Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Code of 1991, formed the Katipunan ng Kabataan (KK) to tap and harness the energy,
enthusiasm, and idealism of young people. Those aged 15 to 17 years old in a barangay
could register in the KK and have the right to vote and be voted into a governing body
called the Sangguniang Kabataan (SK). The SK chairperson assumes a seat in the
Barangay Council, and is given full powers and authority like any member of the
Council. The idea is truly ahead of its time: a pioneering effort that sets the Philippines
apart. The law sets the stage for the youth to acquire leadership skills by actually
becoming leaders: learn how to speak and be heard in the world of adults, and be
empowered to create programs and policies that will help solve societys problems.
(Balanon, et. al., 2007)
Since independence, however, the Philippines has enjoyed remarkable cultural cohesion
within its political elite. The Muslim or Protestant segments in a dominantly Catholic
society have fitted in well on all except the most ecclesiastical occasions. Families of
Chinese origin frequently intermarried with Filipinos and were rapidly assimilated to
national society. Tagalogs, Ilocanos, and Visayans were balanced by an unwritten rule
which distributed presidential, vice presidential and senatorial nominations among the
major tongues. Nor did these linguistic differences represent significant cultural
cleavages and in any case the language of all government transactions, until recently,
was English.
Furthermore, old families of great wealth without losing their own disproportionate
influence welcomed or even sponsored poor boys with talent into the elite circle, so
that differences in social origin did not become the basis for lasting elite cleavages either.
Despite the contrasts in wealth, there were no impermeable class barriers. Differences in
economic interest within the elite have been more open causes of controversy in the
Philippines than elsewhere in Southeast Asia, however. This was permitted because of the
very cultural unity we have described. Thus examination of socio-economic backgrounds
becomes more important for Philippine elite analysis than for that in most Southeast
Asian countries.
Filipino elite cohesion helped produce a period of political stability for twenty-six years
after independence, consistent with the expectations of the conventional political science
wisdom. That stability was nevertheless disrupted in 1972 by the intensity of
interfactional struggle, despite that cohesion. It is our primary purpose here to review the
changes that have taken place in the Filipino political elite in recent years and to assess
the implications that they hold for the future, both for the Philippines and for developing
countries generally. (Wurfel, 1979)
Foreign Studies
The UN Millennium Project (2005) emphasized that to be empowered women, they must
not only have equal capabilities (such as education and health) and equal access to
resources and opportunities (such as land and employment), but they must also have the
agency to use those rights, capabilities, resources, and opportunities to make strategic
choices and decisions (such as is provided through leadership opportunities and
participation in political institutions). And for them to exercise agency, they must live
without the fear of coercion and violence.
In a UN Habitat (2008) publication on Best Practices in Gender Mainstreaming, it
highlights that women empowerment involves practical measures to enhance womens
participation in decision-making and in governance processes, and generally to uplift
their status through literacy, education, training and raising awareness. It also includes
poverty reduction programmes which lead them to generate income and enhance access
to job opportunities; underlying issues are also taken into account such as the protection
of a womans human rights, her reproductive health as well as property ownership.
(Alvarez,2013)
Class voting is a much disputed scientific debate nowadays. But it is not only the party
preference that might differ with social class, but also the propensity to vote itself. As
from an economic perspective voting can be understood as an act that is connected with
costs (time and information costs), persons might have different motivations to
participate in a vote. In addition, as the individualisation of society accelerates, social
pressure to vote diminishes and especially individuals from a lower socio-economic
background are left behind with a feeling of frustration towards party politics.
Disoriented and disappointed citizens, if not offered any alternative by parties that claim
to act in their interest might choose to use vote abstention as a sign of disapproval
towards the political system that they feel more and more alienated from.
Furthermore, while not being a sign of active disagreement, abstention can also express
general disinterest in politics.
(Franke, 2012)
Ethnic and religious minority groups across Europe are often excluded from political
participation by formal as well as informal barriers, despite the fact that participation in
political processes is a fundamental human right and a crucial requirement for
integration. Political participation is essential to functioning democratic systems; it is
important that everyone plays an active role as voters, community participants, workers,
activists and political party members. However, ethnic and religious minorities are unable
to exercise their political and civil rights.
Finally, while two aforementioned approaches tend to underline the political context and
organizational factors in affecting migrants political participation, research also shows
that the socio-demographic and socio-economic characteristics of individuals, their
education, income, gender and age tend to be important factors as well. This holds true
for immigrants and ethnic minorities too. Consequently, where policies tend to encourage
the participation of immigrants in specific sectors of the labour market producing an
ethnic segmentation of the labour market structure, this may be not only an impediment
to immigrants socio-economic integration but it may also have negative effects on the
political integration of immigrants and the possibility of representing their interests and
identities in the political sphere. (Onyeji, 2010)