Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Page 1 of 3
Greg Austin recently wrote in The Diplomat that Vietnam occupied 24 features in the
South China Sea in 1996 and has increased [this number] from 30 to 48 in the last six
years as if these figures were facts. I doubt there is any plausibility to his claim. It
would be more accurate to point out that Vietnam occupied most of these features in
the 1970s after reunification. Whether Vietnam has doubled the number of its features
since then is highly unlikely.
In a paper just presented to the 66th Current Strategy Forum at the U.S. Naval War
College in Newport, Rhode Island, I wrote, U.S. officials also claimed that Vietnam
occupied forty-eight features in the South China Sea. When Secretary of Defense Ash
Carter visited Hanoi this June he called on Vietnam to permanently halt all land
reclamation activities on these features. His Vietnamese counterpart, Minister of
National Defense General Phung Quang Thanh, argued that land reclamation was
being undertaken to prevent soil erosion. General Thanh also argued that Vietnam
stationed military personnel on nine floating islands and twelve submerged islands
or a total of 21 features.
I attached the following footnote to my paper, Floating islands refers to features that
are above the water or which can be built from submerged islands by adding steel
structures, soil, rocks and concrete. Submerged islands are reefs that are underwater.
The United States should have published a list of all 48 features that it claimed Vietnam
was occupying. Also, the U.S. should have provided specific details about the extent and
purpose of Vietnams land reclamation. According to information received, the U.S.
figure may include separate structures on the same reef. I would caution about jumping
to conclusions before the facts are in. Vietnams so-called land reclamation represents
1.9% of the total area of Chinas newly constructed artificial islands. Vietnam does not
have dredging machines like China, it brings in soil from the mainland.
The litmus test for construction activities in the Spratlys is whether or not they violate
the letter and spirit of the 2002 Declaration on Conduct of Parties in the South China
Sea (DOC). The DOC calls on all parties to exercise self-restraint in the conduct of
http://thediplomat.com/2015/06/who-is-the-biggest-aggressor-in-the-south-china-sea-...
23/06/2015
Who Is the Biggest Aggressor in the South China Sea? (A Rejoinder) | The Diplomat
Page 2 of 3
http://thediplomat.com/2015/06/who-is-the-biggest-aggressor-in-the-south-china-sea-...
23/06/2015
Who Is the Biggest Aggressor in the South China Sea? (A Rejoinder) | The Diplomat
Page 3 of 3
map of the South China Sea. China also has employed electronic jamming to interfere
with the lawful operations of an Indonesian maritime law enforcement vessel that had
apprehended Chinese fishermen caught poaching in Indonesias Exclusive Economic
Zone.
Chinas past track record in invading and seizing the Crescent group in the Parcels
island in January 1974 from the Republic of Vietnam, and its March 1988 armed
seizure of Johnson South and other nearby reefs from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam
stand in contrast to the behavior of all other claimants.
China has now constructed a 3,110-meter runway on Fiery Cross Reef that is capable of
handling all types of military aircraft in Chinas inventory. In the future China will be
able to station up to thirty combat aircraft and a squadron of combat ships at Fiery
Cross Reef.
The South China Sea will get more contested in the military domain as China develops
its naval base on Hainan island and completes construction of forward operating bases
on artificially constructed islands in the South China Sea. What more needs to be
said?
http://thediplomat.com/2015/06/who-is-the-biggest-aggressor-in-the-south-china-sea-...
23/06/2015