You are on page 1of 3

Facebook History of Stan Caterbone Wall Posts From November 23, 2009 to

February 9, 2010 to Scribd http://bit.ly/das1wy


Twitter - Stan Caterbone Tweets from December 11, 2009 to February 9,
2010.pdf (application/pdf Object): http://bit.ly/axBeLd
NOTICE: What are frequently asked questions and answers about Targeted
Individuals? Human Rights info 101: http://bit.ly/as4Xyq
NEW! YouTube - Mental Telepathy & Electromagnetic Weapons Part 14 Lambert
A&E Segment 5 video 2010 02 09: http://bit.ly/aiZ28h
NEW! YouTube - Mental Telepathy & Electromagnetic Weapons Part 13 Lambert
A&E Segment 4 video 2010 02 09: http://bit.ly/8ZIw8b
NEW! YouTube - Mental Telepathy & Electromagnetic Weapons Part 12 Lambert
A&E Segment 3 video 2010 02 09: http://bit.ly/ar6lpz
NEW! YouTube - Mental Telepathy & Electromagnetic Weapons Part 11 Lambert
A&E Segment 2 video 2010 02 09: http://bit.ly/9E8ag6
NEW! YouTube - Mental Telepathy & Electromagnetic Weapons Part 10 Lambert
A&E Segment 1 video 2010 02 09: http://bit.ly/denz0t
Larry Stengel's Opinion - Michelle Lambert PCRA OPINION by Judge Larry Stengel
of August 24, 1998: http://bit.ly/d5uzAP
1998 EXPOSE for the Lisa Michelle Lambert Case - Had Lancaster County
Pennsylvania Lost It's Sovereignty: http://bit.ly/bZZz6T
IMPORTANT NOTICE - 1998 Affidavit for the Lisa Michelle Lambert Murder Trial
May 1998: http://bit.ly/aE1v5J
Lancaster Newspapers Archives of all Lisa Michelle Lambert Newspaper
Articles
Las Angeles Times Series on the Lisa Michelle/Lori Show Murder Case
Was Judge Larry Stengel Involved in 1987 with the Extorted $25,000 from the
Airplane and My Attorney Tim Lanza Representing M. Johnson?
From the Advanced Media Group Blog:
In 1997 CATERBONE had solicited Attorney Christina Rainville of Philadelphia and pro bono
attorney for Lisa Michelle Lambert in the Laurie Show murder case. The murder trials and appeals
of the Lambert case demonized Ms. Christina Rainville and U.S. District Court Judge Stewart
Dalzell.

After CATERBONE submitted documents and audio recordings, Ms. Christina Rainville had
communicated with CATERBONE that she was not able to take his case due to the fact that her
Philadelphia law firm had banned her from taking on any more Lancaster County residents,
despite the fact that many more sought her legal counsel.
On December 31, 1997, CATERBONE had also personally delivered a CD-ROM to the chambers of
U.S. District Court Judge Stewart Dalzall in an effort to bring attention to his case. In May of 1998
CATERBONE submitted an AFFADAVIT to the law firm of Schneider and Harrison outlining the
prosecutorial misconduct or Finding of Facts of the 1987 cover-up for Ms. Christina Rainville.
CATERBONE alleges that these facts were part of the attitude and the motives for the law
enforcement-at-large of Lancaster County and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to ignore the
rule of law and procedure in order to bring these false arrests and malicious prosecutions. The
Lancaster County community-at-large had the same attitude toward CATERBONE.
The Lambert case received national notoriety when U.S. District Judge Stuart Dalzell freed
Lambert on a Habeus Corpus appeal hearing citing she was actually innocent beyond a
reasonable doubt. Judge Dalzell was quoted in chambers as saying, I can tell you, Mr.
Madenspacher, that Ive thought about nothing else but this case for over three weeks, and in my
experience, sir, and I invite you to disabuse me of this at oral argument, I want you and I want
the Schnader firm to look for any case in any jurisdiction in the English-speaking world where
there has been as much prosecutorial misconduct, because I havent found it.
The case was covered by a 3 part series in the Los Angeles Times by writer Barry Seigel on
November 10, 1997 and a television episode on the A&E Network American Justice Series. The
Lancaster community gathered over 37,000 signatures on a petition to impeach U.S. District
Judge Stewart Dalzell for his rulings. In the end, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania took control
of the case and appealed the ruling that freed Lambert sending her back to prison.
The case went all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court in 2005, after being denied any review. The
case accentuated the rights of Federal Law vs. State Law and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
solicited a team of attorney generals from across the nation to help their cause.
CATERBONE attended a hearing before Judge Larry Stengel in the Lancaster County Court of
Common Pleas and to this day, due to his knowledge and experience with the Lancaster County
Judicial System and Law Enforcement believes the case should have never been conducted
without a jury trial, and that the over zealous prosecution proves that prosecutorial misconduct
was never thoroughly investigated or prosecuted in the Lambert case. CATERBONE will not let that
happen in his cases.

In addition the U.S. District Judge that took over the Lambert Case after Judge
Stewart Dalzall was forced to recuse himself was U.S. District Judge Anita Brody.
Judge Anita Brody has ruled on several of my cases in the U.S. District Court for
the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
All of my challenges to my Chapter 11
Bankruptcy Petition Case No. 05-23059 are heard by Judge Anita Brody. This
may not be coincidence.
Stan J. Caterbone
Advanced Media Group
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
www.advancedmediagroup.wordpress.com

http://www.scribd.com/amgroup01
www.facebook.com/scaterbone
www.twitter.com/StanCaterbone
www.mcvictimsworld.ning.com/profile/StanJCaterbone
www.youtube.com/advancedmediagroup
Notice and Disclaimer: Stan J. Caterbone and the Advanced Media Group have been slandered, defamed, and publicly
discredited since 1987 due to going public (Whistle Blower) with allegations of misconduct and fraud within International
Signal & Control, Plc. of Lancaster, Pa. (ISC pleaded guilty to selling arms to Iraq via South Africa and a $1 Billion Fraud in
1992). Unfortunately we are forced to defend our reputation and the truth without the aid of law enforcement and the
media, which would normally prosecute and expose public corruption. We utilize our communications to thwart further
libelous and malicious attacks on our person, our property, and our business. We continue our fight for justice through the
Courts, and some communications are a means of protecting our rights to continue our pursuit of justice. Advanced Media
Group is also a member of the media. Reply if you wish to be removed from our Contact List. How long can Lancaster
County and Lancaster City hide me and Continue to Cover-Up my Whistle Blowing of the ISC Scandel?

Summation: Due to the actions and criminal activity of the foregoing (see Criminal Indictment Page), it is reasonable
to prove that every aspect of the Complainant's life, Stan J. Caterbone, is subject to undo influence; harassment; torture;
obstruction; etc. This situation and set of circumstances as outlined here, and in the page "State of Affairs" and all
previous filings; reports; and statements, is a prescription for only one endgame - death or suicide. There is no life action
or activity that is immune from this horrendous HATE CRIME. The precedent and landmark elements that make this so
appalling is that the Complainant has never done anything to set these circumstances in motion but to be right regarding
International Signal & Control back in 1987; as well as many other proclamations and forecasts. That being said, it is also
widely reported that many Targeted Individuals and Victims of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control are lead to death and/or
suicide. The Lancaster Community-At-Large is guilty of creating; abetting; fostering; and executing this tragedy. The fact
that local; state; and federal law enforcement induce and encourage this environment of hate is landmark.

You might also like