Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Founded in 1915
Copyright
ORIGINAL
ARTICLES
Dr. Burstone
China
Chinese NiTi wire was studied by means of a bending test to determine wire stiffness, springback, and maximum
bending moments. Chinese NiTi wire has an unusual deactivation curve (unlike steel and nitinol wires) in which
relatively constant forces are produced over a long range of action. The characteristic flexural stiffness of
NiTi wire is determined by the amount of activation. At large activations NiTi wires has a stiffness of only 7% that
of a comparable stainless steel wire, and at small activations 28% of steel wire. For the same activation at
large deflections, the forces produced are 38% that of a comparable nitinol wire. Chinese NiTi wire demonstrates
phenomenal springback. It can be deflected 1.8 times as far as nitinol wire or 4.4 times as far as stainless
steel wire without appreciable permanent deformation. NiTi wire is highly useful in clinical situations that require a
low-stiffness wire with an extremely large springback.
of Con-
has unique characteristics and offers significant potential in the design of orthodontic appliances. Its history
of little work hardening and a parent phase which is
austenite yield mechanical properties that differ significantly from nitinol wire. In addition, Chinese NiTi
wire has a much lower transition temperature than
nitinol wire.
It is the purpose of this article to describe the mechanical properties of Chinese NiTi wire with particular
reference to its orthodontic applications. Since stainless
steel is the most commonly used arch wire material,
NiTi wire will be compared to both stainless steel and
nitinol wires in contrasting their mechanical properties.
METHOD
Monrovia,
Calif.
445
446
Burstone,
The moment deflection characteristics of the stainless steel, nitinol, and Chinese NiTi wires are shown
in Fig. 2. The amount of springback is defined here as
the difference between the deflection (activation) of 80
and the residual deformation after unloading to 0 gmmm. Based on the 80 activation, the springbacks for
0.016 inch wires are 16 for steel, 52 for nitinol, and
73 for Chinese NiTi. Chinese NiTi wire has 1.4 times
the springback of nitinol wire and 4.6 times the springback of stainless steel wire for 80 of activation; at 40
of activation NiTi wire has 1.6 times the springback of
nitinol wire.
Stiffness
A bending test was used to evaluate the momentangular deflection characteristic of the wires. The stiffness was determined from the unloading curve, which
is analogous to clinical use.
The clinician is interested in the amount of force or
moment produced for any given deflection. This property of the material is its stiffness. In this study stiffness
is measured as induced bending moment per degree of
Volume 87
Number 6
----
447
Daactiallc.
mooL
E
E
ISOO-
d
E
E
I IOOO@
5
s
SW-
20
40
60
deflection. Stainless steel and beta-titanium exhibit approximately linear relations between moment and deflection during unloading; hence, a single constant can
describe the relationship.
The nickel-titanium alloys, particularly NiTi, exhibit nonlinear relationships between bending moment
and angular deflection. Therefore, a single constant
does not give an adequate measure of wire stiffness.
In Fig. 2 the loading (activation) curve is shown
for stainless steel wire, with an initial linear and a
nonlinear portion. As the wire returns to a passive position, the unloading relation is a curve. The curvature
is slight and, therefore, a straight line may be fit, to the
data. A straight line established by connecting the data
point at 80 with the unloaded point at 0 gm-mm or by
linear regression gives approximately the same stiffness
of 191 gm-mm per degree. As might be expected for
steel wire, the same deactivation stiffness is obtained
independent of the amount of activation produced.
Nitinol wire has a much lower deactivation stiffness
than stainless steel wire (Fig. 2). The average stiffness
from full load to the point of complete unloading is 39
gm-mm per degree. The average stiffness can be obtained by connecting the point of maximum loading
with the point of complete unloading or by carrying out
a linear regression of all points on the unloading curve.
As with steel either method gives approximately the
same result. It should be noticed that the unloading
curve for nitinol wire is less linear than that for steel
wire. The average stiffness may be somewhat misleading because the stiffness between the deflection at
80 to deactivation at 70 is 72 gm-mm per degree; the
stiffness from 40 to complete deactivation is 20 gmmm per degree; and the intermediate stiffness between
40 and 70 is 39 gm-mm per degree. It can also be
40
40
60
448
Am.
Onhod.
Junr 1985
.I.
deactivation, the stiffness increases as the moment values drop rapidly. For 80 of activation the average stiffness (based on a linear regression) is 14 gm-mm per
degree-only 36% that of nitinol wire. For the first 5
of unloading the stiffness is 61 gm-mm per degree, and
for the final 8 of unloading it is 27 gm-mm per degree.
The unloading stiffness in the middle range from 15
to 75 is 11 gm-mm per degree. Thus, through most of
the range of deactivation, the stiffness of the Chinese
Niti wire is about 11 gm-mm per degree. The loading
characteristic of a stainless steel braided wire (Respond,* 0.0155 inch) is also shown in Fig. 4. Although
the braided wire also has an average slope of 11 gmmm per degree, the clinical force system delivered
would be entirely different. During unloading the moments produced by the braided wire are much smaller.
*ORMCO,
Glendora,
Calif.
M)Cld
I
Degrees oj
activation
(gm-mm)
SD
1,400
27
97.5
69
25
805
24
40
Although the moments would decrease at a rate equivalent to that of NiTi wire, they would be delivered at
very low force levels. Note that the moment produced
at 80 of activation with the Respond wire is approximately one half that of the NiTi wire.
With the steel and nitinol wires, the average unloading stiffness is the same regardless of the amount
of activation. This is not true for Chinese NiTi wire.
Fig. 5 shows the loading and unloading curves for activations between 5 and 80. Fig. 6 plots the average
stiffness (using linear regression) for activations of 5
to 80. The average stiffness varies from 53 gm-mm
per degree at 5 to 14 gm-mm per degree at So. For
activations of 10 or less, the unloading curve and the
loading curve are identical. Because linear behavior is
occurring, use of a modulus of elasticity (E) in this
range is valid for predicting forces or moments.
The change in stiffness among different activations
is related to another clinically interesting finding;
namely, that the magnitude of force increases if a wire
is retied into a bracket. If one were to use a stainless
steel or nitinol wire, a certain amount of force would
be produced if one engaged an arch wire into a given
bracket. If the tooth moved toward the arch wire, and
the clinician then untied the wire and retied it, the force
would be the same after retying. This would not be true
with the Chinese NiTi wire. Following an 80 activation, if a tooth moved to the 40 position, 380 gm-mm
would remain (Fig. 7). If the wire is then untied and
retied, a higher moment (700 gm-mm) is producedalmost twice the moment as is produced when the wire
is left in place. As the wire continues to deactivate, the
moment produced by the twice-activated wire approaches the moment from a single activation.
Accurate prediction of orthodontic forces from NiTi
wire is difficult because considerable nonlinearity occurs during deactivation and stiffness depends on the
degree of activation. The average stiffness values for
the NiTi wire given in this article are based on the linear
regression method. A straight line connecting points
Volume 87
Number 6
449
3,067
29
64
16
20
2,112
38
28
52
65
1,233
29
13
91
Varying types of tooth movement require the delivery of different magnitudes of force. Unless an orthodontic wire is capable of delivering an adequate moment
before permanently deforming, it may not be satisfactory for a given application. It has been suggested previously that two maximum moments should be considered-the point of yield measured at 1 of permanent
deformation (M,) and the highest moment produced
after considerable yielding (M,,,).6 In this study the moment for stainless steel at 1 of permanent deformation
(M,) was found at 9 of activation and its magnitude
was 1,400 gm-mm (Table I). The nitinol wire exhibited
M, at 25 with a moment value of 975 gm-mm and the
Chinese NiTi wire. at 40 with 805 gm-mm. The ultimate moment (M,,J, which occurs after considerable
permanent deformation, is somewhat easier to establish
with stainless steel wires. M,it occurs where the change
of the slope of the loading curve becomes minimum or
when an increase in deflection produces little or no
increase in the measured moment. This ultimate moment is much more difficult to determine with nitinol
and NiTi wires because the geometry of loading
changes with the large deflections required. Therefore,
for convenience, we have used the moment produced
at 80 of activation instead of the maximum ultimate
moment that can be produced by the wire. At 80 the
ultimate moments produced were: 3,067 gm-mm for
stainless steel wire, 2112 gm-mm for Nitinol wire, and
1,233 gm-mm for Chinese NiTi wire. As shown in
Table II, these values should be taken in the context of
the amount of permanent deformation produced in the
wire. Although the stainless steel wire delivers 3,067
gm-mm, the percent of the recovery of the wire is only
20%.* The nitinol wire at 2,112 gm-mm has a 65%
Springback
= ~
Activation
Springback
(degrees)
SD
*Percent recovery
Permanent
deformation
(degrees)
Moment
(gm-mm)
x loo.
% Recovery
effects
effects
Stainless steel wires are resistant to additional permanent deformation that occurs with time. Some stress
relaxation may occur, but the effects are not significant.
The 0.016-inch stainless steel, nitinol, and Chinese
NiTi wires were engaged in brackets placed interproximally 3 mm apart with a 6.5 mm occlusogingival discrepancy between the center bracket and the adjacent
ones (Fig. 10). The wires remained tied in for periods
of 1 minute, 1 hour, and 72 hours. It should be noted
that, over 1 minute, the Chinese NiTi wire deformed
a limited amount, compared to the nitinol and stainless
steel wires which deformed considerably. Furthermore,
the nitinol wire continued to show a time-dependent
deformation past the initial 5 minutes. This has been
reported previously. Although NiTi wires show some
time-dependent effects, these are insignificant at room
temperature.
Am. J. Orthod.
June 1985
Clinical significance
and discussion
Glendora,
Calif.
NiTi wire. Very small reduction in springback at mouth temperature. Higher temperature (So0 C) reduces springback and increases stiffness. Higher temperatures are beyond usual clinical
range.
Volume 87
Number 6
c
Fig. 10. Time dependent effects. A, The 0.016~inch wires placed into three brackets. B, The shape of
the wires after removal. Top row-stainless
steel wire, middle row-nitinol
wire, bottom row-NiTi
wire:A, 1 minute. S, 1 hour. C, 3 days. Note small amount of permanent deformation of NiTi wire and
its increasing deformation over time with nitinol wire.
Wire Stiffness
for
Identical
Cross Sections
Reference Stiffness
(s.s.) = 1.0
1.0
0.8
0.6
a4
a2
~
S.S.
Nitinol
NiTi
(small
N iTi
A)
(large
Respond
A)
Fig. 11. Comparison of NiTi wire stiffness to that of wires composed of other materials. Stainless steel has a stiffness number
of 1 .O. At small deflections NiTi wire delivers 0.28 x the force
of steel. At large deflections only 0.07 x the force of steel is
delivered for the same activation.
452
Burstone,
activation. The load-deformation rate at small activations is considerably higher than that at large activations.
5. NiTi wire deformation is not particularly timedependent and, unlike nitinol wire, will not continue
to deform a significant amount in the mouth between
adjustments.
6. Chinese NiTi wire is highly suitable if low stiffness is required and large deflections are needed. Its
higher stiffness at small activations make it more effective than wires of traditional alloys whose force levels may be too low (as teeth approach the passive shape
of the wire).
REFERENCES
1. Andreasen
GF, Hilleman TB: An evaluation
of 5.5 cobalt substituted nitinol wire for use in orthodontics.
J Am Dent Assoc 82:
1373-1375,
1971.
2. Buehler WJ: Proceedings
of 7th Navy Science (ONR-16
Office
of Technical
Services,
US Department
of Commerce,
Washington, DC). Vol. 1, unclassified,
1963.
Reprint
requests
to:
Health
Center