Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 of 4
The Dog
by Otto Weininger
translated from the German by Kevin Solway & Martin Dudaniec
(based on a translation by S.A.M. Burns)
Copyright Kevin Solway & Martin Dudaniec, 1999
2 of 4
3 of 4
The loyalty of dogs which is so praised, and which allows many to consider the dog a
moral animal, can rightfully be taken only as a symbol of baseness: the slave mentality (there
is no merit in coming back after a beating).
It is interesting whom the dog barks at; it is generally good people whom he barks at,
not base, dog-like characters. I have observed of myself that the less psychic similarity I had
with dogs the more they barked at me. The only curious thing is that it is precisely the
criminal that the watchdog is called upon to guard against.
Rabies is a very interesting phenomenon, perhaps related to epilepsy, in which
humans likewise foam at the mouth. Both are promoted by heat.
If the dog does not wag his tail, but holds it stiff and straight, then there is danger that
he will bite: that is the criminal act. Everything else, the barking also, is only the sign of an
evil nature.
Dogs among characters in literature are "old Ekdal" in Ibsen's The Wild Duck, and the
greatest, Minutte in Knut Hamsun's novel "Mysteries". Many of the so-called "Old Masters"
depict the dog type among human criminals.
That there are yet other criminals is demonstrated by the snake, the pig.
The sniffing of the dog is also very significant. Here indeed lies the incapacity for
apperception. Just like the dog's, the criminal's attention is drawn completely passively to
individual things, without him knowing why he draws near them or comes home to them: he
simply has no freedom left.
That he has altogether foregone choice also finds expression in the randomness of the
dog's breeding with any bitch whatsoever. This indiscriminate mixing is above all eminently
plebeian, and the dog is the plebeian criminal, the slave.
I repeat again: it is blindness to consider the dog an ethical symbol; even R. Wagner
was supposed to have loved a dog (on this point Goethe seems to have looked more deeply).
Darwin explains the dog's tail-wagging as "the diverting of excitement" ("expression of
emotion"). It is of course the expression of the most rank baseness, the most servile devotion,
which is resigned to every kick and only begs for more of everything.
4 of 4