You are on page 1of 2

18/02/15

EGB100 Engineering Sustainability and Professional Practice Criterion Reference Assessment sheet
Week 2: In-class assessment on teamwork (group activity, individual assessment)

Student No:

Student Name:

Assessor:

Grade:

Objectives assessed:

Performance
standard
Criteria
Information
acquisition
Information
synthesis
knowledge
acquisition

(a) Understanding of teamwork (Identification of the fundamentals of effective teamwork)


(b) Collaborate within a team (Demonstration of contribution to planning of team roles and a team charter)

High distinction/
Exceptional
7
Demonstration of the
acquisition of
knowledge from
prescribed texts and
exceptional ability in
the comprehension of
in-class material, and
the synthesis and
interpretation of this
knowledge leading to
clear identification of
the fundamentals of
effective teamwork.

Distinction/ Very high


level
6
Demonstration of
excellent ability in the
comprehension of inclass material, and
synthesis and
interpretation of this
knowledge leading to
clear identification of
the fundamentals of
effective teamwork,
but no demonstration
of the acquisition of
knowledge from
prescribed texts.

Credit/ High level


5
Demonstration of
good ability in the
comprehension of inclass material, and
synthesis and
interpretation of this
knowledge leading to
adequate
identification of the
fundamentals of
effective teamwork,
but no demonstration
of the acquisition of
knowledge from
prescribed texts.

Pass/ Acceptable
level
4
Demonstration of
average ability in the
comprehension of inclass material, and
synthesis and
interpretation of this
knowledge leading to
simplistic
identification of the
fundamentals of
effective teamwork,
and no
demonstration of the
acquisition of
knowledge from
prescribed texts.

Marginal fail

Fail/Low fail

3
Poor ability in the
comprehension of inclass material, and
synthesis of this
knowledge, no
attempt made for the
interpretation of the
knowledge acquired
and no
demonstration of the
acquisition of
knowledge from
prescribed texts.

2/1
Very poor ability in
the comprehension of
in-class material, no
attempt made for
synthesis of this
knowledge or
interpretation of the
knowledge acquired
and no
demonstration of the
acquisition of
knowledge from
prescribed texts.

18/02/15

Performance
standard
Criteria
Identification of
appropriate roles for
individuals within a
team
Contribution to
planning of team
roles and a team
charter

High distinction/
Exceptional
7
Demonstration of
exceptional
understanding of
appropriate team
roles and significant
contribution to
planning of the team
charter.

Distinction/ Very high


level
6
Demonstration of
excellent
understanding of
appropriate team
roles and significant
contribution to
planning of the team
charter.

Credit/ High level


5
Demonstration of
good understanding
of appropriate team
roles and adequate
contribution to
planning of the team
charter.

Pass/ Acceptable
level
4
Demonstration of
average
understanding of
appropriate team
roles and adequate
contribution to
planning of the team
charter.

Marginal fail
3
Poor understanding
of team roles and
limited contribution
to planning of the
team charter.

Fail/Low fail
2/1
Very poor
understanding of
team roles but no
contribution to
planning of the team
charter.

You might also like