Professional Documents
Culture Documents
esthetic restoration. These advanced placement techniques offer benefits such as enhanced chromatic integration, polychromatism, ideal anatomical form and function, optimal proximal contact, improved marginal integrity
and longer lasting directly placed composite restorations.
The purpose of this article is to give the reader a better
understanding of the complex restorative challenge in
achieving true harmonization of the primary parameters in
esthetics (that is, color, shape and texture) represented by
the replacement of a single anterior tooth. The case presented demonstrates the restoration of a Class IV fracture
integrating basic adhesive principles with these placement techniques and a recently developed nanoparticle
hybrid composite resin system (Premise, Kerr/Sybron,
Orange, CA). The clinical presentation describes preopera-
In composite resin technology, particle size and the amount of particles represent crucial information in determining how best to use
the composite materials.Alteration of the filler component remains
the most significant development in the evolution of composite
resins,7 because filler particle size, distribution and the quantity
incorporated dramatically affect the mechanical properties and the
clinical success of composite resins.8 In general, mechanical and
physical properties of composites improve in relationship to the
amount of filler added. Many of the mechanical properties depend
upon this filler phase, including compression strength and/or hardness, flexural strength, the elastic modulus, coefficient of thermal
expansion, water absorption and wear resistance.
Nanotechnology or molecular manufacturing9 may provide
composite resin with filler particle size that is dramatically smaller
in size, can be dissolved in higher concentrations and polymerized
into the resin system with molecules that can be designed to be compatible when coupled with a polymer, and provide unique characteristics (physical, mechanical and optical). In addition, optimizing
the adhesion of restorative biomaterials to the mineralized hard tissues of the tooth is a decisive factor in enhancing the mechanical
strength and marginal adaptation and seal, while improving the reliability and longevity of the adhesive restoration.
Currently, the particle sizes of conventional composites are so
dissimilar to the structural sizes of the hydroxyapatite crystal, dental tubule and enamel rod, there is a potential for compromises in
adhesion between the macroscopic (40 nm to 0.7 um) restorative
material and the nanoscopic (1 nm to 10 nm in size) tooth structure.10 However, nanotechnology has the potential to improve this
continuity between the tooth structure and the nano-sized filler
particle and provide a more stable and natural interface between
Figure 2. Custom-fabricated
shade tabs were developed
from composite material and
compared to existing tooth
structure.
A
Figure 3. Chamfer
0.3 mm in depth was
placed 2 mm long
around entire margin.
Figure 4. 0.5 mm
scalloped bevel was
placed with long,
tapered diamond bur.
Figure 5.
Preparation was
cleaned with 2%
chlorhexidine.
Figure 8. Glycerin
was applied to proximal
surface of maxillary
right central using
un-waxed floss as
separating medium.
A thin layer of resin can be applied and cured to create a light diffusion layer and provide an illusion of depth for restorations of
limited thickness. This translucent layer will cause an internal diffusion of light and control luminosity within the internal aspect of
the restoration.20 A white tint (Kolor Plus, Kerr/Sybron, Orange, CA) was
placed along the fracture line and on specific regions in the vertical
invaginations corresponding to the schematic color mapping diagram of the contralateral central and light cured for 40 seconds
(Figure 11). A gray tint (Kolor Plus, Kerr/Sybron, Orange, CA) was placed
on specific regions in the vertical invaginations corresponding to
the schematic color mapping diagram of the contralateral central
and light cured for 40 seconds (Figure 12). This internal character-
Figure 13. (A) Super-clear translucent shaded hybrid was placed at the incisal
third of tooth. (B) Precut mylar strip was placed and adapted over facial surface
to achieve smooth surface and light cured.
NYSDJ AUGUST/SEPTEMBER 2005 33
A
Figure 14. To reproduce natural form
and texture, initial
contouring was
performed with #30
fluted, needle-shaped
finishing bur.
Figure 18. (A) Definitive polish and high luster were accomplished
with soft goat hair bush with composite polishing paste. (B) With
cloth wheel using staccato motion.
Finishing focuses on contouring, adjusting, shaping and smoothing the restoration, while polishing concentrates on producing a
smooth surface luster and highly light-reflective surface.23 The
final restorative phase was achieved by contouring and finishing
the restoration, which remains critical to the enhancement of
esthetics and the longevity of the restored teeth.24,25 To reproduce
the shape, color and gloss of the natural dentition, while enhancing the esthetics and longevity of the restoration, the following
protocol was implemented.
Surface texture of composite restorations is relatively hard to
achieve, demanding intensive training and meticulous attention to
technique coupled with very attentive observation of natural teeth.
In this case,particular attention was given not only to the relationship
between the expanse and direction of the marginal ridge, lingual
fossa and the anatomic variations of the teeth that will be adjacent
to the restoration, but also to the light refraction and surface reflection resulting from microstructure of the tooth surface.26
The initial contouring was performed with a series of finishing
burs to replicate form and texture. The facial contouring was initiated with #30 fluted, needle-shaped burs (BluWhite Diamonds and
Carbides, #7714, Kerr/Sybron, Orange, CA) (Figure 14). The lingual surfaces
were contoured with #30 fluted, football-shaped burs (BluWhite
Diamonds and Carbides, #9406, Kerr/Sybron, Orange, CA) (Figure 15).
Finishing the proximal, facial and incisal angles was performed
with aluminum oxide disks and finishing strips (Figure 16). These
were used sequentially according to grit, and ranged from coarse to
extra fine. For characterization, finishing burs, diamonds, and rubber wheels and points were used to create indentations, lobes and
ridges (Figure 17). The definitive polish and high luster was accomplished with a soft white goat hair brush with composite polishing
paste (Diamond Polishing Paste, Kerr/Sybron, CA) and a cloth wheel using
staccato motion (Figures 18 A,B).
The contact was tested with unwaxed floss to ensure the
absence of sealant in the contact zone, to verify adequate contact
and the absence of a gingival overhang, and to inspect the margins.
34 NYSDJ AUGUST/SEPTEMBER 2005
The rubber dam was removed, and the patient was asked to perform closure without force and then centric, protrusive and lateral
excursions.Any necessary occlusal equilibration was accomplished
with a 30-micron, egg-shaped finishing diamond bur, and the final
polish was repeated.
The surface quality of the composite is influenced not only by
the polishing instruments and polishing pastes, but also by the
composition and filler characteristics of the composite.27 The newer
formulations of nanocomposites with smaller particle size, shape
and orientation, and increased filler concentration provide
improved physical, mechanical and optical characteristics.Although
clinical evidence of polishability with these new nanoparticle
hybrids appears promising, the long-term durability of the polish
will need to be evaluated in future clinical trials.
The completed restoration reveals the harmonious integration
of composite with natural tooth structure that can be achieved
while developing an optimal proximal contact and marginal
integrity in the interproximal zone through the use of incremental
layering of composite resin and the proximal adaptation technique
(Figures 19 A, B).
Conclusion
This article has reviewed the advances in composite resin technology and provided a detailed description of the preparation design,
restoration and finishing protocol for a Class IV fracture on a maxillary left central incisor using a nanoparticle composite resin system, Premise.
Figures 19 A, B. Postoperative facial view of restored central incisor. Note harmonious integration of composite with natural tooth structure in interproximal zone.
11. Fahl N Jr., Denehy GE, Jackson RD. Protocol for predictable restoration of anterior teeth
with composite resins. Pract Perio Aesthet Dent 1995;7(8):13-21.
12. Winter R.Visualizing the natural dentition. J Esthet Dent 1993;5(3):102-117.
13. Liebenberg WH. Successive cusp build-up: an improved placement technique for posterior direct resin restorations. J Canad Dent Assoc 1996;62(6):501-507.
14. Liebenberg WH. General field isolation and the cementation of indirect restorations:
Part 1. J Dent Assoc of South Afr 1994; 49(7): 349-353.
15. Croll TP. Alternative methods for use of the rubber dam. Quint Int 1985;16:387-392.
16. Bichacho N. Direct composite resin restorations of the anterior single tooth: clinical
implication and practical applications. Compend 1996;17(7): 796-802.
17. Kanca, J III. Improving bond strength through etching of dentin and bonding to wet
dentin surfaces. J Am Dent Assoc 1992(123):35-43.
18. Nakabayashi N, Nakamura M,Yasuda, N. Hybrid layer as a dentin-bonding mechanism.
J Esthet Dent 1991;3(4):133-138.
19. Kanca J III. Resin bonding to wet substrate. II. Bonding to enamel. Quint Int.
1992;23(9):625-627.
20. Vanini L. Light and color in anterior composite restorations. Pract Periodont Aesthet
Dent 1996;8(7):673-682.
21. Muia PJ. Esthetic Restorations: Improved Dentist-Laboratory Communication. Carol
Stream, IL: Quintessence Publishing 1993: 86-87.
22. Sturdevant CM, Roberson TM, Heymann HO, et al. The Art and Science of Operative
Dentistry. 3rd Ed. St. Louis: Mosby-Year 1995: 592.
23. Schwartz RS, Summitt JB, Robbins JW. Finishing and Polishing. In: Fundamentals of
Operative Dentistry: A Contemporary Approach. Carol Stream, IL:Quintessence
Publishing Co. Inc. 1996:201-205.
24. Jefferies SR, Barkmerier M, Gwinnett AJ. Three composite finishing systems: a multisite
in vitro evaluation. J Esthet Dent 1992;4(6):181-185.
25. Goldstein RE. Finishing of composites and laminates. Dent Clin North Am 1999;
33(2): 305-318.
26. Hegenbarth EA. Teeth and Esthetics. In: Creative Ceramic Color: A Practical System.
Chicago, IL: Quintessence 1989:9-36.
27. Jefferies Sr, Smith RL, Barkmeier WW, et al. Comparison of surface smoothness of
restorative resin materials. J Esthet Dent 1989; 1(5): 169-175.
POSTERIOR CROSSBITES in the mixed or permanent dentition represent deviations from normal bucco-lingual occlusal relationships.
Posterior crossbites can be caused by malpositions of individual or
groups of posterior teeth (dental crossbites), malpositions of posterior
teeth accompanied by a functional shift of the mandible (functional
crossbites), or transverse disharmonies of the maxilla and mandible
(skeletal crossbites). Frequently, posterior crossbite relationships may
be caused by a combination of the aforementioned factors.
Posterior crossbites are frequently observed as lingual crossbites (Figure 1), but may also be found in buccal crossbite relationships (Figure 2).
36 NYSDJ AUGUST/SEPTEMBER 2005
There is a wide range of reported incidences of unilateral posterior crossbite (UPXB) in the primary and mixed dentition. The
incidence of UPXB has ranged from 7% to 23%.1-7 Posterior crossbites have been reported to develop between 19 months and 5 years
of age, with approximately 80% of UPXBs being accompanied by
functional shifts of the mandible.8
The posterior crossbite with functional shift of the mandible
should be differentiated from posterior dental crossbites without
functional shifts. Figure 3 is a posterior dental crossbite caused by
an individual tooth malposition of the maxillary left molar. Note
that the maxillary and mandibular dental midlines coincide. This
type of crossbite can be treated by moving the tooth (or teeth) in
crossbite into normal position.
However, the situation in Figure 4 is quite different. The
observed crossbite relationship in the maximum intercuspation
position appears to be identical to the dental crossbite anomaly. A
closer look, however, reveals a notable disparity between the maxillary and mandibular dental midlines. The mandible has shifted (to
the side of the observed crossbite) as it encountered prematurities
upon closure. If we were to place the mandible in its normal transverse position (lining up the true maxillary and mandibular dental
midlines), we would observe the actual transverse relationship
between the maxillary and mandibular posterior teeth (Figure 5). It
becomes apparent that both the right and left sides of the maxillary
posterior segments are lingually displaced. Consequently, the functional crossbite (even though it resembles the dental posterior
crossbite in the maximum intercuspation position) is a result of a
Figure 3. Posterior
dental crossbite: definite
occlusal stop in position
of maximum intercuspation. Normal buccolingual inclinations of
opposing molars on right
side. Abnormal tipping
on left side. Maxillary
and mandibular dental
midlines coincide.
Figure 4. Posterior
functional crossbite: with
teeth in maximum intercuspation, unilateral
crossbite is seen.
Opposite side appears
to occlude normally.
Mandibular midline is
shifted toward crossbite side.
Figure 8.
Patient R.G.
displays facial
asymmetry as
result of transverse shift of
mandible upon
closure.
Figure 6. Patient R.G. has unilateral posterior crossbite with functional shift
of mandible (to patients left side). Upper and lower dental midlines are
characteristically disparate.
Figure 7. Diagrammatic
depiction of transverse shifting
of mandible associated with
unilateral posterior crossbites.
tional interferences were removed. The patient rejected orthognathic surgery and opted for conventional orthodontic treatment,
which entailed maxillary dental expansion and the use of fixed
orthodontic appliances to improve inter- and intradental relationships. Figure 11 is a post-treatment composite showing significant
inter- and intradental arch corrections. The facial asymmetry has
been reduced as the mandible assumed a more normal transverse
relationship. The remaining asymmetry is due to unchanged bilateral morphological mandibular structural differences that naturally would not be expected to fully correct without the assistance of a
surgical procedure.
Treatment
The treatment of posterior crossbites with functional shifts generally entails use of an orthodontic appliance that is capable of
effecting bilateral expansion of the maxillary dental arch and/or
expansion of the palate via sutural disjunction. The clinician
should assess the level of orthodontic correction that is needed
beyond the mere elimination of the functional shift using the same
criteria that are appropriate for the diagnosis, treatment planning,
choice of appliance(s) and retention requirements of any prospective orthodontic patient.
E.H. is an 8-year-old female with UPXB with functional shift in
the mixed dentition (Figure 12). The right side displays a complete
38 NYSDJ AUGUST/SEPTEMBER 2005
Figure 11. Post-orthodontic treatment composite illustrating dental and facial improvement.
UPXB with functional shift of the mandible is a type of malocclusion that can impair both form and function in growing individuals. Pediatric dentists and other clinicians who choose to treat
children and adolescents should be keenly aware of the diagnostic features of UPXB with functional shifts and recommend orthodontic corrective procedures earlier rather than later. The mixed
dentition is an ideal stage to consider beginning orthodontic
treatment in these types of cases.
The successful resolution of UPXB with functional shift represents a valuable and conservative dental health service for
individual patients with this type of malocclusion.
REFERENCES
1. Kutin G, Hawes RR. Posterior crossbites in the deciduous and mixed dentition. AM J
Orthod 1969;56:491-504.
2. Day AJ, Foster TD. An investigation into the prevalence of molar crossbite and some
associated etiological conditions. Dent Pract. 1971;21:402-10.
3. Infante PF. An epidemiologic study of finger habits in preschool children as related to
malocclusion, socioecononomic status, race, sex, and size of community. J Dent Child
1976;1:33-8.
4. de Vis H, de Boever JA, van Cauwenberge P. Epidemiologic survey of functional conditions of the masticatory system in Belgian children aged 3-6 years. Comm Dent Oral
Epidemiol 1984;12:203-207.
5. Heikinheimo K, Salmi K. Need for orthodontic intervention in five-year-old Finnish
children. Proc Finn Dent Soc 1987;83:165-9.
6. Hannuksela A, Laurin A, Lehmus V, Kouri R. Treatment of crossbite in early mixed dentition. Proc. Finn Dent Soc. 1988;84:175-82.
7. Kurol J, Bergland L. Longitudinal study and cost-benefit analysis of the effect of early
treatment of posterior crossbites in the primary dentition. Eur J Orthod 1992;14:173-9.
8. Thilander B,Wahlund S, Lennartsson B.The effect of early interceptive treatment in children with posterior crossbite. Eur J Orthod 1984;6:25-34.
9. Gottlieb Eugene, Moderator, JCO Roundtable, Early Orthodontic Treatment, Part 2. J
Clinical Orthod March, Volume XXXVIII, Number 3:135-154.
10. Pinto,AS, Buschang, PH, Throckmorton GS, Chen P. Morphological and positional asymmetries of young children with functional unilateral posterior crossbite. Am. J. Orthod.
2001;20:513-520.
11. Sonnesen L, Bakke M, Solow B. Bite force in pre-orthodontic children and unilateral
crossbite Eur. J. Orthod. 2001;23:741-749.
12. Moskowitz E. Orthodontics in the Progressive Dental Practice. In Essential Dental
Handbook. Tulsa, OK: PennWell Corp. 2003:387-430.
TONGUE PIERCING
Risk Factor to Periodontal Health
Jennifer Choe, D.D.S.; Khalid Almas, B.D.S., M.Sc., FRACDS, FDSRCS, FICD; Robert Schoor, D.D.S.
Abstract
Body piercing has grown in popularity among teenagers
and young adults. Dating back to antiquity, piercing is a
cultural practice used in ceremonial or religious rites; however, today, it is commonly exercised as a method of selfexpression. Different complications and side effects are
associated with intraoral piercing, including pain, swelling,
infection, gingival trauma, chipped or fractured teeth,
increased salivary flow, calculus buildup, and interference
with speech and swallowing. We present a case report of
periodontal treatment of traumatized gingival tissue
caused by a tongue stud. The step-by-step periodontal
surgical management of the case has been elaborated.
The role of oral and dental health care professionals in
managing the growing problem of tongue piercing as a
periodontal risk factor has also been highlighted.
40 NYSDJ AUGUST/SEPTEMBER 2005
ALTHOUGH ORAL PIERCING IS POPULAR among certain cultures and in some developing countries, only recently has it gained
partial acceptance in Western society.1-3 Body beautification, decoration and body art are ancient practices that have been exercised
by humans across cultures for centuries. Intentional, irreversible
changes to the human body have been practiced by older, as well as
modern, civilizations for a variety of reasons. The most common of
these are expressing spiritual devotion or dedication to magic, fulfilling social demands, making a personal statement or enhancing
individual sex appeal. A multitude of body beautification procedures were in use by older civilizations and are commonly seen
today, especially in developing countries. Among these are skin tattooing, branding and piercing of ear lobes and the nose.4
Oral body art, as it is referred to, usually involves piercing of the
tongue, cheeks, lips or uvula. The lip is the most commonly pierced
site, but tongue piercing is becoming more prevalent.With the growing number of oral piercings being performed,it is vital that dentists
are aware of the risks, complications and dental implications associated with such procedures.1 This article includes a case report on
tongue piercing, periodontal trauma and its surgical management.
And it presents the topic of oral piercing with special emphasis on
complications and ethical considerations for dental professionals.
Case Report
Surgical Procedure
Figures 6 & 7.
Lingual full thickness
flap reflection from
tooth #25.
Figure 6.
Figure 7.
Figure 8. Palatal
donor site of connective
tissue graft.
Figure 9. Connective
tissue (8 x 5 mm)
placed at defect site.
The patient in this case report represents a situation that will occur
more frequently as the popularity of tongue piercing increases. And
while tongue piercing is gaining in popularity, it does not appear to
be a harmless fad. On the contrary, there is a risk of infection and
edema, which could cause a hazard to the airway.2 Consequently,
warnings have appeared in the popular press. And, according to a
recent report, experts from the Academy of General Dentistry have
warned that implanting jewelry in the tongue may lead to numbness,
loss of taste and mobility, and even a life-threatening blood clot.5
According to a recent report, common complications and
possible adverse consequences of oral piercing can be summarized as follows:1
Oral pain
Edema
Infection
Disease transmission
Airway obstruction secondary to swelling
Prolonged bleeding
Chipped or fractured teeth
Conclusion
Determination of the periodontal treatment for a localized mucosal or gingival defect resulting from disease or trauma in a mouth is
case dependent. Generally, the goals of periodontal treatment are to
restore the function and esthetics of periodontium and long-term
maintenance of teeth and gingival tissues.
The periodontal surgical procedure with connective tissue
graft has predictable outcome in the absence of causal trauma.
Dental professionals should be aware of oral and perioral piercing
and should be able to talk with their patients about these issues and
provide sound advice and comprehensive care for soft and hard tissue damage caused by oral piercing jewelry.
REFERENCES
1 . Farah CS, Harmon DM. Tongue piercing: case report and review of current practice.Aus
Dent J 1998; 43: 387-389.
2. Scully C, Chen M.Tongue piercing (oral body art).Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1994; 32:37-38.
3. Maibaum WW, Margherita VA. Tongue piercing: a concern for the dentist. Gen Dent
1997; 45: 495-497.
4. Bassiouny MA, Deem LP., Deem TE. Tongue piercing: a restorative perspective.
Quintessence Int 2001; 32: 477-481.
5. Jones HE. Are they just skin deep? RDH 1996;16:38-44.
6. American Dental Association. ADA statement on intraoral/perioral piercing. Available
at: http://www.ada.org/prof/resources/positions/statements/piercing.asp. January 2003.
7. Dunn WJ, Reeves TE. Tongue piercing: case report and ethical overview. General
Dentistry May-June 2004; 244-247.
B
Figure 1. Before (A) and computer-simulated after (B) close-up photographs.
Figure 2. A .020-inch vacuum plastic form was made over the stone cast duplicate
of the diagnostic wax-up, then trimmed to the scalloped outline of the gingival zenith
on the teeth.
Facial and close-up digital images of the patient were downloaded to a computer. Simulation of esthetic values of crown width
and height was achieved using a specialized dental imaging software (PracticeWorks/DICOMTM Cosmetic Imaging Software, Version 1.73,
Eastman Kodak, Atlanta, GA). Before and after 8-inch x 11-inch print
outputs were produced using a desktop printer (Kodak Personal Picture
Maker 200 by Lexmark, Eastman Kodak, Co., Rochester, NY) and glossy photographic paper (Kodak Desktop Medical Imaging Paper, Eastman Kodak, Co.,
Rochester, NY). The consultation adjunct output included a personalized before and after facial and close-up digital photograph
(Figure 1).
Diagnostic Wax-up/Surgical Template
B
Figure 3. A) Surgical template is placed over epically positioned flap to confirm
desired gingival margin. B) Surgical tacks are used to stabilize soft tissues.
Figure 4. Intraoral anterior view of maxillary anterior dentition 6 weeks after final
restorations have been delivered.
46 NYSDJ AUGUST/SEPTEMBER 2005
Impressions were made of both arches using stock trays and irreversible hydrocolloid. These were then cast in stone. The casts
were articulated in a semi-adjustable articulator (Hanau H2,
Waterpik Technologies, Fort Collins, CO). Concomitant with the digital
imaging output, using average values of crown width and height,
the gingiva was scalloped on the casts to achieve desired crown
length. A diagnostic wax-up was then completed to visualize the
final outcome. It is important to stress that the extra length was
achieved in a gingival direction almost exclusively, with only 1
mm added to the incisal edge. This is done both for esthetic reasons and to avoid excessive restorative materials from interfering
during function.
The diagnostic wax-up was duplicated and poured in dental
stone. A .020-inch vacuum plastic form was made over this cast,
then trimmed to the scalloped outline of the gingival zenith on the
teeth scheduled to have crown-lengthening surgery (Figure 2). This
vacuum-formed tray was designed to serve as a surgical guide template during the crown-lengthening procedure. Tooth #6 was not
included, as this was part of a fixed partial denture that was not
being replaced.
During the surgical visit, the mucoperiosteal flap was elevated beyond the mucogingival junction, allowing apical displacement of the gingiva. The surgical guide was then placed over the
teeth and used to position the gingival tissues to the apical margin of the planned prosthesis (Figure 3A). Subsidiary surgical
tacks, 5 mm in length, were then driven through the marginal
gingival tissues into the interproximal bone to stabilize the marginal tissue at the desired level as indicated by the surgical guide
(Figure 3B).
After four weeks of tissue maturation, teeth #7-11 were prepared for full coverage porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns. Full arch
Impergum-polyether impressions were taken (3M-ESPE, St. Paul, MN)
REFERENCES
1. Goldstein C, Goldstein RE, Garber DA. Computer imaging: an aid to treatment planning.
J Calif Dent Assoc 1991;19:47-51.
2. Kois JC. Altering gingival levels: the restorative connection, part 1: biologic variables. J
Esthet Dent 1994;6:3-9.
3. Garguilo AW. Dimensions and relationships of the dentogingival junction in humans. J
Periodontol 1961;32:261-7.
4. Ingber JS, Rose LF, Coslet JG. The biologic width- a concept in periodontics and
restorative dentistry. Alpha Omegan 1977;70(3):62-5.
5. Maynard JG, Wilson RD. Physiologic dimensions of the periodontium fundamental to
successful restorative dentistry. J Periodontol 1979;50:107.
6. Nevins M, Skurow HM. The intracrevicular restorative margin, the biologic width, and
the maintenance of the gingival margin. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 1984;4(3):31-49.
7. Kaldahl WB, Becker CM, Wentz FM. Periodontal surgical preparation for specific problems in restorative dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 1984;51(1):36-41.
8. Parma-Benfenati S, Fugazzotto PA, Ruben MP. The effect of restorative margins on the
postsurgical development and nature of the periodontium. Part I. Int J Periodont Rest
Dent 1985;5(6):31.
9. Oakley E, Rhyu IC, Karatzas S, Gandini-Santiago L, Nevins M, Caton J. Formation of the
biologic width following crown lengthening in nonhuman primates. Int J Periodontics
Restorative Dent 1999 Dec;19(6):529-41.
10. Block MS. Preserving alveolar ridge anatomy following tooth removal in conjunction with
delayed implant placement.Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 1999;7(2):61-77.
11. Guided Tissue Regeneration, The Final Mechanical Stabilizer. http://www.imtec.com/
demo/gtr_product.php (last viewed 10/13/04).
12. Grubb JE, Smith T, Sinclair P. Clinical and scientific applications/advances in video
imaging. Angle Orthod 1996; 66: 407-16.
13. Papasotiriou OS, Nathanson D, Goldstein RE. Computer imaging versus conventional
esthetic consultation: a prospective clinical study. J Esthet Dent 2000;12(2):72-7.
14. Almog DM, Sanchez Marin C, Proskin HM, Cohen MJ, Kyrkanides S, Malmstrom H.
Choice for utilization of esthetic services following four different esthetic consultation
methods: pilot study. J Dent Res 2003, Vol. 82, Special Issue A.
15. Herrero F, Scott JB, Maropis PS, Yukna RA. Clinical comparison of desired versus actual
amount of surgical crown lengthening. J Periodontol 1995;66:568-571.
This study was supported by the divisions of Prosthodontics and Periodontics at the University of
Rochester Eastman Dental Center.
Case Report
A
Figure 4. Biopsy specimen showing hyperparakeratosis, exocytosis and microabscesses. Intense
inflammatory infiltrate, basically composed of
plasma cells, is present down into connective
tissue (H & E stain).
Figures 5A and B. Biopsy specimens with special stains (A) anti-kappa light chain and (B) anti-lambda light
chain, demonstrating polyclonal population of plasma cells.
oral care products, nicotine, thermal injury or metals may be chemical or mechanical irritants.7 In the case presented here, the condition resolved completely in approximately three weeks after cessation of using the household cleaning product.
There may have been some mechanical injury to the mucosa
because of the poor-fitting prostheses, but the most exuberant lesion
was found on the upper labial mucosa. Speculation as to the allergen
includes sodium hypochlorite, sodium lauryl sulfate, some coloring
agent or a fragrance. The household cleaner was not analyzed.
Conclusion
services in private dental offices. And the average income of dentists was almost $13,000.(1)2
TRY TO IMAGINE THE SETTING in which hospital dentistry existed when I began my dental education more than 50 years ago.
Dentists (virtually all of whom were white males) stood while using
belt-driven drills that ran about 7,500 rpm. Discs were used to prepare crowns, because the steel burs couldnt cut through enamel.
The dental office staff answered phones and cleaned up between
patients; they seldom worked at chairside. More than 55% of dental
offices had only one full-time auxiliary staff member. (New York
State had the smallest proportion of dentists who used auxiliaries;
it was somehow related to the fact that the average age of New York
dentists was the highest in the nation.) Gloves were used only during surgical procedures. Third party insurance schemes were
extremely limited. Medicaid was off somewhere in the distant
future. Dental care in hospitals often was a sporadic reality in many
facilities. All too often, hospital dental care consisted of emergency
and surgical care for the poor, who were unable to secure needed
52 NYSDJ AUGUST/SEPTEMBER 2005
Unless otherwise stated, all material on the history of hospital dentistry was
drawn from the publication, Survey of Dentistry2
The median number of dentists (including both house and attending staff)
in hospitals with a dental staff was: 2 dentists in governmental (nonfederal)
hospitals; 6 dentists in federal hospitals; 9 dentists in voluntary hospitals; 3
dentists in proprietary hospitals.2
dents enrolled in the 208 GPR programs. There were 898 graduates
from the 30 dental school-sponsored GPR and 178 hospitalsponsored GPR programs.5
Since 1987, hospitals have been allowed to receive GME funding for resident training in non-hospital settings. The Centers for
Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) (previously named the
Health Care Financing Administration) worked with dental schools,
hospitals and others to facilitate the creation of dental residency
programs in non-hospital settings that would qualify for GME
funds. However, in 2003, CMS took the position that GME funding
for dental residencies in non-hospital settings, which it had sanctioned and supported since 1997, was no longer appropriate.
Funding for these programs continued only for those residents who
had commenced their postdoctoral training prior to the ruling.6 As
a result, at many dental schools, efforts are being made to transfer
AEGD-sponsored programs to GPR arrangements and formats.
Types of Dental Services
In January 2003, New York State initiated a new era in dental licensure. Dental school graduates who satisfactorily complete in its
entirety an accredited residency program of at least one years
duration may use that experience in lieu of Part III of the dental
licensing examination in order to obtain a dental license.15
The ability to substitute a residency program for the oneshot (Northeast Regional Board-NERB) examination15 not only
eliminates much of the controversy associated with the NERB
examination, but recognizes the value of GPR and other residency
programs as a critical step in the progressive training of dental
practitioners. (Note: As of January 2007, all applicants for initial
licensure in New York State will have to complete a CODA-approved
residency of at least one years duration.)
REFERENCES
1. Man and mouth. Editorial. Hospitals Jan. 16, 1960;34(2):37.
2. Hollinshead BS. Commission on the Survey of Dentistry in the United States. The Survey
of Dentistry. Washington, DC: American Council on Education, 1961.
3. Handelman SL, Meyerowitz C, Solomon E, et al. The growth of postdoctoral general dentistry programs. Spec Care Dent 1995;15(1):5-10.
4. Lefever KH, Atchison KA, Mito RS, et al. Curriculum emphasis and resident preparation
in postgraduate general dentistry programs. J Dent Edu 2002;66(6):747-756.
5. Survey Center. 2001/02 Survey of Advanced Dental Education. Chicago: American
Dental Association, 2003.
6. American Student Dental Association. Current Issues. Web site: sightmaker.umich.edu/
asda/current_asda_issues Accessed March 12, 2004.
7. Norwalk Hospital, CT. Web site: www.Norwalkhosp.org Accessed March 12, 2004.
8. Atchison KA, Bachand W, Buchanan CR, et al. Military and VA general dentistry training: a national resource. J Dent Edu 2002; 66(6):739-746.
9. Atchison KA, Cheffetz SE. Critical issues for dentistry: PGD program directors respond.
J Dent Edu 2002; 66(6):730-738.
10. Mito RS, Atchison KA, Lefever KH, et al. Characteristics of civilian postdoctoral general
dentistry programs. J Dent Edu 2002; 66(6):757-765.
11. Tejani A, Epstein JB, Gibson G, et al. A survey assessing the impact of a hospital-based
general practice residency program on dentists and dental practice. Spec Care Dent
2002; 22(1):16-22.
12. Atchison KA, Bibb CA, Lefever KH, et al. Gender difference in career and practice patterns of PGD-trained dentists. J Dent Edu 2002; 66(12):1358-1367.
13. Atchison KA, Mito RS, Rosenberg DJ, et al. PGD training and its impact on general dentist practice patterns. J Dent Edu 2002; 66(12):1348-1357.
14. Handelman S, Meyerowitz C, Iranpour B, et al. Evaluation of advanced general dentistry
education. Spec Care Dent 1993; 13(4 Suppl):177-185.
15. New York State Dental Association. NYSDA-initiated PGY1 legislation becomes law. July
30, 2002. Web site: www.nysdental.org Accessed March 12, 2004.
Most dentists still practice (often with male and female partners
and associates) within the four walls of their offices (albeit the
office settings have changed dramatically, and practitioners now
sit). During these past decades, thousands of dental school graduates continued their training in a hospital environment and now
serve in our communitiesbetter prepared and capable of dealing in their private office or hospital setting with patients with
complex medical conditions, which increasingly are a reality in
many practices.
It must be noted that there have been declines in the number
of applicants to postgraduate general dentistry programs in the
last number of years.5,9 Preference for private practice and high
educational debts are suggested explanations. Based upon the
perceived limitations in the performance of incoming GPR residents, questions have been raised regarding the abilities of recent
graduates who without additional training enter private dental
practice arrangements.9
Whatever the future may hold for changes in the delivery of oral
health services to an increasingly diverse population in our communities, hospital and GPR programs have been and will continue to be
a critical step in eliminating our professional insularity.
NYSDJ AUGUST/SEPTEMBER 2005 55