You are on page 1of 30

spectrum A

3.5

3.0

2.5

2.0

1.5

1.0

spectrum B
3.5

1.30

3.0

1.25

2.5

1.20

1.15
1.10
Chemical Shift (ppm)

2.0

1.5

1.05

1.0

1.00

20.3
5.3
3.2
0.8
-11.8

516.2
503.5
501.1
499.0
496.5
483.9
7.4

511.0
504.2
496.2
489.0

1003.7
996.4

apparent virtual
coupling to A and B

1.0

2.0

1.5

1.0
Chemical Shift (ppm)

0.5

A,B

0.9

0.8

0.7

0.6
0.5
0.4
Chemical Shift (ppm)

0.3

0.2

7.4
-7.4

1.0

0.9

B A3

1.0

0.1

511.4
504.2
496.2
489.4
453.3
446.4

more lines than


expected

0.8

0.7

0.6
0.5
0.4
Chemical Shift (ppm)

0.3

0.2

0.1

A3

0.9

0.8

0.7

0.6
0.5
0.4
Chemical Shift (ppm)

0.3

0.2

0.1

1D 1H spectrum

6 7

9-12

positive and negative:


H(1) and H(8) COSY

positive: correlation
between H(1) and (2)

irradiated peak

45

negative: exchange
due to OH(7)
1D NOESY spectrum
3.5

3.0

2.5

2.0
Chemical Shift (ppm)

1.5

1.0

100.0
0.5

0
-0.5
Chemical Shift (ppm)

99.8
0.5

0
-0.5
Chemical Shift (ppm)

98.9
0.5

0
-0.5
Chemical Shift (ppm)

91.4
0.5

0
-0.5
Chemical Shift (ppm)

0.20

0.15

40.2

0.10

0.05
0
-0.05
Chemical Shift (ppm)

-0.10

-0.15

-0.20

-0.25 -0.30

9.0
-0.1

0.25

9.7

4.9

31.7
7

0.25

0.20

0.15

0.10

0.05
0
-0.05
Chemical Shift (ppm)

-0.10

-0.15

-0.20

-0.25 -0.30

98.0 90.0
5

4
3
Chemical Shift (ppm)

137.3
2

143.8
1

13102.7
13092.4
13082.2
160

160

133

132

131

130
129
128
Chemical Shift (ppm)

127

158

156
154
Chemical Shift (ppm)

155

150

152

145

150

119.0

118.5
118.0
117.5
Chemical Shift (ppm)

140
135
Chemical Shift (ppm)

130

126

125

124

123

11258.5
11251.9
11239.4
11232.8

134

11899.5
11882.0
11863.7

135

16017.6
16010.3

16267.9
16260.6

136

112.0
111.5
Chemical Shift (ppm)

117.0

125

120

115

80.0
77.5
75.0
Chemical Shift (ppm)

How many distinct carbon signals are there? There are 9, due to the symmetry plane in the
difluoroaryl ring.

(2)

Does the spectrum have 9 signals in it? Clearly, there are more than 9 signals here due to
carbon-fluorine couplings. First, recognize that the peak near 77 ppm is deuterochloroform,
which is showing a 1:1:1 triplet due to coupling to an I=1 nucleus, deuterium. Next, label the
carbons (blue numbers at the bottom).

(3)

Why are there ten signals, not nine?

100 MHz, CDCl3

160

134

133

132

131

130
129
128
Chemical Shift (ppm)

127

11899.5
11882.0
11863.7
158

156
154
Chemical Shift (ppm)

160

135

16017.6
16010.3

16267.9
16260.6

136

152

3 4

155

150

145

150

119.0

118.5
118.0
117.5
Chemical Shift (ppm)

140
135
Chemical Shift (ppm)

130

126

125

124

123

11258.5
11251.9
11239.4
11232.8

(1)

13102.7
13092.4
13082.2

112.0
111.5
Chemical Shift (ppm)

117.0

125

120

10

115

CDCl3

80.0
77.5
75.0
Chemical Shift (ppm)

(3)

Why are there ten signals, not nine? The numbering isnt right. Recall the couplings in
fluorobenzene:

N
F

JCF = 245 Hz
JCF = 21
3
JCF = 8
4
JCF = 3

100 MHz, CDCl3

13102.7
13092.4
13082.2

At 100 MHz, a 245 Hz coupling is 2.45 ppm. There are four or five notches between the peaks,
which is about right (0.5 ppm/notch). More accurately, this is a doublet of doublets with a
coupling of 16267.9-16017.6 = 250.3 Hz. Thus, this is a one-bond
coupling. The smaller coupling is 7.3 Hz, which is a three-bond/vicinal
coupling:
136
135
134
133
132
131
130
129
128
127
126
125
124
123

11899.5
11882.0
11863.7

16017.6
16010.3

16267.9
16260.6

F
1

N
1

one-bond coupling
160

158

156
154
Chemical Shift (ppm)

160

155

150

152

145

150

119.0

118.5
118.0
117.5
Chemical Shift (ppm)

140
135
Chemical Shift (ppm)

130

11258.5
11251.9
11239.4
11232.8

Chemical Shift (ppm)

vicinal coupling
112.0
111.5
Chemical Shift (ppm)

117.0

125

120

115

CDCl3

80.0
77.5
75.0
Chemical Shift (ppm)

100 MHz, CDCl3

F
3

predicted carbon-13 shifts

137.2

160

149.2

158

156
154
Chemical Shift (ppm)

155

150

11899.5
11882.0
11863.7

(4)136 Fluorine
couplings.
135
134
133
132

2 3

160

120.8

16017.6
16010.3

16267.9
16260.6

F 124.2
160.0 154.6
111.6
113.7 N
160.0
130.6
F
111.6

152

150

119.0
150.1

145

130
129
128
127
126
Chemical
(ppm)vicinal couplings
3 hasShift
small

3
117.0

149.6
Chemical Shift (ppm)

140
135
Chemical Shift (ppm)

130

125

124

123

to two
fluorines, while 2 doesnt, which is why
it looks fatter (look at the peak height
at half maximum).

118.5
118.0
117.5
Chemical
Shift (ppm)
149.9
149.8
149.7

150.0

131

11258.5
11251.9
11239.4
11232.8

Height of Peaks. Recall that quaternary carbons are often shorter than protonated ones (this is
due to differential relaxation and a lack of nOe enhancment; to be discussed in detail later).
According to the ChemDraw predictions, the only carbons which should be really downfield are
the ones next to nitrogen. One of them is quaternary, and one of them is protonated, which
makes sense if this assignment is made:
13102.7
13092.4
13082.2

(4)

149.5

149.4

125

149.3

112.0
111.5
Chemical
149.1 Shift (ppm)

149.2

120

115

CDCl3

80.0
77.5
75.0
Chemical Shift (ppm)

Other Fluorine-Coupled Peaks. What are the other peaks? Carbon 8 is a true 1:2:1 triplet with J
= 17.5x2 Hz, which can only happen if it has two geminal (two-bond) couplings to two equal
fluorines. Therefore, it must be the ipso carbon on the fluorinated ring. It also has a very small
height, which makes sense for a quaternary carbon.
13102.7
13092.4
13082.2

100 MHz, CDCl3

F
1

158

156
154
Chemical Shift (ppm)

160

N
1

160

135

155

150

134

133

132

131

130
129
128
Chemical Shift (ppm)

127

11899.5
11882.0
11863.7

16017.6
16010.3

16267.9
16260.6

136

126

7
125

124

123

11258.5
11251.9
11239.4
11232.8

(5)

F
152

145

150

119.0

118.5
118.0
117.5
Chemical Shift (ppm)

140
135
Chemical Shift (ppm)

130

112.0
111.5
Chemical Shift (ppm)

117.0

125

120

115

CDCl3

80.0
77.5
75.0
Chemical Shift (ppm)

100 MHz, CDCl3

136

F
1

134

133

132

131

130
129
128
Chemical Shift (ppm)

1
9

126

158

156
154
Chemical Shift (ppm)

155

150

152

145

150

119.0

118.5
118.0
117.5
Chemical Shift (ppm)

140
135
Chemical Shift (ppm)

130

125

125

124

123

112.0
111.5
Chemical Shift (ppm)

117.0

127

160

135

11899.5
11882.0
11863.7

16017.6
16010.3

16267.9
16260.6

160

11258.5
11251.9
11239.4
11232.8

Other Fluorine-Coupled Peaks. Carbon 9 is quite intense, especially for a peak that has a
splitting in it. It must be ortho to the fluorines. This is an AAXX system, where A and A are these
ortho carbons and X and X are the fluorinesthe carbons and fluorines are chemically equivalent
but magnetically inequivalent and therefore this is a second-order multiplet pattern. It is
reminiscent of an AB quartet. The coupling is approximately 6 Hz, but note that the line spacing
and the actual coupling no longer coincide directly for a second-order spectrum.
13102.7
13092.4
13082.2

(6)

120

115

CDCl3

80.0
77.5
75.0
Chemical Shift (ppm)

(7)

Other Fluorine-Coupled Peaks. The only other peak with coupling is 5, which must be the carbon
meta to the fluorines. The couplings are 2x10.3 Hz, which are right for an anti vicinal coupling.

13102.7
13092.4
13082.2

100 MHz, CDCl3

4
136

F
1

160

134

133

132

131

130
129
128
Chemical Shift (ppm)

127

2
N

1
9

158

156
154
Chemical Shift (ppm)

160

135

155

150

152

145

150

119.0

11899.5
11882.0
11863.7

16017.6
16010.3

16267.9
16260.6

118.5
118.0
117.5
Chemical Shift (ppm)

140
135
Chemical Shift (ppm)

130

125

125

124

123

112.0
111.5
Chemical Shift (ppm)

117.0

126

11258.5
11251.9
11239.4
11232.8

120

115

CDCl3

80.0
77.5
75.0
Chemical Shift (ppm)

Pyridine Ring. What remains is to assign carbons 4, 6, and 7. Here is where chemical shift
predictions come in handy again: they show that the carbon para to the pyridine nitrogen should
be the most downfield. But how can 6 and 7 be distinguished?

13102.7
13092.4
13082.2

100 MHz, CDCl3


predicted carbon-13 shifts

137.2

9
160

158

136

135

8
3

133

132

131

130
129
128
Chemical Shift (ppm)

127

126

125

124

123

156

154

155

134

5 Chemical1Shift (ppm)
F
9

160

149.2

F
8

120.8

4
1

11899.5
11882.0
11863.7

16017.6
16010.3

16267.9
16260.6

F 124.2
160.0 154.6
111.6
113.7 N
160.0
130.6
F
111.6

11258.5
11251.9
11239.4
11232.8

(8)

150

152

145

150

119.0

118.5
118.0
117.5
Chemical Shift (ppm)

140
135
Chemical Shift (ppm)

130

112.0
111.5
Chemical Shift (ppm)

117.0

125

120

115

CDCl3

80.0
77.5
75.0
Chemical Shift (ppm)

(9)

F
N

Pyridine Ring. Chemical shifts predict that 6 should be on the left and 7 should be on the right.
Examining an expansion reveals that 6 is much wider than 7, consistent with two unresolved,
small four-bond couplings to fluorine, confirming the predictions. This completes the assignment.

13102.7
13092.4
13082.2

100 MHz, CDCl3


predicted carbon-13 shifts

137.2

1
9

160

2
N

156
154
Chemical Shift (ppm)

152

150

134

133

132

131

155

150

145

127

119.0

118.5
118.0
117.5
Chemical Shift (ppm)
125.5

140
135
Chemical Shift (ppm)

130

125

124

123

112.0
111.5
Chemical Shift (ppm)

117.0

125.0

126

124.5
Chemical Shift (ppm)

130
129
128
Chemical Shift (ppm)

11258.5
11251.9
11239.4
11232.8

135

158

1
9

160

136

126.0

149.2

4
6

120.8

final answer

11899.5
11882.0
11863.7

16017.6
16010.3

16267.9
16260.6

F 124.2
160.0 154.6
111.6
113.7 N
160.0
130.6
F
111.6

125

124.0

120

123.5

115

123.0

CDCl3

80.0
77.5
75.0
Chemical Shift (ppm)

(10) Proton Spectrum. We wont bother interpreting this, but I just wanted to point out that although
the proton spectrum is very well resolved, it is a very complex series of partially overlapping
second-order multiplets due to the symmetry, and therefore magnetic inequivalence, of the
fluorines. (This compound came from a Pd-catalyzed cross-coupling of the difluorarylboronic acid
and the 2-chloropyridine, so the sample is more or less regioisomerically pure.
But a mixture of isomeric pyridines, for example, might look like total gibberish!)

F
N
F

400 MHz, CDCl3

1.0
8.7

1.0
8.6

8.5

8.4

8.3

8.2

8.1

8.0

7.9

7.8
7.7
7.6
Chemical Shift (ppm)

1.0
7.5

7.4

2.0
7.3

2.0
7.2

7.1

7.0

6.9

6.8

6.7

You might also like