You are on page 1of 3

Who Is the Biggest Aggressor in the South China Sea?

(A Rejoinder) | The Diplomat

Page 1 of 3

Who Is the Biggest


Aggressor in the South
China Sea? (A Rejoinder)
Chinas track record in the South
China Sea is markedly different
from those of the other claimants.
By Carl Thayer
June 21, 2015

Image Credit: Wikimedia Commons

Greg Austin recently wrote in The Diplomat that Vietnam occupied 24 features in the
South China Sea in 1996 and has increased [this number] from 30 to 48 in the last six
years as if these figures were facts. I doubt there is any plausibility to his claim. It
would be more accurate to point out that Vietnam occupied most of these features in
the 1970s after reunification. Whether Vietnam has doubled the number of its features
since then is highly unlikely.
In a paper just presented to the 66th Current Strategy Forum at the U.S. Naval War
College in Newport, Rhode Island, I wrote, U.S. officials also claimed that Vietnam
occupied forty-eight features in the South China Sea. When Secretary of Defense Ash
Carter visited Hanoi this June he called on Vietnam to permanently halt all land
reclamation activities on these features. His Vietnamese counterpart, Minister of
National Defense General Phung Quang Thanh, argued that land reclamation was
being undertaken to prevent soil erosion. General Thanh also argued that Vietnam
stationed military personnel on nine floating islands and twelve submerged islands
or a total of 21 features.
I attached the following footnote to my paper, Floating islands refers to features that
are above the water or which can be built from submerged islands by adding steel
structures, soil, rocks and concrete. Submerged islands are reefs that are underwater.
The United States should have published a list of all 48 features that it claimed Vietnam
was occupying. Also, the U.S. should have provided specific details about the extent and
purpose of Vietnams land reclamation. According to information received, the U.S.
figure may include separate structures on the same reef. I would caution about jumping
to conclusions before the facts are in. Vietnams so-called land reclamation represents
1.9% of the total area of Chinas newly constructed artificial islands. Vietnam does not
have dredging machines like China, it brings in soil from the mainland.
The litmus test for construction activities in the Spratlys is whether or not they violate
the letter and spirit of the 2002 Declaration on Conduct of Parties in the South China
Sea (DOC). The DOC calls on all parties to exercise self-restraint in the conduct of

http://thediplomat.com/2015/06/who-is-the-biggest-aggressor-in-the-south-china-sea-...

23/06/2015

Who Is the Biggest Aggressor in the South China Sea? (A Rejoinder) | The Diplomat

Page 2 of 3

activities that would complicate or escalate disputes. It is implausible to suggest that


Vietnam is to use Austins emotive language the aggressor on the basis of
evidence presently available or to conjure up a threat from the tiny specks of features
that Vietnam occupies. China on the other hand placed self-propelled artillery on one
of its features that is capable of shelling nearby Vietnamese-occupied features.
Has China shown great restraint?
In a paper presented in 2012, I wrote: China consolidated its military presence in the
South China Sea by construction on several of the features it occupied. China seized
Mischief Reef in 1995 and built its first structures in the South China Sea. These were
expanded in October 1998 with the addition of three octagon-shaped wooden
structures and two two-story concrete towers one at each end. The towers bristle with
SATCOMM and HF antennae for communications. The towers are thought to house
ELINT (electronic intelligence facilities) and radars. The facilities on Mischief Reef
have since been upgraded with the construction of two new piers, a helicopter pad, a
navy navigation radar, several anti-aircraft guns and an anti-ship cruise missile system
(either the HY-2 or C-801).
A 200-foot long concrete building was constructed on Fiery Cross Reef. It houses a
naval High Frequency (HF) yagi radar antenna (Bean Sticks), two Electronic Counter
Measures (ECM) radomes, and several whip communication and mast antennas. The
various antenna support different requirements, such as radio signal surveillance and
Long Range (LR) communications. The facilities on Fiery Cross Reef also include
satellite communication (SATCOMM) and meteorological dishes.
Chinese facilities on Johnson South Reef include four octagon-shaped huts and a
rectangular two story building on a concrete base supporting two towers. One
SATCOMM and three masthead antennas are mounted on the roof. Chigua Reef
contains an identical building structure plus a wooden barracks. Subi Reef hosts a
wooden barracks, a two story building with a SATCOMM antenna and a helicopter
landing pad.
In summary, Chinese facilities in the South China Sea will give the PLAN an enhanced
capability to exercise its sovereignty claims over this area. According to naval analysts,
Although small in size, if necessary these facilities could support future Chinese
expansion throughout the area, and could perhaps even support a limited naval conflict
in this congested region.
This year China repeatedly ordered Philippine military aircraft flying over the South
China Sea (as well as a U.S. Navy Poseidon 8) to leave a military security area or a
military alert zone based on electronic and radar facilities on Fiery Cross.
China has removed Malaysian territorial markers from Luconia and Erica reefs and
replaced them with Chinese markers. China currently stations a Coast Guard ship at
James Shoal in Malaysias Exclusive Economic Zone so as to assert sovereignty over a
feature that is twenty-two metres under water.
The basis for Chinas claim to sovereignty rests on a cartographic slight of hand. China
renamed James Shoal to sandbank when it modified the Nationalist governments 1947

http://thediplomat.com/2015/06/who-is-the-biggest-aggressor-in-the-south-china-sea-...

23/06/2015

Who Is the Biggest Aggressor in the South China Sea? (A Rejoinder) | The Diplomat

Page 3 of 3

map of the South China Sea. China also has employed electronic jamming to interfere
with the lawful operations of an Indonesian maritime law enforcement vessel that had
apprehended Chinese fishermen caught poaching in Indonesias Exclusive Economic
Zone.
Chinas past track record in invading and seizing the Crescent group in the Parcels
island in January 1974 from the Republic of Vietnam, and its March 1988 armed
seizure of Johnson South and other nearby reefs from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam
stand in contrast to the behavior of all other claimants.
China has now constructed a 3,110-meter runway on Fiery Cross Reef that is capable of
handling all types of military aircraft in Chinas inventory. In the future China will be
able to station up to thirty combat aircraft and a squadron of combat ships at Fiery
Cross Reef.
The South China Sea will get more contested in the military domain as China develops
its naval base on Hainan island and completes construction of forward operating bases
on artificially constructed islands in the South China Sea. What more needs to be
said?

http://thediplomat.com/2015/06/who-is-the-biggest-aggressor-in-the-south-china-sea-...

23/06/2015

You might also like