Professional Documents
Culture Documents
METHODOLOGY:
This project is an analytical research where in the researcher has to use the available facts as
information and analyze these to make a critical evaluation of materials. This is also an applied
research with an aim to find a solution for immediate problems facing industry or the firm. The
methodologies followed in the analysis of the financial statement are comparative statement,
Common size statement, Trend analysis, ratio analysis, fund flow analysis and cash flow analysis.
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY
The purpose of study includes assessing the net present value and liquidity strength of the company
Sources of data collection
1. Primary data: the data required for the project was collected minor through primary data. That is
through interviewing to access the companys trends for the last four years with regard to liquidity
performance. The purpose of doing this project mainly to make a thorough study of the financial
analysis of the company. Purpose of the study and discussion with concerned authorities in the
company.
2. Secondary data: the major source of data for this project was collected from annual reports, profit
and loss account, manuals and some more information collected through the internet.
Plan of analysis
This study is conducted with the help of statistics figures & techniques like Graphs & charts for
better comparison and interpretation.
Capital budgeting
Capital budgeting (or investment appraisal) is the planning process used to determine whether an
organization's long term investments such as new machinery, replacement machinery, new plants,
new products, and research development projects are worth pursuing. It is budget for major capital, or
investment, expenditure.
DEFINITION
According to two Economist Keizer Hayed and Saladin Shah:
capital budgeting is a long term economics decision making it is called capital budgeting Each
potential project's value should be estimated using a discounted cash flow (DCF) valuation, to find
its net present value (NPV). (First applied to Corporate Finance by Joel Dean in 1951; see also Fisher
separation theorem, John Burr Williams: Theory.) This valuation requires estimating the size and
timing of all the incremental cash flows from the project. (These future cash highest NPV (GE).) The
NPV is greatly affected by the discount rate, so selecting the proper rate - sometimes called the hurdle
rate - is critical to making the right decision. The hurdle rate is the Minimum on an investment. This
should reflect the riskiness of the investment, typically measured by the volatility of cash flows, and
must take into account the financing mix. Managers may use models such as the CAPM or
the APT to estimate a discount rate appropriate for each particular project, and use the weighted
average cost of capital (WACC) to reflect the financing mix selected. A common practice in choosing
a discount rate for a project is to apply a WACC that applies to the entire firm, but a higher discount
rate may be more appropriate when a project's risk is higher than the risk of the firm as a whole.
INVESTME
NT
DECISION
CAPITAL
BUDGETI
NG AND
FINANCIN
G
FINANCING
DECISION
Identification of Potential Investment Opportunities: The capital budgeting process begins with
the identification of potential investment opportunities. Typically, the planning body (it may be an
individual or a committee organized formally or informally) develops estimates of future sales which
serve as the basis for setting production targets. This information, in turn, is helpful in identifying
required investments in plant and equipment. For imaginative identification of investment ideas it is
helpful to (i) monitor external environment regularly to scout investment opportunities, (ii) formulate
a well defined corporate strategy based on a thorough analysis of strengths, weakness, opportunities,
and threats, (iii) share corporate strategy and perspectives with persons who are involved in the
process of capital budgeting, and (iv) motivate employees to make suggestions.
Assembling of Investment Proposals: Investment proposals identified by the production department
and the other departments are usually submitted in a standardized capital investment proposal firm.
Generally, most of the proposals, before they reach the capital budgeting committee or somebody
which assembles them, are routed through several persons. The purpose of routing a proposal through
several persons is primarily to ensure that the proposal is viewed from different angles. It also helps
in creating a climate for bringing about coordination of interrelated activities. Investment proposals
are usually classified into various categories for facilitating decision-making, budgeting and control.
An illustrative classification is given below:
Replacement investments
Expansion investments
New product investments
Obligatory and welfare investments
Decision Making: A system of rupee gateways usually characterizes capital investment decision
making. Under this system, executives are vested with the power to okay investment proposals up to
certain limits. For example, in one company the plant superintendent can okay investment outlays up
to Rs.2,000,000, the works manager up to Rs.500,000, and the managing director up to
Rs.2,000,000.Investments requiring higher outlays need the approval of the board of directors.
Preparation of Capital Budget and Appropriations: Projects involving smaller outlays and which
can be decided by executives at lower levels are often covered by a blanket appropriation for
expeditious action. Projects involving larger outlays are included in the capital budget after necessary
approvals. Before undertaking such projects an appropriation order is usually required. The purpose
of this check is mainly to ensure that the funds position of the firm is satisfactory at the time of
implementation. Further, it provides an opportunity to review the project at the time of
implementation.
Implementation: Translating an investment proposal into a concrete project is a complex, timeconsuming, and risk-fraught task. Delays in implementation, which are common, can lead to
substantial cost-overruns. For expeditious implementation at a reasonable cost, the following are
helpful:
Adequate formulation of projects: The major reason for delay is inadequate formulation of projects.
Put differently, if necessary homework in terms of preliminary studies and comprehensive and
detailed formulation of the project is not done, many surprises and shocks are likely to spring on the
way. Hence, the need for adequate formulation of the project cannot be over emphasized.
Use of the principle of responsibility accounting: Assigning specific responsibilities to project
managers for completing the project within the defined time-frame and cost limits is helpful for
It throws light on how realistic were the assumptions underlying the project,
It provides a documented log of experience that is highly valuable for decision making,
It helps in uncovering judgmental biases;
It includes a desired caution among project sponsors.
payback period.
Arrange these selected projects in increasing order of their respective payback periods.
Select those projects from the top of the list till the capital Budget is exhausted.
C. Mutually Exclusive Projects
In the case of two mutually exclusive projects, the one with a lower payback period is accepted,
when the respective payback periods are less than or equivalent to the stipulated payback period.
net
month
inflow
outflow
CUMULATIVE
cash
CASH FLOWS
flow
1247539
3380082
-
-3380082
1087445
-
-4467527
2
1395002
1621066
-
-6088593
8
1395204 1443331
8611364
-14699957
april
9095308
may
6839212 7926657
june
july
august
septemb
1477189 1639296
6
5338664
-481273
8770677 8092428
678249
9080367 9282185
1569070 1704827
-201818
-
r
decembe
3
7
1080982 1130228
1357574
r
january
february
1
4
8194121 8690648
5898924 6602643
2598490 2209975
er
october
novembe
march
total
1344266 1482965
35
69
-492463
-496527
-703719
3885148
1386993
4
-15181230
-14502981
-14704799
-16062373
-16554836
-17051363
-17755082
-13869934
revenues. But if the signs of the cash flows change more than once, there may be several IRRs. The
IRR equation generally cannot be solved analytically but only via iterations.
One shortcoming of the IRR method is that it is commonly misunderstood to convey the actual
annual profitability of an investment. However, this is not the case because intermediate cash flows
are almost never reinvested at the project's IRR; and, therefore, the actual rate of return is almost
certainly going to be lower. Accordingly, a measure called Modified Internal Rate of Return (MIRR)
is often used.
Despite a strong academic preference for NPV, surveys indicate that executives prefer IRR over NPV
[citation needed]
measures should be used to maximize the overall NPV of the firm. Some managers find it intuitively
more appealing to evaluate investments in terms of percentage rates of return than dollars of NPV.
The IRR is the discount rate at which the NPV for a project equals zero. This rate means that the
present value of the cash inflows for the project would equal the present value of its outflows.
The IRR is the break-even discount rate.
The IRR is found by trial and error.
where r = IRR
IRR of an annuity:
where:
Q (n,r) is the discount factor
Io is the initial outlay
C is the uniform annual receipt (C1 = C2 =....= Cn).
Where:
A. "Capital Rationing" situation Select projects whose NPV is positive or equivalent to zero.
Arrange in the descending order of NPVs. Select Projects starting from the list till the capital budget
allows.
B. "No capital Rationing" Situation
Select every project whose NPV >= 0
C. Mutually Exclusive Projects
Select the one with a higher NPV.
If cash flows are discounted at k1, NPV is positive and IRR > k1: accept project.
If cash flows are discounted at k2, NPV is negative and IRR < k2: reject the project.
Mathematical proof: for a project to be acceptable, the NPV must be positive, i.e.
Assuming that the cash flow calculated does not include the investment made in the project, a
profitability index of 1 indicates breakeven. Any value lower than one would indicate that the
project's PV is less than the initial investment. As the value of the profitability index increases, so
does the financial attractiveness of the proposed project.
,
Where n is the number of equal periods at the end of which the cash flows occur (not the number of
cash flows), PV is present value (at the beginning of the first period), FV is future value (at the end of
the last period).
The formula adds up the negative cash flows after discounting them to time zero using the external
cost of capital, adds up the positive cash flows including the proceeds of reinvestment at the external
reinvestment rate to the final period, and then works out what rate of return would cause the
magnitude of the discounted negative cash flows at time zero to be equivalent to the future value of
the positive cash flows at the final time period.
ADVANTAGES
Considers the risk of cash flows( through of cost of capital decision rules)
DISADVANTAGES
projects
May not give value maximizing decision when used to choose projects when there is capital
rationing
RANKED PROJECTS
The real value of capital budgeting is to rank projects. Most organizations have many projects that
could potentially be financially rewarding. Once it has been determined that a particular project has
exceeded its hurdle, then it should be ranked against peer projects (e.g. - highest Profitability index to
lowest Profitability index). The highest ranking projects should be implemented until the budgeted
capital has been expended.
FUNDING SOURCES
When a corporation determines its capital budget, it must acquire said funds. Three methods are gee
stock have no financial risk but dividends, including all in arrears, must be paid to the preferred
stockholders before any cash disbursements can be made to common stockholders; they generally
have interest rates higher than those of corporate bonds. Finally, common stocks entail no financial
risk but are the most expensive way to finance capital projects. The Internal Rate of Return is very
important.
NEED FOR CAPITAL BUDGETING
1. As large sum of money is involved, which influences the profitability of the firm, makes
capital budgeting an important task.
2. Long term investment once made cannot be reversed without significance loss of invested
capital. The investment becomes sunk and mistakes, rather than being readily rectified, must
often be born until the firm can be withdrawn through depreciation charges or liquidation. It
influences the whole conduct of the business for the years to come.
3. Investment decision are the base on which the profit will be earned and probably measured
through the return on the capital. A proper mix of capital investment is quite important to
ensure adequate rate of return on investment, calling for the need of capital budgeting.
4. The implication of long term investment decisions are more extensive than those of short run
decisions because of time factor involved, capital budgeting decisions are subject to the
higher degree of risk and uncertainty than short run decision
RATIO ANALYSIS
Financial management is the specific area of finance dealing with the financial corporations make
and the tools and analysis used to make decisions. The decisions as a whole may be divided between
long term and short term decisions and techniques . Both share the same goal of enhancing firm value
by ensuring that return on capital exceeds cost of capital ,without taking excessive financial risks.
Capital investment decision comprises the long term choice about which projects receive investment,
whether to finance that investment with equity or debt. Short term financing requirements are called
working capital management and deal with balance of current assets and current liabilities by
managing cash inventories and short term borrowings.
Corporate finance is closely related to managerial finance which is slightly broader in scope,
describing the financial techniques available to all forms of business enterprise.
The level and historical trends of these ratios can be used to make inferences about a
companys financial condition, its operations and attractiveness as an investment. The information in the
statements is used by
Trade creditors to identify the firms ability to meet their claims i.e liquidity position of the
company
Investors to know about the present and future profitability of the company nad its financial
structure
Management, in every aspect of the financial analysis. It is the responsibility of the
management to maintain sound financial condition in the company.
Nature of work
Working conditions
Employment
Training, other qualifications and advancements
Job outlook
Earnings
Related occupations
The study has great significance and provides benefits to various parties whom directly
Select information related to decision under consideration from the statements and calculate
appropriate ratios.
To compare the ratios with the ratios of the same firm in past years with the industry ratios. It
Ratios are relative figures reflecting the relation between the variables.they enable analyst to
draw conclusions regarding functional operations. They use ratios as atool of financial
analysis involves the comparison with related facts. This is the basis of ratio analysis. The
basis is of four types Past ratios- calculated from past financial statements of the firm
Competitors ratio-progressive and successful competitors at the same point of time.
Industry ratio- the industry to which the firm belongs
Projected ratios-ratios of future developed with the help of future developed financial
statements.
INTERPRETATION OF THE RATIOS
The interpretation of ratios is an important factor. The inherent limitations of ratio
analysis should be kept in mind while interpreting them. The impact of factors
such as price level changes, change in accounting policies, window dressing
etc., should also be kept in mind when attempting to interpret ratios. The interpretation
of ratios can be made in the following ways.
IMPORTANCE OF RATIO ANALYSIS
Aid to measure general efficiency
Aid to measure financial solvency
Aid in forecasting and planning
Facilitate decision making
Aid in corrective action
Aid in intra-firm comparison
Act as a good communication
Evaluation of efficiency
Effective tool
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash in hand
Cash at bank
Bills receivables
Inventories
Work in progress
Marketable securities
Short term investments
Sundry debtors
Pre paid expenses
CURRENT LIABILTIES
Outstanding expenses
Bank overdraft
Bills payable
Short term advances
Sundry creditors
Dividends payable
IT payable
Quick ratio- It is defined as the relationship between quick or liquid assets and current
liabilities. An asset is said to be liquid when it can be converted to cash in short term and
without much loss of value.
Absolute liquid ratio: Although receivable, debtors and bills receivable are more liquid than
inventories yet there is a doubt about their realization
Particulars
(From 1-Apr-2011)
1-Apr-2011 to 31-Mar-2012
Opening Stock
10096980.00
Stock-Raw Materials
Stock - WIP
10096980.00
80201327.37
73614546.29
Site Expense
Particulars
111174494.55
SALES @14%
71968973.38
36751337.97
2454183.20
A/c.
Closing Stock
Stock - WIP
5874827.08
(From 1-Apr-2011)
1-Apr-2011 to 31-Mar-2012
Sales Accounts
Stock-Raw Materials
62864.00
649090.00
Direct Expenses
Direct Expenses -Interior Works
25878206.00
2164589.00
20952000.00
2761617.00
137052700.55
29655212.50
23948148.00
Indirect Incomes
1800810.00
DISCOUNT
17099180.68
93217.01
9868.00
Commissioning
5400.00
Interest on IT Refund
54260.00
1650.00
Interest Recd FD
29089.01
Gautham
Genset Charges
119000.00
Installation Charges
296866.00
Insurance Charges
97644.00
Labour Charges
Lab Testing Charges
Loading & Unloading Charges
SECURITY CHARGES
1899622.50
1200.00
38446.00
562482.00
Service Charges
31314.00
20583.00
Site Rent
55100.00
Transportation Charges
776947.00
17099180.68
137052700.5
5
Indirect Expenses
Electricity Charges
12078121.81
188137.00
EPF A/c
50443.00
ESI A/c
4742.00
Financial Expenses
2234073.70
Rent Expenses
1036000.00
2304002.00
Telephone Charges
272735.94
Audit Fees
55150.00
22500.00
211536.00
50060.00
1416732.00
2000.00
Fuel Expenses
328728.00
353224.00
Legal Charges
30000.00
26562.00
Misc. Expenditure
54411.00
Office Maintenance
82715.00
Penalty (GOVT.)
4000.00
5161.00
141138.68
Professional Fees
182775.00
2500.00
57116.00
227392.00
582.59
1938832.90
52187.00
Stock Insurance
25995.00
131401.00
VAT Paid
162498.00
Vehicle Maintenance
27375.00
Water Charges
167215.00
Written Off
228201.00
Nett Profit
Total
attendance
bank
payment
cash
payment
bank receipt
cash receipt
contra
credit note
debit note
delivery note
job work in
order
job work out
order
journal
material in
material out
memorandu
m
payment
payroll
physical
stock
purchase
purchase
order
receipt
receipt note
rejections in
rejections
out
5114275.88
17192397.69
Total
17192397.69
reversing
journal
sales
sales order
stock journal
LIST OF LEDGERS
Operations
--- - -
OPERATIONS
BUSINESS
TEAM
DEVELOPMENT
PURCHASE
ACCOUNTS
HR
Head Purchase
Senior Accountant
HR Manager
Purchase Managers
Accountants
HR Executives
Head Business
Head Projects
Development
Business Development
Project Coordinators
Managers
Business Development
Project Managers
Executives
Accounts
Purchase Executives
Assistants
Admin
Business Relationship
Site Engineers
Site Supervisors
Quantity Surveyors
Safety Supervisors
Store Keepers
Executive