Professional Documents
Culture Documents
School of Textile and Material Engineering, Dalian Polytechnic University, Dalian 116034, China
Department of Electronic Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
a r t i c l e i n f o
abstract
Article history:
Received 23 October 2013
Received in revised form
9 May 2014
Accepted 15 May 2014
Available online 27 May 2014
Keywords:
Sm3
Germanotellurite glasses
JO intensity parameters
External quantum yield
1. Introduction
Over the past decades, rare earth (RE) ions have been
extensively investigated in various host matrices due to
their important roles in developing various optoelectronic
devices such as optical sensors, phosphors, lasers, solar
cells, and optical amplifiers [17]. Among the trivalent RE
ions with 4f n electronic configuration, Sm3 emits strong
orangish-red luminescence in the visible region which are
attractive in color displays, visible solid-state lasers and
photodynamic therapy (PDT) light sources owing to its
emitting 4G5/2 level exhibiting relative high internal quantum efficiency and multi-fluorescence channels [811].
Among oxide glasses, tellurite glasses, especially containing heavy metal oxides (HMO) such as Ga2O3, Nb2O5,
WO3, Ta2O5, PbO, La2O3, and Bi2O3 [1220], have arisen
great interest because of their higher refractive indices and
n
Corresponding author at: School of Textile and Material Engineering,
Dalian Polytechnic University, Dalian 116034, China. Tel.: 86 41186323097.
E-mail address: lhai8686@yahoo.com (H. Lin).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2014.05.014
0022-4073/& 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
64
F. Wang et al. / Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy & Radiative Transfer 147 (2014) 6370
Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of the experimental setup for external quantum yield measurement.
F. Wang et al. / Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy & Radiative Transfer 147 (2014) 6370
65
Fig. 2. (a) Transparency spectrum of 0.4 wt% Sm2O3 doped NZPGT glasses with a thickness of 2.63 mm. (b) Raman spectrum of NZPGT host glasses. (c) DTA
curve of 0.2 wt% Sm2O3 doped NZPGT glasses.
66
F. Wang et al. / Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy & Radiative Transfer 147 (2014) 6370
Table 1
Experimental and calculated oscillator strengths of Sm3 in NZPGT glasses.
Transition from 6H5/2 to
Energy (cm 1)
Pexp (10 6)
Ped-cal (10 6)
10,565
9234
8094
7236
6693
5097
0.331
2.398
3.908
3.497
4.049
0.287
0.355
2.284
4.002
3.460
4.052
0.215
F11/2
F9/2
F7/2
6
F5/2
6
F3/2, 6H15/2, 6F1/2
6
H13/2
6
6
Pmd-cal (10 6)
0.0015
0.0004
Table 2
JO intensity parameters t (10 20 cm2) and the ratio 4/6 of Sm3 in various glass systems.
Glass system
4/6
Ref.
0.73
1.30
1.37
1.50
1.61
1.92
2.48
3.29
3.42
4.97
3.52
4.56
3.08
2.77
3.75
3.53
6.35
2.99
9.16
2.80
4.16
4.70
2.05
1.54
1.58
1.89
1.79
3.44
1.82
5.28
1.85
3.14
1.90
2.22
2.00
1.75
1.98
1.97
1.84
1.64
1.73
1.51
1.32
2.47
[35]
[36]
[37]
[38]
[39]
[40]
[41]
[42]
[43]
[44]
This work
Table 3
Spontaneous transition probabilities Arad, fluorescence branching ratios ij, and calculated radiative lifetime rad of Sm3 in NZPGT glasses.
Transition from 4G5/2 to
Energy (cm 1)
Aed (s 1)
Amd (s 1)
Arad (s 1)
ij (%)
rad (ms)
7313
8644
9784
10,660
11,167
11,435
11,606
12,781
14,300
15,634
16,844
17,878
0.44
4.14
6.24
32.38
4.87
0.46
4.45
7.46
70.30
241.30
236.77
19.29
0
0
2.06
6.63
9.78
0
0
0
0
0
24.31
29.01
0.44
4.14
8.30
39.01
14.65
0.46
4.45
7.46
70.30
241.30
261.08
48.30
0.06
0.59
1.19
5.57
2.09
0.07
0.64
1.07
10.04
34.48
37.30
6.90
1.43
F11/2
F9/2
F7/2
6
F5/2
6
F3/2
6
H15/2
6
F1/2
6
H13/2
6
H11/2
6
H9/2
6
H7/2
6
H5/2
6
6
Fig. 4. Emission spectrum of 0.2 wt% Sm2O3 doped NZPGT glasses under
405.0 nm excitation. Inset: emission cross-section profiles.
F. Wang et al. / Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy & Radiative Transfer 147 (2014) 6370
formula:
sem
Aij 5 ij Iij
R
;
8cn2 ij Iij d
where Aij, ij and I(ij) are the radiation transition probability, the wavelength and the emission intensity from i to
j state, respectively. c is the light speed in vacuum and n is
the refractive index. Large stimulated emission crosssections are attractive features for low-threshold and
high-gain laser applications [45].
Here, the derived stimulated emission cross-section
profiles are shown in the inset of Fig. 4, and the maximum
stimulated emission cross-sections sem-max originating
from the transitions 4G5/2-6H5/2, 4G5/2-6H7/2, 4G5/26
H9/2 and 4G5/2-6H11/2 were deduced to be 1.54
10 22, 8.59 10 22, 10.00 10 22 and 2.98 10 22 cm2,
respectively. For comparison, the sem-max values of Sm3
in various glasses [9,35,38,42,4649] are listed in Table 4.
The sem-max of the dominant transition 4G5/2-6H9/2
peaking at 645.0 nm for Sm3 doped NZPGT glasses is
larger than those of Sm3 doped K2O LiF ZnF2
Al2O3 P2O5 (9.05 10 22 cm2) [48], Na2O K2O PbF2
Al2O3 P2O5
(9.18 10 22 cm2)
[49]
and
ZnO
SrO Nb2O5 TeO2 B2O3 glasses (9.67 10 22 cm2) [46],
predicting that the red fluorescence emission can be
efficiently extracted from the optical glasses for potential
laser applications.
Fig. 5 presents the measured fluorescence decay curves
of 0.04 wt%, 0.2 wt%, 0.4 wt% and 1.2 wt% Sm2O3 doped
NZPGT glasses monitoring at 598.5 nm under 405.0 nm
excitation and the experimental fluorescence lifetimes exp
of the 4G5/2 level of Sm3 were determined to be 1.33, 1.27,
1.18 and 0.90 ms, respectively. The four fluorescence decay
curves are approximately single-exponential and the
lower the Sm2O3 doping concentration, the better the
fluorescence decay curve single-exponential fitted.
The internal quantum efficiencies q (q exp =rad ) for
0.04 wt%, 0.2 wt%, 0.4 wt% and 1.2 wt% Sm2O3 doped
NZPGT glasses were solved to be 93.0%, 88.8%, 82.5% and
62.9%, respectively. The reduction in the q can be attributed to the non-radiative (NR) processes including multiphonon relaxation (MPR) and energy transfer (ET).
According to the MiyakawaDexter theory, the MPR rate
WMPR can be expressed by W MPR W 0 exp E=,
where W0, , E and are the decay rate when E0, the
positive host-dependent constant, the energy gap to the next
lower level and the phonon energy of the host, respectively.
67
The energy gap between the 4G5/2 level and the next lower
level 6F11/2 is approximately 7400 cm 1 and requires at least 9
intrinsic phonons to bridge the interval in the MPR process,
which can be negligible in Sm3 doped NZPGT glasses.
Therefore, the ET process is the dominant factor leading the
depopulation of the 4G5/2 level for Sm3 , and the ET rate WET
can be estimated by the formula W ET 1=exp 1=rad
W MPR 1=exp 1=rad : The WET for 0.04 wt%, 0.2 wt%,
0.4 wt% and 1.2 wt% Sm2O3 doped NZPGT glasses were solved
to be 52.6, 88.1, 148.2 and 411.8 s 1, respectively. With the
increase of doping concentration of Sm2O3, the exp decreases
and the WET increases owing to more Sm3 ions involved in
ET processes.
3.4. Excitation spectrum and excitated state analysis
As shown in Fig. 6, the excitation spectrum of 0.2 wt%
Sm2O3 doped NZPGT glasses monitoring at 598.5 nm
exhibits a broad excitation wavelength region of
340 500 nm, indicating that near-UV/violet/blue lasers
and LEDs together with Ar lasers can be used as efficient
pump sources for the optical glasses. The inset of Fig. 6
shows the partial energy level diagram of Sm3 . Taking
405.0 nm excitation for example, Sm3 ions lying at the
ground state 6H5/2 are firstly pumped to the excited state
4
F7/2, then depopulated to the metastable state 4G5/2
through multiphonon relaxation process due to the closely
spaced energy states between them, finally resulting in
multichannel visible and NIR emission transitions, i.e. 4G5/2
-6H5/2 (562.0 nm), 4G5/2-6H7/2 (598.5 nm), 4G5/2-6H9/2
(645.0 nm) and 4G5/2-6H11/2 (707.5 nm).
3.5. Quantitative characterization and analysis on external
quantum yield
In order to essentially reveal the absolute spectral
property of visible fluorescence for 0.4 wt% Sm2O3 doped
NZPGT glasses, spectral power distributions P shown in
Fig. 7(a) were recorded using the integrating sphere
method with commercial blue LED as pump source when
the glass sample with a dimensions of 0.898 0.882
0.308 cm3 was located on and aside the LED pump source,
denoted by Pon and Pside respectively.
Radiant flux of the luminescence can be calculated by
R
P d: The radiant flux of 0.4 wt% Sm2O3 doped
NZPGT glasses under the blue LED excitation with peak
excitation wavelength at 456 nm was derived to be
Table 4
Maximum emission cross-sections sem-max (10 22 cm2) of Sm3 in various glasses.
Glass system
G5/2-6H5/2
0.64
0.65
0.96
0.99
1.14
1.17
1.20
1.57
1.54
G5/2-6H7/2
G5/2-6H9/2
G5/2-6H11/2
10.00
6.95
4.90
5.92
9.35
8.98
12.60
9.21
8.59
9.67
3.29
4.63
4.49
9.05
9.18
8.30
6.73
10.00
4.13
2.62
1.86
2.08
3.04
3.16
4.70
4.14
2.98
Ref.
[46]
[47]
[9]
[38]
[48]
[49]
[42]
[35]
This work
68
F. Wang et al. / Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy & Radiative Transfer 147 (2014) 6370
Fig. 5. Measured fluorescence decay curves of 0.04 wt% (a), 0.2 wt% (b), 0.4 wt% (c) and 1.2 wt% (d) Sm2O3 doped NZPGT glasses monitoring at 598.5 nm
and under 405.0 nm excitation.
Nv
3
P ;
hc
F. Wang et al. / Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy & Radiative Transfer 147 (2014) 6370
69
4. Conclusions
Acknowledgments
where Eon and Eside were emitted photon numbers from the
sample, Lon and Lside were recorded photon numbers
emitted from the LED pump source when the sample was
located on and aside the LED pump source, respectively. |
Lon Lside| and |Eon Eside| are net absorption and emission
photon numbers, respectively, evaluated by integrating the
net absorption and emission photon distribution as shown
in Fig. 8. The net absorption and emission photon distribution of 0.4 wt% Sm2O3 doped NZPGT glasses was derived by
subtracting the Nside component from the Non component
and the QY was calculated to be 6.0%.
References
[1] Harbuzaru BV, Corma A, Rey F, Jord JL, Ananias D, Carlos LD, et al. A
miniaturized linear pH sensor based on a highly photoluminescent
self-assembled europium (III) metalorganic framework. Angew
Chem Int Ed 2009;48:64769.
[2] Reddy AA, Das S, Goel A, Sen R, Siegel R, Mafra L, et al. KCa4(BO3)3:
Ln3 (Ln Dy, Eu, Tb) phosphors for near UV excited white-lightemitting diodes. AIP Adv 2013;3:02212640.
[3] Stoneman RC, Esterowitz L. Efficient, broadly tunable, laser-pumped
Tm:YAG and Tm:YSGG cw lasers. Opt Lett 1990;15:4868.
70
F. Wang et al. / Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy & Radiative Transfer 147 (2014) 6370
[28] Wang JS, Vogel EM, Snitzer E. Tellurite glass: a new candidate for
fiber devices. Opt Mater 1994;3:187203.
[29] Kishi Y, Tanabe S. Properties of Tm3 -doped germanotellurite
glasses for S-band amplifier. J Am Ceram Soc 2006;89:23640.
[30] Monteiro G, Santos LF, Pereira JCG, Almeida RM. Optical and
spectroscopic properties of germanotellurite glasses. J Non-Cryst
Solids 2011;357:2695701.
[31] Wang G, Zhang J, Xu S, Dai S, Hu L, Jiang Z. Thermal analysis, spectra
and laser properties of a new Yb3 -doped multicomponential
tellurite-based glass. J Lumin 2004;109:17.
[32] Carnall WT, Fields PR, Rajnak K. Electronic energy levels in the
trivalent lanthanide aquo ions. I. Pr3 , Nd3 , Pm3 , Sm3 , Dy3 ,
Ho3 , Er3 , and Tm3 . J Chem Phys 1968;49:442442.
[33] Krupke WF. Optical absorption and fluorescence intensities in
several rare-earth-doped Y2O3 and LaF3 single crystals. Phys Rev
1966;145:32537.
[34] Gheorghe C, Georgescu S, Lupei V, Lupei A, Ikesue A. Absorption
intensities and emission cross section of Er3 in Sc2O3 transparent
ceramics. J Appl Phys 2008;103:08311620.
[35] Jayasimhadri M, Eun-Jin C, Ki-Wan J, Ho Sueb L, Sun IlK. Spectroscopic properties and JuddOfelt analysis of Sm3 doped leadgermanate-tellurite glasses. J Phys D Appl Phys 2008;41:1751017.
[36] Mohan Babu A, Jamalaiah BC, Sasikala T, Saleem SA, Rama Moorthy
L. Absorption and emission spectral studies of Sm3 -doped lead
tungstate tellurite glasses. J Alloys Compd 2011;509:47437.
[37] Mazurak Z, Body S, Lisiecki R, Gabry-Pisarska J, Czaja M. Optical
properties of Pr3 , Sm3 and Er3 doped P2O5 CaO SrO BaO
phosphate glass. Opt Mater 2010;32:54753.
[38] Suhasini T, Suresh Kumar J, Sasikala T, Jang K, Lee HS, Jayasimhadri
M, et al. Absorption and fluorescence properties of Sm3 ions in
fluoride containing phosphate glasses. Opt Mater 2009;31:116772.
[39] Raju CN, Sailaja S, Kumari SP, Dhoble SJ, Kumar VR, Ramanaiah MV,
et al.
Emission analysis of RE3 (RE Sm, Dy):B2O3 TeO2
Li2O AlF3 glasses. Luminescence 2013;28:1628.
[40] Suresh Kumar J, Pavani K, Sasikala T, Sreenivasa Rao A, Giri NK, Rai
SB, et al. Photoluminescence and energy transfer properties of
Sm3 doped CFB glasses. Solid State Sci 2011;13:154853.
[41] Sasikala T, Rama Moorthy L, Mohan Babu A. Optical and luminescent
properties of Sm3 doped tellurite glasses. Spectrochim Acta A
2013;104:44550.
[42] Madhukar Reddy C, Dillip GR, Mallikarjuna K, Zulifiqar Ali Ahamed
S, Sudhakar Reddy B, Deva Prasad Raju B. Absorption and fluorescence studies of Sm3 ions in lead containing sodium fluoroborate
glasses. J Lumin 2011;131:136875.
[43] Praveena R, Venkatramu V, Babu P, Jayasankar CK. Fluorescence
spectroscopy of Sm3 ions in P2O5 PbO Nb2O5 glasses. Physica B
2008;403:352734.
[44] Lakshminarayana G, Weis EM, Lira AC, Caldio U, Williams DJ,
Hehlen MP. Cross Relaxation in rare-earth-doped oxyfluoride
glasses. J Lumin 2013;139:13242.
[45] Ravi Babu YNC, Sree Ram Naik P, Vijaya Kumar K, Rajesh Kumar N,
Suresh Kumar A. Spectral investigations of Sm3 doped lead
bismuth magnesium borophosphate glasses. J Quant Spectrosc
Radiat Transf 2012;113:166975.
[46] Ravi O, Madhukar Reddy C, Manoj L, Deva Prasad Raju B. Structural
and optical studies of Sm3 ions doped niobium borotellurite
glasses. J Mol Struct 2012;1029:539.
[47] Sailaja S, Nageswara Raju C, Adinarayana Reddy C, Deva Prasad Raju
B, Jho Y-D, Sudhakar Reddy B. Optical properties of Sm3 -doped
cadmium bismuth borate glasses. J Mol Struct 2013;1038:2934.
[48] Lim K-S, Vijaya N, Kesavulu CR, Jayasankar CK. Structural and
luminescence properties of Sm3 ions in zinc fluorophosphate
glasses. Opt Mater 2013;35:155763.
[49] Kesavulu CR, Jayasankar CK. Spectroscopic properties of Sm3 ions
in lead fluorophosphate glasses. J Lumin 2012;132:28029.
[50] Bass M, DeCusatis C, Enoch J, Lakshminarayanan V, Li G, Macdonald C,
et al. Handbook of optics,third edition volume II: design, fabrication and testing, sources and detectors, radiometry and photometry.
New York: McGraw-Hill; 2010.
[51] Rohwer LS, Martin JE. Measuring the absolute quantum efficiency of
luminescent materials. J Lumin 2005;115:7790.