Preserving Our Environment

Many people assume that the environment is in no danger. They believe that with advancing technology, we don't need to worry
about renewing natural resources, recycling, and finding new ways to produce energy. They argue that one person in the world
does not make a large difference. In actuality, each individual's contribution greatly affects our environment. Our natural
resources are running low, and we must work together to save them and the Earth from ruin.
Recycling is so important in the effort to preserve our environment for future generations. We are running out of places to
put landfills. My neighbor, Nick, believes that the U.S. has enough land for our own waste, and we should not concern ourselves
with the rest of the world. However, saving the environment is a team effort. Everyone in the world must participate and work
together in order for it to be successful. While some have argued that one person does not make a large difference, the fact is
they do. Last year I lived with five other girls.
Preservar nuestro medio ambiente
Mucha gente asume que el entorno no est en peligro. Ellos creen que con la tecnologa avanza, no tiene que preocuparse sobre
la renovacin de los recursos naturales, el reciclaje, y la bsqueda de nuevas formas de producir energa. Ellos argumentan que
una persona en el mundo no hace una gran diferencia. En la actualidad, la contribucin de cada individuo afecta en gran medida
nuestro medio ambiente. Nuestros recursos naturales se estn agotando, y tenemos que trabajar juntos para salvar a la Tierra y
de la ruina.
El reciclaje es tan importante en el esfuerzo por preservar nuestro medio ambiente para las generaciones futuras. Nos
estamos quedando sin lugares para rellenos sanitarios. Mi vecino, Nick, cree que los EE.UU. tienen suficiente tierra para
nuestros propios residuos, y no debemos preocuparnos por el resto del mundo. Sin embargo, salvar el medio ambiente es un
esfuerzo de equipo. Todo el mundo debe participar y trabajar juntos a fin de que sea un xito. Mientras que algunos han
argumentado que una persona no hace una gran diferencia, el hecho es que lo hacen. El ao pasado viv con otras cinco nias.
Recycling is the method of using waste materials and reusing it to produce new products. The advantages of recycling are less
interruption of nature, less waste in the environment, and less pollution in the area. The disadvantage of recycling are that the
materials has lower quality then the original materials, it could cost more to recycle, and it require more work. Recycling our waste
products can improve our world into a more cleaner and stable place. When recycling, it doesnt only help our environment, it is
also a cheap way to buy new products. People should recycle to reduce environmental problems which may include the
contamination of communities and nature.
Recycling is a process, it has three major routines to it: reduce, reuse, and recycle. Reducing is when you minimize the usage of
resources and energy. It is when you use fewer materials and less waste are produced. Reuse is to use an object or material
more than once by using old products and processing it into something new. Reusing can help us save resources, money, and
energy, while recycling is the action of
El reciclaje es el mtodo de utilizacin de materiales de desecho y de reutilizacin para producir nuevos productos. Las ventajas
del reciclaje son menos interrupciones de la naturaleza, menos residuos en el medio ambiente, y disminuir la contaminacin en la
zona. La desventaja de reciclado son los materiales que tiene menor calidad, entonces los materiales originales, podra costar
ms de reciclar, y que requieren ms trabajo. Reciclaje de residuos nuestros productos pueden mejorar nuestro mundo en un
limpiador ms y lugar estable. Cuando el reciclaje, no slo ayudan a nuestro medio ambiente, tambin es una forma barata de
comprar nuevos productos. Las personas deben reciclar para reducir los problemas medioambientales que pueden incluir la
contaminacin de las comunidades y la naturaleza.
El reciclaje es un proceso, tiene tres rutinas de capital: reducir, reutilizar y reciclar. La reduccin es cuando minimiza el consumo
de recursos y energa. Es cuando se utiliza menos material y menos residuos se producen. Reutilizar es usar un objeto o ms
caractersticas esenciales de una vez mediante el uso de aparatos viejos y transformndolo en algo nuevo. La reutilizacin
puede ayudarnos a ahorrar recursos, dinero y energa, mientras que el reciclaje es la accin de
Ozone Depletion and the Environment
There is overwhelming scientific evidence that man-made chemicals are destroying the ozone layer -- Nobel prizes have
already been awarded for the research. Rush Limbaugh argues that humans are safe, because volcanic chlorine has been
working on the ozone layer longer than man-made chlorine, and yet we're still here. But this argument is false. Volcanic chlorine is
water soluble, and rained harmlessly out of the atmosphere. Human CFCs are insoluble, and can therefore rise to the ozone layer
where they can do their damage.
Do man-made chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) destroy the ozone layer? There are no longer any skeptics left at NASA, the National
Academy of Sciences, the National Center for Atmospheric Research, or the World Meteorological Organization. In fact, the three
scientists who first sounded the alarm in the early 80s -- F. Sherwood Rowland, Paul Crutzen and Mario Molina -- received the
1995 Nobel Prize in chemistry for their work.
Agotamiento del ozono y Medio Ambiente
Existen pruebas cientficas contundentes de que las sustancias qumicas fabricadas por el hombre estn destruyendo la capa
de ozono - los premios Nobel se haya concedido para la investigacin. Rush Limbaugh dice que los seres humanos son seguros,

porque el cloro volcnica ha estado trabajando en la capa de ozono ya que el cloro por el hombre, y sin embargo todava
estamos aqu. Pero este argumento es falso. Volcnica de cloro es soluble en agua, y llovi sin causar dao fuera de la
atmsfera. CFC Humanos son insolubles, por lo que puede llegar hasta la capa de ozono en el que puedan causar daos
No por el hombre clorofluorocarbonos (CFC) destruyen la capa de ozono? Ya no hay ningn escpticos a la izquierda en la
NASA, la Academia Nacional de Ciencias, el Centro Nacional de Investigacin Atmosfrica, y la Organizacin Meteorolgica
Mundial. De hecho, los tres cientficos que la voz de alarma a principios de los aos 80 - F. Sherwood Rowland, Paul Crutzen y
Mario Molina - ha recibido el Premio Nobel 1995 de Qumica por su trabajo.
The Environment and Big Business
Since the rise of environmental awareness, business and industry have always considered environmentalism a waste of time,
only getting in the way of profits and production. From the perspective of business, environmentalists push for regulations and
restrictions on businesses which cost them more money and frequently restrict some of their practices. What business an the
economy doesn't know is that they can actually save money by being environmentally responsible, while protecting the very
resources they depend on . The protection of the environment not only has intrinsic value, but also economical value. Business
and industry, can also benefit. These factors can lead to a newly developed economy that protects what it needs instead of
destroying it. Despite historical differences between advocates of business and the environment, the fact is the two can and must
utilize eachother for the future success of both.
It is important, in order for the economy to see the environment worth something, to put an economic value on it. For this reason,
a group of scientists for the Center for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment have developed an economic
valuation for the environment. According to them, it is necessary to impute a value to environmental goods or services (Pearce et
al, online). This value is necessary because the economy needs to see that the protection of the environment can prove cost
worthy to business and industry. The purpose of valuation is to show true costs of using up scarce environmental resources. It is a
way for environmentalists and economists to put a dollar figure on the services the environment provides. Robert Costanza, an
ecological economist from the University of Maryland, has done just this. The estimate of services provided by ecosystems
worldwide is 33 trillion dollars annually, surpassing the gross national product of al the countries on earth combined by eight trillion
dollars (Zimmer 105). The environment provides services not only commercially, such as timber, but also in less visible ways. For
instance, forests protect from soil erosion, which proves costly to correct. With these facts in mind, depleting ecosystems an
resources proves costly, while protection them can only save money.
Business and the American economy has much to gain by altering their current practices. One prime example of how protection
the environment can prove beneficial to a company is a program created by 3M called Pollution Prevention Pays. This program
creates incentives to prevent hazardous and toxic wastes by changing processes, redesigning equipment, and recovering waste
for reuse or recycling. Since the program was designed in 1975, 3M has been able to save over $537 million, while reducing its
air pollution by 10,000 tons, its wastewater by one billion gallons and its solid waste by 410,000 tons (Hawken 61). This is one
example of a business making money fro preventative waste, while becoming environmentally responsible. While at the same
time, not being environmentally responsible can cause businesses to lose money. The cost of cleaning up waste can be extremely
expensive, while reducing waste and recycling can prove worthwhile. From a surface view, it would appear that the American
economy doesn't need to make any change to its current practices. After all, the U.S. is one of the wealthiest nations in the world.
The problem rests in the foundation of the economy. America was founded on and flourishes because of its natural resources,
most of them non-renewable. These resources, such as petroleum, natural gas an timber, will run out someday, it is inevitable.
Research of programs to prevent this or to incorporate alternate forms of energy have barely been researched. Perhaps the
reason for this is that actions that deplete lands an species are rewarded in the market, because they are less expensive, while
actions that preserve them are not (Schuss and Western 329). It is much less expensive, for instance, to buy a car that is fueled
by gasoline than to buy a car that runs on hydrogen, even though hydrogen is a renewable resource an produces barely any
waste.
As Paul Hawken, an environmentalist and author of "Ecology of Commerce", explains, "the single most damaging aspect of the

present economic system is that the expense of destroying the earth is largely absent fro prices set at the marketplace" (13).
Market prices set for products don't include the cost that future generations will have to pay to clean up the mess the current
economy is fueling right now. An economy based on the rapid depletion of its own non-renewable resources is certainly destined
for doom, while protection of these resources will save the businesses or corporations money while protecting what fuels it.

El Medio Ambiente y las grandes empresas

Desde el surgimiento de una conciencia ambiental, los negocios y la industria siempre han considerado el ecologismo una
prdida de tiempo, slo en el camino de los beneficios y la produccin. Desde la perspectiva de los negocios, los ambientalistas
presionar por regulaciones y restricciones a las empresas que les costar ms dinero y con frecuencia restringen algunas de sus
prcticas. En qu negocio una economa no sabe es que se puede ahorrar dinero siendo respetuosos del medio ambiente,
protegiendo al mismo tiempo los mismos recursos que dependen. La proteccin del medio ambiente no slo tiene un valor
intrnseco, sino tambin el valor econmico. Comercio y la industria, tambin se pueden beneficiar. Estos factores pueden
conducir a una economa de nuevo desarrollo que protege lo que necesita en lugar de destruirla. A pesar de las diferencias
histricas entre los defensores de los negocios y el medio ambiente, el hecho es que los dos pueden y deben utilizar entre si
para el xito futuro de ambos.
Es importante, para que la economa de ver el medio ambiente algo que vale la pena, para poner un valor econmico en ella. Por
esta razn, un grupo de cientficos del Centro de Investigaciones Sociales y Econmicas en el Medio Ambiente Mundial han
desarrollado una valoracin econmica del medio ambiente. Segn ellos, es necesario imputar un valor a los bienes o servicios
ambientales (Pearce et al, en lnea). Este valor es necesario porque la economa tiene que ver que la proteccin del medio
ambiente puede resultar digno de costos de negocios y la industria. El propsito de la valoracin es mostrar los verdaderos
costos de la utilizacin de los escasos recursos del medio ambiente. Es una manera para los ecologistas y los economistas a
poner una cifra en dlares en los servicios que el entorno ofrece. Robert Costanza, un economista ecolgico de la Universidad
de Maryland, ha hecho justamente esto. La estimacin de los servicios prestados por los ecosistemas en todo el mundo es de 33
billones de dlares anuales, superando el producto nacional bruto de los pases al mundo en conjunto por ocho billones de
dlares (Zimmer 105). El medio ambiente no slo presta servicios comerciales, como la madera, sino tambin en formas menos
visibles. Por ejemplo, los bosques protegen de la erosin del suelo, lo que demuestra difciles de corregir. Con estos hechos en
mente, el agotamiento de los ecosistemas de una prueba costosa recursos, mientras que la proteccin slo se les puede ahorrar
dinero.
Negocios y la economa estadounidense tiene mucho que ganar mediante la alteracin de sus prcticas actuales. Un buen
ejemplo de cmo la proteccin del medio ambiente puede resultar beneficioso para una empresa es un programa creado por 3M
llamado Pollution Prevention Pays. Este programa crea incentivos para evitar que los desechos peligrosos y txicos al modificar
los procesos, el rediseo de equipo, y recuperacin de residuos para su reutilizacin o reciclaje. Desde que el programa fue
diseado en 1975, 3M ha sido capaz de ahorrar ms de 537 millones dlares, mientras que la reduccin de su contaminacin
atmosfrica causada por las 10.000 toneladas, sus aguas residuales por mil millones de galones y de sus residuos slidos por
410.000 toneladas (Hawken 61). Este es un ejemplo de un dinero que hace el negocio de la basura lado a otro de prevencin,
mientras que convertirse en el medio ambiente. Mientras que al mismo tiempo, no ser ambientalmente responsables pueden
causar a las empresas a perder dinero. El costo de la limpieza de residuos puede ser extremadamente caros, mientras que la
reduccin y reciclaje de residuos puede resultar til. Desde una mirada superficial, parece que la economa estadounidense no
necesita hacer ningn cambio en sus prcticas actuales. Despus de todo, los EE.UU. es una de las naciones ms ricas del
mundo. El problema reside en la base de la economa. Amrica fue fundada en florece y debido a sus recursos naturales, la
mayora de ellos no renovables. Estos recursos, como el petrleo, el gas natural una madera, se acabar algn da, es
inevitable. Investigacin de los programas para evitar esto o para incorporar formas alternativas de energa han sido muy poco

investigada. Tal vez la razn de esto es que las acciones que las tierras agotan una especie son recompensados en el mercado,
porque son menos caros, mientras que las acciones que su conservacin no son (Schuss y occidental 329). Es mucho menos
costoso, por ejemplo, para comprar un coche que se alimenta de gasolina, que comprar un coche que funciona con hidrgeno,
aunque el hidrgeno es un recurso renovable y produce casi sin residuos.
Como Paul Hawken, ambientalista y autor de "Ecologa del Comercio", explica, "el aspecto ms perjudicial del sistema
econmico actual es que el costo de destruir la tierra es en gran medida ausente lado a otro los precios fijados en el mercado"
(13). Los precios de mercado establecidos para los productos no incluyen el costo que las generaciones futuras tendrn que
pagar para limpiar el desorden de la economa actual est alimentando ahora mismo. Una economa basada en el rpido
agotamiento de sus propios recursos no renovables es, sin duda destinados a la perdicin, mientras que la proteccin de estos
recursos se ahorrar a las empresas o corporaciones dinero protegiendo al mismo tiempo lo alimenta.
Human interference with our environment is excessive, and the situation is rapidly worsening due to our population growth.
Policies must therefore be changed. These policies affect basic economic, technological, and ideological structures. The way to
these policy changes is in the
"Deep Ecology" ecosophy (110). Deep ecology is a philosophical way of looking at our environmental problems that was founded
in 1972 by Norwegian Arne Naess, a former head of the philosophy department at the University of Oslo. Naess' writings show us
what is wrong with the world and give us a blueprint by which we can bring about change. In its most basic form, deep ecology is
a necessary wisdom, requiring humans to see themselves as part of the bigger picture. That picture is our sacred relationship with
Earth and all beings.
Many believe overpopulation, the greenhouse effect, global warming, and loss of habitat are no cause for alarm. Some, in fact,
claim media and politicians perpetuate the hysteria regarding our environmental decline because they have something to gain by
painting such a bad picture. Countless studies I have read or am personally involved with, however, have convinced me these
problems are real and can be resolved if th
We should teach the deep ecology philosophy in school when the kids are small. This will ensure that our earth's future will be in
the hands of humans who have appreciation of our world and its inhabitants, living and nonliving. It will teach harmony instead of
killing and dominance because deep ecology discards the survival of the fittest concept. (Oslo 1973)
Human interference with the nonhuman world is out of control and getting worse (Drengson). . Therefore, the another principle
requires strategies be put in place for the first-world nations to overcome delusions and laziness on these issues
riches, resources, and diversity of life, except to fulfill vital needs.
La interferencia humana con el medio ambiente es excesiva, y la situacin est empeorando rpidamente, debido a nuestro
crecimiento de la poblacin. Ello, la poltica debe ser cambiada. Estas polticas afectan las estructuras econmicas, tecnolgicas
e ideolgicas. La forma de estos cambios de poltica se encuentra en el
"Ecologa profunda" ecosofa (110). La ecologa profunda es una forma filosfica de ver nuestros problemas ambientales que fue
fundada en 1972 por el noruego Arne Naess, un ex jefe del departamento de filosofa en la Universidad de Oslo. Naess escritos
nos muestran lo que est mal con el mundo y nos dan un plan por el cual podemos lograr un cambio. En su forma ms bsica, la
ecologa profunda es una sabidura necesaria, requiriendo los seres humanos a verse como parte del cuadro ms grande. Esa
imagen es nuestra relacin sagrada con la Tierra y todos los seres.
Muchos creen que la superpoblacin, el efecto invernadero, el calentamiento global, y la prdida de hbitat no son motivo de
alarma. Algunos, de hecho, los medios de reclamacin y los polticos perpetan la histeria acerca de nuestro deterioro del medio
ambiente porque tienen algo que ganar con la pintura como una mala fotografa. Innumerables estudios que he ledo o estoy
personalmente involucrado, sin embargo, me han convencido de estos problemas son reales y pueden ser resueltos si th
Debemos ensear a la filosofa de la ecologa profunda en la escuela cuando los nios son pequeos. Esto asegurar que el

futuro de nuestro planeta estar en manos de seres humanos que tienen reconocimiento de nuestro mundo y sus habitantes,
vivos y no vivos. Le ensear armona en vez de matar y la dominacin, porque la ecologa profunda descarta la supervivencia
del ms apto concepto. (Oslo 1973)
interferencia humana en el mundo no humano est fuera de control y cada vez peor (Drengson). . Por lo tanto, el principio de otro
requiere estrategias de ponerse en marcha para las naciones del primer mundo para eliminar las perturbaciones mentales y la
pereza en estos temas riquezas, recursos y diversidad de la vida, salvo para satisfacer las necesidades vitales.

The Future of Planet Earth

Americans have increasingly divulged themselves in over-consumption. This escalating desire for physical goods is initiating the
depletion of our resources and the destruction of our environment. The people of the United States, in their quest for material
products, are causing catastrophes, such as the greenhouse effect, hazardous wastes, and a growing number of landfills. This in
turn pollutes the planet and catalyzes global warming.
Greenhouse effect has been reeking havoc with the natural balance of the planet. The major agents contributing to the
greenhouse effect are the product modern society has created for our pleasure. In reality, these products are causing the United
States, as well as, the rest of the world, major difficulties. AAA is one company that is using affluenza to its benefit. AAA was
against the 1990 Clean Air Act, one of the most important environmental laws of the decade. A press release from its government
and public affairs headquarters in Washington, D.C., claimed that the bill would threaten the personal mobility of millions of
Americans and jeopardize needed funds for new highway construction and safety improvement (Rivlin 14). Instead of promoting
legislation that would improve the quality of our environment for everyone, AAA would rather build more highways so more people
will purchase automobiles and insurance and therefore further pollute our air supply.
In addition, the effects of the greenhouse gases in the atmosphere have caused the depletion of the polar ice caps. The
greenhouse effect causes the planet to warm, increasing the climate of the Arctic region and causing the glaciers to melt. The
main cause for the rapid warming of the Earth is industrial pollution. The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change has warned the world of the consequences of pollution such as:
the melting of glaciers and polar ice caps, leading to rising sea levels. It predicts more extreme droughts, floods and storms and
significant changes in the functioning of critical ecological systems such as coral reefs and forests. Warmer and wetter conditions
would increase the spread of infectious diseases such as malaria and yellow fever. And the inundation of low-lying islands and
coastal areas could lead to the displacement of hundreds of millions of people. The climate panels report says that sea-level rise
could cause the disappearance of vast swaths of low-lying regions, and along with them various animal species. It suggests that
crop production and aquaculture would be threatened, and with them the livelihood and food security of many inhabitants. And it
points out that the cyclones and monsoons (hurricanes and tornadoes) could become even more frequent and intense. (Borden
8)
Through this detailed description of possible outcomes due to extensive pollution, the planet would suffer tremendously from the
excessive consuming of our affluenza-strickened nation.
Not only do hazardous wastes cause global problems, but they will also continue to be a financial setback unless action is taken
to contain them. The events of Chernobyl are a prime example of how costly hazardous waste can be, but more recently a
situation has arisen in Silver Valley, Idaho. The problems caused by a century of mining in the Silver Valley have the attention of
the top officials in the U.S. Environmental Protection agency (EPA Director). Not only has the near-by soil been contaminated,
but also, the agency recently proposed a 359 million-dollar cleanup plan to address metal contamination from historical mining
practices in the Silver Valley (EPA director). Nuclear power plants fear lawsuits due to their production of hazardous waste. In a
move designed to pave the way for the next generation of nuclear power plants, Congress approved a plan that protects the
nuclear industry from lawsuits arising from any catastrophic accidents. The Bush administration sees liability protection as a
necessary step before companies will build new nuclear plants, which is a cornerstone of the presidents energy policy. Under this
plan, the government would pay for any power plant accident whose claims and cleanup cost more than $9.4 billion (Wilkie). This
legislation assures nuclear power plants that the government supports their long-term growth. This, in turn, shows that the
demand for electricity is deeply rooted in affluenza and will continue to strive in further generations.
Americans need for constant stimulation has caused an overload of garbage. There are more landfills now then ever before. We
are constantly looking for more space to dump our old possessions, even if it means tapping into our forest preserves. In
Wisconsin, the state is suing a local landfill company. A state Department of Justice complaint said Material Recovery Services
violated solid waste laws by not removing liquid waste, failing to property close and cap parts of the landfill and exceeding yard
waste capacity limits (State Accuses). The increase in waste has caused landfill companies to surpass their legal limit. This
problem needs to be handled now or there will be no room for garbage at all.
Global warming has become more intense and pollution of the planet has severely increased. The greenhouse effect, hazardous
wastes, and the large number of landfills have all contributed to an unhealthy Earth. Sustainable development is needed in order

to break the cycle of harmful practices of the past. To attain this system, action must be taken against political standstills
surrounding environmental issues. It is the responsibility of the industrialized countries, particularly the United States, to ensure
the longevity of the Earth for future generations.
Todays environment is distracting state and evey one has to protect the environment .the root cause being the globilisation or
industrilization.but it is prime responsibility to have a optimal balance between these two.as we r protecting our environment
means we r protecting our future generation.we r interdependent on our environment and d the environment as well.unspeculative
conseqences may occur in we neglect our environment.
How does the environment affect us?
The environment affects us in many different ways to include our health, habitat, and food supply. If we choose not to protect
the environment we will not be able to sustain life for our future generations. We must make to right choices to protect the
environment from global warming. Global warming affects us all in some way so we must make the ethical decision for our future
generations by seeking ways to slow down and eventually stop the warming trend. We must take action and stop the warming
trend that is happening every day around us, by reducing greenhouse gases and seeking alternate means for energy.
Causes of climate change
Climate changes are caused by global warming and the effects of greenhouse gases on the environment. The environment
continues to diminish do to global warming and the excessive use of gasoline powered cars. We as a society fuel the flame of
global warming by using these gasoline powered vehicles when there are alternate fuels available. The government agency in
charge need to take an ethical stand to protect the environment by investing in alternate forms of energy. The constant polluting of
our environment will leave our world inhabitable for future generations to come.
The environmental issues we face today are a direct reflection of mans greed to make money from oil companies and a
lack of morals to do the greater good for mankind. The lack of respect for the environment and how it affects us will cause us
grave harm from the effects of climate changes. Deforestation of our forest and climate changes causing a lack of precipitation
which leads to forest fires is destroying our trees. The trees are needed to reduce our carbon levels in the atmosphere and
replenish our oxygen supply.
Cmo funciona el medio ambiente nos afecta?
El medio ambiente nos afecta de muchas maneras diferentes para incluir a nuestra salud, hbitat y suministro de alimentos. Si
optamos por no proteger el medio ambiente no ser capaz de sostener la vida para nuestras futuras generaciones. Tenemos que
hacer decisiones correctas para proteger el medio ambiente por el calentamiento global. El calentamiento global nos afecta a
todos de alguna manera por lo que debemos tomar la decisin tica para nuestras futuras generaciones mediante la bsqueda
de maneras de disminuir la velocidad y, finalmente, detener la tendencia al calentamiento. Es preciso intervenir y detener la
tendencia al calentamiento que ocurre todos los das a nuestro alrededor, mediante la reduccin de gases de efecto invernadero
y la bsqueda de medios alternativos para obtener energa.
Causas del cambio climtico
Los cambios climticos son causados por el calentamiento global y los efectos de los gases de efecto invernadero en el
medio ambiente. El medio ambiente contina disminuyendo hacer para el calentamiento global y el uso excesivo de los coches
de gasolina. Nosotros, como sociedad de combustible la llama del calentamiento global mediante el uso de estos vehculos de
motor con gasolina cuando hay combustibles alternativos disponibles. La agencia gubernamental a cargo necesidad de adoptar
una postura tica de proteger el medio ambiente mediante la inversin en formas alternativas de energa. La contaminacin
constante de nuestro medio ambiente, salir de nuestro mundo habitable para las futuras generaciones por venir.
Los problemas ambientales que enfrentamos hoy en da son un reflejo directo de la codicia sirve para hacer dinero de las
compaas petroleras y una falta de moral de hacer el mayor bien para la humanidad. La falta de respeto al medio ambiente y
cmo afecta a nosotros nos causa grave dao de los efectos del cambio climtico. La deforestacin de nuestros bosques y los
cambios climticos que causan la falta de precipitacin que conduce a los incendios forestales est destruyendo nuestros
rboles. Los rboles son necesarios para reducir nuestros niveles de carbono en la atmsfera y reponer nuestro suministro de
oxgeno.
A part of environmental management is also conserving natural resources which is not only beneficial for healthy environments
but also builds a sustainable economy. We must protect our environment to reduce the corresponding risks to health, and
maximize the opportunities of building a sustainable future for our kids. The environment greatly matters on the health of many
people around the world. Based on a research major diseases are growing faster in developing countries than developed
countries, where the concern of supporting healthy environments has yet been not achieved.
Una parte de la gestin ambiental es tambin la conservacin de los recursos naturales que no slo es beneficiosa para los
entornos saludables sino que tambin construye una economa sostenible. Debemos proteger nuestro medio ambiente para
reducir los riesgos inherentes a la salud, y maximizar las oportunidades de construir un futuro sostenible para nuestros hijos. El
medio ambiente en gran medida las cuestiones sobre la salud de muchas personas alrededor del mundo. Basado en una
investigacin de las enfermedades importantes estn creciendo ms rpido en los pases en desarrollo que los pases
desarrollados, en los que todava la preocupacin de apoyar a los ambientes saludables no se ha logrado.