles in Phase 11 water samp!es collected, we assume most of the oil
contamination in groundwater is near the surface of the water table in ali areas. The oil
appeared to be very soll bound, with little tendency to dissolve or travei with
groundwater.
The extent of the lnterim Remedial Action effort was limited by the location of buildings
and utilities on the site and the depth that the trackhoe co1,lld effectiv!31y work and still
protect surrounding infrastructure. Contaminated soil and clean sai! from the excavation
area was removed to the northeast comer of the site, with ccintaminated soil Jater hauled
tothe Rabanco facility in Roosevelt, Washington for final dispos_al. The dean soil, plus
offsite clean soil, was later used to help backfill the excavation-zme.
4.0
PROPOSEP REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
The AO drjven RI process is intended. to aid delineation of the extent of groundwater

. contamination .onsite; soil contamination was previously removed and disposed. The RI, along
with the eiwironmental information gatheredfrom the earlier work, will lay the groundwork for
cleanup options for the site. This information is to be used at a !ater time to plan a cleanup
Feasibility Study (FS). The FS is not a part of the investigation at this time, but is a component
of the AO and is required for completion of the AO. This SAP will be submitted to Welch's
Foods and WDOE as the first portion of the RI pracess. The future components of the RI are
discussed:
Project: #61499.000
Sanipling and Analysis Plan

Fonner Welcb's Foods Facility
4.1
1OEast Bruneau
Site f:iealth and Safety Plan

A Site Health and Safety Plan (HASP) will be submitted for W.DOE:. review approximately
one week after comphition ofthis SAP. The HASP will be completed in conjunction with
the safety issues foreseen in the proposed RI project for PBS personnel, the cwrrent site
occupant (J. Lieb Foods), Welch's Foods, and the.future site workers.
4.Z
Utility Locates
A utility locate will be requestec.l from the one-calllocate s~rvice prior to completing the
RI. A private locator will be used, if necessary, to !acate priv.ate utilities. Once the utilty
locating is completed, this information will be compiled onto a site plan.
4.3
RI Soil Sampli"ng
The 2006 Phase 11 Environmental Assessment (#61396.00) and the Remedial Action
Report (#61405.00) were compiled by PBS and helped.to de!ineate soil and groundwater
contamination on the property. The propos~d RI soil sampling will further .characterize
the soil in the proposed we.n locations to support the final RI report.
Figure 2 shows th proposed locations for monitorilig wells. These locations may be
. adjusted for drilling access, utility conflicts or recommendations from Welch's, J. Lieb or
WDOE. An air rotary drill Will be used for comp!eting the project; the heavy gravei and
cobble fcirmation beneath the site will not allow use ofother drilling methods. A Joggeci
description of the soil (Unified Method) and environmental parameters will be recorded
(including grain size, calor, nioisture, odor and volatiles). Soil samples
be collected.
at from approximately 15 to 22 feet below ground surface (ar where other zones of
contaminqtion are suspected). See Appendix A for further field procedures concerning
decontamination~ documentation, photographs, soillwater drum storage and disposal.
wi)l
4.4
Monitoring Well Construction .

A major purpose of the onsite ~rilling wil! be the construction of monito_ring wells. The
wells will be completed within borngs provided by an air rotary drill. Wells will be
c01istructed in accordance wth WDOE monitoring wel! construction regulations provided
in WAC Chapter 173-160 and 173~162. Wells will be constructed with 2" casings to a
depth of at least 6 feet be!ow the surface of the unconfined groundwater table elevation
(27 feet bgs). With the 1.,1se of 10 feet of screened casing, approximately 4 feet of screen
will .be prepared above the water table. One well will be constructed upgradient of the
location of the contamination, with two wells (or more if necessat1t) constructed
downgradient. Wells will be constructed in such a configuration that the top of casing
can be surveyed and the surface of the groundwater table can be determined, along with
groundwater flow direction and gradient. Well surveying will be completed by PBS, with
an accuracy of 0.01 feet vertical accuracy measured against a relativa datum.
4.5
Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring

Quarterly groundwater monitoring is planned to begin one week after the wells have
been constructed. Ali three wells wll be monitored and sampled. Prior to sampling
Project:_#61499.000

1OEast Brunea,u
monitoring wells, water table elevations will be recorded by PBS with a11 electronic water.
levei indicator. PBS will use bailers ora 12 volt submersible pump to purge and sample
the monitoring wells. Prior to sampling, each well will be purged with a!l estimated 3 well
casing volumes of water removd.
Concurrently with purging, the. groundwater
parameters of conductivity, pH, arid temperatura will be recorded with a water quality.
meter, until these parameters have stabilized. Laboratory-manufactured conductivity and
pH standar solution values will be recorded during purging to check data accuracy. A!!
. waste water generated from sampling and purging will be hel.d on the property, in drums,
until the initial analysis of the groundwater samples is complete. Drums wil! need to be .
. sampled for disposal as indic;:1ted by the results of the groundwater analysis (see
Appendix A).
4.6
Analytical Procedures
. Qnce the conductivity, pH and t~mperature parameters have stabilized during the well
purging process, sampling will be completed by. collecting well water from the purged
well system into laboratory-cleaned one-liter amber_jars. or 40-milliliter VOAs. Any
reused sampling tools will be decontaminatel as indiated in Appendix A Preservatives .
will be added as needed and requested by fhe !ab; no preservatives are planned at this
time. Sai! samples co!lected during the drilling. process will be collected into 4 ounce
glass jars for submission to a _laboratory. All.collected samples will be stored in a cooler
with ice until released to a certified laboratory, with chain of custody documentation,
within the holding time for the analytical process.
Proposed soil and groundwater atialytical. procedures .wi!l be performed as indiated iri
Section VIl (3) of the AO. Testing will be designed to determine whether the following
hazardous substances have been released at the Site: petroleum products, benzene,
toluene, ethyl. benzene, xylenes, carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs),
and napthalenes, Petroleum products are tested through northwF:st total petroleum
hydrocarbons - diesel ~ethods _(NWTPH-Dx). The list. of eonstituents and analytical"
procedures is provided be!ow:
Constituent
Petroleum Products (Qil)
Petroleum Products (heavy oil)
Benzene
Toluene
Ethyl benzene
Xylenes .
PAHs
Napthalenes
Proposed Analytical Procedures

EPA Method 8015M (NWTPH-Dx)
.EPA Method 8015M (NWTPH-Dx Extended)
EPA Method 80218
EPA Method 8021 8
EPA Method 80~1 8
EPA Method 80218
EPA Method 8270C
EPA Method 8270 SIM
PBS proposes to use Friedman and Bruya, Environmental Laboratory in Seattle,

Washington to complete analytical analysis for the project.
4.7
. QAIQC Procedures
Sample QAJQC will include collecting one duplicata grolindwater sample and soil sample
during the RI process which will 'be submitted to the laboratory blind-labeled. The
Project: #61499.000
----------
-------
Sarnpling and Analysis Plan

Fonner Welch's Foods Faclity
1OEast Bruneau
Kennewick, Washin,iton
duplicate will be numbered separately for comparison to the initial sample, with results
provided in the RI report. Excessiva deviation between the duplicatas and initial
samples will trgger further QNQC procedures. The labon;~tory's daily batch quality
contrai testing will also be reviewed for data qua.lity.
5.()
REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION REPORT
5.1
Data Evaluation
The results of the RI soil and groundwater testing (including the results . of the first
groundwater monitoring event) will be compiled into tables aiong with data from the
earlier investigations. These data will be compared 'to WDOE Method A and CLARC
(Method B) tables for unrestricted and industrial settings. For data exceeding these
parameters, PBS will. evaluate the input parameters for site-specific data wherever
possible and consd.er risk assessment Most risk assessment evaluation s expected to
be addressed during the FS stage of the future project to support incorporation of a final
cleanup option. .
lt should be noted that the access limitations placed on drilling activities due to the
existing bildngs and utilities may result in incompleta contamination delineation at the
site. Additional drilling ar other environmental assessment may needed (or requested by
WDOE) if the initial Rl results suggest further work is necessary.
5.2 Reporting
A report wfll be prepared that details the RI. The report -will include rriethodology,
sainpling. results, a site pln showing sample locations, tables summarizing previous and
new data, discussion . of the laboratory results and copies of laboratory report~ and
chain..:of-custody documentation. A PBS Washington-Licensed Hydrogeologist will
complete the report. PBS management staff will provide review; a draft copy will be
submitted to Welch's Foods and then WDOE for review.
The report will provide the technical baseline for potentiaJ additional RI work and the
future FS that will evaluate cleani.Jp options for the property as outlined in Exhibit B in the
Order.
lhe RI report, which details the well installation and soil/groundwater testing is planned
to be completed by March 1, 2008, and will include the findings of the first round of
quarterly groundwater monitoring. Jf desired, subsequent monitoring events {May,
August and October 2008) can be reported separately as brief quarterly mcinitoring
reports provided to Welch's Foods and WDOE. lt is possible that results of the three
quarters of monitoring could charige the focus ofthe future Fs.
Report Date: N ovember 2007

Project: #61499.000
6
~-~
-- --- ---------
10 East Bruneau

6.0
SIGNATURE PAGE.
Paul Danielson; L:RG

Project Manager, Hydrogeologist
~~
Duky A. Bcrri. R.G. .
Pr:l ncipallS.U.ior H)'dro~logist
Report Date: N ovember 2007

Project: #61499.000
----------'
--------
~-
.. -- -
---~---- -~--
SampliDg and Analysis PJan

Fonner Welch's Foods Facility
10 EastBruneau
FIGURES

Project: #61499.000
~---------------
- -
----
-----
@.
@
DFFICE
---7---.. .--...,
. B-S
. auNKER . .[-~
FUEL
\
LIMIT DF SOIL
CONTAMINATlON
[AND EXCAVATED
I .'
0.
--~
EXISTIN
-----
-,.,
.fi,
~
-~
r-1
;;\
8
I I
II
--------' ...
. . .
I
I .
I :
I
ec:: .l
I
I
I.
'
. $,
--
/ .
.
-~
ESTIMATED LIMIT DF
GROUNDWATER CQNTA!v\INATIDN
B-3
BORING LDCATIDNS FRDM

PREVIOUS JDB#Bi396
PRDPDSED MONITDRING
WELL LDCATIDN
"'
"'~
APPROXlMATE SALE: l" "'20'
d,
.:;)
~.s
o
~
-'
PRJ::PARED FOR: ' WELCH'S FOODS
PROJECT#
-~
BOI LER
BUILDING
LEGEND
g5
I.L,
' '......_
.
. RA.ILRDAO
ARtA
1.
I!M-11~1
"@ \
~
:?,
RASTRUCTUR"'
I
I I
I
.
\<:~j.i
L___ JI::.. __ JI
..
li
I l. I
I 1- I I 1- I
I
I
I Ul . I I Ul l
1::>11::>1.
IC::'IIC::I
\
\.f
., -~'
G GAs LINE INi=
r---l r----1"":\
l\. . j
. .
'.\
ARE!>::fl1405.00D)
'
--"--~~----. _,. _J
/"
.
~
...
I ..
~-
---'
COVERED WALKWAY
61499.000
PBS
DTE
SEPT. 2007
SAMPLING ANO ANALYSIS PLAN FOR REMEDIA INVESTIGATION

. KENNEWICK, WASHINGTON
FIGURE
10 East Brunea
Sarnpling and Analysis Plan

Fonner Welch's F.oods Facilty
APPENDIXA

Project: #61499.000
9
PBS
------------------~----------~-----
APPENDIXA
1.0
EQIDPMENT DECONTAMINATION PROCEDURES

Decontamination of field equipment is performed to minimize the potential for
transfer _of potentially contaminated materiais to uncontaminated areas, to
minimize the exposure of personnel to hazardous substances, and to reduce the
possibility of cross-contamination between samples.
1.1
Personal Protective Equipment and Worker Decontamination

Personal protective equipment (PPE) will be wom in accordance with the Health
and Safety Plan (HASP) prepared for this project. In addition to protecting
workers, PPE also helps to reduce the possibility of cross-contamination. Worker
decontamination zones are not requrred for the remedial investigation.
1.2
Equipment Decontamination
Wherever practical, new disposable sampling equipment (e.g. pump tubing) will
be used to collect each sample and will then be discarded to eliminate the need for
decontamination.
Soil sampling equipment that will be reused (such as scoops, spoons, and drilling
equipment) will be decontaminated to prevent cross-contamination between
samples.
The larger boring equipment will be decontaminated between boreholes and
before demobilization with apressure washer.
For smaller sampling equipment, such as scoops, spoons nd bowls, the
decontamination will occur between each use. Smaller sampling equipment that
cannot be cleaned with apressure washer will be decontaminated as follows:
Remove visible soil and material from equipment.

Wash equipment with a non-phosphate detergent (i.e., Alconox) solution
in tap water.
Thoroughly rinse with tap or distilled water.
Field measurement equipment will be kept clean to ensure accurate

and to prevent cross-contamination.
p~rformance
2.0
PROJECT DOCUMENTATION PROCEDURES
During the course of the investigation, all field activities will be documented
using one or more ofthe following methods:
Field noteboolc
Soil boring log
Photographs
2.1
Field N otebook
Field personnel will use a field notebook to record any pertinent information and
to describe sampling procedures. Notes may include sketches of actual boring
locations, visual and olfactory characteristics of the soil and water sampled, time
of sample collection, and other relevant information. In addition to the
investigation data, the following site activity records will be recorded in the field
notebook:
Time of arrival and departure :from the site

Project personnel and subcontractor personnel onsite
Equipment calibration records
Health and safety monitoring records, such as breatbing zone monitoring
Dispo sal and storage of investigation-derived waste
After completion of the sampling activities, the field notebook will be stored in
the custody ofPBS Engineering and Environmental.
2.2
Soil Boring Log
Soil boring logs will be completed for each boring advanced at the site. Grain
size, color, moisture, odor and other field observations will be noted on these
logs.
2.3
Photographs
Photographs taken during field investigative activities will be recorded in the field
notebook with the following infonnation:
Date and time of photograph

Compass direction (N/S/E/W) in whichpicture was taken
Description of activity or condition seen in photograph
3.0
INVESTIGATION-DERIVED WASTE
During environrnental field investigations, investigation-derived waste (IDW) will be

generated. The investigations are expected to produce the following waste:
Drill cuttings (soil) and soil sampling waste
-Equipment decontamination water
Non-media waste such as direct push liners, disposable gloves, etc.
The dispo sal of each type of waste is addressed below.
3.1
Containment of Soil and Drilling Fluids
All potentially contaminated soil sampling waste, drilling cuttings and fluids will
be contained within 55-gallon drums. Each drum will be labeled with the project
name and "Property ofWelch's Foods". The label shall also contain the type of
media (soil, drilling fluid), drum number, the date filled and the borehole(s) from
which the media originated.
Drums containing contaminated or suspected contaminated cuttings will be
identified on the drum inventory as such. Based on results of earlier work on the
site, hazardous waste is not expected to be generated during tl:iis investigation.
Drums will be sampled later for suspected contaminants and disposed as needed.
3.2
Containment ofWater
Water resulting from equipment decontamination shall be contained within 55gallon drums. The drums shall be labeled as noted previously and sampled and
disposed as needed by Welch's.
3.3
Containment of Non-media Waste
During the course of the field investigations, waste such as direct push liners,
disposable gloves, plastic bags and other disposable items will be generated.
Typically, these items are classified as solid waste and can be disposed of through
regular solid waste streams by the driller or PBS. PBS will take care to minimize
the inclusion of these items in the drum-contained media.
3.4
Storage and Management of Drums
Drums shallbe labeled and covers secured prior to placement in a Welch's andlor
Lieb Foods designated storage area on the subj ect property.
PBS will maintain a drum inventory table of all drums generated during the
investigation and will make a copy ofthis inventory available to Welch's Foods.
3.5
Disposal ofDrums
Welch's Foods is designated as being responsible for arranging for proper

dispo sal of drums generated during environmental investigations.
APPENDIX G
Groundwater Flow Direction lnformation
Project #61499.00
Groundwater Flow Gradient and Direction
Station
MW#1
MW#2
MW#3
Reference GW Elevation
79.32
79.25
79.26
Complete reference line from highest to lowest groundwater elevation (MW # 1 to MW

#2)
Distance between MW # 1 and MW #2 = 98 feet
Change of depth between MW #1 and MW #2 = 79.32- 79.25 = 0.07 feet
Depthrange ascribed to MW #3 ~ 79.26-79.25 = 0.01 feet
0.01
0.07
0.14 or 14%
98' x O.14 = 17.72 feet; Therefore the line of equal groundwater table elevation on the
line from MW.#1 to MW #2 is 17.72 feet from MW #2 (see attached drawing).
The downgradient flow direction is perpendicular to the equal elevation line and forms a
bearing ofNorth 4 East.
.
Gradient and Depth Range
Gradient is 0.07 feet per 98 feet or
0.07
98 feet
100' (0.07)
98 feet
X
100 feet
=
X= 0.071 feet/100 feet gradient
Project #61499.00
Hydraulic Conductivity and Velocity Estimation
Hydraulic conductivity is estimated in the upper portion ofthe unconfined aquifer.
Although pump tests or slug tests are preferred, that information was not available for
this project. Unit consists of a clean sandy Gravei (GP). From Bowles and Walton, 1998
the hydraulic conductivity is estimated at 1 x 102 feet per day (100 feet per day).
Groundwater velocity and gradient are correlated through Darcy' s Law:
Groundwater velocity (V) = -K dhldx
-K = hydraulic conductivity in feet per day (-in a downgradient direction)
dhldx = hydraulic gradient in feet per 100 feet
100 feet x 0.071 feet
Day
100 feet
1 day
0.071
0.071 feet'per day
14.08 days per foot of groundwater trvel at the given gradient
High gradient and higher velocity are expected in the spring and summer when irrigation.
canais infiltrate into the system so estimated flow velocity is considered low end.
In 20 years since tank closure the groundwater flow distance is estimated to be:
20 years x 365 days per year = 7,300 days
7,300
14.08
518 feet distance water has travelled in 20 years (low end number).
APPENDIXH
Oil Release Approximations
Project #61499.00
Soil Oil Loading, Fuel Spill Volume and Oil vs Water Flow Distance
Interim Remedial Action contaminated soil analytical results indicated diesel and oil
contamination as high as 8,900 mg/kg diesel and 12,000 mg/kg oil.
8,900
12,000
20,900 mg/kg total (milligrams of product per kilogram of soil)
Estimated 60' diameter of soil contamination related to the groundwater sm~ar zone at
1.5' thickness. Estimated 25'diameter of soil contamination above the water table ata
thickness of 7'.
Area of Circle = R2n
Area of Cylinder = R2n x h
3 .14 x 3 02 x 1. 5 = 4,23 9 cubic feet of contaminated soil in smear zone.
3.14 x 12.5 2 x 7 = 3,434 cubic feet of conta.nlinated soil above the water table.
One cubic foot ofthe clean sandy gravei weighs approximately 130 pounds I cubic foot.
One kilogram = 2.2 pounds
130 pounds
= 59.1 kilograms/cubic foot
2.2 pounds!kilogram
Weight of contaminated zone soil = 59.1 x 7,673 cubic feet = 453,474 kilograms
Each kilogram of soil contains 20,900 milligrams of product.
or
20,900 mg x 1 gram x 1 kilogram = 20,900
1,000 mg 1,000 grams 1,000,000
0.0209 kilograms
0.0209 kilograms ofproduct per kilogram of soil

0.0209 x 453,474 = 9,478 kilograms of oil total
2.2 pounds/ kilogram x 9,478 kilograms = 20,852 pounds of oil
Specific Gravity of water = 1.0
Specific Gravity of oil = 0.97
7.48 gallons/cubic foot, volume
62.4 pounds ofwater/cubic foot
62.4
7.48
8.34 pounds ofwater I gallon
20,852 pounds of oil

8.34 pounds/gallon
-2,500 gallons
0.97
2,500 gallons of oil total
2,577 gallons ofoil released (approximately)
Oil transport at the site has been shown by boring and well construction to be less than 70
feet.
Water has moved a minimum of 518 feet in the 20 year time period since the USTs were
removed.
70 feet
518 feet
0.135 or 13.5% distance of oil transport compared to water.

Investigação para Remediação - Modelo de Relatório

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Investigação para Remediação - Modelo de Relatório

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

-

Welch's Foods, Inc.

320 N Johnson Street, Sute 100, Kennewick, WA 99336

Forme r Weldi's Facility

Former Welch's Facility

Former Welch's Facility

Former Welch's Facility

Former Welch's Facility

Proposed Analytical Procedures

Former Welch's Facility

April 2008Project No.: 61499.00

Former Welch's Facility

Forme r Welch's Facility

PBS ENGINEERING + ENVIRONMENTAL

Duky A. Bc::ni, R.G.

SCALE: 1" = 2,000'

PREPARED FOR: WELCH'S FOODS

10 EAST BRUNEAU AVENUE

CALCULATED GROUNDWATER FLOW

BORING LOCATIONS FROM

MONITORING WELL LOCATION

APPROXlMATE SCA LE: I" 20'

1 EAST BRUNEAU AVENUE

----- --- ------------

Benzo g,h,i perylene

Dibenz a,h anthracene

lndeno I ,2,3-cd pyrene

Soil samples collectoo from 15 to 16 feet below ground surface

PHOTO 1: LOOKING WEST AT MONITORING WELL #3 CONSTRUCTION

PHOTO 2: LOOKING NORTH WEST AT PREPARATION TO BUILD MONITORING

PHOTO 3: DRILLING MONITORING WELL #3, LOOKING EAST

PHOTO 4: LOOKING EAST AT THE CONSTRUCTION OF MONITORING WELL #2

WeJI Canstruction Delails

B ore Hole/W ell Construction Lo g

TOC Elevation (feet rei ative datum): 100.67

0-0.5'': Surfacing is FROZEN.

0.5"-3.5': Loose, brown, medium coarse SAND, moist,

Pro ject Number:

10.5'-18.5': Medi um dense, gray-brown SAND with gravei,

18.5'-28.25': Dense, gray-browns, sandy GRAVEL, very

SOIL INTERFACES ANO OESCRIPTIONS ARE INTERPRETIVE ANO

WATER LEVEL 15 FOR DATE SHOWN ANO MAY VAR.Y 'Mll-1

3. SOIL OESCRIPTIONS NOT INTENOEO TO BE USEO FOR

Bore Hole/Well Construction Log

Well Construction Details

Saf Descrip tion

TOC Elevotion (feet relotive dotum): 100.67

18.5'-28.25': Dense, gray-browns,"sandy GRAVEL, very

SOIL INTERFACES AND DESCRIPT10NS ARE IN1ERPRET1VE AND

WATER LEVEL IS FOR DATE SHOWN ANO MAY VARY V..TH

3. SOIL DESCRIPT10NS NOT INTENOED 10 BE USEO FOR

Well Construction Details

TOC Elevation (feet rei ative datum): 100.03

Bore Hole/VVell Construction Log

0-0.5'': Surfacing is ASPHALT.

SOIL INTERFACES ANO OESCRIPTIONS ARE INTERPRETIVE ANO

WAlER LEVEL IS fOR DATE SHOWN ANO 1.4AY VARY WITH

3. SOIL DESCRIPTIDNS NOT INTENOED TO BE USEO FOR

GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN PURPOSES.

Bore Hole/Well Construction Log

Pro ject Nome:

We/1 Construction Detaifs

Pro ject Number:

TOC Elevotion (feet relotive dotum): 100.03