Professional Documents
Culture Documents
5. Thereafter, on January 30, 2014 the SCN was served on the company by way of affixture at
its registered office address and one alternate address available on record. An opportunity of
personal hearing was granted to the company on May 13, 2014 and a notice in that regard
was sent to the registered office address of the Company on April 25, 2014 which was
returned undelivered. Thereafter, the notice to this effect was served on the company on
April 26, 2014 by way of affixture at its registered office address and another alternate
address. However the company chose not to appear for the personal hearing on the
scheduled date.
6. I note that sufficient opportunities to appear for hearing have been granted to the company
and it is not keen to avail the same. I further note that the company has not even filed any
written reply/submission to the SCN. In view of these facts and circumstances, I deem it
appropriate to decide the matter on the basis of material available on record.
7. I note that as on June 11, 2015 the company had not obtained SCORES authentication, as
required under SEBI circular dated August 13, 2012. I further note that as on June 11, 2015
all the investor complaints as indicated in SCN were pending against the company for
redressal. The details of five such complaints are mentioned in the following Table:
Details of the complaints
Sr.
no.
Complaint (New)
Registration No.
Nature of Complaint
Date of
Receipt
SEBIP/MH01/9114156/1
17/08/2001
SEBIP/MH11/0000935/1
03/06/2011
SEBIP/MH11/9102742/1
20/04/2011
SEBIP/MH12/0003893/1
Non-updation of address/signature
or correction, etc.
29/03/2012
SEBIP/MH12/0003893/2
Others
29/03/2012
8. I note that the investor complaints are pending unresolved since the year 2001. In addition
to the obligations under the provisions of Companies Act, 1956/2013, the company is also
under an obligation to redress all investor complaints in terms of the advice/directions of
SEBI, in view of the provisions of section 11 of the SEBI Act. However, the company has
not shown any tenacity in resolving the investor grievances and in spite of repeated advice
of SEBI, the said investor grievances are pending till date.
__________________________________________________________________________________
Order in respect of Shatrunjay Extrusions Limited
Page 2 of 3
9. Failure to redress investor grievances by a listed company adversely affects the confidence of
investors in the securities market. In view of the foregoing, I am of the view that it is a fit
case to issue appropriate directions under section 11B of the SEBI Act against the company
as contemplated in the SCN issued to it. I, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred
upon me under section 19 of the SEBI Act read with sections 11 and 11B thereof, hereby
restrain and prohibit Shatrunjay Extrusions Limited from accessing the securities market and
from buying, selling or dealing in securities, directly or indirectly, in whatsoever manner, till
it obtains SCORES authentication in terms of the SEBI circular dated August 13, 2012 and
resolves all the investor grievances pending against it. The aforesaid direction is without
prejudice to any other action that may be taken against the company and its directors in
accordance with law.
10. As the company is in default of filing Form DIN3 / Form 32 with the RoC, a copy of this Order
shall be forwarded to the RoC, Mumbai for information and action that may be deemed
appropriate in respect of failure of Shatrunjay Extrusions Limited.
11. This Order shall come into force with immediate effect. A copy of this Order shall also be
served upon the depositories and stock exchanges for necessary action.
__________________________________________________________________________________
Order in respect of Shatrunjay Extrusions Limited
Page 3 of 3