You are on page 1of 20

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) FOR T

Name of Employee
Position
Review Period
Bureau/Center/Service/Division

MFO
KRA 1

KRA

OBJECTIVES

I. Teaching-Learning Process

TIMELINE

WEIGHT
PER KRA

June - March

35%
5%

June - March

12%

1. Prepared at least 135 complete lesson plans


throughout the rating period.

2. Utilized Visuals/Printed Ims and other


Manipulative instructional materials that are
appropriate to the lesson's objective.

Page 1

June - March

5%

June- March

7%

3. Established and maintained a classhome that is


conducive for learning throughout the year with at
least 75% of the Division Standard Classhome
Evaluation Checklist. (Refer to the Division
Standard classhome evaluation checklist for Elem.
And Sec.)

4. Taught all competencies in the Budget of


Lesson in all subject areas with 75% mastery.

Page 2

5. Constructed 80 complete indexed IMs/eIMs (10


per subject area)

June-March

3%

6. Conducted weekly RRE episodes with at least


75% Performance Level in the Quarterly
Summative Test

June-March

3%

Page 3

II. Pupils/Students Outcomes


1. Attained an average MPS of 75% in the
following:

June-March

30%
5%

June-March

4%

June-March

4%

School-based Achievement Test (0.5%)


Division Achievement Test (1%)
NAT (0.5%)
2. Attained 0 drop-out rate in all classes handled

3. Zero-out non-readers & non-numerates

Page 4

June-March

7%

5. Zero out failure rate

June-March

4%

6. Updated school records


SF 1

June-March

2%

4. Increased the number of readers from


frustration level to instructional/independent level
in all classes handled

Page 5

SF 2
SF 3
SF 5
LIS Portal
Class Records
Form 138
Form 137
Form 9 (for HS)
Grade Sheets
Summative Test Questions with
TOS

7. Prepared and submitted any of the following


reports as required
Quarterly Periodic Exam Results (MPS)
Oral Reading Test Results (PHIL IRI Oral &
Silent, EGRA, MTB-MLE)
Form 48
Monthly Accomplishment Report
Pre-test/Post test
Nutritional Status Report
PPFT
Page 6

June-March

2%

GAD Report
Others (Please specify)
Guidance Forms
Students Ranklist
3%

8. Participated in academic and non-academic


competitions like
MTAP
Scouting
DAMATH
District
Journalism, Congressional &
Provincial Meets
Others (pls. specify)
Culture & Arts, YES-O, Leadership,
Public Speaking, Technolympics)

2%

9. Conducted counselling sessions to at least 3


pupils with supporting evidences.

KRA 3

III. Community Involvement

1. Conducted at least 3 PTA meetings with the


following MVs:
Attendance Sheets
Minutes of the Meetings
Others (pls. specify)

Page 7

June-March

4%

3. Participated in at least three civic-oriented


activities

KRA 4

IV. Professional Growth &


Development

Year-round

2%

1. Attended in-service trainings of at least 3 days


conducted by DepEd

20%
10%

2. Earned a Master's Degree

5%

Page 8

3. Earned NC II/TM Certificate

5. Plus Factor
Winning Coach Awardee

5%

5%
2%

Resource Speaker/ Trainer


Facilitator
Chairmanship
Curriculum writer
1%

100% Daily Attendance and


other school related activities

Action Research

2%

Page 9

Page 10

M (IPCRF) FOR TEACHERS


Name of Rater
Position
Date of Review

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR

ACTUAL RESULT

RATING

5 - Prepared 180 and above complete


daily lesson plans
4 - Prepared 158-179 daily complete
teaching plans
3 - Prepared 135-157 daily complete
teaching plans
2 - Prepared 114-134 daily complete
teaching plans
1 - Prepared 113 and below complete
daily teaching plans

5 - ICT/Multimedia, Audio, Visual and


Printed and Manipulative instructional
materials were utilized throughout the
lessons.
4 - Audio, Visual and Printed and
Manipulative instructional materials were
utilized throughout the lessons.
3 - Visual, Printed and other
Manipulative instructional materials were
utilized

Page 11

3 - Visual, Printed and other


Manipulative instructional materials were
utilized
throughout the lessons.
2 - Printed materials were utilized
throughout the lessons.
1 - innovative instructional materials
were not utilized throughout the lessons.

5 - Met 96-100% of the items on the


Division Standard Classhome evaluation
checklist
4 - Met 86-95% of the items on the
Division Standard Classhome evaluation
checklist
3 - Met 75-85% of the items on the
Division Standard Classhome evaluation
checklist
2 - Met 50-74% of the items on the
Division Standard Classhome evaluation
checklist
1 - Met only 49% and below of the items
on the Division Standard Classhome
evaluation checklist

5 - 95% and above competencies were


taught with at least 75% mastery
4 - 85-94% of the competencies were
taught with at least 75% mastery level
Page 12

3 - 75-84% of the competencies were


taught with 75% mastery level
with at least 75% mastery level
2 - 65-74% of the competencies were
taught with 75% mastery level
1 - 64% and below of the competencies
were taught with 75% mastery level

5 - 101 or more complete indexed


IMs/eIMs were prepared
4 - 90-100 complete indexed IMs/eIMs
were prepared
3 - 80-89 complete indexed IMs/eIMs
were prepared
2 - 70-79 complete indexed IMs/eIMs
were prepared
1 - 69 and below complete indexed
IMs/eIMs were prepared

5 - conducted weekly RRE episodes and


attained at least 96-100% proficiency
level in the Quarterly Summative Test

4 - conducted weekly RRE episodes and


attained at least 86-95% proficiency
level in the Quarterly Summative Test
Page 13

4 - conducted weekly RRE episodes and


attained at least 86-95% proficiency
level in the Quarterly Summative Test

3 - conducted weekly RRE


episodes and attained at least 75-85%
proficiency level in the
Quarterly Summative Test

2 - conducted weekly RRE episodes and


attained at least 50-74% proficiency
level in the Quarterly Summative Test

1 - conducted weekly RRE episodes and


attained at least 49% and below
proficiency level in the Quarterly
Summative Test

5 - attained 75% MPS and above


4 - attained 66-74% MPS
3 - attained 57-65% PMS
2 - attained 29-56% MPS
1 - attained 0-28% MPS

5 - 0 drop-out rate
4 - 0.1-1.0% drop-out rate
3 - 1.1-2.0% drop-out rate
2 - 2.1-3.0% drop-out rate
1 - above 3.0% drop-out rate
5 -0 non-reader
4 -non-reader is only 0.1-1.0%
of the class
Page 14

3 -non-reader is only 1.1-2.0%


of the class
2 -non-reader is only 2.1-3.0%
of the class
1 - non-reader is above 3.0%
of the class
5 - increased 5 readers from current
reading level to the next higher reading
level
4 - increased 4 readers from current
reading level to the next higher reading
level
3 - increased 3 readers from current
reading level to the next higher reading
level
2 - increased 2 readers from current
reading level to the next higher reading
level
1 - increased 1 readers from current
reading level to the next higher reading
level
5 - 0% failure rate
4 - failure is only 1.0% of the class
3 - failure is only 2.0% of the class
2 - failure is only 3.0% of the class
1 - failure is 4.0% and above of the class
5 - all School Records listed below are
updated:
Page 15

Class Records/Grade Sheets


reflected the bases of students' ratings
in all classes/subject areas handled
LIS was updated on or before the
deadline
Updated SF2 every month
Updated SF1 and SF3 three
weeks after the opening of classes
Updated Form 138 and 137 every
quarter
Updated Form 138, 137, 9 and SF5
at the end of the school year
Four Quarterly tests with complete
Table of Specifications
4 - lacks 1 school record
3 - lacks 2 school records
2 - lacks 3 school records
1 - lacks 4 school records
5 - Prepared and submitted all reports 2
days earlier than the deadline
4 - Prepared and submitted all reports 1
day earlier than the deadline
3 - Prepared and submitted all reports
on the deadline
2 - Prepared and submitted all reports 1
day after the deadline
1 - Prepared and submitted all reports 2
days and more after the deadline

Page 16

1 - Prepared and submitted all reports 2


days and more after the deadline

5 - International/National participation
4 - Regional participation
3 - Division participation
2 - Area/District participation
1 - School participation

5 - Conducted counselling sessions to 5


or more pupils
4 - Conducted counselling sessions to 4
pupils
3 - Conducted counselling sessions to 3
pupils
2 - Conducted counselling sessions to 2
pupils
1 - Conducted counselling sessions to 1
pupil

5 - Conducted four (4) Brigada Eskwela


activities with complete documentation
4 - Conducted three (3) Brigada Eskwela
activities with complete documentation
Page 17

3 - Conducted two (2) Brigada Eskwela


activities with complete documentation
2 - Conducted one (1) Brigada Eskwela
activity with complete documentation
1 - Conducted Brigada Eskwela activity
with no documentation

5 - Participated 5 or more civic-oriented


activities with MOVs (pictures,
certificate)
4 - Participated 4 civic-oriented activities
with MOVs (pictures, certificate)
3 - Participated 3 civic-oriented activities
with MOVs (pictures, certificate)
2 - Participated 2 civic-oriented activities
with MOVs (pictures, certificate)
1 - Participated only 1 civic-oriented
activities with MOVs (pictures,
certificate)
5 - International/National Level
4 - Regional Level
3 - Division Level
2 - District Level
1 - attended w/out permit
5 - Masters/Doctoral Degree
4 - Complete Academic Requirements
(CAR)
Page 18

3 - Earned at least 21-27 units in


Graduate Study
2 - Earned at least 12-18 units in
Graduate Study
1 - Earned 9 units in Graduate Study
5 - TM Holder
4 - NC II Holder
3 - NC I Holder
2 - Attended NC Training
1 - Currently enrolled for NC training

5 - International Level
4 - National Level
3 - Regional Level
2 - Division Level
1 - Area Level
0.5 - School Level

5 - perfect attendance
4 - 1 to 2 absences
3 - 3 to 5 absences
2 - 6 to 8 absences
1 - 9 or more absences
5 - Accomplished the Action Research
with MOVs
4 - Implemented the Action Research
with MOVs
3 - Approved Action Research by the
SDS/ASDS
Page 19

2 - Submitted Action Research Proposal


to the SDS/ASDS
1 - Proposed Action Research to the
immediate supervisor

Page 20

You might also like