Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Diabetes Mellitus
BASIC INFORMATION
DEFINITION
Diabetes mellitus (DM) refers to a syndrome of
hyperglycemia resulting from many different
causes (see Etiology). It is broadly classified
into type 1 and type 2 DM. The terms insulindependent and noninsulin-dependent diabetes are obsolete because when a person
with type 2 diabetes needs insulin, he or she
remains labeled as type 2 and is not reclassified as type 1. Table 1-160 provides a general
comparison of the two types of DM.
The American Diabetes Association (ADA)
defines DM as follows:
C A fasting plasma glucose (FPG) 126 mg/
dl, which should be confirmed with repeat
testing on a different day. Fasting is defined
as no caloric intake for at least 8 hr.
C Symptoms of hyperglycemia and a casual (random) plasma glucose 200 mg/
dl. Classic symptoms of hyperglycemia
include polyuria, polydipsia, and unexplained weight loss.
C An oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) with a
plasma glucose 200 mg/dl 2 hr after a 75
g (100 g for pregnant women) glucose load.
C A hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) value 6.5%.
Individuals with glucose levels higher than
normal but not high enough to meet the
criteria for diagnosis of DM are considered to
have prediabetes, the diagnosis of which is
made as follows:
C A fasting plasma glucose 100 to 125 mg/
dl; this is referred to as impaired fasting
glucose.
C After OGTT, a 2-hr plasma glucose 140 to
199; this is referred to as impaired glucose
tolerance.
C A hemoglobin A1c value 5.7% to 6.4%.
SYNONYMS
IDDM (insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus)
NIDDM (noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus)
Type 1 diabetes mellitus (insulin-dependent
diabetes mellitus)
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (noninsulin-dependent
diabetes mellitus)
ICD-9CM CODES
250.0Diabetes mellitus (NIDDM)
250.1Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus
without complication (IDDM)
ICD-10CM CODES
E11.5Type 2 diabetes mellitus with
peripheral circulatory complications
E11.6Type 2 diabetes mellitus with other
specified complications
E11.7Type 2 diabetes mellitus with multiple
complications
E11.8Type 2 diabetes mellitus with
unspecified complications
E11.9Type 2 diabetes mellitus without
complications
EPIDEMIOLOGY &
DEMOGRAPHICS
DM affects 9% to 10% of the U.S. population.
Prevalence rates vary considerably by race/
ethnicity.
Incidence rate increases with age, varying
from 2% in persons age 20 to 44 yr to 18%
in persons 65 to 74 yr. Type 2 DM can have
a long presymptomatic phase, leading to a
4- to 7-yr delay in diagnosis.
Diabetes accounts for 8% of all legal
blindness in the United States and is the
leading cause of end-stage renal disease
(ESRD).
Previous terminology
Age of onset
Genetic predisposition
Human leukocyte antigen
associations
Other associations
Precipitating and risk factors
Findings at diagnosis
Endogenous insulin levels
Insulin resistance
Prolonged fast
Stress, withdrawal of insulin
Type 1
Type 2
85%-90% of patients have one and usually more autoantibodies to ICA512/IA-2/IA-2b, GAD65, insulin (IAA)
Low or absent
Only with hyperglycemia
Hyperglycemia, ketoacidosis
Ketoacidosis
Strong; 60%-90% concordance in monozygotic twins; many candidate genes proposed; some genes identified in maturity-onset
diabetes of the young
None known
Heterogenous group, ongoing subclassification based on identification of specific pathogenic processes and genetic defects
Age, obesity (central), sedentary lifestyle, previous gestational
diabetes
Possibly complications (microvascular and macrovascular) caused
by significant preceding asymptomatic period
Usually present (relative deficiency), early hyperinsulinemia
Mostly present
Euglycemia
Nonketotic hyperglycemia, occasionally ketoacidosis
GAD, Glutamic acid decarboxylase; IA-2/IA-2b, tyrosine phosphatases; IAA, insulin autoantibodies; ICA, islet cell antibody; ICA512, islet cell autoantigen 512 (fragment of IA-2).
From Andreoli TE (ed): Cecil essentials of medicine, ed 6, Philadelphia, 2005, Saunders.
<140 mg/dl
140-199 mg/dl
200 mg/dl
Normal
IFG
DM
<5.7%
Normal
IGT
DM
DM
DM
6.5%
DM
(2)
Genitourinary (GU) disturbances:
neurogenic bladder (hesitancy, weak
stream, and dribbling), impotence
(3)
Cardiovascular (CV) disturbances:
orthostatic hypotension, tachycardia,
decreased heart rate variability (HRV).
Decreased heart rate variability is associated with increased cardiac mortality,
independent of ejection fraction.
c. Polyradiculopathy: painful weakness and
atrophy in the distribution of 1 contiguous nerve roots.
d. Mononeuropathy involving cranial nerves III,
IV, or VI or peripheral nerves can also occur.
5. Diabetic nephropathy: pedal edema, pallor,
weakness, uremic appearance
6. Foot ulcers: occur in 15% of individuals with
diabetes (annual incidence rate 2%) and are
the leading causes of hospitalization; they are
usually secondary to a combination of factors,
including peripheral vascular insufficiency,
repeated trauma (unrecognized because of
sensory loss), and superimposed infection.
a. Patient symptoms are usually less than
would be expected from clinical findings,
due to loss of sensation related to peripheral neuropathy.
b. Comprehensive foot exams include visual
inspection, assessment of pedal pulses, and
assessment of protective sensation using
a 10-g monofilament to test sensation.
c. Prevention of foot ulcers in an individual
with diabetes includes strict glucose
control, patient education, prescription
ETIOLOGY
IDIOPATHIC DIABETES:
Type 1 DM: results from beta-cell destruction,
usually leading to absolute insulin deficiency
Hereditary factors:
1.
Islet cell antibodies (found in 90% of
patients within the first yr of diagnosis)
2.
Higher incidence of human leukocyte
antigen (HLA) types DR3, DR4
3. 50% concordance rate in identical twins
Environmental factors: viral infection (possibly Coxsackie virus, mumps virus)
Type 2 DM: results from insulin resistance
and a progressive defect in insulin secretion.
Hereditary factors: 90% concordance rate in
identical twins
Environmental factors: obesity, sedentary
lifestyle, high carbohydrate content in food
DIABETES SECONDARY TO OTHER FACTORS:
Hormonal excess: Cushings syndrome, acromegaly, glucagonoma, pheochromocytoma
Drugs: glucocorticoids, diuretics, oral contraceptives
Insulin receptor unavailability (with or without
circulating antibodies)
Pancreatic disease: pancreatitis, pancreatectomy, hemochromatosis, cystic fibrosis
Genetic syndromes: maturity onset diabetes
of the young (MODY, monogenetic diabetes
accounting for 2% to 5% of diabetes), familial
hyperlipidemias, myotonic dystrophy, lipoatrophy
Gestational diabetes (GDM): diabetes diagnosed during pregnancy that is due to pregnancy-related insulin resistance
Dx DIAGNOSIS
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
Diabetes insipidus
Stress hyperglycemia
Diabetes secondary to hormonal excess,
drugs, pancreatic disease
LABORATORY TESTS
Diagnosis of DM is made on the basis of the
following tests:
1. Fasting glucose 126 mg/dl on two occasions
2. Non-FPG 200 mg/dl and symptoms of DM
3. OGTT (75-g glucose load for nonpregnant
individuals) with 2-hr value >200 mg/dl
4. Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) 6.5%
Diseases
and Disorders
*These diagnostic categories are based on the combined fasting plasma glucose level and a 2-hour, 75-g oral glucose tolerance
test (OGTT) result. Note that a confirmed random plasma glucose level of 200 mg/dl or higher in the appropriate clinical setting is diagnostic of diabetes and precludes the need for further testing.
May be referred to as prediabetes.
DM, Diabetes mellitus; IFG, impaired fasting glucose; IGT. impaired glucose tolerance.
From Goldman L, Schafer AI: Goldmans Cecil medicine, ed 24, Philadelphia, 2012, Saunders.
370
Diabetes Mellitus
Rx TREATMENT
Type 1 diabetes requires immediate initiation
of insulin therapy.
The ADA and European Association for the
Study of Diabetes recommend lifestyle intervention (diet and exercise) and metformin initiation (unless contraindication such as renal
failure) at the time of diagnosis of type 2
diabetes. Therapy should then be augmented
with additional agents (including early initiation of insulin therapy) to achieve adequate
glycemic control.
In Type 1 diabetes, intensive glycemic control
(HbA1c <7) has been shown in randomized
controlled trials (RCT) to reduce the risk
of microvascular (neuropathy, retinopathy,
nephropathy) and macrovascular (cardiovascular events) complications.
In Type 2 diabetes, intensive glycemic control (HbA1c <7) has been shown in RCT
to reduce the risk of microvascular complications. While intensive glucose control
reduced the risk of some cardiovascular
disease outcomes (such as nonfatal MI), it did
not reduce the risk of cardiovascular death or
all cause mortality and increased the risk of
severe hypoglycemia.
It is important to remember that tight glycemic control may burden patients with complex
treatment programs, hypoglycemia, weight
gain, and costs. Clinicians should individualize
HbA1c targets so that they are reasonable and
reflect patients personal and clinical contexts
and their informed values and preferences. A
target HbA1c >7 is reasonable for motivated
new diabetic patients with long life expectancies, whereas less stringent controls (HbA1c
7.5 or higher) may be reasonable in elderly
patients with limited life expectancy and
elevated risk of hypoglycemia.
NONPHARMACOLOGIC THERAPY
1. Diet
a. Calories
(1)
The patient with diabetes can be
started on 15 calories/lb of ideal body
weight; this number can be increased
to 20 calories/lb for an active person
and 25 calories/lb if the patient does
heavy physical labor.
(2) The calories should be distributed as
45% to 65% carbohydrates, <30%
fat, with saturated fat limited to <7%
of total calories, and 10% to 30% protein. Daily cholesterol intake should
not exceed 300 mg.
(3) The emphasis should be on complex
carbohydrates rather than simple and
refined starches, and on polyunsaturated instead of saturated fats in a
ratio of 2:1.
b. Seven food groups
(1) The exchange diet of the ADA includes
bread or starches, meat or proteins,
vegetables, fruits, fats, milk, and free
foods (e.g., black tea, sugar-free
gelatin).
(2) The name of each exchange is meant
to be all-inclusive (e.g., cereal, muffins, spaghetti, potatoes, rice are in
the bread group; meats, fish, eggs,
cheese, peanut butter are in the protein group).
(3)
The glycemic index compares the
increase in blood sugar after the
ingestion of simple sugars and complex carbohydrates with the increase
that occurs after the absorption of
glucose; equal amounts of starches
do not give the same increase in
plasma glucose (pasta equal in calories to a baked potato causes less of
an increase than the potato); thus, it is
helpful to know the glycemic index of
a particular food product.
(4) Fiber: Insoluble fiber (bran, celery) and
soluble globular fiber (pectin in fruit)
delay glucose absorption and attenu-
Glinides
Exenatide Pramlintide
Liver
Gut
Muscle
Beta cell
Various
Brain
1-2
0.5-1
0.5-2
0.5
Good
Good
Poor
Poor
Poor
Excellent
Good
Good
Excellent
Excellent
Excellent
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
bid or tid
bid to qid
bid
tid
0 to 10
Modest
decrease
Minimal
decrease
None
Property
Lifestyle Insulins
Target tissue
Muscle or
fat
Variable
Beta cell
Beta cell
supplement
1->2
1-2
Good
Excellent
Good
No
HbA1c (%) as
(monotherapy)
Fasting effect
Postprandial
effect
Severe hypoglycemia
Dosing interval
Weight (lb/yr)
Insulin
LDL
HDL
TG
Common problem
Rare problem
Contraindications
Cost ($/mo)
Maximum effective dose
Sulfonylureas Metformin
Continuous qd to
qd to tid
continuous
+1
+3
+1 to 3
Variable
Increase
Increase
Minimal
decrease
Minimal
increase
Minimal
decrease
Recidivism,
injury
None
Minimal
decrease
None
None
0 to 6
Modest
decrease
Decrease
None
Increase
Decrease
None
Decrease
0-200
30-450
1-2U/kg per
day
Hypoglycemia, Hypoglycemia,
weight gain
weight gain
None
Allergy
10-15
maximum or
double starting
Transient GI
Minimal
decrease
Flatulence
Lactic acidosis
Renal failure,
Intestinal
Liver failure,
disease
CHF (>80yr old)
30-60
40-80
1000mg bid
50mg tid
Re: 1-2
N: 0.5-1
Good
Re: Moderate
N: Poor
Good
Re: Good
N: Excellent
No
Re: Yes
N: No
P: qd Ro: qd or bid tid to qid with
meals
+1 to 13
+1 to 3
Decrease
Increase
6 to 12 3 to 6
Increase
None
Increase
None
None
None
Increase
None
Decrease
None
P: Decrease Ro:
None
Weight gain,
edema, anemia
Hepatotoxicity?
Hepatocellular
disease
None
Decrease
None
Hypoglycemia
GI
GI
None
None
70-110
Re: 2mg tid
N: 120mg tid
170-200
10g bid
200-400
120g ac
75-180
P: 45mg qd
Ro: 4mg bid
, Change; ac, before food; CHF, congestive heart failure; GI, gastrointestinal disturbance; HbA1c, glycosylated hemoglobin; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; N, nateglinide; P, pioglitazone; Re, repaglinide; Ro, rosiglitazone; TG, triglycerides.
From Melmed S, Polonsky KS, Larsen PR, Kronenberg HM: Williams textbook of endocrinology, ed 12, Philadelphia, 2011, Saunders.
Diseases
and Disorders
GENERAL Rx
When the previous measures fail to normalize
the serum glucose, oral hypoglycemic agents
should be added to the regimen in type 2 DM.
Tables 1-163 and 1-164 compare therapies
for type 2 DM and classes of antihyperglycemic agents.
The primary mechanism of metformin is to
decrease hepatic glucose production and
improve insulin sensitivity. Because metformin does not produce hypoglycemia when
used as a monotherapy, it is preferred initially
for most patients. Metformin reduces mean
HbA1c level by 1.1 %. It is contraindicated in
patients with severe renal insufficiency with
an estimated glomerular filtrate rate <30 ml/
min, heart failure, or other clinical states of
hypoperfusion, and in patients with significant liver disease.
Sitagliptin, saxagliptin, vildagliptin, and linagliptin inhibit the enzyme DPP-4, responsible
for inactivation and degradation of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-
dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP).
These drugs, known as gliptins, raise blood
incretin levels, thereby inhibiting glucagon
372
HbA1c
Lowering
(%)
Usual Dosing
Fasting or
Frequency
Prandial Effect (Doses/Day)
Route
Hypoglycemia
Weight
Effect
Important
Contraindications Daily Cost ($)
Lifestyle
Biguanide
Metformin
Broad
Liver sensitizer
>1
>1
Both
Fasting
1-2
Oral
No
No
Loss
Neutral
Yes
Modest
<$1
Sulfonylurea
Glimepiride,
glipizide
Repaglinide
Insulin
secretagogue
Insulin
secretagogue
Insulin
secretagogue
Insulin supplement/
substitute
Insulin supplement/
substitute
Peripheral sensitizer
>1
Fasting
1-2
Oral
Yes
Gain
Negligible
Renal or hepatic
failure
>1
Both
With meals
Oral
Yes
Gain
Negligible
$5
<1
Prandial
With meals
Oral
Minimal
Minimal
Negligible
$5
>1
Fasting
SQ
Yes++
Gain++
Lowers TG
$5
>1
Prandial
With meals
SQ
Yes++
Gain++
Lowers TG
$5
>1
Fasting
Oral
No
Gain++
$5
<1
Prandial
With meals
Oral
No
Neutral
Negligible
$3
Pramlintide
Exenatide
Slow carbohydrate
absorption
Broad
Broad
<1
1
Prandial
Prandial
With meals
2
SQ
SQ
No
No
Loss
Loss
Broad
>1
Both
SQ
No
Loss
Pancreatitis, renal
failure
Pancreatitis, medullary thyroid cancer
$10
$9
Liraglutide
Negligible
Modest with weight
loss
Lowers BP
Sitagliptin,
saxagliptin
Colesevelam
Improved insulin/
glucagon secretion
Uncertain
<1
Both
Oral
No
Neutral
Negligible
Pancreatitis
$7
<1
Prandial
1-2
Oral
No
Neutral
Lowers LDL
Hypertriglyceridemia
$9
Bromocriptine
Uncertain
<1
Fasting
Oral
No
Neutral
Modest
NA
Meglitinide
Benzoic acid
derived
Basal insulin
Bolus insulin
Thiazolidinediones
-Glucosidase
inhibitors
Amylinomimetics
GLP1 receptor
agonists
Long-acting GLP1
receptor
agonists
DPP4 inhibitors
Bile acid
sequestrants
Dopamine
agonists
Nateglinide
NPH, glargine,
detemir
R, lispro, aspart,
glulisine
Pioglitazone, rosiglitazone
Acarbose, miglitol
BP, Blood pressure; CVD, cardiovascular disease; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; SQ, subcutaneous; TG, triglyceride.
From Melmed S, Polonsky KS, Larsen PR, Kronenberg HM: Williams textbook of endocrinology, ed 12, Philadelphia, 2011, Saunders.
<<$1
$13
Class
Representative
Agents
Major Action
Diabetes Mellitus
Brand
Onset (hr)b
Peak (hr)
Duration (hr)c
Route
Insulin Aspart
Insulin Aspart
Protamine/Insulin
Aspart
Insulin Detemir
Insulin Glargine
Insulin Glulisine
Insulin Lispro
Insulin Lispro
Protamine/Insulin
Lispro
Insulin Injection
Regular (R)
NovoLogd
NovoLog Mix 70/30d
<0.25
<0.25
1-3
1-4
3-5
24
Levemire
Lantusd
Apidrad
Humalogd
Humalog Mix 75/25d
Humalog Mix 50/50d
1
1.1
0.25
<0.25
0.25
0.25
None
None
1
1
0.5-1.5
1
24
24
2-4
3.5-4.5
24
16
SC
SC
SC, IV
SC
SC
SC
Humulin Rf
Novolin Ne
Humulin 70/30f
Humulin 50/50f
Novolin 70/30e
Humulin Nf
Novolin Ne
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1-2
1.5
2-4
2.5-5
2-12
3-5
2-12
6-12
4-12
6-8
8
24
24
24
18-24
24
SC, IM, IV
SC, IM, IV
SC
SC
SC
SC
SC
Insulin Isophane
Suspension (NPH)/
Regular Insulin (R)
Insulin Isophane
Suspension (NPH)
aInjectable
insulins listed are available in a concentration of 100 U/ml; Humulin R, in a concentration of 500 U/ml for SC
injection. SC injection only is available by prescription from Lilly for insulin-resistant patients who are hospitalized or in
need of medical supervision.
bOnset for injectable formulations is always for the subcutaneous (SC) route. All times are approximate.
cMaximum effect occurs between these times; actual effect may last longer.
dRecombinant human insulin analogue (using E. coli).
eRecombinant (using S. cerevisiae).
fRecombinant (using E. coli).
CSII, Continuous subcutaneous infusion; IM, intramuscularly; IV, intravenously.
DISPOSITION
Diabetic retinopathy occurs in nearly 15% of
patients with diabetes after 15 yr of diagnosis
and increases 1%/yr after diagnosis. Retinal
laser photocoagulation and vitrectomy are
effective treatment modalities. Prevention
is best accomplished by strict glucose and
BP control. Early blockade of the reninangiotensin system has been shown to slow
progression of retinopathy in patients with
type 1 diabetes.
The frequency of neuropathy in patients
with type 2 diabetes approaches 70% to
80%. It can be subdivided into sensorimotor neuropathy and autonomic neuropathy.
Duloxetine, a selective serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, is effective and
FDA approved for relief of diabetic peripheral
neuropathy. Pregabalin and gabapentin (900
to 3600 mg/day) are also effective for the
symptomatic treatment of peripheral neuropathic pain. Topical capsaicin, 5% lidocaine
transdermal patches, amitriptyline, and carbamazepine are also modestly effective.
Diabetic gastroparesis is most often seen in
patients who have had diabetes for at least
10 yr and typically have retinopathy, neuropathy, and nephropathy. Major manifestations
are postprandial fullness, nausea, vomiting, and bloating. Pharmacologic therapy
involves prokinetic agents (metoclopramide).
Endoscopic injection of botulinum toxin into
the pylorus and gastric electrical stimulation
(using f electrodes placed laparoscopically
in the muscle wall of the stomach antrum
and connected to a neurostimulator) represent newer approaches to nonpharmacologic
therapy.
Nephropathy: The first sign of renal involvement in patients with DM is most often
microalbuminuria, which is classified as
incipient nephropathy. Before the current
period of intensive glycemic control and
blood pressure with ACE inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockade, it was suggested
that 25% to 45% of diabetic patients would
develop clinically evident renal disease (pro-
Diseases
and Disorders
374
Diabetes Mellitus
REFERRAL
Patients with diabetes should be advised to
have annual ophthalmologic examinations.
In type 1 DM, ophthalmologic visits should
begin within 3 to 5 yr of diagnosis, whereas
type 2 DM patients should be seen from
disease onset.
Podiatric care can significantly reduce the
rate of foot infections and amputations in
patients with DM. Noninfected neuropathic
foot ulcers require debridement and reduction of pressure.
Nephrology consultation in all cases of
proteinuria, hyperkalemia, uncontrolled BP,
and when GFR has decreased to <30 ml/
min/1.73 m2.
PEARLS &
CONSIDERATIONS
COMMENTS
Because normalization of serum glucose
level is the ultimate goal, every patient with
diabetes should measure his or her blood
glucose with commercially available glucometers unless contraindicated by senility or
blindness.
Underinsured children and those with psychiatric illness are at greater risk for acute complications in type 1 DM and require frequent
monitoring and aggressive risk management
with diet, exercise, and periodic laboratory
evaluation.
Significant sustained weight loss using bariatric surgery has been reported as effective
in achieving remission of type 2 diabetes in
morbidly obese patients. Bariatric surgery
may be considered for adults with BMI
>35 kg/m2 and type 2 DM, especially if
diabetes or associated comorbidities are
difficult to control with lifestyle and pharmacologic therapy.
SUGGESTED READINGS
available at www.expertconsult.com
RELATED CONTENT
Diabetic Ketoacidosis (Related Key Topic)
Diabetic Polyneuropathy (Related Key Topic)
Diabetic Retinopathy (Related Key Topic)
Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (Related Key
Topic)
Hyperosmolar Hyperglycemic Syndrome
(Related Key Topic)
Diabetes Mellitus Type 1 (Patient Information)
Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 (Patient Information)
AUTHORS: HILARY B. WHITLATCH, M.D., SAINATH
GADDAM, M.D., and FRED F. FERRI, M.D.
Diabetes Mellitus
EVIDENCE
Abstract[1]
Background:
The role of weight training in the primary prevention of type 2 diabetes
mellitus (T2DM) is largely unknown.
Methods:
To examine the association of weight training with risk of T2DM in US
men and to assess the influence of combining weight training and aerobic exercise, we performed a prospective cohort study of 32,002 men
from the Health Professionals Follow-up Study observed from 1990 to
2008. Weekly time spent on weight training and aerobic exercise (including brisk walking, jogging, running, bicycling, swimming, tennis, squash,
and calisthenics/rowing) was obtained from questionnaires at baseline
and biennially during follow-up.
Results:
During 508 332 person-years of follow-up (18 years), we documented
2278 new cases of T2DM. In multivariable-adjusted models, we observed a dose-response relationship between an increasing amount of
time spent on weight training or aerobic exercise and lower risk of T2DM
(P < .001 for trend). Engaging in weight training or aerobic exercise for at
least 150 minutes per week was independently associated with a lower
risk of T2DM of 34% (95% CI, 7%-54%) and 52% (95% CI, 45%-58%),
respectively. Men who engaged in aerobic exercise and weight training
for at least 150 minutes per week had the greatest reduction in T2DM
risk (59%; 95% CI, 39%-73%).
Conclusions:
Weight training was associated with a significantly lower risk of T2DM,
independent of aerobic exercise. Combined weight training and aerobic
exercise conferred a greater benefit. A
Abstract[2]
Background:
Physical activity (PA) is considered a cornerstone of diabetes mellitus
management to prevent complications, but conclusive evidence is lacking.
Methods:
This prospective cohort study and meta-analysis of existing studies investigated the association between PA and mortality in individuals with
diabetes. In the EPIC study (European Prospective Investigation Into Cancer and Nutrition), a cohort was defined of 5859 individuals with diabetes at baseline. Associations of leisure-time and total PA and walking
with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and total mortality were studied using
multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models. Fixed- and
random-effects meta-analyses of prospective studies published up to
December 2010 were pooled with inverse variance weighting.
Results:
In the prospective analysis, total PA was associated with lower risk of CVD
and total mortality. Compared with physically inactive persons, the lowest
mortality risk was observed in moderately active persons: hazard ratios
were 0.62 (95% CI, 0.49-0.78) for total mortality and 0.51 (95%CI, 0.320.81) for CVD mortality. Leisure-time PA was associated with lower total
mortality risk, and walking was associated with lower CVD mortality risk. In
the meta-analysis, the pooled random-effects hazard ratio from 5 studies for
high vs low total PA and all-cause mortality was 0.60 (95% CI, 0.49-0.73).
Conclusions:
Higher levels of PA were associated with lower mortality risk in individuals with diabetes. Even those undertaking moderate amounts of activity
were at appreciably lower risk for early death compared with inactive
persons. These findings provide empirical evidence supporting the widely shared view that persons with diabetes should engage in regular PA. A
Evidence-Based References
1. Grntved A, Rimm EB, Willett WC etal: A prospective study of weight training and
risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus in men, Arch Intern Med 172:1306-1312, 2012. A
2. Sluik D, Buijsse B, Muckelbauer R etal: Physical activity and mortality in
individuals with diabetes mellitus: a prospective study and meta-analysis, Arch
Intern Med 172:1285-1295, 2012. A
374.e1
SUGGESTED READINGS
American Diabetes Association Position Statement: Standards of medical care in
diabetes-2010, Diabetes Care 33:S1, January 2010.
Balducci J etal: Effect of an intensive exercise intervention strategy on modifiable cardiovascular risk factors in subjects with type 2 DM, Arch Intern Med
170(20):1794-1803, 2010.
Culver A etal: Statin use and risk of diabetes mellitus in postmenopausal women
in the Womens Health Initiative, Arch Intern Med 172(2):144-152, 2012.
Esposito K etal: Effects of a Mediterranean-style diet on the need for antihyperglycemic drug therapy in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes, Ann
Intern Med 151:306-314, 2009.
Fried LF etal: Combined angiotensin inhibition for the treatment of diabetic
nephropathy, N Engl J Med 369:1892-1903, 2013.
Inzucchi SE: Diagnosis of diabetes, N Engl J Med 367:542-550, 2012.
Inzucchi SE: Management of hyperglycemia in the hospital setting, N Engl J Med
355:1903, 2006.
Inzucchi SE etal: Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: a patientcentered approach. Position statement of the American Diabetes Association
and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes, Diabetes Care
35:1364, 2012.
Kanji JN etal: Does this patient with diabetes have large-fiber peripheral neuropathy, JAMA 303:1526-1532, 2010.
Kavanagh BP, McCowen KC: Glycemic control in the ICU, N Engl J Med 363:25402546, 2010.
Kelly TN: Systematic review: Glucose control and cardiovascular disease in type 2
diabetes, Ann Intern Med 151:394-403, 2009.
Mauer M etal: Renal and retinal effects of enalapril and losartan in type 1 diabetes, N Engl J Med 361:40-51, 2009.
Montori V, Fernandez-Balsells M: Glycemic control in type 2 diabetes: time for an
evidence-based about-face? Ann Intern Med 150:803-808, 2009.
Mooradian A etal: Narrative review: a rational approach to starting insulin therapy,
Ann Intern Med 145:125, 2006.
Nauck M: Incretin-based therapies for type 2 diabetes mellitus: properties, functions, and clinical implications, Am J Med 124:S3-S18, 2011.
OHare A etal: Prognostic implications of the urinary albumin to creatinine ratio
in veterans of different ages with diabetes, Arch Intern Med 170(11):930-936,
2010.
Petnick A: Insulin management of type 2 diabetes mellitus, Am Fam Phys
84(2):183-190, 2011.
Pickup JC: Insulin-pump therapy for type 1 diabetes mellitus, N Engl J Med
366:1616-1624, 2012.
Pignone M etal: Aspirin for primary prevention of cardiovascular events in people
with diabetes: a position statement of the American Diabetes Association, a
scientific statement of the American Heart Association, and an expert consensus document of the American College of Cardiology Foundation, Circulation
121:2694, 2010.
Qaseem A etal: Use of intensive insulin therapy for the management of glycemic
control in hospitalized patients: a clinical practice guideline from the American
College of Physicians, Ann Intern Med 154:260-267, 2011.
Rejeski WJ etal: Lifestyle change and mobility in obese adults with type 2 diabetes, N Engl J Med 366:1209-1217, 2012.
Ripsin CM etal: Management of blood glucose in type 2 diabetes mellitus, Am
Fam Phys 79(1):29-36, 2009.
The DCCT/EDIC Research Group: Intensive diabetes therapy and glomerular filtration rate in type 1 diabetes, N Engl J Med 365:2366, 2011.
The Task Force on Diabetes and Cardiovascular Diseases of the European Society
of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes
(EASD): Guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular disease:
executive summary, Eur Heart J 28:88-136, 2007.
Yeh HC etal: Smoking, smoking cessation, and risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus,
Ann Intern Med 152:10-17, 2010.
Diabetes Mellitus
374.e2
FIGURE E1-312 Necrobiosis lipoidica: symmetrical early lesions with erythema. (Courtesy of the
Institute of Dermatology; from McKee PH etal [eds]: Pathology of the skin with clinical correlations, ed 3, St
Louis, 2005, Mosby.)
Diabetes proteinuria
Atypical proteinuria
Type 1 diabetes for 10 years
No retinopathy
Nephrotic range proteinuria
without progression through
microalbuminuria
Macroscopic hematuria
Red cell casts
Atypical
Azotemia with proteinuria 1 g/day
Papillary necrosis (pyuria,
hematuria, scarring)
Tuberculosis (pyuria, hematuria)
Renovascular disease (other
occlusive vascular disease)
No renal biopsy
Renal biopsy
No renal biopsy
FIGURE E1-313 Clinical evaluation of diabetic renal disease. ANCA, Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody. (From Floege J etal: Comprehensive clinical nephrology,
ed 4, Philadelphia, 2010, Saunders.)