Professional Documents
Culture Documents
available at www.sciencedirect.com
KEYWORDS
High sensitivity e
C-reactive protein;
Bronchial asthma;
Pulmonary function
tests;
Sputum cell counts
Summary
Background: Two major acute-phase proteins were identified in human, C-reactive protein and
serum amyloid A. There are 3 types of C-reactive protein assays: conventional C-reactive protein,
high sensitivity C-reactive protein and cardiac C-reactive protein. High sensitivity C-reactive
protein assays can detect minor inflammatory changes that could be missed by other indices of
inflammation. Induced sputum cell counts are relatively non-invasive, safe and reliable method
for identifying the presence and type of airway inflammation in asthmatic patients.
Purpose of the work: This study was designed to detect the role of serum levels of high sensitivity
C-reactive protein in asthmatic patients with or without inhaled corticosteroids treatment. Also
to determine the relationship of serum high sensitivity C-reactive protein levels to clinical indices
of asthma and inflammatory cell counts in induced sputum.
Subjects & Methods: Serum high sensitivity C-reactive protein level, pulmonary function tests,
body mass index and induced sputum cell counts were estimated in 50 asthmatic patients (26
steroid inhaled and 24 steroid nave). Fifteen healthy volunteers, who matched in age and sex
with the other groups, were used as a control group.
Results: There was an increase of high sensitivity C-reactive protein in asthmatic patients among
both steroid inhaled and steroid nave patients compared to the healthy controls. Serum high
sensitivity C-reactive protein correlated negatively with pulmonary function tests and positively
with sputum eosinophil % in both inhaled steroid and steroid nave groups.
Conclusion: High sensitivity C-reactive protein is one of the markers of systemic inflammation that
can be indirectly reflecting the degree of severity of airway inflammation in bronchial asthma.
2009 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Introduction
C-reactive protein (CRP) is the first acute-phase protein to be
described and is highly sensitive systemic marker of inflammation, infection and tissue damage.1 CRP is predominantly
produced and secreted by hepatocytes, although other cells
including alveolar macrophages may also synthesize it2 under
control of cytokines mainly interleukin-6 (IL-6). A positive CRP
may be an indicator of several conditions including rheumatoid arthritis, rheumatic fever, cancer, tuberculosis, pneumonia, heart attack and systemic lupus. There is also a high
sensitivity CRP (hs-CRP) assay in addition to the conventional
CRP test. The hs-CRP measures very low amount of CRP in the
blood (below 0.2 mg/L) and is typically used to assess risk for
heart problems3 and can be used as prognostic marker for
development of diabetes mellitus. A population based study
showed an association of increased level of serum hs-CRP with
a high frequency of airway hyper responsiveness and low
forced expiratory volume in one second FEV1 among
subjects without heart disease,4 suggesting that systemic
inflammation may be associated with respiratory impairment.
Asthma is a chronic inflammatory airway disorder characterized by airway hyper responsiveness and inflammation,
in which various cells as eosinophils, neutrophils, macrophages, T lymphocytes, cytokines and mediators play a role.
Besides local inflammation, systemic inflammation is present
in asthma as shown by increased level of plasma fibrinogen
and serum myeloid A (SAA).5 Thus hs-CRP could be a useful
tool for detecting systemic inflammation in asthma.6
1879
According to the severity of asthma based on symptoms
and lung function tests; asthmatic patients were classified
into intermittent, mild persistent, moderate persistent and
severe persistent cases.7 Patients included in this study
were those of moderate persistent (pre-bronchodilator
FEV1 60e80% predicted) and severe persistent asthma
categories (pre-bronchodilator FEV1 < 60% predicted) as
they were the usual groups presenting to the outpatient
chest clinic.
Patients were divided into the following groups:
Group (A): Included (26) asthmatic patients who were on
inhaled corticosteroids (ICSve) in their usual
treatment of asthma besides bronchodilators.
This group was divided into 2 subgroups
according to asthma severity: subgroup (A1):
included 11 cases of moderate persistent
asthma and subgroup (A2): included 15 cases of
severe persistent asthma.
Group (B): Comprised (24) steroid nave asthmatic patients
(not on inhaled corticosteroids) (ICSve).This
group was further divided also into 2 subgroups
according to asthma severity: subgroup (B1)
which included 12 patients of moderate persistent asthma and subgroup (B2) which included
12 patients of severe persistent asthma.
Control group
(group C): Included 15 apparently healthy nonsmoker individuals matched in age and sex with the other 2
groups.
All the patients and healthy controls had been subjected
to the following:
- Full detailed history taking including: (age, sex, duration of bronchial asthma, patients medications and
family history of allergic diseases).
- Clinical examination, including: vital signs and BMI. The
latter is defined as weight in kilograms divided by square
of height in meters {wt in kg/(height in meter)2}.8
- Local chest examination.
- Investigations included:
1. Plain chest X-ray (PA view).
2. Complete blood count (CBC), total white blood cell
counts (WBCS) and differential cell count.
3. Electrocardiogram (ECG).
4. Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) using (Vitallograph
compact device), which is calibrated daily. Patients
maximum effort had been used in performing the
test so as to avoid any expected error in diagnosis.
Results were obtained for forced vital capacity
(FVC), FEV1, FEV1/FVC percentage and forced expiratory flow at 25e75% of FVC (FEF 25e75%).
5. Sputum induction9: Patients and controls had been
medicated with inhaled salbutamol 200 mg, in hypertonic saline 5% administered for 15 min by ultrasonic
nebulizer. Before expectoration, they were instructed
to rinse their mouth to minimize saliva and then asked
to expectorate sputum into a sterile plastic dish.
6. Sputum processing and staining: Sputum samples were
processed within two to seven hours of expectoration
as delayed processing and examination more than nine
1880
70
2
1. 5
FEV1/FVC
Mean hs -CRP
(mg/ L)
2. 5
1
0. 5
0
Group A
Group B
50
Group C
Groups
Figure 1
60
40
Statistical analysis
All obtained data were analyzed statistically by SPSS software version 14. Data were presented as range and
30
0
Figure 2
4
hs-CRP (mg/L)
Results
On studying the general characteristics of all studied
subjects, it was found that there was no difference in the
mean age in group A & B (33.3 11) and (35.1 12.1)
respectively (P > 0.05). There was no difference between
both groups of bronchial asthma regarding duration of the
disease (P > 0.05). Considering BMI, there was no significant
difference in BMI among all of the asthmatic patients and
healthy control (P > 0.05).
Fig. 1 shows hs-CRP levels among the studied groups. It
was found that group B had a mean value of hs-CRP of
2.63 2.1 mg/L which was higher than that of group A and
healthy control group. The difference of hs-CRP mean value
between group A (2.35 1.66) and B (2.63 2.1) was not
significant (P > 0.05). On the other hand, the difference
between both groups A and B in comparison with control
group (0.70 0.67) showed a highly significant difference
(P < 0.01) (Fig. 1).
Correlation between age, duration of bronchial asthma,
BMI and hs-CRP using Spearman correlation was done.
There was no significant correlation of age, duration of
bronchial asthma, BMI and hs-CRP among all studied
patients and healthy controls.
Correlation of hs-CRP to pulmonary function tests using
Spearman correlation is illustrated in Table 1. Among group
A, hs-CRP had a significant negative correlation with FEV1/
FVC, PEF and FEF 25e75%. In group B, hs-CRP had
1881
macrophage %(r Z 0.56, P Z 0.005) and lymphocytes %
(r Z 0.55, P Z 0.006). There was no significant correlation
between hs-CRP and sputum cell counts in the control
group (Fig. 3).
Discussion
Figure 3
group B.
Table 1
Studied groups
Group A
Total (n Z 26)
Group B
Total (n Z 24)
Control (n Z 15)
FEV1
FEV1/FVC
PEF
FEF 25e75%
P-value
P-value
P-value
P-value
0.11
0.49
0.006
0.58
0.01*
0.98
0.48
0.67
0.01
0.01**
0.0001***
0.96
0.45
0.65
0.27
0.02*
0.001***
0.48
0.4
0.63
0.24
0.043*
0.001***
0.41
* denotes significant difference; ** denotes high significant difference; and *** denotes very high significant difference.
1882
Table 2
Main group
Macrophage %
Group A (n Z 26)
Group B (n Z 24)
Control group (n Z 15)
Neutrophil %
Lymphocyte %
Range
Mean SD
Range
Mean SD
Range
Mean SD
Range
Mean SD
0e39
1e34
40e69
13.2 9.5
6 7.6
57.06 9.01
41e88
1e84
30e60
71.8 12.2
52.5 19.5
40.73 8.50
1e22
13e78
0e6
6.8 5.2
33 14.6
1.40 2.02
2e24
1e80
0e3
8.1 5.6
8.8 16.3
1.20 1.08
Eosinophil %
Studied groups
Group A
Group B
Control group
Total (n Z 26)
Total (n Z 24)
(n Z 15)
Macrophage%
Neutrophils%
Eosinophils%
Lymphocytes%
P-value
P-value
P-value
P-value
0.05
0.56
0.15
0.8
0.005*
0.57
0.11
0.18
0.154
0.6
0.4
0.58
0.44
0.66
0.08
0.025*
< 0.001**
0.78
0.38
0.55
0.04
0.06
0.006*
0.89
* denotes significant difference; ** denotes high significant difference; and *** denotes very high significant difference.
Conclusion
-
Conflict of interest
The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors
alone are responsible for the content and writing of the
paper. None of the authors had a financial support for this
paper.
References
1. Pepys MB, Baltz ML. Acute phase proteins with special
reference to C-reactive protein and related proteins (pentaxins) and serum amyloid A protein. Adv Immunol 1983;34:
141e212.
2. Dong Q, Wright JR. Expression of C-reactive protein by alveolar
macrophages. J Immunol 1996;156:4815e20.
3. Roberts WL, Moulton L, Law TC, et al. Evaluation of nine
automated high sensitivity C-reactive protein methods: implication for clinical & epidemiological application. Clin Chem
2001;47:418e25.
4. Ridker PM, Cushman M, Stampfer MJ, Tracy RP, Hennekens CH.
Inflammation, aspirin, and the risk of cardiovascular disease in
apparently healthy men. N Engl J Med 1997;336:973e9.
1883
5. Kony S, Zureik M, Driss F, Neukirch C, Leynaert B, Neukirch F.
Association of bronchial hyper responsiveness and lung function with C-reactive protein (CRP): a population based study.
Thorax 2004;59:892e6.
6. Rifai N, Tracy RP, Ridker PM. Clinical efficacy of an automated
hs-CRP assay. Clin Chem 1999;45:2136e41.
7. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI). Global
initiative for asthma, global strategy for asthma management
and prevention revised (GINA); 2002. p. 68e78.
8. Harik-khan RI, Fleg JI, Wise RA. Body mass index & risk of
COPD. Chest 2002;121:370e6.
9. Pin I, Gibson PG, Kolendowicz R, Gabardo G, Denburg JA,
Hargreave FE, et al. Use of induced sputum cell counts to
investigate airway inflammation in asthma. Thorax 1992;47:
25e9.
10. Efthimiadis A, Pizzichinin E, Pizzichini MM, Hargreave FE.
Sputum examination for indices of airway inflammation:
laboratory procedures. Eur Respir J 2002;19:706e8.
11. Taplin L. Malignant cells in sputum. A simple method of liquefying sputum. J Med Lab Technol 1966;23:252.
12. Bancrot JD, Gamble M, editors. Theory and practice of histological techniques. 5th ed. Churchill Livingstone; 2002. p.
631e2.
13. Gibson PG, Wlodarczyk JW, Hensley MJ, Glesson M, Henry PL,
Cripps AW, et al. Epidemiological association of airway
inflammation with asthma symptoms and airway hyperresponsivness in childhood. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998;
158:36e41.
14. Rifai N, Ridker PM. Population distributions of C-reactive
protein in apparently healthy men and women in the United
States: implication for clinical interpretation. Clin Chem 2003;
49:666e9.
15. Ford ES. Asthma, body mass index, and C-reactive protein
among US adults. J Asthma 2003;40:733e9.
16. Gan WQ, Man SFP, Senthilselvan A, Sin DD. Association between
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and systemic inflammation: a systematic review and a meta-analysis. Thorax 2004;
59:574e80.
17. Bousquet J, Jeffery PK, Busse WW, Johnson M, Vignola AM.
Asthma from broncho-constriction to airways inflammation and
remodeling. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;161:1720e45.
18. Jousilahti P, Salomaa V, Hakala K. The association of sensitive
systemic inflammation markers with bronchial asthma. Immunology 2002;89:381e5.
19. Takemura A, Matsumoto H, Niimi A, Ueda T, Matsuoka H,
Yamaguchi M, et al. High sensitivity C-reactive protein in
asthma. Eur Respir J 2006;27:908e12.
20. Anderson GP. COPD, asthma and C-reactive protein. Eur Respir J
2006;27:874e6.
21. Doganci A, Sauer K, Karwot R, Finotto S. Pathological role of IL6 in the experimental allergic bronchial asthma in mice. Clin
Rev Allergy Immunol 2005;28:257e70.
22. de Torres JP, Cordoba-Lanus E, Lo
pez-Aguilar C, de Fuentes M,
de Garcini A, Aguirre-Jaime A, et al. C-reactive protein levels
and clinically important predictive outcomes in stable COPD
patients. Eur Respir J 2006;27:902e7.
23. Nakamura H, Yamashita T. Predictive value of cardiovascular
events by high sensitivity CRP. Nippon Rinsho 2002;60:
916e21.
24. Ridker PM. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein potential
adjunct for global risk assessment in the primary prevention of
cardiovascular disease. Circulation 2001;103:1813e8.
25. Visser M, Bouter LM, McQuillan GM, Wener M, Harris T. Elevated
C-reactive protein levels in overweight and obese adults. JAMA
1999;282:2131e5.
26. Kauffmann F, Frette C, Annes I. Relationships of haptoglobin
level to FEV1, wheezing, bronchial hyper-responsiveness and
allergy. Clin Exp Allergy 1991;21:669e74.
1884
27. Dahl M, Tybjaerg-Hansen A, Vestbo J, Lange P, Nordestgaard BG.
Elevated plasma fibrinogen associated with reduced pulmonary
function and increased risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary
disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;164:1008e11.
28. Engstrom G, Lind P, Hedblad B, Wollmer P, Stavenow L,
Janzon L, et al. Lung function and cardiovascular risk: relationship with inflammation sensitive plasma proteins. Circulation 2002;106:2555e60.
29. Gibson PG, Simpson JL, Saltas N. Heterogeneity of airway
inflammation in persistent asthma: evidence of neutrophilic
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.