Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Journal of Chromatography A
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/chroma
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 29 January 2010
Received in revised form 16 April 2010
Accepted 23 April 2010
Available online 29 April 2010
Keywords:
Fused-core columns
Supercially porous columns
Efciency
Dead volume
a b s t r a c t
Fused core or supercially porous columns offer the advantages of higher efciency compared with totally
porous columns of the same particle size, but similar operating pressures. However, their performance
may be adversely affected by extra-column effects that become more signicant as the column efciency
increases, and as the diameter of the column is reduced. In this study, we show that 10 cm 0.46 cm
fused-core columns can be used on modied conventional instruments (microbore systems) without
serious loss in performance, and this approach is at present likely to yield superior results compared with
use of 0.21 cm columns (of identical efciency) on current UHPLC instruments that have minimised extracolumn volume. Furthermore, the true efciency of commercial narrow-bore fused-core columns appears
to be reduced compared with those of conventional bore, which may be due to packing difculties for
the former type. The fused-core columns in general gave excellent performance, showing no evidence
of an upturn in the Knox plots at high ow velocities and elevated temperatures. Careful control of
experimental conditions is necessary to ensure accurate data for these plots.
2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Supercially porous or fused-core columns are a recent development of the original pellicular particles used in HPLC. In these
particles, a porous outer layer surrounds an impervious core.
The original pellicular particles typically consisted of porous layers of 12 m thickness, surrounding a solid non-porous core,
with overall particle diameter 30 m [1]. Such particles show
faster mass transfer, due to the smaller diffusion distance through
the porous layer, compared with (large) porous particles of the
same diameter, but suffered from rather poor sample capacity,
as less than 20% of the particle was porous. Later, particles of
much smaller overall diameter (5 m) with a 0.25 m thick porous
layer containing 30 nm pores were developed for the separation
of macromolecules, to take advantage of the smaller diffusion
distances for these low diffusivity solutes [2]. The efciency of
C18 columns for small molecules was reported as similar to that
of totally porous phases. Newer C18 particles of overall diameter 2.7 m, with porous layer 0.5 m thick, showed minimum
reduced plate heights (hmin ) as low as 1.5, a result replicated for
the equivalent bare silica hydrophilic interaction chromatography
(HILIC) phase [3,4]. In comparison, totally porous particles gener-
ally show 2.0 < hmin < 2.5. For the new particles, the porous layer
represents 75% of the volume of a totally porous particle, thus
the loading capacity is expected to be only slightly reduced. This
result was conrmed experimentally for the HILIC column [4]. It
was proposed that the high efciency of these particles might
be due to their lower internal porosity (smaller B term) in van
Deemter/Knox type equations and narrower particle size distribution and better packing (smaller eddy diffusion or A term), rather
than the smaller diffusion distance and improved mass transfer
(smaller C term) as originally suggested, at least for small molecules
[3,57].
An apparent disadvantage of these columns was the unusual
rate of increase of the plate height at high linear velocities, particularly at elevated temperature (up to 50 C) as demonstrated for the
test solute naphtho[2,3-a]pyrene [5]. Comparison of the results for
an excluded protein (bovine serum albumin) suggested that this
behaviour was not related to mass transfer kinetics in the stationary phase, but to some unexpected variation of the eddy dispersion
with the linear velocity at high temperatures, that might be connected with the roughness of the external surface of the fused-core
particles. The authors suggested therefore that if the separation
of low molecular weight compounds is performed at high velocities, the benet of using such columns might vanish. However, our
own study of similar bare silica fused-core HILIC columns did not
show any evidence of this effect at high ow rate, using similar
temperatures [4].
4562
4563
Fig. 1. System bandspreading measured for the two instruments using different probes/conditions. (a) Effect of different mobile phases and solutes for the UHPLC system.
(b) Effect of data gathering parameters on the bandspreading for naphthopyrene for the UHPLC system. (c) Comparison of bandspreading for naphthopyrene and uracil on
the microbore system.
the subsequent van Deemter/Knox plots (see below). The results are
comparable with those reported by Neue and co-workers, who have
given a detailed description of the complex factors that contribute
to bandspreading, concluding that the value of the individual contributions is difcult to predict [18]. These factors were reported
to include the dispersion in the injector and detector, the contribution of bandspreading in the tubing (which can be estimated using
the TaylorAris equation), and the time-based contribution to peak
broadening originating in the detector data collection rate and in
lters used. The tubing used between the injector and detector is
rather short in both HPLC and UHPLC applications. The TaylorAris
equation breaks down at low solute residence times. The authors
considered also an alternative treatment on the basis of work by
Golay, nally proposing a mathematical description of broadening
in the tubing using a random walk computer model. According to
Neue [18], the typical maximum as in Fig. 1(a) can be attributed
to the onset of secondary ow or turbulence, possibly caused by
the roughness of the internal surface of the tubing. Such an effect
4564
Fig. 2. Estimation of efciency loss due to extra-column bandspreading for fusedcore columns of different dimensions, on the two HPLC systems, as a function of
retention factor. AG = microbore system; AQ = UHPLC system. Calculations based on
bandspreading values determined for naphthopyrene in ACNwater (90:10, v/v)
at 37.5 C. Upper diagram 10 cm columns with 25000 plates. Lower diagram 5cm
columns with 12500 plates.
H
dp
(1)
Fdp
r 2 ext Dm
(2)
4565
with 25,000 plates is only around 2.5% at such high retention, a negligible gure. Fig. 3 shows also a partial Knox curve for the 0.46 cm
column on the UHPLC, corresponding to volumetric ow rates of
0.52.0 cm3 /min, the maximum ow rate that can be used with
our instrument. Surprisingly, the curve lies mostly slightly above
that for the same column on the microbore instrument, despite
the smaller bandspreading of the UHPLC, especially at the higher
ow rates. This result might be attributable to some small incompatibility in the temperature of the inuent to that of the column
temperature at high ows on this instrument, due to less effective
solvent pre-heating. In contrast to the UHPLC system, the microbore
system uses a serpentine capillary embedded in a massive heating block; this pre-heating system is reasonably effective, although
some cooling can take place at high set temperatures in the connecting capillary between the heating block and the column, due
to cold spots in the oven [13]. Apparently, the very small advantage
of the lower instrumental bandspreading of the UHPLC system has
no signicance at this high value of k (see Fig. 2). However, for
peaks of lower k, use of the 0.46 cm column on the UHPLC system is likely to generate the highest efciency, subject to the pump
being able to generate sufcient ow to achieve the minimum of
the Knox curve. The curve for the 0.21 cm fused-core column on the
UHPLC instrument lies clearly above that for the 0.46 cm column
on the microbore system. The predicted loss of efciency for such
a column with 25,000 plates on this instrument is still only around
6%, due to the high k of the solute. Correcting the reduced plate
height for the effects of the system bandspreading still shows less
favourable results for this 0.21 cm column (a maximum of around
20,900 plates for the true efciency) compared with the 0.46 cm
column. This result could be attributed to the greater difculties in
packing of the smaller diameter fused-core column [20]. A similar
reduction in efciency of narrower bore compared with 0.46 cm
fused-core columns (after correction for instrumental effects) was
also shown for those from a different manufacturer (Kinetex, Phenomenex, Torrance, USA, results not shown [21]). Table 2 shows
ts of these plots to the Knox equation:
h = A0.333 +
B
+ C
(3)
The tting coefcients reported for the 0.21 cm fused-core column were calculated from the data corrected for the extra-column
(instrumental) contribution to plate height, whereas for the 0.46 cm
columns, the data were uncorrected as the extra-column contributions are extremely small. The plot for the 0.21 cm column shows
A = 0.50, considerably higher than for the 0.46 cm column (A = 0.34),
indicating that differences in the packing could be responsible. Nevertheless, there is clearly some convergence of the curves for the
0.46 and 0.21 cm columns in the C term region of the plots at high
reduced velocity (see Fig. 3). Table 2 also indicates C = 0.034 for
the 0.21 cm column compared with 0.046 for the 0.46 cm fusedcore column. It is possible that this result could be explained
by greater frictional heating effects in the larger bore column,
as there is a greater difference in temperature between the core
and the walls in such columns, as heat is less easily conducted
away.
In conclusion, the combination of the 10 cm 0.46 cm column and the microbore system gave the optimum results.
In combination with the high k for naphthopyrene, this
combination also yields values of column efciency that do
not require correction for extra-column dispersion. Clearly
however, the contribution of extra-column effects needs
careful consideration for each individual experimental situation.
4566
Table 1
Backpressure measurements using different mobile phases at a ow of 1 cm3 /min for a 10 cm 0.46 cm fused core and 15 cm 0.46 cm totally porous columns, microbore
system.
Column
Mobile phase
10 cm 0.46 cm
fused
core
100% ACN, 25 C
90% ACN, 37.5 C
85% ACN, 50 C
78
82
81
19
22
23
59
60
58
40
22
18
Table 2
Fits of plots of reduced plate height for naphtho[2,3-a]pyrene against reduced interstitial velocity to the Knox equation.
Column/dimensions
Instrument
Mobile phase
10 cm 0.46 cm
fused
core
2.7 m
10 cm 0.21 cm fused core 2.7 m
15 cm 0.46 cm totally porous 5 m
Microbore
100% ACN, 25 C
90% ACN, 37.5 C
85% ACN, 50 C
3.2
5.4
5.7
0.33
0.34
0.38
2.9
3.8
3.7
0.067
0.046
0.041
UHPLC
Microbore
4.5
3.3
0.50
0.41
4.2
7.2
0.034
0.038
The data for the 0.21 cm I.D. column was corrected for extra-column effects, whereas the data for the 0.46 cm columns is uncorrected, due to the very small contribution of
extra-column effects under the experimental conditions.
neither was the upturn noted for a bare silica fused-core column in
HILIC [4]. A recent report of efciency measurements with fusedcore columns in which the instrumental variance was subtracted
from the observed peak variance also showed quite at plots of H vs
ow [23]. Nevertheless, we did not study higher molecular weight
solutes, whose performance might be affected by partial exclusion
from the relatively small pores of the fused-core column used.
3.5. Comparison of Knox plots for a totally porous particle column
Fig. 5 shows a similar Knox plot for a totally porous 5 m packing column run on the microbore instrument. The column shows
excellent efciency at the optimum ow velocity for a packing
of this type, yielding a minimum value of h = 1.95, corresponding to >100,000 plates/m. Table 2 indicates a slightly higher value
of the C coefcient on the 0.46 cm fused-core column run under
the same conditions (37.5 C, 90% ACN) compared with the porous
5 m phase (C = 0.046 and 0.038, respectively). Nevertheless, this
result could be attributed entirely to frictional heating effects in the
0.46 cm fused-core phase, as the value of C for the 0.21 mm fusedcore column is only 0.034. Clearly the backpressure on the 5 m
column was much lower (see Table 1) despite its longer length,
1000FL
r 2 dp2
(4)
where F is the volumetric ow rate, is the viscosity, L the column length, r the internal radius and dp the particle size of the
packing [19]. However, this expression is only approximate, and
could lead to errors in the estimated particle size. More importantly, the equations used to describe the dependence of h on ow
(the Knox treatment) may be too simplistic; for example, there are
better ways to calculate the B contribution [5,24].
4. Conclusions
A microbore LC and a UHPLC system were carefully characterised as to their effect on the determination of van Deemter/Knox
curves for highly efcient fused-core columns. Instrumental bandspreading effects can have serious effects on the measurement of
HETP. However, for the high k solute used in these studies, the
effects were minimised and negligible when using a large diameter 0.46 cm column together with a microbore LC and smaller
than for a 0.21 cm column used with a UHPLC system. Furthermore, it appears that at present it may not be possible to pack
narrower bore fused-core columns of as high (true) efciency as
4567