You are on page 1of 14

CRNo.

42/14
LeoPuri&AnotherVs.SanjeevKr.Sharma
31.3.2015.
Present:

Revisionistno.2inpersonforherselfaswellasfor
hersoni.e.revisionistno.1.
Sh. B.R. Sharma, ld. counsel for respondent
complainant.
Heard.Perused.
Itappearsthatinadvertentlyinthepreviousorder

dated 28.2.2015, the Stenographer had wrongly mentioned


revisionist no. 2 in person for herself as well as her son i.e.
respondent no. 1 instead of mentioning revisionist no. 2 in
personforherselfaswellasforhersoni.e.revisionistno.1
andthesamebeaccordinglycorrectlyread.
Videpreviousorderdated3.3.2015,thematterwas
fixed for clarifications. However thereafter on 5.3.2015, the
revisionistno.2hadfiledaletteraddressedtothisCourt. On
specificquery,shehasstatedthatshedoesnotwantanyrelief
bymeansofthesaidletter. ThisCourthasgivenanoptionto
herthatifsheisnothavingtrustoverthisCourt,hermatter
may be referred to ld. District &Sessions Judge, South West
District, Dwarka Courts, Delhi, with request to transfer the
sametosomeotherCourt,towhichshehasrepliedthatshe
has complete trust over this Court and she does not want
transferofthismattertoanyotherCourt.Accordinglynoorder
Contd.........

::2::
isneededonheraforesaidletter.
She has further submitted that her counsel is
unabletoappeartodayandwillalsobeabletoappearinthe
monthofApril,thereforeadjournmentmaybegiven.
Accordinglylistforclarifications,for7.5.2015.

(ASHUTOSHKUMAR)
ASJ3:DWARKACOURTS:
DELHI:31.3.2015

CRNo.169/13
KalpanaYadavVs.State&Others
31.3.2015.
Present:

Sh. Mahender Singh Yadav, SPA and father of


revisionistcomplainant Kalpana Yadav, with ld.
counselSh.BhagirathDuharia.
Sh.V.K.Swami,ld.Addl.PPforState/respondent
no.1.
Noneforrespondentsno.2to5(proposedaccused
personsbeforetheld.TrialCourt).

Heard.Perused.
Sh.MahenderSinghYadav(SPAandfather ofthe
revisionistKalpanaYadav)hasstatedthatalldisputesbetween
thepartiesincludingthepresentdispute,havebeenamicably
settled in Mediation Centre, Hon'ble Delhi High Court, New
Delhi, and that the revisionist does not wish to pursue the
presentrevisionpetition.Hehasfiledphotocopyoforderdated
27.2.2015 of Hon'ble Delhi High Court in CS (OS) 1497/2013
andI.A.No.11969/2013,titledasKalpanaYadavVs.Dayanand
Yadav&Othersinthisregard. Hehasundertakenthatthe
revisionisthereinshallmoveappropriateapplicationbeforethe
ld.TrialCourtforwithdrawaloftheoriginalcomplaintcase.He
hasprayedthatthepresentrevisionpetitionmaybedismissed
as withdrawn. His separate statement to this effect has
recorded.
Contd.........

::2::
Inviewoftheaforesaid,thepresentrevisionpetition
isdismissedaswithdrawn.
AcopyofthisorderalongwithTCRbesentbackto
theld.Trial/SuccessorCourtfortodayitselfi.e.31.3.2015for
2.00pm,forfurtherproceedingsasperlaw.
Revisionpetitionfilebeconsignedtorecordroom.
AnnouncedintheopenCourton31.3.2015.

(ASHUTOSHKUMAR)
ASJ3:DWARKACOURTS:
DELHI:31.3.2015

M/sNareshTextilesVs.
M/sNavitasTextilesInternationalLtd.
31.3.2015.
Present:

Sh.AmitRay,ld.counselforrevisionistconvict.
Sh. Vivek Sharma, ld. counsel for respondent
complainant.
Heard.Perused.
Ld. counsel for revisionist seeks one last

opportunity for one month for making sincere efforts for


settlementbetweentheparties,whichisnotopposedbytheld.
counselforrespondent. Intheinterestofjustice,onelastand
finalopportunityisgrantedtotherevisionist.
List for settlement or in the alternative for
argumentsonrevisionpetition,for29.5.2015.
Boththepartiesaredirectedtoappearinpersonon
NDOH.

(ASHUTOSHKUMAR)
ASJ3:DWARKACOURTS:
DELHI:31.3.2015

CANo.58/14
MadhuMehraVs.State&Another
31.3.2015.
Present:

Sh.R.K.Sharma,ARandDy.Managerofapplicant
respondentno.2(complainantbeforetheld.Trial
Court),withld.counselMs.B.Kaur.
Sh.V.K.Swami,ld.Addl.PPforState/respondent
no.1.
Nonapplicant/appellant(convictbeforetheld.Trial
Court),withld.proxycounselMs.AkanshaGautam
formaincounselSh.L.M.Grover.

Heard.Perused.
Ld.counselforapplicant,aftertakinginstructions
fromtheAR,hasadmittedthatoutoftotalsettlementamount
ofRs.5.90lacs,asumofRs.5.31lacshasalreadybeenpaidto
theapplicantandthatthebalanceamountofRs.59,000/has
been paid by the nonapplicant by means of bank draft
(photocopyofsamekeptonrecord).
Atthisstage,afterinterventionoftheCourt,ARof
applicantrespondent no. 2 (complainant before the ld. Trial
Court)hasstatedthattheapplicantshallnotclaimtheinterest
for delayed payment towards settlement by the non
applicant/appellant(convictbeforetheld.TrialCourt)andwith
this all disputes between the parties stand settled. She has
accordingly prayed that their application for reopening the
appealmaybedismissedaswithdrawn.Separatestatementof
Contd.........

::2::
ARofapplicantwithregardtoaboverecorded.
In view of the aforesaid, the application for
reopening the appeal moved on behalf of the applicant
respondent no. 2 (complainant before the ld. Trial Court), is
dismissedaswithdrawn.
A copy of this order be sent back to the ld.
Trial/SuccessorCourtforinformation.
Appealfilebeconsignedtorecordroom.
AnnouncedintheopenCourton31.3.2015.

(ASHUTOSHKUMAR)
ASJ3:DWARKACOURTS:
DELHI:31.3.2015

CRNo.08/15
StatevsEdmostDanversCliffordII
31.3.2015
Present:

ShV.K.Swamild.Addl.P.PfortheState/revisionist.
Trialcourtrecordhasbeenreceived.
Notice of the revision petition issued to the

respondent,whoappearstobeUSnational,hasnotbeenproperly
served.AreporthasbeenreceivedthattheMHA/MEAneeds12
weeks'timeforserviceofnoticeinconcernedcountries.
Accordingly the respondent may be served again in
termsofpreviousorder.Theprocessbedeliveredintheconcerned
MinistrybytheIO/SHOconcerned.Theprocessbeissuedtoday
itself. Last opportunity is granted to the State to serve the said
respondent.
IssuenoticetotheIOforappearance.
List for arguments on the revision petition on
31.8.2015.
(AshutoshKumar)
ASJ03,DwarkaCourts,
31.3.2015

CRNo.12/15
SunitaMehravsMrs.UshaSharma&Ors.
31.3.2015
Present:

Revisionist complainant in person with ld. proxy


counselMs.KiranSainiformaincounselSh.Rajeev
Chhibber,Adv.
Ms. Tara Walmekar, Deputy Education Officer is
presentonbehalfofallthefourrespondentswithld.
counselSh.MayankSharma,whoundertakestofile
vakalatnamaonthenextdateofhearing.
Trialcourtrecordhasbeenreceived.
Heard.Perused.
Attherequestofld.counselforrespondentno.1to4

andinviewofthefactthatcompletecopiesofdocumentshavenot
been supplied, revisionist is directed to supply complete set of
documentstohimtodayitself.
List for arguments on the revision petition on
15.5.2015.
(AshutoshKumar)
ASJ03,DwarkaCourts,
31.3.2015

S.C.No04/12
FIRNo57/12
P.SDwarkaNorth
StateVs.RudraveshTanwar@Rubal&Others
31.3.2015
Present:

ShV.K.SwamildAddl.P.PfortheState.
AllfouraccusedpersonsnamelyRudraveshTanwar@
Rubal,SachinKr.Kadyan,ManeshKumar@Nishu
andDhruveshGoswami,@Dhruvareproducedfrom
JC.
Sh. Deepak Sharma, ld. counsel for accused
Rudravesh Tanwar@RubalandManeshKumar@
Nishu.
Sh. O.P.Sharma, ld. counsel for accused Dhruvesh
Goswami@Dhruv.
Sh.AnirudhYadav,ld.counselforaccusedSachinKr.
Kadyan.
ComplainantAshokKr.Garginpersonwithld.proxy
counselSh.ArjunHandaformaincounselSh.Amit
Khanna,Adv.
PW8 Kundan Kumar Datta is present for his cross

examination on behalf of Sh. Deepak Sharma, ld. counsel for


accusedRudraveshTanwar@RubalandManeshKumar@Nishu
pursuanttoallowingoftheirapplicationu/s.311CrPCvideorder
dated 30.3.2015. The cross examination of the said witness on
behalfofremainingaccusedpersonshasalreadybeenconducted.
Previous cost of Rs.500/ has been paid to the said witness on
behalfoftheaccusedpersons.
PW8recalledforfurthercrossexaminationonbehalf
of the said two accused persons and is cross examined and
discharged.
Contd...

Summons issued to PW Smt. Vijaylakshmi Mattoo,


Principal, Modern International School has been received back
unexecuted withthe reportthat shehaslefttheservicesof the
saidschool.Ld.Addl.P.P.fortheStatehasrequestedthatinstead
ofthesaidPW,theconcernedRecordClerkwithrelevantrecords
may be summoned. The request is opposed by ld. counsels for
accusedpersons.
Since the records sought to be produced are formal
records maintained by the said school in day to day of its
functioning and also the accused persons would get ample
opportunitytocrossexaminethesaidwitnessandfurthernonew
caseisbeingputforwardbytheprosecution,thereforetherequest
ofld.Addl.P.P.fortheStateisallowed.
The concerned Record Clerk of the said school with
relevant records be summoned for the next date of hearing for
prosecutionevidence.
PWConst.Sudhirisexemptedfortodayonlyinviewof
hiswrittenrequestwhereinitismentionedthatheisnotwell.
IOInspr.N.K.Jhapresenttodayisdischargedandis
directedtobepresentonthenextdate.
ListforRPEon18.5.2015,21.5.2015and22.5.2015.

(AshutoshKumar)
ASJ03,DwarkaCourts,
31.3.2015

DENo.02/14
DepartmentvsVidhyaBhushan
31.3.2015
Present:

Sh.AjayMehrol,PresentingOfficeronbehalfofthe
Department.
Sh.VidhyaBhushan,delinquentofficialispresent.
PWSanjeev,Orderlyisexemptedfortodaypursuantto

his written request on the ground that he would not be able to


attendthecourtashehadmetwithanaccidentacoupleofdays
back.
DW1Ms.Jyotiispresentforhercrossexamination.
However,delinquentofficialseeksadjournmentonthegroundthat
Sh.GurmukhSingh,DefenceAssistantisnotavailabletoday,as
heisbusyinsomeurgentworkinhisoffice.Accordinglythesaid
DWisdischargedunexaminedfortodayonlyandisbounddown
forthenextdate.
List for department evidence for 10.4.2015 at 02.00
pm.
(AshutoshKumar)
ASJ03,DwarkaCourts,
31.3.2015

S.C.No11/15
FIRNo929/07
P.SDwarka
StateVs.Pawanetc.
31.3.2015
The present Sessions case has been received on
transferfromthecourtofSh.VikasDhull,ld. ASJ01,Dwarka
Courts,Delhipursuanttoorderdated31.3.2015ofLd.District&
SessionsJudge(SouthWest),Delhi.Itbecheckedandregistered.
Present:

ShV.K.SwamildAddl.P.PfortheState.
AllthefouraccusedpersonsnamelyPawanKumar,
Daljeet Singh, Satbiro Devi and Kaptan Singh are
presentonbailwithld.proxycounselSh.Dhananjay
KaushalformaincounselSh.S.P.Kaushal,Adv.
Thecaseisfixedforfinalarguments.

However ld.

proxycounselforaccusedpersonshassoughtadjournment.
Accordingly list for final arguments for 30.4.2015.
Date is given at the request and convenience of ld. counsel for
accusedpersons.
(AshutoshKumar)
ASJ03,DwarkaCourts,
31.3.2015

S.C.No19/12
FIRNo172/10
P.SDwarka
StateVs.Ranjeet@Pahari@Others
31.3.2015
Present:

ShV.K.SwamildAddl.P.PfortheState.
AllthreeaccusedpersonsnamelyRanjeet@Pahari,
ChitranjanDas@ChittoandSunilKumararepresent
onbailwithld.proxycounselSh.AnilKumarformain
counselSh.DineshMudgil,Adv.
Todaythecaseisfixedforjudgment.However,some

clarificationsareneeded.
Asmaincounselforaccusedpersonsisnotavailable
today, the case is adjourned for clarifications/judgment for
07.4.2015at10.00am.
(AshutoshKumar)
ASJ03,DwarkaCourts,
31.3.2015

You might also like