Professional Documents
Culture Documents
3, SEPTEMBER, 2013
1. INTRODUCTION
2.
FLOATING
STORAGE
AND
REGASIFICATION UNIT PARTICULARS
The FSRU will be permanently moored
approximately 600m from port side and crew facilities.
FSRU functional requirements are:
Gas send out rates:
Nominal
400MMscf/d (~LNG:
790m3/h or ~3.1MMtons/yr)
Peak
480MMscf/d (~LNG:
940m3/h
or
~3.8MMtons/yr)
Minimum
100MMscf/d (~LNG:
200m3/h
or
~0.8MMtons/yr)
Gas send out pressure:
Maximum-66
Minimum-30
barg
barg
Nominal -60
barg
Nitrogen Gens
LNG Loading Arms
Air syst upgrade
LV switchboard
HV/LV Transformer
Vent Mast
Vent K.O. Drum
Suction Drum
MSO Compressor
Regasification trains
Metering
HIPPS
Diesel driven
Firepump
3 off SW pumps
SW discharge
HV switchboard
3. CONVERSION OVERVIEW
FSRU description:
2. Mooring dolphins
3. Truck Loading platform
4. Pipeline for LNG
5. Pipeline for natural Gas
The LNG Carriers that supply the LNG will moor
alongside the jetty and within 20 hours will fully unload a
charging up to 125.000 cm of LNG. The FSRU will be
moored permanently to the jetty through the mooring
dolphins for its useful life (up to 30 years). The pipeline
for LNG will be build from the FSRU to the truck loading
platform onshore. The pipeline for natural gas will be
built up to the connection to the national gas
network(Figure 3).
4. REGASIFICATIONPROCESS OVERVIEW
The regasification equipment is arranged in parallel trains,
assembled as separate modules, or the whole plant can be
built in one module to fit to the available space. Each train
consists of one or two LNG booster pumps and one shell
and tube heat exchanger.
The booster pumps are fed by a common LNG buffer
tank. The regasification system can be designed for open
or closed loop operation, and the heating medium for
LNG vaporization can either be sea water or steam. The
system can be designed to match any requirements to
flow and pressure. The regasification diagram is presented
in Figure 5.
5. OPERATIONS ASPECTS
1.
2.
Value
(roni)
Project
875,000.00
3816,850.00
preparationFesiability
study and
technical
details
FSRU
132,000,000.00 575,678,400.00
3.
Marine
25,000,000.00 109,030,000.00
facilities:
mooring
facilitiesmooring
dolphins,
jetty etc-,
Jetty
and
terminal
access from
land; trucks
loading
platform
4.
Pipe
10,000,000.00
network:
LNG and
natural gas,
other
necessary
pipelines
43,612,000.00
5.
LNG
transport
barge
34,889,600.00
TOTAL
8,000,000.00
175,875,000.00767,026,050.00
5. CONCLUSION
This project is of European importance and helps develop
not only one but many other countries because:
- LNG is a much cleaner form of fuel that can power
industries, transports and also can be converted into
natural gas for domestic consumption
- LNG is less expensive than conventional fuels, half the
price of diesel
- Central and eastern Europe does not have acces to LNG
import, or has limited access to very expensive LNG due
to a long chain of intermediaries and limited transport
capacities that hold back the possibility of developing this
industry
- By building an LNG Terminal in Constanta, Romania,
LNG can be delivered upstream Danube to Linz or even
Nuremberg. Constanta is the door for large scale imports
(from the sea) to Central Europe
- By using LNG instead of traditional fuels economies of
scale can be created from a micro persepctive (lower
utilities invoices) to a macro scale perspective
(environmental qulity improvement and lower operation
prices in industries and transports).
LNG is cleaner energy
REFERENCES
[1]. Lindemark, T., Kamsvg, F., Vlasgrd, S.- Fatigue analysis
of gas carriers, Maritime Technical Consultancy Det Norkse
Veritas AS
[2]. Panaitescu, F.V., Panaitescu, M.-Ship machineries and
plants, EXPONTO edition, Constanta, Romania, 2009
[3]. Stopford, M., Maritime Economics (2009), 3rd edition.
Oxon: Routledge
[4]. SIGTTO, OCIMF, ICS and IMO publications:IGC code,
SOLAS, Tanker safety guide, ISGOTT(5th Edition)
[5]. M. Zalar, S. Malenica & L. Diebold, Selced hydrodynamic
issues in design of large LNG carriers,Bureau Veritas
[6]. J. WANG, A study on Technical Development on LNG
Vessel, IEEE Conference in Systems, 2009
[7]. *** Liquefied Gas Carrier, DNV Part 5 Chapter 5, January
2012
[8]. ***http/www.mossww.com, Moss Landing Marine
Laboratories . Retrieved December 4, 2010.
[9]. ***http://www.mossww.com -MOSS MARITIME general
brochure
[10]. *** http://www.mossww.com, Floating offshore LNG
terminal, pdf, pp 4-6, GOLAR FREEZE FSRU PROJECT
MOSS MARITIME brochure
[11]. EN 1473:1997-Interfata nava-Uscat -1532/1997 Instalatii si
echipamente pentru Gaze Naturale Lichefiate. Proiectarea
instalatiilor on shore
[12]. *** EN 1462:2003-Proiectarea si constructia tancurilor de
marfa pentru stocarea gazelor refrigerate cu temperatura de
operare intre -1650 C si -50 C.
[13]. ***http://www.isgintt.org/files/Chapter_33en_isgintt_0620
10.pdf , International Safety Guide for Inland Navigation
Tank-barges and Terminals, chapter 33
[14]. ***http://www.onlineconversion.com/flow_rate_volume.ht
ml
[15]. *** http://control.com/thread/1026228632
[16]. ***LNG Import Terminal in Constanta, Project, RomAir,
Bucharest, 2013
[17]. ***http://www.shipbuilding.or.kr/Press/200906/Emerson/E
merson.html
[18]. ***http://www.aukevisser.nl
[19]. ***http://www.bamclough.com/projects/show/pluto-lngjetty/
[20]. ***http://hhpinsight.com/marine/2012/10/wallers-atb-getsabs-blessing/attachment/wallermarineatb/
[21]. ***http://www.polarenergy.net
[22]. ***http://www.theoildrum.com/uploads/44/lng_historical_
context.jpg