Professional Documents
Culture Documents
339
340
A. McCloskey et al.
Virtual Lab. The results given by the acoustic numerical model are compared with
sound power measurements.
Keywords Electric motors
magnetic noise
Noise
Vibrations
Forced response
Electro-
1 Introduction
The increasing use of inverters has introduced more excitation harmonics which
originate vibration and noise problems. Noise and vibration have a direct inuence
on users perception of quality and comfort. Nowadays, in order to reduce costs, the
efciency of the machine needs to be improved and thus, the geometry of the stator
needs to be optimised, being the vibration behaviour a restriction, as some geometry
modications can lead to unacceptable vibrations.
Noise and vibration in electric motors have different origins that can be classied
into three groups:
Electromagnetic noise: Originated by magnetic forces acting on the stator and
rotor.
Mechanical noise: Originated by bearings, shaft misalignment
Aerodynamic noise: Originated by the cooling fan.
The contribution of these sources changes depending on the working conditions.
In the analysed case, due to the absence of a fan, the aerodynamic noise does not
exist. According to Gieras et al. [2] and Timar and Lai [6], mechanical and aerodynamical noises increase with speed. However, Timar and Lai [6] afrm that in the
very-low-speed domain mechanical and electromagnetic noises are present. Other
authors as Kawasaki et al. [3] assess thatnoise below 1,000 Hz is due to radial
electromagnetic excitation and, according to Lakshmikanth et al. [4], the electromagnetic is the dominating source in low-medium power machines. As in the
analysed machine the rotational speed is low, for a healthy machine mechanical
noise should be low, so just electromagnetic noise will be calculated.
For this task a structural nite element model needs to be developed, which will
be validated by experimental modal analysis (EMA).
In order to model the electric motor some modelling issues need to be overcome.
First, the laminated stator presents different stiffness values in radial and axial
directions, according to Gieras et al. [2], Verdyck and Belmans [7] and Wang and
Lai [8], as it is formed by a pack of several steel sheets. Thus, orthotropic material
properties are applied to the solid part representing the laminated stator. It is hard to
determine those properties the stiffness depends on the compression pressure acting
in the axial direction (Wang and Williams [9] and Watanabe et al. [10]) during
manufacturing and on the procedure used to tie the pack of steel sheets and,
therefore, they are adjusted according to the experimental results.
341
Then, different modelling strategies are found in literature for the windings.
Belmans et al. [1] and Wang and Lai [8] consider that the mass supplement due to
windings is more important than the supplementary stiffness, so windings are
treated as additional masses. However, it is hard to know if this strategy might be
applicable for any stator geometry. So according to Gieras et al. [2], the volume of
material representing the stator windings, which lls the slots of the stator, is also
modelled as a solid part. Its orthotropic properties are again estimated according to
the experimental modal analysis results.
When more parts are added, the junctions have to be modelled. Initially screwed
parts are considered strongly joined so that contact surfaces of both parts are glued.
In the case of the rotor, which is supported by bearings, the junction is modelled
introducing radial springs where the bearings are placed.
2 Experimental Analysis
2.1 Modal Testing Set-Up and Procedure
The modal testing equipment consists on:
Acquisition system: two Brel and Kjaer Front-ends and laptop with Pulse
Labshop software.
Impact hammer.
10 triaxial accelerometers.
The system is elastically suspended by rubber bands to avoid the effect of
constraints in the natural modes of the system.
For each analysed system a different spatial discretisation is used resulting in
different number and position of measurement points. The analysed components
are:
Laminated stator.
Laminated stator and windings.
Laminated stator, windings and end-shields assembly.
Rotor and shaft assembly.
The previous two assemblies mounted with the corresponding bearings.
The last assembly (stator, rotor and end-shields) is used to analyse the behaviour
of the bearings and their stiffness. Therefore, the modes of the rotor shaft system
constrained by the stator need to be measured and thus, it is necessary to measure
the acceleration in different points of the shaft. Because of this, other elements as
the brake are not included in this system, as they block the way to the shaft, making
impossible to place accelerometers on it.
342
A. McCloskey et al.
343
344
A. McCloskey et al.
These two parts are screwed to the stator and it is considered that this join is
strong enough to be modelled, as if the contact surface pair were welded. The
material of these two parts is the grey cast iron EN-GJL-250 (GG-25) and, applied
its mechanical properties, the biggest relative error for this model is around 5 %.
345
346
A. McCloskey et al.
Fig. 7 Acceleration in mm/s2 in the center of the stator, in vertical direction (normal to the
surface) comparison, simulated versus experimental
347
6 Conclusion
The rst conclusion is that, as it was observed in the literature, the main modelling
issue is to determine the mechanical properties of the laminated components as the
stator and the rotor and specially the windings. In the case of the laminated stator
and rotor the values of some material properties found at the literature may give
good agreement with the experimental behaviour. However, there are many
348
A. McCloskey et al.
different windings topologies and sizes and, thus, it is hard to establish generally
applicable mechanical properties for this part. To ensure accurate natural frequencies the strategy of modelling the windings as a solid orthotropic part should
be followed adjusting its mechanical properties according to the experimental
results.
The interaction between different parts is another modelling issue. Screwed
parts, with the contact surfaces glued give good agreement with the experimental
results. On the other side, the bearings are properly modelled by springs adjusting
their stiffness according to the experimental results.
After the modes of the structural model have been validated, the main force
excitation frequency components are applied and the vibration response is obtained.
A satisfactory agreement between the calculated and real acoustic powers is
obtained, and it is expected that a better matching between them would be obtained
if the structural model were improved.
Acknowledgments The work presented in this paper has been carried out with the generous
support of the company Orona EIC and the Basque Government (SIRUMA, S-PE12MU010, and
HESIVAMO, UE2013-05).
References
1. Belmans RJM, Verdyck D, Geysen W, Findlay RD (1991) Electromechanical analysis of the
audible noise of an inverter-fed squirrel-cage induction motor. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 27
(3):539544
2. Gieras JF, Wang C, Lai JC (2005) Noise of polyphase electric motors. CRC press, New York
3. Kawasaki R, Hironaka Y, Nishimura M (2010) Noise and vibration analysis of elevator
traction machine. In: INTER-NOISE and NOISE-CON congress and conference proceedings.
Institute of Noise Control Engineering, pp 369377
4. Lakshmikanth S (2012) Noise and vibration reduction in permanent magnet synchronous
motorsa review. Int J Electr Comput Eng (IJECE) 2(3):405416
5. McCloskey A, Arrasate X, Almandoz G, Hernandez X (2014) Vibro-acoustic nite element
analysis of a permanent magnet synchronous machine. In: 9th international conference on
structural dynamics, Eurodyn 2014. To be held at Porto, Portugal from the 30th of June to 2nd
of July
6. Timar PL, Lai JCS (1994) Acoustic noise of electromagnetic origin in an ideal frequencyconverter-driven induction motor. IEE Proc Electr Power Appl 141(6):341346
7. Verdyck D, Belmans RJM (1994) An acoustic model for a permanent magnet machine: modal
shapes and magnetic forces. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 30(6):16251631
8. Wang C, Lai JCS (1999) Vibration analysis of an induction motor. J Sound Vib 224
(4):733756
9. Wang Huan, Williams Keith (1995) The vibrational analysis and experimental verication of a
plane electrical machine stator model. Mech Syst Sig Proc 9(4):429438
10. Watanabe S, Kenjo S, Ide K, Sato F, Yamamoto M (1983) Natural frequencies and vibration
behaviour of motor stators. IEEE Trans Power Appar Syst 4:949956